belarus shmatem prostrate can be otshukat on the braslav bus here is a ball into the lake for a non-random. name god's wok, in spite of the lake tore off the wild one with its ripples and kiya guess the wolf in the maya lake, the shape of the correct ones the circle does not change for stretching debts, there is far, that the wok sews people from the sky behind the right and shmat them such ball chandeliers in belarus we are waiting for today from moscow

means, justice does not cause any doubts. it's true about relevance 2020 showed that among us were those people who do not share are not our values, nor our aspirations, respectively, they are at the same time, being the conductors of someone else's ideology in our society. they didn't create much, let's say. a good environment among our people and at the same time enjoyed all the benefits that our state gives, that is, there were enemy elements inside

, let's call it that way, the time has come for society to realize that it is necessary today where we are moving. e, realized the value of what we have and what we have, and probably found the mechanism that allows to differentiate people who are ready to live in this society, develop it and find new vectors of development. and that valve is a mechanism for protecting our society from external and internal influences, this is this law. probably it should be said, especially to those of our viewers. whoever looks at us in russia outside of belarus did not delve into the points of this law there, that there is not an automatic deprivation, if the mechanism and notification are an opportunity to consider danism. uh, the first is such a person who must

live abroad for a long time, the second is those persons who, in principle, and in legal terms , are cut off from our state. it is important to emphasize these people who have committed any destructive actions. uh, to put it simply, crimes against national security are felonies, and, uh, acts of terrorism. this is mercenarism and this is the sovereign. institutional construction attempted on treason and in a circle on the integrity of our state, a call for sanctions, of course, and this mechanism will be quite serious, firstly, the necessary decision court. e in the court decision. of course , all the dots will already be dotted over and either this or that person will be recognized or not recognized. it, that is, in the commission of certain grave crimes against national security

, and the decision to deprive citizenship will be made by the head of state. yes indeed. uh, today a person who even received citizenship of the republic of belarus by birth. it can deprive him, but if you do not respect your state, do not respect your constitution, do not comply with the laws of the country , you allow such actions to be illegal. well it means you make your own choice. and, by the way, there is nothing new here because in many. countries, including democratic countries, as they call themselves, strange europe also have the possibility of deprivation of citizenship, for example, in the same austria, germany, spain, they are deprived of citizenship. if you work in another state in the public service or military service , such a person is already automatically deprived of citizenship and there is nothing to worry about. we just set the accents, but for us today it is important that we form a civil society in this difficult time. and it is important for us that this civil society

be healthy, that our citizens , the state and civil society. well, that is, citizens, every citizen were protected, so that our state really developed steadily and there was stability. to do this, i understand that i understand, having looked at the points of this law, that in general you need to try hard. that's hard, just like that, kicking the lord so that they start you. in general , the process of depriving you of citizenship is unconditional. this will not really be put on stream on the conveyor. you are right, very much to be told. here is the same tikhanovskaya. yes? tell us, let's say, what kind of mercy, even in general, was from our state, she was allowed to leave after what she had done here in august. twentieth year. well, sit and be quiet, tell me. well, if you don't thank me, then at least just keep quiet. yes, i understand that this is a talking head. i understand that it does not mean anything, but at the same time, if you opened your mouth, then you must understand the consequences of your statements

against the state according to klinovsky. what is she understands that the citizens do not have anything complicated. the first committed a crime the court decision entered into force. we offer you to come, executing court decisions. you are a citizen. you have not only rights, but also obligations, the obligation to comply with the decision of a lawful court, did not come here and refused to comply with the decision. we are depriving you of everything, why are we depriving you, why do we need a leaf, for example, which has been for several years already how many three years? soon in the gabile of his country. at first they called for robbing a socially unprotected group impose sanctions. now they are calling for shooting, that is, bombing, the city of minsk, a number of people. yes they rolled because they did not call on their own country to attack the drg, sabotage reconnaissance groups, or bomb our capital. well, what are we going to do with them? why do we need such people, for example , to include in the political process? start price. here you are, when, as a deputy in parliament, you considered something of a bill, and here are the changes that we are now

discussing with you. here is the internal what motivation, it is understandable that you pass through yourself to analyze and facts and ask yourself a question. why these changes should be made right now, you know, i would like to draw the attention, including our viewers, to the accuracy of the wording, there is not deprivation of citizenship, but loss of citizenship. this is a completely different and legal and indeed meaning, that is, a person with his active anti-state actions and actions. anything directed against the belarusian people leads to the fact that such decisions will be made against them. yes it the entry into force of a court verdict is also important. that is, this is a criminal investigation. this is a trial entry. eh, in force. uh, the decision of the court of the verdict of the court in relation to this citizen being abroad, or either the enormous harm that he causes. uh,

the republic of belarus as well. it also contains the norms of the law that if a person is in military service, occupies a state position, some state position in a foreign state, then this is also the basis for the loss of citizenship. but it is natural that this addition to this law is also discussed in the working groups and in the oval hall. we said that there will be more procedures. exactly how this loss uh, procedurally will be carried out. we have a commission on citizenship issues under the president of the republic of belarus, where documents are prepared and a commission is prepared with the participation of representatives, e and heads of the presidential administration of the ministry of departments of the deputy corps, the whole composition is indicated by the president, before submitting it to the decision of the head of state all these reasons will be filtered again

and checked again. it's like granting citizenship such loss of citizenship, because, in my opinion, more than detailed. we talked about this further, who are interested can read the laws. although i believe that this law is narrowly special, it is only for those who really tried very hard to harm the state. so he needs to study this law for all other citizens to live in peace, you are not even interested. with this thread, she's definitely wrong. security theme, let's talk globally about it. moreover, in this sense, a lot of things threaten us. this is, of course, the nato summit that started in vilnius, uh, some unhealthy hype this time around, they began to talk about it for a long time somewhere absolutely objectively. it deserves to be screwed up somewhere. well , for example, why doesn't he tell us about this? if perishing as something, well, too close to us. it is no coincidence that vadim chose several aspects closer to the borders of the union state. first, it is natural to show that

we are nearby asking for a permanent deployment, not a rotational official deployment, a reinforced grouping of troops, and at our borders it specifically shows that we are here, we are nearby, we are nearby and they, well, at the same time , it’s scary, judging by the way they guarded vilnius, how many cars are ready to lock everyone up you see, they are there on the outskirts, you can’t see everything is carried out not in the very center. so, in essence, the first issue here is the membership of ukraine is speculation. i just want to understand that everything is happening separately, let's talk, but so that what is happening regarding this issue, no one, let’s say, is planning to do it yet, because no one is interested in, let’s say, ukraine, e . we would not like to bring. this special us military provocation in europe is at least 24 years old before the political processes in the russian federation.

why is it not supplying weapons? that's what nato is discussing in full and quickly they need to fill up it’s not even profitable for them to keep this porridge on fire so that it doesn’t boil away for them, so that it’s not russia or ukraine that won the decisive victory because it’s, well, on some battlefields, because it’s to force negotiations at the table. and they need to destabilize the region. it is natural to understand that this is a threat and both. our answer uh-huh is asymmetric, but understand that we will be destroyed from the inside in uh. well, let's talk about nato in more detail, we'll discuss it very close to us. and we , one way or another, for the whole world you are involved in what they were discussing there yesterday and today they continue long before themselves, kiev began to repeat the mantra that they take us to nato . but he arrived, although it was already before the beginning. it is clear that they do not take even before the meeting of the nato members. german publications reported that the united states and germany

blocked ukraine's entry into nato, that is, first they inspired zelensky, then they land him on the other side. didn’t he understand that no one takes or where he got this idea that this topic is in general it may be relevant why it arose nikolaevich zelensky is a wonderful manipulator and a very good actor, i have already spoken on this topic more than once, but the ability to use any information occasion to your advantage. it is very good for him, it turns out to be himself . if he outplayed, he would be sure that his bet would play out. what a player who clearly understood that at the moment he is a real tool in the hands of the euro-atlantic union for weakening russia to destabilize this region and

he had many advantages, because, well, everything that he asked for, what he demanded, everything was given to him. pay attention to weapons of various types, starting there from javelins, ending with aircraft. we have discussed before. in this same studio, a question was asked somewhere a year ago. will the planes be given them and in the near future there will be more of them . this is not the point. the fact is that the reorganization of the world is underway, a real process is underway with the restoration of a multipolar world, and ukraine has been chosen as an instrument by the west in order not to allow this today the reality is this. and zelensky believed in his exclusivity, so to speak, that he can, and he knows how to manipulate, certain hmm information flows, and to some extent zelensky, practically convinced himself and convinced a large piece of people or society,

including foreign society, that without him, nowhere and this allowed him, among other things, to convince himself that he will achieve this decision within the framework of nato from interesting and at the same time disturbing messages on the eve of the macron said that the bet was the decision to transfer missiles to ukraine long-range for, as he again explained, support for the offensive of the armed forces in the kremlin reacted to peskov's quote. naturally. this will force us to take countermeasures. this topic has already been discussed several times. at first , the uk spoke about it and gave the same missiles , yes, yes, this is in terms of their range in terms of their characteristics. they are comparable. after that, the same step was taken, france, she did not because she wants this, the macron needs to show his importance in europe, he must show that he is no worse, than the uk here. mm struggle for power in european. uh, let's say in the theater that it is

stronger than germany, including france is fighting germany for leadership and so on, but this is nothing more. how, again, is the information stuffing on this wave to show how great we are, that we are ready to go to the end, and so on. no more than that, they will give rockets, we will already talk about this and dali and they will give and give everything that is possible , including everything that shoots everything that explodes will be delivered to ukraine not immediately about this. we have already said we must the sequence of aggression to carry out to bring, the peak will be when there is some kind of hacking the situation in russia is as soon as it will stagger. if this is what it is , it is clear that if russia now inflicted a crushing defeat, what alexander grigoryevich e spoke about during the counterattack, you put these main divisions there, which are still in reserve. of course, this, uh, would force kiev to negotiate and not the fact that after reaching an agreement. this would not resume the situation after some time, but at the current moment they are waiting for hour x when the impact is maximum. and now they are probing a gap in

the defense. and here are these uh cluster munitions that will be transferred by the united states. america, we'll probably talk about it later. it's like why in the first place to break through the defense. here's a poddub. in this case, he, if you read his telegram channel, referring to which is there on the front line, claims that the very announced bomb clusters are already being struck. that is, they are already there, according to the people who are there with ivanovic how do you know look at the threats that have increased after that self- confidence? no wonder they gave it and were afraid, how do you evaluate or overheated? i think that what is the complexity of the situation for nato and why such expectations were from the summit on the part of ukraine, because yes, zelensky is an actor, but the most important thing in his position is not acting, but purely business, so he is in addition to the fact that he is an actor the businessman also says, well, he does business in politics. and what is the policy of ukraine, it is a weapon and a spearhead

against russia, namely the west, what are hats with positions of nato, now she needs to make such decisions so as not to get herself into trouble and i consciously say this word not to get into the third world war and continue the fire. it is the confrontation with russia in the form of a special military operation and hostilities in ukraine, therefore ukraine needs to be supported in order for this escalation to continue and continue in the right direction. yes, there were hopes that there would be a counter , there would be some successes here, there are no successes, except for the seven villages there, which they liberated according to them words about which there are actually no, which are vulnerable. eh, because they captured the lowlands. they are just settlements of the square, and now the war is not going on because of the square, therefore, the maximum program in the west which is to destroy russia and is it right? the point of view was said here that it is necessary to create conditions for the internal collapse

of russia and when the events took place, uh, on the twenty-third. e june, yes, then a certain hope that it had begun, but they simply did not have time to very quickly, it was all localized, therefore, in essence. which now, what happened and is happening now in reality a little over a year ago, when we introduced a visa-free regime in relations. uh , the baltic states, uh, after some time poland. i here quoted the words of a simple citizen of lithuania who, by nationality, from belarus , was born there, and he said, what is the difference between uh. in the west of lithuania from belarus, he says that in belarus you have here trying to make a person out of any fool. in our country, on the contrary, they make a fool out of a person. so, what is the meaning of vilnius itself, what of they made a fool of ukraine, not only from ukraine, i’ll tell you as an anecdote what is happening at the summit, which means that local residents in lithuania

noticed that old trolleybuses 160 still of czechoslovak production disappeared from the streets of vilnius in the eighties appeared on the street and so the notes in this way . i wanted to show that the country is still ok, still the norm. a new technique has appeared, but the lithuanians themselves are outraged by such show-off a couple of examples of what and how they think about the score, please, and why should we hide that we are a poor country, and the grass will be painted ashamed, even while reading why hide what is ordinary why do you need to look better? more beautiful than you are, in fact. you think that no one knows anything, that the world's millionaires do not know how lithuanians live. what a terrible backwardness everywhere is a disgrace. so close pensioners with the poor, otherwise it will spoil the image of boasting. well, you know how immediately, when you look at this, the picture on the seat of his complexes. the main thing is to

like this byte, you probably know such logic complexes. maybe he is a modest person, but i would like to tell him there you know that he probably turned out well for his colleague for zelensky, showed everything here and asked for money, but they treat him like this in this way. yes, behind such a facade hides, indeed, the true problem of the country. a. we do know that if you're leaving a lot of people not enough jobs the economy isn't doing well, maybe you should have thought about your citizens showing problems concentrating with you. of course, of course, they now have quite another problem is they e, through their binoculars they see the enemy, a union state for them, we are enemies. although historically. we have always lived nearby and could be great neighbors, yes, russia and so on. well, we'll live and see. but speaking more about ourselves, if you will allow me hmm well, after all, somewhere it warmed

the soul that it was written in the communiqué that, and today the alliance does not seek confrontation with russia it also seems to me such a signal that the third world war . we do not want we are not idiots. uh, vadim was talking about not they want negotiations, yes, that is, they cannot allow negotiations between russia and ukraine, you know who knows him today? look, no matter how there was a counteroffensive. it well, there are no obvious results that the alliance was waiting for from ukraine, they are not there, what will happen? tomorrow we don't know, uh, i'm certainly not a military expert but analyzing the opinion of military experts. i think that this is not a long-range weapon, which has already been additionally provided to france , not cluster weapons. ah, ammo. they won't decide anything on the battlefield. yes, there will be more there will be more victims today. uh,

maybe, uh, the united states of america wants to save face somewhere. you understand, if suddenly russia wins, but suddenly who loses america and no, there are guarantees that ukraine will win. and today there are two options, either we play for a long time, and then we'll see, or before the twenty-fourth year. still , you need to think and come up with some option on how to get out of this situation in america. still, it’s more beautiful, it seems to be not a loser and at the same time, in order to somehow change this situation a little, but let's live and see. it is us, too , the president today declares that let's sit down at the negotiating table. and even in principle, it assumes that such negotiations between russia and ukraine will be possible. autumn, i would really like it to be the first. naturally. i am a supporter of the position of alexander lukashenko from the first day we are supporters of negotiations. but i want to tell you so, any military

specialist to tell you, uh, and any such project that has been preparing for more than one, not one year. there are several scenarios, there are scenarios, cover-ups and so on. and both russian and american ideologists are ready to justify everything with them. if it is necessary to explain any input of events , they have learned to manipulate the mass consciousness from all sides, so let's get down to business. now what will happen? as i think, naturally, we will facilitate the negotiations as much as possible on the question of what contractual position the parties will have if your contractual position is unbalanced and one of the parties is dissatisfied. they will leave you minutes of windy action. well right, than before we'll sit down and stop the c-collision. it will be better anyway, but in my opinion, the task of the united states of america is not for nato to unite this entire group of more than thirty states, as one whole these are different groups. there are major interests. this is the united states , their allies, canada, which means, uh. well, they are , respectively, great britain. here they are, on

this now, they are heating their pens. there is an impact force. ukraine is under reserve. this is primarily in poland in the first place. poland has those who pay the reckoning. this is europe it's not the us that pays for this concert , it's europe and the us is interested in giving the appearance that they are interested in stabilizing this situation. once again i say to drag out the conflict, at least until the political campaign of 24 years in russia, to pump the situation from the inside, not a single country in the world can find it indefinitely in a state of constant mobilization of society. now they are none. they for uh first their task. look at 58% of the world's reserves in dollar settlements indirect direct 88% of settlements in the world in dollars. and they didn't save it. thanks to this military operation , the energy of the european unions was taken under control. what are not idiots, or what? why stop it? therefore, they will only stop if they see

an immediate threat. i have been saying all this for a year and a half, until they feel threatened. here they will tilt europe and push uh ukraine into the ashes of war. unfortunately, we must do everything to ensure that this is what my colleague is talking about that will follow the negotiating table. well than the more time goes by we see, it's really impossible to disagree with what we see over all the hmm action of the west and the supply of cluster munitions before that. with the combined uranium and so on and so forth, they need ukraine as a military base under the cover of the state to double the aid. why should you try harder? now let's listen to the president. the further, the further this situation goes, the less promising the discussion about peace becomes for ukraine, the president spoke about it. foreign journalists asked him questions about this was asked. as you see the situation, here is a small fragment of what the president answered. today it is possible to talk with ukraine and reach some kind of peace agreements. i mean, not so much

belarus e as russia she will talk after the so-called counter offensive. the situation will change and if they want to talk to you, the zelensky reinforced concretely declared, we will support you , we will arm you, we will give you as much money as you need, we will never give up, and then the woman’s wings appeared, he flew. and what happening? now he finally understood that he would not win this war. each of the heroes of the new people project chose their own path and achieved their first big success. he is very tenacious, grasping, thanks to these character traits, he achieves what he achieves, talented brave people are always ready to learn something new, they really

work, because here are tears of pain, but at the same time she understood that she would get up in the morning, everything would be fine. she will come out beautifully on stage will receive positive energy to go to the competition, uh, he organized exhibition and performed there and put the dj in the center of the exhibition hall. uh, a fishing tent. he closed himself in it and played music from there. it was. well, such a provocation, i still want to become you. the question is, how does he see it, this is the most beautiful thing. you should probably love it, but for the new generation of belarusians, watch on belarus 24 tv channel. travel is not only an acquaintance with history and sights, it is an amazing place. who was not here yet, and the future

marshal malinovsky with his regiment and the well-known writer konstantin paustovsky and even the world-famous women's travel battalion is an opportunity to try something new to try on an image from the distant past. god, how cute is that. it's a real dream. it seems to me that i should invest in this time and, of course , join the unique folk art. pay attention here, we also have salamy lards, run, we also make mock-ups. uh, here we have a model of the church . see the route. on tv channel belarus 24 there is still a nato summit going on. now being discussed

goes. we will soon know what happened there today, well, the situation. in another, i personally, as a person who deals, in general, with geopolitical geostrategic issues, was very much hurt by the topic of the escalation of tension. it can be traced in all decisions, especially in the joint decision of nato. pay attention to them today. they are no longer talking about europe, not the north atlantic space. they talk about world space and as one of their promising so to say, uh opponents they call china a. china is completely on the other side. let's say our big one. brazilian continent about what? it goes to show that no one is going to, uh, stop using the force factor in political battles. this is the first honey

second moment. e clearly in the statement of the joint statement of nato there is a point that says that the option of getting out of the political situation, proposed by ukraine, is supported, that it says this will return everything to normal again and next to the russian federation there will be an e nato member of the appropriate infrastructure, appropriate preparation, which will continue to pursue that policy, the expansion and destruction of everything russian, which has been throughout all these years. the third point as for, again , no one is talking about the prospects for the near future. about how we are now discussing the issue of the negotiation process, the peace process. they don't talk about it. they condemn belarus and russia for hosting nuclear weapons. they talk about

going back to everything that's been fucked up for a long time. sorry to everyone they can talk about being concerned about what's going on here, but no one talks about we stop supplying weapons. this is the main point that should be discussed today. even if they already have enough. well, its reserves are small, in fact , compared to what it was, they were sure that this would be enough to bring russia to its knees in order to destabilize the situation in russia and to ensure that russia's internal coup in another once destroyed their state. and this was the main calculation and is not removed. he continues the question of the game in a long year for them - it's called fu. this is a very short conversation about the five-year period, maybe for decades they are ready for this, because as soon as the ukrainian events end.

god forbid, in their opinion, in the interests of russia , russia will solve its strategic tasks. everything will fall down the whole world based on the rules. they know about it, they connect topics, but against all this background, we touched on the college in fragments of the press conference. not even funny it looks ridiculous when foreign journalists during an interview again talked about the last dictator. on the road. reuters journalists. that's what i want to ask. that's what you're kidding, or something, one goes to john's concert when paris is on fire, the second endlessly freaks out publicly experiencing dementia. here it is again. let's see the canoe on the wedged . i wonder what else i kick the stands. not working yet, how about this? oh well, most importantly, both do not care that someone may not like it. macron, biden, zelensky at some point lukashenka notices. we have to change today

before me no. i'm not a dictator and if the dictator is not the last, well, while we all hide it from batin's old macron trolleybuses. he himself hides from the wrath of the people, he is lukashenko in the shops, mogilev is left-handed and talks about earthly things about the development of production markets. i mean, that's exactly what he meant. here is vladimir alexandrovich alexander lukashenko when he said that life without war is the result of painstaking daily work, firstly, lukashenko does not reign. he serves the people and the country. this prove the results of that 29 year sentence, which he received the country 29 years ago, when law enforcement agencies wiped their feet. in the center of the capital, the palace of the republic stood under a collapsed fence next to it, the kupalovsky theater collapsed, the economy is on the shoulder blades, pensioners are queuing for food, and today

we are the first in the world according to a number of un indices. cis between the upper strata of society, so to speak well-to-do and less strata explain it all as a matter of national security and stability. so that's the kind of country we are building power is based on the following principles. it is money and resources is power. and this is uh, consent in society, social stability, for which lukashenka says that we want peace, let's work qualitatively if we do not have a strong economy. we will not have the funds to buy the necessary or produce the necessary resources. we will not have the means to provide and maintain the power bloc and we will not be cut off in order to maintain socio-political stability, so we uprising uh-huh keep the peace in lukashenka , the power they will do everything that is possible two comparisons even before our eyes we discussed before in the sitting. and now we are discussing

what is happening here. we see that there he gathers this nato team and hides the old trolleybus instead of dealing with the problem we are here. after all, we, too , could write off so many internal issues that we really need more spend on the army for security. prior to that, the president would have sat there from morning to evening somewhere in the headquarters and dealt with the situation. the trust belongs to national groups. if everything is we can not even discuss it with them already. all. it's clear. what was it for, so that citizens understand, we are introducing tactical separate weapons here for this , among other things, in order to spend less money on confidential weapons, that is, we can inflict an asymmetric response and this allows us to stretch out in time. uh, rearmament of our armed forces strengthening our grouping, but they know that they are not allowed here today. we have such weapons that can cause them serious damage, and speaking of our security. we are talking about ours, we have kept the peace on belarusian soil.

not one belarusian soldier has set foot on a foreign land during the time of independence. uh, it was for the conduct of the war for the peacekeeping functions that there were injections, and we , as, uh, a member of the csto, were in kazakhstan. they went out and provided assistance, but we see what what what is the essence of these decisions that they must have taken made a decision regarding ukraine what all are against us all decisions against us they made a decision there to increase by half, uh, military aid for the supply of weapons. it plays against us. they shortened the path to nato for ukraine . and most importantly, they decided that they would accept ukraine into nato when the hostilities were over, when the fighting was going on. and we are not interested in this, and russia is also not interested in fighting . and when we agree, well, russia will agree, and there will be a truce with ukraine

it will become a nato country, this also plays against us, that is, not a single decision has been made in relation to us and the union state of belarus and russia in nato. that is, they are working for escalation, therefore, what is important for us to ensure our national security in all areas, including in the economic one, and why the president now and mogilev, our elevator visits both fields and farms, because we are not an export-oriented state there will be an economic one, which correctly said , we will not have everything else, so we will not only we must maintain our economy, but we must maintain and develop opportunities for growth, not only economically and politically and culturally and as a nation. we must develop, we have achieved a lot. during the time of our independence, we have built a sovereign country. and the main task in the message is clearly formulated to preserve the sovereignty and independence of the belarusian state. and what

do we need to do to do this. we understand everything. we need to make sure that we have stability in society, so that we e develop further, so that we, as a nation, improve. we have everything for this, we have a nuclear power plant, we have space, we flew. we have something to be proud of, but we must continue to develop, they hide no one's buses, look, the formula sounded in mogilev from the president was the lack of discipline. what alexander ivanovich is talking about is the lack of discipline - this is a failure, a failure. this war all starts with the economy, therefore nato nato, but it is necessary like this, as this is the formula that the president proposed or voiced in principle, they has been voiced for ten years. pay attention. you watch the president's speech. that's over the past five years though. before that, 10 years is possible, because this is the main thing, if there is stability, if there is understanding, if there is responsibility at any level from

the lowest to the highest , there are states, if there is a state, there are appropriate forces to ensure national security, there are appropriate resources for development and formation and, probably, stable stable development of the state. and here would i wanted to draw attention to this phrase. after all, the president says not only national security, but also the development of the country depends on everyone. this is true. we have a people's state. there is a powerful spike between the authorities and the people, so we are still alive and developing, and i would probably not add such a thesis to this, but i would add a postulate if we were not interfered with. we would no longer know at what level of development belarus would be if we were not forced to turn to incomprehensible neighbors to nato which rattles constantly outside, and all this

resource was directed to the development of the state. today we have here no worse than it was in the emirates. and maybe even better. yes, you know, i will support nikolai ognevich, the president really speaks about this, clearly and understandably. and you can even cite a couple of his such, uh, capacious statements, and stop there. here is his favorite. get undressed and work, work, do everything, and give me the economy everything else. i will do for you. he really stressed that the economy is very important if it develops, we will have everything and we will have a pension, we will have wages, but our country will develop. you know, despite all the difficulties that we face today, despite the unprecedented ones. uh, sanctions pressure. i, unfortunately, forgot. and whose statistics were those, but the statistics were foreign and belarus got into the top 10 countries, yes, the top 10 countries for hmm yes, moving from life, you

understand, among canada there is the eighth world, in my opinion, british. i just wanted to emphasize what kind of milestone statistics, this means that we are doing everything right, but of course we must go ahead and work and understand that we must and it is very important to do this. and of course, do not relax today is the time. thank you very much for, uh, participation in our program in general, the program itself is still going on in a couple of minutes, another interlocutor. today we have russian political scientist sergei mikheev so see you. thank you very much, the russian political scientist sergey mikheev sergey alexandrovich is in touch with us hello, who, apparently , recently tried to torture the belarusian president foreign journalists deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus. well, in

the interests of our country, alexander lukashenko, in general, said everything, but what tasks does russia solve in this way? well, as far as i see it. yes, i cannot answer, so to speak, for the whole of russia, the russian authorities. but as far as i can see, this is, in general, a forced measure. yes, that is uh here to think. uh, what does it mean, moscow all his life dreamed of placing nuclear weapons there for belarus and moving it to the territory, so to speak, e to another states. well, somehow naive, it is clear that this measure is forced to be connected. she, uh, with the pressure that nato puts on both russia and belarus on the union state. oh, and this measure, which should apparently give a signal that, in principle, russia is ready for the most stringent measures. she pushes her most. uh , it means that the most serious and powerful forces, as it were, are pushing closer to the borders of nato. that is , this is a measure of containment by nato, that's all. yes, this is the first second uh, i think we

are showing nato that in case of aggression against belarus russia will protect this territory, including. because nuclear weapons are deployed here, that is, uh, if, uh, well, the enemy, we will directly call it decides, for example, let's say from belarus to do about the same thing as with ukraine and move even closer to the borders of russia there for a couple there for a couple of thousand kilometers, yes or for a couple of hundred kilometers, yes , then russia, uh, including poets, the reason will react as harshly as possible, that is, the first is the containment of nato, the second is an unequivocal hmm signal that against belarus any action. yes, russia will be regarded as practically aggression against russia, and it will, uh, react harshly to this. and so, in general, and in general, of course, everything, this is not from a good life. yes, and naturally. everyone would like to live peacefully, so to speak. it’s easier to trade with each other and all that, but in general, in

fact, of course, this is all from the realm of illusions. so that's how sweet, as if smooth and never was not, and apparently never will be. the fact of moving tactical nuclear weapons is in itself such a symbol of trust and mutual support. and that means a very definite signal, which they will also receive there. trust. yes, of course, this is a very serious trust here , to be honest, it is even impossible to come up with more serious measures of trust, because in fact we are showing that president lukashenka and his team and the belarusian people. we trust the keys, including those of our own destiny. that's what is important, yes, that is, a little. neither less nor more nor less. i think that here, uh, there can be no two opinions on this factor of finding this weapon. on our territory to give such a long-term effect, and the impact on the enemy. well, it’s hard to say here, because there is, of course, such a situation in which

this is the war that russia is waging, this conflict that russia is waging with ukraine, and , in fact, with nato, which is using ukraine as consumables. she goes in such a rather specific style that raises questions. well, including mine, for example, yes, you know, you know such an infantry war using conventional weapons and all. this made it possible for our adversaries to believe that nuclear weapons could never be used. i think that this is the question. she's not profitable. neither to us, nor belarus to anyone. yes, i think that our adversary should understand that nuclear weapons would not be very desirable if they were ever used, but that they can be used and let's hope that this step in relation to belarus yes, will force them to this topic to think about. although, again, as for me, the operation in ukraine, of course, should move more so paradoxical for the enemy in ways less predictable. less calculated plus here is the factor of poland more, of course, i decided that she caught here, which means some chance for her, uh, for

her luck, a chance to build some huge huge zone of polish influence. i do not say i will not talk about the commonwealth because, as for me. eh, to be honest, the polish elite cannot even govern ukraine, even if they suddenly get it, so to speak, such opportunities are one of the problems after the elite is historical. it is her such inner malice. if you like, yes , extreme and polish nationalism, in fact, like any other extreme nationalism. he always narrows, uh, the scale of decision-making, that is, on the one hand. it can, therefore, at a time somewhere in a limited area give a limited, so to speak, time, but a certain effect, but in general. uh, the radical nazi elites have never been capable of building such large , large and viable hmm political projects. this is one of the reasons why polish projects fail. where from centuries after centuries, it seems that they succeeded in something, then once and everything starts to fall down. yes? i think it's from

some kind of internal inferiority. to be honest, yes, but now it seems to the poles that they can manage ukraine, they can become the main ones there. in this case, they can increase their role, er, in their own in europe and here, of course, in belarus is a potential target for aggression. let's be honest, yes, it's not for nothing that they have been telling the truth for so many years. so this is the molotov-ribbentrop fact and you think everyone is offended recently, they support the belarusian position and everything connected with it, and now they are also asking the americans to place nuclear weapons on the territory of poland. so i think that, of course, these are also signals to the poles, whether they can again, here's to your question about whether they can realize it. uh, well, i think that we should, in theory, but maybe we lack a little bit of toughness, so to speak , sharpness and unpredictability in our actions. but this is my personal opinion. yes i believe that we act too predictable too linear sometimes our moves, as it were before and our, so to speak, motives. they are too calculated. we are the enemy in general, all these games of gentlemen. here, as for me, yes, we must finish.

you touched on the topic that the polish authorities are trying to convince senior fans to host nuclear weapons on the basis that moscow is handing over minsk and now we also need it, but that’s another question. here, will they give them this weapon? here is your version going to this is the west. well , let's rearrange a little here. these positions. in fact, the poles asked the americans for nuclear weapons, and before russia accepted. this is the decision such conversations were made by the poles asking for a serious increase in the military presence of the americans on the territory of poland yes, as it were, about building. there is a whole system of military bases and all that, and to a certain extent, the answer to these very things was the decision on russian slow weapons in belarus yes, that’s why the question here is what did it mean, the first chicken or the egg, it is important to me sight. yes, but still these measures i’m saying it again, this patient has quite big risks for russia . yes, and therefore she went for these things, as it were, yes, because there really

are serious dangers. there are quite serious dangers. will the americans? this is a weapon for the poles. i think no. by the way, this is also interesting. i think that moscow trusts minsk much more than washington trusts warsaw that's it, and that's all, yes, including, because i repeat once again, my polish elite is stricken with some kind of illness , you know, so to speak, such an internal malice. and by the way, ukrainian nationalism in a strange way. e seems to be like being, er, it means against. there, or, say, an antagonist to polish nationalism, he adopted a lot. eh, hell. uh, and even in the worst form of polish nationalism. this is an incredible limitation. so to speak. sometimes absolutely stupid malice. here is the readiness to take the most absurd steps there. even though it may be, if you count ahead, it becomes, but the problem is there. well, i, for example, let's say directly, as it were, yes, but they refer to the eve of world war ii

war, so to speak, the great patriotic war when well, poland played a serious role. e is what happened is what happened in the end. it was the poles who concluded the first agreement similar to the fact of the ground. uh, with hitler, as it were, yes, and not at all the soviet union of warsaw and berlin did this, therefore. eh, going back to your question, so to speak. i very much doubt that the americans went for it. these are too big risks. too big risks, especially against the background. meanwhile, in general , escalation is observed in other areas. we see that e from a fresh macron said that paris had decided to give ukraine a-a long-range missiles. for, as he said , support for the offensive of the armed forces in the kremlin on the eve of peskov reacted naturally. this will force us, uh, to take countermeasures. and here the question really arises. how to answer , they have already begun to joke in the telegram that, maybe it's time for the french rebels in paris to get support in the form of manpads and grenade launchers, but

it’s actually not funny in this situation. here, how do you see it? well, these are rockets to try. strikes deep into russian territory in my opinion, macron, uh, like many other european, so to speak, current politicians allow, uh, great stupidity, because france will not get anything from this, absolutely nothing to the question, what does europe get from the fact that it plays these games, absolutely nothing, yes, americans, uh, achieve certain goals. and here you can argue, yes, but the europeans only lose, because they are getting closer and closer to expose the situation. it's a big war in europe i hope it doesn't happen because it's one thing to send it there. so to speak, weapons and ammunition to ukraine is another thing to participate directly, but er, that's how they really make the situation. more and more dangerous. it really is. although, i believe that we and i are leading the russian side. of course, we spoiled them a little in this sense, because if only more decisive ones had acted

unambiguously from the very beginning of the special operation. maybe her course would have been different. here from the very beginning. because it was necessary to be more resolute in regard to political leadership. uh, means uh ukraine yes, and now the fact that we behave, you know, and again somehow we all play such gentlemanly games, like, well, we are there, somewhere there, which means that we are fighting in the east of ukraine, and everyone else can feel safe. yes, zelensky goes wherever he wants, so to speak, the macron, that he wants to allocate europeans to the americans. uh, so, uh don't feel any problems from everything that happened it gives them a feeling of permissiveness. well, let's put more such missiles, but russia is nothing won't do it for us specifically. let's put such put russia also did nothing in this sense. uh, the only ones, by the way, in my opinion, a really serious step is precisely this transfer of the part of our nuclear weapons of belarus to the nato summit in vilnius and kiev, as we saw, was very prepared, and it was like that, you know, and the multi-genre performance is a bit of a thriller ,

when the topic of nuclear plant strikes was whipped up a bit of tragicomedy, when the villagers promised. to come if the partners, well, they don’t show themselves like a man, they won’t accept him into nato but we see that, in principle, they are not expected there. here is the american edition first, the foreign one even earlier. fejer conveys the general mood that prevails in the west, and it wrote that the united states should close the nato door to ukraine because the risks are higher than the benefits. well, then the bild just mercilessly hits you in the forehead when it publishes that the united states germany blocked ukraine's entry into nato . nato no feeling that speech there is some kind of decisive stakes. first yes, regarding the admission of ukraine to nato in my opinion. uh, now they are linking this issue with the success or failure of the ukrainian

counteroffensive, in my opinion. nato would not have taken ukraine in any case not in one case not in another case neither in case of success, nor in case of failure. it's a game. now they will design a pr scheme. there will be two things . the first is a really real increase in ever new weapon packages, and the second is how to build such a pr scheme, so to speak. for example, there is the council of ukraine council of ukraine of nato, what will mean, so to speak, in reality, what powers it will have is not at all clear. yes? there will probably be some. well, in short, zelensky should apologize to bring to kiev, uh, it almost means that nato almost accepted our victory, so kuleba says this. and how can you prove it, so to speak, because we have almost free or nato, and then he says to list in all these pr, so to speak, the constructions that he now has advice from ukraine to nato, that is , some kind of simplified procedure there. although for now is also understandable. and what it will stand for is a simplified procedure. and when will it become possible? yes, i think such a thing, summing up, looking around. here

are all the topics that we discussed with you belarus russia here is what we need to focus attention on now first of all? sovereignty sovereignty in everything yes , first of all, the sovereignty of thought. yes, you need to unlearn, in the end, constantly compare your actions, your way of life, your way of thinking with someone who is there, as it were, somewhere beyond the cordon, because in your opinion it is not the sovereignty of thought e russian political elite in the first place. yes, to a large extent, it led to the situation in which we find ourselves in the second sovereignty of the economy. we need to learn to either reproduce what we once had or learn to do from scratch, uh, it’s strategically important, so to speak, for things, and machines, machines, equipment, airplanes, so to speak, cars, and so on. uh become as sovereign as possible in this to develop their own production. we need to be sovereign in politics. we need to be sovereign in terms of the view of defense on self-sufficient defense

is something that will undoubtedly be very relevant throughout the 21st century. we need to be ourselves feel like a civilization of self-sufficiency. accurate while being open where needed, but not allowing you to ride on your neck. that's what is important to do is to draw very serious conclusions from the thirty soviet years and seriously change. yes, change in the direction of civilizational identity, and therefore strength. thank you very much for participating in our program russian political scientist sergei mikheev was with you. as an ellipsis, two events of the week, as if from different universes although geographically within easy reach, the kiev region, armed with sledgehammers and gas canisters , the demons continued to squeeze out orthodox possessions, this time the transfiguration cathedral, a white church. at the same time, at the competition in

holland, the title of miss netherlands for the first time goes to a man. yes, you heard right guys. now, too, the bottom is a 22-year-old transgender. valery kale. now imagine the netherlands in the miss universe pageant when i look at these two events. even you, many of sweden's burning pencils, can't do this from the thought that we were all fooled by humanity, infected with tolerance, which in fact turned out to be a trojan horse. now we see how it works. give us your shrines, and in return for the beauty queen and converted men to the last, ukrainians, because they need this state, they need souls and do not agree that everything is happy today. childish curiosity

sincere interest i heard that you lived in the temple. why did you decide to withdraw from the outside world at school you dyed your hair in green-red color. why be very knowledgeable? wow, you have completely turned down the honesty and genuine emotions of the characters you promise to speak.

do you believe in love for the rest of your life? or you are of the opinion that she lives for 3 years, watch the project 100 questions for an adult on belarus 24 tv channel. it is your thirty- second thirty-second international art festival. slavic marketplace. in vitebsk it is a creative palette of all kinds of art and seven bright unforgettable days, two international vocal competitions, performers pop songs and children's music competition grandiose gala concerts and solemn ceremonies in the summer amphitheater special projects within the days of the union state solo programs, popular performers in the vitebsk concert hall catch a bright wave of all kinds of art along with the slavic whiskey bazaar.

political arithmetic, how the lesson of zelensky was taught by the nato summit and to whom minus by minus eastern europe gives pluses in business you lose, the whole house of wealth about forest fires, turkey and the canary islands and the vitebsk festival continues to collect everything flowers of july about the main thing to this hour in the news. noon i'll tell the geologists, slav bondarevich.