[000:00:00;00] norway denmark netherlands germany france spain portugal cyprus austria switzerland italy greece romania serbia croatia poland lithuania latvia estonia set the satellite dish to the express am8 satellite, the signal of the channel is broadcast in the clear and is available 24 hours a day every day be with belarus 24 tv channel and discover, belarus hello greetings to all who are with us now. if you want

peace, prepare for war as relevant as ever. so let's start with this topic, we fix provocations the ministry of defense of belarus reported that that over the past two weeks belarusian servicemen have detained several people. a drone operator was also detained, who was trying to launch an aircraft on the territory of one of the volsky units. in addition , several attempts to fly over a protected area were prevented by means of electronic warfare, in principle, our guests andrey petrovich, which means that we will not have to relax and won't leave us alone. well, we are not relaxing , it should be noted that firstly, well, such cases, they happen regularly. violation of truly military facilities in protected areas. second, of course. it should also be noted that hmm, when suppressing objects that are guarded by the armed forces, we must remember that this is always an act. well, this violation can be followed after that as an administrative or

criminal liability. well, and most importantly, i would like to say that in any case, today you enter there, when you get to the territory of a military facility there, or completely different laws that are determined not just by some general rules established or by the legislation of the word, in addition, there are charters for garrison guard services. mouths of the internal service, which give the right to the military to use weapons in case of disobedience or in the event of a clear attack on an object. this is what everyone should remember. you still think everyone has heard of this case by an airplane, 50. when was the flight and the terrorist act against this aircraft made? we all see how the situation is developing in the south on our borders on the western borders of our country, the level of terrorist danger is really high and it was the military leadership that decided that all the guards should serve in full

equipment with ammunition and related systems that allow, firstly, to organize surveillance and reconnaissance. second, monitor the situation. third. these units are like guards and outfits. they are reinforced by, uh, duty units and rapid response units. well , we also have new tools. this electronic warfare electronic suppression is correct to say in these objects and that's it. this is also coordinated together not just by the military separate militia. a separate kgb everything. it works in a single system, so we have the ability to quickly open , detect and, uh, act accordingly. why were these five cases just presented, because they are already out of a row. out there appeared people who don't just engage in that pampering that's often the case. i spoke at the beginning of the cases. this pampering. it's just that the boys want to climb onto the object or something else. well, there are different cases, but here it is the photo and video filming of military

facilities that are already being dealt with. uh, state security agencies , police agencies, and i think that an important point will be announced in the near future, a large-scale conference on international security is speaking there, our minister of defense. viktor fucking. i outlined several fundamental positions of the republic of belarus very clearly. i will briefly dwell on two. although i recommend that you listen carefully to immerse yourself in it. in the near future , a new edition of the concept of national security will be adopted, the minister announced. that is, essentially. this suggests that we are keeping up with the times, that is, well, we react clearly to what is happening and once again sent the necessary signals to those who do not get it from the first second third time. we will do everything, the minister said, so that no one tries to tell the belarusians. how to live on their own land and added our army is ready to repulse anyone, then will try to encroach on the independence , sovereignty, territorial integrity and constitutional order of the belarusian

state and its allies that we live in a peaceful country. it's not an accident, it's not luck. this is the painstaking work of the secret services of the president's state. otherwise, we would not live in a mine country. everything would have been destroyed. if the war were already blazing, attempts to destabilize the situation in the country did not stop and the dreams of the west would not stop that belarus would be geopolitically deployed from russia turned into anti-russian foothold, but only for this we need them, these dreams have not gone away. for many years they did everything for this to happen, this and coup d'état, this is an attempt inside. country, and now also external influence and the minister of defense was extremely frank. he told the truth, if today belarus had not done everything for security over the years. it's not just tactical nuclear weapons. this is not only a joint russian grouping, it is also our army, which we have been strengthening throughout all these

years, long ago the west would have attacked belarus and no need to be under any illusions, ever. the west was not afraid to attack some country when they were sure of their victory the second moment. today is the moment. why did the minister of defense focus on poland poland is not an independent state today today this country is extremely dependent on the united states of america and can without the knowledge of the polish people. do not ask, in fact, the poles do not want to fight. these are our neighbors. this is not necessary, they can be thrown into the furnace of war, do not ask, because everyone sees it. why there are more provocations on the border with belarus now. and look, what is happening in ukraine every day, russia methodically continues to solve the assigned tasks in the west, you already grab your head. how to prolong the war? how to make sure that the victory of russia was not? eh, this is good, it is necessary to extend the war further, so there will be more provocations of terrorist attacks on the territory of belarus, there will be more destabilization of attempts, there will be more.

especially by the twenty-fourth year for the elections and by the year 25, in no case relax interesting while the west demonizes us with all its might. at least it tries, but we see by the way delegations come to us, how we develop relations in those countries that used to be called distant arcs, but judging by, we understand that they are close to us, more than ever e cannot be demonized in that world , in which they defined for themselves, nevertheless, against the backdrop of all the aggression that our neighbors, which oleg sergeevich said, here we are watching poland ukraine and i commented on the moments, meeting with the staff of the national airport , i propose to listen to one of the fragments now, and then we will definitely discuss it again , i emphasize that we are not going to fight with anyone. i'm telling you, this is all the time, therefore we are peaceful people. we want to cooperate with everyone. yes, now we live at the expense of , first of all, the east of russia, china

to cooperate. well, do not forget about you to look for technological, west, they are nearby. they are our neighbors the european union and relations with them should not be lost. we are ready for this, well, given our own interests. believe me. the time will come. now such turbulence in your language speaks of great difficulties, but this is what we are in the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth year. i'm sure there will be major changes in the world. including here is such a position. how do you like belarus has long gone beyond the assessment of bilateral relations, we and alexander grigoryevich confirmed this, because his speech was very concentrated and contained many meanings in a variety of areas, at least three and a conversation with poles, because it was more about this, we specified the conversation. of course, the belarusian people and the polish people will

spend too much financial effort and effort in general in order to build a system of regional security and logistics and just give it all away for the sake of, for example , ambition. empis. at the current stage, the poles will not work, people are balanced , pragmatic, the president has repeatedly spoken about this, the moment will come when it will be possible to conduct a dialogue with them not with the authorities, but we will not can talk. about poland we always talk about warsaw today. and one more very important point, the changes of which we are waiting for and the president said on 2425. eh, this is not something qualitatively new, cardinal new, this is the deployment of the processes that we are witnessing today and the president. marked a very important direction. this is economics and technology. well, our favorite political sphere, the weakest sphere is the political one , in our minds, the binding

to the elections of the united states of america is firmly entrenched, we we are waiting and hoping for some result, but hegemon, the one that we created for ourselves, it is no longer there. no matter how much we talk about the fact that he rules poland, poland itself rules itself to a much greater extent, so yes, here we are, everything is fine. sounds absolutely. i would like, uh, really in poland they thought like that, how to speak, but now dudov is inferior and his lips are not visible. here he sees that, relatively speaking , they are ready to lend a hand to his neighbors in the east and they do not look like those who want to be normal good neighborly relations. well, now there is an election campaign going on, so the president should change his rhetoric dramatically, by the way, speaking about this, he would say that in the coming months we cannot count on the fact that some kind of dialogue is a dialogue word before the elections, i would cancel it altogether, because it is impossible , and conversation e after completion. uh, this

campaign hysteria. it has definitely begun. this means that poland does not manage anything, because it is not an independent economy that belongs to them for a long time. this time, the second is all welfare. poland - this is money from america to fight russia and belarus what the president said, it means that europe will not go anywhere from us. this is true europe will not go anywhere from us, and it will wake up. she is already waking up. it will become independent, sovereign, we want it. such is the independence of the sovereign european union, and warsaw is planting. and what the president said. if only they broadcast it on european channels. 90% of europeans would say, do we want another? why lie? why are we told every day? what is belarus or russia or pmcs? wagner wants to attack us, yes, who needs you, by the way , when we talk about peace, is it that what lukashenka and belarus are doing is not aimed at peace. yes, even tactical nuclear weapons are here for the world, if today they remove

the risks of an attack higher, and today they know across the ocean today the washington post wrote the truth. if someday warsaw takes this idiotic decision to attack belarus, it will be destroyed in two blows. and it's true, that's why we do everything for the world. they are for voyich. join our conversation such a question. maybe, well, purely speculate, of course. and what are we to do here? we argue, looking at what is happening, the president said 24,205, and we know, but especially on the internet, what well, for alexander lukashenko, secure. that he is a strong forecaster , he tries to listen to the forecasts that he gives. what do you think , what did alexander lukashenko mean ? uh, what he writes about. generally. today, the american press is good. there is an analytical press that biden did, in general , probably making a mistake by positioning

ukraine as the struggle of the states for their hero, and everyone knew the answer to the question. and what happens if the states win, but no one thought about answering the question. and what price will be the loss, because then the question arises. and why do we need nato after all, nato is that this is an organization for the sale of insurance for the sale of security for the sale of guarantees there are thousands of members of such a terrible organization, it cries 2% no one will attack you. ah, so it's a business much more than anything else. but if nato does not provide a guarantee, and it turns out that it does not provide then the question. what is the money paid for? and what will it cost and how will the americans be able to keep their hero? what exactly is it really? today? can't see two trends one trend - this is where biden tries to like the game of constantly doubling the stakes by tossing him that all new new stuff. it is clear that there is absolutely no sovereignty, that is, it will say to go. it's old there was a question. and who is more important, for example, in the same

poland, coca-cola or the government is larger? her answer is in favor of coke. yes, because it manages the massive to a much greater extent, as in general, so the key is fished from the key assets. and so here is one trend - this is, accordingly, the doubling of rates by the united states. the second trend that we see that is developing is the countries of the non- western world, which are talking about, generally speaking, the order should be a little different. he must be fair. he should not be manipulative. it should be, in general, quite interesting, acceptable to everyone, and in this regard, we see that the initiative of china for some reason turned away the initiative from latin america to the initiative of africa, yes, that is, belarus, yes, again , supported a constructive peace we are talking about regional security, which can be expanded, and we see that, in general, there is one agile approach from the side of the west and very balanced approach from the side, no, the west. yes, where, in general, the world is watching. and what, in general, is more interesting where exactly where? where is the truth, right? that is,

who, in general, is trying to assign their narrow selfish goals, because the hegemon is a very unpleasant situation. because once a hegemon you sit on top of a mountain and then you try to push those who get closer and more with your feet. it doesn’t matter who they are friends, enemies, allies, not allies. there is only a rigid hierarchy, but we are talking about a different world about fair ones, belarus and i think that in the near future it will become more often than a blitz. i think she will soon will become a member of the shels, and this is not the western world on other grounds, on honest grounds, which in fact are much more constructively interesting, slightly different meanings. it needs individual meaning. where you can explore the moon and do not make a transgender. if we return to the conversation. about poland, we extend our hand in warsaw, maybe not even to warsaw, but to those poles who want war there are many in poland who are ready to lend a hand in return. we are not doing this in vain, and at the level of society there will always be such people

a lot, well the system always. and it grinds them, that is, one can understand that society is extremely rarely subjective only at critical moments. i here remember often all bring. uh, the quote was about the democrats. she says that democracy is the worst kind of government. if you take into account all the rest. i even ask a question. what country was churchill talking about ? britain is there anarchy, that is , there is no democracy there, but, it turns out, he was talking about democracy, as a type of colonial government, when powerfully quite normal quite efficient. in general, govern other countries. they will be and are sure that they themselves are quite confident in making a decision, that is, more in this regard is a very clear, controlled country, managed on the basis of ownership of assets, but on the basis of compromising evidence, which is probably on the leadership, which is , leadership competing list. uh, the same civil consent, and in this regard. in general, there is no need for any illusions

about management. our this step is more likely to perspective. yes, this is an attempt to look at other elites, when other elites arise, they either arise in an explosive way. yes, either numbers second will decide that they can become numbers first. yes, it can be different at some point, when it turns out that the course that it is is dangerous, it leads to bankruptcy, and it does not allow reaching another fragment on this topic. there will be an opportunity to continue. yes, please, and with the poles it is necessary to talk and instructed the prime minister to contact them, that if they want, let's talk. let's to improve relations, we are neighbors, and neighbors do not choose. they are from god, well, they have october 15 to know the main parliamentary elections. and this is a parliamentary republic and, of course, they need to escalate the situation now in order to, uh, show that they properly armed the country and

rearmed, so until october 15 they are unlikely to make any significant changes that are beneficial to them and to us, they demand a lot we can’t go for it permanently from us, because it’s contrary to our interests. well, basically, it's poland that's blowing up here. environment pushed with the west. even outside western americans, americans have made a bet. e, to poland, but the poles are not stupid people - these are our people, they are slavs, they understand everything perfectly, let's wait and see, but we are open for cooperation. the fact that you reach out your hand is no longer a weakness. this is not an attempt to solve all these problems, that we are afraid of something, afraid of attack, afraid of aggression. no, it's power. this is an understanding of what neighbors really are. we will not choose in any way, belarus as it stood here, so it will be

stand. poland must understand that in 100 years it is possible to build a wall, it is possible to build a dome around poland because the wall from migrants has not been submitted to a referendum. yes, and i'll just quote the secretary of defense. marisha oblachko, who in the social network x is the former twitter e, wrote the fourth question will concern the wall. do you support the elimination of the border barrier. poland was the ruling party, correctly the president said , it must prove that all its policies, which were so aggressive, that they are defending poland, moreover, they are still supposedly defending the entire european union, positioning themselves more as saviors to europe from belarus and russia , they must prove this, therefore the referee. i would advise the polish sejm to bring another dome for consideration around poland , because the wall did not save the americans from the mexicans and will not save them. what is a wall, how to escape from the haymarket migrants. this is pr. this is money. it's just theft. build a dome. but what should they understand? all the same , there is nowhere to escape from us, and the president is

that's right, he also says, why does the visa-free regime infuriate them. after all, the easiest way is belarus . and sometimes i hear such conversations. let's close everything. everything, in general, we will stop any relationship, let no one in. this is a weakness. we show strength, thousands of poles come here, and in 1,000 lithuanians and the polish government , the minister of foreign affairs is shaking with hatred, what did he say? we cannot prohibit lithuanians from traveling by propaganda. let's introduce licensing. this is their weakness. they get mad about it. they dream that belarus will go completely to international organizations so that we do not participate in the olympic games. what kind of policy does it have for athletes, if an athlete? i am ready to act in such difficult conditions and win this is our strength, and not weakness and such a policy. we will continue andrey petrovich how do you watch me all this? well, of course, a very interesting question is raised , there are only four of them, but among them is this fence, which they shot 5 1/2 m high, in general, they put the question to the builder in such an interesting way. we ended up building

an expensive fence. where are millions invested? zł. and now we propose to determine whether we need a referendum, well, in my opinion, the question will be obvious, the answer will be obvious to people. they are tried every day. as they say , to persecute the confrontation between east and west in their media, what is there in the east. there, the evil of all evil gathered together, the russians, together with the belarusians , invited pmcs and are trying to get along. yes, and they are still waving a nuclear baton, in addition , of course, how any pole will treat this today. well, why already we will say 93% support nato's actions in the polish population, this means something that every day they are dripping on their brains , it clearly shows where the good is, where the bad are, and yesterday the parade, which was held on august 15, showed that it was andrzej in rhetoric. duda, there is nothing absolutely peaceful, everything

is aimed at everything, firstly, it is riddled with such russophobia and anti-soviet, and everything points to the fact that we must protect the polish people, first of all, therefore we must arm ourselves. we need to attract even more loans. for all this and more. here the head of state said the right thing for us very important 24 25 year. they are important not to really show us how the alignment of forces has changed, no, the alignment of forces, the first thing we will see will be in the thirtieth year and after the thirties. you look at all the concept documents that have been adopted by the nato bloc and the united states, this is what is leading poland today, they are all charged precisely with bringing everything to 30. please, moreover, they are clearly marked. who are opponents, who are friends and almost every step of how they will act, you just need to carefully look at these documents. they are in the open, what is in closed publications there in general, i think it’s even scary to imagine these issues, for example, in combat documents

such as field manuals. there i will clearly find the organizational and staff structures of the russian federation and the procedure for the use of nuclear weapons at these facilities and everything else, but what is the importance of the twenty-fourth twenty-fifth year. for us, this is an intermediate nearest. our task. these are elections in our country and elections in the russian federation at this time, if we conduct the elections correctly and conduct the way the elections should be held exactly according to our views. they are according to the standards that europe is offering us today and to draw them in in every possible way, because for now we will live by these standards. we will never guess. what do they want from us, and the twenty- fourth twenty-fifth year. after that, we must clearly understand, can we create? a stable first political system a stable economic and military system of the third component. yes, you can talk about all nine areas, i have no doubt they are important, but these are the three fundamental pillars on which we must first of all create a base that in the future will enable us

to act in particular for our state. uh, on an equal footing in our region, and the fact that yes, the prospect is the sco. this, i think, is the most immediate prospect. all this is already understood by the prospect of brix without any doubt. eastern vector for us. today, this is the most important thing, it is what gives us support, what we can push off from in order to then go back, unlike poland, unlike west, we never went there with the crusades . you look at the poles, yes, they say that's right, they are slavs. they are ours today, we are already confronted with questions of genetics, and we see that we even have the same gene code there and for one. well, do not look at the expense of the fact that they once separated by faith, right? in terms of culture, they became strangers to us, because they constantly came here with a cross in 2010, they saw some inside one state, but there they did not become our own. and today they will be between the hammer and anvil you understand this as right in the holy scriptures. yes, what should be between what

and what may be in the west, they say about our emissions. you would be right to say that by their standards. here are smart diplomats who are not fools who impose sanctions, what do they say, and what have we done with belarus after all, before we had the opportunity of soft power through funds through the fifth deck through political parties that we financed public organizations to somehow influence public opinion , belarus we are our own aggressive policies that were carried out. look what belarusians are doing. they threw out all the possibilities of soft power from belarus and they are sitting to survive fools removed us from belarus altogether, so you correctly said the elections of the twenty-fourth year will be held according to our standard. let him forget the standard. once and for all, only the belarusian people will decide. how to elect whom to elect, where to elect and no fifth column. i'm happy for the first time 24 years will pass without a fifth column for 30 years. we had a fifth column, but now it won't be, but it won't be. here on this let's energy, yin, let's add

olgievna to our conversation. add i would pay attention to the referendum, because yes , there is also a lot of sense in it, except for the fence. here is this fence. uh, there is a precedent for the republic of belarus as a country, an independent state is mentioned in the referendum as a separate issue. this is a debatable issue, of course. many will find different meanings. but i think that this is a precedent and such a rather serious one, and we are unlikely to find it in the next stories. here, if we look close, and such an inclusion. i think that if the poles had been told in 1920 that the republic of belarus would someday be featured in a referendum, then it would probably have been from the category of some kind of fabulous. history, but today it is. i think that this is a positive result for us. a and. uh, when we are talking about the proposals of alexander grigorievich, i would not say that we are extending our hand. i would say that we invite you to talk on an equal footing, because when we extend our hand, it means that our

position is weaker than our position today day very strong and steady these poles. they say, uh, practically. everyday that history needs to be written today, the poles have a great chance. and you need to write the history of the region today, including the worlds, but belarus has already done it. step forward. we delayed for the first time also history here and the starting point will start from us more late. but we are talking about poland, now we can keep it in mind, of course, we understand ukraine, that when we talk about interaction with poland with the european union , we are aware that there should be configured? peaceful track, huh? in this case, it still rests on well, on the very same ukraine, we understand that it’s not zelensky that there are completely different people behind him, but on the one hand they are broadcasting their attitude in the form of the fact that this kind of zelensky’s peace plan is perceived in moscow as capitulation plan for russia that is unacceptable?

the new york times asked peskov. he said that there was no basis for an agreement with kiev now and that moscow would continue a special military operation for the foreseeable future, and they clarify. that is, if russia has plans to preside over the new territory of ukraine, peskov replies that no, we just want to control all the territories that are currently registered in our constitution as ours, that is, in order to, let's say, wake up all these ties, we need to figure it out with the situation in ukraine, it turns out like this, ah. i think that peace treaties and peace negotiations are currently impossible because of the spectrum of problematic issues that have been accumulating for decades. and it cannot be resolved overnight on the battlefield either. including, but e truce stop it will be inevitable. and here, too , a platform will be developed in order to be able to go further. this is the transitional period. he will be very before you comment. i would like to briefly

cite this fact, perhaps it will be convenient from him. even somewhere to push off to add additional colors, unfortunately, not bright to our conversation, in general. this is the desire of the zelensky team so that you do not start fighting to the last ukrainian. she hits the ukrainians better than any lancets. and it is considered among the population as such a betrayal of the revealing polls. from degrees what are you most afraid of asked the ukrainian soldiers in the trenches. so. the main thing that 72% are not afraid of is that after the war the state simply cares about them, it turns out that most of the male population who are now fighting on the side of ukraine they are afraid that people are on the bank, if heroes are needed, then only posthumously, of course , but it is also aimed at the national construction of ukraine if you look at both the ukrainian game and the cult heroes is still a cult of a dead hero, that is , in order to become a hero you need to die,

that is, it turns out that the concept of the motherland is such a very pagan concept, and moreover, it is completely non-christian. that is, you die, then you become heroes. this is the cult of the dead hero. this is what was built, in general, along with the language consoles of the last years, probably 8-10 quite actively, because in fact, in poland, we notice the same thing. this is very close to objective programming. and in my opinion, we spoke one of the former gears that, in principle, a normal person comes from the three categories of the system. yes, that is, when there is, and good and evil is a measure that allows them to balance, and a person is manipulated and bent into two categories. his thinking stops and all thinking comes down to choosing the side that is presented to him correctly, that is , one is represented by white, the other is represented by black, and then i will make the right choice. yes, that is, a person turns into an ant, and not into an independent being. why is there christianity in this regard? so important? yes, because the same three categories

are the same christian trinity that makes you think, makes you stay human, as soon as there is a transition between two categories, there is a transition from faith to paganism. yes, that is, a very tough manipulated thing, what is happening now in the lavra is not an absolutely clear plan. and this is absolutely not accidental. this is also a solid plan. that is, on the one hand, brazilian such black jokes have already appeared, something e. a man who exterminated almost all bandera on ukraine from this side. in general, it came up, but nevertheless, it turns out that yes, because ukraine, uh, just like poland, is a classic western model of governance. alliance with the elites at the expense of their own societies . so in this regard, the elites will be fine with them. with him, everything will be in order financially, financially, in everything else , even with the place of residence. but their society will have to pay, and this is, in general , a system model that works successfully in

the anglo-saxon model of fear of years somewhere 200. in general, failures in such special critical ones. if there were, then only on our territory we will say what about the october revolution and so on. here in this regard. unfortunately, everything is sad, yes, that is, it will not go any differently here. if we talk about the course of hostilities, about the same truce, and in fact, why peskov said about the territory of the territory, are not included in the goals at all military company goals of the military company were declared to putin where, on certification, elitism and the neutral status of ukraine, as if they could not be achieved for due to the fact that these conditions will be accepted by the ukrainian leadership, for god's sake, the war at this moment becomes as if not achieved due to the military victory, for this russia will have to seize most of the territory of ukraine at least all of ukraine also the second option, that is, in any case, these three principles , they remain unavoidable, and thus they will be reached the tenth question. that is, the territory is not. in general, some kind of goal here is achievement. here

are these three principles, and the territory is a means with an instrument of achievement. there is an offensive goal in all this, that when we now hear the statement literally by the leadership of ukraine that they are not ready not only for some kind of negotiations, but to talk on the terms of any russia, they will not immediately understand that the negotiations will not be between ukraine and russia, and the negotiations will be only between the united states of america and russia , this is the tragedy of the ukrainian people, that they do not solve anything. in general, i don’t want to say anything, that i think there will still be several million veterans. yes, and the main some will be those who did not fight, in general , did not come close to the front. but this, in principle, is how everything is arranged in ukraine now. and the armed conflict itself is only what it is fraught with so that well, let's talk objectively. and this is fraught with the fact that inside this state it will continue to heat up. uh, well, the civil strife is clearly a split of the enemy, there will be no enemy, again

ukraine will be divided into the west and the east , you understand, well, there will also appear and obviously this neofos neo-nazi movement, which is now progressing there in the literal sense of this words. as for the armed conflict in ukraine itself, i think that it will last for more than one year. nobody benefits. today, neither one nor the other side is negotiating, because there are no points of contact along which they can be conducted . ukraine today must be understood once again. if poland is a dependent state, where and what they say to do, then ukraine today has become simply a territory on which an armed conflict is being played out between the two sides, it may be the first such proxy, a serious conf. between west and the east and we see so far that the russian federation is actually alone. yes, they are fighting against, well, 50 countries of the west are fighting quite successfully. the russian federation is a very strong state on it has a huge, both military and human potential. well, look, she finds it necessary to call there only 300.000

from to mobilize 300.000 people. she believes that at the moment these forces are sufficient to introduce defensive actions. now imagine the military potential that we could remember there since the great patriotic war or something else, how quickly this conflict could end, but once again i say that the question is imperfectly not raised in ukraine as a state, but the question is those interests of global interests that were said before the start of a special military operation and were voiced . she said in ukraine knew what you are saying that russia only mobilized 30,000 people. even in ukraine, people understand. she says, listen if russia wants to. she would have bombed everything here, why do they only bomb warehouses. why are aircraft factories bombed, because nato is waging a war against russia in relation to the war, and russia is conducting a special military operation about belarus and the poles let the polish leadership remember there will be no special military operations with them, they will simply be wiped off the face of the earth. god, so as not to carry out a walkie-talkie in poland, then it will be held in

the next 2-3 years of sand by the poles not a coup, in a couple of minutes we will continue the conversation. stay with us. we continue africa niger and, well, especially for narrow specialists i’ll also say a neger, but because he sees from him the french colonial spirit. still niger for reference, both pronunciations are acceptable. so the tension remains on the one hand the position of the niger authorities. and those who are ready to support the neighbor could have their hands on the sucker, on the other hand the conductors of interests in paris and washington on the continent. ah, before the great war, but today the orcs are going on , and it’s quite interesting, because we see that there, if it’s, well, here, which very much demonstrated here, what to bring the conversation will be adults, yes, that is, a macron is not needed, an adult immediately came to decide, but you adults also did not decide anything further on the leaks that exist in the states, for example,

it will absolutely suit the observance of american interests while completely throwing out the french. here, too, to the issue of allied relations by the type of leaks that exist. and the option e of a serious conflict, provided that not all african countries are ready to fight, nigeria is there so that sufficiently large armed forces are ready to fight there. that's while she too took up a bargaining position. and what do you pay us what you give, that is, the president on the one hand of nigeria , but turned to his parliament in order to send troops there to the parliaments - he blocked this decision, that is, the position of bargaining is indicated, make your bets. well, for now, this is the situation. who? what bets will he make, because even the question arises, can there be a compromise option when france will remain without uranium europe will remain without damage, but the united states will remain with its assets, which are important quite realistic, that is, the states, for example, absolutely satisfied with this option. it would

have fixed the colonial status of europe, yes , that is, in this regard, it is not if the scientific development option is a military option, in which, say , the same wagner will enter. in niger and in general, she niger will join four other countries where wagner is generally present, her presence is quite active, also not an excluded option, moreover, these options can be combined, given that the united states, as a rule, all such throw their own broadcasting. that is, it can start from the first option, then naturally flow into the second, and at the same time, a large-scale conflict is somehow not very hard to believe today. for the simple reason that france does not have the resources for this, the united states and the resources for this are not. and the presence of russia, china, uh, in africa is quite serious. that is, here further the question arises that all the west was preparing for two clashes. these are ukraine and taiwan but africa was not included in the plans at all and to carve out resources for the conflict. in

africa is possible only at the expense of the first and second, and there are strategic things, that is, in this regard. eh nigga. it may well slip through this peaceful option. when the national interests are realized, when the control over the national resource is so, except for uranium , there is by and large nothing now, but they are trying. here they said about the mirny track, uh, they are considering an option. that is, as long as it goes. as you said , the new niger leadership is trying to raise stakes, trying to introduce its own diplomatic track. here is the new leader of niger, the head of the national council for the salvation of the motherland, general abdurakhman, and a little earlier , the central committee announced that you were ready for negotiations. this is the first. secondly. he indicated that the desire to resolve the problems that arose before the country exclusively by peaceful means, by the way, saying that he is orthodox, i wanted that, which is also very important, that i wanted to say two interesting points. here he supported about uranus. and the europeans are used to being tilted. they will be happy to buy

americans for this. uranium as well as now buy neftegaz and you say that you have strengthened your independence and sovereignty will explain the second point to people later. see how americans spend. chaotic politics, but for the whole european union they tell. you must defend your principles as soon as these events began. in our country, it’s like if there is a coup d’état in the country, if these people support the russian federation, these are bandits, if they made a state transfer and said, we will fight russia, the whole european world and the democrats said in the usa came to power. they need to be supported, finally, the example of myanmar well, what is happening there, for the sake of democracy , hundreds of officials are being destroyed, terrorist attacks are being killed, the americans are silent, applauding, everything is fine. but there is one more moment arrived, when the americans come to the negotiations, they come out in sentences. we are ready to recognize the regime, where the principles are first and second. i would like to return to the moscow security conference, which was there the situation in

nigeria was considered and there is one trend that must be understood in the book against the backdrop of the events that are taking place in the ukraine of success russian federation on the background. the fact that russia has become independent, these are the trends in africa they will continue. after all, the whole world is looking at russia. they understand that nato was not so omnipotent. the only thing i disagree with you. this is what i think, that just such a big war for africa will await us all. africa no one will give it back. everyone understands perfectly well that africa is now strategically an element of the future for europe for the usa but let's collect another opinion olga grina most likely that yes, yes, but here again the question is, where will they get the resource, the argument that your arguments that africa will not leave just a figure like that. yes, africa, after the end of the bipolar confrontation, began to live relatively, the ears of the west 14 times. yes, so

, that is, there are questions about what this confrontation was, if there was no ukraine, then, probably, we would have seen a completely different scenario in africa and e. taiwan would not then have served as some kind of barrier to the implementation of such an armed scenario, but niger is already the fourth. yeah but nigga - it's already fourth episode. uh, in africa, and this is how it works, uh, today, the united states and in resources, my colleagues are constantly saying, uh, just in favor of my thesis that there will be negotiations on ukraine, because uh, all participants have fixed the exhaustibility of resources today's discussions. uh, and the united states can't scatter all over the world today. here is a situation that just shows it. and as for, and the struggle for interests? yes, of course, uh, the united states and europe have africa in mind, but they don't.

for a very long time. but there is a radical change in the situation. unfortunately, they cannot, if they did not have such resources, then china would not be able to gain a foothold. in africa, in order for this to cause such a heated discussion and anxiety in the early twenties, that is, they have already missed africa, so you are today's scenario , such an armed russian experts, i join in the majority and foreign ones do not consider such an increase in conflict and an armed scenario. but this is good for our region as well. this is some kind of new the model is being built. we may not see it yet, but i think these are the events of the week. this is a certain element in what will happen in our region. as you see, it will come to such a large-scale clash, which will change the general balance of power in the world. well, firstly, i would like to say here it was very correctly noted that the roots go. well, absolutely africa is, as it were, a consequence of the policy that is taking place. you see at

the beginning in europe they began that a little bit to land germany is the first economy european in order to, as they say, politically and economically cease to influence these events that are taking place around in order to weaken the european union, the second c&t on which europe stands . this is france and france today is, in fact, one colonial power, the last, probably the one that remained. she also has french guiana in south africa. she also has polynesia. it has the southern french islands of its territory, the southern is the island of kerguelen, and everything else. that is , in essence, today they put france. uh she began, as they say in chess, any next movement will be more conflict there will be a conflict. in any case, it will be directed against france. well, imagine there, how many different structures are involved. we don't take. this is from the african union as a whole, which, as it were, is more of such an advisory

body, although it has its own military structures there. but they are stuck everywhere in mozambique and it is unlikely that today the african union will use its armed units there, the ecowas organization, which promoted as an economic, well, first of all, it has a very serious military force. well, how seriously, according to the latest data, they have already collected, supposedly about. 25,000, of course, nigeria is headed by this powerful state. she alone there, in principle, managed, there are about 160,000. he has an armed forces of only about 100,000 ground troops. but if in this situation eco really enters you and returns e muhammad abazuma back to his place, then it is unlikely that they will give the opportunity to use this france again these bowels that are available in the world, for sure, there will be some other force , which will transfer this uranium on other grounds. well, to be honest, france

buys uranium from a niger for 12 dollars, and sells for 1808. can you imagine what kind of in fact, not about the colonists, because what distinguished those colonies that were still there, when they simply rejected it near nezma, before the metropolis was responsible for what happens in the colony, and now the metropolis and she doesn’t give a damn who cuts whom, who kills and who what there does, in general, these most important thing is to pump out all the resources from there to get the maximum profit. and today these countries have really rebelled against all this inside this africa so these conflicts do not stop. you just think whether the army will collide or not. yes, there, if you look at more than 100 nationalities of peoples, there is and everything that is mixed there, you just already say that there is arab africa, black africa and so on, white africa, yes, where is it, and so on. that is, it is colored the continent itself, but it is torn apart everywhere, there you can, all the more so, to see the development of all mankind conditionally, you can say in the same

niger you can see it, starting from cannibalism and ending with socialism. understand all these elements. here is the system of human development to say that there will be an armed conflict. i think that, most likely, everything is moving towards this, because we need a serious redistribution of the world, we will redo the world, without military conflicts. not only the military conflict is not like that. how are you think, do you think american troops landed no, bulka as usual, as they do, they are in the middle east. that's when we say you are right. say how many ethnic conflicts there are in africa, and who finances them? and whoever does that the traveling on constantly continued so this is the essence of western policy to pit, and to arm, and then to support one side, then the second they cut each other out. they reconciled them , took the assets of the sunya. you shiites are fighting, because of which someone pits them, in addition to these religious issues, americans hate, when sunni and shia both live in peace. they are these negotiations that have taken place between them for

them. it was a tragedy, they need africa to constantly blaze. so they did the same with ukraine. they would do the same with belarus. here, they would need a civil war, sergeyevich, they need a civil war. by the way, what did you think about this echoes what we said about europe and what is happening in africa, and perhaps we can now draw some main conclusions from this what they said today. watch the international anti-fascist congress. here, in general, it is surprising, and such a verdict to our time, that in the xxi century , instead of the whole world there to explore new planets. ah, it’s right to evolve to develop technologies, that is, we are again and again forced to face this social ugliness called fascism, which is not just some kind of degeneration. here, of course, is an evolutionary, but an artificial tool that he plans to use. here's how to get to that point. we thought that in the 20th century, our grandfathers finally finished off, it turned out that

no the point is that the basic concepts that well let's put it this way. for the last 400-5 years, when anglo-saxon e, imperialism has been developing. let's not forget that every 6 days such a country celebrates its independence day from great britain. that is, it was a global empire with global management tools and know-how. well, again, i will say that the last bright nohabs were developed back in the middle of the 19th century when britain figured out how to govern, and govern by way of cognitive programming there. uh, flashing the brain, when some concept is abandoned, and you already know what the result is. he will come in 10 years. that is , here is the brilliant knowledge that the british received. basically, random. this is a separate issue. somehow it turned out you are leading to the fact that the international anti-fascist congress. it can even specify the international anti- anglo-saxon. the fact is that in essence. this is what it is, this is our theory

of exclusivity, when you consider yourself a subject, and the rest of the world an object, but sorry, it originated in britain somewhere else in seventeenth century. that is, when britain is taught the opposition that it has its own world, when british conservatism arose, then that this is its own world, where the rule operates, and the outside world is where you have the rules, maybe not to apply this object. that is, in this regard, i will remind one philosopher who spoke about german fascism. he said, says that the germans did what. they made it clear that the british always meant that the british, in this regard, from this, in fact, proceeded from this, all british empire that there are still people of the first class, that is, well, first of all, these are aristocrats, yes, which means there are about 1,000 years of history that appeared there at one time, the wilhelms the conquerors. and it's a white heap, hasn't gone anywhere. she controls the situation and eats everyone else. that is, fascism is

always the positioning of the fact that there are the elect and there are those who can be considered, and not people. and this paradox is so convenient that every time it is forgotten, when it is forgotten, in principle. in one format or another, it will always arise, that is the question. uh, not only in the need to eliminate fascism. yes , but you need to approach its origins from the other side, and to the one who allows himself to consider himself exclusively a creation in the world, and treat the rest as objects. yes, i think that anti-fascist congresses in the republic of belarus this is another second one - this is not a struggle. with something new , neo-nazism does not have fascism. uh, it's a question of memory. we must always remember. i think this is not the last one they should be held every year. and we do not choose neighbors alexander grigoryevich said, but we must remember that people living next to us are peoples who

initiated two world wars. we are all obsessed with world war ii. it seems to be more than a memory, but after all , two wars went through the republic of belarus and no one has yet given an answer, but to the question, what was it? what prompted them to use such means in the center of europe, which today looks super-democratic, which dictates some conditions to us, but we remember their past and the congress is the memory of those who died. we have in the republic of belarus in the russian federation and in general in the post-soviet space. and this is a reminder to them of what they were, because they already forget their history a little. but we cannot forget it, so this is the natural course of things for us. this is not a fight with something new. this is a reminder of what was that will never go away, indeed , it will always remain someone above someone below and democratic principles. that is, that's all that universal, er, canvas, which we

are offered today. she is completely all democracy has become a weapon - it is a weapon of human rights - it is a weapon of the rule of law. this is a weapon. we are an anti-fascist congress - this is still a struggle and this is quite interesting. for what do you know? recall the immortal film such as seventeen moments of spring and the dialogue between müller and stirlitz, and when müller spoke about the party's gold and contribution to the future. he uttered very such interesting words about what if somewhere ever instead of words. hello you will hear the word heil in relation to any individual, then you should know there they are waiting for us from there. we will begin our great revival. look how real these prophesying words are. today they work in the same europe, look at what is happening today in ukraine, look at what is happening everywhere in all countries. the same thing for latvia is the most important thing that can be said

that at the beginning there is always a black clear form, as nazism is born today. yes, it has roots there from the end of the 19th to the beginning of the 20th century. well, look how it takes roots at the beginning, anti-sovietism is sure to go. russophobia and then nazism , you always clearly understand these three actions following each other. why today young people are again beginning to perceive this nazi concept in its essence, because your people are offering it and saying it. he towers over all other people. you are not like everyone else, you understand this here is the law of the aryans and that all the others are under you , it seems to elevate a person above himself, and when, on the contrary , internationalism is presented. all people are equal independence from themselves such a skin and everything the rest is really needed here. these are human prices. nastya absorbs well, the same thing. what role does the church play today?

the same church, it becomes, as we can talk about the conceptuality of patriarchy, the basis for the creation of sectarianism instead of orthodox churches on the territory of ukraine and there today . again they begin to march across our europe, and here the head of state said very correct words, while we walk and take our children to khatyn in brest fortress, while we are visiting, the mound of glory, believe me, fascism will never come here, and we will have a historical memory. and we have something to remember. we have something to oppose 2 minutes literally we have left. yes, fascism was a tool and it will be necessary to tell the truth today. he raised his head again, torchlight procession, again they kill for what you speak russian , again they kill for nationality. but there is one plus. they wanted to isolate us. they wanted us to be

an outcast, and today the whole world is uniting around belarus russia what was in moscow what will be in minsk how many countries come here, because our cause is just and we will win, like the nasheeds, but we destroyed the fascisms and there is no other way. yes, i just wanted to add parts of the definition of good, that fascism is appropriating to oneself the right to rob another at the expense of being different from you and this is just the same absolutely unacceptable thing, because the world must be established on others principles on the principles of fairness justice in relation to everyone. as a matter of fact, on what we also stand. thank you very much fixed. hey, i think that's a good conversation. got it today. i

thank our participants for today everything. what is the best way to test your erudition and ingenuity with the right tricky questions? name the fabulous jin whom the old man saved because of turning by the soviet boy, and the full name is further well received. this is an absolutely correct answer. hope can still answer this question. is it true that any parallelepiped has all squares, because

that as i remember a rectangle is also a square. the bright star of the night sky in the northern hemisphere is the north star, you ask me, i say, watch intellectually entertaining projects on our tv channel. we know exactly how to start the morning. right? i hope you didn't have breakfast today, because i'm going to feed you and cook a breakfast of champions with you. add light music. calm or more intense, depending on what mood for the day. do you want to ask yourself, together with you we will prepare a delicious breakfast has been talked about and will say 1,000 more times breakfast is the main meal of the day, especially for those who try to live efficiently. today we will be weak with beetroot borax. it sounds interesting, but it seems to me that it is difficult and we will get the charge of the necessary energy on the right hand. we put it,

spread the sandwich with butter on top with the left hand, scroll the shoulders back. we make a full circle, we feel how our shoulder blades are going to shake up and cheerful cheerful went to the new day breakfast of champions. watch on tv channel belarus 24 each of the heroes of the project are doing a very important thing. if we cannot change the fate of the child. we can give him, happy childhood, 14 speech therapists. nine psychologists in any center do not have this, a hedgehog, yet. all tickled on the palm of your hand, antosha we will introduce you to people who have found their calling. each of us came here to help our little patients find their place in life. that's as much as i appreciate the team here. this is life today. i now it is also worth a lot

offer to spend one day with specialists and learn all about the intricacies of their work, the psychologist must undergo personal therapy himself, the psychologist must attend some supervisory events to some extent or previously use wayne about the myths of the space industry. now it is quite actively used in medicine, not rehabilitation is a very complex science. there are a lot of factors that affect the final result, see on belarus 24 tv channel. belarus is not obligatory lyases, blocked rivers and lakes. necrotic nature from which is not maxim to tear off the neck and i'm from belarus -