companies, according to the developers of the amendment , will also contribute to reducing the number of offenses. our correspondent ilona volynets studied the documents and will tell you all the details. unfortunately, we don't have a clear understanding right now. who is responsible for what. we have such a built structure. uh, she seems to be understandable there is a passenger there is a dispatcher. basically, the passenger addresses the dispatcher. yes, the dispatcher sends the car, but we actually have this link. the car carrier, which should monitor how the car pulls out onto the line. in what state it is actually absent, so the situation in the field of transportation is seen by the representative of the initiative group for the protection of the rights of taxi drivers. the author of the telegram channel is dmitry bogan. in support of his words , he offers to take a ride to the nearest shopping center and see what taxi cars are waiting for passengers. say you car

taxi. well, no, really, no, for sure. well, let's wait. maybe you will get an order. here is an example, look. this comrade is written ip beetle, but actually sits behind the driver is a person, not a russian. this is clearly not russian at all. he even talks. the emphasis here is a great confidence that the carrier in the application will not be a bug at all, but some other company will be in the application. that is, what is written on the board - this does not mean anything, we cannot condemn anyone. and even more so to blame everyone earns as best they can, but our interlocutor continues the problem in another, it’s too easy to become a driver today. taxi man opens the internet. i'm not even talking about chats the internet opens up to him, a job in a taxi jumps out. he presses the button. yes, i want to work with a taxi, they tell him, please come to me. uh, if you work on your car, please send me a driver’s license and, uh, the passport for the car, within 10 minutes, this

comrade is connected, uh, respectively, to the system and he passes photo control on a car that has absolutely nothing, otherwise it turns out nothing control. this year, 177 subjects were caught in non-payment of taxes to the administrative. responsibility attracted more than 670 fizlit confiscated illegally obtained income in the amount of about a million rubles, the taxi industry is associated with the acceptance of cash, respectively , the typical violations are the acceptance of cash, and in violation of the established procedure. well, as a result, the concealment of proceeds , and the payment of wages in envelopes , is the implementation of illegal business activities, but one cannot but say that we are establishing more secure schemes. such line of business personnel, or manipulation with the procedure and organization of the market. taxi waiting changes in the country completed public discussion of the draft of the new decree the key innovation is the creation of a registry, road transportation

of passengers. where everyone who works in this area, the taxi fleet and dispatchers should be included. drivers. each vehicle will be included in the register for a fee, and this immediately caused indignation, they say, all expenses, of course, will be borne by passengers for the cost of those services that are provided for by the register, and these are state fees for entering information into the register, as well as changes according to that information. non-essential, uh the amount of the fee and make up e-e, for example, for entering information on the transport of the vehicle, two base values; entering information on the driver of the road carrier, one base amount, given that today the road carrier e. also, the driver will be able to cover these costs almost in a day of his work. we do not see any circumstances under which the e -draft decree may have an impact on the cost of transportation, foreign companies, for which there are many complaints , will be able to work only through a legal entity created in belarus dispatcher. and the services should use exclusively belarusian information

resources. the rules of the road are the same for everyone, as well as the norms of the belarusian legislation. so today i worked on the screen, let's say, yes, 12 hours or 8 hours there, well, a state-owned company that strictly regulates working hours, and then went to work at night, and a taxi driver, not there, not there, this work will not. dangerously understand, because the mode of work and rest. yes, i may not quite agree with his rules and regulations, but he all the same, it should be, and what is it, when the twelfth hour working day for 16 hours is encouraged, when they sit it all becomes a bomb for slow action, passengers dispatcher driver. this chain works flawlessly when everyone follows the rules, and does not try to slip through a red light. ilona-volonets maxim lvov area of ​​interest. and on this today, all the information about the most noticeable in the economy, we will tell in the field of interests tomorrow. i remind you that we are on the air every tuesday, wednesday

and thursday, summer mood and success to you all endeavors. naimani doesn't want to miss the run and bug the berries and the rain. shpotet leaves, sun shines , berries, our life is formed. i would like to have a closer look at this world. and every day to discover something new she is in it so. 'cause we cut it out with love. with love to belarus my name is igor

this is my propaganda let's start. the main event of the past week. i'm sure it's obvious to everyone that alexander lukashenko gave an interview to ukrainian journalist blogger diana panchenko. she was promised 2 years ago during a big conversation about the real leader keeps his word with regards to the figure. they want panchenko, it would be more accurate to say people, despite the fact that she is from ukraine, for example, being, among other things, acquaintances with diana, i personally do not consider her not about russian, not about putin's diana panchenko in my opinion. very much about the ukrainian journalist, but against zelensky against the government that now leads her native ukraine is no longer in the abyss of destruction against the puppetry of kiev and against the puppeteers in the face of the united states this definitely does not oblige she unconditionally supports every decision of the kremlin on ukraine, and it’s definitely

difficult for her to tell how ukrainian is enthusiastic. infantry of the russian army at the front, because with all the guilt of the kiev regime, its fellow citizens are dying. i am a panchenko girl , to put it mildly, not stupid, but any intelligent person and it doesn’t matter at all. from which side of the conflict he is and what views he holds , he will not deny that specifically alexander lukashenko has been out of his skin for many years, out of the woods and climbs so that there is no war on the territory of ukraine, nowhere else among the slavs for 2 hours of interview questions were mainly about their own about putin about zelensky , that is, about the war, but the peculiarity of this particular conversation was the sincerity and emotionality of the president’s answers and the fact that panchenko tried and managed to show lukashenka not only as a president, but also as a person , every true leader is grateful for this colleague - this is a person, and the highest position in any state is not strictly a profession that equalizes each elected president remain people and every strong power relies, among other things, on the human qualities of its leader. this applies to

how alexander grigorievich is. vladimir vladimirovich, their human relations play a crucial role for the two countries and for the whole region, when putin first told you that he plans to start his own. well, you saw the performance on tv. i am also the first. uh, we never had conversations. right on the eve of hostilities, that the war will begin? the only thing in a few days or there in a day? i do not remember. we met with him at his country residence and discussed the situation that had developed, he did not say verbatim for the first time , i also tell you about it, he tells me, listen, sash, you know this situation, if god forbid what happens, well, we are an ally, of course, allies . if suddenly something happens. uh, what could happen? well, whatever, maybe you. cover me, please. and in the first days of e in a special

military operation, if you remember, i made a statement that we are not getting involved, this conflict, we can do little to help russia and so he can deal with anyone, but we will not allow the russians to shoot the back. lukashenka many times, he says, russia will cope with anyone, and every time skeptics try to prick alexander grigoryevich silently. what then is the war in ukraine going on for so long once again. i repeat the banal thought of war - this is when it is clear from front to front, when all available human resources are thrown into battle, and the enemy is non -stop being beaten from all guns. and i’ll also say it very cynically, but it seems that the war is true, when civilians are sincerely sorry, but on war, as in a war, their potential death, significantly, does not affect the course of the war in ukraine, russia has not waged and is not waging a war in this way, although in an interview the president will say that russia has essentially fulfilled the goals of a special military operation and ukraine will never be that aggressively nationalistic that in

relation to moscow, in any case, it will be, if it is much more careful, then what happens. there you know for several months. i personally have racks of parallel between today's hostilities with armed conflict that putin had to resolve in his first month of coming to power. i'm talking about the second chechen war, which is already called so today. but then it was moscow that called the counter-terrorist operation. maybe i'm wrong, but today's own in ukraine and the one who is in chechnya have a lot in common. from what, what began to happen in grozny after the withdrawal of the russian contingent is of great importance for the realization that what will happen after its own with ukraine is quite obvious that moscow did not want, did not want, it will never want the exit of kyiv and the zone of its influence. it can be worse than this, only the complete transition of kiev into the zone of influence of russia’s direct opponent, the united states , does this mean that the russian president wants to seize ukraine or include it in his country, as for me, no. so, quite once i draw parallels with the second

chechen war, it’s still young in grozny. putin did not wave his saber, but completely compromised himself, appointing the head of the republic not conditional ivan ivanov akhmat kadyrov, that is, his goal was precisely a compromise, although he completely had all the tools for the complete subjugation of the territory. it is difficult for chechnya to manage the federation, because it is necessary to keep a reasonable level of federalism in jewelry, the same applies to countries that are part of moscow’s zone of influence. take care of it here, it’s definitely superfluous, so talking about what he wants to absorb, then ukraine, belarus, then who else they are idiotic, because everything works completely wrong, but if putin has imperial ambitions, alexander lukashenko said, as it is, that there are some imperial manners. i didn't see it, but i think that the heads of large states always burst their chests. i'm really the way a person can think. uh, this also applies to well , in the united states of america what is wrong

russia is a huge empire what can i say, of course, this leaves its mark on the character of a person. i am categorically proud of the fact that i work alongside a leader who has both the strength and the will to say it the way it is. i will allow myself to supplement alexander grigorievich with my own fabrications. any superpower, by definition, has imperial ambitions. that's the whole point of it existence and only such a model of foreign policy. it is possible for hegemons to aggressively defend their zones of influence, which is not the same as territory. and yes, aggressively trying to involve more and more new countries in its zone of influence, which is completely different from including new territories in its composition, this is what russia is doing, this is being done in the usa and china. greater degree. turkey is doing it now. why are you trying to do it? even more all world politics the distance of different imperial ambitions was built. if suddenly the imperial ambitions of a superpower are abandoned, it ceases to be

a superpower, and then it completely disintegrates, an example of this by itself, the soviet union let me fantasize. now, if we imagine that the russian federation will successfully realize its imperial ambitions, including more and more countries in its zone of influence. once upon a time, the country will end correctly hypothetically, as soon as the entire planet is in the zone of influence of the russian federation, then russia will immediately cease to be hegemon, not being able to realize his political aggression of the behemoth, because there are no those left to whom this aggression can be directed and this will immediately lead to the disintegration of russia, because every hegemon that ceases to gigabanize the concept of enslaving the whole world is deliberately disintegrating, wrong because in the case success leads to self-destruction of the enslaver. but on this path he timidly entered the washingtons. now we see the consequences for them. the american empire is falling apart and the view of the collapse of the united states to you . this thought will seem bold, but this is not about the coming years, but about a decade, putin

is a man who is definitely categorically smart, cunning and at the same time trained, but he is also a man. i can't say there in detail. uh, but what he's going through. uh, in connection with these events, the situation. not easy, like a person absolutely adequate, experienced, who really analyzes, tries to look ahead , calculates his life, he was such a person, consider a military man, and he had a life and work where it was necessary to calculate a lot in advance. he really calculates, but he i’m never sure, i never calculated that it’s necessary to enslave someone there, then ukraine , then belarus, that something is nonsense, you know, i have recently had my free time. i'm trying to study history. i have my own view of the man putin because his fate, which shaped him. character and life value still strongly influence the whole world, including belarus, for me the cornerstone of his biography is

my year of birth 1989 by that time, as vladimir himself said in an interview vladimirovich in moscow already ignored all the warnings and reports from east germany, which was written from there by a kgb lieutenant colonel with an operational pseudonym platov , because in moscow they were busy with some kind of internal intrigues and when in the gdr, after the fall of the berlin wall, both soviet civilians and soviet military were in danger and the entire soviet, german intelligence network, both eastern and western, that is, dresden , which was in the zone of influence. the union called moscow for help, putin himself called, but moscow was silent, i will quote a russian president, it became clear that the union was sick. and this deadly, incurable disease called paralysis, paralysis of power, a paralyzed and dying hegemon, left the country of his zone of influence to the mercy of fate. that is, he left in trouble. for a kgb officer to leave his country for his own, this is the height of dishonor, after 2 years putin will submit a letter of resignation.

it seems to me that those events in the life of the russian leader have a very strong influence on the foreign policy of russia under putin. russia does not try to involve so many countries in its zone of influence so as not to be able to guarantee them support in any situation, so that some other intelligence officer does not call from conditional damascus to moscow a. moscow would not respond without being able to come to the rescue. imperial ambitions are thus limited by putin's enduring human desire to be in charge of countries. partners. ukraine as a state and zones of influence to moscow has long since left, but part of the territory of ukraine remained in the zone of influence of moscow and this is the donbass situation in ukraine - this is not imperial ambition. the responsibility of a man and an officer of putin for those people whom moscow promised not to leave in trouble, not to give up other methods. they were not, except for the introduction of troops, and he could not leave his own . lukashenka said that putin was worried. for all the events, i am sure that this is how it is , perhaps this war would not have happened, if another, vladimir, had also experienced it. here is my first

conversation when zelensky spoke on the phone the first days of the war. we talked with him for a long time, he was dusting there, he was dusting something. i say, you know, we all would not argue on the phone, but remember the war in your state. not today tomorrow with you they will ask why your nations are going on your land to understand the situation it is worth adding that another vladimir is already inside russia of course there are those who criticize him for the death of people in ukraine, but there would be even more critics if people died on the territory it would turn out that russia was no longer given a third option, and had it not started with a war in his country, he would have been responsible for this, and this dramatically increases the likelihood of the biggest problem. both for russia and for any post-soviet country , it is customary to say that there are two troubles in russia. this fools are expensive in politics. i think the next two main troubles in russia are the lack of a strong government. and even worse two authorities. and now in my opinion. the main fragment

of lukashenka's interview i saw everything that was happening was related to these events. everything started. unfortunately , there is a war with leonid danilovich. it would start if poroshenko and not zelensky were the president . you know, uh. here i often criticize volodya zelensky. yes, it's not experience. this is some kind of expressive character , you know what he has always been doing. it played their role, but troubles. i didn’t say in vain, they started, that if they were danilovich. when there was no definite course, we will do it here and there, and i remember how, uh, the big referendums of the constitution led uh, we met. hey, we're sitting together. eh, laziness further began to say something about ukraine and yeltsin listen. well, help. you give him

a normal constitution to hold a referendum. i say, seriously, i'm ready to connect this discord. uh, as it is now in ukraine or then it would not have happened. well, time went by damn, no did in fact the constitution is ready actually adopted. yes, he is popular with another meeting. i'm talking about yeltsin. well, he doesn’t want to do anything there according to this constitution. and he says that the rada will not approve this institution. that's where it all started kushma then, uh, yushchenko , then yanukovych, all uh, everything, it accumulated and on an inexperienced, absolutely non-politician person. well, zelensky’s novolud is alien to this policy, everything fell down there. why did the soviet union collapse because the problem of the lack of a strong government immediately appeared, and then

and the problem is worse, that is, dual power, when there were two legitimate presidents in moscow. gorbachev as the head of the ussr and yeltsin as the head of the russian federation. today, just the day when the august 1991 ended , as a result of which the apparent problem, the two powers in russia were resolved, then yeltsin and those who stood behind him began to solve these problems of the lack of strong power. all. again, it led to two governments with parliament and events for 93 years already and shooting from tanks. the white house, now all events are evaluated differently, like the figure, to be more precise bo personality. nikolaevich but the main thing that he and they sought was the absence of dual power and the establishment of a single strong government in the country. only in this way can our countries develop effectively. what is really there, the young president lukashenko in the ninety-fifth, he solved exactly the same problem, the elimination of two authorities in belarus, so that the country would not be mired in the confrontation between the head of state and the supreme council, then alexander grigorievich set about eliminating the problem of the lack of strong power in the country and he shot her strong and