he acted in his right court, but out of his mercy and love for the church from august 18. the first divine service was held in the holy dormition zhirovichi monastery from there and they gave a start to the procession. every day pilgrims walk from 20 to 40 km. their prayers have already been sounded in the villages with harriers to be silent . irin hillfort is all the same. the procession unites four dioceses and lasts 9 days. by the way, the prayer procession is dedicated to the 850th anniversary. representation of the monk euphrosyne. polotsk now on your screens those villages, agro-towns and urban settlements, which the belarusian procession has yet to go through. tomorrow the crusaders will give to the urban village and the crown of prayer for courage. you can join at any stage of the path, the final point will be the light of the spirits, the cathedral, where will the saturday festive liturgy take place? more

information from my colleagues at 15 o'clock, i say goodbye to you. till tomorrow. all the best. hello greetings to all who are with us now. if you want peace, prepare for war as relevant as ever. so let's start with this topic , we fix the provocations of the ministry of defense of belarus reported that over the past 2 weeks belarusian servicemen have detained several people. a drone operator was also detained, who was trying to launch an aircraft on the territory of one of

the military units. in addition , several attempts to fly over a protected area were prevented by means of electronic warfare. i welcome our guests. andrei petrovich is what says that we will not have to relax and will not leave us alone. well, we are not relaxing, it should be noted that firstly, well, such cases, they regularly happen. uh, there are violations of really military objects of the territory protected. secondly, of course, it should be noted that when suppressing objects that are guarded by the armed forces, one must remember that this is always an act, well , violations of this may be followed after that as administrative or criminal liability. well, and most importantly, i would like to say that in any case, today you enter there, when you get to the territory of a military facility there, or completely different laws that are determined not just by some general rules established or

legislation, but in addition, there are charters for garrison guard services. mouths of the internal service, which give the right to the military to use weapons in case of disobedience or in the event of a clear attack on an object. this is what everyone should remember, you still think everyone has heard of this case of the a50 aircraft. when was the flight and terrorist act against this aircraft committed? we all see how the situation is developing in the south on our borders on the western borders of our country, the level of terrorist danger is really high and it was the military leadership that decided that all the guards should serve in full equipment with ammunition and related systems that allow, firstly, to organize surveillance and reconnaissance. second, monitor the situation. third. these units are like guards and outfits. they are reinforced by duty units and

units. they reacted quickly. well , we also have new tools. this electronic warfare electronic suppression correctly say these objects and that's it. this is also coordinated together not just by the military separate militia. a separate kgb everything. it works in a single system, so we have the ability to quickly open, detect and, uh, act accordingly. why were these five cases just presented, because they are already out of a row. out there appeared people who don't just engage in that pampering that's often the case. i spoke at the beginning of the cases. this is pampering. just the boys want to climb onto the object , something else well, there are different cases. and here the names of photos and video filming of military facilities are already involved in these cases. uh, the state security agencies are the police and i think that in the near future an important moment will be announced in moscow with a large-scale conference on international security , our minister of defense is speaking there. viktor fucking. i outlined several

fundamental positions of the republic of belarus very clearly. i will briefly dwell on two. although i do recommend listening to it carefully. in this dive will soon be adopted a new version of the concept of national security announced by the minister. that is, essentially. this means that we are moving with the times. that is, we react clearly to what is happening and once again sent the necessary signals to those who do not get it from the first second third time. we will do everything, the minister said, so that no one tries to tell the belarusians. how to live on our own land and added our army is ready to repulse anyone, then try to encroach on independence , sovereignty, territorial integrity and the constitutional system of the belarusian state and its allies is that we live in a peaceful country. it's not an accident, it's not luck. this is the painstaking work of the secret services of the president's state. otherwise, we would be in the mine side. didn't live. everything would have been destroyed.

if the war were already blazing, attempts to destabilize the situation in the country did not stop and the dreams of the west that belarus would be geopolitically turned away from russia and turned into an anti-russian springboard would not stop, but only for this we need them, these dreams have not gone away. they for many years they did everything for this to happen, this and coups d'etat, this is an attempt inside. country, and now also external influence and the minister of defense was extremely frank. he told the truth, if today belarus had not done everything for security over the years. it's not just tactical nuclear weapons. this is not only a joint russian grouping, it is also our army, which we have been strengthening over the course of all these years, the west would have attacked belarus a long time ago and we should never have any illusions. the west was not afraid to attack any country when they were sure of their victory the second moment. today is the moment. why did the minister of defense focus on

poland? poland is not an independent state today, today this country is extremely dependent on the united states of america and can without the knowledge of the polish people without asking. in fact, the poles do not want to fight, these are our neighbors to them. this is not necessary, they can be thrown into the furnace of war without asking, because everyone sees it. why there are more provocations on the border with belarus now. and look what happening in ukraine russia every day methodically continues to solve the assigned tasks in the west, you already grab your head. how to prolong the war? how to make sure that the victory of russia was not? eh, this is good, it is necessary to extend the war further, so there will be more provocations of terrorist attacks on the territory of belarus, there will be more destabilization of attempts, there will be more. especially by the twenty-fourth year before the elections and by the year 25, it is by no means interesting to relax while the west demonizes us with all its might. at least he tries, but we we see by the way delegations come to us, how we are developing relations in those countries that used to be called distant

arcs. today we understand that they are close to us, more than ever e cannot be demonized to the extent that they determined for themselves, nevertheless, against the backdrop of all the aggression that our neighbors, who oleg sergeevich said, here we are seeing poland ukraine baltic we are broadcasting the mood for constructive relations, the president commented on several points, meeting with the staff of the national airport, one of i propose to listen to the fragments now, and then we will definitely discuss it again, i emphasize that we are not going to fight with anyone. i'm telling you, this is all the time, therefore we are peaceful people. we want to cooperate with everyone. yes, now we live at the expense of , first of all, the east of russia, china to cooperate. well, do not forget to express the technological, the west, they are nearby. they are our neighbors the european union and relations with them should not be lost. we are ready for this, well, taking into account our own interests. believe me. the time will come. now such turbulence is on your

the language is spoken with great difficulties, but this is what we are in the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth year. i am sure there will be serious changes in the world, including how belarus has long gone beyond the assessment of bilateral relations, we and alexander grigoryevich confirmed this, because his speech was very concentrated and contained a lot of meanings in various directions, at least three and a conversation with the poles, because it was more about this, we specified the conversation, of course, there will be the belarusian people and the polish people spent too much financial effort and, in general, efforts in order to build a system of regional security and logistics and just give it all away for the sake of, for example, pis's ambitions , at the current stage it will not work poles people

are balanced pragmatic the president has repeatedly spoken about this will come the moment when it will be possible to conduct a dialogue with them not with the authorities, but we cannot speak. about poland we always talk about warsaw today. and one more very important point, the changes that we are waiting for and the president said on the 24th and 25th. eh, this is not something radically new. the new one is the unfolding of the processes that we are witnessing today and the president. marked a very important direction. this is economics and technology. well, our beloved political sphere, the weakest sphere is the political one, in our minds the binding to the elections of the united states of america is firmly entrenched, we are waiting for them and we are hoping for some result, but hegemon, the one that we created for ourselves, it is no longer there. no matter how much we talk about the fact that he rules poland poland rules itself to a much greater extent, so yes, here we are, everything is fine. sounds

absolutely. i would like, uh, really in poland they thought like that, how to say it, but the doo stands out and his mouth is not visible. here he sees that, relatively speaking , his neighbors in the east are ready to lend a hand. and they do not look like those who want normal good neighborly relations. well, now there is an election campaign going on, so the president will sharply change his rhetoric, by the way, speaking about this , he said that in the next month we cannot count on the fact that some conversation is a dialogue word, i would generally cancel it, because it is impossible, and conversation e after completion. uh, this campaign hysteria. it has definitely begun. it means that it no longer manages anything, because it is not an independent economy that has long belonged to them. this time, the second is all welfare. poland - this is money from america to fight russia and belarus what the president said, it means that europe will not go anywhere from us.

this is true europe will not go anywhere from us, and it will wake up. she is already waking up. she will become independent, sovereign, we want it. here is such an independent sovereign european union, and warsaw is planting. and what the president said. if only they broadcast it on european channels. 90% of europeans would say, do we want another? why lie? why are we told every day? what is belarus or russia or pmcs? wagner wants to attack us, yes, who needs you, by the way , when we talk about peace, is it that what lukashenka and belarus are doing is not aimed at peace. yes, even tactical nuclear weapons stands here for the world, if it is removed today the risks of attack are higher, and today there across the ocean they know today washington simply wrote the truth. if someday warsaw takes this idiotic decision to attack belarus, it will be destroyed in two blows. and it's true, that's why we do everything for the world. they are for the war. join our

conversation such a question. maybe, well, purely speculate, of course. and what are we to do here? we reason, looking at what's going on, the president said 24 25, and we know, but especially on the internet, well , fix it for alexander lukashenko. that he is a strong forecaster , he tries to listen to the forecasts that he gives. what do you think, what did alexander lukashenko mean? the fact is that yes, in fact, global alignments are determined around this period, because in fact, er, what he writes about. generally. today, the american press is good. there is an analytical press that biden did, in general , probably making a mistake by positioning ukraine as the struggle of the states for their hero, and everyone knew the answer to the question. what will happen if the states would win, but no one thought of answering the question. and what price will be the loss, because then the question arises. and why do we need nato after all, nato is that this is an organization that sells insurance for the sale

of security for the sale of guarantees there are thousands of members, such a terrible organization, it's crying 2% no one will attack you. yes, that is, this business is much more than anything else. but if nato does not provide a guarantee, and it turns out that it does not provide then the question. what is the money paid for? and what will it cost? how will the americans be able to keep their hero , figured out what exactly today we don't see, two trends one trend - this is where biden tries, as the game constantly doubles the stakes by throwing him that ever new new thing. it is clear that more is absolutely not sovereign. that is, he will say to go, there was a long-standing question. and who is more important, for example, in the same poland, coca-cola or the government is larger? her answer in favor of coca-cola is yes, because she controls the mass to a much greater extent, both in sensation and as a key owner of key assets. and so, one trend is, accordingly, the doubling of rates by the united states. the second trend that we see that is developing is the countries of the non-

western world, which are talking about, generally speaking, the order should be a little different. he must be fair. it must be non-manipulative. it should be, in general, quite interesting, acceptable to everyone, and in this regard, we see that the initiative of china for some reason turned away the initiative from latin america to the initiative of africa yes, that is, belarus yes, again advocated a constructive peace talk for regional security, which can be expanded, and we see that, in general, there is one approach from the west and very balanced approach from the side of the non-west. yes, where, in general, the world is watching. and what is actually more interesting and what where where actually? where is the truth, right? that is, who, in general, is trying to appropriate their own. narrow selfish goals because the hegemon - this is a very unpleasant situation. because once a hegemon you sit on top of a mountain and then you try to push those who gets closer to him, that it doesn’t matter who they are friends enemies allies not allies

, there is only a rigid hierarchy, and we are talking about another world about fair ones, belarus and i think that in the near future it will become more often than a blitz. i think that she will soon become a member of the show with and this is not the western world on other grounds of fair grounds, which are actually much more constructively interesting in slightly different senses. it needs individual meaning. where you can explore the moon and do not make transgender people. uh, unfortunately, if we return to the conversation. oh. poland, we extend our hand in warsaw , maybe not even to warsaw, but to those poles who want war there are many in poland who are ready to lend a hand in return. we do it not in vain, and at the level of society there will always be many such people, well, the system will always be. and it grinds them, that is, one can understand that society is extremely rarely subjective only at critical moments. i here remember, here often all lead. uh, the quote was about democracy, as she says that democracy this is the worst kind of government. if you take into

account everyone else, i then ask a question. what country was churchill talking about? britain is there anarchy, that is , there is no democracy there, but, it turns out, he was talking about democracy, as a type of colonial government, when powerfully quite normal is quite effective. in general, govern other countries. they will be sure that they themselves are quite confident to make a decision, that is, more in this regard is very understandable, managed by the country, managed on the basis of ownership of assets, and on the basis of a compromising information that is definitely on the leadership squeak, which is definitely on the er, leadership of the competing list. uh, the same civil consent, and in this regard. in general, there is no need for any illusions about management. we have our this step is more for the future. yes, this is an attempt to look at other elites, when other elites arise, they either arise in an explosive way. yes, either numbers second will decide that they can become numbers first. yes , it can be different at some point, when it turns out

that the course that it is is dangerous, it leads to bankruptcy, and it does not allow one more fragment on this subject to be reached. there will be an opportunity to continue. yes , please, and with the poles it is necessary to talk and instructed the prime minister to contact them, that if they want, let's talk. let's improve relations, we are neighbors, and neighbors do not choose. they are from god, well, they have october 15 to know the main parliamentary elections. and this is a parliamentary republic and, of course, they need to pump up now situation in order to, uh, show that they properly armed the country and rearmed, therefore, until october 15 , they are unlikely to make any significant changes that are beneficial to them and to us, they demand a lot from us and we cannot go for it permanently, because to contradict our interests. well, basically, it's poland that's escalating

the situation here, pushed with the west. not even with the west, the americans made a bet. e, to poland, but the poles are not stupid people - these are our people, they are slavs, they understand everything perfectly well, let's wait and see, but we open for cooperation. it's not weakness that we reach out anymore. this is not an attempt to solve all these problems, that we are afraid of something, afraid of attack, afraid of aggression. no, it's power. this is an understanding of what neighbors really are. we will not choose in any way, belarus as it stood here, it will remain so. poland must understand that in 100 years it is possible to build a wall , it is possible to build a dome around poland, because a wall from migrants cannot. x is the former twitter er, and wrote

the fourth question will touch the wall. do you support the elimination of barriers on the border by poland, the ruling party correctly said the president must prove that all its policies, which were so aggressive, that they are defending poland, and they are supposedly defending the entire european union , positioning themselves more as the saviors of europe from belarus and russia, they have to prove it, so the referee. well, uh, i would advise the polish sejm to bring another dome for consideration around poland because that the wall did not save the americans from the mexicans and will not save. what is a wall, how to escape from the haymarket migrants. this is pr. this is money. it's just theft. build a dome. but what should they understand? all the same , there is no getting away from us, and the president is right, he also says, why are they infuriated by the visa-free regime. after all, the easiest way is to stand belarus. sometimes i hear such conversations. let's close everything. everything, in general, we will stop any relationship, let no one in. this is a weakness. we show strength, thousands of poles come here a thousand lithuanians and power. the polish

minister is shaking with hatred. in fact. well , he said, we cannot prohibit lithuanians from traveling with propaganda. let's get licensing. this is their weakness. they get mad about it. they dream that belarus would leave all international organizations, so that we would not participate in the olympic games. and what kind of policy do we have for athletes, if an athlete. i am ready to act in such difficult conditions and win this is our strength, and not weakness and such a policy. we will continue andrey petrovich how are you looking at me? well, of course, a very interesting question is raised , there are only four of them, but among them is this fence, which they shot 5.5 meters in height, in fact, how interesting the question was raised by the builder. we built an expensive fence. where millions of zlotys have been invested. and now we propose to determine whether we need a referendum, well, in my opinion, the question will be obvious, the answer will be obvious to people. they are tried every day. as they say, to drag their

media into the confrontation between east and west, what is there on east. there, the evil of all evil gathered together, the russians, together with the belarusians, invited pmcs and are trying to, and even on the route with a nuclear baton, in addition, of course, how any pole will treat this today. well, what are we going to say? 93% support nato's actions. in poland, the population is what it means that every day they are dripping on their brains , it clearly shows where the good ones are, where the bad ones are, and yesterday the parade, which was held on august 15 , showed that in rhetoric it's anja. duda there is nothing absolutely peaceful everything everything is aimed at that, firstly, it is permeated with such russophobia and anti-soviet people, and everything indicates that we must protect the polish people, first of all, therefore we must arm ourselves. we need to attract even more loans. for all this and more. here the head of state correctly said

the year 24-25 is very important for us. they are important not to really show us how the alignment of forces has changed, no, the alignment of forces, the first thing we will see will be in the thirtieth year and after the thirties. you can see all the concept papers that are accepted the bloc of nato and the united states is what directs poland today, they are all charged precisely in bringing everything to 30. and they are clearly marked. who are opponents, who are friends, and practically every step of how they will act is spelled out, you just need to carefully look at these documents. they are in the open, what is in closed publications there in general, i think it’s even scary to imagine these issues, for example, in combat documents such as field manuals. there i will clearly find drawn organizational staff structures russian federation and the procedure for the use of nuclear weapons at these facilities and everything else, but what is the importance of the twenty-fourth twenty-fifth year. for us, this is an intermediate nearest. our task. these are elections in our country and

elections in the russian federation at this time, if we conduct the elections correctly and conduct the way the elections should be held in our opinion. they are according to the standards that europe is offering us today and to draw them in in every possible way, because for now we will live by these standards. we will never guess. what do they want from us, and twenty fourth twenty-fifth year. after that, we must clearly understand, can we create? a stable first political system a stable economic and military system of the third component. yes, you can talk about all nine areas without any doubt. they are important, but these are the three fundamental pillars on which we must first of all create a base that in the future will give us the opportunity to act specifically for our state. uh, on an equal footing in our region, and the fact that yes, the prospect is the sco. i think this is the closest perspective. everything is already understood by the prospect of brix without any doubt. eastern vector for us.

today, this is the most important thing that gives us support, that from which we can push off in order to then go back, unlike poland, unlike the west, we never went there with the crusades . you look at the poles, yes, they say that's right, they are slavs. they are ours today, we are already confronted with questions of genetics, and we see that we even have the same gene code there and for one. well, do not look at the expense of that they once separated by faith, right? in terms of culture, they became strangers to us, because they constantly came here with a cross in 2010, they saw some inside one state, but there they did not become our own. and today they will be between the hammer and the anvil all their lives. you understand this as right in the holy scripture. yes, what should be between what and what can be sinful in the west, they say about our emissions. you would be right to say that by their standards. here are smart diplomats not fools who impose sanctions, what do they say, and what have we done in belarus after all, before we had the opportunity of soft power through funds through the fifth deck through political parties that we funded public organizations

to somehow influence public opinion in belarus. we , with our aggressive policy, were carried out. look what belarusians are doing. they threw out all the possibilities of soft power from belarus and they are sitting to survive fools removed us from belarus altogether, so you correctly said the elections of the twenty-fourth year will be held according to our standard. let the standard forget. once and for all, only the belarusian people will decide. how to elect whom to elect, where to elect and no fifth column. i'm happy for the first time 24 years will pass without a fifth column for 30 years. we had a fifth column, but now it won't be, but it won't be. here on this let's energy, yin, let's add olgievna to our conversation. add i would pay attention to the referendum, because yes , there is also a lot of sense in it, except for the fence. here is this fence. uh, there is a precedent for the republic of belarus as an independent state mentioned in the referendum as

a separate issue. this is a debatable issue, of course. many will find different meanings. but i think that this is a precedent, and such a rather serious one, and it is unlikely that we will find it in the next stories, if we look close, and such an inclusion. i think that if polyakov had been told in 1920 that the republic of belarus would someday be included in a referendum, then, probably, it would have been from the category of some kind of fabulous. history, but today it is. i think that this is a positive result for us. a and. uh, when we are talking about the proposals of alexander grigovich, i would not say that we are extending our hand. i would say that we invite you to talk on an equal footing, because when we extend our hand, it means that our position is weaker, our position today is very strong and stable, these poles. they say, uh, practically. everyday that history needs to be written today, the poles have a great chance. and you need to write the history of the region today, including the worlds, but

belarus has already done it. step forward. we delayed for the first time also history here, period the countdown will start from us more late. but we are talking about poland now, we can keep in mind. and, of course, we understand ukraine, that when we talk about production with poland and the european union, we are aware of what should be set up there? peaceful track, huh? in this case, it still rests on well, on the same ukraine, we understand that it’s not zelensky that there are completely different people behind him, but on the one hand they are broadcasting their attitude in the form of the fact that this is some kind of zelensky’s peace plan in moscow perceived as a surrender plan for russia , which is unacceptable? the new york times asked peskov. he said that there is no basis for an agreement with kiev now and that moscow will continue a special military operation for the foreseeable future, and they are clarifying. that is, if russia plans to preside over the new territory of ukraine, peskov replies that no , we just want to control all the territories

that are currently registered in our constitution as ours, that is, we are in order to, let's say, wake up all these ties should deal with the situation in ukraine , it turns out like this ah. i think that the peace treaty peace talks today are impossible, because the spectrum of problematic issues that have been accumulating for decades. and it cannot be resolved overnight , including on the battlefield, but it will inevitably be stopped by a truce. and here, too , a platform will be developed in order to be able to go further. this is the transitional period. he will be very before you comment. i would like to briefly cite such a non-fact, perhaps from him will be convenient. even somewhere to push off to add additional colors, unfortunately, not bright to our conversation, in general. this is the desire of the zelensky team so that you do not start fighting to the last ukrainian. it hits the ukrainians better than any lancets, and

this is considered among the population as such a betrayal, an indicative question from grad c rese. what are you most afraid of asked the ukrainian soldiers in the trenches. so the main thing that 72% are not afraid of is that after the war the state simply cares about them, it turns out that most of the male population, which they are now fighting on the side of ukraine. they are afraid that people are on the bank account. if heroes are needed, then only posthumously so, but this is also directed to the emotional construction of ukraine if you look at the ukrainian game, and on the cult of heroes, this is still the cult of a dead hero, that is in order to become a hero, you need to die, that is, it turns out that the concept of the motherland is such a very pagan concept, and, moreover, it is completely non -christian. that is, you die, then you become heroes. this is the cult of the dead hero. this is what was built, in general, along with pagan cults of the last years, probably

8-10 quite actively, because in fact in poland we notice the same thing. this is very close to objective programming. but in my opinion, we said one of the previous programs that, in principle, a normal person comes from the three categories of the system. yes, that is, when there is, and good and evil is a measure that allows them to balance, and a person is manipulated and bent into two categories. his thinking stops and all thinking comes down to choosing this side, which is presented to him correctly, that is, one is presented white, the other is presented black, and then i will make the right choice. yes, that is, a person turns into an ant, and not into an independent creature. why is christianity in this plan? so important? yes, because the same three categories are the same christian trinity that makes you think, makes you stay human, as soon as there is a transition between two categories, there is a transition from faith to paganism. yes, that is, a very rigid manipulated thing that is happening now in love absolutely perfect plan. and this is absolutely not

accidental. this is also a solid plan. that is, on the one hand, brazilian such black jokes have already appeared, something like a man who exterminated almost all bandera in ukraine from this side. in general, it came up, but nevertheless, it turns out that yes, because ukraine, like poland, is a classic western model of governance. alliance with the elites at the expense of their own societies. so in this regard, the elites will be fine with them. he 'll be all right material in everything else, even with local residence. but their society will have to pay, and this is, in general, a system model that works successfully in the anglos, the nipple model fears for about 200 years, almost failures in such especially critical ones. if they were, then only in our territory. let's say this from the same october revolution and so on. here in this regard. unfortunately, everything is sad, yes , that is, here it will not go any differently,

if we talk about the course of hostilities about the same truce, and in fact, why peskov said about the territory, the territory is not at all included in the goals of the military campaign; the goals of the military campaign were announced by putin. this is genocification, where we are elitism and the neutral status of ukraine, as if they will not be achieved due to the fact that these conditions will be accepted by the ukrainian leadership, for god's sake, war at this moment it becomes as if they were not achieved due to the military victory, for this russia will have to capture most of the territory of ukraine at least the whole of ukraine also the second option, that is, in any case , these three principles, they remain inevitable, and thus they will reach the tenth question. that is, the territory is not. in general, some kind of goal here is achievement. here are these three principles, and the territory is a means with an instrument of achievement. that's the goal that's hurtful in all that, when we hear the statement now. here is literally the leadership of ukraine that they are not ready not only for some kind of negotiations, but to talk on the terms of any russia, they will not immediately understand that

the negotiations will not be between ukraine and russia and the negotiations will be only between the united states of america and russia, this is the tragedy of the ukrainian people, that they do not solve anything. in general, i don’t want to say anything, that i think there will still be several million veterans. yes, and the main part will be those who did not fight, in general, did not come close to the front. but this, in principle, is how everything is arranged in ukraine now. and the armed conflict itself is only what it is fraught with so that well, let's talk objectively. this is fraught with the fact that inside this states will continue to heat up. uh, well, civil strife, the split will definitely not be an enemy, again ukraine will be divided into the west and the east, you understand, well, there will also appear, and obviously , this neo-nazi movement, which is now progressing there in the literal sense of the word. as for the armed conflict in ukraine itself, i think that it will last for more than one year. nobody benefits. today, none of the other

parties are negotiating, because there are no points of contact on which they can be conducted ukraine today once again needs to be understood, if it is more a dependent state, where and what they say to do, then ukraine today has become simply a territory on which an armed conflict is being played out between the two sides, it can be the first such proxy, a serious conf. between west and east, and we see so far the russian federation is actually alone . yes, they are fighting against, well, 50 countries of the west are fighting quite successfully. the russian federation is a very strong state on it has a huge, both military and human potential. well, look, she finds it necessary to call there only 300.000 from to mobilize 300.000 people. she believes that at the moment these forces are sufficient to introduce defensive actions. now imagine the military potential that we could remember there since the great patriotic war or something else, how quickly this conflict could end. well , once again i say that the question is imperfectly not raised

in ukraine as a state, but the question is worth those interests of global interests that were said before the start of the special military operation and were voiced. she said in ukraine knew what you are saying that russia only mobilized 30,000 people. even in ukraine, people understand. she says, listen if russia wants to. she will bomb everything here, why do they only bomb warehouses. why are aircraft factories bombed, because nato is waging a war against russia in relation to the war, and russia is conducting a special military operation about belarus and the poles let them remember the polish leadership with them a special there will be no military operations, they will simply be wiped off the face of the earth. yes, and god, so as not to carry out a walkie-talkie in poland, then it will be carried out in the next 2-3 years of sand, the poles will not translate in a couple of minutes we will continue the conversation. stay with us. we continue africa nigga. she, especially for narrow

specialists, will also say a neger, but since she sees from him the french colonial spirit. still niger for reference, both pronunciations are acceptable. so the tension remains on the one hand the position of the niger authorities. and those who are ready to support a neighbor could on the other hand promoters of interests in paris and washington on the continent. uh, it will come to the great war, but for now the turks are going on, and it’s quite interesting, because we see that it’s there if it’s, well, here, which really demonstrated here, that adults will lead the conversation, yes, that is, macron not needed, an adult immediately came to decide, but you adults also did not decide anything further on those leaks that exist in the states, for example, it will absolutely suit the observance of american interests while completely throwing out the french. here too to issues of allied relations leaks that are. and the option of a serious conflict , provided that not all african countries are ready to fight, there are nigers, so that

sufficiently large armed forces are ready to fight there. that's while she also took the position of bargaining. and what do you pay us what you give, that is , the president on the one hand of nigeria , but appealed to his parliament to send troops there to the parliament - he blocked this decision, that is, the position of bargaining is indicated, make your bets. well, for now, here it is situation. who? what bets will he make, because even the question arises, can there be a compromise option when france will remain without uranium, europe will remain without damage, but the united states will remain with its assets, which are quite important, that is, the states, for example, are absolutely satisfied with this option. it would have fixed the colonial status of europe, yes, that is, you are there in terms of, it’s not if the scientific options for development, but the military option, in which, say, the same wagner will enter. in a nigga and in general, she a nigga will join four to other countries, where wagner is generally present, her presence is quite

active, also not an excluded option ; moreover, these options can be combined , taking into account that the united states, as a rule, is still given by its broadcasting. that is, it can start from the first option, then naturally flow into the second, and at the same time, a large-scale conflict is somehow not very hard to believe today. for the simple reason that france does not have the resources for this, the united states and the resources for this are not. and the presence russia, china, uh, in africa is quite serious, that is, here the question arises further that all the west was preparing for two clashes. these are ukraine and taiwan but africa was not included in the plans at all and to carve out resources for the conflict. in africa , it is possible only through the first and second, and there are strategic things, that is, in this regard. uh, nigga. it may well slip through this peaceful option. when national interests are realized, when control over the national resource is so, except for uranus there

is by and large, there is nothing now, but they are trying. here they said about the mirny track, uh, they are considering an option. that is, as long as it goes. as you said , the new niger leadership is trying to raise stakes, trying to introduce its own diplomatic track. here is the new leader of niger, the head of the national council for the salvation of the motherland, general abdurakhman, and a little earlier , the central committee announced that you were ready for negotiations. this is the first. secondly. he indicated that the desire to resolve the problems that arose before the country exclusively by peaceful means. this one, by the way, is orthodox i wanted that, which is also very important, i wanted to say two interesting things. here 's a hold on uranus. and the europeans are used to being tilted. they will be happy to buy americans for this. uranium is also being bought by naftogaz now and you say that you have strengthened your independence and sovereignty, then for people the second moment. see how americans spend. chaotic politics, but for the whole european union they tell. you must defend your principles as soon as

these events began. we have the same as if in a coup d'état is taking place in the country, if these people support the russian federation , these are bandits, if they, uh, made state transfers , they said, we will fight russia, the whole european world and in the usa they said the democrats came to power. they need to be supported, finally, the example of myanmar well, what is happening there, for the sake of democracy, hundreds of officials are being destroyed, terrorist attacks are being killed, the americans are silent applauding everything is fine. but there is one more moment arrived, when the americans come to the negotiations, they come out in sentences. we are ready to recognize the regime where principles are the first, and, the second. i would like to return to the moscow conference on security, which was there the situation in nigeria was considered and there is one trend that must be understood against the backdrop of the events that are taking place in ukraine against the background of the success of the russian federation. the fact that russia has become independent, these are the trends in africa they will continue. after all, the whole world is looking

at russia. they understand that nato was not so omnipotent. the only thing i disagree with you. this is what i think is just such a big war for africa us all will wait for africa nobody will give. everyone understands very well that africa is now strategically an element of the future for europe for the united states . but let's gather me again. olga grina is the most likely, yes, yes, but here again the question is. i will not take the resource argument that your argument is that africa alone will not leave africa like this . yes, africa, after the end of the bipolar confrontation, began to live relatively, the west is 14 times worse. yes, so, that is, there are questions about what this confrontation was, if there was no ukraine, then, probably, we would see a completely different scenario in africa and e. taiwan would not then have served as some kind of barrier to the implementation of such an armed scenario, but niger is

already the fourth. yes, but the nigers are already the fourth episode in africa and this is how it acts, today, the united states and the resources are constantly my colleagues, e, just in favor of my thesis that negotiations in ukraine will be because there will be, because e, the exhaustibility of resources was recorded by all participants in today's discussions. uh, and the united states can't scatter today all over the world. here is a situation that just shows it. and as for, and the struggle for interests? yes, of course, uh, both the united states and europe have africa in mind but haven't kept it for a very long time. but there is a radical change in the situation. unfortunately, they cannot, if they did not have such resources, then china would not be able to gain a foothold. in africa, in order for this to cause such a heated discussion and anxiety in the early twenties, that is, they

have already missed africa, so you are today's scenario , such an armed russian experts i join in the majority and foreign countries do not consider such an increase in conflict and an armed scenario. but this is good for our region as well. this is a kind of new model being built. we may not see it yet, but i think these are the events of the week. this is a certain element in what will happen in our region, a military man, as you see, it will come to such a large-scale clash that will change the balance of power in the world. well, firstly, i would like to say here it was very correctly noted that the roots go. well, absolutely africa is, as it were, a consequence of the policies that are taking place. you look at the beginning in europe they began to land a little on germany, this is the first european economy, so that, as they say, it will stop politically and economically influencing these events that are taking place around in order to weaken

the european union, the second kit on which europe stands . france and france today is, in fact, one colonial power, probably the last one left. it has and in south africa yes, and french guiana. she also has polynesia. it has the southern french islands of its territory, the southern one is the island of kergillen. all the rest. that is , in essence, today they put france. uh, she started, as they say in chess, any next move will be a conflict there will not be a conflict. in any case, it will be directed against france. well, imagine there, how many different structures are involved. we don't take. this is the african union as a whole, which, as it were, is more of a deliberative organ. although he has his own military structures there. but they are bogged down in zombies everywhere and it is unlikely that today the african union will use its armed units there, the ecowas organization, which is promoted as an economic, well,

first of all, it has very serious military forces. well, how seriously, according to the latest data, they have already collected, supposedly about. 25,000, of course, nigeria is headed by this powerful state. she alone there, in principle, managed, there are about 160,000. he has an armed forces of only about 100,000 him ground forces. but if in this situation evaz really enters and returns e, muhammad abazuma back to his place, then it is unlikely that they will give this france the opportunity to use these bowels again, which have for sure, there will be some other other force that will already be on other grounds to transfer this uranus well, what to hide uranus, france buys from a niger for 12 dollars, and sells for 1808. can you imagine what kind of colonialism there really is, because what distinguished those colonies that were still, when just

otklonilizm from her about nezmy before the metropolis was responsible for what happens in the colony, and now the metropolis and she doesn’t give a damn who cuts whom, who kills and who does it, in general and most importantly, pump out all the resources from there to get the maximum profit. and today these countries have really rebelled against all this inside this africa so these conflicts do not stop. you just think whether the army will collide or not. yes, there, if you look at more than 100 nationalities of nationalities, there is and everything, everything that is mixed there only already you say that there is arab africa, black africa, and so on, white africa, yes, where is there, and so on. that is, this colored colored continent itself, but it is torn apart everywhere , there you can, all the more so, see the development of all mankind conditionally, you can say in the same nigerim you can see, starting from cannibalism and ending with socialism. understand all these elements. here is the system of human development to say that there will be an armed conflict. i think that most likely everything is going to this, because that we need a serious redistribution of the world, we will redo

the world, without military conflicts without military conflicts. not only the military conflict is not like that. do you think, do you think the american troops landed no alarm, as usual, as they do, they are in the middle east. that's when we say you are right. say how many ethnic conflicts there are in africa, and who finances them? and whoever does that the traveling on constantly continued so this is the essence of western policy to play off, and arm, and then support one side, then the other cut each other. they reconciled them, they took the assets, the sunnis, the shiites are fighting , because of which who pits them, in addition to these religious issues, americans hate when sunnis and shiites live in peace. they are these negotiations that have taken place between them for them. it was a tragedy, they need africa to constantly blaze. so they did the same with ukraine. they would do the same with belarus. here they would need a civil war sergeyevich, they need a civil war. what was thinking about this, by the way, with what we said about europe

is happening in africa and perhaps now we can draw some main conclusions from what was said today. look at the international anti-fascist congress. here, in general, it is surprising, and such a verdict to our time, that in the xxi century , instead of the whole world there to explore new planets. ah, it’s right to evolve to develop technologies, that is, we are again and again forced to face this social ugliness called fascism, which is not just some kind of degeneration. here, of course, evolutionary, but an artificial tool that he plans to use. here's how to get to that point. we thought that in the 20th century, our grandfathers finally finished it off. for the last 400-5 years, when anglo-saxon e, imperialism has been developing. let 's not forget that every 6 days this will not be a country celebrating its

independence day from great britain. that is, it was a global empire with global management tools and know-how, well again i’ll say that the last bright nohab was developed back in the middle of the nineteenth century, when britain understood how to manage, and manage it through cognitive programming. uh, flashing brains when some concept is abandoned. and you already know what the result is. he will come in 10 years. that is, here is the brilliant knowledge that the british received. basically, random. this is a separate issue. somehow it turned out you are leading to the fact that the international anti-fascist congress. one can even specify the international anti- anglo-saxon the fact is that in fact. this is what it is, this is our theory of exclusivity, when you consider yourself a subject, and the rest of the world an object, but sorry, it originated in britain somewhere else in the seventeenth century. that is, when britain teaches the opposition that it has its own world, when

british conservatism arose, then that this is its own world, where the rule operates, and the outside world is where you have the rules, maybe not to apply this object. that is, in this regard , i will remind one philosopher who spoke about german fascism. he says that the germans, what they made it clear, that the british always meant that the british in this regard, in fact, proceeded from this , the whole british empire that there are still first-class people, that is, well, first the turn is the aristocrats, yes, which means there are about 1,000 years of history, which appeared there at one time the wilhelms the conquerors. and it's a white heap, hasn't gone anywhere. she controls the situation and eats everyone else. that is, fascism is always the positioning of what is the chosen ones are those who can be considered, and not people, and this paradigm and it is so convenient that it’s like every time this is forgotten, when it is forgotten, in principle. in one format or another, it will all arise, that is, the question. uh, not only in

the need to eliminate fascism. yes , but you need to approach its origins from the other side, and to the one who allows himself to consider himself exclusively a creation in the world, and treat the rest as objects. yes, i think that the anti-fascist congresses in the republic belarus this is another second one - it's not a fight. with something new, not about fascism , neo-nazism. uh, it's a question of memory. you see, we must always remember. i think this is not the last one they should be held every year. and we do not choose neighbors alexander grigoryevich said, well, we must remember that people living next to you are peoples who initiated two world wars. we are all obsessed with world war ii. it is, as it were , more than a memory, but two wars have passed through the republic of belarus and no one has yet did not answer the question, what was it? what prompted them, uh, to use such means

in the center of europe, which today looks super-democratic, which dictates some conditions to us, but we remember their past and the congress is the memory of those who died. we have in the republic of belarus in the russian federation and in general in the post-soviet space. and this is a reminder to them of what they were, because they already forget their history a little. but we cannot forget it, so this is the natural course of things for us. this is not a fight with something new. this is a reminder of what was that will never go away, indeed , it will always remain someone above someone below and democratic principles. that is, that's all that universal, er, canvas, which we are offered today. it has completely turned into a weapon. democracy is a weapon of human rights. this weapon is the rule of law. this is a weapon. we are an anti-fascist congress - this is still a struggle. and with this , you want to know all the interesting things. remember the immortal film such seventeen moments

of spring and the dialogue between muller and stirlitz and when müller spoke about the gold of the party and about the contribution to the future. he uttered very such interesting words about what if somewhere ever instead of words. hello. you will hear the word heil in relation to any individual, then you should know there they are waiting for us from there. we will begin our great revival. look how real these prophesying words are. today they work in the same europe, look at what is happening today in ukraine, look at what is happening everywhere in all countries. same thing for latvia the most important thing to say about the fact that at the beginning there is always a black clear form, as nazism is born today. yes, it has roots there from the end of the 19th to the beginning of the 20th century. well, look how it takes roots at the beginning, anti-sovietism is sure to go. russophobia and then nazism

, you always unequivocally understand these three actions following each other. why today young people are again beginning to perceive this nazi concept in its essence, because your people are offering it and saying it. he towers over all other people. you are not like everyone else, you understand this law here aryans and in the fact that everyone else is under you, it seems to elevate a person above himself, and when, on the contrary, internationalism is presented. all people are equal independence of the skin and everything else is really needed here. these are human prices. nasty himself absorbs well, the same thing. what role does the church play today ? the same church, it becomes, how can we talk about the conceptualization of patriarchy as the basis for the creation of sectarianism instead of orthodox churches on the territory of ukraine, and there today everyone zigs in the order of things is that the nazis in fact.

again they begin to march across our europe, and here the head of state said very correct words, while we go and take our children to khatyn to the brest fortress, while we visit, believe that fascism will never come here, and we will have a historical memory. and and we have something to remember, we have something to oppose 2 minutes literally we have left. yes, fascism was a tool and it will be necessary to tell the truth today. he raised his head again to the torchlight procession, again they kill for the fact that you speak russian again they kill for nationality. but there is one plus. they wanted to isolate us. they wanted us to become outcasts, and today the whole world is uniting around belarus and russia , what was in moscow, what will be minsk how many countries come here, because our cause is just and we will win, like our food, and fascisms have destroyed another way no. yes, i just wanted to add parts of the good definition that

fascism is appropriating the right to rob another due to the fact that it is not like you and this is just the same absolutely unacceptable thing, because the world must be established on other principles on the principles of fairness justice in relation to all. as a matter of fact, on what we also stand. thank you very much fixed me, in my opinion, a good conversation. got it today. i thank our participants for today everything. belarus is endless forests , blue rivers and lakes, pristine nature, from which it is impossible to take your eyes off. and belarus is also about people. and we open them for you fate, we carry traditions through a generation, at

the same time we change our views on familiar things. all this makes the world a better place. we tell you about different people, but they are united by one love for belarus belarus 24

ready for an exciting adventure through the cities of belarus welcome cozy places and medieval buildings. if you look closely, you will see traces of the fingers of the master, they say that thanks to this unique technique, part of the glacier managed to survive the old estates and majestic cathedrals for orthodox architecture. they were going to.