[000:00:00;00] germany france spain portugal cyprus austria switzerland italy greece romania serbia croatia poland lithuania latvia estonia set the satellite dish to the satellite express am8 the signal of the channel is broadcast in the clear and is available 24 hours a day every day be with belarus 24 tv channel and discover belarus hello greetings all who are with us now. if you want peace, prepare for war as relevant as ever.

so let's start with this topic, we fix provocations the ministry of defense of belarus reported that that over the past 2 weeks belarusian servicemen have detained several people. a drone operator was also detained, who was trying to launch an aircraft on the territory of one of the military units. in addition , several attempts to fly over a protected area were prevented by means of electronic warfare, in principle, our guests andrey petrovich, which means that we will not have to relax and won't leave us alone. well, we are not relaxing , it should be noted that, firstly, well, such cases. they happen regularly, uh there are violations of truly military facilities in protected areas. the second, of course, it should be noted that hmm, when crossing objects that are guarded by the armed forces. it must be remembered that this is always an act, well, violations of this may then follow as an administrative or criminal liability. well, and most importantly

, i would like to say that in any case , today i entered there when you get to the territory of a military facility there, or completely different laws that are defined not just by some general rules established or legislation, but in addition, there are charters for garrison guard services. mouths of the internal service, which give the right to the military to use weapons in case of disobedience or in the event of a clear attack on an object. this is what everyone should remember, you still think everyone has heard of this case of the a50 aircraft. when was the flight and terrorist act against this aircraft committed? we all see how the situation is developing in the south on our borders on the western borders of our country, the level of terrorist danger is really high and it was the military leadership that decided that all the guards should serve in full equipment with ammunition and related

systems that allow, firstly, to organize surveillance and reconnaissance. second, monitor the situation. third. these units are like guards and outfits. they are reinforced by duty units and rapid response units. well , we also have new tools. this electronic warfare electronic suppression correctly say these objects and that's it. this is also coordinated together not just by the military separate militia. a separate kgb everything. it works in a single system, so we have the ability to quickly open, detect and, uh, act accordingly. why were these five cases just presented, because they are already out of a row. out there appeared people who don't just engage in that pampering that's often the case. i spoke at the beginning of the cases. this is pampering. just the boys want to climb onto the object , something else well, there are different cases. and here the names of photos and video filming of military facilities are already involved in these cases. uh,

state security agencies, police agencies, and i think that an important point will be announced in the near future. a large-scale conference on international security is speaking in moscow. there, our minister of defense vector hrening, extremely clearly outlined several fundamental positions of the republic of belarus. i will briefly dwell on two. although i do recommend listening to it carefully. in this dive will soon be adopted a new version of the concept of national security announced by the minister. that is, essentially. this means that we are moving with the times. that is, we react clearly to what is happening and once again sent the necessary signals to those who do not get it from the first second third time. we will do everything, the minister said, so that no one tries to tell the belarusians. how to live on our own land and added our army is ready to repulse anyone, then try to encroach on independence , sovereignty, territorial integrity and the constitutional system of the belarusian state and its allies is that we live

in a peaceful country. it's not an accident, it's not luck. this is the painstaking work of the secret services of the president's state. otherwise, we would not live in a mine country. everything would have been destroyed. if the war were already blazing, attempts to destabilize the situation in the country did not stop and the dreams of the west that belarus would be geopolitically turned away from russia and turned into an anti-russian springboard would not stop, but only for this we need them, these dreams have not gone away. they for many years they did everything for this to happen, this and coups d'etat, this is an attempt inside. country, and now also external action, and the minister of defense was extremely frank. he told the truth, if today belarus had not done everything for security over the years. it's not just tactical nuclear weapons. this is not only a joint russian grouping, it is also our army, which we have been strengthening over all these years, the west would have attacked belarus a long time ago and

we should never have any illusions. the west was not afraid to attack any country when they were sure of their victory the second moment. today is the moment. why did the minister of defense focus on poland? poland is not an independent state today, today this country is extremely dependent on the united states of america and can without the knowledge of the polish people without asking. in fact, the poles do not want to fight, these are our neighbors to them. this is not necessary, they can be thrown into the furnace of war, do not ask, but because everyone sees. why there are more provocations on the border with belarus now. and look what happening in ukraine russia every day methodically continues to solve the assigned tasks in the west, you already grab your head. how to prolong the war? how to make sure that the victory of russia was not? eh, this is good, it is necessary to extend the war further, so there will be more provocations of terrorist attacks on the territory of belarus, there will be more destabilization attempts, there will be more. especially by the twenty-fourth year before the elections

and by the year 25, it is by no means interesting to relax while the west demonizes us with all its might. at least he tries, but we we see by the way delegations come to us, how we are developing relations in those countries that used to be called distant arcs. at the trial, we understand that they are close to us, more than ever e cannot be demonized to the extent that they determined for themselves, nevertheless, against the backdrop of all the aggression that our neighbors, whom oleg sergeevich said, here we are seeing poland ukraine baltic we are broadcasting the president's attitude to build relationships. e a few, but commented on the moments, meeting with the team at the national airport , i propose to listen to one of the fragments now, and then we will definitely discuss it again, i emphasize that we are not going to fight with anyone. i'm telling you, this is all the time, therefore we are peaceful people. we want to cooperate with everyone. yes, now we live at the expense of, first of all, the east of russia , china to cooperate. well, do not forget to express the technological, the west, they are nearby.

they are our neighbors the european union and relations with them should not be lost. we are ready for this, well, taking into account our own interests. believe me. will come time. now such turbulence in your language speaks of great difficulties, but this is what we are in the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth year. i am sure there will be serious changes in the world, including how belarus has long gone beyond the assessment of bilateral relations, we and alexander grigoryevich confirmed this, because his speech was very concentrated and contained a lot of meanings in various directions, at least three and a conversation with the poles, because it was more about this, we concretized conversation, of course, the belarusian people and the polish people will spend too much financial effort and, in general, efforts

in order to build a system of regional security and logistics and just give it all away for the sake of, for example, peace's ambitions, at the current stage, the poles are weighted people the pragmatic president has repeatedly spoken about this, the moment will come when it will be possible to conduct a dialogue with them not with the authorities, but we cannot talk. about poland we always talk about warsaw today. and one more very important point, changes which we are waiting for and the president said 24 and 25 years. eh, this is not something radically new. the new one is the deployment of the processes that we are witnessing today and the president. marked a very important direction. this is economics and technology. well, our favorite political sphere, the weakest sphere is the political one. in our minds, the binding to the elections of the united states of america is firmly entrenched, we are waiting for them and

we are hoping for some result, but hegemon, the one that we created for ourselves, it no longer exists. no matter how much we talk, uh, that he governs poland poland itself governs itself to a much greater extent, so all is well. sounds absolutely. i would like, uh, really in poland they thought like that, how to speak, but here the doo- appears and his mouth is not visible. here he sees that, relatively speaking, his neighbors in the east are ready to lend a hand. and they do not look like those who want normal good neighborly relations. well, now there is an election campaign going on, so the president will sharply change his rhetoric, by the way, speaking about this, he would say that in the coming months before the elections we cannot count on the fact that some kind of conversation is a dialogue word, i would cancel it altogether, because it is impossible, but a conversation, and after the end of this hysteria of the election campaign. it has definitely begun. it means that it no longer manages anything,

because it is not an independent economy that has long belonged to them. this time, the second is all welfare. poland - this is money from america to fight russia and belarus what the president said, it means that europe will not go anywhere from us. that's true europe is nowhere from us will not go away, and she will wake up. she is already waking up. it will become independent, sovereign, we want it. here is such an independent sovereign european union, and warsaw is planting. and what the president said. if only they broadcast it on european channels. 90% of europeans would say, do we want another? why lie? why are we told every day? what is belarus or russia or pmcs? wagner wants to attack us, yes, who needs you, by the way, when we talk about peace, is it that what lukashenka and belarus are doing is not aimed at peace. yes even tactical nuclear weapons are here for the world, if it is removed today the risks of attack are higher, and today there across the ocean they know today

the washington post wrote the truth. if someday warsaw takes this idiotic decision to attack belarus, it will be destroyed in two blows. and it's true, that's why we do everything for the world. they are for the war. join our conversation such a question. maybe, well, purely speculate, of course. and what are we to do here? we reason, looking at what's going on, the president said 24,205, and we know, but especially on the internet, well , fix it for alexander lukashenko. that he is a strong forecaster , trying to listen to those layings that he gives. what do you think, what did alexander lukashenko mean? the fact is that yes, in fact, global alignments are determined around this period, because in fact, er, what he writes about. generally. today, the american press is good. there is an analytical press that biden did, in general , probably making a mistake by positioning ukraine as the struggle of the states for their hero, and everyone knew the answer to the question. what will happen if

the states would win, but no one thought of answering the question. and what price will be the loss, because then the question arises. and why is nato needed after all, the senate is that this is an organization for the sale of insurance for the sale of security for the sale of guarantees there are thousands of members of such a terrible organization, it is crying 2%, and no one will attack you. ah, so it's a business much more than anything else. but if nato does not provide a guarantee, and it turns out that it does not provide then the question. what is the money paid for? what will happen cost and how the americans will be able to keep their hero, realized what exactly today we do not see, two trends one trend - this is where biden tries, as the game constantly doubles the stakes by throwing him that ever new new thing. it is clear that there is absolutely no sovereignty, that is, it will say to go. this was an old question. and who is more important, for example, in the same poland, coca-cola or the government is larger? her answer in favor of coca-cola is yes, because she controls

the mass to a much greater extent, both in general and as a key owner of key assets. and so here is one trend - this is, accordingly, the doubling of rates by the united states. the second trend that we see that is developing is the countries of the non- western world, which are talking about, generally speaking, the order should be a little different. he must be fair. it must be non-manipulative. it should be, in general, quite interesting, acceptable to everyone, and in this regard, we see that china's initiatives for some reason staunch the initiative from latin america to the african initiative, yes, that is, belarus, yes, again advocated a constructive peace talk for regional security that can be expanded, and we see that, in general, there is one agile approach from the west and very balanced approach from the non-west. yes, where, in general, the world is watching. and what is actually more interesting and what where where exactly? where is the truth, right? that is, who, in general, is trying to appropriate their own. a narrow decimal goal because hegemon is a very

unpleasant situation. because once a hegemon you sit on top of a mountain and then you try to push those who gets closer to him, that it makes no difference who they are friends, enemies, allies, not allies, there is only a rigid hierarchy, but we are talking about another world about a just world. here, belarus and i think that in the near future it will become more often than a blitz. i think that she will soon become a member of the show with and this is not the western world on other grounds of fair grounds, which are actually much more constructively interesting in slightly different senses. it needs individual meaning. where you can explore the moon and do not make transgender people. if we return to the conversation. about poland, we extend our hand in warsaw , maybe not even to warsaw, but to those poles who want war there are many in poland who are ready to lend a hand in return. we do it not in vain, and at the level of society there will always be many such people, well, the system will always be. and it grinds them for sure, you can understand that

society is extremely rarely subjective only at critical moments. i remember. i often bring everything. uh, the quote was about democracy, how she says that democracy is the worst kind of government. if you take into account everyone else, i then ask a question. a what country was churchill talking about because britain is there anarchy, that is , there is no democracy there, but it turns out he was talking about democracy. as a kind of colonial government, when powerful it is quite normal quite effectively. in general, govern other countries. they will be sure that they themselves are quite confident in making these decisions, that is, more in this regard, it is a very understandable , controlled country, managed on the basis of ownership of assets, but on the basis of compromising evidence, which is probably on the leadership, which is probably on the e , guide competing list. uh, the same civil consent, and in this regard. in general, there is no need for any illusions about management. we have our this step is more for the future. yes, this is an attempt

to look at other elites, when other elites arise, they either arise in an explosive way. yes, either the numbers, the second ones decide that they can become the numbers first , it can be different at some point, when it turns out that the course that it is is dangerous, it leads to bankruptcy, and it does not allow reaching another snippet for this topic. there will be an opportunity to continue. yes, please, and with the poles it is necessary to talk and instructed the prime minister to contact them, that if they want, let's talk. let's improve relations, we are neighbors, and neighbors do not choose. they are from god, well, they have october 15 to know the main parliamentary elections. and this is a parliamentary republic and, of course, they need to escalate the situation now in order to, uh, show that they properly armed the country and rearmed, so it’s unlikely that before october 15

they will go for some significant changes that are beneficial to them and to us, they demand a lot from us and we cannot go for it permanently, because it is contrary to our interests. well, basically, it's poland that's escalating the situation here, pushed with the west. not even the west americans made a bet to the americans. e, to poland, but the poles are not stupid people - these are our people, they are slavs, they understand everything perfectly, let's wait and see, but we are open for cooperation. it's not weakness that we reach out anymore. this not an attempt to solve all these problems, that we are afraid of something, afraid of attack, afraid of aggression. no, it's power. this is an understanding of what neighbors really are. we will not choose in any way, belarus as it stood here, it will remain so. poland must understand that in 100 years it is possible to build a wall, it is possible

to build a dome around poland because the wall from migrants has been submitted to a referendum. yes, and i'll just quote the secretary of defense. marisha oblachko, who in the social network x is the former twitter e, wrote the fourth question will concern the wall. do you support you eliminate the barriers on the border of poland for what it is done? yes, the ruling party, the president said correctly, must prove that all of its policies, which were so aggressive, that they are defending poland, and they are supposedly defending the entire european union , are positioning themselves more, as the saviors of europe from belarus and russia, they must prove it, so refer. i would advise the polish sejm to bring another dome for consideration around poland because the wall did not save the americans from the mexicans and will save. what is a wall, how to escape from migrants with a wall. this is pr. this is money. it's just theft. build a dome. but what should they understand? all the same, there is no getting away from us, and the president is right. he also says why they are infuriated by the visa-free regime.

after all, the easiest way is to stand belarusian. sometimes i hear such conversations. let's close everything. everything, in general, we will stop any relationship, let no one in. this is a weakness. we show strength , thousands of poles come here, 1,000 lithuanians , and the polish government is shaking with hatred. with foreign shares. well, he said, we cannot prohibit lithuanians from traveling with propaganda. let's get licensing. this is their weakness. they get mad about it. they dream that belarus will go completely to international organizations, so that we do not participate in the olympic games. and what kind of policy does our athletes support, if an athlete. i am ready to act in such difficult conditions and win this is our strength, and not weakness and such a policy. we will continue andrey petrovich how do you watch me all this? well, of course, a very interesting question is put forward there are only four of them, but among them is this fence, which they shot 5.5 meters in height, they put it in such an interesting way, but it’s just that the builder turned out to be an expensive fence, where they invested millions of

zlotys. and now we propose to determine whether we need a referendum, well, in my opinion, the question will be obvious, the answer will be obvious to people. they are tried every day. as they say , to persecute in the confrontation between east and west in their media, what is there in the east. there the evil of all evil gathered together, the russians, together with the belarusians, invited the pmcs and are trying with regard to the blessed oak, yes , and also the route with a nuclear baton, in addition , of course, how any pole will treat this today. well, what are we going to say? 93% support nato's actions. in poland, the population, this means that they are being dripped on their brains every day, show them where the good ones are, where the bad ones are, and yesterday the parade, which was held on august 15 , showed that in andrzej duda's rhetoric has nothing absolutely peaceful, everything is directed everything, firstly, is riddled with such

russophobia and anti-soviet, and everything points to the fact that we must protect the polish people, first of all, therefore we must arm ourselves. we need to attract even more loans. for all this and more. here the head of state correctly said the year 24-25 is very important for us. they are important not to show us for real how the alignment of forces has changed, no, the alignment of forces, the first thing we will see will be in the thirties and after the thirties. you can see all the concept papers that are accepted bloc of nato and the united states is what directs today precisely. in poland, they are all charged precisely with bringing everything up to thirty. and clearly marked. who are opponents, who are friends, and practically every step of how they will act is spelled out, you just need to carefully look at these documents. they are in the open, what is in closed publications there in general, i think it’s even scary to imagine these issues, for example, in combat documents such as field manuals. there is a clearly cut-drawn organizational

regular structures of the russian federation and the procedure for the use of nuclear weapons at these facilities and everything else, but why is 24-25 important . for us, this is an intermediate nearest our task. these are elections in our country and elections in the russian federation at this time, if we conduct the elections correctly and conduct the way the elections should be held in our opinion. they are according to the standards that europe is offering us today and is being drawn there in every possible way, because for now we will live by these standards. we will never guess. what they want from us, and the twenty-fourth twenty-fifth year. after that, we must clearly understand, can we create? a stable first political system a stable economic and military system of the third component. yes, you can talk about all nine areas to me no doubt. they are important, but these are the three fundamental kets, on which we must first of all create a base that will give in the future. we have the opportunity for our state

to act. uh, on an equal footing in our region, and the fact that yes, the prospect is shos. this i think is the most immediate prospect yet it is understood by the prospect of brix without any doubt east vector for us. today, this is the most important thing that gives us support, that from which we can push off in order to then go back, unlike poland, unlike the west, we never went there with the crusades. you look at the poles, yes, they say that's right, they are slavs. they are ours today we are already there faced with questions of genetics. we see that we even have the same gene code there, for one, but they look at the expense of the fact that they at one time separated by faith, right? in terms of culture , they became strangers to us, because they constantly came here with a cross, like a campaign, not in the tenth year , some citizens saw inside one state, and there they did not become their own . and today they will be between the hammer and the anvil all their lives. you understand this as right in the holy scripture. yes, what should be between what and what can be sinful in the west, they say about our elections. you

would be right to say that by their standards. here smart diplomats are not fools who impose sanctions, what do they say, and what have we done in belarus after all, before we had the opportunity of soft power through funds through the fifth deck through political parties that we financed public organizations to somehow influence public opinion, belarus we, with our aggressive policy, are the ones that were carried out. look what belarusians are doing. they threw out all the possibilities of soft power from belarus and they are sitting and leaving. fools removed us from belarus altogether, so we said correctly the elections of the twenty-fourth year will be held according to our standards. let their standards be forgotten. once and for all, only the belarusian people will decide. how to elect whom to elect, where to elect and no fifth column. i'm happy for the first time 24 years will pass without a fifth column for 30 years. we had a fifth column, but now it won't be, but it won't be. here on this let's energy, yin, let's add holguin to our conversation. add i would pay

attention to the referendum, because it makes no sense, too, very much, except for the fence. here is this fence. ah, the precedent. the republic of belarus as an independent state is mentioned in the referendum as a separate issue, this issue is debatable, of course. many will find different meanings. but i think that this is a precedent and such a rather serious one, and it is unlikely that we will find the next stories, if we look close, and such an inclusion. i think that if the poles had been told in 1920 that the republic of belarus would someday be featured in a referendum, then it would probably have been from the category of some kind of fabulous. history, but today it is. i think for us this is a positive result. a and. uh, when we are talking about the proposals of alexander grigorievich, i would not say that we are extending our hand. i would say that we invite you to talk on an equal footing, because when we extend our hand, it means that our position is weaker, our position

today is very strong and stable, these poles. they say, uh, practically. everyday that history needs to be written today, the poles have a great chance. and you need to write the history of the region today, including the worlds, but belarus has already done it. step forward. we delayed for the first time also history here and the starting point will start from us, poland is late. but we are talking about poland now, we can keep it in mind , of course, we understand ukraine, that when we talk about factory work with poland and the european union, we are aware that the peace track should be set up there, huh? in this case, it still rests on well, in the same ukraine, we understand that it’s not zelensky, that completely different people stand behind him, but on the one hand they broadcast their attitude in the form of the fact that this is some kind of peace plan zelensky is perceived in moscow as a surrender plan for russia, which is unacceptable? the new york times asked peskov. he said that

there is no basis for an agreement with kiev now and that moscow will continue a special military operation for the foreseeable future, and they are specifying. that is, if russia has plans to represent the new territory of ukraine, peskov replies that no, we just want to control all the territories that are currently registered in our constitution as ours, that is, in order to, let’s say, wake up all these ties, we must to deal with the situation in ukraine turns out like this ah. i think that peace treaty peace talks are by far impossible because the spectrum of problems is their issues that have been accumulating for decades. and it cannot be resolved overnight , including on the battlefield, but it will inevitably be stopped by a truce. and here, too , a platform will be developed in order to be able to go further. this is the transitional period. he will be very much before you comment and would like to briefly cite such a fact, perhaps it will be from him

comfortable. even somewhere to push off to add additional colors, unfortunately, not bright to our conversation, in general. this is the desire of the zelensky team so that you do not fight to the last ukrainian. she hits the ukrainians better than any lancets. and this is considered among the population. here is such a betrayal of the indicators of questions from grad cut. what are you most afraid of asked the ukrainian soldiers in the trenches. so the main thing that 72% are not afraid of is that after the war the state simply takes care of them, it turns out that most of the male population, which they are now fighting on the side of ukraine they are afraid that people are on the bank, if heroes are needed, then only posthumously , of course, this is also what the national building of ukraine is aimed at, if you look at both the ukrainian game and the cult of heroes, this is still the cult of a dead hero that is , in order to become a hero you need to die. that is, it turns out that the concept of motherland is

such a very childish concept, and, moreover, it is absolutely not christian. that is, you die, then you become a hero. here is the cult of the dead hero. this is what lined up, in general, together with the lingual consoles of the last years, probably 8-10 quite actively, because in fact in poland we notice the same thing. this is very close to objective programming. and in my opinion, we said in one program that, in principle, a normal person comes from the three categories of the system. yes, that is, when there is, and good and evil is a measure that allows them to balance, and a person is manipulated and bent into two categories. his thinking stops and all thinking comes down to choosing the side which is presented to him correctly, that is, one is presented white, the other is presented black, and then i will make the right choice. yes, that is, a person turns into an ant, and not into an independent creature. why is christianity in this plan? so important? yes, because the same three categories are the same christian trinity that

makes you think, makes you stay human, as soon as there is a transition between two categories, there is a transition from faith to paganism. yes, that is, a very rigid manipulated thing that is happening now in love absolutely perfect plan. and this is absolutely not accidental. this is also a solid plan. that is, on the one hand, brazilian such black jokes have already appeared, something like a man who exterminated almost all bandera in ukraine from this side. in general, it came up, but nevertheless, it turns out that yes, because ukraine, like poland, is a classic western model of governance. alliance with the elites at the expense of their own societies. so in this regard, the elites will be fine with them. with him , and everything will be in order financially in everything else, even with the place of residence. but their society will have to pay, and this is, in general, a system model that has been working successfully in the anglo-saxon model in terms of strength for about 200 years. in general

, there are and have been failures in such special critical ones, but only on our territory. this is, say, the layer of the october revolution and so on. here in this regard. unfortunately, it's all sad. yes, that is, here it will not go any differently. if we talk about the course of hostilities, about the same truce, because in fact deed. why did peskov say about the territory that the territory is not included in the goals of the military campaign ? for god's sake, the war becomes as if not achieved due to the military victory, for this russia will have to capture most of the territory of ukraine at least the whole of ukraine also the second option, that is, in any case, these three principles, they remain unavoidable, and thus they will be reached the tenth question. that is, the territory is not. in general, some kind of goal here is achievement. here are these three principles, and the territory

is a means with an instrument of achievement. for this purpose, what is offensive in all this is that when we now hear a statement literally by the leadership of ukraine that they are not ready not only for some kind of negotiations, but to talk on the terms of any russia, they will not immediately understand that the negotiations will not between ukraine and russia and negotiations will be only between the united states of america and russia is this tragedy of the ukrainian people that they do not solve anything. in general, i don’t want to say anything, that i think there will still be several million veterans. yes, and the main part will be those who did not fight, in general, did not come close to the front. but this, in principle, is how everything is arranged in ukraine now. and the armed conflict itself is only what it is fraught with so that well, let's talk objectively. this is fraught with the fact that within this state there will be still heat up. uh, well, the civil strife split is definitely an enemy, there will be no enemy , again ukraine will be divided into the west and the east

, you know, well, there will also appear this neofos neo-nazi movement, which is now progressing there in the literal sense of the word. as for the armed conflict in ukraine itself, i think that it will last for more than one year. nobody benefits. today, neither one nor the other side is negotiating, because there are no common ground through which they can be conducted ukraine today once again needs to be understood, if it is more a dependent state, where and what they say to do, then ukraine today has already become simply a territory on which an armed conflict is being played out between the two sides, this may be the first such proxy, a serious conf. between west and east, and we are traveling so far that the russian federation is actually alone . yes, they are fighting against, well, 50 countries of the west are fighting quite successfully. the russian federation is a very strong state on it has a huge, both military and human potential. well, look, she finds it necessary to call there only 300.000 from to mobilize 300.000 people. she believes that at the moment these forces are sufficient

to introduce defensive actions. now imagine the military potential that we could remember there from the time of the great patriotic war or something else, how quickly this conflict could end, but i say again that the question is imperfectly not raised in ukraine as a state, but the question is worth those in the interests of the global interests that were said before the start of the special military operation and were voiced. she said in ukraine knew what you are saying that russia only mobilized 30,000 people. even in ukraine, people understand. she says, listen if russia wants to. she will bomb everything here, why do they only bomb warehouses. why are aircraft factories bombed, because nato is waging a war against russia in relation to the war, and russia is conducting a special military operation about belarus and the poles let them remember the polish leadership with them, a special there will be no military operations, they will simply be merged, wiped off the face of the earth, so that it’s not possible to carry out a walkie-talkie in poland, then it will be carried out in the next 2-3 years,

we will continue the conversation through the poles without translation in a couple of minutes. stay with us. we continue africa nigga. she, especially for narrow specialists , will also say a neger, but since she sees from him the french colonial spirit. still niger for reference, both pronunciations are acceptable. so the tension remains on the one hand the position of the niger authorities. and those who is ready to support a neighbor could have their hands on the suction on the other side of the conductors of interests in paris and washington on the continent, rather than waiting. this is a big war, but today there is still a bargaining going on, and it’s quite interesting, because e we see that there, if it’s lulu loot, which it very much demonstrated that adults will lead the conversation. yes, that is , a macron is not needed, an adult immediately came to decide, but you adults also did not decide anything further on the topic of leaks that exist in the states , for example, compliance will absolutely suit american interests while completely

throwing out the french. here, too, to the question of allied relations on those leaks that exist. and the option of a serious conflict , provided that not all african countries are ready to fight, there are nigers, so that sufficiently large armed forces are ready to fight there. so far, we have also taken the position of bargaining. and what will you pay us what you will give, that is , the president on the one hand of nigeria turned to his parliament in order to send troops there to the parliament - this decision was blocked, that is, the position is indicated auction place your bids. well, for now, this is the situation. who? what bets will he make, because even the question arises, is there a compromise option when france will remain without uranium, europe will remain without damage, but the united states will remain with its assets, which are quite important to it, that is, the states, for example, such an option was absolutely arranged. it would have fixed the colonial status of europe, yes, that is, in this

regard, it is not if the scientific development option is a military version of the code under which, say, the same wagner will enter. in a nigga and in general, she niger will join four other countries where wagner is present at all and is even present quite actively. moreover, these options can be combined, taking into account that the united states, as a rule, all of these throw their broadcasts. that is, it can start from the first option, then naturally flow into the second, and at the same time, a large-scale conflict is somehow not very hard to believe today. for the simple reason that france does not have the resources for this united states and the resources for this no. and the presence of russia, china, uh, in africa is quite serious. that is, here further the question arises that everything the west was preparing for two became an instant. these are ukraine and taiwan but africa was not included in the plans at all and to carve out resources for the conflict. in africa , it is possible only through the first and second, and there are

strategic things, that is, in this regard. eh nigga. it may well slip through this peaceful option. when national interests are realized, when control over the national resource is so, except for uranus there by by and large, there is nothing right now, but they are trying. here they said about the mirny track, uh, they are considering an option. that is, as long as it goes. as you said , the new niger leadership is trying to raise stakes, trying to introduce its own diplomatic track. here is the new leader of niger, the head of the national council for the salvation of the motherland, general abdurakhman chini. uh, a little earlier announced readiness for negotiations through, this is the first. secondly. he indicated that the desire to resolve the problems that arose before the country exclusively by peaceful means, by the way, he is orthodox, i wanted that, which is also very important, that i wanted to say two interesting things. here he supported about uranus. and the europeans are used to being tilted. they will be happy to buy americans for this. uranium is also being bought by naftogaz now and you say that you have strengthened your

independence and sovereignty will explain the second point to people later. see how americans spend. chaotic politics, but for the whole european union they tell. you must uphold your principles as soon as these events began. in our country, it’s like if there is a coup d’etat in the country, if these people support the russian federation, these are bandits, if they made a state transfer and said, we will fight russia, the whole european world and in the usa they said the democrats came to power. they need to be supported, finally, the example of myanmar well, what is happening there, for the sake of democracy , hundreds of officials are being destroyed, terrorist attacks are being killed, the americans are silent, applauding, everything is fine. but there is one more moment when the americans came to the talks. they go out to negotiations. we are ready to recognize the regime, where the principles are first and second. i would like to return to the moscow security conference, which was there the situation in nigeria was considered and there is one trend

that needs to be understood in nigeria against the background of the events that are taking place in ukraine against the background of the success of the russian federation. the fact that russia has become independent, these are the trends in africa they will continue. after all, the whole world is looking at russia. they understand that nato was not so omnipotent. the only thing i'm with you i do not agree. this is what i think, that just such a big war for africa will await us all. africa no one will give it back. everyone understands perfectly well that africa is now strategically an element of the future for europe for the usa but let's gather me again so only one digit will not leave. yes, africa , after the end of the bipolar confrontation , began to live relatively, the ears of the west 14 times. yes, so, that is, there are questions about what this confrontation was, if there was no ukraine

, then, probably, we would have seen a completely different scenario in africa and e. taiwan would not then have served as some kind of barrier to the implementation of such an armed scenario, but niger is already the fourth. yes, but niger is already the fourth episode in africa, and this is how it works, uh today, the united states and in resources, my colleagues are constantly saying, uh, just in favor of my thesis that there will be negotiations on ukraine, because uh, the exhaustibility of resources was noted by all participants in today's discussions. uh, and the united states can't scatter all over the world today. here is a situation that just shows it. and as for, and the struggle for interests? yes, of course, uh, both the united states and europe have africa in mind but haven't kept it for a very long time. but there is a radical change in the situation. unfortunately, they cannot, if

they did not have such resources, then china would not be able to gain a foothold. in uh in africa for it to cause such heated discussion and anxiety at the beginning of the twenties, that is, they already missed africa, so today's scenario is such an armed russian experts, i join in the majority, and foreign ones do not consider such an increase in conflict and an armed scenario. but this is good for our region as well. this is a kind of new model being built. we may not see it yet, but i think these are the events of the week. this is, such a certain element in what will happen in our world, a military man. how do you see it come to this large-scale clash, which will change the general balance of power in the world. well, firstly, i would like to say here it was very correctly noted that the roots go. well, absolutely africa is, as it were, a consequence of the

policies that are taking place. you look at the beginning in europe, they began to land a little on germany, this is the first european economy, so that, as they say, it would stop politically and economically influencing these events that are taking place around in order to weaken the european union, the second kit on which europe stands this is france and france today is, in fact, one colonial power, the last one, probably, which has remained. it also has a french one in south africa. well, she has polynesia too. it has the southern french islands of its territory, the southern is an island, kergelennye everything else. that is, in essence, today france was set to begin, as they say in chess, any next movement will be more conflict there , there will be a conflict. in any case, it will be directed against france. well, imagine there, how many different structures are involved. we don't take. this is the african union as a whole, which is, as it were, more of such an advisory body. although he has his own military

structures there. but they are stuck everywhere in mozambique and it is unlikely that today the african union will use its armed units there, the ecowas organization, which is promoted as an economic, well, first of all, it has very serious military forces. well, how seriously, according to the latest data, they have already collected, supposedly about. twenty-five thousand, of course , nigeria is headed by this powerful state. she alone there, in principle, managed, there are about 160,000. he has an armed forces of only about 100,000 ground troops. but if in this situation eco really enters you and returns, uh, muhammad abazuma back to his place, then they are unlikely to give this france the opportunity to use these bowels again, which will surely have some other other force that will already on other grounds to transfer this uranus well, what to hide uranus france buys from a niger for

sells for 1808. can you imagine what kind of realism there really is, because what distinguished those colonies that were still there when they simply deviated. it’s not near nezma that the metropolia used to be responsible for what happens in the colony, but now the metropolia doesn’t give a damn about who cuts whom? who is killing and who is doing what in general. and the most important thing is to pump out all the resources from there to get the maximum profit, and today these countries have really rebelled against this all inside this africa, and so these conflicts do not stop. we just think collide armies or not to collide. yes, there, if you look at more than 100 nationalities of peoples, there, uh, and just everything that is mixed in there, you just say that there is arab africa, black africa and so on, white africa, yes, where is there, uh, and so on. that is, it is a colored continent in itself, but it is being torn apart everywhere. there you can, all the more so, see the development of all mankind conditionally, you can say in the same case you can see, starting from cannibalism and

ending with socialism. understand all these elements. here is this system of development humanity. to say that there will be an armed conflict there. i think that, most likely, everything is moving towards this, because we need a serious redistribution of the world, we will remake the world, without military conflicts. there will not be a military conflict not like that. what do you think, do you think the american troops landed with him will know, as usual, how they do in the middle east, that's when we say you are right say how many interethnic conflicts are in africa, and who finances them, and who does what travel on a permanent basis continued so that's the point western politicians play off, and arm, and then support one side, then the other they cut each other out. they reconciled them, they took their assets, the judges are fighting, because of which someone pits them, in addition to these religious issues, americans hate when they judge and shiite and live in peace. they are these negotiations that have taken place between them for them. it was a tragedy, they need africa to

constantly blaze. so they did the same with ukraine. they are the same with belarus. we're done by civil war oleg sergeevich, they need a civil war. by the way, what did you think about it resonates with what we talked about about europe and what is happening in africa, and perhaps we can now draw some main conclusions from what we said today . look at the international anti-fascist congress. well, in general, it’s amazing, and such a verdict to our time that in the 21st century , instead of the whole world exploring new planets there, the correct evolution is to develop technologies. that is, we again again forced to face this social ugliness called fascism, which is not just some kind of degeneration. here, of course, is an evolutionary and artificial tool that he plans to use. here, as it were, we reached such a moment, we thought that in the 20th century our grandfathers finally finished

it off. for the last 400-500 years, when the anglo-saxon language develops. uh, imperialism, because let's not forget that every 6 days there will be no such country celebrate their independence day from great britain that is, it was a global empire with global management tools and know-how. well, again, let's say that the last one is bright, but the hubs were developed back in the middle of the 19th century, when britain realized how to manage and manage by cognitive programming there, and flashing it when some kind of concept was abandoned. and you already know what the results are. he will come to bed in 10. that is, here is the brilliant knowledge that the british received. basically, random. this is a separate issue. somehow it turned out you are leading to the fact that the international anti-fascist congress can even specify. and the anglo-saxon thing is that fascism is essentially what is it?

this is the same theory of exclusivity, when you consider yourself a subject, and the rest of the world is an object , but sorry, it originated in britain somewhere else in the 17th century, that is, when britain came out it positioned that it had its own world, when british conservatism arose. this is what, this is your own world, where the rule operates, and the external one says, and there these rules, maybe not apply this object. that is, in this regard, i will remind one philosopher who spoke about german fascism. he says that the germans did what they did clearly what the british always meant. that the british in this regard, in fact, proceeded from this, the whole british empire, that there are still first-class people, that is, well, first of all, these are aristocrats, yes, which means there are about 1,000 years of history that appeared there from from the time of william the conqueror, and this is a squirrel, has not gone away on controls the situation and there are all the others. that is, fascism is always the positioning of the fact that there are the elect and

there are those who can be considered, and not people. and this paradox is so convenient that every time when this is forgotten, when , in principle, justice in one format or another is forgotten, it will always arise, that is, the question. uh, not only in the need to eliminate fascism. yes, and you need to approach from the other side to its currents, but to the one who allows himself to consider himself exclusively a creation in the world, and to treat the rest as objects. yes , i think that anti-fascist congresses in the republic of belarus this is already another second one. uh, not a fight against something new, not about fascism, not about nazism. uh, it's a question of memory. you see, we must always remember. i think this is not the last one they should be held every year. and we do not choose neighbors alexander grigoryevich said, but we must remember that people living next to us are peoples who initiated two world wars. we are all obsessed with world war ii.

it seems to be more than a memory, but after all , two wars went through the republic of belarus and no one has yet answered the question of what it was, what prompted them. uh, to use such means in the center of europe, which today looks super-democratic, which dictates some conditions to us, but we remember their past and the congress is the memory of those who died. and here in the republic of belarus in the russian federation and in general in the post-soviet space, and this is a reminder to them about that. what they were, because they already forget their history a little. but we are we cannot forget it, so this is the natural course of things for us. this is not a fight with something new. it's a reminder of what was and what will never go, indeed it will always remain someone above someone below and uh, democratic principles. that is, that's all that is universal. uh, canvas, which we are offered today. it has completely become a weapon of democracy - it is a weapon

of human rights - it is a weapon of the rule of law. this is a weapon. we are an anti-fascist congress - this is still a struggle, and you know with all this i would like to remember the immortal film like 17 moments of spring and the dialogue between müller and stirlitz, and when müller spoke about the party's gold and contribution to the future. he said very interesting words. the fact that if somewhere sometime instead of the words, hello, you hear the word heil in relation to any individual, then you should know there they are waiting for us from there. we will begin our great revival . look how real these prophesying words are. today they work in the same europe, look what is happening today in ukraine, look at what is happening everywhere in all countries. the same thing for latvia is the most important thing that can be said that at the beginning there is always a black clear form,

as nazism is born today. yes, it has roots there from the end of the 19th to the beginning of the 20th century. well , look how it takes roots at the beginning , anti-sovietism is sure to go. russophobia and then nazism, you always unequivocally understand these three actions following each other. why today young people are again beginning to perceive in essence this nazi concept, because it offer and say your people. he towers over all other people. you are not like everyone else, you understand this here is the law of the aryans and that all the others are under you , it seems to elevate a person above himself, and when, on the contrary , internationalism is presented. all people are equal independence of the skin and everything else is really needed here. these are the human prices nastya absorbs into himself. well , the same. what role does the church play today? the same church it

becomes, how can we talk about the konsentupol patriarchy as the basis for creating sectarianism instead of orthodox churches on the territory of ukraine and there today everyone zigs in the order of things that the nazis, in essence, in their essence, are again starting to march across our europe, and here the head of state has very correct words. he said, while we walk and take our children to the brest fortress, while we visit, the mound of glory, believe me, fascism will never come here, and we will have a historical memory, and it will remember something for us, we have something to oppose 2 minutes literally remains. yes it is fascism the tool was there and will have to tell the truth today. he raised his head again , torchlight procession, again they kill for what you speak russian, again they kill for nationality. but there is one plus. they wanted to isolate us, and they didn’t want us to become outcasts, and today the whole world is uniting around belarus and russia

what happened in moscow what will happen in minsk how many countries come here, because our cause is just and we will win, like our food , and we will destroy fascism in another way. no. yes, i just wanted to add parts of the definition good thing that fascism is appropriating the right to rob another due to the fact that it is not like you and this is it. eh, just the same absolutely unacceptable things, because the world must be established, and in other principles on the principles of fairness justice in relation to all. strictly speaking, on what we stand thank you very much fixed. hey, i think that's a good conversation. got it today. i thank our participants for today everything. why change city benefits for life in

the belarusian outback i don’t like it, i’m a city city it's a fuss. this aggression is hard for me in the city. i'm faster on the field and the discharge is catchy, as if it's village life is simplicity, these are all the people that surround me, neighbors, they are all very simple, benevolent people, they don't have any envy or malice to find out. why rural life is still better than city life and complete several household tasks. as i understand it, this is some kind of return to the city, my wife will ask me. well, as i say, i had two big bites, the positive side. you haven't broken yet. not a single fishing rod, how far did i go? 100 meters the most difficult the noisiest the longest 100 meters in my life, watch the show i am from the village on our tv channel. every week

, the heroes of the project go in search of adventure, do not be surprised at the next task that brought me here to the thicket. they don't even realize. where will their fate take them this time. today you are going to osipovich. this is the mogilev region. imagine how historical this city is for the first time in written sources. it is mentioned on february 25, 1593 along with we follow them and interesting places and sights of belarus were located on this hill, from which a stunning view opens, it is here that two rivers merge. and berezina is god's chair. and it grants wishes. someone sees on the stone. the face of the mother of god with the baby, and someone cross, watch the program stone,

paper scissors on our tv channel. olga