authorities, and then a worse problem, that is , dual power, when there were two legitimate presidents in moscow. gorbachev as the head of the ussr and yeltsin's head of the rsfsr today is just the day when the august coup ended in 1991, as a result of which the apparent problem, the two authorities in russia were resolved, then yeltsin and those who stood behind him began to solve these problems of the lack of a strong authorities. all. again it led to two governments with parliament and an event for 93 years and shooting from tanks. the white house, now all events are evaluated differently, as well as the figure. more precisely, the personality of boris nikolaevich. but the main thing that he and they sought was the absence of two powers and the establishment of a single strong power in the country. only in this way can our countries develop effectively. what is really there, the young president lukashenko in the ninety-fifth, he solved exactly the same problem, the elimination of two authorities in belarus, so that the country would not be mired in the confrontation between the head of state and the supreme council, then alexander grigoryevich set about eliminating the problem of the lack of strong power in the country and he was strong shot.

and in my opinion, now lukashenko is trying to insure the country from precisely these two main troubles - the lack of power, and even worse than the dual power in the nineties . no one from the post-soviet countries had a clue, what to do with democracy that suddenly fell on its head . it's just that they gave power to a third party in poland, with all the talk about democracy, they were able to build a cost to recognize the power as strong and dictatorial. is it true. this is the strong power of the americans in poland and not polyakov nazarbayev also established strong power in kazakhstan. aliyev established strong power in azerbaijan, strong power was and in some other union republics, and in others, there was either the absence of strong power, then there were two powers in general. this is georgia’s armenia and, of course, this is ukraine in any management model, that a team, an enterprise , that a country should always be one person or one force that makes the final decision, which is not subject to appeal, everything else is chatter about democracy, but

completely idle in life, the president of ukraine kuchma may have the last word . the ukrainian rada may have the last word. cannot, because any decision can be hindered by the president. this is actually, two power in the country, which is the absence of power. as such, that is , without power, there is less demand from kravchuk, but kuchma yushchenko yanukovych poroshenko zelensky, under many of the presidents of ukraine, there were actually two powers in the country, or even three powers , if you add the oligarchs, or even four, if you add the puppeteers of the west, and none of them could give their ukraine strong presidential parliamentary parliamentary power presidential dictatorial authoritarian oligarchic doesn't matter. what kind of power can be good or bad, but monstrously without power, this led ukraine to war ; the first decision will stop the war for ukraine. two powers and a second establishment in the country

strong power, that's all politics. my name is igor tur. this was my propaganda going out into the fields every morning. we do everything to ensure that our country lives in peace and creativity. somewhere in the 6th or 7th grade i was his assistant on the combine. niva k5a1, so i

started on this combine with an assistant at one time. i started in 88 on the mtz-50. this is such a rare tractor, our belarusian, which the cabin could be divided in half. now clean in the morning, changed clothes, served. then you can dance at the wheel like at a wedding this year. i for the first time in his life and for work here on the farm, working on a combine for the first time took the first thousand in the region. here, of course it's nice. i'm the first, not someone. that's out, damn it. you won’t give fertilizer on a shelf, plus the weather conditions

will not give me any bread , i always have a good relationship, because you can’t throw away bread, even my parents taught me. let we were not born in wartime during the blockade. here are people for a crumb of bread, they were dying of hunger there. so bread - this is what the head comes home to work, pulls. no such a notion that now i live in an apartment. no, where is the best place to go at work? than at home it’s just not a habit, but already a craving. by the way, this is a job that benefits people. i think so, what else can be brought by our work on the farm, only enjoyed the market should be like to work. yes, you love to work. i think this should bear some fruit. and if you treat, for example. if only nothing like this would happen. how many

deposits for large families have already been opened in our country since the launch of this program and how many applications for early use? since 2015 , more than 128,000 deposit accounts have been openly credited to them with 826 million us dollars and more than a billion belarusian rubles since the twentieth year, the family capital is assigned to belarusian rubles. well, if you look at the statistics in belarus, there are 122,678 large families. this is the data for the first of august, that is,

100% coverage of family capital is practically ensured. total applications submitted. we need an urgent disposal of funds of 72.5 thousand. and how many large families have already used these family capital payments. how many people were used and for what purposes does it mainly go today? 70,000 decisions have already been made on the early disposal of family capital funds from the twentieth year, from the twentieth year it is allowed to use it ahead of schedule. that is, immediately after the appointment , more than half of the families have already used these funds 70,000 solutions - this is approximately 55%. and the majority of families and the main direction, of course, is the improvement of living conditions. 83% of inventors spend their money on improving their living conditions 10% on

medical services and 7% for education. surely you keep various statistics on demographics, and which regions in belarus are considered the largest with many children and why the three regions with many children are brest minsk and gomel 80% of large families raise three children, the remaining 20% ​​- is four or more children. the most-most large families. we have 13 children. in total , there are two such families in belarus. they are in the brest region and the minsk region, 31 families are raising 10 children. well, for the full picture five or more children are brought up in six and a half thousand seven. well, what other effective measures of such state support for large families? and in belarus, they use something that really helps support our demographics for large families, uh, complex measures are applied in all areas

, guarantees of benefits are provided. well, for example, to improve housing conditions , state support is provided, preferential loans are allocated. grant grants for building reconstruction acquisition housing. well, this is in addition to family capital. when receiving education, for example, in kindergarten, a 50% discount on the cost of meals is provided. uh, free school meals. well 50% discount with the cost. e for textbooks , annual large families receive financial assistance to prepare for school. uh, if let's say a family is poorly provided for, then state targeted social assistance is provided. this is a one-time payment, monthly and free food for children under 2 years old. there are tax incentives. there are pension benefits. there at the wife, for example, here labor guarantees

one of measures. e can be illuminated, if let's say 7 m three children or more under 16 years old, then one of the parents has the right to an additional day off of the week, this day off is paid. and of course, uh, if, for example, a woman gave birth, gave birth to five children, raised these five children, then such women are awarded the high state award of the order of the mother.