that the bas-reliefs, which are very reminiscent of snails, symbolize unfinished construction? it is immediately obvious that pushkin is respected in the city from those classics of russian literature, only he honored the monuments with one monument, a folk path has not been erected to him, and next to it is a bench for arguing lovers, but it’s time for us, our friend, it’s time. there is no peace, the heart asks, but only takes away into the depths of the city. victory square is perhaps not only the largest square in the city, but also belarus occupies the third place in europe, second only to samara and warsaw, 85-meter pools and fountains and victory square in them quiet water is peacefully built as

a symbol of shed tears and eternal life. during the great patriotic war, vitebsk was destroyed by 93% of the 180,000 population, only 118 people survived , when the american expert commission arrived in vitebsk after the war , representatives of the red cross said that the next city is dead and cannot be restored around the city a necklace of dead bodies smolensk. they took 100 years. they didn't give any vikusku for restoration chances, but the city from the ruins of ashes. reborn, where it stood for centuries. today, all the city's landmark events take place on victory square , because earthlings celebrate the new year here . victory day. the birthday of the city, which, by the way, coincides with the day of liberation from the german fascist invaders. free concerts of the slavic bazaar. they also take place here, but

the main events undoubtedly take place on the concert stage of the waiters, let's look there. the slavic bazaar has long been the hallmark of the city, and the summer theaters are not only the main attraction, but also the brand of vitebsk , the amphitheater was built in record time. short terms for 6 months, but without a roof will appear later. ideas to cover the site of the slavic bazaar were proposed by yuri luzhkov and not without reason during the festival days. i will be the city often rejoice to tears. so the former mayor of moscow was lucky to get under the torrential. as a result, the roof was erected without the participation of the politician, however, in memory of him, the townspeople. they still call the amphitheater roof, luzhkov's cap

. here, on the stage, the voices of birds are clearly audible, moreover, unusual chirping, but threatening cries. scientists have developed these sound signals specifically for them. unlike the shorik, the bird is not sorry. amphitheater playground, outdoor equipment. it's expensive here. so fly birds. fly anywhere, but not in the direction of the festival stage, signs in which yours will understand the signal of approaching wealth do not believe in this territory. special attention deserves the festival avenue of stars, which has long turned into a square that welcomes guests to the garage of the goddess nika is a symbol of victory at the creative malinka and next to the avenue of stars is another attraction, although not. there are three of them here 16 years ago, three presidents in belarus, ukraine, russia, were imprisoned. these three trees, birch, linden and chestnut. i think everyone

understands who planted what. in front of the concert venue, a huge field is filled in. in winter, a skating rink is flooded here, and a hundred years ago , ivan legalovlov's circus showed its brilliant circus numbers on this place, the press of that time wrote extraordinary artistry, and in our time, the honored artist of russia, the former air gymnast du soleil nikolai chelnokov. he proposed to perpetuate circus art and such a talisman of vitebsk appeared, if you touch a cheerful clown by the nose, you will spend the whole day in a good mood along the rows. harmonies to the harmonies of personal life shake the dog's paw, you will always have a real true friend nearby. come and you will discover your own, vitebsk

andrey vladimirovich good evening good evening is over, the long-awaited for our opponents of the year nato summit vilnius game of words that's how it was christened the door to nato for ukraine is open so they said, yes, but either the hinges will be fastened together. yes, or you have to go with your feet. well, it won’t work

anymore, politicians competed in a hype of statements, but in the case, only in the bottom line. the consent of the turks to the entry of sweden zelensky was offended already on the first day, as a result, here is the question. how long will this door for ukraine be kept open, and when will it finally rip off the hinges of the most evil onon, well, i would like here in your question there are two such important topics. the first summit confirmed. uh, the real situation things, more precisely, his case was revealed in the fact that no one is going to accept ukraine in nato and was not going to. and nato was not going to already control this territory and has full power in this territory. e leads. uh, military operations manage them, uh, supply intelligence information there , supply weapons there, zelensky follows all orders. uh, roughly speaking, the countries

of the collective west. it is completely controlled and it has only one task to supply ukrainian military personnel to the conflict zone, like as cannon fodder, more tasks no, and here he is completely in control of all these big words and so on. this is nothing more than a pr image. moreover , i am convinced that this first image is consistent with the main hegemon. he is allowed to do so. why because he needs to maintain control over the ukrainian e state machine over society? and for this you need the image of such a strong guy who is not shy and loudly declares the needs of ukraine, who kicks, uh, excites, so to speak, european politicians. and here is such a shirt, you know, a guy who fights for everything good against everything bad , such an image is created for him, but in reality he

is completely controllable and i am sure that on a personal level he perfectly understands that ukraine will not be admitted to nato. why? because now ukraine is sacrificing its citizens for the sake of nato interests, and if ukraine suddenly ends up in nato, it turns out that you have to fight for ukraine. and this is unacceptable for them, but you don’t have the feeling that zelensky is being leaked. i absolutely have the feeling that zelensky is alive while fighting. you see, the important point here is that zelensky does not represent any value for you; he is a function, yes, uh, he merges all of ukraine. ukraine is needed. only for now. it can offer real resistance to russia and slow down russia's pace of creating its own macro-region of its own regional association, while this is happening ukraine needs. but they actually

already live exclusively on external support , there will be no arms supplies. uh, the war will collapse within a week. well, they themselves are called there, well, roughly speaking in one day something. uh, the moment of a certain live 10 years ago we will return passed with the eastern partnership itself. you remember very well and then claimed that there would be an agreement by yanukovych . the congress did not sign yes or no, then there was a maidan war, devastation. right now everyone was waiting to see if ukraine would be signed into nato well, i mean, those who are not dedicated. yes, the expectation was also not signed. here, is it worth waiting after this vilnius rendezvous with serious consequences and a new round of conflict. well, this is a very interesting question. uh, i wondered more all questions. and what can this new round of conflict mean from my point of view.

uh, let's say the only means that nato has left is to introduce regular troops, at least the western parts of ukraine in this way, bringing closer the possibility of even the conflict itself, russia needs it, but this was not done. this suggests that western countries cannot and do not dare to aggravate the conflict, so they will act along the already established e -track, that is, they will continue to supply weapons and share intelligence information will stimulate the arrival of mercenaries from these countries, but nothing fundamentally new will happen. and it seems to me that they themselves should show it. well, that is, these here were first jiveli. super weapons then, uh, there are leopard patriots, maybe missiles will definitely test new weapon systems. that is, this landfill is profitable

. it is a landfill. but yes, it's a landfill. but it's still keeping the conflicts the same. eh, within the previous framework, without cardinal changes, without qualitative changes, as you said , this is also a very important point. we must still this is to emphasize, because the war is on, not russia with ukraine the war is on the national state of russia with the collective countries of the west well, that is, roughly speaking, russia is fighting for its survival. in this case , the west must also be fighting for its survival. since a group of global financial oligarchs is controlled by and large, uh, who understand that the system on which they built their wealth will not be able to continue to exist, it can also collapse and this is someone's ontological conflict. will go without a doubt it seemed a little strange that in dominica and nato, on the basis of the results themselves, it was softer than, let's say, a

joint eu statement. that is why the united kingdom is not included in the eu. yes, the united states is naturally not included, but it turns out that europe in this case is working out. let's just say the role of the bad guy. can you say that? don't think. rather , it is with this sign of the desperation of the case that very interesting changes of transformation occur. global. uh, the countries of the collective west tried to impose on the world. e new new globalization of non-globalization under called inclusive capitalism. well, it didn’t work out, and now they will have to recreate this architecture in the macro-region that they control, but the architecture is always the same , there is always a core that has a more privileged position, which has better financial economic conditions and there is always a periphery that will be robbed, from which

take resources. uh, human potential and so on sad before in the global world. the periphery was southeast africa. asia countries. cis finally, yes, and now i have to do this within the limits of only the zone that they control. who do you think they have identified as the periphery of the continental eu, it will probably start with poland and the baltic states, and then it will go further. i think unfortunately this germany and france is everything except for the uk. well, it's brexit on time. they are overseers already over the continents and this process has already started everything. the germans are already sounding the alarm that they are leaving, uh, german concerns enterprises are creating production anywhere, last article the big one came out literally. yesterday, the chemical industry is leaving germany for the us in china well for the wool, so scholz was very reserved. i think he doesn't know what

to do and he doesn't have the freedom of choice. he is completely in control. here is the situation. she paints the real picture. there is no independence in the eu, there is no sovereignty for western countries. you will notice how they walked around the biden, even on this same met it immediately becomes. it is clear who in this camp makes the decision and these decisions are not disputed was such a general secretary. nato over. yes, now he is really an adviser to zelensky and on issues of interaction with the eu , in front of vilnius itself, he openly called for a strange bloc. form a coalition for direct participation in hostilities. yes, in ukraine and why this topic was not even discussed, it just shows that the west is not ready for an escalation of the conflict and in a direct clash with russia, and this

shows another very important fact. this battlefield for the west is not the main conflict. e will take place along the us line china and they openly say this that china has both the potential and resources to change the current world order, the united states of america perceives china as a contender for hegemony. and this means that they need to leave europe slowly and reorient their resources towards confrontation with china. that is, can we say that they did not expect that this ukraine-russia situation would drag on here completely. this is an amazing thing. history repeats itself. every time the west counts on a close cry. and you don't get it every time. why this is a mystery to me personally, but i want to draw one more attention here. the thing is that we are used to looking at the situation on the battlefield, but the main battlefield

is economic. they were counting on the fact that the russian economy would collapse within six months , this did not happen. we even see it in the economy of belarus e. all branches of industry are beginning to develop, moreover, a strategic plan for the future is being laid at a faster pace. we are becoming more autonomous in the union. with russia, we are actually restoring a certain production that we have lost in this liberal globalization. this and this is visible. and here they have already failed, they have not achieved success. they understand that there are no more resources. and we need to reorient them to the main fight. well, winter has a lot to show. you know, i remember. here is a statement by president duda against this background that after the end of the armed conflict in ukraine, nato can send a peacekeeping mission there. yes, in which the polish military units would also be accepted. here

what he is talking about, how to expand it. from diplomatic to russian, well, i would agree on how this is a problem in that this is also a variant of hysteria. e. in what sense they cannot afford to imagine a situation where russia wins and takes control of all this territory, they still dream of freezing this conflict. they hope that in this way they will buy time for rearmament. e ukraine and will be able to gain control over the golitsy critical dream. more imperial. poland is not peoples. more. i think this is rather reflects these inner desires and inner fears. and i think these statements are also being made to reinforce that line. why because they see changes fundamental policy changes.

they see fundamental changes in status. to europe and even more so to eastern europe, within the framework of this western bloc, and they are very afraid of this. i can’t help but ask you again about erdogan’s opposition. well , he gave consent to the swedish chair in nato. and now what are the prospects for turkey itself? entry into the eu after all from the ninety-ninth year, yes, 24 years, they are already waiting. i am very sympathetic. e to president erdogan. not even because i worked as an ambassador there, but because he is a politician and a leader who really defends the interests of his country. it is worthy of respect. and i think the fact that he agreed to sweden joining nato is the result of a very long, very active bargaining. turkey has clearly negotiated

for itself certain e, benefits, certain privileges, as they understand, that this is so far hidden cancer, we do not know that this is the only one, as it seems to me, this is clearly not joining the eu. i cannot imagine a single serious argument. why should turkey join the european union? they have a free trade zone, as far as possible, they have already received from the eu everything they could get. eh, their development drivers are in the east or in the north, but there is no way the entrance will become part of the block, which is now sinking and disintegrating, it would be strange, but at this stage, as a tactical means. now the planning horizon for very many politicians declined. now they don't think strategically. uh, distance, well

, in segments, they think. two years ahead, this is still a very positive factor for at least half of the turkish population , we know the results of the presidential elections, yes , which allow erdogan to stabilize society inside turkey, so i think this is a tactical move, uh, which will not lead to any then long-term changes, but will help improve internal problems. yes, you know, when we consider the topic ourselves, probably impossible to ignore. it's still vilnius, it's only 150 km from us. yes , two events took place there, which, probably, should have been touched upon at least a little, firstly, in parallel, i ask, some, what is it called? the name is such an interesting site , so it was called, that is, parallel events that the fugitives named within the framework of the methanate itself, you know

, such a parallel immediately passes when we allow it. the un security council is taking place in new york and an exhibition of thoroughbred hamsters, in this case not purebred, and this one is called the event site. yes, that's about such an event, but the fugitives asked very much that all the very ones who fled. uh, vilnius, they hung flags in the windows, including on dog kennels, this is a quote. i don't make it up. and what will somehow remind you of yourself and attract attention, but at the same time , the opposition media, or rather, our fugitive media that left, but once considered themselves belarusian, did not invite anyone to this one themselves. this is even as reporters for coverage. and the foreign press wrote that they would come to eat cookies, something like this , you know, when you describe it all in in general, yes, it gives the impression. what they want to remind about themselves, they at least have some chance, at least the slightest chance of

resuscitating themselves. well, i 'll admit it, maybe, uh, even somehow wrong, but i did not notice this event. i still try to pay attention to those, uh events factors that , well, really matters can somehow influence i understood that it must be something. the second point is as follows. er, i mean, yes, they are. there they are trying to do something. yes, but from my point of view view of this uh, a group of people, no matter how sad it may sound. they have exhausted themselves. that is , it is, in fact, already politically, well, corpses, if you like, this one, i don't know which one is softer. i don’t know how to play along with the comparison, there is such a metaphor, if someone was in the village and saw how, uh, they cut chicken there. yes, the head is already on the ground. and the body is still moving around the yard. here it is approximately there is a metaphor that yes, i saw running around. i personally saw this.

this is sort of a metaphor. it may be a little harsh, but it conveys the real state. these fugitives are the opposition. nobody needs them anymore, like a suitcase without a handle, but as long as there is funding, something needs to be done. well, they do these things. i don't think it makes sense to waste time discussing. i think we will not develop this topic. it's just a pity for the chicken, it happens, maybe a person is loved. yes, i support zakharova’s statement that, in fact, nato itself failed even before it began, and this connects. she is with the decision to transfer the us to ukraine cassette. ammunition i got the impression that this is the solution they didn’t understand, even in europe, even allies very close to the united states, not great britain spain italy well canada yes, she also said enough. here's how you comment on this

decision and whether the us initiative will become a real stumbling block for the entire western coalition. well, i'll start from the end, there will be a place, because there is no democracy there. there is no collective decision making. that is pahan said. yes, everything will be done. this is the first. and this is the main thing, what they accepted was not accepted. it is rather more polite using this weapon is inhumane. yes this is yesterday. that is, as a rule, this is a blow to reputation, but another question. why are americans doing this? and why do experts also know that this weapon on the troops who are sitting in dugouts in the trenches works very badly. this weapon is dangerous primarily for the civilian population, and for decades afterwards, because it litters this territory, according to statistics, about 30% on average, the main conclusion that i can draw from this does not explode. first , the americans no longer see the point of supplying

better quality weapons there and want reorient save. this is a weapon for taiwan and the number two conclusion is that they do not see the prospects for victory in ukraine, which means that they need to leave scorched earth. uh, to create as many problems for russia as possible to restore these territories once they return to normal life. so i think that cluster munitions are evidence precisely. this second feeling, the americans have always acted this way. when you saw something else we live in our own world in europe we don't we know the history of latin america of the 20th century , what the americans did, it’s terrible there. but nevertheless, no one particularly pedals these topics, but their use in laos in yemen in syria is these ammunition. it's already

revealing. so far in vietnam. it's wonderful. we see these consequences. well, 60 years of consequences and the answer is clear. alexandrovich , i remember the quote from the first deputy head of the presidential administration of russia, kirenko. yes , russia will win in the hot phase of the confrontation in ukraine, but the economic war will go on longer, and the most difficult battles. yes, it will be a war of meaning, an ideological war, and, moreover, the purpose of this war. our youth. here's what we can counter. this is with a message. i agree. well, this is a classic, this is a classic situation related to the fact that we constantly say we are moving along the path of forming a multipolar world. moreover, when we say this, we focus only on the positive, but on the fact that the world will become more

just and equitable, but we often miss it. and what precedes the creation of this multipolar world, and precedes how since this is the local conflicts that will be in the next decade. uh, appearing everywhere literally all over the world, and the second is a really tough economic confrontation to win the economic confrontation. we will have to create our own technological zone. we 'll have to recreate. all those sectors of the economy that are of key importance for the normal life of the activities of our society and our state, in fact , restore what was lost in belarus. yes, it is possible. so much within a macro-region is an association of sovereign countries that voluntarily unite in the interests of creating a single market for a single logistics system. technological system. yes, we will have to create not even recreate, but create a full-fledged

technological zone of a full-fledged economic complex. this is the first and it is clear that it will develop under conditions of severe restrictive sanctions in the context of an economic war. this is what kiriyenko is talking about, but no economy can be sustainable. there is no clear understanding yet. and where to we are going. and what kind of society? we want to build. on what social principles is the most difficult thing for the sake of which we bear all these hardships. this is a matter of worldview. this is a matter of ideology. this is a question of the image of the future, if we do not formulate these questions that are understandable to everyone and understandable to both an academician and a simple student. we won't be able to move on. i want to tell you that this is not even a struggle for young people to see their own vision of the world - this is the key issue of creating a macro-region. if there is no future, how can countries be united into

a single whole, that is, the question is still ideological conceptual. thought economy and defense three elements that today determine the future state of the problem is actually a problem. so let's, maybe a more pleasant question. now let's try the one that, thank god, is already coming, at least for belarus, the male, who was just the day before iran was a kid for decades and was accepted into this organization as a full member the day before. and why do experts call iran's membership in the sco fundamentally important, both for the country itself, so for the organization and who to prepare for the entrance. a good question is the sco - this is really a real attempt to stabilize the situation at the regional level at the level of greater eurasia

, well, china india russia, the entry of iran, in fact, ensures control over the south, moreover, the entry of iran, uh -e creates , er, the prospects for the construction of transport corridors of logistical links that are not controlled by the strange west in any way. and this is an exit both to the indian market and to africa. that is, these are serious. eh, let's just say structural changes in the territory of eurasia is a regional organization that is formed with global goals. they are in it 3.5 billion people per second of the population in a normal development condition. this is a difficult historical period for the countries of the region and the second point. let's still talk about iran uh, iran uh, made a revolution. there was a very large scatter wobble. uh, the war began, where with iraq, where

with iraq, practically supported. uh, all the countries of the west, uh, 500,000 dead. uh, iran has become a passionate state with very cohesive, uh, political economic structures. they have been under very strict sanctions for 40 years. they managed to rebuild almost all sectors of their economy, including the military-industrial complex. they were able to carry this vision of their society, which is largely shared by young people, even attempts to organize a colored re. syvorone did not end in anything, both in essence and ideologically, but they have a very strong religious, let's say, religious power , you don't even understand. what a thing, it seems. we very often look at iran through e, western propaganda filters. we do not quite understand this civilization. we must understand it.

why because i have not seen, uh , there is even a softer religious relationship, certain canons, but softer relations between people in discussing these, by the way, i am the co-chairman of the friendship group with the parliament of iran and this country surprises me. this is a country that has a vision of the future and its entry into the sco adds color and balances the whole structure. we are no doubt already there. we have already adopted the necessary laws and mortified the main agreements. and i think that we will go through this path very quickly and we will become part of the sco. why because it is a matter of principle? well, i don’t want to say a lot about this here, but it’s enough to read the speech of the president of belarus at the summit that followed the last one, where there is a very clear programmatic picture of the fact that belarus will, uh, provide the jaw in this

organization. and it's very serious. i really want us to go this whole way without any hesitation, let's say, in my opinion. this is very important for the country number for the country. i think that this path should be passed without hesitation. i would add to this that we need to intensify activity. e, on the track of the formation of our own macro-region, which takes place through the union state of the union of belarus of russia, we need to draw all the countries of the cis into the orbit of this interaction, perhaps even to some extent turkey of the country. uh, let's call nearby. this is so far. yeah, don't want to just make too big say, uh, erdogan is so wise that uh his entry is that are not excluded. well, let's look. the main thing that protects the pro turkish position and the interesting

turkish yes national state. this means that sooner or later. there will be very interesting decisions leaders. european countries remained not in separate countries. i'll ask then. as a deputy, not as a diplomat. and what is, from a practical point of view, behind the standard diplomatic turnovers? great prospects for cooperation and great potential for belarus, crime in the sco, well, i paid attention to president's speech. i really believe that this is the policy document we actually provide. ah, markets. if you take, well, in general it would be more correct to start with security. this is an attempt to stabilize the situation in the region of greater eurasia, where our allies are, and there we can jointly, uh, create these institutions that will stabilize society, and all of all

kinds. threats. the second element is a huge market. uh, all of our products, everything that we produce can be sold there, uh, and uh, there will be no political barriers. this half of humanity. yes, and it's not even the least important thing here is not the quantity. uh, the important thing here is that no one will create barriers for our products for political reasons. there will be no sanctions, this is a very big deal. why because, mmm, the world is collapsing , there is no longer the former globalization, that is, we are going through the trends of regionalization. we have always been proud that we have the most open economy in belarus, that 60% of what we produce we sell to the outside world, but let's ask ourselves a question. and if we we sell it, and the world begins to divide and economic wars begin, that this is already unworthy. this is already a vulnerability. ah,

the leadership of the country. this is understood and the reorientation of trade flows takes place. uh, to regions where we can safely sell our products for decades to come. this is logistical connectivity, this is access to raw materials. these are all the elements that are necessary to enter, uh, quickly and correctly in creating my own economic macro-region to ensure stability for the future. well, i'm fine then i'll ask, right at the right time. the league of nations. yes, there was such an organization. it collapsed precisely because it was unable to resolve issues of security in the world and the coexistence of the peaceful coexistence of countries on the planet. that's a few years ago. i got the impression that he literally jumped on this shaky path of collapse. is the sco capable of replacing the toothless and degrading

present moment in the future and becoming a new global one. well, let's say a consolidating center. well , for example, apartments in the same shanghai yes, well, i i would like to suggest changing the frame a bit. here are our conversations. see. you are talking about the collapse of ligation. and let's ask all the questions when it appeared. the league of nations emerged after the first world war. he, when the forty-fifth year appeared, that is, an interesting pattern emerges, large global international institutions emerge after a period of severe upheavals, as a tool for stabilizing and creating an institution that will work for the development of the future for russia's security. it turns out that the sco, as a regional organization today, or some other organization, or it can be updated, because it's a pity to lose an organization that has such a wonderful charter. it can

again be reborn, arise , transform only after a period of serious upheavals. and we are right now. uh, at the beginning of this period. we are just entering this period of transformation , there was a hope that it would still be on the sly. no. with all my desire, too, for this to be behind. unfortunately, we are entering this decade before the thirtieth year. this a period of very serious military economic and ideological upheavals. you're there gloomy forecast andrey vladimirovich why is thirty a real forecast? i, unfortunately, can not focus only on the positive. well then , a lot will indeed depend directly on our ability to ensure security in this regional segment. i want to say more, everything will depend precisely on this , it is regionalization that is becoming the main trend,

global institutions do not work international law. basically, no longer works. strong countries. first of all, it is easy for westerners to easily violate all their obligations, even with the supply of cluster munitions. they are already this, the most eloquent example of the last of the last agree. i'm not talking about the threat to nuclear power plants and so on and so forth and the explosion of northern streams, yes, about which everyone has forgotten for some reason. although it was already like this. and it seems to me that not just the red line, it was burgundy in every sense. well, okay, wars, yes, andrey vladimirovich well, unfortunately, we have to ask last thing. extremely not for today about a philosophical question, the vilnius nato summit, it could bring two surprises. yes , at least, but it didn’t bring a single one. sweden, as expected, will become a member of nato, and ukraine

, as many places expected, will become. here, although historically these decisions could be made 30 km from the belarusian border. here we are used to in belarus we are really used to the fact that, unlike european politicians , minsk does not give empty promises. do they solve the issue? here we know how to wait, and we know how to work for the future, even if it the year 2030, yes, as you indicated, but how soon our peace initiatives will be heard, but you and i have almost answered this question. but i would like to emphasize one thing, really. we do not give empty promises, and we think ahead. you pay attention. i don’t know what this deep peacefulness of the belarusian nation of the belarusian leadership manifests itself in. we are already now thinking about how

we will create together all together with institutions that will contribute to the development of this security and security. for everyone, and without exception. this is an initiative that we call either helsinki two or, uh, the spirit of san francisco, yes , about creating an international conference and discussing the principles of operation. new world is, perhaps, as we have already said after the period of catastrophes after the thirtieth year, but we have already formulated this today and we are promoting this with our partners, discussing some modalities. this suggests that the belarusian nation, the belarusian society, is still charged for the world and charged for the long term and are building a world that there will be room for everyone. this is what is fundamentally important. i just want to know one thing, in my opinion, both san francisco and helsinki, uh, just how geographical names

have discredited themselves. let it be shanghai one supports. i agree with it. thank you. thank you very much. talk. i liked belorusskaya i walk around even dagetshasu vabets novu koucil and most of the people knew the volume of the temple to the call. yes, the caravans of e are not only a fragment of columns with square windows, but also niches of such niches, they put uh sculptures. what to stir up? wow, not impudent sightings of significant cultural objects on the map of ukraine cultures on the svetsky project

architecture of belarus belarusian architecture is sacred architecture and it was ideally recreated in this style was more of a european stage. we have gathered you have gained emotions in order to give out your own and look original on our tv channel. young intellectuals gathered on this show to test their knowledge, who can tell us? uh, who are the sumerians hexos? and the assyrians in general terms, at least sergey tell us what you know and the sumerians, jesuses and assyrians - these are quite ancient peoples , now they will give out all their knowledge and show what they are capable of. ilya what do you know about the colosseum and about the romans and used leonidoconcrete that even in ancient times they used

concrete. well, even in antiquity, and then it was rediscovered so 1,000 rubles. so this is what we have how many percent it turns out, this is 100%, so again it will be percent then. mathematics , see an intellectually entertaining project. i know on tv channel belarus 24.

it's hard to believe that people did it. although you can't call them human. we say that they are not people. these are just people who are devoid of any human feelings. to drive a swamp of strokes of women and children into a population that posed no threat to

the german army and see how babies slowly died. my pedagogical experience is 40 years of which 20 years. i worked as a director of a school , a lot of people began to come, not only the soviet space, it is very important to convey this information, which is impossible. forget can't forgive those who preached in life great patriotic war. the german

priest writes that he was walking through the forest and heard strange sounds. and i saw people behind the wire. and so, while he was walking, he saw an old woman with a shot in the head. he saw how the german soldiers were dragging the old man, and he writes like a dead horse. but then he writes that what i saw, it can’t even dream in a dream, such a nightmare, it turned out to be non-rudotherapy. and these were children , babies a little older. today i really can’t imagine my life in another area, how did i move here in school to azarichi, and i was sent to work at an auxiliary boarding school. this is a closed school, like there were children with

intellectual disabilities. i worked there for 12 years. oh, when the school disbanded, it was closed. i was transferred to work here as a history teacher. uh. i was also offered a museum in memory of the victims of the riga death camp, this topic. i was already close. i knew about the azarian death camp when i came to work there, and there was very little information about the former prisoners. those prisoners have not yet published their memoirs, who were 10-15 years old. they remembered very well this hell they were in. i was lucky that i met with the former prisoners, the authors of the bookstore, a group arrived here, brought by the germans, and among this group was a woman, valentina, who gave birth to

a boy. she died immediately, but the child is alive, and the germans ordered all the dead to be taken down in piles, they took him from his mother from his mother. they took off the sweatshirt. they wrapped the child in this sweatshirt and put it under a pine tree. i asked how they just took it and put it under a pine tree. and what was to do? we today we knew each of us that not today. tomorrow we will be in this headquarters of corpses. well, we decided that he would not spend the night at night, and in the morning we would take him buried with his mother, and in the morning when we went to collect him , he did not show any signs of life all night. and when they went to pick him up. they unfolded the jersey, and he began to cry. alive and so he told me that you need to forget. what is the feeling of joy here is a smile to see a person's face. there was a lot of snow in this one. he was born on march 16 and was released

on march 19. this is the only prisoner of witness whom it is written that he was born in the azaricha concentration camp, domanovichsky district of the polissya region. last year. our museum was visited by 3.500 people. this is the school museum. this is a lot. and about 2,000 have already visited this year , and every time you tell, these are the memories. now i understand why i was always worried about the prisoners, when they came to the museum, i was always worried that i would feel bad, because they let it all through themselves. they lived through it, i experience it, and even, it happens that during the tour with me. and the voice is trembling. and involuntarily, it just voluntarily rolls, because, on the other hand, for some reason it still happens and why i perceive it this way, when you see it.