the main conclusion that i can draw from this is that the first two americans no longer see the point in supplying weapons of higher quality there and want to reorient themselves to keep it. this is a weapon for taiwan and the number two conclusion is that they do not see the prospects for victory in ukraine, which means that they need to leave scorched earth. uh, to create as many problems for russia as possible in order to restore these territories and return them to normal life. so i think that cluster munitions are evidence of exactly this this second feeling, well americans americans always act like this, when you 've seen something different. we live in our own world in europe. for example, we do not know the history of latin america in the 20th century, what the americans did there is terrible. but nevertheless, no one particularly pedals these topics, but their

use in laos in yemen in syria is these ammunition. it's already revealing. so far in vietnam. it's wonderful. we see these consequences, well, 60 years of consequences and the answer is clear vladimirovich, i remember the quote from the first deputy head of the presidential administration russian kirenko. yes, russia will win in the hot phase of the confrontation in ukraine, but the economic war will go on longer, and the most difficult battle. yes, it will be a war of meaning, an ideological war, and, moreover, the purpose of this war. our youth. here's what we can oppose, it's a promise, i agree. well , this is a classic, this is a classic situation related to the fact that we constantly say we are moving along the path of forming a multipolar world. moreover, when we

say this, we focus only on the positive, but on the fact that the world will become more fair more equitable, but we often miss out. and what precedes the creation of this multipolar world, and precedes, just this local conflicts that will be in the next decade. uh, appearing everywhere literally all over the world, and the second is a really tough economic confrontation to win the economic confrontation. we will have to create our own technological zone. we 'll have to recreate. all those sectors of the economy that are of key importance for the normal life of the activities of our society and our state, in fact , to restore what was lost in belarus . yes, it is possible. so much within the macro-region is the association of sovereign countries that voluntarily unite in the interests of creating a single market for a single logistics system. technological system. yes, we will have to create not

even recreate, but create a full-fledged technological zone of a full-fledged economic complex. this is the first and it is clear that it will develop under severe restrictive sanctions in the conditions of economic war. this is what kiriyenko is talking about, but no economy can be sustainable. there is no clear understanding yet. and where are we going. and what kind of society? we want to build. on what social principles is the most difficult thing for the sake of which we bear all these hardships. this is a matter of worldview. this is a matter of ideology. this is a question of the image of the future, if we do not formulate these questions that are understandable to everyone and understandable to both the academician and the ordinary student. we won't be able to move on. i want to tell you that this struggle is not even for the youth, their vision of the world is the key creation question. e macro-region, if there is no

future, how can countries be united into a single whole, that is, the question is still ideological and conceptual. thought the economy and defense are three elements that today determine the future of the state the problem is actually the problem then let's, maybe on a more pleasant question. now let's try the one that, thank god, is already coming, at least for belarus, the sco summit, which was literally just the day before iran was a kid for decades and was accepted into this organization as a full member. and why do experts call iran's membership in the sco fundamentally important, both for the country itself and for the organization, and who should get ready for the entrance good question, the sco is really a real attempt to stabilize the situation at

the regional level at the level of greater eurasia, well , there already is, uh, china india russia, the entry of iran essentially provides control over the south, moreover, the entry of iran, uh, creates , uh, prospects for the construction of transport corridors of logistical links that do not controlled by the strange west no way. and this is an exit both to the indian market and to africa. that is, these are serious. uh, let's say structural changes in the territory of eurasia is a regional organization that is being formed with global goals. they are 3.5 billion people in it, namely, the thing is the normal conditions for development in this difficult period of history.