our forces to maintain international peace and security use the international apparatus to promote the economic and social progress of all peoples. this is a quote from the preamble of the un charter. what are the goals of the united nations well, at least on paper, that in practice , in fact, since its inception, he has constantly criticized either slowness or bureaucracy. now i also drew attention to politicization this week, and our president alexander lukashenko instructed to intensify work at the international platform to make the voice of belarus sound even louder, whether it will again become the very impartial organization that it was created in 1945, and that today there was a russian agenda in the draft question number one , permanent representative of our country. he is the fishermen's valentine. hello valentin

borisovich, today he remains the very unique platform where he is guided exclusively by common sense, they speak exclusively on business. he is 193 countries of the world, we should never forget about this. unfortunately, sometimes it sounds criticism. as for the un, you know it is extremely unconstructive without understanding that the decisions that the general assembly makes are the decisions of the member states - this is not the decision of the bureaucratic structure. this is how the state votes in the general assembly, depending on its own national interests and emotional priorities, we should never forget about this. we are working very actively. and that's the purpose of our work at the un. it's working with government members. this is the uniqueness of this platform, universal in that it the only such sites simply do not exist anymore, it's great, right?

each of the three countries, of course, has its own interests within the framework, which, in the context, which they accept their agenda, figuratively speaking, put forward. sometimes positions of interests may not coincide and contradict each other. and that's okay. this is correct, but at the same time , attention has been paid to this lately, head of state. here at the meeting this week with you, that in the organization appear, let's say relatively speaking, pets within the framework, probably, and in whose interests the international agenda is built. i look, and now we discussed this issue with the president of russia to the secretariat. he is a working body. they have already begun to work in terms of some preferences for one or two state languages. that is, it somehow already turns into an organization. hmm, into such an organization. what? if you please, and it depends more on large states, this is not normal, the trend will change. the situation

will not change for the better, or well, in reality, the situation at the meetings is a little another. unfortunately, there are indeed events that are taking place in our region. they dictate much of the agenda. unfortunately, unfortunately, i say, because this conflict, for all its tragedy, is tragic for us, as neighbors, as a country practically involved in helping the people of ukraine in helping the russian federation, the conflict is not the only conflict of this kind in the mass the world. is there a certain fatigue in the member state? yes of course from this situation? are there any grievances what huge resources a lot of time is devoted to the consideration of only one issue of only one conflict. yes of course, about favorites. well, you know, the fact is that

the secretariat is a structure on its own, it cannot determine the favorites or not the favorites of this opinion and the positions of the members of this site. in general, belarus has with whom and what to talk about. of course, the voices of everyone. how these states and other states relate to what we are saying in particular depends, of course, on the position of one or another specific state, but i can assure you that my communication is the practice of communicating with ambassadors. even from well, let's say, so softly and not the most friendly countries, it shows that they are very attentive to what we do and to what we say, how we vote, how we carry out this or that decision. how do we interact with our partners, and this all once again confirms that attention is of course.

you can say absolutely total about how we behave in this international structure. so i think that this attention will definitely not weaken. here you are talking about voting a lot of criticism. it sounds to belarus that we always support the interests of russia in everything at the same time, if you look at the meeting, figuratively speaking, when a bloc of european states votes. of course, they support each other. needless to say, the same policy of double standards has also infiltrated the united nations. see, she didn't just infiltrate, she she was always part of the job. and in the un and in other structures of course, a state that is, for example , a member of the european union is tied , so to speak, within the bloc discipline of course, the state will always vote the way the european

union votes as a whole every time we say, every time we pay attention to this, because voting in support of someone, and this is absolutely. well, of course , a thing, because any country has partners. there are allies, there are strategic partners and allies. you are right, uh, raising the questions about the fact that countries vote differently. this is fine. this is naturally absolutely normal, because each country has its own national interests. priorities and the country votes and acts as it wishes to conduct its foreign policy. sometimes, of course, very funny things happen. when on some issues, for example, voting. well, let's say three votes against, for example, let's say the united states , uh, for example, ukraine and let's say the marshal islands. well, you know, uh, when there are three voices, so

to say in unison against everything else, uh, the composition of the united nations well, at least this raises questions and how global the interests are. here in this particular issue, the conditional marshall islands. this also raises very serious questions. but nevertheless, you see, such things happen, and in general we are used to it and it is easy to criticize the organization and is this criticism justified? unfortunately, we have recently observed a negative trend, when representatives of even the highest the leaderships of the united nations of the secretariat of the introduced nations take sides in this or that issue or that or that conflict, which is not normal, because they should be impartial and should not take

sides in any in any situation. in any conflict, journalists recently said that diplomats fight heroically, in fact, work in the international arena. it's like a diplomatic war, and every meeting is a diplomatic battle. and if we already speak this language, then one of our victories, probably, is that it no longer raises the topic of the incident by rainer's plane at meetings, to your merit. what are our other victories in the diplomatic field? thank you for the service for the recognition, in fact, this is our collective merit, of course , the situation is enough. stressful work, hard work, hard work in our permanent mission, only including an ambassador for nine diplomats, and towards the president, uh, said that if you would give 15 more employees, each of us

them would be loaded in full. and this is really a fact of work very, very much and difficulties. now it consists in the fact that we have to deal not only with the promotion, so to speak, of our own initiatives and the protection of our own national interests and priorities, but also with providing very significant assistance to friendly countries, our main task. it consists in the fact that some issue on belarus does not become an item on the agenda of the security council. this is the most unpleasant thing in the general assembly. of course to unfortunately, in our country e is quite often mentioned in a negative way according to well-known ones. uh, you understand the reasons now for any issue that belarus initiates. it instantly, firstly, attracts interest, both friendly

and, so to speak, unfriendly, and active attempts are being made . - something solution is being attempted. uh, either to make some amendments that do not suit us to such a document, or simply to block it with us this year, it will be at the session at the upcoming at 78 sessions. our draft resolution on combating trafficking in human beings is to be considered. this is our landmark initiative, and it was once announced by the president of belarus alexander lukashenko from the rostrum of the general assembly many years ago in 2005. e since then. this is an initiative by which belarus will learn the history. it began in 1945, belarus joined the organization as one of the founding countries. so it was highlighted. the contribution of our people to the defeat of fascism today the organization consists of 193

belarus traditionally takes an active position, for example, alexander lukashenko at the 2005 summit took the initiative on the need to form a partnership to combat human trafficking, and in 2015, from the un rostrum, our president warned about the danger of color revolutions. there are a number of directions and a number of initiatives by which belarus is recognizable and respected. we are actively working on the topic of the genocide of the belarusian people, the fight against the glorification of nazism in all its manifestations. well, of course, now very, uh, actively is underway. our job is to resist. sanctions pressure attitudes what do they think? this is a legitimate tool in any of my conversations with international officials, including the top management of the secretary general 's secretariat or his deputies in relation to

what i say and because of how the person reacts. of course, i see perfectly well that a person is absolutely aware that these things are illegal; this is supported within the framework of the general assembly at various committees. when considering some questions. this is supported by the state members of the majority of states, and unfortunately, if we talk to even high-ranking international officials, each time they answer our questions about sanctions something like this is a bilateral problem, you solve the issue with your neighbors, with your partners and with other states. well, at the same time, one must clearly understand that the countries they are talking about are our closest neighbors, which create, uh, the most serious

sanctions problems for the republic belarus but how should i put it delicately not entirely independent in decision-making and it is quite clear that it is necessary to conduct a dialogue on this topic with the leadership of the european union with the united states of america a and other key players. you can still often hear accusations against us that, allegedly, there are problems with the violation of human rights about belarus. is this the most ideal country , maybe someone is set as an example? no of course, of course, everyone understands perfectly well that there is not a single state in which you, to one degree or another, do not there were these so-called human rights violations. well, firstly, uh, every state should have the right to an independent path of development. we talk about it every time.

what is necessary, first of all, it is necessary to observe basic human rights and this is fully done in the republic of belarus on the right to live a decent life, the right to education, and the right to medical care, and so on and so on and so on, when these rights are not respected in others states. i repeat once again there are no ideal countries before to criticize someone or punish someone, you need to deal with your own problems, your own country with its own population to ensure an absolutely decent life, the full implementation of these basic things of basic human rights for your own population, and then try to teach someone else. unfortunately, the topic is very popular and uh, and it is very active, uh, it is being promoted, including in the organization. it's all sorts of gender issues gbt failures. and so on and so on. do you understand when it is put in

the cornerstone when it becomes the basic right of a person and, in fact, they talk about it the most, and when you are reproached for not doing certain things that a normal country can and should not do , we will speak absolutely frankly of course, every time we try to level this criticism and fight with this critique based on examples based on facts and so on and so forth. that is why i said that also the huge amount of work in the organization is due to the fact that there is a need for very carefully monitor any documents coming to the consideration of a particular body, because it has such a practice. if some provision is recorded in a particular decision in a particular resolution and, for example, a country. well, let's say the republic of belarus in this case does not object to this wording. this turns into what

is called the language of the un so, that is, when making a subsequent decision. if suddenly we start, uh, trying to counteract this, they tell us, let me but there are documents. right there it is written. you did not object when this document was adopted. you see, taking into account the composition of the limited number of diplomats, but it is quite difficult to keep track. we're trying to do it, we're going to do it, it's quite difficult to keep track of the inclusion. here are these absolutely unacceptable for us theses or wordings in this or that document, how many documents a diplomat reads every day , some pages, a large volume. trust me, it's big. and these are all very serious things, you know. some of them require an immediate response. if you ever watched us perform.

uh, let's say the general assembly or at the security council, especially at the security council, we have chosen this tactic now , we are trying to sign up as late as possible. then criticism addressed to us and you could probably notice, what, for example, during a speech. uh, the text prepared in advance is postponed, because it is necessary to respond to what was said in this room. here in this regard. uh, you know, it is of great importance that there is trust, there is a credit of trust from the leadership of the ministry of state leadership to us, which allows us to literally add some things to the speech on the go , then what? trust me very, very, very. many countries can not afford when

the ambassador is speaking, especially at the meeting of the security council move. to the left, a step to the right, well, it entails serious consequences and everything is absolutely agreed every word every comma of course, there are and such things are such things when it is necessary to make some kind of statement, which, of course, is agreed from beginning to end with the center, but otherwise we have the right to react. i always say that especially as a young diplomat. i always say be a diplomat, but very easy. you just need to know well the national interests of your country, and be able to promote and protect them. we always react very actively and constructively to the statement that belarus is allegedly the aggressor in the ukrainian conflict, but remains whether this is the mood and this question in the international agenda of the aggressor, the question

of course remains on the agenda. it will no doubt remain on the agenda, because there are a number of interested states, er, who will not let this issue die. i'm not talking about the fact that it's simple and the conflict, of course, continues on its own and is not visible yet. uh, the prospects for some kind of peaceful settlement. i understand that this conversation is likely to be very emotional usually. well, this conversation is going in a constructive direction or if the prospects of what will come out soon, i mean a specific solution, how to resolve this situation? how to prevent the third world, of course, emotionally, because well, you can imagine, actually. this can be seen in the speech of, for example, the ukrainian permanent representative of the ukrainian ambassador. e, which is always quite emotional. sometimes they cross the uh of all faces. so to speak, the diplomatic etiquette of the speeches of representatives of western

states, of course, are full of accusations and water from russia to us often, and the speeches of representatives of the central european countries of our neighbors the baltic states in poland are the countries that are now from the eastern european group in the albanian security council they are sometimes. uh, you know , locomotives are running ahead, so to speak, with accusations and so on, searches. you know perfectly well that there are a number of peace initiatives now. uh, my deep conviction is that if there is an agreement between the russian federation on the one hand and the big west, so to speak, on the other hand, then this conflict is possible very quickly. stop, if we talk about security issues in general, and belarus is, let's say , at the epicenter of a geopolitical rift, of course, these issues are acute for us.

of course, we can be one of the first to react to them, belarus stands for the peaceful resolution of any conflicts 8 years ago , the normandy four gathered in the palace of independence, where they discussed the conditions for establishing peace in ukraine from the first days, the aggravation of the situation in 2020, the second, our country again calls to the side to negotiate at the table negotiations, the official minsk considers it necessary to also strengthen international security in 2017 was put forward the idea of ​​launching a new helsinki process initiative, was named helsinki 2 last year by the secretary general. the un received a message from alexander lu. it talks about the need for a dialogue between the key players of the world on global security in the spirit of san francisco, how they reacted, that's what they are talking about and whether they began to somehow objectively discuss such a possibility of such negotiations , you know, well, for now, i'm frankly completely i will say that while there is a substantive conversation on some details on some, say, the logistics of organizing such an event, there are no

conversations, at least public conversations or private conversations . indeed, at every adequate opportunity, we of course remind the state member of the organization of certain nations about this initiative of the president of belarus alexander lukashenko to hold a broad discussion of a broad dialogue meeting in. what do we call we are now gone from this helsinki helsinki 2. we call it in the spirit the san francisco state is aware that belarus has taken this initiative from time to time. it's an idea. not necessarily with reference to our president, but it's mentioned in speeches. er separate, er, states, which is already good, because without the conversation of a broad diplomatic settlement of conflicts. e in the world. it's just impossible, you understand , diplomats are needed not to talk with friends, but to talk even with enemies or

opponents or opponents, whatever you like. you name it and any dialogue, even bad dialogue. it is, of course, much better than war, because people do not die. yes, you can to each other. it is vicious to look at, swear, throw , there are some objects, but still this is a conversation. it is still a search for some way out, some compromise, some solution. what initiatives belarus is promoting, of course, in the first place, is the fight against sanctions pressure. this is the fight against human trafficking. this is the protection of the natural family. protecting middle- income countries. naturally, the implementation of the agenda. uh, according to the goals of sustainable development. does belarus have anything to say here? we can share our experience here. listen, just drive along the streets of minsk or any other belarusian city and you will see the implementation

of this agenda of achieving sustainable development in action . e sustainable development. and this is a priority , the president spoke about this. uh, belarus alexander lukashenko needs to be considered perspective of our existence as a country precisely in terms of sustainable development, because without this development. we simply will not have a country about food security on the international platform. do they say in general and in particular on the issue of fertilizers western state western blogs are trying to reduce this issue, only to the issue of fulfillment or non-execution of the grain deal. we are talking about this issue. in a much broader format, including the supply of our fertilizers. i repeatedly. e in their statements on this subject have repeatedly said

that belarus provides at least 20% of world supplies. e, these e fertilizers in itself are provided with them and are ready to assist those countries that need counteraction in this product in this product. e. with all these sanctions measures regarding blocking the supply of belarusian potassium, this is one of our most-most-most important. uh, the tasks that we face today. i think the upcoming big event in september is a high-level week of the general assembly. un a good opportunity to discuss all these important issues on the international agenda together without fail. naturally. we are from september 19 begins the high level week we expect. the arrival of the belarusian delegation to this event, headed by the minister of foreign affairs of course , all these questions will be touched upon in a speech

at the general assembly. a large number of worthwhile bilateral meetings with the leadership of the secretariat are to come. i assure you. these are all questions. everything we are talking about today spoke. here, all these questions will be reflected in the theses that will be voiced by the head of the belarusian delegation. in addition, of course, in a day. yes, this will begin on their own in the implementation of goal-oriented development, the implementation of e. agenda 20-30. what is the number one question facing the country as a whole on the international platform today, he is the number one question for you personally, as the permanent representative of belarus, he, of course, world peace is the same thing. the main thing is the main goal. where are we? i hope very much like this end reach. uh, this regional conflict, once again i repeat, is not the only one, but nevertheless, this is a conflict that is taking place on our

doorstep and which directly affects us, creates a lot of problems, inconveniences , people are dying, of course, i would like this conflict to end and the work of our mission . eh, in any direction. it is, in principle, built around making some contribution to the end of this conflict and all related issues, and countering sanctions pressure. uh, countering attempts to block supplies. our fertilizers and other products. uh, any financial sanctions are absolutely illegal. and these are probably the main issues that our diplomats are constantly working on, and we will continue to do this, despite any pressure and any attempts, so to speak, to hinder or stop our work. what

is the best way to test your erudition and ingenuity with the right tricky questions? name the fabulous genie who was saved by the soviet boy volka 's crutches because of turning, old man hottabych, and the full name is further well received. it's absolutely correct answer. hope can still answer this question. and if i answer incorrectly, if you see it incorrectly, i will answer. this is your right. is it true that all faces of any parallelepiped are squares,

because as i remember, a rectangle is also a square. they, on the contrary, are the brightest star in the night sky in the northern hemisphere. knowing well-trained people and what they can tell you will unambiguously surprise you , many people are surprised how a rhinoceros jaw was found in a woodland in belarus, it turns out several thousand years ago in the territory of our woodlands, animals that can now be found in africa , skin with the hero of flooding, will share it with him that knowing the town itself is overgrown, the spice half-day

of the belarusian city. it’s half a day here the belarusian clause, young people are on the face of horyn politics a project about people who live for half a day in belarus and rob usyo for the development of their motherland what is it? a good-natured person i even knew such people who did not understand, did not even realize that something bad had to be done. you see how important nature is to him. here is the maximum persisted, 204. calise is in nature surrenders to the light.