[000:00:00;00] of this national championship, as well as the fourth preliminary stage of the national palov league, will be held on august 19-20 , in the near future we will cheer for our men's and women 's teams among players under 20 years old at the second

games of the cis countries , removed from the city of mitusni. here is your edge and your strength. true pirate cop. forgive yourself. tumble down and tear off a special one. she

got wet, tell me the elements. skin croc and one not with nature own tolerance to live together in peace with each other. as kind, neighbors join our forces to maintain international peace and security to use the international apparatus to promote the economic and social progress of all peoples. this is a quote from the preamble of the un charter. what are the goals of the united nations well, at least on paper, that in practice

, in fact, since its inception, he has constantly criticized either slowness or bureaucracy. now i also drew attention to the politicization this week, and our president alexander lukashenko instructed to intensify work on the international platform so that the voice of belarus sounds more louder, will he again become the same impartial organization that it was created in forty-five, and that today was the russian agenda of the draft question number one permanent representative of our country. he is the fishermen's valentine. hello valentin borisovich, today he remains the very unique platform where he is guided solely by common sense and speaks exclusively on business. he is 193 countries of the world, we should never forget about this. unfortunately, sometimes there is criticism.

to the un you know such an extreme unconstructive without understanding that the decisions taken by the general assembly are the decisions of the member states - this is not the decision of the bureaucratic structure. this is how the state votes in the general assembly, depending on its own national interests and national priorities, we should never forget about this. we are working very actively. and that's the purpose of our work at the un. it's working with government members. this is the uniqueness of this universal platform in that it is the only such platform more simply no, that's great, right? it's just that each of the three countries, of course, has its own interests within the framework, which , relatively speaking, they put forward in the context of which they accept their agenda. sometimes positions of interests may not coincide and contradict each other. and that's okay. this is correct, but at the same time , attention has been paid to this lately, head of state. at this week's meeting with

you, let's say , relatively speaking, pets appear in the organization within the framework, probably, and in the interests of which the international agenda. i look, and here we are discussing this issue with the russian president's secretariat. he is a working body. they have already begun to work in terms of some preference for one or two states, or west versus east. that is, it somehow already turns into an organization. hmm, into such an organization. what? if you please , it depends more on large states, this is not normal. the situation will not change for the better, or, after all, in reality , the situation at the meetings is a little different. unfortunately, now the events are really that are taking place in our region. they dictate much of the agenda. unfortunately, unfortunately, i say, because this

conflict, for all its tragedy, is tragic for us, as neighbors, as a country practically involved in helping the people of ukraine in helping the russian federation, the conflict is not the only conflict of this kind in the mass the world. is there a certain fatigue in the member state? yes of course from this situation? is there any resentment that huge resources are big time is given to consideration of only one issue of only one conflict. yes of course, about favorites. well, you know, the fact is that the secretariat is a structure on its own, it cannot determine favorites or non-favorites , this is the opinion and position of states. and in general, in belarus there is someone and what to talk about , of course, the voices of everyone. how these

states and other states relate to what we are saying in particular depends, of course, on the position of this or that particular state, but i can assure assure that my communication is the practice of communicating with ambassadors. even from, let's say, so mildly not the most friendly countries shows that they are very attentive to what we do and to what we say, how we vote, how we carry out this or that decision. how we interact with our partners. eh, this all once again confirms that of course, attention. absolutely total can be said about how we behave. here in this international structure and i think that this is attention will definitely not weaken. here you are talking about voting a lot of criticism. it sounds to belarus that we always

support the interests of russia in everything at the same time, if you look at the meeting, figuratively speaking, when a bloc of european states votes. of course, they support each other. needless to say, that same policy of double standards has infiltrated the united nations, it has not just been infiltrated, it has always been part of the work in the un and in other structures. which is, for example, a member of the european union, tied, so to speak, e within the bloc discipline. of course, the state will always vote the way the whole world votes. the european union side is accused of being absolutely correct . of course, we talk about this every time. we pay attention to this every time, because voting in support of someone, and this is an absolutely natural thing, because

any country has partners. there are allies, there are strategic partners and allies. you correctly uh posed the question of what uh that countries vote differently. it's okay. this is naturally absolutely normal, because each country has its own national interests, its own priorities, and the country votes and acts the way it wants to pursue its foreign policy. sometimes, of course, very funny things happen. when on some issues, for example, voting. well, let's say three votes against, for example, let's say the usa, for example, ukraine and let's say the marshals. you know, uh, when three voices, so to speak, in unison against the rest of the uh, the composition of the organization united nations well, at least this raises questions and how global interests are in this particular issue in the conditional

marshall islands. this also raises very serious questions, but nevertheless, you see, such things happen and, in general, we are used to this and we can calmly criticize the organization and whether this criticism is justified. unfortunately, we have indeed recently observed a negative trend, when representatives of even the top management of the organization of the secretariat of the organization take one side or another in this or that issue or tom or that conflict, which is not normal, because they should be impartial and should not take sides in any in any situation in any conflict. in a conversation with journalists and the other day, you said that diplomats fight heroically, in fact, work in the international arena is akin to a diplomatic war, and every meeting is a diplomatic battle. and if

we already speak this language, then one of our victories, probably, is that the topic of the incident with reiner's plane is your merit. what are our other victories on the diplomatic battlefield. thanks for the recognition. in fact. this is our collective merit, of course , the situation is enough. stressful work , hard work, we have uh in the permanent mission, only including an ambassador for nine diplomats, and meet uh at the president. e, said that if you would give 15 more employees, each of them would be loaded to the full program for us. and this is really a fact of work very, very much and difficulties. now is that we have to deal not only with promoting, so

to speak, our own initiatives and protecting our own national interests and priorities, but also providing very significant assistance to friendly countries is our main task. it consists in the fact that some issue on belarus does not become an item on the agenda of the security council. this is the most unpleasant thing in the general assembly. of course, unfortunately, in our country, e is quite often mentioned in a negative way according to well-known ones. uh, you understand now any reasons the question that belarus initiates it instantly, first of all, attracts interest , both friendly and, so to speak, unfriendly , and active attempts are made . uh, either to make some amendments that do not suit us to such a document,

or simply to block it with us this year, this is to be done at the session at the upcoming 78th session. our draft anti-trafficking resolution is pending people. this is our landmark initiative, and it was once announced by the president of belarus, alexander lukashenko, from the rostrum. general assembly many years ago 2.000 in 2005. e since then. this is an initiative by which belarus will learn the history, it began in 1945, belarus joined the organization and as one of the founding countries. so it was highlighted. the contribution of our people to the defeat of fascism today, 193 states are members of the organization belarus traditionally takes an active position, for example, alexander lukashenka at the 2005 summit took the initiative on the need to form a partnership to combat human trafficking, and in 2015, from the un rostrum, our president warned about the danger of color revolutions. there are a

number of areas and a number of initiatives by which belarus is recognizable respectfully. we are actively working on the topic of the genocide of the belarusian people, the fight against the glorification of nazism in all its manifestations. well, of course, now it is very, uh, actively conducted. our job is to resist. sanctions pressure relationship what do they think? this is a legitimate tool in any of my conversations with international officials, including the top management of the secretary general 's secretariat or his deputies in relation to what i say and because of how the person reacts. of course, i see perfectly well that a person is absolutely aware that these things are illegal; this is supported within the framework of the general assembly at various committees. when considering some

issues. this is supported by state members by most states and unfortunately, if we talk to even high -ranking international officials, each time they answer our questions about sanctions something like this is a bilateral problem, you solve the issue with your neighbors, with your partners and with other states. well, at the same time, one must clearly understand that the countries they are talking about are our closest neighbors, which create, uh, the most serious sanctions problems for the republic of belarus, but how should i put it delicately not entirely independent in decision-making and it is absolutely clear that it is necessary to conduct a dialogue on this topic with the leadership of the european union with the united states of america a and other

key players. you can still often hear accusations against us that, allegedly, belarus has problems with human rights violations. is this the most ideal country, maybe someone is cited as an example? no of course, of course, everyone is well aware that there is not a single state in which these so -called human rights violations have not occurred to one degree or another. well, first of all, uh, every state should should have the right to an independent path of development. we talk about it every time. what is necessary, first of all, it is necessary to observe basic human rights and this is fully done in the republic of belarus the right to live a decent life the right to education, and the right to health care, and so on and so on and so on, when these rights are not respected in others states. i repeat once again there are no ideal countries, before criticizing someone or punishing someone, you need

to deal with your own problems, to ensure an absolutely worthy life by one's own country by one's own population, the full fulfillment of these basic things of basic human rights for one's own population, and then try to teach someone else. unfortunately, a very popular theme and uh, and it is very active, uh, is being promoted, including in his organizations. nations is all sorts of gender issues gbt failure. and so on and so on. you understand when it is put at the forefront, when it becomes the basic right of a person and, in fact, speaking about it they say the most and when you are reproached for not doing certain things that a normal country can and should not do , we will speak absolutely frankly of course, every time we try to level this criticism, fight this

criticism based on examples based on facts , and so on and so forth further. that is why i said that a huge amount of work in the organization is also due to the fact that there is a need to very carefully monitor any documents submitted for consideration by this or that body, because there is such a practice. if some provision is recorded in a particular decision in a particular resolution and, for example, a country. well, let's say the republic of belarus in this case does not object to this wording. this turns into what is called the language of the un so, that is, when making a subsequent decision. if suddenly we start, uh, trying to counteract this, they tell us, let me but there are documents. right there it is written. you didn't mind when this document was adopted.

you understand, taking into account the composition of the limited composition of the numerical e diplomats, but it is quite difficult to keep track. we're trying to do it, we're going to do it, it's hard enough to keep track of the inclusions. here are these absolutely unacceptable for us theses or wordings in this or that document, how many documents a diplomat reads daily. how many pages is this? large volume? trust me, it's big. and these are all very serious things, you know. some of them require an immediate response. if you've ever watched us perform. eh, let's say. general assembly or at the security council, especially at the security council, we have now chosen such a tactic, we are trying to sign up as late as possible. hmm, the last penultimate ones. e in the list of speakers in order to hear everyone and, if necessary, respond to some impartial words to some

criticism of us, and you might have noticed, for example, during a speech. uh, the text prepared in advance is being postponed, because it is necessary to react to what was said in this hall. here in this plan. uh, you know, it is of great importance that there is trust, there is a credit of trust from the leadership of the ministry of state leadership to us, which allows us to literally add some things to the speech on the go , then what? trust me very, very, very. many countries can not afford when the ambassador is speaking, especially at the meeting of the security council move. to the left, a step to the right, well, it entails serious consequences and everything is absolutely agreed upon, every word, every comma , of course, there are, and such things are such things when it is necessary to make some kind of

statement, which, of course, is agreed from beginning to end with the center, but otherwise we are free to react. i always say that especially to young diplomats. i always say be a diplomat, but very easy. you just need to know well the national interests of your country, and be able to promote and protect them. we always respond very actively and constructively to the statement that belarus is allegedly the aggressor in the ukrainian conflict, but does this mood and this question remain? the international agenda of the aggressor question of course remains one agenda. it will no doubt remain on the agenda, because there are a number of interested states, er, who will not let this issue die. i'm not talking about the fact that it's simple and the conflict, of course, continues on its own and is not visible yet. uh,

the prospects for some kind of peaceful settlement. i understand that this conversation is likely to be very emotional usually. well, this conversation goes in a constructive direction , or if the prospects that in the near future time will come out, i mean concrete decisions. how to resolve this situation? how to prevent the third world, of course, emotionally, because well, you can imagine, actually. this can be seen in the speech of, for example, the ukrainian permanent representative of the ukrainian ambassador. e, which is always quite emotional. sometimes they cross the uh of all faces. so to speak, the diplomatic etiquette of the speeches of representatives of western states speeches by representatives of, uh, the central european countries of our neighbors the baltic states in poland, uh, countries that are now from the eastern european group in

the albanian security council, they sometimes uh, you know , run ahead of the locomotives, so to speak with accusations and so on searches. you know perfectly well that there are a number of peace initiatives now. uh, my deep conviction is that if there is an agreement between the russian federation on the one hand and the big west, so to speak, on the other hand, then this conflict is possible very quickly. stop, if we talk about security issues in general, and belarus is, let's say , at the epicenter of a geopolitical rift, of course, these issues are acute for us. of course, we can be one of the first to react to them, belarus stands for the peaceful resolution of any conflicts 8 years ago , the normandy four gathered in the palace of independence, where they discussed the conditions for establishing peace in ukraine from the first days of the escalation of the situation in 2022. our country again calls to the side to negotiate at the table negotiations, the official minsk considers

it necessary to also strengthen international security in 2017 was put forward the idea of ​​launching a new helsinki process initiative, was named helsinki 2 last year by the secretary general. the un received a message from alexander lu. it talks about the need for a dialogue between the world's key players on global security in the spirit of san francisco, how they reacted, what they are talking about, and whether they began to somehow objectively discuss such a possibility of such negotiations , you know. well, for now, i frankly completely i will say that while there is a substantive conversation on some details on some, say, the logistics of organizing such an event, there are no conversations, at least no public conversations or private conversations . indeed, at every appropriate opportunity, we of course remind the state with a member of the organization of certain nations about this initiative of the president of belarus alexander lukashenko to hold

a broad discussion of a broad dialogue meeting in. what do we call we are now gone from this helsinki helsinki 2. we call it in the spirit the san francisco state is aware that belarus has taken this initiative from time to time. it's an idea. not necessarily with reference to our president, but it's mentioned in speeches. e individual states, which is already good, because without the conversation of a broad diplomatic settlement of conflicts. e in the world. it's just impossible, you understand, diplomats are needed not to talk with friends, but to talk even with enemies or opponents or opponents, whatever you like. you name it and any dialogue, even bad dialogue. it is, of course, much better than war, because people do not die. yes, you can to each other. it is vicious to look at, swear, throw , there are some objects, but still this is

a conversation. it is still a search for some way out, some compromise, some solution. of course, borisovich what initiatives are promoted by belarus, of course, in the first place. this is a fight against sanctions pressure. uh, this is anti-trafficking - this is protecting the natural family. protection of countries with an average income level. naturally, the implementation of the agenda. e, according to the goals of sustainable development. does belarus have anything to say here? this is the experience we can share here. listen. here, just drive through the streets of minsk or any other belarusian city and you will see the implementation of this sustainable development agenda in action . e sustainable development. and this is a priority , the president spoke about this. uh, belarus

alexander lukashenko needs to consider the prospect of our existence as a country precisely from the point of view. who is his development? because without this development, we simply will not have a country about food security on the international platform. do they talk in general and in particular on the issue of fertilizers, the western state the western bloc is trying to reduce this issue only to the issue of fulfilling or not fulfilling the grain deal. we say we are considering this issue in a much broader format, including on supplies our fertilizers. i repeatedly. e, in her statements on this topic, has repeatedly said that belarus provides at least 20% of world supplies. e of these fertilizers is itself provided with them and is ready to provide assistance to those countries that need counteraction in this product in this product. e. these are all samsun

measures in relation to blocking supplies from belarusian potassium is one of our most-most. the most important, uh, tasks that we face today. i think the upcoming big event is in september the high-level week of the un general assembly is a good opportunity to discuss all these important issues on the international agenda together without fail. naturally. we e from september 19, the high- level week begins. we are awaiting, uh, the arrival of the belarusian delegation to this event, headed by the minister of foreign affairs. of course, all these questions will be touched upon in a speech at the general assembly. a large number of worthwhile bilateral meetings with the leadership of the secretariat are to come. i assure you. these all questions. everything we talked about today. here, all these questions will be reflected in the theses that will be

voiced by the head of the belarusian delegation. in addition, of course, the implementation will begin a day before. sustainable development in the implementation of the 20-30 agenda, what is the number one issue facing the country as a whole today at the un international platform and for you personally , as the permanent representative of belarus, his, of course, world peace is the most. the main thing is the main goal all of us, i hope very much, would like to achieve this goal, and this regional conflict , i repeat once again, is not the only one, but nevertheless, this is a conflict that is happening on our doorstep and which directly affects us creates a lot of problems, inconvenience, people are dying, of course, i would like this conflict to end and the work of our mission. eh, in any direction. it is, in principle, built

around making some contribution to the end of this conflict and all related issues. e. sanctioned status pressure, uh, resisting attempts to block the supply of our fertilizers and other goods. uh, any financial sanctions are absolutely illegal. and these are probably the main issues that our diplomats are constantly working on, and we will continue to do this, despite any pressure and any attempts. so to say our work to complicate or stop. 24 broadcasts for you around

the clock, do not switch. more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to the projects of our tv channel, belarus business and developing hospitable bright

and festival generous picturesque and monumental sports and team events we introduce you to active, energetic and inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development, belarus can be different to understand and feel. she needs to be seen with her own eyes. tv viewers on the tv channel belarus 24 watch us every day witches

do, belarus is closer. what was the question people thought of the most ancient times, it was raised in the egyptian indian and chinese treatises that we managed to find and decipher today. it’s just that experiments in this area sometimes ended tragically precisely under such circumstances, he died, for example, the chinese emperor in the modern world fortunately does not reach such extremes. although the search for him continues, to this day we will join them in the next half hour to understand how close science is today to the discovery of the elixir of youth about it, after all, it is possible that it is already very close in ekaterina's studio hello and do not

miss it in the program. alchemy and even magic where ancient thinkers tried to find the elixir of youth, according to what laws does the human body age? and how these processes can be suspended, we will find out very soon. to reveal the secret of youth and health, the chinese emperor uzi in the second century bc turned to magicians, and the first to alchemists. in the third century, already our eras devoted their works to the search for a cure for immortality, let's trace all the historical stages,