the secrets of a good mood, in general

, i came to the crossroads, got to meet amazing people on a holiday, especially when you create it with your own hands for decades , you can already say everyone likes the place according to statistics. this is purely my personal statistics , girls find themselves much more active than activity. in love with our modern world, does your

recognition give you any privileges, absolute honesty and genuine emotions of the heroes of children, you will never deceive only rights and the price of love is it it can be without reciprocal at the moment when they stop feeling love. well, that is, it will be the moment of my my end of a talk show in which famous people answer tricky questions from children. why we swept up to me the social networks were gone you are easy with your children easy with them up to 12 years old. so, when the eldest daughter turned 12, it immediately became very difficult. watch the project 100 questions for adults on the tv channel belarus 24.

and glorifying the chineezer blue to the sky early, which he absorbed in summer. surahs fly up on knives. we are creatures. yes, the shrine vanishes throwing a tire under the skies latitude lakes behind fabrics smile under the sun. look, never. but that gold sandy beer drank from them endlessly sketched not lakes. i am not a tower. here, all the more so, i just want from stress, so that the thieves do not follow the sea, and the lake

here is theirs. do not if, do not forget the heart loves. my name is igor tur. this is my propaganda let's start. the main event of the past week. i 'm sure it's obvious to everyone that alexander lukashenko gave an interview to ukrainian journalist blogger diana panchenko. she was promised 2 more years ago during a big conversation about the real leader keeps his word with regards to the figure. panchenko although it would be more accurate to say a person, despite the fact that she is from ukraine , for example, being with diana and acquaintances, i personally do not consider her not about russian

, not about putin's diana panchenko in my opinion. very much about the ukrainian journalist, but against zelensky against the authorities that are now leading her native ukraine no longer into the abyss, but to destruction against the puppetry of kiev and against the puppeteers in the face of the united states. this definitely does not oblige her to unconditionally support every decision of the kremlin on ukraine, and it is absolutely difficult for her to tell how ukrainian she is with enthusiasm. successes of the russian army at the front, because with all the guilt of the kiev regime, its fellow citizens are dying. i'm a panchenko girl , to put it mildly, not stupid, but any intelligent person and it doesn't matter at all. from which side of the conflict he is and what views he holds , he will not deny that specifically alexander lukashenko has been out of his skin for many years, out of the woods and climbs so that there is no war on the territory of ukraine, nowhere else among the slavs for 2 hours of interview questions were mainly about their own about putin about zelensky , that is, about the war, but the peculiarity of this particular conversation was the sincerity and emotionality

of the president’s answers and the fact that panchenko tried and managed to show lukashenka not only as a president, but also as a person , every true leader is grateful for this colleague - this is a person, and the highest position in any state is not strictly a profession that equalizes each elected president remain people and every strong government relies, including on the human qualities of its leader, this applies to how alexander grigorievich vladimir vladimirovich, their human relationships play a crucial role for the two countries and for the whole region, when putin first told you that he plans to start his own you saw her performance on tv. i am also the first. uh, we never had conversations. right on the eve of hostilities, that the war will begin? the only thing for a few days or there for a day? i do not remember. we had we met at his country residence and

discussed the situation that had developed, he did not verbatim for the first time also told you about this . he tells me, listen, sash, you know this situation, if god forbid something happens, well, we are an ally, of course, allies. if suddenly something happens. eh, what can happen? well, whatever, maybe you. cover me, please. and in the early days of uh in a special military operation. if you remember, i made a statement that we are not getting involved. this conflict, we can do little to help russia and so can handle anyone but shoot the russians in the back. we will not allow. lukashenka many times, he says, russia will cope with anyone, and every time skeptics try to prick alexander grigoryevich, they say. and what then is the war in ukraine going on for so long once again. i repeat the banal thought of war - this is when it is clear from front to front, when all available human resources are thrown into battle, and the enemy is non -stop being beaten from all guns. and i’ll also say it

very cynically, but it seems that the war is true, when civilians are sincerely sorry, but on war, as in a war, their potential death, significantly, does not affect the course of the war in ukraine, russia has not waged and is not waging a war in this way, although in an interview the president will say that russia, in essence , has already fulfilled the goals of a special military operation and ukraine will never be that aggressively nationalistic, then with regard to moscow, in any case , it will be, if it is much more careful, then what happens. there you know for several months. i personally have racks of parallel between today's hostilities with armed conflict that putin had to deal with in his first months of coming to power. i'm talking about the second chechen war, which is already called so today. but then it was called by moscow the counter-terrorist operation. maybe i 'm wrong, but today's own in ukraine and the one who is in chechnya have a lot in common. from what, what began to happen in grozny after the withdrawal of the russian contingent is of great

importance for the realization that what will happen after its own with ukraine is quite obvious that moscow will not wanted, does not want and will never want the exit of kiev and the zone of its influence. worse than this, only the complete transition of kiev into the zone of influence of russia’s direct opponent, the united states , can only mean that the russian president wants to seize ukraine or include it in his country, as for me, no. so, quite once i draw parallels with the second chechen war, it’s still young in grozny. putin did not wave his saber, but completely compromised himself, appointing the head of the republic not conditional ivan ivanov akhmat kadyrov, that is, his goal was precisely a compromise, although he completely had all the tools for the complete subjugation of the territory. it is difficult for chechnya to manage the federation, because it is necessary to keep a reasonable level of federalism in jewelry, the same applies to countries that are part of moscow’s zone of influence. take care of it here, it’s definitely superfluous, so talking about what he wants to absorb, then ukraine, belarus, then who else they are idiotic, because everything works completely wrong, but if putin has

imperial ambitions, alexander lukashenko said, as it is, that there are some imperial manners. i didn't see it, but i think that the heads of large states always burst their chests. i'm really the way a person can think. uh, this also applies to the united states of america, what's wrong russia is a huge empire what is there to say? of course , this leaves its mark on the character of a person. i am categorically proud of the fact that i work alongside a leader who has both the strength and the will to say it the way it is. i will allow myself to supplement alexander grigorievich with my own fabrications. any superpower, by definition, has imperial ambitions. this is the whole essence of its existence and only such a model of foreign policy. it is possible for hegemons to aggressively defend their zones of influence, which is not the same as territory. and yes, aggressively trying to involve

more and more new countries in its zone of influence, which is completely different from including new territories in its composition, this is what russia is doing, this is being done in the usa and china this is being done to a greater or lesser extent in germany and france in a little greater degree. turkey is doing it now. why are you trying to do it? even more than all world politics is built distance of different imperial ambitions if suddenly the imperial ambitions of a superpower are abandoned, it ceases to be a superpower, and then it completely disintegrates, an example of this by itself, the soviet union let me dream up. now, if we imagine that the russian federation will successfully realize its imperial ambitions, including its zone of influence, more and more countries. someday the same country will end true. hypothetical, as soon as the entire planet is in the zone of influence of the russian federation, then russia will immediately cease to be a geemon, not being able to realize behemoth’s political aggression, because there are no those left to whom this aggression can be directed, and this will immediately lead to the collapse of russia, because every hygin he

ceases to gigabanize , the concept of enslaving the whole world is deliberately disintegrating, wrong, because if successful, it leads to the self-destruction of the enslaver. but on this path exactly entered the washingtons. now we are seeing the consequences for them. the american empire is falling apart and view of the collapse of the united states to you . this thought will seem bold, but this is not about the coming years, but about the putin decade the person is definitely categorically smart, cunning and at the same time trained, but he is also a person. i can't say there in detail. uh, but what he's going through. uh, in connection with these events, the situation. not easy, like a person absolutely adequate, experienced, who really analyzes, tries to look ahead , calculates his life, he was such a person, consider a military man, and he had a life and work where it was necessary to calculate a lot in advance. he does calculate, but he never, i'm sure, never calculated that

here it is necessary to enslave someone there, then ukraine , then belarus, which is something nonsense, you know, i have recently had my free time. i'm trying to study history. i have my own view of the man putin because his fate, which shaped him. character and life value still strongly influence the whole world, including belarus, for me the cornerstone of his biography is my year of birth 1989 by the time, as vladimir vladimirovich himself said in an interview, everyone in moscow had already ignored warnings and reports from east germany, which was written from there by a kgb lieutenant colonel with an operational pseudonym platov, because in moscow they were busy with some kind of internal intrigues and when in the gdr, after the fall of the berlin wall, both soviet civilian and soviet military men and the entire soviet intelligence network were in danger germany, both eastern and western, that is, dresden , which was in the zone of influence. the union called moscow for help, and putin himself called, but moscow was silent, i will quote the russian

president, it became clear that the union was sick. and this a deadly, incurable disease called paralysis, paralysis of power, a paralyzed and dying hegemon, left the country of his zone of influence to the mercy of fate. that is, he left in trouble. for a kgb officer to leave his country for his own, this is the height of dishonor, after 2 years putin will submit a resignation report. it seems to me that those events in the life of the russian leader have a very strong influence on the foreign policy of russia under putin. russia does not try to involve so many countries in its zone of influence so as not to be able to guarantee their support in any situation, so that already some other intelligence officer did not call from conditional damascus to moscow a. moscow would not respond without being able to come to the rescue. imperial ambitions are thus limited by putin's enduring human desire to be in charge of countries. partners. ukraine as a state and zones of influence to moscow has long since left, but part of the territory of ukraine remained in the zone of influence of moscow and this is the donbass situation in ukraine -

this is not imperial ambition. the responsibility of a man and an officer of putin for those people whom moscow promised not to leave in trouble, do not give up other methods. they were not, except for the introduction of troops, and he could not leave his own . lukashenka said that putin was worried. for all events, i am sure that this is the way it is. perhaps this was not the warriors, if another, vladimir, also experienced. here is my first conversation, when zelensky spoke on the phone the first days of the war. we talked with him for a long time, he was dusting there, he was dusting something. i say, you know, we all would not argue on the phone, but remember the war in your state. not today, tomorrow they will ask you, why is it going on in your land your nations, to understand the situation, it is worth adding that another vladimir is already inside russia. of course, there are those who criticize him for the deaths of people in ukraine, but there would be even more critics

. had it not started with a war in his country and he would have been responsible for it, and this dramatically increases the likelihood of the biggest problem. both for russia and for any post-soviet country , it is customary to say that in russia there are two troubles, this fools are expensive in politics. i think two the main troubles in russia are the following is the lack of strong power. and even worse two authorities. and now in my opinion. the main fragment of lukashenka's interview i saw everything that was happening was related to these events. everything started. unfortunately, the war has nothing to eat with leonid. it would start if poroshenko and not zelensky were president. you know, uh. here i am, uh, volodya zelensky is often criticized. yes, his inexperience. this is some kind of expressive character. uh, you know what he's always been up to. it played a role, but troubles. i did not say in vain, they they started that if they were danilycha. when

there was no definite course, we will do it here and there, and i remember how, uh, boris nikolaevich, the referendum of the constitution was brought , uh, we met. hey, we're sitting together. eh, laziness further began to say something about ukraine and yeltsin listen. well, help. you give him a normal constitution to hold a referendum. i say, well, seriously, i'm ready to connect this discord. uh, as it is now in ukraine or then it would not have happened. well, time went by damn, didn't actually make the constitution ready actually accepted. yes, he is popular with another meeting. i am yeltsin speaking. well, he doesn't want to do anything there according to this constitution. and why? she says she is glad not to approve this constitution from there. it all started with kushma

, then, uh, yushchenko, then yanukovych, everything, uh, everything, it accumulated and on an inexperienced, absolutely non-politician person. well , zelensky’s novolud is alien to this policy, everything fell down there. why did the soviet union collapse because the problem of the lack of strong power immediately appeared, and then a worse problem, that is, dual power, when in moscow has had two legitimate presidents. gorbachev as the head of the ussr and yeltsin as the head of the russian federation. today, just the day when the august 1991 ended , as a result of which the apparent problem, the two powers in russia were resolved, then yeltsin and those who stood behind him began to solve these problems of the lack of strong power. all. again it led to two governments with parliament and an event for 93 years and shooting from tanks. the white house, now all events are evaluated differently, as well as the figure, or rather the personality of bo. nikolaevich but the main thing he and they sought this absence of two powers

and the establishment of a single strong power in the country. only in this way can our countries develop effectively. what is really there, the young president lukashenko in the ninety-fifth, he solved exactly the same problem, the elimination of two authorities in belarus, so that the country would not be mired in the confrontation between the head of state and the supreme council, then alexander grigorievich set about eliminating the problem of the lack of strong power in the country and he shot her strong and in my opinion. now lukashenka is for the future and the lack of power is trying to insure the country from precisely these two main troubles. and even worse two authorities in the nineties. none of the post-soviet countries had any idea what was being done to a democracy that suddenly fell on its head, adding the problem of the lack of a strong government. we decided very much. it's just that they gave power to a third party in poland, with all the talk about democracy, they were able to build a cost to recognize the power as strong and dictatorial. is it true. this is the strong power of the americans in poland and not the poles nazarbayev kazakhstan also established a strong power aliyev established strong power in azerbaijan

, and there was strong power in some other union republics, while in others there was either a lack of strong power, or even dual power. and this is armenia, georgia and, of course, this is ukraine in any management model, that a team, an enterprise, that a country should always be one person or one force that makes the final decision, which is not subject to appeal; everything else is chatter about some kind of democracy, but completely non-working in life with the last word can possess president of ukraine kuchma the ukrainian rada may have the last words it doesn’t matter who, but when the president cannot pursue his policy, because any of his decisions can block the parliament, and the parliament, in turn, cannot pursue its own policy, because any decision can be hindered the president. this is the actual two power in the country, which is the absence of power. as such, that is, without power, there is less demand from kravchuk, but kuchma yushchenko yanukovych poroshenko zelensky under many of the presidents. the country had actually two power, or even three powers, if you add the oligarchs, or even four powers, if

you add the puppeteers of the west and none of them could give their ukraine strong power , presidential parliamentary parliamentary-presidential dictatorial authoritarian oligarchic, it doesn’t matter. what kind of power can be good or bad, but monstrously without power, this led ukraine to war and will stop the war for ukraine. the first solution to the problem of dual power and the second establishment of a strong government in the country. that's all politics. my name is igor tur. it was my propaganda what secrets do the greatest shrines of christianity hide all the churches, that is, the shrines on the territory of the grand duchy of lithuania on the territory of the sujas and so on in belarus. what were the names of st. michal arkhan? i mean, it's like that. well, i

don't think that in spiritual terms it can be a coincidence, does the name affect the character and destiny of a person, that is, are you having competitiveness? why does the bible call to be joyful sometimes earthly joy, bodily joy, it is like that, sometimes it passes very quickly, and the joy that a person from communion with god in the church, then this is the joy of it well, somehow it turns out that fills every day of his life. why do they ring bells in churches, it is known that bells are a tradition of ringing yes, it was the form of bells that came to us more western, as it were, traditions from the catholic, because in the orthodox, as it were, execution. it was called a beat, from which they also beat plates from the same with e, departure materials, but they beat the answers to these and other questions in spiritual educational projects on the

belarus 24 tv channel every week, the heroes of the project go in search of adventure. do not be surprised at the next task brought me here to the forest happiness, and they do not even guess. where will their fate take them this time. today you are leaving. in osipovich this is the same, mogilev region. imagine how historical this city is for the first time in written sources. he is mentioned on february 25, 1993. we explore together with them, interesting places and sights of belarus were located on this hill, from which a stunning view opens up. it is here that two rivers, svisloch and berezina is god's chair. and it grants wishes. someone sees on the stone. the face of the mother of god with the baby, and someone cross, watch the program stone,

paper scissors on our tv channel.

hello lyudmila kozak is on the air with you in this evening newscast. and security issues are all orders of the president.