[000:00:00;00] on the same wagner will enter, uh, into niger and, in general, she will join four other countries where wagner is present and is even present quite actively, also not an excluded option, moreover, these options can be combined, taking into account that the united states is usually always throw their broadcast. that is, it can start from the first option, and then naturally flow into the second, and at the same time, a large-scale conflict is somehow not very hard to believe today . for the simple reason that france does not have the resources for this, the united states and there are no resources for it. and the presence of russia , china, uh, in africa is quite serious. that is, here further the question arises that all the west was preparing for two collisions. these are ukraine and taiwan but africa was not included in the plans at all and to carve out resources for the conflict. in africa, it is possible only through the first and second, and there are strategic things, that is, in this regard. eh nigga. it may well

slip through this peaceful option, when national interests are realized, when control over national resources so, except for uranus, there is by and large nothing there, but they are trying. here it is about the peace track. they said, uh, they 're looking into it. that is, as long as it goes. like you said trying to collect bets new nigga leadership. tries to enter his diplomatic track. here is the new head of the niger, the head of the national council for the salvation of the motherland, general abdurakhman, and a little earlier he was ready for negotiations - this is the first. the second indicated that the desire to resolve the problems that arose before the country exclusively by peaceful by the way, by the way, saying that he is orthodox, i wanted that, which is also very important, that i wanted to say two interesting points. here he supported about uranus. and the europeans are used to being tilted. they will be happy to buy americans for this. uranium is also being bought by naftogaz now and you say that you have strengthened your independence and sovereignty, then for the people, the second moment. see

how the americans are pursuing a pragmatic policy, and for the entire european union they are telling. you must defend your principles as soon as these events began. in our country, it’s like if a coup d’état is taking place in the country, if these people support the russian federation, these are bandits, if they made a state transfer and said, we will fight russia, the whole european world and in the usa they said the democrats came to power. they need to be supported, finally, the example of myanmar well , what is happening there, for the sake of democracy , hundreds of officials are being destroyed , terrorist attacks are being killed, the americans are silent, applauding, everything is fine. but there is one more moment when the americans came to the talks. they go out to negotiate. we are ready to recognize the regime where principles are the first, and, the second. i would like to return to the moscow security conference, which was there the situation in nigeria was considered and there is one trend that must be understood in the book against the backdrop of the events that are taking place in ukraine success.

and the russian federation against the background of the fact that russia has become independent, these trends in africa they will continue because the whole world is looking at russia they understand that nato was not so omnipotent. the only thing we do not agree with you. this is what i think is just such a big war for africa us africa will be waiting for everyone. no one will give up. everyone understands perfectly well that africa is now strategically an element of the future for europe for the usa but let's collect another opinion olga grina most likely that yes, yes, but here again the question is, where will they get the resource argument that africa is not so leaving only one number. why , after the end of the bipolar confrontation, africa began to live relatively, the west is 14 times worse. yes, that is, here, what this confrontation was, if there was no ukraine , then, probably, we would have seen a completely different

scenarios in africa and uh, probably, taiwan would not have served then as some kind of obstacle to the implementation of such an armed scenario, but niger is already the fourth. yes, but niger is already the fourth episode. uh, in africa, and this is how it works, uh, today, the united states and in resources, my colleagues are constantly saying, uh, just in favor of my thesis that there will be negotiations on ukraine, because uh, all participants have fixed the exhaustibility of resources today's discussion. uh, and the united states can't scatter today all over the world. here is a situation that just shows it. and as for, and the struggle for interests? yes, of course, uh, both the united states and europe have africa in mind, but they've had it for a very long time. but there is a radical change in the situation. unfortunately, they cannot, if they had such resources, then china

could not. so to gain a foothold in africa so that it causes such a heated discussion and anxiety in the early twenties, that is, they have already missed africa, so you are today's scenario , such an armed russian experts i join in the majority and foreign countries do not consider such an increase in conflict and an armed scenario. but this is good for our region as well. this is a kind of new model being built. we may not see it yet, but i think these are the events of the week. this is, such a certain element in what will happen in our world, a military man. as you see, it will come to such a large-scale clash, which will change the balance of power in general. well, firstly, i would like to say here it was very correctly noted that the roots go. well, absolutely africa is, as it were, a consequence of the policies that are taking place.

you look at the beginning in europe they began to land a little on germany, this is the first european economy, so that, as they say, it will stop politically and economically influencing these events that are taking place around in order to weaken the european union, the second kit on which europe stands . france and france today is, in fact, one colonial power, probably the last one left. it has and in south africa yes, and french. well, she has polynesia too. it has the southern french islands of its territory, the southern one is the island of kerguelen, and everything else. that is , in essence, today they put france. uh, she started, as they say to chess, any next movement will be there a conflict there will be no conflict. in any case, it will be directed against france. well, imagine there, how many different structures are involved. we don't take. this is the african union as a whole, which, as it were, is more of a deliberative organ. although he has his own military structures there. but they are stuck

everywhere in mozambique and it is unlikely that today the african union will use its armed units there, the ecowas organization, which is promoted as an economic, well, first of all, it has very serious military forces. well, how seriously, according to the latest data, they have already collected, supposedly about. 35,000, of course, nigeria is headed by this powerful state. she alone there, in principle, managed, there are about 160,000. he has an armed forces of only about 100,000 him ground forces. but if in this situation eco really enters you and returns e muhammad abazuma back to his place, then they are unlikely to give this france the opportunity to use these bowels that are available in the world again, for sure, there will be some other other force that will already transfer this uranus on other grounds. well, to hide uranus, france buys from a niger for 12 dollars, and sells for 1808. can you imagine what kind

of colonialism there really is, because what distinguished those colonies that were still when just rejected. here is some kind of onism before the metropolis was responsible for what happens in the colony, and now the metropolis and she doesn’t give a damn who cuts whom, who kills whom and who does what, in general, the most important thing is to pump out all the resources from there to get the maximum profit. and today these countries have really rebelled against all this inside this africa so these conflicts do not stop. you just think whether the army will collide or not. yes, there, if you look at more than 100 nationalities of nationalities, there is and everything, everything that is there mixed only already say that there is arab africa, black africa, and so on, white africa, yes, where is it, and so on. that is, this colored colored continent itself, well, it is torn apart everywhere, there you can , all the more so, to see the development of all mankind conditionally, you can say in the same niger you can see, starting from cannibalism and ending with socialism. understand all these elements. here is the system

of human development to say that there will be an armed conflict. i think that, most likely, everything is going to this, because we need a serious redistribution of the world will remake the world, without military without military conflicts. not only the military conflict is not like that. do you think, do you think american troops landed no as usual, as they do in the middle east. that's when we say you are right. say how many ethnic conflicts there are in africa, and who finances them? and whoever does that the sweat on constantly continued so this is the essence of western policy to play off, and to arm, and then support one side, then the other they cut each other out. they them reconciled took assets sunnis shiites are fighting, because of which who pits them, in addition to these religious issues, americans hate when sunnis and shiites live in peace. they are these negotiations that have taken place between them for them. it was a tragedy, they need africa to constantly blaze. so they did the same with ukraine. they

would do the same with belarus. here they would need a civil war sergeevich , they need a civil war . is happening in africa and perhaps now we can draw some main conclusions from what was said today. look at the international anti-fascist congress. here, in general, it is surprising, and such a verdict to our time, that in the xxi century , instead of the whole world there to explore new planets. uh, it's right to evolve to develop technologies, that is, we are again and again forced to face this social ugliness called fascism, which is not just some kind of degeneration. here, of course, evolutionary, but an artificial tool that he plans to use. here's how to get to that point. we thought that in the 20th century, our grandfathers finally finished it off. for the last

400-5 years, when anglo-saxon e, imperialism has been developing. let's not forget that every 6 days this will not be the country celebrates its independence day from the uk. that is, it was a global empire with global management tools and know-how. well, again, let's say that the last bright nohab was developed back in the middle of the 19th century, when britain understood how to manage and manage by cognitive programming there, and flashing the brain when some kind of concept was abandoned. and you already know what the result is. he will come in 10 years. that is, here is the brilliant knowledge that the british received. basically, random. this is a separate issue. somehow it turned out you are leading to the fact that the international anti-fascist congress. can even flesh out the international anti- anglo-saxon the fact is that in fact. this is what it is. this is our theory of exclusivity, when you consider yourself a subject, and the rest

of the world an object, but sorry, it originated in britain somewhere else in the seventeenth century. that is, when britain positioned that it had its own world, when british conservatism arose, that it was its own world, where the rule operates, while the outside world is where you have the rules, maybe not to apply this object. that is, in this regard , i will remind one philosopher who spoke about german fascism. he says that the germans, what they made it clear, that the british always meant that the british in this regard, in fact, proceeded from this , the whole british empire that there are still first-class people, that is, well, first the turn is the aristocrats, yes, which means that there are about 1.000 years of this history, who appeared there at one time the wilhelms the conquerors. and it's a white heap, hasn't gone anywhere. she controls the situation and eats everyone else. that is, fascism is always the positioning of what is the elect are those who can be considered, not

people. this paradox is so convenient that every time it is forgotten, when it is forgotten, in principle. in one format or another, it will always arise, that is, the question. uh, not only in the need to eliminate fascism. yes, but you need to approach its origins from the other side, and to the one who allows himself to consider himself exclusively a creation in the world, and treat the rest as objects. yes, i think that anti-fascist congresses in the republic of belarus this is another second one - this not a fight. with something new, not about fascism , neo-nazism. uh, it's a question of memory. you see, we must always remember. i think this is not the last one they should be held every year. and we do not choose neighbors alexander grigoryevich said, but we must remember that people living next to you are peoples who initiated two world wars. we are all obsessed with world war ii. it seems to be more than a memory, but after all

, two wars went through the republic of belarus and no one has yet given an answer, but to the question, what was it? what prompted them, uh, to use such means in the center of europe, which today looks super-democratic, which dictates some conditions to us, but we remember their past and the congress is the memory of those who died. we have in the republic of belarus in the russian federation and in general in the post-soviet space. and this is a reminder to them of what they were, because they already forget their history a little. but we cannot forget it, so this is the natural course of things for us. this is not a fight with something new. it's a reminder of what was about what will never go away, indeed , it will always remain someone above someone below and democratic principles. that is, that's all that universal, er, canvas, which we are offered today. it has completely turned into a weapon. democracy is a weapon of human rights. this weapon is the rule of

law. this is a weapon. we are an anti-fascist congress - this is still a struggle. and with this it is quite interesting, for what you know you want. recall the immortal film such as seventeen moments of spring and the dialogue between muller and stirlitz, and when muller spoke about the gold of the party and about his contribution to future. he uttered very such interesting words about what if somewhere ever instead of words. hello. you will hear the word heil in relation to any individual, then you should know there they are waiting for us from there. we will begin our great revival. look how real these prophesying words are. today they work in the same europe, look at what is happening today in ukraine, look at what is happening everywhere in all countries. the same thing for latvia is the most important thing that can be said about the fact that at the beginning there is always a black a clear form of how nazism is being born today.