let's talk globally about it. moreover, in this sense, a lot of things threaten us. this, of course, was the nato summit that started in vilnius, some kind of unhealthy, excitement this time, they started talking about it for a long time somewhere absolutely objectively. it deserves to be screwed up somewhere. well , for example, why don't we talk about it? if perishing as something, well, too close to us. here vadim is not accidental, you believe they chose several aspects closer to the borders of the union state. first, it means that they naturally show that we are close to minus here. asks for a permanent deployment, not a rotational, constantly reinforced grouping , troops, a nation near our borders, this is especially so that we are here, we are near, we are near, at the same time, we are scary, judging by the way they guarded vilnius. how many typewriters, dangers are not ready to lock everyone up, you understand, they are there on the outskirts, it is not visible that they will accompany them not in the very center, which means that, in essence, the first thing is here. the issue

of uh membership of ukraine is speculation. i just want to understand that everything is happening separately, let's talk. but what, what's going on regarding no one is planning to do this issue, let’s say, for the time being, because no one is interested in, let’s say, ukraine , e.g. bring. this special us military provocation in europe is at least 24 years old before the political processes in the russian federation. why it doesn’t supply weapons that’s what nato is discussing completely and quickly, they need to brew this mess and support the boiler fire, so that it’s not even beneficial for them, so that russia or ukraine doesn’t win, decisive victories because it’s you, well, on some battlefields, because it’s forced to sit down at the negotiating table. and they need to destabilize the region. it is natural to understand that this is a threat and designate our response. asymmetric but understand that we

will be destroyed from the inside in uh. well, let's talk about nato in more detail, we will discuss it very close to us, and we are somehow involved in the whole world in what they discussed there yesterday and today they continue long before kiev themselves began to repeat the mantra the essence of which we are taken to nato. if they don’t take us, firstly, it ’s not masculine, and secondly, zelensky is then offended and it’s clear that he didn’t kick, but he arrived, although it was already before the start. it is clear that even before the meeting, nato members are not taken, the german edition of the person reported that the united states and germany blocked ukraine's entry into nato, that is, first they inspired zelensky, then they land him on the other side. didn’t he understand that no one takes or where he got this idea that this topic is in general it may be relevant why it arose nikolaevich zelensky is a wonderful manipulator and a very good actor, i have already spoken on this topic more than once, but the ability to use

any information occasion to your advantage. it is very good for him, it turns out to be himself . if he outplayed, he would be sure that his bet would play out. what a player who clearly understood that at the moment he is a real tool in the hands of the euro-atlantic union for weakening russia to destabilize this region and he had many advantages, because, well, everything that he asked for, what he demanded, everything was given to him. pay attention to weapons of various types, starting there from javelins, ending with aircraft. we have discussed before. in this same studio, a question was asked somewhere a year ago. will the planes be given them and in the near future there will be more of them . this is not the point. the fact is that the reorganization of the world is underway, a real process is underway with the restoration

of a multipolar world, and ukraine has been chosen as an instrument by the west in order not to allow this today the reality is this. and zelensky believed in his exclusivity, so to speak, that he can, and he knows how to manipulate, certain hmm information flows, and to some extent zelensky, practically convinced himself and convinced a large piece of people or society, including foreign society, that without him, nowhere and this allowed him, among other things, to convince himself that he will achieve this decision within the framework of nato from interesting and at the same time disturbing messages on the eve of the macron said that the bet was the decision to transfer missiles to ukraine long-range for as he again explained the support for the offensive of the armed forces in the kremlin , i quote peskov. naturally,

this will force us to take countermeasures. this topic has already been discussed several times. at first , the uk spoke about it and gave the same missiles , yes, yes, this is in terms of their range in terms of their characteristics. they are comparable. after that, the same step was made, france she did not because she wants this to the macron, he must show his importance in europe, he must show that he is no worse, than the uk here. mm struggle for power in european. uh, let's say in the theater that it is stronger than germany, including france is fighting germany for leadership and so on, but this is nothing more. how, again, is the information stuffing on this wave to show how great we are, that we are ready to go to the end, and so on. no more than that, they will give rockets, we will already talk about this and dali and they will give and give everything that is possible , including everything that shoots everything that explodes will be delivered to ukraine not immediately about this. we have already said we must

the sequence of aggression to carry out the peak will be when there will be some kind of hacking of the situation in russia, it will be as soon as it will stagger. if this is what it is, it is clear that if russia now inflicted a crushing defeat, what alexander grigoryevich e spoke about during the counterattack , you laid down these main divisions there, which are still in reserve. of course, this, uh, would force kiev to negotiate and it’s not a fact that after this an agreement is reached. it would n't restart the situation after a while, but at the current moment they are waiting for hour x when the impact is maximum. and now they are probing a gap in the defense. and these are the cluster munitions that will be transferred by the united states. america, we'll probably talk about it later. it's like why in the first place to break through the defense. here is a military military commissar. in this case, he, if you read his telegram channel, referring to which is there on the front line , claims that the very announced bomb clusters are already being struck. that is, they are already there, according to people who there are with ivanovic how to find out look

at the threats that have increased after that self-confidence? no wonder they gave it and were afraid, how do you evaluate or overheated? i think that what is the complexity of the situation for nato and why were there such expectations from the summit on the part of ukraine, because yes, zelensky is an actor, but the most important thing in his position is not acting, but pure business, so he, besides that he is also an actor and a businessman says, well, he does business in politics. and what is the policy of ukraine, it is a weapon and an edge against russia, it is the west, what is the hat from the position of nato, now she needs to make such decisions so as not to get herself into trouble and realize and i say this word not to get into the third world war and continue the fire. confrontation with russia form e, a special military operation and hostilities in ukraine, therefore, ukraine needs to be supported in order for this escalation to continue and

continue in the right direction. yes, there were hopes that there would be a counter-attack, there will be some successes, there are no successes, except for seven the villages that they e liberated according to them , which are actually not, which are in a vulnerable position. uh, because they didn't capture heights. they are just settlements of the square, and now the war is not for the square, therefore, the program, uh, the maximum of the west which one is to destroy russia and right? the point of view was said here that it is necessary to create conditions for the internal collapse of russia, and when the events took place on june 23, yes, then there was a certain hope that this was the beginning, but they simply did not have time to it was all quickly alkalized, therefore , as a matter of fact. what is now, what has happened and is happening now a little more than a year ago, when we introduced a visa-free regime in relation to. uh, the baltic states, uh, after a

while poland. i here quoted the words of a simple citizen of lithuania who, by nationality, from belarus, was born there, and he said. what is different uh, the situation back. he says to lithuania from belarus that in belarus you have here trying to make a person out of any fool. with us, on the contrary, from a person make a fool. so, what is the point of vilnius itself, that they made a fool out of ukraine, not only from ukraine , i’ll tell you as an anecdote what is happening at the summit, which means, uh, local residents in lithuania noticed that old trolleybuses disappeared from the streets of vilnius 160 even czechoslovak production in the eighties appeared on the street like this, but still in this way. i wanted to show that the country is still ok, still the norm , a new technique has appeared, but the lithuanians themselves are outraged by such show-off a couple of examples of what and how they think about the brush, please, and why should we hide that

we are a poor country, and the grass will be painted ashamed, even while reading why hide what is ordinary why do you need to look better more beautiful. you really exist, you think that no one knows anything, that the world's millionaires do not know how lithuanians live. what a terrible backwardness everywhere is a disgrace. so close pensioners with the poor, otherwise it will ruin the image. well, you know, how immediately, when you look at such a picture on the seat of his complex. the main thing is to like this byte, probably, the logic is like that. you know complexes. maybe he is a modest person, but i would like to say that he knows there , so that his colleague zelensky would probably succeed here, he would show everything and ask for money, but here, well, from this, like this, in this way. yes, behind such a facade hides, indeed, the true problem of the country. a. we know that if you leave a lot of people there are not enough jobs , the economy is not very good, maybe

you should have thought about your citizens to show problems to focus, of course, of course, they now have a completely different problem. they see their binoculars as an enemy, a union state for them, we are enemies. although historically we have always lived side by side and could be wonderful neighbors, yes, russia and so on. well, we'll live and see. but speaking more about ourselves, if you'll let me hmm well, after all, somewhere it warmed the soul that it was written in the communiqué that, and today the alliance does not seek confrontation with russia it also seems to me such a signal that the third world war . we do not want we are not idiots. eh, vadim was talking about that they do not want negotiations, yes, that is , they cannot allow negotiations between russia and ukraine , you know who knows him today? look, no matter how there was a counteroffensive. it well,

there are no obvious results that the alliance was waiting for from ukraine, they are not there, what will happen? tomorrow we don't know, uh, i'm certainly not a military expert but analyzing the opinion of military experts. i think that this is not a long-range weapon, which has already been additionally provided to france , not cluster weapons. ah, ammo. they won't decide anything on the battlefield. yes, there will be more there will be more victims today. uh, maybe, uh, the united states of america wants to save face somewhere. you understand, if suddenly russia wins, but suddenly who loses america and not, there are two options for ukraine to win today, either in a long game, and then we'll see, or before the twenty-fourth year. still, you need to think and come up with some option on how to get out of this situation in america. still , it’s more beautiful, it seems that he didn’t play and at the same

time, so that, somehow, this situation change a little, but let's wait and see. after all, what does the president say today that let's sit down at the negotiating table. and even in principle, it assumes that such negotiations between russia and ukraine will be possible. autumn, i would really like it to be the first. naturally. i am a supporter of the position of alexander lukashenko from the first day, we are supporters of negotiations, but i want to tell you this, any military man is more likely a specialist, uh, and any such project that was prepared not one, but not one year. there are several scenarios, practically there are, scenario, cover-ups and so on. and russian american ideologists are ready to justify everything with them. if it is necessary to explain any event, they have already learned how to manipulate the mass consciousness from all sides, so let's get down to business. now what will happen? as i think, naturally, we will facilitate the negotiations as much

as possible. the question is what contractual position will the parties have if your contractual position is unbalanced and one of the parties is dissatisfied. they will leave you minus windy action. well, that's right, the sooner we sit down and stop the b- collision. it will be better anyway, but the task, in my opinion, of the united states of america, we should not join nato and unite this entire group of more than thirty states, as one whole these are different groups. there are major interests. this is the united states, their allies, canada, which means, uh. well, they are, respectively , great britain. here they are, on this now, they are heating their pens. there is an impact force. ukraine has a reserve. this is primarily in poland in the first place. poland has those who pay for bills, it's europe paying for this whole gig not the us paying europe and the us has an interest in making it look like they're interested in stabilizing this situation. once again i say to drag out the conflict, at least until the political campaign of 24 years in russia, to pump

the situation from the inside, not a single country in the world can be in a state of constant mobilization for an endless time. now they are their first task. look at 58% of the world's reserves in the dollar indirect direct calculations 88% of the world's calculations in the dollar. and that's all they are saved thanks to this military operation , they took control of the energy of the european union, which are not idiots, or what? why stop it? therefore, they will only stop if they see an immediate threat. i have been saying all this for a year and a half, until they feel threatened. here they will tilt europe and push e ukraine into the ashes of war. unfortunately, and we must do everything to ensure that what your colleague says about following the negotiating table, the more time passes we see, it’s really impossible to disagree with you that we we see for all hmm the action of the west and the supply of cluster munitions before that. this is with combined uranium and so on and so forth, they need ukraine as a military base under the guise

of the state to double assistance. now let's listen to the president. the further, the further this situation goes, the less promising the discussion about peace becomes for ukraine. the president spoke about this . they asked him questions. foreign journalists asked about it. as you see the situation , here is a small fragment of what the president answered today from ukraine talk and reach some peace agreements. i mean, not so much belarus e as russia, she will talk after the so-called counteroffensive. the situation will change and whether they want to talk to you zelensky lived for concrete, they said we will support you , we will arm you, we will give you as much money as you need never to quit. and then zelensky's wings appeared, he flew. what's going on? now he finally understood that

he would not win this war. there is a legend that on the other side of the screen it seems that here all the questions are easy, come to us. i'm sure. you will change your mind this show, which has humor excitement and agility they are sharp. they get it like this, you know the answer. perhaps it was leonov must be exactly then without the possibility. spongebob squarepants has a best friend, what's his name?

they chose an atypical path for many and passed enough tests. i was sure that i would not do this. i was 100% sure, and now, as it were, i even tried to quit a couple of times, so far it doesn’t work, because , well, i like sent letters to publishing house. there were just answers here, well, percent, where 10 is just the answer that we considered, but the manuscript did not fit under such and such reasons to overcome difficulties, and most importantly, you and your fears were worth it in order to reveal the uniqueness and become the best in your business, you need to do so that

people can see and not be able to pass further. that's what they should want. they must sleep to see that this thing, that this work is fake more and more. nowhere in the world, it seems to me the right and only time to go into writing. it's not with idea. i want to keep my book in my hands or earn stereotypes. there is still a nato summit, it is being discussed now . we will soon know what happened there today, but the situation. in another, i personally, as a person who deals, in

general, with geopolitical geostratic issues, was very much cut by the topic of escalation of tension. it is traced in all decisions. especially in the joint decision it is necessary. note. today they are no longer talking about europe or the north atlantic space. they say about world space and as one of its promising, so to speak, e. the opponents are called china and china is completely on the other side. so let's say our large eurasian continent. what this means is that no one is going to, uh, stop using the force factor in political battles. this is the first moment of the second moment. e clearly in the nato joint statement there is a paragraph stating that it supports the option to get out of the political situation,

proposed by ukraine that it says this to return everything back to normal again and next to the russian federation there will appear a nato member with the appropriate infrastructure and appropriate training, which will continue to pursue the policy of expanding and destroying everything russian that has been throughout all these years. the third point, as regards, again, the prospects for the near future , no one is talking about how we are now discussing the issue of the negotiation process, the peace process. they don't talk about it. they condemn belarus and russia for hosting nuclear weapons. they talk about what needs to be back to before everything that has been fucked up for a long time. sorry to everyone they say they need to be concerned about what's going on here, but no one talks about we stop supplying arms. this is

the main point that should be discussed today. even if they already have enough. well, its reserves are small , in fact, compared to what it was, they were sure that this would be enough to bring russia to its knees in order to destabilize the situation in russia and in order for russia to destroy its state once again by an internal coup. and this was the main calculation and is not removed. he continues the question of the game in a long year for them - it's called fu. this is a very short conversation about the five-year period, maybe for decades they are ready for this, because as soon as the ukrainian events end. god forbid, in their opinion, in the interests of russia , russia will solve its strategic tasks. everything will fall down the whole world based on the rules. they know about it, link topics, but here on

against this backdrop, the college we touched on fragments of the press conference. it doesn’t even look ridiculous when foreign journalists during an interview again talked about the last dictator. on the road. reuters journalists. it's so tempting to ask, are you kidding or something, one goes to john's concert when paris is on fire, the other endlessly freaks out publicly experiencing dementia. here it is again. let's take a look at klinil's canoe, if you're wondering, otherwise i'm kicking the bleachers doesn't work. how about this someone may not like macron bytes, zelensky at some point notices lukashenka. we must already change today before me no i am not so. and if the dictator is not the last, well, while we hide all this from the biden, the old macron trolleybuses. he himself hides from the wrath of the people, he is lukashenka in the shops, mogilev is left-handed and talks about earthly

things about the development of production markets. i mean, that's exactly what he meant. here is vladimir ivanovich alexander lukashenko when he said that life without war is the result of painstaking daily work. first, according to the dictator lukashenka does not reign. he serves the people and the country. this proves the result of that 29-year term. what country did he get 29 years ago, when law enforcement agencies wiped their feet. in the center of the capital , the palace of the republic stood like a crumbling fence, next to it , the kupalovsky theater collapsed, economy on the shoulder blades , pensioners queuing for groceries. and today we are on a number of indices. he is the world's first minimal child maternal death natures best access to education to the service healthcare. the gap in the cis countries between the upper strata of society, so to speak , the wealthy and the less wealthy, then all questions of national security and stability. so this is the kind of country we

are building. power is based on the following principles: money and resources are strength. and this is consent in society, social stability, for which lukashenka says that we want peace, let's do quality work if we don't have a strong economy. we will not have the funds to buy the necessary or produce the necessary resources. we will not have the means to provide and support the power bloc and we will not have the means to maintain socio-political stability, therefore , in our belarusians, we keep peace in lukashenka's power. they will do everything they can to compare two comparisons right before their eyes. we've discussed this before. and now we are discussing what is happening here. we see that he is gathering himself there, this nato team. he is hiding the old trolleybus instead of dealing with problems here. we are too many internal issues could be attributed to the fact that we really need to spend more on the army to ensure security and close a lot of social services now

, and the president would sit there from morning to evening somewhere at the headquarters and deal with the situation belongs, the route belongs to the national groups. you don't even have to discuss it with them. everything is clear. what was it for, so that citizens understand, we introduce here. so take a tactical separate weapon here. in order, among other things, to spend less money on confidential weapons. so we can apply an asymmetric response and uh, that allows us to stretch out over time. uh, the rearmament of our armed forces, the strengthening of our grouping, but they know that it is impossible to climb here today. we have weapons that can seriously damage our security. we are talking about ours, we kept the peace on the belarusian land, not a single belarusian soldier set foot on foreign land during the time of non-dependence. uh, it was for waging war for with peacekeeping functions that there were injections into

kazakhstan, we, as a uh member of the csto, went out and provided assistance, but we see what what what the essence of these decisions that nato made they made a decision regarding ukraine what all are against us all the decisions against us they decided to increase there by half . uh, military assistance in the supply of weapons. it plays against us. they shortened the path to nato for ukraine. and most importantly, they decided that they would accept ukraine into nato when the hostilities were over , when the hostilities were going on. we are not interested in this, and russia is not interested either. interested in fighting. and when we agree, well, russia will agree, uh, with ukraine there will be a truce, it will remain a country and nato is also playing against us, that is, not a single decision is made in not us and the union state of belarus and russia, uh, nato has not been accepted, that is, they are working for escalation, therefore, what is important for us is to ensure

our national security in all areas, including the economic one, and why the president now and in mogilev-liftmash , visits fields and farms, because we export-oriented state will not be economic, one rightly said we will not have everything else , therefore we not only must support our economy, but we must also maintain and develop opportunities for growth not only in economic terms, but also politically and culturally and like a nation. we must develop we have achieved a lot in e. during our independence, we have built a sovereign country and the main task in the message is clearly formulated and we are confident that the independence of the belarusian state and do something for it. we e need to do. we all understand. yes, i need. to make it so that there is stability in society, so that we develop further, so that, uh, we improve as a nation. we have everything for this, we have a nuclear power plant, we have

space, we flew. we have something to be proud of, but we must continue to develop. they hide in the buses there is no one, see the formula was sounded in mogilev from the president by the lack of discipline. what alexander ivanovich was talking about, the lack of discipline is a failure, a failure. this war all begins with economy, that's why nato nato is needed like this, like this is the formula that was proposed or voiced by the president. she, in principle, has been voiced by him for a decade. pay attention. you watch the president's speech. for at least the last 5 years. before that, maybe 10 years. after all, this is the main thing if there is stability. if there is. e understanding, if there is responsibility at any level from the lowest to the highest there is a state. if there is a state, there is. there are appropriate forces to ensure national security appropriate resources for the development and formation and, probably, stable

stable development of the state. and here i would like to draw attention to another phrase. after all, the president says not only national security, but also the development of the country depends on everyone - this is true. we have a people's state. there is a powerful spike between the authorities and the people, so we are still alive and developing, and i would probably not add such a thesis to this, but i added a postulate, if we had not been interfered with, we would have been unknown at the level of development of belarus if we weren't forced to turn to incomprehensible neighbors to nato who are constantly rattling weapons. and all this resource was directed to the development of the state today. we are no worse here than in the emirates. or maybe better marina alexandrovna yes, you know, i'll hold nikolai ognevich, indeed the president speaks about this clearly and understandably. and you can even cite a couple of his

such, uh, capacious statements, and stop there. here is his favorite. get undressed and work, work, do everything, and give me the economy everything else. i will do for you. he really emphasized that the economy is very important, it will develop, we will have everything and we will have a pension, we will have, uh, wages. oh, our country will develop. you know, despite all the difficulties that we face today, despite the unprecedented sanctions pressure. i, unfortunately, forgot. and whose statistics were these, but the statistics were foreign and belarus got into the top 10 countries, yes, the top 10 countries for hmm yes , you understand moving from life among there among canada world eighth eighth british, i just wanted to emphasize what kind of boundary statistics it means, we are doing everything right, but of course

we must go ahead and work and understand that we must and it is very important to do this. and of course, do not relax today is the time. thank you very much for, uh, participation in our program, in general, the program itself is still going on in a couple of minutes, another interlocutor. today we have russian political scientist sergei mikheev so see you. thank you very much with us in touch russian political scientist sergei mikheev sergei alexandrovich hello who apparently , foreign journalists recently tried to torture the belarusian president by placing tactical nuclear weapons in belarus. well , in general, alexander lukashenko said everything about the interests of our country, but what tasks does russia solve in this way? well, as far as i see it. yes, i cannot answer, so to speak, for the whole of russia, the russian authorities. but as far as i

can see, this is, in general, a forced measure. yes, that is, uh, here to think, uh, what is it it means that moscow has dreamed all her life of placing nuclear weapons there in belarus and moving them to the territory, so to speak, to another state. well, somehow naive, it is clear that this measure is forced to be connected. she is with the pressure that she is exerting on both russia and belarus on the allied states. oh, and this measure, which should, apparently, give a signal that, in principle, russia is ready for the most stringent measures. she pushes her most. uh, it means that the most serious powerful forces, as it were, are pushing closer to the borders of nato. that is, this is a measure of containment nato, that's actually and that's it. yes, this is the first second, i think that we are showing nato that in the event of aggression against belarus, russia will defend this territory, among other things. because nuclear weapons are stationed here, that is, uh, if uh, well, the enemy, uh, let

's call it directly, decides, for example, let's say from belarus to do about the same thing as with ukraine and even move closer to the borders russia there for a couple there for a couple of thousand kilometers, yes or for a couple of hundred kilometers, yes, then russia uh, including poets reason it will react as harshly as possible, that is, the first is the containment of nato, the second is an unequivocal hmm signal that any actions are against belarus. yes, russia will be regarded as practically aggression against russia, and it will, uh, react harshly to this. and so, in general, and in general, of course, everything, this is not from a good life. yes, and. naturally. everyone would like to live peacefully, so to speak , to trade with each other, so to speak, and so on, but, in general, in fact, of course, this is all from the field illusions. so, so, so, so, sweet, as if smooth, never was, and apparently never will be. the fact of moving tactical nuclear weapons is in itself such a symbol of trust and mutual support. and that

means a very definite signal, which they will also receive there. trust. yes, of course, this is a very serious trust here, to be honest, it is even impossible to come up with more serious measures of trust, because in fact we are showing that the belarusian people are for president lukashenko and his team. we trust the keys, including number from their own destiny. that's what is important, yes, that is, a little. neither less nor more nor less. i think that here, er, there can be no two opinions, this factor of having these weapons on our territory can give such a long-term effect, but the impact on the enemy. well, it’s hard to say here, because this is exactly the situation in which the war that russia is waging and this conflict that russia is waging with ukraine and in fact with nato, which is using ukraine as a consumable. she goes like this such a rather specific style that raises questions. well, including

me, for example, yes, you know some kind of such an infantry war using conventional weapons, and that's it. this made it possible for our adversaries to believe that nuclear weapons could never be used. i think that such a delivery of the question is not profitable. not to us, and not to belarus, to anyone. yes, i think that our adversary must understand that nuclear weapons would not be very desirable if they were ever used, but what is it can be applied applied and let's hope that this step in relation to belarus yes will make them think about this topic. although, again, as for me, the operation in ukraine, of course, should move in more paradoxical ways for opponents, less predictable, less calculated , plus there is a polish factor. more , of course, i decided that she caught to your luck, a chance to build some kind of huge huge zone of polish influence. i do not say i will not talk about the commonwealth because as for me. e, to be honest, the polish elite e cannot even manage ukraine, even if

it suddenly gets, so to speak, such such opportunities are one of the problems of the elite console, historical. this is her inner malice. extremely polish nationalism, if you like, in fact, like any other extreme nationalism. he always narrows , uh, the scale of decision-making, that is, on the one hand. he. maybe, uh, it means, at the same time , somewhere in a limited area , a limited time, so to speak, to give, but a certain effect, but in general. uh, radical nazi elites have never been capable of building such large large and viable hmm political projects. this is one of the reasons why the polish project fails, as it were, from century to century, they seem to have something. then, once again, everything starts to fall apart. yes? it seems to me that this is from some kind of internal inferiority, to be honest, here, but now it seems to the poles that they can manage ukraine, they can stand in charge there. they can increase their roles in this case, er, in their own in europe and here, of course, in belarus is a potential target for aggression. let's be honest, yes,

it's not for nothing that they have been talking about us for so many years. so the molotov-ribbentrop pact and that's it. consider offended for good reason. they support the belarusian position and everything connected with it, and now they are also asking the americans to place nuclear weapons on the territory of poland. so i think that, of course, these are also signals to the poles, whether they can , again, to your question about whether they can comprehend it. uh, well, i think that u should in theory, but maybe we lack a little rigidity, so to speak, sharpness and, uh, unpredictability. e in your actions. but this is my personal opinion. yes, i think that we act too predictably too linearly and sometimes our moves, as it were, and our motives, so to speak. they too calculate the enemies, in general, all these games are in gentlemen. here, as for me. we must finish. well, you touched on the topic that the polish authorities are trying to convince older fans to host nuclear weapons in such a way that here moscow-minsk is transmitting and now we also need it, but another question. here, will they give them this weapon? here's your version will go to this west well, let's still rearrange

these positions a little here, but in fact the poles. about and before russia accepted. this is the decision such conversations were made by colleagues asked about a serious increase in the military presence of americans on the territory of poland yes, as it were, about building a whole system of military bases there and all that, and to a certain extent , the answer to precisely these things was the decision on the russian metronome weapons of belarus yes, that's why the question here is what it meant, the first chicken or the egg, it is important in my opinion. yes, but all the same, these measures are retaliatory in nature, i say again , there are quite big risks for russia. yes, and therefore she went through these things, as it were, yes, because there really are serious dangers. serious dangers exist quite seriously. will the americans give nuclear weapons to the poles? i think no. by the way, this is also interesting. i think that moscow trusts minsk much more than washington in warsaw, that's actually and that's it. yes, including, because

once again i repeat the polish elite is stricken with some kind of illness, you know, so to speak. such is the inner malice. and by the way, ukrainian nationalism in a strange way. e seems to be like being, uh, it means that he adopted a lot as a counterweight there or, let's say, an antagonist to polish nationalism. eh, hell. uh, and even in the worst form of polish nationalism. this is an incredible limitation. so to speak. sometimes absolutely stupid malice. here, uh, and willingness there to go on the most absurd steps. even though it might be, if you count ahead, it will, uh, become a problem there. well, for example, let's say directly, as it were, before but they refer to the eve of the second world war, so to speak, the great patriotic war, when poland played a serious role. e is what happened is what happened in the end. the first agreement, similar to the fact of a hammer or a ventrop, was concluded by the poles. uh, with hitler, as it were, yes, and not at all the soviet union of warsaw and berlin did this, therefore. eh,

going back to your question, so to speak. i very much doubt that the americans went for it. these are too big risks, too big risks, especially against the backdrop of ambition , meanwhile, in general , escalation is observed in other areas. we see that, from a fresh macron, he said that paris had decided to transfer long- range missiles to ukraine. for, as he said, support for the offensive of the armed forces in the kremlin, the day before , peskov reacted naturally. this will force us, uh, to take countermeasures. and here the question really arises. how to answer here in the telegram they have already begun to joke that maybe it's time the french rebels in paris to receive support in the form of manpads and grenades, but it’s actually not funny in this situation. here, how do you see it? well, these are missiles for trying to strike deep into russian territory, in my opinion. uh macron. uh, like many other european, so to speak, current politicians admit e great stupidity

, because france will not get anything from this, absolutely nothing, to the question, what does europe get from the fact that she plays these games, absolutely nothing, yes, the americans, uh, achieve certain goals. and then here one can argue, yes, and the europeans only lose, because they expose the situation closer and closer. this is a big war in europe. i hope that it will not happen, because they are sent there for one thing. so to say, weapons and ammunition to ukraine is another thing to directly participate themselves, but er, that way they really make the situation. more and more dangerous. it really is. although, i believe that we and i are leading the russian side. of course, we spoiled them a little in this sense, because if more decisive an unambiguous very beginning of a special operation, maybe it would have been on its course. others from the very beginning. it seems to me that we should have been more resolute in regard to political leadership. uh, it means uh ukraine yes, and now what we will introduce ourselves, you know

, again, somehow we all play such gentleman's games, like, well, we are there , somewhere there, that means in the east ukraine are fighting, and everyone else can feel safe. yes, zelensky goes wherever he wants, so to speak, macron, that wants to allocate europeans to americans. uh, so, uh don't feel any problem with everything that's happened, it gives them a sense of permissiveness. well, what, let's put more such missiles, but russia hasn't done anything specifically to us. let's put these. russia has also done nothing in this sense. uh, the only , by the way, in my opinion, a really serious step is precisely this transfer of part of our weapons to belarus, nato themselves in vilnius , and kiev, as we saw, was very prepared, moreover it was like that, you know, and the multi-genre performance was a bit of a thriller, when they pumped up the theme of strikes on a nuclear power plant a little. tragicomedies, when zelensky promised not to come if the partners, well, they don’t show themselves like a man, they won’t accept him into nato, but we see that, in principle, they are not expected there. first, the american edition, even earlier

forino, feyer conveys hmm the general mood that reigns in the west, and she wrote that the united states needs to close the nato door to ukraine because the risks are higher than the benefits. well, then the build just mercilessly hits the forehead when publishes that the united states germany has blocked ukraine's entry into nato, well, you see that zelensky does not give up, firstly , such people come from where such a sergey alexandrovich hype around the current meeting comes from. nato does not have the feeling that we are talking about some kind of decisive stakes. first yes , with regard to the admission of ukraine to nato in my opinion. uh, now they are linking this issue with the success or failure of the ukrainian counteroffensive, in my opinion. nato would not have taken ukraine in any case not in one case not in another case not in case of success. whatever the case no success, this is a game now im going to design a pr scheme, this is a pr scheme two.

things of all new weapon packages is to build such a pr scheme, so to speak. for example, there is a council of ukraine to a council of ukraine of nato, what will mean, so to speak, in reality, what powers it will have is not at all clear. yes? there will probably be some. well , in short, zelensky should apologize to bring to kiev, uh, it almost means that nato almost accepted our victory, which is why the kulebs say this, here. how can you prove what to say? so we almost got it right and then he will list in all these pr designs, so to speak, that we are now on peas there for advice. uh, ukraine is some kind of simplified procedure for this. although it is also clear. why it will consist is a simplified procedure. and when it becomes possible. yes, i think such a thing, looking around. here are all the topics that we discussed with you belarus russia here is what we need to focus attention on now first of all? sovereignty sovereignty in everything yes, first of all, the sovereignty of thought. yes, you need to unlearn

in the end, constantly check your actions, your way of life, your way of thinking with someone who is there, as it were, somewhere beyond the cordon, because in my opinion it is not sovereignty. e thoughts e of the russian political elite in the first place. yes, to a large extent, it led to the situation in which we find ourselves in the second sovereignty of the economy. we need to learn to either reproduce what was once or learn to do from scratch. eh, it is strategically important to say so, yes to things! uh, machine tools equipment aircraft, so to speak, cars and so on. uh, to become as sovereign as possible in this to develop their own production. we need to be sovereign in politics. we need to be sovereign in terms of defense and self-sufficient defense. this is something that will undoubtedly be very relevant throughout the 21st century. we need to be ourselves feel like a civilization of self-sufficiency. accurate while being open where needed, but not allowing you to ride on your neck. that's what is important to do is to draw

very serious conclusions from thirty soviet years and seriously change. yes, change in the direction of civilizational identity, and therefore strength. thank you very much for participating in our program, the russian political scientist sergei mikheev was with you. well, as an ellipsis, two events of the week, as if from different universes although geographically within easy reach, the kiev region, armed with grinders with sledgehammers and gas canisters , demons continued to squeeze out orthodox possessions, this time preobrazhensky cathedral, white church. at the same time, at the competition in holland, the title of miss netherlands for the first time get a man. yes, you heard right guys. now also miss 22-year-old transgender.

valerik kohle will now represent the netherlands in the miss universe pageant that's when i look at these two events. even you, many others tell me, for example, the burning ship of sweden , i can’t get rid of the idea that we were all fooled by humanity, infected with tolerance, which in fact turned out to be a trojan stone. now we see how it works. give us your shrines, and in return , beauty queens and converted men. they ukrainians will save ukraine to the last. not because they need this state, they need souls and less agree that today everything is happy. kalise

is in nature, the light is lost in silence, then lowered and only sang to the wind to pester in your ear, as you flared up out of the understanding of silence. cool cars go to nature near the forest near the field on the river and lakes. sew fresh in the wind. get pissed off me with demons. listen to sonic. for malt due respect on lokomo. about harmony with

nature belarus 20 shatyry belarusians are better the mass-sport car crew led by sergei vizovich won one of the most prestigious races on the planet , the silk road rally raid and interrupted the 12-year hegemony of rivals from the russian kamaz , the president of the country alexander lukashenko congratulated the team on this success. we add that the company also managed to become