not customs benefits, for example, labor guarantees are one of the measures. e can be illuminated if we allow the symmetry of children or more under 16 years old, then one of the parents has the right to an additional day off, this day off is paid. and of course, uh, if, let's say, a woman gave birth, gave birth to five children, raised these five children, then such women are awarded the high state award of the order of the mother.

the significance of belarus geopolitical significance of belarus significantly exceeds the scale of our country and its resource an opportunity, if i immediately liked the president that we have been living in a peaceful and peaceful independent belarus for 30 years due to the fact that every day we are preparing for war. weakness war does not forgive unwillingness we are peaceful people these are the first lines of our national anthem no one believes in the possibility of war. and why are the poles

progressively increasing their military spending, we understand that if we don’t finish it here now, then our children will have to finish it nuclear weapons means of ensuring our security means restraining those madmen who would like to repeat the forty-first year of the markov project nothing personal only the truth, which is always more interesting at home. watch on tv channel belarus 24. hello

greetings to all who are with us now. if you want peace, prepare for war as relevant as ever. so, let's start with this topic, we fix the provocations reported that over the past. for weeks, belarusian servicemen detained several people ; a drone operator was also detained, who tried to launch an aircraft on the territory of one of the

military units. in addition , several attempts to fly over a protected area were prevented by means of electronic warfare. i welcome our guests. andrei petrovich is what says that we will not have to relax and will not leave us in peace. well, we do not relax, it should be noted that, firstly, for such cases. they happen regularly, and there are violations of truly military facilities in protected areas. secondly, of course, it should be noted that when crossing objects that are guarded by the armed forces, one must remember that this is always an act, well , violations of this may then follow as an administrative or criminal liability. well, and most importantly, i would like to say that in any case, today you enter there, when you get to the territory of a military facility there, but completely different laws may apply, which are determined not just

by some general rules established or legislation, in addition , there are charters for garrison guard services. the lips of the inner service that give the right military personnel to use weapons in case of disobedience or in case of a clear attack on the object. this is what everyone should remember . you still think everyone has heard of this case by an airplane, 50. when was the flight and the terrorist act against this aircraft made? we all see how the situation is developing on our southern borders on the western borders of our country , the level of terrorist danger is really high, and it was the military leadership that made the decision to ensure that all outfits, all guards, serve in full equipment with ammunition and related systems that allow, firstly , to organize surveillance and reconnaissance. second, monitor the situation. third. these units are like guards and outfits. they are reinforced by duty units and

rapid response units. well , we also have new tools. this is electronic warfare electronic suppression, it is correct to say these objects and that's it. this is also coordinated together not just by the military separate militia. a separate kgb everything. this is valid in a single system, so we have the ability to quickly open, detect and , uh, act accordingly. why were these five cases just presented, because they are already out of a row. out there appeared people who don't just engage in that pampering that's often the case. i spoke at the beginning of the cases. this is pampering. it's just that the boys want to climb onto the object , something else. well, there are different cases. and here the names of photos and video filming of military facilities are already involved in these cases. uh, state security agencies, police agencies and i think that in the near future an important moment will be announced in moscow with a large-scale conference on international security , our minister of defense is speaking there. viktor fucking. i outlined several

fundamental positions of the republic of belarus very clearly. i will briefly dwell on two. although i recommend that you listen carefully to dive into it, in the near future a new version of the concept of national security will be adopted, the minister announced. that is, essentially. it means we're on the move with time. that is, we react clearly to what is happening and once again sent the necessary signals to those who do not get it from the first second third time. we will do everything, the minister said, so that no one tries to tell the belarusians. how to live on our own land, and added our army is ready to repulse anyone, it will try to encroach on the independence , sovereignty, territorial integrity and constitutional system of the belarusian state and its allies that we live in a peaceful country. it's not an accident, it's not luck. this is the hard work of the secret services. state of the president. otherwise, we would not live in a mine country. everything would have been destroyed.

if the war were already blazing, attempts to destabilize the situation in the country did not stop and the dreams of the west that belarus would be geopolitically turned away from russia and turned into an anti-russian springboard would not stop, but only for this we need them, these dreams have not gone away. for many years they did everything for this to happen, this and coup d'état, this is an attempt inside. country, and now also the external impact, and the minister of defense was extremely frank. he told the truth, if today belarus had not done everything for security over the years. it's not just tactical nuclear weapons. this is not only a joint russian grouping, it is also our army, which we have been strengthening over the course of all these years, the west would have attacked belarus a long time ago and we should never have any illusions. the west was not afraid to attack some country when they were sure of their victory the second moment. today is the moment. why did the minister of defense focus on

poland poland is not an independent state today, this country is extremely dependent on the united states of america and can, without the knowledge of the polish people, do not ask, in fact , the poles do not want to fight. these are our neighbors . this is not necessary, they can be thrown into the furnace of war, do not ask, but because everyone sees. why there are more provocations on the border with belarus now. and look, what is happening in ukraine every day, russia methodically continues to solve the assigned tasks in the west, you already grab your head. how prolong the war? how to make sure that the victory of russia was not? uh, this is good, it is necessary to extend the war further, so there will be more provocations of terrorist attacks on the territory of belarus , there will be more destabilization of attempts . at least it is trying, but we see from the way delegations come to us, how we are developing relations in those countries that

used to be called distant arcs, judging by we understand that they are close to us, more than ever e cannot be demonized to the extent that they defined for themselves, nevertheless, against the backdrop of all the aggression that our neighbors, who oleg sergeevich said, here we are watching poland ukraine the baltic states we are broadcasting the president has several moods for constructive relations, and when meeting with the staff of the national airport, he commented on one of the fragments , i propose to listen to one of the fragments now, and then we will definitely discuss it again, i emphasize that we are not going to fight with anyone. i tell you it is constant therefore we are peaceful people. we want to cooperate with everyone. yes, now we live at the expense of, first of all, the east of russia , china to cooperate. well, do not forget to look at the technological west, they are nearby. they are our neighbors the european union and relations with them should not be lost. we are ready for this, well, taking into account our own interests. believe me. the time will come. now such turbulence in your

language speaks of great difficulties, but this is what we are in the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth year. i'm sure there will be major changes in the world. including here is such a position. how do you like belarus has long gone beyond the assessment of bilateral relations, we and alexander grigorievich confirmed this, because his speech was very concentrated and contained many meanings in a variety of areas, at least three and a conversation with the poles, because it was precisely more in this we concretized the conversation, of course , the belarusian people and the polish people will spend too much financial effort and, in general, efforts in order to build system of regional security and logistics and just give it all away for the sake of, for example, ambitions. at the current stage , the poles will not turn out to be balanced, pragmatic people

. the president has repeatedly spoken about this ; the moment will come when it will be possible to conduct a dialogue with them not with the authorities, but we cannot talk. about poland we always talk about warsaw today. and one more very important point, the changes that we are waiting for and the president said on the 24th and 25th. eh, this is not something qualitatively new, cardinal new , this is the deployment of those processes that we we are seeing the president today. marked a very important direction. this is economics and technology. well, our beloved political sphere, the weakest sphere is the political one, in our minds the binding to the elections of the united states of america is firmly entrenched, we are waiting for them and we are hoping for some result, but hegemon, the one that we created for ourselves, it is no longer there. no matter how much we talk about the fact that he rules poland, poland manages itself to a much

greater extent. therefore, yes, everything is fine here. sounds absolutely. i wish that uh, indeed, in poland they thought so, how to speak, but now dudov is inferior and his lips are not visible. here he sees that, relatively speaking , his neighbors in the east are ready to lend a hand. and they do not look like those who want normal good neighborly relations. well, now there is an election campaign going on, so the president should change his rhetoric dramatically, by the way, speaking about this, he said that in the coming months we can’t count on the fact that some kind of dialogue is a dialogue word before the elections, i would cancel it altogether, because it’s impossible while talking, and after the end of this election campaign hysteria. he undoubtedly started, which means that he no longer manages anything, because it is not an independent economy that belongs to them for a long time. this time, the second is all welfare. poland - this is money from america to fight russia and belarus what the president said, it means that europe will not go anywhere from us.

this is true europe will not go anywhere from us, and it will wake up. she is already waking up. it will become independent, sovereign, we want it. such is the independence of the sovereign european union, and warsaw is planting. but the fact that the president spoke. if only they broadcast it on european channels. 90% of europeans would say, do we want another? why lie? why are we told every day? what is belarus or russia or pmcs? wagner wants to attack us, yes, who needs you, by the way , when we talk about peace, is it that what lukashenka and belarus are doing is not aimed at peace. yes, even tactical nuclear weapons are here for the world, if the risks of attack are higher today, and today they know overseas today the washington post wrote the truth. if someday warsaw takes this idiotic decision to attack belarus, it will be destroyed in two blows. and it's true, that's why we do everything for the world. they are for

the war. join our conversation such a question. maybe, well, purely speculate, of course. and what are we to do here? we argue, looking at what is happening, the president said 24 25 years, and we know, but especially on the internet, what well, for alexander lukashenko, fix. that he is a strong forecaster trying to listen to those forecasts which he gives. what do you think, what did alexander lukashenko mean? the fact is that, yes, in fact, the global layouts are determined around this period, after all, in fact. eh, what he writes about. generally. today is good. there, the american press is an analyst of the press, what biden did, in general , he probably made a mistake by positioning ukraine as the struggle of the states for their hero, and everyone knew the answer to the question. and what happens if the states win, but no one thought about answering the question. and what will be the price of losing because then the question arises. and why do you need nato after all, it is necessary - this is

an organization that sells insurance for the sale of security for the sale of guarantees there are thousands of members, such a terrible organization, it's crying 2% no one will attack you. ah, so it's a business much more than anything else. but if nato does not provide a guarantee, and it turns out that it does not provide then the question. what are the money paid for? and what will it cost and how will the americans be able to keep their hero, i realized what exactly we are actually seeing today two trends one trend - this is where biden tries to like the game of constantly doubling the stakes by tossing him that all new new stuff. it is clear that there is absolutely no sovereignty, that is, it will say to go. this was an old question. and who is more important, for example, in the same poland, coca-cola or the government is larger? her answer in favor of coca-cola is yes, because she manages the mass to a much greater extent, as, in general, a key owner of key assets. and so, one trend is, respectively, the doubling of rates by the united states, the second trend, which we we see that it is developing - these are countries of the non-

western world that are talking about generally speaking, so the order should be a little different. he must be fair. it must be non-manipulative. it should be, in general, quite interesting , acceptable to everyone, and in this regard, we see that china's initiative for some reason turned into an initiative from latin america to an initiative from africa, yes, that is, belarus, yes , again, i advocated a constructive peace talk for regional security that can be expanded, and we see that in in general, there is one approach agaltelny from the west and very balanced from the side of the non-west yes, where, in general, the world is watching. and what is actually more interesting and what where where exactly? where is the truth, right? that is, who, in general, is trying to appropriate their own. narrow selfish goals because the hegemon - this is a very unpleasant situation. because once a hegemon you sit on top of a mountain and then you try to push those who get closer to him with your feet, that it makes no difference who they are friends enemies allies not allies,

there is only a rigid hierarchy, but we are talking about another world about fair here, belarus and i think that in the near future it will become more often than a blitz. i think that she will soon become a member of the shels, and this is not the western world on other grounds, on honest grounds, which are actually much more constructively interesting in slightly different meanings. it needs individual meaning. where you can explore the moon and do not make transgender people. e through return to the conversation. oh. poland, we extend our hand in warsaw, maybe not even to warsaw, but to those poles who they want there are many wars in poland who are willing to lend a hand in return. we do it not in vain, and at the level of society there will always be many such people, well, the system will always be. and it grinds them, that is, one can understand that society is extremely rarely subjective only at critical moments. i here remember often all bring. uh, the quote was about democracy, how she says that democracy is the worst kind of government. if

you take into account all the rest. i even ask a question. what country was churchill talking about ? britain is there anarchy, that is, no there is no democracy there, but it turns out he was talking about democracy. as a kind of colonial government, when powerful it is quite normal quite effectively. in general, govern other countries. they will be sure that they themselves are quite confident in making decisions, that is, more in this regard is a very clear, controlled country, managed on the basis of ownership of assets, but on the basis of compromising evidence, which is probably on the leadership, which is definitely on uh, guide competing list. uh, the same civil consent, and in this regard. in in general, there is no need for any illusions about management. we have our this step is more for the future. yes, this is an attempt to look beyond the horizon at other elites, when other elites arise, they either arise explosively. yes, either numbers second will decide that they can become numbers first. yes, it can be different at some

point, when it turns out that the course that it is is dangerous, it leads to bankruptcy, and it does not allow reaching another fragment on this topic. there will be an opportunity to continue. yes, please, from the poles to talk and instructed the prime minister to contact them, that if they want, let's talk. let's improve relations, we are neighbors, and neighbors do not choose. they are from god, but, well, they have october 15, as you know, the main parliamentary elections. and this is a parliamentary republic and, of course, they need to escalate the situation now in order to, uh, show that they properly armed the country and rearmed, so until october 15 they are unlikely to make any significant changes that are beneficial to them and to us, they much is demanded of us, even simpler, but we cannot agree to this, because it is contrary to our interests. well, basically, it's poland that's escalating the situation here,

pushed with the west. even outside the americans, the americans made a bet. e, to poland, but the poles are not stupid people - these are our people, they are slavs, they understand everything perfectly , let's wait and see, but we are open for cooperation. it's not weakness that we reach out anymore. this is not an attempt to solve all these problems, that we are afraid of something, afraid of attack, afraid of aggression. no it is force. this is an understanding of what neighbors really are. we will not choose in any way, belarus as it stood here, it will remain so. poland must understand that in 100 years it is possible to build a wall, it is possible to build a dome around poland because the wall from migrants has not been submitted to a referendum. yes, and i'll just quote the secretary of defense. marisha oblachko, who in the social network x is the former twitter e, wrote the fourth question will concern

the wall. do you support the elimination of the barrier on the border poland was the ruling party correctly, the president said that he must prove that all her policies , which were so aggressive that they are defending poland, and they are supposedly defending the entire european union , are positioning themselves more as saviors to europe from belarus and russia, they must prove it, so the referee. i would advise the polish sejm to bring another dome for consideration around poland, because the wall did not save the americans from the mexicans and will not save them. what is a wall, how to escape from migrants with a wall. this is pr. this is money. this just theft. build a dome. but what should they understand? all the same, there is no getting away from us, and the president is right. he also says why they are infuriated by the visa-free regime. after all, the easiest way is belarus. and sometimes i hear such conversations. let's close everything. everything, in general , we will stop any relationship, let no one in. this is a weakness. we show strength , thousands of poles come here, and

the minister of foreign affairs is shaking with hatred among a thousand lithuanians and the polish government, what did he say? we cannot prohibit lithuanians from traveling by propaganda. let's drive licensing. this is their weakness. they get mad about it. they dream that belarus will go completely to international organizations, so that we do not participate in the olympic games. what kind of policy does it have for athletes, if an athlete? i am ready to act in such difficult conditions and win this is our strength, and not weakness and such a policy. we will continue andrey petrovich how do you watch me all this? well, of course, a very interesting question is raised, there are only four of them, but among them is this fence, which they shot 5 1/2 m into height, in general, they only interestingly posed the question to the builder. we ended up building an expensive fence. where millions of zlotys have been invested. and now we propose to determine whether we need a referendum, well , in my opinion, the question will be obvious, the answer will be obvious to people. they are tried every day. as they say, to persecute the confrontation

between east and west in their media, what is there in the east. there, the evil of all evil gathered together, the russians, together with the belarusians, invited pmcs and are trying to get along. yes, and they are still waving a nuclear baton, in addition, of course, how any pole will treat this today. well, what are we going to say? 93% support nato's actions. in poland, the population is what it means that every day they are dripping on their brains , it clearly shows where the good ones are, where the bad ones are, and yesterday the parade, which was held on august 15 , showed that in rhetoric it is andrzej duda, there is nothing absolutely peaceful, everything is aimed at everything, firstly, it is permeated with such russophobia and anti-soviet and everything points to the fact that we must protect the polish people, first of all, therefore, we must arm ourselves. we need to attract even more loans. for all this and more. here the head

of state correctly said the year 24-25 is very important for us. they are important not to show us for real how the alignment of forces has changed, no, the alignment of forces, the first thing we will see will be in the thirties and after the thirties. you look at all the concept documents that have been adopted by the nato bloc and the united states, this is what is leading poland today, they are all charged precisely with bringing everything to 30. moreover, it is clearly indicated who are opponents, who are friends , and almost every step of how they will act is spelled out, you just need to carefully look at these documents. they are in the open, what is in closed publications there in general, i think it’s even scary to imagine these issues, for example, in combat documents such as field manuals. there i will clearly find the organizational and staff structures of the russian federation and the procedure for using nuclear weapons at these facilities and everything else, but why is 24-25 important year. for us, this is an intermediate nearest our task. these are elections in our country and elections in

the russian federation at this time, if we conduct the elections correctly and conduct the way the elections should be held in our opinion. they are according to the standards that europe is offering us today and is being drawn there in every possible way, because for now we will live by these standards. we will never guess. what do they want from us, and the twenty-fourth twenty-fifth year. after that, we must clearly understand, can we create? sustainable first political system stable economic and military system of the third constituent parts. yes, you can talk about all nine areas, i have no doubt they are important, but these are the three fundamental whales, on which we must first of all create a base that in the future will give us the opportunity for our state to act. uh, on an equal footing in our region, and the fact that yes, the prospect is the sco. this i think is the most immediate prospect yet it is understood by the prospect of brix without any doubt east vector for us. today, this is the most important thing that gives us

support, that from which we can push off in order to then go back, unlike poland, unlike the west, we never went there with the crusades. you look at the poles, yes, they say that's right, they are slavs. they are ours today, we are already confronted with questions of genetics, and we see that we even have the same gene code there, for one, but they look due to the fact that they once separated by faith, right? in terms of culture, they became strangers to us, because they came here constantly with a cross, like a campaign, in the tenth year , some citizens saw inside one state, and there they did not become their own. and today they will be between the hammer and the anvil all their lives. you understand this as right in the holy scripture. yes, what should be between what and what can be in the west, they say about our elections. you would be right to say that by their standards. here are smart diplomats not fools who impose sanctions, what do they say, and what have we done with belarus after all, before we had the opportunity to soft forces through funds through the fifth deck through political parties that we financed

public organizations to somehow influence public opinion, belarus we , with our aggressive policy, were carried out. look what belarusians are doing. they threw out all the possibilities of soft power from belarus and they are sitting. you fools removed us altogether from belarus, so we correctly said the elections of the twenty-fourth year will be held according to our standards. let the suit standard be forgotten. once and for all, only the belarusian people will decide. how to elect whom to elect, where to elect and no fifth column. i'm happy for the first time 24 years will pass without a fifth column for 30 years. we had a fifth column, but now it won't be, but it won't be. here on this let's energy, yin, let's add holguin to our conversation. add i would pay attention to the referendum, because there is also a lot of sense in it, except for the fence of this fence. eh, the precedent is that the republic of belarus as a country, an independent

state, is mentioned in the referendum as a separate issue, this issue is debatable, of course. many will find different meaning. but i think that this is a precedent and such a rather serious one, and it is unlikely that we will find the next stories, if we look close, and such an inclusion. i think that if the poles had been told in 1920 that the republic of belarus would someday be featured in a referendum, then it would probably have been from the category of some kind of fabulous. history, but today it is. i think that this is a positive result for us. a and. uh, when we are talking about the proposals of alexander grigorievich, i would not say that we are extending our hand. i would say that we we invite you to talk on an equal footing, because when we extend our hand, it means that our position is weaker; our position today is very strong and stable, these poles. they say, uh, practically. every day that history needs to be written. today, the poles have a great chance and you need to write the history of the region today and the worlds as well, but belarus

has already done it. step forward. we delayed for the first time also history here and the starting point will start from us, poland is late. but we are talking about poland now, we can keep in mind, of course, we understand ukraine, that when we talk about planting with poland with the european union, we are aware that the peace track should be set up there, huh? in this case, it still rests on well, on the very same ukraine, we understand that it’s not zelensky that there are completely different people behind him, but on the one hand they are broadcasting their attitude in the form of the fact that this kind of zelensky’s peace plan is perceived in moscow as capitulation plan for russia that is unacceptable? the new york times asked peskov. he said that there is no basis for an agreement with kiev now and that moscow will continue a special military operation for the foreseeable future, and they are specifying. that is, if russia has plans to represent the new territory of ukraine, peskov replies that no.

we want to control all the territories that are currently registered in our constitution as ours, that is, in order to, let's say, wake up all these ties, we must deal with the situation in ukraine, it turns out like this. i think peace treaty peace talks to date impossible because the spectrum of problems is their issues that have been accumulating for decades. and it cannot be resolved overnight , including on the battlefield, but it will inevitably be stopped by a truce. and here, too , a platform will be developed in order to be able to go further. this is the transitional period. he will be very much before commenting and would like to briefly cite such a fact, perhaps it will be convenient from him. even somewhere to push off to add additional colors, unfortunately, not bright to our conversation, in general. the desire of the zelensky team so that you do not fight to the last ukrainian. she hits the ukrainians better than any lancets. and this

is considered among the population. here is such a betrayal of revealing questions from the grudges, what are you most afraid of asked the ukrainian soldiers in the trenches. so the main thing they are afraid of 72% is that after the war the state simply takes care of them , it turns out that most of the male population who are now fighting on the side of ukraine they are afraid that people are on the bank, if heroes are needed, then only posthumously, of course yes, but it is also aimed at the national construction of ukraine, if you look at both the ukrainian game and the cult of heroes, this is still a cult of a dead hero, that is, in order to become a hero you need to die. that is , it turns out that the concept of motherland is such a very childish concept, and, moreover, it is absolutely not christian. that is, you die, then you become a hero. here is the cult of the dead hero. this is what was built, in general , along with the language consoles of the last years,

probably, 8-10 is quite active on in fact, here in poland we notice the same thing. this is very close to objective programming. and in my opinion, we said in one program that, in principle, a normal person comes from the three categories of the system. yes, that is, when there is, and good and evil is a measure that allows them to balance, and a person is manipulated and bent into two categories. his thinking stops and all thinking comes down to choosing this side, which is presented to him correctly, that is, one is represented by white , the other is represented by black, and then i will do right choice. yes, that is, a person turns into an ant, and not into an independent creature. why is christianity in this plan? so important? yes, because the same three categories are the same christian trinity that makes you think , makes you stay human, as soon as there is a transition between two categories, there is a transition from faith to paganism. yes, that is, a very rigid manipulated thing that is happening now in lovemaking is an absolutely clear plan. and this is

absolutely not accidental. this is also a solid plan. that is, on the one hand, there have already appeared brazilian such black jokes, something e a man who exterminated almost all bandera in ukraine from this side. in general, it came up, but nevertheless, it turns out that yes, because ukraine, uh, just like poland, is a classic western model of governance. alliance with the elites at the expense of their own societies. so in this regard , the elites will be fine with them. with him, and everything will be in order. in terms of money , financially, in everything else, even with the place of residence. but their society will have to pay, and this is, in general, a model system, which works successfully in the anglo-saxon model of fear for about 200 years, in general, failures in such special critical ones. if there were, then only on our territory, let's say, put down the october revolution and so on. here in this regard. unfortunately, it's all sad. yes, that is, here it will not go

somehow differently, if we talk about the course of hostilities about the same truce, and in fact. why did peskov say about the territory that the territory is not at all included in the goals of the military company; the goals of the military campaign were declared putin this is denazification, where we are the elitism and the neutral status of ukraine , as if they were achieved due to the fact that these conditions were accepted by the ukrainian leadership. for god's sake, the war in this place becomes as if not achieved due to the military victory, for this russia will have to capture most of the territory of ukraine at least the whole of ukraine also the second option, that is, in any case , these three principles, they remain inevitable, and in this way they will reached the tenth issue. that is, the territory is not. in general, some kind of goal here is the goal achievements. here are these three principles, and the territory is a means with an instrument of achievement. this is how offensive the goals are in all this, that when we now hear the statement literally by the leadership of ukraine that they are not ready not only for some kind of negotiations, but to talk on the terms of any russia, they will not immediately understand that the negotiations will

not between ukraine and russia, and negotiations will only be between the united states of america and russia, this is the tragedy of the ukrainian people, that they do not solve anything. in general, i don’t want to say anything, that i think there will still be several million veterans. yes, and the main part will be those who did not fight, in general, the front, did not come close. but this, in principle, is how everything is arranged in ukraine now. and the armed conflict itself is only what it is fraught with so that well, let's talk objectively. and this is fraught with the fact that inside this state it will continue to heat up. uh, well, civil strife is a split for sure. no, there will be no enemy. again, ukraine will be divided into west and east, you know, well there will also appear, obviously, this neo-nocist movement, which is now progressing there in the literal sense of the word. as far as the armed conflict itself in ukraine is concerned, i think that it will last another year, to no one's advantage.

today, neither one nor the other side is negotiating, because there are no points of contact on which they can be conducted. ukraine today once again needs to be understood, if poland is a dependent state, where and what they say to do, then ukraine today has become simply a territory on which played out armed conflict between the two sides may be the first such proxy, a serious conf. between the west and the east, and we see so far that the russian federation is actually alone. yes, they are fighting against, well, 50 western countries are fighting quite successfully. the russian federation is a very strong state on it has a huge, both military and human potential. well, look, she finds it necessary to call there only 300.000 from to mobilize 300.000 people. she thinks these are enough for now. forces to enter defensive actions. now imagine the military potential that we could remember there from the time of the great patriotic war or something else , how quickly this conflict could end, but i say again that the question is imperfectly not

raised in ukraine as a state, but the question is worth those interests of global interests, which were said before the start of the special military operation and were voiced. she said in ukraine knew what you are saying that russia only mobilized 30,000 people. even in ukraine, people understand. she says, listen if russia wants to. she would have bombed everything here, why do they only bomb warehouses. why are aircraft factories bombed, because nato is waging a war against russia in relation to the war, and russia is conducting a special military operation about belarus and the poles. let the polish leadership remember that there will not be a special military operation with them, they will simply be wiped off the face of the earth. god so as not to conduct a walkie-talkie in poland, then it will be carried out in the next 2-3 years. through the poles are not a coup, in a couple of minutes we will continue the conversation. stay with us. we continue africa nigga. she, especially for

narrow specialists, will also say a neger, but since she sees from him the french colonial spirit. still niger for reference, both pronunciations are acceptable. so the tension remains on the one hand the position of the niger authorities. and those who are ready to support the neighbor could have their hands on the other side of the conductors of interests in paris and washington on the continent. and kirill gennadievich will reach the great war, and on today, while the orcs are walking, and it’s quite interesting, because e we see that there, if it’s, well, here, which very much demonstrated here, that adults will lead the conversation. yes, that is, a macron is not needed , an adult immediately came to decide, but you adults also did not decide anything further on the leaks that exist in the states, for example, it will absolutely suit the observance of american interests while completely throwing out the french. here, too, to the issue of allied relations on quietly leaks that are. and the option e of a serious conflict, provided that not all african countries are ready to fight, there

are nigers, to be ready to fight there sufficiently large armed forces. that's while she also took the position of bargaining. and what do you pay us what you give, that is, the president on the one hand of nigeria turned to his parliament, that is, to send troops there to the parliaments - this decision was blocked, that is, the position of bargaining was indicated. place your bets. well, for now, this is the situation. who? what bets will he make, because even the question arises, can there be a compromise option when france remains and without uranus, europe will remain without damage, but the united states will remain with its assets, which are quite important, that is, the states, for example, are absolutely satisfied with this option. it would have fixed the colonial status of europe, yes, that is, in this regard, it is not if the scientific options for development, but the military option, in which, say, the same wagner will enter. in niger and in general, she is with her, how will she join four other countries where wagner is generally present, her presence

is quite active, also not an excluded option, moreover, these options may combine, take into account that the united states , as a rule, is still given by its broadcasting. that is, it can start from the first option, then naturally flow into the second, and at the same time, a large-scale conflict is somehow not very hard to believe today. for the simple reason that france does not have the resources for this, the united states and the resources for this are not. and the presence of russia, china, uh, in africa is quite serious, that is, here the question arises further that all the west was preparing for two collisions. these are ukraine and taiwan, but africa is not in the plans at all included and cut out and resources for the conflict. in africa, it is possible only through the first and second, and there are strategic things, that is, in this regard. eh nigga. it may well slip through this peaceful option. when the national interests are realized, when the control over the national resource is so, except for uranium

, there is by and large nothing now, but they are trying. here they said about the mirny track, uh, they are considering an option. that is, as long as it goes. like you said trying to collect bets new nigga leadership, trying to enter his diplomatic track. here is the new leader of niger, the head of the national council for the salvation of the motherland, general abdurakhman, and a little earlier, she announced her readiness for negotiations. through, secondly, he indicated that the desire to resolve the problems that arose before the country exclusively by peaceful means. this one, by the way, he is orthodox, i wanted that, which is also very important, that i wanted to say two interesting points. here's a hold on uranus. and the europeans are used to being tilted. they are happy to buy on this americans. uranium is also being bought by naftogaz now and you say that you have strengthened your independence and sovereignty will explain the second point to people later. see how americans spend. chaotic politics, but for the whole european union they tell. you must defend your principles as soon as

these events began. in our country, it’s like if there is a coup d’etat in the country, if these people support the russian federation, these are bandits, if they made a state transfer and said, we will fight russia all the way the european world and the us said the democrats came to power. they need to be supported, finally, the example of myanmar well, what is happening there, for the sake of democracy , hundreds of officials are being destroyed, terrorist attacks are being killed, the americans are silent applauding everything is fine. but there is one more moment arrived, when the americans come to the negotiations, they come out in sentences. we are ready to recognize the regime, where the principles are first and second. i would like to return to the moscow security conference, which was there the situation in nigeria was considered and there is one trend, which must be understood in the book against the backdrop of the events that are taking place in ukraine, the success of the russian federation is in the background. the fact that russia has become independent, these are the trends in africa they will continue. after all, the whole world is looking

at russia. they understand that nato was not so omnipotent. the only thing i disagree with you. this is what i think, that just such a big war for africa will await us all. africa no one will give it back. everyone understands perfectly well that africa is strategically now an element of the future for europe for the usa a here let's collect another opinion of olga grin , most likely that yes, yes, but here again the question. where do they get the resource argument that your argument is that africa alone will not leave just a figure. yes, africa, after the end of the bipolar confrontation, began to live relatively, the ears of the west 14 times. yes, so, that is, there is a question of questions, what was this confrontation, if there were no ukraine , then, probably, we would have seen a completely different scenario in africa and e. taiwan would not then have served as some kind of barrier to implementation of such an armed scenario,

but the nigga is the fourth already. yes, but niger is already the fourth episode in africa, and this is how it works, uh today, the united states and in resources, my colleagues are constantly saying, uh, just in favor of my thesis that there will be negotiations on ukraine, because e, the exhaustibility of resources was recorded by all participants in today's discussion. uh, and the united states can't scatter all over the world today. here is a situation that just shows it. and as for, and the fight for interests? yes, of course, uh, both the united states and europe have africa in mind but haven't kept it for a very long time. but there is a radical change in the situation. unfortunately, they cannot, if they did not have such resources, then china would not be able to gain a foothold. in africa, in order for this to cause such a heated discussion and anxiety in the early twenties, that is, they

have already missed africa, so you are today’s scenario , such an armed russian experts, i join in the majority and foreign ones do not consider such an increase in conflict and armed scenario. but this is good for our region as well. this is a kind of new model being built. we may not see it yet, but i think these are the events of the week. this is a certain military element in what will happen in our region. as you see, it will come to such a large-scale clash, which will change the general balance of power in the world. well, firstly, i would like to say here it was very correctly noted that the roots go. well, absolutely africa is, as it were, a consequence of that politics that is going on. you look at the beginning in europe they began to land a little on germany, this is the first european economy, so that, as they say, it will stop politically and economically influencing these events that are taking place around in order to weaken

the european union, the second kit on which europe stands . france and france today is, in fact, one colonial power, probably the last one left. it also has a french hyale in south africa. she also has polynesia. she has a southern the french islands of their territory, south here is the island of kergillen. all the rest. that is , in essence, today they put france. uh, she started, as they say to chess, any next movement will be there a conflict there will be no conflict. in any case, it will be directed against france. well, imagine there, how many different structures are involved. we don't take. this is the african union as a whole, which is, as it were, more of such an advisory body. although he has his own military structures there. but they got stuck there in mozambique everywhere and it is unlikely today that the african union will use its armed units there, the ecowas organization, which is promoted as an economic, well,

first of all, it has very serious military forces. well, how seriously, according to the latest data, they have already collected, supposedly about. 25,000, of course, nigeria is headed by this powerful state. she alone there, in principle, managed, there are about 160,000. he has an armed forces of only about 100,000 ground troops. but if in this situation eco really enters you and returns e muhammad abazuma back to his place, then they are unlikely to give this france the opportunity to use these bowels that are available in the world again, for sure, there will be some other other force that will transfer this uranus on other grounds well to hide uranus, france buys from a niger for 12 dollars, and sells for 1808. can you imagine what realism is really not about there, because what distinguished those colonies that were still there when they simply deviated. here's some onism before the metropolis was responsible

for what happens in the colony, and now the metropolis and she doesn’t give a damn who cuts whom, who kills whom and who does what in general and the most important thing is to pump out all the resources from there to get the maximum profit. and today these countries have really rebelled against all this inside this africa, and so these conflicts do not stop. you just think whether the army will collide or not. yes, there, if you look at more than 100 nationalities of nationalities, there is and everything, everything that is mixed there only already you say that there is arab africa, black africa, and so on, white africa, yes, where is there, and so on. that is, this is a colored colored continent in itself, but it is torn apart everywhere , there you can, all the more so, see the development of all mankind conditionally, you can say in the same niger you can see it, starting from cannibalism and ending with socialism. you understand all these elements of this system and the development of mankind to say that there will be an armed conflict there. i think that most likely everything is going to this, because that we need a serious redistribution of the world, we will redo

the world, without military conflicts without military conflicts. not only the military conflict is not like that. what do you think, do you think the american troops landed no. you know, as usual, as they do in the middle east. that's when we say you are right. say how many ethnic conflicts there are in africa, and who finances them? and whoever does that the traveling on constantly continued so this is the essence of western policy to play off, and arm, and then support one side, then the other cut each other. they reconciled them, they took the assets, the sunnis, the shiites are fighting , because of which who pits them, in addition to these religious issues, americans hate when sunnis and shiites live in peace. they are these negotiations that have taken place between them for them. it was a tragedy, they need africa to constantly blaze. so they did the same with ukraine. they would do the same with belarus. here they would need a civil war sergeyevich, they need a civil war. what was thinking about this, by the way, with what we said about europe

is happening in africa and perhaps now we can draw some main conclusions from what was said today. look at the international anti-fascist congress. here, in general, it is surprising, and such a verdict to our time, that in the xxi century , instead of the whole world there to explore new planets. uh, it's right to evolve to develop technologies, that is, we are again and again forced to face this social ugliness called fascism, which is not just some kind of degeneration. here, of course, evolutionary, but an artificial tool that he plans to use. here's how to get to that point. we thought that in the 20th century, our grandfathers finally finished it off. for the last 400-5 years, when anglo-saxon uh imperialism has been developing. let's not forget that every 6 days this will not be a country celebrating its independence day from

great britain. that is, it was a global empire with global management tools and know-how. well, again, i will say that the last bright noha was developed back in the middle of the 19th century, when britain understood how to manage, and manage it through cognitive programming. uh, flashing brains when some concept is abandoned. and you already know what the result is. he will come in 10 years. that is , here is the brilliant knowledge that the british received. basically, random. this is a separate issue. somehow it turned out you are leading to the fact that the international anti-fascist congress. it can even specify the international anti-anglo-saxon which is essentially. this is what it is, this is our theory of exclusivity, when you consider yourself a subject, and the rest of the world an object, but sorry, it originated in britain somewhere else in the seventeenth century. that is, when britain positioned that it had its own

world, when british conservatism arose , that it was its own world, where the rule operates, while the outside world is where you have the rules, maybe not to apply this object. that is, in this regard, i will remind one philosopher who spoke about german fascism. he says the germans, what have they done it is clear that the british always meant that the british in this regard, in fact, proceeded from this, the whole british empire that there are still first-class people, that is, well, first of all, these are aristocrats, yes, which means there are approximately 1.000 years of history that the conquerors showed up there in their time. and it's a white heap, hasn't gone anywhere. she controls the situation and eats everyone else. that is, fascism is always the positioning of the fact that there are the elect and there are those who can be considered, and not people. and this paradive is so convenient that every time it is forgotten, when it is forgotten, in principle. in one format or another, it will always arise, that is,

the question. uh, not only in the need to eliminate fascism. yes, but you need to approach its origins from the other side, and to the one who allows himself to consider himself exclusively a creation in the world, and treat the rest as objects. yes, i think that anti-fascist congresses in the republic of belarus this is another second one - this is not a struggle. with something new not fascism neo-nazism. eh, here is a question of memory that we, uh, must always remember. i think this is not the last one they should be held every year. and we do not choose neighbors alexander grigoryevich said, well, we must remember that people living next to you are peoples who initiated two world wars. we are all obsessed with world war ii. it seems to be more than a memory, but after all , two wars went through the republic of belarus and no one has yet given an answer, but to the question, what was it? what prompted them, uh, to use such means

in the center of europe, which today looks super-democratic, which dictates some conditions to us, but we remember their past and the congress is the memory of those who died. and here in the republic of belarus in the russian federation and in general in the post-soviet space, this is a reminder to them of what they were, because they already forget their history a little. but we cannot forget it, so this is the natural course of things for us. this is not a fight with something new. it's a reminder of what was that will never go away, indeed it will always remain someone above someone below and democratic principles. that is, that's all that is universal. uh, canvas, which we are offered today. it has completely become a weapon of democracy - it is a weapon of human rights - it is a weapon of the rule of law. this is a weapon. we are an anti-fascist congress - this is still a struggle. and with that quite interesting, what do you know for? recall the immortal film such as seventeen moments

of spring and the dialogue between müller and stirlitz, and when müller spoke about the party's gold and contribution to the future. he said very interesting words about what if somewhere ever instead of words. hello. you will hear the word heil in relation to any individual, then you should know there they are waiting for us from there. we will begin our great revival. look how real these prophesying words are. today they work in the same europe, look at what is happening today in ukraine, look at what is happening everywhere in all countries. the same thing for latvia is the most important thing that can be said that at the beginning there is always a black clear form, as nazism is born today. yes, it has roots there from the end of the 19th to the beginning of the 20th century. well, look how it takes roots at the beginning, anti-sovietism is sure to go.

russophobia and then nazism , you always unequivocally understand these three actions following each other. why today young people are again beginning to perceive this nazi concept in its essence, because your people are offering it and saying it. he towers over all other people. you are not like everyone else, you understand this law of the aryans and that everyone else is under you this, as it were, elevates a person above himself, and when, on the contrary , internationalism is presented. all people are equal independence from themselves is the same and everything else is really needed here. here are these human values ​​absorbs well, the same thing. what role does the church play today? the same church, it becomes, as we can say about the kontopol patriarchy, the basis for the creation of sectarianism instead of orthodox churches on the territory of ukraine, and there today . their

again they begin to march across our europe, and here the head of state said very correct words, while we go and bring our children to khatyn in the brest fortress, while we visit, believe that fascism will never come here, and we will have a historical memory. and and we have something to remember, we have something to oppose 2 minutes literally we have left. yes, fascism was a tool and it will be necessary to tell the truth today. he raised his head again torchlight procession, again they kill you for speaking russian language is again killed for nationality. but there is one plus. they wanted to isolate us. they wanted us to become outcasts, and today the whole world is uniting around belarus and russia , what happened in moscow what will happen in minsk and how many countries come here, because our cause is just and we will win, like our food, and we will destroy fascisms and there is no other way. yes, i just wanted to add parts of the good definition that

fascism is appropriating the right to rob another due to the fact that it is not like you and this is it, just the same an absolutely unacceptable thing, because the world must be established on other principles, on the principles of fairness, fairness towards all. as a matter of fact, on what we also stand. thank you very much fixed. hey, i think that's a good conversation. got it today. i thank our participants for today everything.