hello, on the air, the program sas is authorized to announce that i am its host nadezhda sas, i welcome you and remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes , events, people will affect the life of everyone and the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. let's tell you right now, us president joe biden has been heavily criticized for his lackadaisical response to massive fires on the hawaiian island of maui, which claimed the lives of more than 100 americans for several days, while on vacation, biden, ignoring the topic, then promised the affected families compensation in the amount of only $ 700, and on tuesday, when asked what he could say about the record victims, he answered. i have nothing to add smiled and left the opponents. they could not pass by this and accused the baidan of indifference to the suffering of fellow citizens. meanwhile

, biden's main rival donald trump , the us law enforcement system does not get tired of making new accusations. so the state grand jury, georgia indicted trump and a group of 18 people, related to trying. overturn the results of the 2020 election, which the former president believes were rigged, now indicted on 13 counts. these include violating georgia's anti-racketeering and corruption law, incitement to breach of oath by public officials , conspiracy to forge and file false documents among allies, trump, who is indicted by his lawyer rudy giuliani, former white house chief mark meadows, and several advisers. the billionaire himself believes that the presentation of new charges against him is directly related to the election campaign in the country. the chief of staff

of the nato secretary general suggested that ukraine would be able to gain membership in the alliance in exchange for parts of the territory about it. he told during the debate the norwegian city rented in his opinion, this could be part of the end of the conflict, at the same time, he recalled the words of his chief secretary general. nato jens, stoltenberg, that ukraine should decide for itself when and under what conditions it wants to negotiate according to him after the conflicts, a discussion about ukraine's possible membership in nato is already underway, and during the discussion , options are voiced that provide for territorial concessions. kiev i'm not saying that it should be, but it could be a possible solution explained the politician. well , today in our program we will talk about ukraine about the future of ukraine to the famous german chancellor. otto von bismarck is credited with such words never lie so much as after the hunt during the war and before the elections, to say nothing of the elections during

the war. there are no limits to the lies of manipulation definition and it is in this way that the authorities are going to direct the already long-suffering ukraine about why kiev suddenly began to actively prepare for the elections. and what does this mean for the course of the conflict will be discussed in today's program , oleg idukevich, deputy of the house of representatives of the national assembly of the republic of belarus , chairmen of the liberal democratic party, will help me understand this topic. hello belarus. good afternoon today in the studio with us oleg voloshin, deputy of the verkhovna rada of ukraine of the ninth convocation another member of the movement, ukraine hello oleg hello and glad to welcome france damovich klintsevich military expert leader of russia to our studio. hello afghan veterans union. thank you very much for traditionally starting our program with us today with a blitz question, which is addressed to each participant in today's discussion of elections in ukraine under conditions of war. is it incredible enough to be true oleg events of the political

life of ukraine to us in my own personal memory, and always pushing the limits beyond what can be considered unbelievable and even because what is happening today i think all those present a few years ago. uh, in a nightmare it could not have presented itself, therefore the fact that zelensky's company was in order to maintain power. it's the only thing that works, uh, moves. eh, ready to do the seemingly impossible under normal election conditions, e. in the conditions of hostilities, and i think it is quite possible. france damovich, please, this is sheer profanity. elections cannot be held under these conditions, and no one will go to them. it is forbidden to get an objective assessment of too great losses and huge difficulties that ukraine is experiencing today a huge number of mistakes and miscalculations. and most importantly, the loss of full state sovereignty and dependence

on the united states of america and the collective west will not be given to ukrainians. well, no chance to support. uh, comrade zelensky who, as he says, we are all comrades here. oleg elections in ukraine yes , there is no point in these elections, because there was no choice in ukraine already. i don't remember. how old is the present democratic, because there are candidates who would stand, for example, for normal relations with russia, they are simply destroyed in any way, especially the fourteenth year , the second moment, but uh, ukraine has lost sovereignty zelensky does not solve anything. biden will give the command. will hold elections will not give the command will not hold elections. for what purpose, uh, or to geneticize zelensky and them. what difference does it make to be legitimate on it, legitimate in terms of what is happening there, they are completely controlled by the people, they do not decide anything. uh, actually this is the territory for resolving issues in the united states of america is a tool, so there is no point in these

elections. uh, so far i don't see any, but don't be surprised. thank you, it is important to note that the blind desire to simply break away from russia, which replaced the desire to become a truly independent state, turned ukraine into not even the fifty-first state of the united states. why does washington care so much systematically? today, ukraine is just a tool against moscow, a platform for earning in the price of the outflow of texation office , is it the fate of the earth, or serf mentality makes itself felt, and maybe a hopeless life in anticipation of a real owner led to such deplorable consequences. oleg i know that you maintain communication relationships with certain colleagues of yours who are now in ukraine. but indeed, the formation of certain political alliances is already being discussed , headquarters are being set up, and new political projects are being created. is it possible that once again the ukrainian authorities will be able to cheat

the ukrainian people? well, as alexander wrote sergeevich pushkin, to whom, unfortunately, monuments are being demolished in my homeland and it is forbidden to study him in schools , it is not difficult to deceive those who are glad to be deceived themselves. i would, despite the fact that we love to say everything there, each in his own country. it's about the wise belarusian people, the wise russian people, the wise ukrainian people. this, as it were , always sounds beautifully pretentious in fact. the situation that exists there, if something globally does not suit someone, this is always the result. and how she ordered, if not all, of course, then some kind of majority, according to at least in the nineteenth year, and here to my respected belarusian colleague, i do not agree, the election of mr. zelensky was the result of an absolute sincere expression of will, people wanted to simultaneously expel all the elite, which they thought they were sincere to steal there, and so on and so on and so on. there, they listen to either washington or moscow. and it ’s not clear to choose which actor they believed in the series, uh, who are the president, who supposedly ride a

bicycle. and there, from machine guns, he shoots those who exploded there. karpov got what received now ukrainians continue to stubbornly believe. unfortunately, even one hundred percent of the missiles that are shot down by the ukrainian air defense there are shot down more than the russians are launching, and the west is also capable of direct defense there. and at least, uh, in parallel with this action, there is severe censorship and repression, when those who understand that they are trying to sell some nonsense cannot express their opinion. actually, that’s why i am now in minsk, for example, not in kiev because i’m located, but today in kiev where i have memorized arrests and a criminal case on charges of promotion of pro-russian narratives to the verkhovna rada, which, of course, is wildness, because in any constitution of any country, and a deputy speaking from the rostrum has the right to say anything, except for direct insults, for example, another colleague. that is, i could have been firing at the verkhovna rada to say that i believe that it is necessary to restore the soviet union there in ukraine or become part of the commonwealth speech, this is the case of a ukrainian politician who currently has criminal prosecution in ukraine. this is

rather an advantage. you in a category adequate people who understand what it’s all about, what to exclude from what’s twitchy unfortunately, those suffering from hostilities from poverty from uh, loss of prospects from the fact that people are being mobilized in this way, there are enough people on the street and so on. people will want to once again believe in some kind of fairy tale, it exists, and i think, we'll talk more about this later, even for some kind of polyproct that appears when artificially. suddenly , some kind of positioner is being constructed and yesterday's person who received money from zelensky is already an arrest officer. and people begin to trust him to some extent to say that, unfortunately, unfortunately, the ukrainians have not yet got rid of it, and our expressions are good in the sun, as it is said in our anthem. yes, this is an absolutely mythological worldview, that at the same time, without making any effort, you can defeat everyone and become happy rich, like mmm. you know, here's the elemental hmmm, unfortunately, it's spread among

the part of the ukrainians who are suppressed. the rest that thinking minority that always said, guys it won’t be like this , it can’t be necessary to take into account the interests of the great powers, you need to take into account our geographical position, like it or not, russia is always our neighbor. this is a common history, this is just a great power and so on. thank you very much, france there, that you are a person so experienced, so the politics of me so called and you are fine. remember the whole history of independent ukraine, at what moment, in your opinion, happened, that notorious turn in the wrong direction, because at the moment in the ukrainian political elite there are still unsinkable political figures such as petro poroshenko and yulia tymoshenko, who for quite a long time after the start of the special military operation sat in the shadows and remained silent. and now they began to enter the political arena demanding the resignation of zelensky to overthrow the regime. what do you think, if these political figures have a future?

there is no future for these political figures, there is no doubt about it, but you have asked an extremely deep and meaningful question. and i, unfortunately, will try to be brief, but it is very difficult for him briefly answer, because many, probably, even here among the sitting competent people. in this studio, those who are not aware , for example, that the movement of hands that became nationalistic was once created at the direction of the ussr state security committee with an indication of ukraine supposedly to resolve some issues. i was recently at the birthday party of a very respected here, colonel-general of the smolensk region. he told when he was with his wife already being the commander of the regiment, an anti-aircraft missile served in lvov. he says,

the ninety-first year passed, these separation changes occurred, associated with a state act that did not exist at all, and then not gorbachev, not the state security committee, not the communist party did not give, did not show power in the teeth, but in the ninety- second year in january as soon as happened to him. representatives of the state security committee of ukraine also came and said, “comrade colonel, we have analyzed some of your historical events, your father. to the captain of the dead on the territory of the lviv region destroyed bandera and our great past of the ninety-second year you are an undesirable element in our country. here the wife can serve. and you, please in the century. imagine the ninety-second year, which means for this period, taking into account our history, why do i

always say that gorbachev yeltsin shushkevich and kravchuk are traitors to our country and the destroyers of our great motherland, and i will never refuse these words. no matter how liberal democratic some important processes no one hides behind, but today in the conditions under which we have been for a long period of influence on ukraine was colossal, so colossal that then kravchuk was persuaded and said it was necessary to give up nuclear weapons, because they did not want it to spread, but by and large in the three republics of russia, ukraine and belarus were nuclear weapons and the americans already thought and understood. and when we are talking about the 21st century, this is the century of the creation of a special type of military operations

, information and psychological operations, and in these information and psychological operations today, from the fact that the firmware of the ukrainian people is taking place, the reformatting of consciousness, it is colossal, but today, listen, they often scold me, but they have achieved such great success that they have managed to turn 90% of the population of ukraine on us, however, there are many of your specialists, who are deeply immersed. and you can probably support me. they know that many, well, do not sincerely say that other people have a different opinion, but nonetheless. this firmware happened very seriously and in these conditions they no longer understand. well, every day they drip, but they do not understand that a large part of the russian is being utilized.

the world of a large part of kievan rus and i, yes, i would also like to remind you why today we do not hear the voices of ordinary ukrainians, because by the beginning of 2021 zelensky had completed a complete transformation from a naive and inexperienced newcomer, ready, as he said, to give up power for the sake of bringing peace on ukrainian soil to working closely with the most radical russophobes in london in washington politics how the opposition was liquidated in ukraine under the noise wars banned objectionable party authorities established an information monopoly of power. recall in our story with the coming to power of vladimir zelensky, many ukrainian journalists are ordinary citizens. they were able to finally get rid of illusions in a democratic society and freedom of the media in the country, it was he who, by his decree, closed the largest positional tv channels. and despite the fact that the decision clearly violated ukrainian law, he challenged it in court. it

never succeeded curiously that a few months before the closing, zelensky's opinion was opposite. i really respect every channel. i have never closed a single channel in my life, i am personally for freedom of speech and you know it very well, i will never close any channels in my life i have no right i have no authority to censor. strengthened after the start of zelensky’s office with the help of the largest media holdings, launched a single news telemarathon, where leading experts actively promote not only the president, but his entire team reporting on successes at the front, in fact, the telethon has become for a significant part of ukrainians the only source of socio-political news, which is undoubtedly beneficial for zelensky to his team. and those who held a different opinion. they just removed them from the air, so it happened from the channel of petro poroshenko they were turned off. after the ex-president of ukraine refused to participate in the marathon, the adviser to the head of the presidential office, mykha podolyak, explained the decision by the excessive

narcissism of the former head of state in practice. it's just another way to set your monopoly in your wake. political parties have also been hit by the media. zelensky closed everything political associations, the course of which could at least slightly diverge from that adopted in the country. first of all. this affected all parties with a couple of russian views, the national security council of ukraine decided to suspend any activity of a number of political parties, and the ministry of justice was instructed to immediately ensure the cessation of the activities of these political forces, according to many experts. everything, this is undoubtedly connected with the upcoming presidential and parliamentary elections in ukraine see what elections are in ukraine who hates russia more. these are the elections they want to hold there now, returning from the nineteenth year, why do i think that there were no elections even then. here is a politician who is independent. therefore , there are criminal cases against him, because he defended the national interests of ukraine in ukraine

, there has always been an illusion of elections, like poland , now it will be elections. what difference does it make who wins duda or not, and those and those about the american forces will not change anything. they will argue whether there will be abortions or not, lgbt more less nationalism more and less, but the essence of polish politics will not change. in ukraine, everything is the same. only it was a little more difficult before the north-east administrative okrug zelensky who stood behind him before the elections was seen by all the wonderful people. why ukraine was under external control from this all, who appointed the us ambassador who was in kiev, no official could be appointed without actually agreeing with the administration of uh, the united states of america is an independent state. therefore, their elections have always been a purge of those political forces that would actually be in favor of an independent ukraine at the beginning of their soul or slowly, but they were not allowed to take part in serious political processes. and if medvedchuk had never won , they would not have let him win, just as they will never let him win

marila pen in france, they will never let him win, while the winner was tnt for germany, uh, in germany they even want to ban them now. that's what european democracy and american we control you. here is the illusion of elections of two or three candidates. and now it will be even worse in ukraine, the next elections will allow those who will compete to participate, who is more hates russia poroshenko will come out will tell i will this is how he will go to war, zelensky is there, anyone, who is still standing there, but they can still make it thinner , they can release a politician into the political arena, who, perhaps, will allow himself to say something else. but again , i doubt very much that such politicians as our friend is standing in the studio will be allowed to participate in the elections. but if they allowed it, they won, why did they ban anyone boobs ukrainians, they still and 10% will remind our respected viewers the rating of political parties in ukraine in

ahead of the swoo, it's february 2022. quite right, sociologists found out that ukrainians would like volodymyr zelensky and the servants of the people to continue to lead the country after the next elections. and now, in addition to this schedule, there was another survey conducted by 17% of respondents. they answered yes to question a 57. we would not want such a development of events, and now we see the rating of political parties the servant of the people has 11.5% that is , after a certain number of years, in fact, a few years have passed after the parliamentary elections, the situation has changed naturally, if it were not for the special, military operation, the rating of zelensky and his retinue would be zero and why were they closed at all, in principle, because the producer of our party, and moreover, not only by the members of the faction there, but also

by a political scientist there, journalists who shared our views were denied access to all other channels. that is, we were simply removed from the information field and still life, yes, and we do not care, by the way here in third place. but in what i fundamentally agree with my respected namesake that and if we took a schedule, e sociology for january of the twenty-first year, on february 2, they were closed, the tv channels were absolutely lawless, and after mi6 and the state department gave they said the go-ahead, we will cover you, moreover, there is a version of information that almost on their command, something was done there. and so, uh, we then had the first rating in the country, this is fundamental in what way agree as soon as here we are some colleagues of us. discussions, especially there in russia . here you are with medvedchuk koma, you lost everything, that we lost, we had the most popular media holding. we had the first rated game. we won the local elections in 2020 and formed the largest factions in the entire southeast in all regional councils where it was possible. and then , during a visit to london, mr. zelensky goes

to reacher namur, the head of mi-6 from intelligence, in an unprecedented way. that is, i can’t imagine all this in a nightmare, even yes, so that, for example, x lukashenka did not just take over. yes, there is the head of the intelligence officer of some structure of the friendly side. she was resettled there, and during the visit i went to his building. there is no one respected for instruction. the leader does not act like that, but he went there and he went there, as he himself came out from there. he said, he didn't reveal the details, but let it slip. we talked about the need to remove tv channels that do not support independence. e in a war. here is a key factor recently screaming from the status of a person who has come to power, because he said that the war must be ended. suddenly he said we have a war, so there are channels correctly, if the correctness is practically correct, correctly because he was told there in london. what are you doing, what is happening tomorrow the elections and what are you doing with medvedchuk there and the pzh coalition? maybe they will have a prime minister so that putin, roughly speaking , will get what he wants peacefully, because the ukrainians themselves want the ukrainians themselves want a balance, the ukrainians themselves want, if there are not

alliances with russia, then at least a partnership erased and definitely not a war. and after that, of course, i agree with the system that you at least jump out of your pants, when you, uh, when the party leader is placed under house arrest, when criminal cases are initiated, when tv channels are closed, when radical and nationalist groups are taken, which under control, the sbu begin to simply beat people on the streets and so on, then, of course, participate in the elections. unfortunately, the democracy that actually existed in ukraine and allowed it at the time. to the same inukovich to come to power in the tenth year. she , including the mediocre rule of yanukovych herself and, of course, pressure. the west and so on was mediocre, just a profanity and instead of going the way of building a sovereign state. as it happened in russia and belarus, why are there now sanctions and so on, ukraine went the simplest way. that is why mr. akhmetov always comes out of the donbass against us very simply. he has real estate in the west he has property in the west they have money for

west. he may be russian-speaking a thousand times, he may not know the ukrainian language at all , relatively speaking, he may hate bandera a thousand times, but when you have everything there , what some russian oligarchs have and so on. e you will always do what you are told, from there , otherwise, you will be left naked. i always go back 14 year, i'm sorry. here i always have before my eyes the fourteenth year and august of the twentieth in belarus, lukashenka and lukoyevich. here lukashenka took a tough decision and the country did not drown in blood. here, i dumped all the time, with another hand. here you take that day disperse to hell 100 people in total tough sanctions. let them lead the country saved. yes, yes, i say money, but now there were herbs. today, listen to this man. this is a man who went through fire and water, and now belarus come back and belarusian politicians. here we are , after the twentieth year, someone groans, cleared out public organizations, western funds. foreign-funded shut down you understand

there should be no fifth column in the country. that's when the fifth column is in the elections. the end of the country is the end, so little enrolled. here, let everyone hear the weeds. remove everything and 3 m into the ground. so that 50 years do not sprout in the elections. only national parties , sovereign state parties, as we now have 24 parties, should participate, and not one of them, which would not win the parliament, the communists of the ldpb, belarus, no one country will not deploy, as was the alliance with russia , so the constitution will not be destroyed. and somehow they had everything financed for ukraine frontier. all half of the party is funded abroad, and medvedchuk's party. they never let me win, because they defended ukraine interestingly, the question arises, but russia saw what was happening and where it was moving in front of a hedgehog. it is this reversal that was not pleasing. we do not wish the majority of ukraine thank you for this question. but despite the fact that your transmission is very serious. i want

to say about two olegs, please, you know, and maybe because i am in the middle , i will be lucky, because i am ukrainian oleg i wanted to thank what he did for vodka about inukovich, but the belarusian walnut. i want to scold a little, because he removed all my argumentation, removed it into an imitation of what i said, but nevertheless. i will find an opportunity to say what happened, and you oleg are absolutely right, after all, and when bolotnaya square began in our country and all these actions began. this is the successful informational psychological support of various kinds of military political events. economic, in which the anglo-saxons they imposed on us

this liberal vomit. i apologize for the word associated with various independent public structures, non-profit organizations, all sorts of ngos and created the conditions under which, with acceptable funding. they will blow up the entire public. and uh, unbalance social life, eighteenth year. the academy of the general staff is holding the final meeting of the academy of military sciences conducted by the famous military leader, the great scientist general of the army gorelov makhmud akhmetovich. at this meeting , the chief of the general staff of russia and then, in an unusual form, he devoted the entire report to the fifth colony, he said, guys , we can’t take me now. our

biggest danger is internal things, what is happening is trying to tear us apart from the inside to create conditions to discredit the government. and most importantly, that the foundation, as lech said, is enough. we made a lot of mistakes with these oligarchs and so on and created unprecedented things russia then dealt with this issue, but i remember our media almost everywhere in the media information. i referred to the events of the eighteenth year, trying to pay attention. take a look at what the chief of the general staff said, our political blog and so on we defend. every time, thinking, based on our mentality of decency, that we are giving signals. they read they don't care about these signals. they don't understand these. they don’t consider us to be salaries, they consider us outcasts

, they think that we should be like a harmful absolute seed that destroys their lives and destabilizes their economic well-being should be destroyed, and they took us for us . russia coped with the events in belarus . a random person in power i remember that let them not be offended, but a person who has two fates, two convictions and so on. it doesn't have to be, but nonetheless in this regard. we have some people, such as zurabov, who should soon. i would think to answer for all events. he then formed. i witnessed these processes, a close friend of petro alekseevich poroshenko,

when he said that this is the best president for russia, when these elections were taking place and edinokovych was being ousted, that today yanukovych is trying to sit on two chairs with these games, he led the country to this state. and let him not be offended. this is how they divorced him, like a boy, that today people in lviv region speak in lviv region today people who hate us hate russians and so on, they say, listen, how to make it so that he returned to the days of yanukovych they already understand these events, and then belarus and only the position of the president of belarus , who won utter respect for authority in the russian federation, allowed us to save the republic of belarus, our union state and the processes that we started in the twenty-second year. they could begin much more seriously in the twentieth year. and

then we might not have been ready for these processes, which is impossible to say, but in the current situation and i answer you with full responsibility, the americans today do not know what to do. they launched these mechanisms. they can't deal with our mentality. look, they started destroying the russian orthodox church by making it. uh, so to speak, the most destroyed bonds of our russian world, but they misunderstand that all specialists. they will work out that this will only strengthen us. this is testing us , including testing many serious people , until our patience runs out and we give them a hard punch in the face. i'm not talking about our main argument, nuclear weapons. we are talking about quality weapons, modern in conventional equipment, which

russia has and they are waiting today, because why are there many things in ukraine connected with a certain inactivity of the russian federation, because today the collective west, based on their tactics, the tactics of the expeditionary forces , are faced with a huge advantage of the russian, tactics and tactics of the continental state, and they are fighting the security zone. before reaching the first line of divisions. here is the first line of defense. i 'm not talking about the second about and the frontier, and today the worst thing i'm talking about is that we are utilizing the best russian people who today they are attacking from ukraine. well, globalists, unfortunately, do not need white orthodox ukrainians with traditional values, so they easily say goodbye to them and burn them in the furnace, because this concept of the man of the future is their vision.

of course they have nothing to do with her. you know, the other day there was a big interview with alexander lukashenko, and my colleague, the famous ukrainian journalist diana panchenko , the conversation turned out to be extremely relevant, resonant , frank, of course, ukraine was the most striking quote. now they will hear a lot many people are beginning to really evaluate zelensky. that is why he is rushing about calling elections when you have them there in a year or two, or using martial law to postpone them, that is, it is far from a very ambiguous fact that zelensky will win these elections. at least rivet him 90% of the rating there , i’ll tell you complete nonsense if the elections are held in the near future one of the military budans there or someone else becomes president, one of the military, but not him. well, if it’s completely

simple, you know how complex things are in simple language explain what and when it went wrong with us when you started to plunder ukraine if you want to maintain integrity on the part of the process of some company, the situation is, uh, to maintain integrity. this should be the unity. this core should be, first of all, the state core , as we always criticize it for this vertical power in dictatorships and so on, but it is she who is the vertical and and how do you call it dictatorship, discipline, order, they contributed to the consolidation around this pillar. whole people. well, we still managed to get through to the people to convey to them what needs to be done, including now i’m now putting, if you don’t want to fight like ukraine. let's work in the field people.

they hear it from you, it gradually took shape. on it began it was when you started handing out pieces of varnish and pieces to the oligarchs and in this way. you created a mass of centers of power centers, behind which stood the security forces, people with machine guns. i know kolomoisky taruts, firtyshs and other things there, only i, uh, remember the last name, they become. militants whom it was already difficult for the state to resist and remember, uh, volodya zelensky arrived somewhere in some part. eh, where did he justify? i'm not a goof. where they just talked to him. i once heard myself. i became terrified. this is generally unacceptable, the main commander, well , anywhere. you, a civilian journalist , could tell zelensky what you think is necessary in person, but not a military man, but it has already

come to that. that is, ukraine was dispersed , everything was divided into democracy, they began to play it to choose to re-elect everyone and blurred the responsibility by this very thing, but everything began with the privatization of your privatization of the homeless, when in a day one person , either a convict, or a former prisoner, or someone else became a billionaire. this is where it all started growing. and people offended ukraine , ukrainians were terribly dissatisfied with that situation and that's it. it accumulated, but from there the economy was the basis of everything, you destroyed the richest. and the most beautiful country by this same then, uh, these flayers of yours came into your politics billionaire oligarchs, they started, uh, elevating certain people to the top.

well, then they began to give away pieces, like poroshenko. take pieces of some kind of property to give to politicians, and they began to create something. and when politicians have a lot of money in their pockets, they are very tight and weigh on him. take the same poroshenko yes, and probably, they say the current president. uh, everything, the best in the west. therefore, this is how you slowly left statehood, and divided ukraine for personal interests poroshenko zelensky had a chance to turn everything around , including you. a new person, you have nothing to do with it. something happened, but come on, sit down and think about what is best for your state for your people. well, now you are waging this war. so i specially drew this map for you, right now russia will grind you there manpower and strength and equipment. already those

motivated ideologically minded natsiks who were called nationalists. these strong people are ideologically not there, they have all died already. who is fighting here is already those whom you catch on the streets and bring here, they will not prepared. well, and a little military, they will not cope with this machine. russia has rebuilt. russia is at the front today. the latest weapon already grabs a drone already. well, a completely different army and they are the most dangerous again, i don’t know whether to tell you or not to say they have 250,000, the volunteer corps russia has 250,000, which are volunteers who are now trained and in reserve. 250.000 at the front now the

russians have less. here they are sitting on the defensive, it 's not because they can't attack there's no need, but you go, you understand how chipped and drunk you go to the advantage. as in the movie of the germans shows you go to these barricades but you do not reach. even this we see, and it is so. well, it doesn’t even reach the minefields , you are simply destroyed by the thousands, you have 45.000 during the counter offensive. during this time , forty-five thousand people died in your country and 45,000 left with chops. here they smell the losses you have one in eight. one in 8 losses at the front and 250,000 reserves armed with the latest technology. here they will grind you here, and then they will do what the management is most afraid of. they will cut you off.

here in moldova, in transnistria, they will cut you off, what will you do then, and here, here, the poles are rubbing their hands, pushing the americans. they will cut off the west from you, you will be left with this piece, if you have. that's what will happen to you and the state, as the ukraine of our state with you will not be our native land and my own history. that's what you now do not stop it will be. if you don't sit down at the negotiating table now, russia is proposing that you don't want to? well, if you don't want to, don't. the power of russia is enough and no west to you in this relations will not help, you need to take your head in your hands and act on the basis of realities, but act in the interests of this vast beautiful territory. the west is already beginning

to understand that nothing will happen, even with the help of the west, ukraine will not be able to withstand oleg, and indeed, sooner or later, he will complete his own. with what result for russia with what for ukraine so far it is difficult to imagine alexander grigorievich showed on the map what ukraine can be yes, its remnant, and that's what surprises is the cynicism of ukrainian politicians who are now there in ukraine. they are convinced that sooner or later russia will still have to negotiate something with them. here. what do you think, are they right in their beliefs, but he advised, uh, to listen more to alexander grigorysh , our president, because basically, what is happening now, he predicted everything. he spoke just recently. look, we see that the counteroffensive has completely bogged down. and i also want to recall the words of the president when he spoke about this about the counteroffensive, but then you need to listen to him.

further, what did he say, how will you stop russia then how the west is going to stop russia later , so i agree with my colleague russia militarily no one will defeat and belarus will never be in his life, so they will always bet on blowing us up from the inside , they do not believe themselves in some kind of military way, so the bet will be the twenty-fourth year twenty- fifth year to blow up the elections. again, create some kind of fifth column to somehow destroy everything, and the post-soviet countries and ukrainians must finally understand one simple thing, that no one has ever worried about them in the west and who is interested in ukraine being strong , independent, powerful - this is belarus, russia , this is our neighbor me. so that there would be no war, because my grandmother was born there in odessa. i went there. i know they are our neighbors. i dream that it would be good there and russia wants the same, and the president told them about this all the time , we want peace in ukraine when the ukrainians themselves decide this

together with us. we can agree on everything without an intermediary without these americans to drive. they need to go to hell with europe when they are expelled from europe europe will prosper will the ukrainians be given their own decision? how do you think? is a certain revolutionary mood in society possible, because dissatisfaction with what is happening is increasing every day? well, this is also important. this is so that people get some kind of insight so that there really isn’t such a situation as it is now, then it will strengthen us, frankly speaking, there is no need to apply western curators, even when it's easier for people to believe, uh, in propaganda clichés and pick them up and so on. and when we're only on the exodus. here we see the mobilization that in reality ukrainian society today no longer wants to fight, but in words, if that's how much the curse is still there against me like me. and although, what is most offensive and

rightly said, but also france ladies and here we are, dear colleagues, supported any outcome. in any case, no one will be happy, because every day we all lose together. you they are at war with themselves. by the way, the poles should think 30 times, if they poke their noses, then they will fight with them with everything differently, because they are such a centimeter, because they don’t. and how do russian belarusians have ukrainians there to each other, so that they don’t talk there. and the worst thing is that, when we warned this, and we were the main problems, by the way, together, among other things, with the belarusian president lukashenko , who always advocated that russia compromise. and for what i think, there are many among the russian temple of the patriots who they don’t like, neither medvedchuk, nor our team, not alexander lukashenko that he thinks that it was necessary to go there with tanks back in the fourteenth year, how to crush, uh, and so on there to annex ukraine and something else like that, but in fact they convinced they argued

that a military solution would in any case be a tragedy for everyone, they said that there was another way, they suggested to this huge effort. and therefore, the negotiations were in minsk lukashenka had his own authority, and put the political one in order to convince the then russian leadership, that even with this, even poroshenko, but you can agree. as a result, that if the decisive will of the west had not been behind it all, they agreed agreed and it would have been fulfilled and i what would have been done, but since the most key moment always appeared advisers who said dear petr alekseevich to their edge on stolen billions somewhere as a result, you will run to moscow. you have the wrong one there. in general, you, of course, well done. you, of course, are there, maybe, as you wish better for the countries, but we have other plans. about ukraine is needed, so we will provide this war here anyway. here. i remind you that on the air the program sas is authorized to announce that we are talking about

elections and external players. is the west ready to reset power in ukraine and before we continue our discussion. i would like to draw your attention to the schedule that my colleagues and i have prepared to rely on the sociological data published by the ukrainian media now, of course. they cannot be clearly distorted, both consciously and objectively people. they are just afraid to talk about their real attitude to power, but the other day i came across interesting data polls commissioned by an authoritative publication, conservative sociological group, rating. the questions were formulated. so, we can assume fairly honest answers from ukrainians. here the opinion of ukrainians is divided, who owes whom after the conflict. here we see, 29% believe that the eu will owe ukraine for protecting them from russia again, 56% ukraine will owe after the end of the conflict guys, there is for the assistance and weapons provided. that is to say, ukrainians today already

understand that this assistance is not gratuitous. and for all. will have to pay. yes, yes, but why should ukraine be taken away? what they have taken now is giving the most that they have prices - these are human lives, the land was taken away by enterprises a long time ago they took away the economy, they took away natural resources. who owns the grain, that it belongs to ukrainians arable land. all to some companies that are managed in the west, therefore, unfortunately, the problem of ukraine will be how to return its people. this is the main problem of ukraine, how to return the good to the people, because people are already taking away people's lives, that's just the point, to they took everything, and then they threw it into the war, france is there, but is it possible to return anything to the ukrainian. there is no people left, only the people, and nothing else in ukraine no, but i want to be more meaningful, i want you back. uh, as he says, oleg gaidukevich by the fourteenth year, because everything was thought out so that you

understand, starting from the nineteenth year and ending with the fourteenth in the united states of america and nato well, we nominally say nato is the vassals of the americans by the fourteenth year should have turned, crimea to the largest military base of the united states, hiding behind a nato umbrella, where contracts for the construction of schools, a kindergarten range, have already been concluded. at the same time, they worked there, not ukrainian specialists, brought by american specialists, were restored edge-on and restoring the old soviet catacombs associated with the preservation of the safety of modern naval vessels, primarily the nuclear submarine fleet , went there. greasy work and all this was against the background of the red lines that we spoke

the presence of such a base in the crimea among the americans. this is control over all of europe over all of russia and the almost complete degradation of our future future prospects for the russian federation as a state, and even in these conditions, russia spoke, but did nothing , and thanks to the russian people living in crimea, which russia supported , justice was established, i just was i was a witness, i was a participant, i was a witness to these events, i can fully say about all these things, but look. i wanted to bring us back to the first part of our program. when you they said that the west began to divide, he understands that today it is impossible to win in these conditions, but he must keep some kind of stronghold and do something, he understands that

there must remain a platform from which modern ammunition will start under these conditions when there is a special military operation, and a proxy war declared by russia to nato. we are criticized by our opponents , our patriots, many experts say we are conducting a special military operation, we are not destroying ukraine and sometimes acting illogically. we waiting for the west to open. we have not yet used modern weapons , and i could talk here for days and days a comparative analysis of what we have, what they have , today we have an advantage in everything in training in military-technical equipment tactics, but we understand that today the forces are unequal and our the advantage of our quality and

ability in these conditions, what has the collective west created? look, alexander grigorievich spoke about this more than once today, including the russian president, who spoke more under the guise of an allegedly mythical danger. difficult, says we are making the best army in the world. he did not even hesitate to put in second place, as he believes the american armed forces and they will form on the border. 300.000 while with regard to the baltic states with the capabilities, the restored military infrastructure of the baltic republics of the soviet union, they are able to build up a grouping of 200.000 in three days , while 101 airborne divisions of the united states of america with 400 helicopters are located on the border with ukraine there 6 km on the territory of romania ready at any moment

so to speak, get involved in these things. we understand that today announcing the so -called lightning-fast global strike concept, when they are planning 5,000 precision-guided munitions in conventional equipment. hmm, hit within an hour . russian critical military, uh, important communications and so on, which also nullifies our nuclear. and our military-technical capabilities this is a serious danger even in these conditions with so many weapons, but not a single country, the air defense system is not able to cope this is a big problem, but we understand when it will be. under what conditions and the last security summit, the speeches of the president of the russian federation and the minister of defense and the minister of defense of china were clearly said lord don't joke, the time for jokes is

over. we have something to answer and ending the answer briefly to your question about the future of ukraine, alexander grigoryevich , who said being one of the most experienced world politicians who foresaw a lot of things, he cannot say everything based on from his status and ability. i am a free man, who fought a lot in politics for a long time, i saw a lot, i analyzed it strongly, i want to tell you. we have no other task, and our leadership has spoken about this more than once, except for solving three tasks of a special military operation, the liberation of people living in the southeast, resolving issues where militarization is and resolving issues of denazification of ukraine a. this means that all

these issues will have to be resolved before the border. lviv ivano-frankivsk and other subjects of ukraine associated with, so to speak, with collective west of other options. no, if we make some agreements and repeat some khasavyurt mistakes. tomorrow we will create the most difficult conditions for our union state for the future of our children and great-grandchildren, and this must be remembered. i think that in these conditions all our leaders understand very well little they say, but believe me, how a military man does. everything is correct. western allies of ukraine are tired of the irresponsible behavior of the country's president volodymyr zelensky, the lack of success in the ukrainian army during the counteroffensive and because of the endless corruption, the conflict

in ukraine had a negative impact on the economies of europe and the united states, and it is possible that the unity of the european union will begin to collapse if the ukrainian crisis drags on, in connection with this, western countries began to think about possible peace negotiations. the obscurity of the west. more details in our story, the upcoming presidential elections are not the only problem for the kiev regime. soon, ukraine may lose both financial and political support from the west, and the reason for this is corruption, money laundering scandals in ukraine is known all over the world. it is not for nothing that ukraine is considered one of the most corrupt countries. now this issue worries the west and western partners. kiev must be confident in the correct use of the support of the ukrainians. they know very well that aid from the united states and also europe depends on confidence in them. zelensky must show that corruption is unacceptable. after receiving bribes and theft, at the highest level, became an officially recognized fact, from the west

, heads flew in kiev, a series of resignations and criminal charges, but vladimir zelensky has the situation under control. at least in this, he is trying to convince his western allies. now we have no corruption, because we are all united around our country. many corrupt officials left the country with their money, and we will do our best to keep them there. i am sure that we will overcome this. parallel to this, there are reforms of the anti-corruption system. we have it one of the most powerful in europe, do you believe it? this is a rhetorical question in the west after all financial assistance is decreasing and less and less reaches kiev. in addition, in many european countries and in the united states , presidential elections will soon be held for the ruling koalas. sam has to explain to his voters where the budget money went?

oleg quite rightly noted franz damych that russia has nowhere to retreat behind, moscow but what can we say about the western curators of the zelensky regime because we have noticed both fatigue and total corruption, which ukraine has been fighting

throughout its independence and zelensky's ingratitude that angers many allies, including britain to the united states of america what do you think, eh? whether volodymyr zelensky and we will stay in their chair, perhaps it is beneficial for the west today to change him to a more loyal person. and thus end this conflict. well, to be honest, from this set of characters from the soviet space. there, a person more loyal, uh, to the west, than zelensky. it’s only possible that mrs. tikhanovskaya, because in general she always takes it under her visor, and sits down there when they shake the hand, so, probably, they would gladly put it in ukraine. and because zelensky there, at least sometimes shakes the rights there, they are indignant, they demand something , blames the responsibility for military failures on some kind of insufficient supplies. of the west , tikhanovskaya would probably, by virtue of her surnames, quietly swallow everything, but if it were serious, then the figure of the ukrainian leaders e is not

so significant. i think it's important to put in some emphasis here, first of all, the west is still extremely strong. i think everyone understands this thank god, they understand this. and the leadership of russia, the leadership of the republic of belarus, that , god forbid , for me as a citizen of ukraine it is important that this ends as soon as possible, of course, but, of course, at the same time it would be for politics. i think that a person would like it to end in a stable world. they are just some kind of really khasavyurt or some other even minsk truce, which will be violated, but regardless of this, the cold war will continue, uh, sanctions will continue to put pressure on russia belarus on you a healthy force, which in ukraine is anti-western. they will also be preserved, so no illusions. it can’t be here, and all this cannot be solved by military-technical methods alone, so i, for example, and a non- military person, will say that, for example, i, on the contrary, admire the economic bloc and the government.