and there 105 less weight 110 less weight. this working weight was from 100 kg and above. then with the bench press, i had 90, too, this is not necessary. i was in that is, i pumped here the upper shoulder girdle. i would have become a clamped muscle, crushed, so i used my lungs so wide, i ruined the run with the same then we ran endlessly from the portage, eat 10 kg, damn it, then you also go lunges with a barbell there under 30 m, i don’t remember any more weight 30-40 kg, 30 m each. you walk plus weights. there on the beach all rubber dumbbells, but that's all, in short, a lot of strength work, a lot of these 1092. you know, you did an incredible thing, because, well, not every day, and belarus, uh, definitely wins in the world. and why do i say unconditionally, because 100 m, starting from school, probably, almost every person runs, uh,

competition. here we are just the highest and you win and well, i will not overdo it. eh, you can definitely say that. here is everyone who saw this race, that you united the whole country in a single impulse. eh, here we are today a lot philosophized. you don't know, maybe you yourself have come to the conclusion that this is your mission here in this life. uh, this white lightning, so that she, uh, explained the country ran in 11 seconds and just did incredibly what is impossible to do. well , probably no one here is such a short time. and yes, again, this is what i feel now, here tears are welling up, of course, simply from what you say and ask this question. you said the right words. what is it, perhaps, the mission to unite people? yes, you can

call it that, only it was even 100 meters preparation for this mission, that is, my whole life path. i do not want to say the word mission for me, it is somehow a little bit like that. here is some kind of high no, well, we each chose here to fulfill our role. they are predetermined, we are filmed, we just live it through ourselves, we feel these roles are everything, that is, i just know my role a little, i see it, that is, from childhood. i see that i will live and the olympic games , including and perhaps, my role yes, to unite and perhaps, how i feel about it, and how i saw her say something to say something to people, but that's the olympic games. here is the sports path. it was preparation. that is

, i had to get stronger in spirit there. this is very important. this is the most important core - it is the strength of the spirit. then i had such a social life, such a social life, that is, i didn’t live with myself at all, that is, i gave so simply and now i understand. well, it's just that i even called it such small lessons of love then, that is, my name was, i was driving. all they had was just talking about their experience, saying that feelings i feel nothing more do not need to do. i never asked for anything in return for this, i was happy that i could just bring joy to someone, right at this moment, that is, i tried not to refuse as much as possible. and it really is. i studied in such unconditional love, in general , it’s just that it doesn’t matter just to love, a child, there is an adult, there is a combiner teacher, wherever i’ve been, with whomever, well, no matter how i communicate, then i had

a church course for more than ten somewhere years. that is the church life. this is love for god worship god serving god praising god, that also fed me. it also prepared me. and here's well, here's some even deeper role, and again, this one is still then transformational, this one, again, to live through the crisis yourself, you understand? do not read in books, do not listen to someone there, but live to feel what happens to a person when you are completely crushed by everything, you died. you, as a person, have died, and you don’t know how everything in this world does not exist for you, and you must build or find the world yourself another world, it is a pure world. he blissful, he is harmonious, he is, but he is inside. only not outside, it is not there, these are futile attempts. to find, this short-term pleasure is nothing more, and

after pleasure there will always be suffering necessarily. that's it, that's it , that's it, that's all in total. here it brings some. here are some of my main important roles, that is, to speak, but i still don’t know what i should say. i'm just again, when i'm invited somewhere. i just enjoy and rejoice when i see a large, let's say mass people, here they are united by one goal, they are joyful, they glow. that is, i just thank god for the opportunity to be here in this, that is, to give this to receive here. i don't want anything from my mind. that is. well, i'm not striving, here's something to say, that is, i don't have. i do not speak through social networks there publicity, yes, but if something appears, well, that's how you insisted, yes, let's say, okay? i try

to speak now of life, yes, and here i just say what i feel and what i know, but this knowledge is lived by me. i know this is how it really is. if we talk about harmony, you intend to give to people to give, that is. well, i sincerely believe, again through my feelings, that a person is as happy as possible. only when he gives gifts do we like to accept, and then, when we grow up , is it more fun when you give them? yes, i understand, i'm talking about worldly things. when i was preparing and i don’t remember for a long time, when i looked at social networks there were, uh, photos of yulia nesterenko, in my opinion. something you really are you understand, there are feeders of all sorts of feeders or it's so easy to know the instagram photo. well, first of all, uh, how do you say? social networks already? well, not anymore, i have there, that is, i have a page, it is completely empty. i only come in when i'm interested in something,

for example, to see how my friend painted some, let's say a new picture. i have another opportunity, for example, no, i don’t tell anything about myself anywhere. not in general, i have not exhibited for the last two years. i don't have hmm no need for social media needs. here, and about fishing. well, just like my husband rybak, i carry shells and bring shells, so i have to figure out bait. i know that there lin crucian loves, there martin carps, they love sweet or fishy smells there. well, in general, well, i have to know. yes, of course, we are participating in our teams such a tandem duet. just about a month ago, we took part in a major tournament called bulbash, where some of the best teams compete. belarus

for carp fishing. we took third place. listen well man i took bronze in carp fishing. i wanted to ask the next question . well, don't the fragile girl try to stick a worm on a hook, but i understand that the question is stupid. ah, you are right about that. anything, that is, does not scare me. it's been raining for two days there, no bathing, be patient there, there's cold heat there everything i endure, but i won't put on a maggot, and i'm not wearing a worm, a worm either. and yet football today will be in a sports car. it so happened that yulia nesterenko plunged into the number one game. no , she does not teach children how to hit the ball correctly. she teaches us how to run correctly and asserts with this component that our players, big and small, have huge problems. modern football requires specialists with a narrow focus. it has long been no secret

that fitness coaches are needed. and we also need a separate athletics coach, nesterenko notes her revelation from working with children in the second part of the interview right now. i would like these revelations to become a call to action for the leaders of our football. after the end of a career. uh, well, everyone knows the whole country knows that yulia sirenko touched with belarusian football. we kind of talked. uh, yulia nesterenko taught athletics. let's just say that the movement was slightly corrected by the players. uh, just like football is the number one game and a person from the outside looked at our football players. and among the fact that well, not everything, the guys get it, especially lately. uh, here are some tips, what kind of footballers do they need to do in childhood? than they, maybe they are doing something, not that, but somehow it is necessary just not that they are lazy. and the fact that they teach them wrong. here i will be happy to share what i felt, what i saw, what

i encountered in our children's football. well , of course, the technique ran in general. there is simply no anti-running technique there, and many football coaches have this. there is an expression that there is a football run. and if you want to not, run it in africa run. that is , when i watch football, for example, the world cup or the champions league. sprinters run cool powerful runs there. you see , and, of course, it is not the children who are absolutely to blame. well, it's not at all to blame that they are not taught to run. they run on their heels, all with their hands, in general, no hands at all do not help, that is. the movement of the legs depends on the movement of the arms. this is biomechanics. that is, if the hands do not work, then, well, the hips will not

rise, that is, they run, it turns out that you know how the legs are tied. here are a lot of these different, of course, errors. eh, technical points, we set the running technique, and it is absolutely not difficult, in general, children give in, generally better. that's how old i started. how old were they 10-11 years old? well, six months later whether he comes or not new people are absolutely absolutely different in general. well, that is all our work. here it is visible to the naked eye. it’s not necessary to be a professional coach there, that’s all, well, to see, that is, when the movements are clamped down, such short steps are generally held down, that is, and then, when it opens wide, when there is the concept of performance, that is, a 15 -year-old guy who is already half serving no. here, well, adults are, of course, harder. well, of course, the person is already heavier

formed. i mean, i had the opportunity. mm invitation, coach of the seventh. i did a few hand workouts. eh, and that is, here i specifically gave absolutely elementary exercises. how discoordinated are the players? it just was. well, here, this is a laugh training, they laughed at themselves, because how much they carry. he does everything, take the ball from them. and it's just wooden pinocchio and the leg of the same name with a hand. that is, that is, it was supposed to automaton natural movements. naturally, they are missing. yes, well, if from this particular approach to the general, that is, i will add more, that is, in children's football. well, here is the technical point, it is desirable to put the running technique, then here it is, under uh, there are very few mobile joints in general, that is, elasticity, mobility, joint

flexibility. that is. well, it's like to say, it's such a margin of safety. but it's like injury prevention. that is, you have this longevity in your sport. you see, if from these particulars, let's say it comes to the general, it is obvious that, well, here are the coaches who work for us in football. mostly. it's well, former footballers and players. i don't know how to properly stop the ball diagonally. otherwise, uh, we don't have, uh, a fitness coach on every team . here it is separately. i think this is where it should be. uh, it is there that physical training, football, and if possible, a coach should be invited. here in athletics, athletics. this is the base. this is the foundation, running. walking jumps - it's elementary you know? that is, if a football player graduated from our academy there, and i wanted to enter and he could not jump from

places, that is, mine was taught to jump from a place. it just surprises me, if there is an opportunity, that is, i turn to the coaches. there, to the leaders of the academy, invite the usual master of sports in athletics. does he know how to do it and do you know what is needed? how to fix mistakes. hmm , he can do the same. i saw how football players work, uh, in the gym with a neck and a barbell. well, excuse me, that is, again, the coach needs to come, if he does not want to call the coach, to show, he must come to the coach himself. uh, heavy and learn to do the exercises yourself correctly and only then give it to the children, you know? well, taking this opportunity since the olympic champion. we have and she has windows somewhere in the work schedule, you can invite yes her. yes, i

'm happy to answer. at the invitation, that is, i like to communicate with those people who know, understand what is needed, want, that is, everything, i am a lot in the field of football no, that is, who understand and want to take something a little from athletics. unfortunately few. good, then. we smoothly move on to today's everyday life of yulia nesterenko, what she does. e her, i don’t know work, well , we talked about hobbies about the inner world, we talked. on mundane i work as a head coach. uh, in the sports team of the border guard agencies, i am responsible for the discipline of the sports team for sports results. well, for educational work. well, i help, i am interested in the problems of the worries of athletes, athletes, military personnel and in every possible way at my level i help as much as possible

in organizing the training process in order to they showed their results to the maximum for the benefit of our country. that's clear. so we talked about the fact that yulia nesterenko is afraid of a worm, but it’s interesting to have fish at home, she doesn’t clean it. but no, as a hostess in general, in general, i’ll immediately say fish. i don’t clean, so rybak dima rybak caught it, cleaned it, i’ll do the rest. that's it, i somehow started with us that from the first day of our life together they clean fish, only dima is a professional athlete - this is, as usual , a restriction that has been in place since childhood, and you get used to a certain diet from childhood i don’t know something for these there, the last decades have changed in this regard, i eat what i want, or is it habits. and it's second nature, and they won't let go. well, it's just that when i was an athlete, my whole being, everything was in sports. and that is,

let's say, like a family, there the husband is ready. everything was in the background and only when i had already left the sport. someone quietly quietly, how to say, i stopped. that's just an ordinary woman, just a hostess there. usually that's last year. i dashed off for the first time, cucumbers, tomatoes. dima said this year to roll up twice more, because he liked it. he liked it. yes, in general, only now i am discovering it for myself. i feel like this is how it should be. it's just women, just simply cooking, cleaning , planting, growing, rolling up something. ordinary same female. this is what i feel now. and that's all for today, the news agency is presenting a project sports frame for belarus 5 in a week we will go on air in

the usual format. see you. hello on the air program sasha is authorized to declare i am its host nadezhda sas i greet you and remind you that this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes , events, people will affect the life of everyone from the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. let's tell you right now, us president joe biden was seriously criticized for his sluggish response to large-scale fires on the hawaiian island of maui, which claimed the lives of more than 100 americans

for several days, while on vacation, biden ignored the topic, then promised that affected families would receive compensation in the amount of only $ 700, and on tuesday, when asked what he could say about the record victims, he answered. i have nothing to add smiled and left the opponents. they could not pass by this and accused the baidan of indifference to their suffering. meanwhile , biden's main rival donald trump , the us law enforcement system does not get tired of making new accusations. so a georgia state grand jury indicted trump and a group of 18 people in connection with the attempts. cancel the results of the 2020 election, which the former president believes falsified are now indicted on 13 counts. these include violating georgia's anti-racketeering and corruption law inciting to violate the oath of public officials

conspiring to forge and filing false documents among allies, trump, who is indicted by his lawyer rudy giuliani , former white house chief mark meadows and several advisers . the billionaire himself believes that the presentation of new charges against him is directly related to the election campaign in country chief of staff. the correct nato secretary suggested that ukraine would be able to get membership in the alliance in exchange for parts of the territory about it. he told during the debate that the norwegian city was rented in his opinion, this could be part of the end of the conflict, at the same time, he recalled the words of his head of the general secretary, jens stoltenberg, that ukraine should decide for itself when and under what conditions it wants to negotiate according to him according to the discussion of the possible membership of ukraine in nato after the conflict, goes and in the course of the discussion there are options that provide for territorial concessions. kiev i'm not saying that it should be, but

it could be a possible solution explained the politician. well, today in our program we will talk about ukraine about the future of ukraine to the famous german chancellor. otto von bismarck is credited with such words never lie so much as after the hunt during the war and before the elections, to say nothing of the elections during the war. here , there are no limits to the lies of manipulation, by definition, and it is in this way that the authorities are going to direct the already long-suffering ukraine about why in kiev they suddenly began to actively prepare for the elections. and what does this mean for the course of the conflict? today's program will be discussed . oleg idukevich, deputy of the house of representatives of the national assembly of the republic of belarus, will help me understand this topic . hello, chairmen of the liberal democratic party of belarus. good afternoon today in the studio with us oleg voloshin, deputy of the verkhovna rada of ukraine of the 9th convocation , another member of the movement, ukraine hello oleg hello and glad to welcome you to our

studio france damovich klintsevich, military expert and leader of the russians. hello afghan veterans union. thank you very much for traditionally starting our program with us today with a quick question, which is addressed to each participant in today's discussion of elections in ukraine under conditions of war. is it incredible enough to be true oleg the events of the political life of ukraine have, in my own personal memory, uh, always pushed the limits of what can be considered incredible and even because what is happening today i think of all those present still a few years ago, and a nightmare could not have imagined, so what zelensky company in order to maintain power. it's the only thing that works for me. eh, it's moving. uh, ready to do the seemingly impossible under normal election conditions, uh under many actions. and i think it is quite possible that france is there, please, this is a continuous election in these

conditions, it is impossible to hold and no one can participate in them. it won’t work, you can’t get an objective assessment of too many losses and huge difficulties that ukraine is experiencing today the number of errors and miscalculations. and most importantly, the loss of full state sovereignty and dependence on the united states of america and the collective west will not be given to ukrainians. well, no chance to support. uh, comrade zelensky who, as he says, we are all comrades here. oleg elections in ukraine yes , there is no point in these elections, because there was no choice in ukraine already. i don't remember. how many years of real democracy, because there are candidates who would stand, for example, for normal relations with russia, they can simply be destroyed in any way, especially the fourteenth year , the second moment, but uh, ukraine has lost

sovereignty zelensky does not solve anything. biden will give the command. will hold elections will not give the command will not hold elections. for what purpose, uh, or to geneticize zelensky and them. what difference does it make to be legitimate on it, legitimate in terms of what is happening there, they are completely controlled by the people, they do not decide anything. uh, in fact, this territory is a tool for resolving issues in the united states of america, so this election makes sense. uh, so far i don't see any, but no need to be surprised. thank you, it is important to note that the blind desire to simply break away from russia, which replaced the desire to become a truly independent state, turned ukraine into not even the fifty-first state of the united states. what does washington care about a large-scale system? today, ukraine is just a tool against moscow, a platform for earning in the price of an outflow of texation office, either the fate of the earth is like that, or the serf mentality makes itself felt, or maybe the hopeless life in anticipation of the real owner led to such dire consequences. oleg i know

that you maintain communication relationships with certain colleagues of yours who are now in ukraine. but indeed, the formation of certain political alliances is already being discussed , headquarters are being set up, and new political projects are being created. is it possible that once again the ukrainian authorities will be able to cheat the ukrainian people. well, as alexander sergeevich pushkin wrote, to whom, unfortunately, monuments are being demolished in my homeland and forbidding its study in schools of that it is not difficult to deceive, who is glad to be deceived. i would, despite the fact that we love to say everything there, each in his own country. it's about the wise belarusian people, the wise russian people, the wise ukrainian people. this, as it were , always sounds beautifully pretentious in fact. the situation that exists there, if something globally does not suit someone, this is always the result. and the way she ordered, if not all, of course, then some kind of majority, at least in the nineteenth year and here with

her respected belarusian colleagues, did not i agree, the election of mr. zelensky was the result of an absolutely sincere expression of will, people wanted to simultaneously expel all the elite that they thought they were sincere to steal there, and so on and so on and so on. there, they listen to either washington or moscow. and it ’s not clear to choose which actor they believed in the series, uh, who are the president, who supposedly ride a bicycle. and there, from machine guns, he shoots those who exploded there. karkhov got what ukrainians got now continue to stubbornly believe. unfortunately, one hundred percent of those shot down the missiles that the ukrainian air defense there shoot down more than the russians launch, and the west is also capable of direct defense there. and at least, uh, in parallel with this action, there is severe censorship and repression, when those who understand that they are trying to sell some nonsense cannot express their opinion. actually, that’s why i’m in minsk now, for example, not in kiev because i’m located, but today in kiev where i have arrests in absentia and a criminal case on charges of

promoting pro-russian narratives to the verkhovna rada, which, of course, is wildness, because that any constitution of any country, and the deputy say the tribune has the right to say anything , except for direct insults, such as another colleague. that is, i could have been firing at the verkhovna rada to say that i believe that it is necessary to restore the soviet union there in ukraine or become part of the commonwealth speech , this is a matter of evaluating any ukrainian politician who currently has criminal prosecution in ukraine . you into the category of adequate people who understand why i want to do all this, what to exclude from what is twitchy k unfortunately, suffering from fighting from poverty from e, loss of prospects from the fact that the mobilization of people is enough on the street and so on. people will want to once again believe in some kind of fairy tale, it exists and i think, we'll talk about this in more detail, even for some kind of polyproct that appears when artificially. suddenly , some kind of positioner is being constructed and yesterday's man, who received money from zelensky, is also an arrest officer. and people start

to trust him some part of it to talk about the fact that, unfortunately, unfortunately, until now the ukrainians have not got rid of it, but from faith, as in our anthem, it is said to shift our expressions hassan the sun. yes, this is an absolutely mythological worldview, that at the same time , without making any effort, you can defeat everyone and become happy and rich, like mmm. you know, here it is, unfortunately, instantly spread among the part of the ukrainians, who are suppressed. steel is the thinking minority that always said, guys it won't be like this, it can't be necessary take into account the interests of the great powers, you need to take into account our geographical position , whether you like it or not, russia is always our neighbor. this is a common history, this is just a great power and so on. thank you very much, france there, that you are a person so experienced, so the politics of me so called and you are fine. remember the whole history of independent ukraine, at what point, in your opinion, happened, that notorious turn to me there, because at the moment

there are still unsinkable in the ukrainian political elite political figures such as petro poroshenko and yulia tymoshenko, who sat in the shadows for quite a long time after the start of the special military operation , remained silent. and now they began to enter the political arena demanding the resignation of zelensky to overthrow the regime. what do you think, if these political figures have a future? there is no future for these political figures, there is no doubt about it, but you have asked an extremely deep and meaningful question. and i, unfortunately, will try to be brief, but it is very difficult to answer it briefly, because many, probably, here even among the seated competent people. in this studio, those who are not aware , for example, that the movement of hands that became nationalistic was once created at the direction of the ussr state security committee with an indication of ukraine supposedly to resolve some issues. i

was recently at the birthday party of a very respected here, colonel-general of the smolensk region. he told me that when he was with his wife, already being the commander of an anti-aircraft missile regiment, he served in leo. he says that the ninety-first year passed, these changes in the separation associated with a state act that did not exist at all, and then gorbachev did not give the state security committee , did not give the communist party, did not show power in the teeth, and in the ninety -second year in january, as soon as it happened to him . representatives of the state security committee of ukraine also came and said, “comrade colonel, we have analyzed some of your historical events, your father. the captain of the smersh on

the territory of the lviv region destroyed bandera and our great past ninety-second year you are an unwanted element in our country. here the wife can serve. and you, please in the century. imagine the ninety-second year, which means for this period, taking into account our history, why do i always say that gorbachev yeltsin shushkevich and kravchuk are traitors to our country and the destroyers of our great motherland, and i will never refuse these words. no matter how liberal democratic some important processes no one hides behind, but today, in the conditions in which we find ourselves for long period.

the influence on ukraine was colossal, it was so colossal that then kravchuk was persuaded and said that it was necessary to give nuclear weapons, because they did not want them to spread by and large in the three republics of russia, ukraine and belarus, there were nuclear weapons and the americans already thought and understood. and, when we are talking about the 21st century, this is the century of the creation of a special type of military operations , information and psychological operations, and in these information and psychological operations today, from what is happening firmware of the ukrainian people, the reformatization of consciousness, it is colossal, but today, listen, they often scold me, they say, but they have achieved such great success that they managed to turn 90% of the population of ukraine on us, however, there are many of your specialists who are deeply immersed. and you can probably support me. they know that

many, well, do not sincerely say others have a different opinion, but nonetheless. this firmware happened very seriously and in these conditions they no longer understand. well, every day they drip, but they do not understand that there is a disposal most of the russian. the world of a large part of kievan rus and i, yes, i would also like to remind you why today we do not hear the voices of ordinary ukrainians, because by the beginning of 2021 zelensky had completed a complete transformation from a naive and inexperienced newcomer, ready, as he said, to give up power for the sake of bringing peace on ukrainian soil to working in close conjunction with the most radical russophobes in london in washington politics how the opposition was liquidated in ukraine under the sound of war, objectionable party authorities were banned established an information monopoly of power.

recall in our story with the coming to power of vladimir zelensky, many ukrainian journalists are ordinary citizens. they were able to finally get rid of illusions in a democratic society and freedom of the media in the country, it was he who, by his decree, closed the largest positional tv channels. and despite the fact that the decision clearly violated ukrainian law, he challenged it in court. it never succeeded curiously that in the months leading up to the closing, zelenskiy's opinion was the opposite. i really respect every channel. i have never closed a single channel in my life, i am personally for freedom of speech and you know it very well, i will never close any channels in my life i have no right i have no authority to censor. strengthened after the start of zelensky’s office with the help of the largest media holdings, launched a single news tele-marathon, at which leading experts actively promote not only the president, but also his entire team, reporting on successes at the front, in fact, the telethon

has become the only source for a significant part of ukrainians socio-political news, which is undoubtedly beneficial for zelensky to his team. and those who held a different opinion. they just removed them from the air, so it happened from the channel of petro poroshenko they were turned off. after the ex-president of ukraine refused to participate in the marathon, the adviser to the head of the presidential office, mykha podolyak, explained the decision by the excessive narcissism of the former head of state in practice. it's just another way to set your monopoly in the wake. political parties have also been hit by the media. zelensky closed everything political associations, the course of which could at least slightly diverge from that adopted in the country. first of all. this affected all parties with a couple of russian views , the national security council of ukraine decided to suspend any activity of a number of political parties, and the ministry of justice was instructed to immediately ensure the cessation of the activities of these political forces, according to many experts. everything, this is undoubtedly

connected with the upcoming presidential and parliamentary elections in ukraine. see, what kind of elections in ukraine who hates russia more these are the elections they want us to hold now, returning from the nineteenth year, why do i think that there were no elections even then. here is a politician who is independent. therefore, there are criminal cases against him, because he defended the national interests of ukraine in ukraine, there has always been an illusion of elections, like poland will now have elections. what difference does it make who wins duda or not, and those and those about the american forces will not change anything. they will argue whether abortions or no, lgbt more less nationalism more and less, but the essence of polish politics will not change. in ukraine, everything is the same. only it was a little more difficult before, but before the elections, everyone saw his zelensky who stood behind him. why ukraine was under external control from all this, who appointed the us ambassador who was in kiev, no official could

be appointed without actually agreeing with the administration of uh, the united states of america is an independent state. therefore, the elections they were always purged of those political forces that would actually be for an independent ukraine at the beginning of their souls or slowly, but they were not allowed to take part in serious political processes. and if medvedchuk had never won, they would not have let him win, just as they will never let him defeat marilya pan in france , they will never let him win, as long as the winner was tnt for germany, uh, in germany they even want to ban them now. that's what european democracy and american we control you. here is the illusion of elections of two or three candidates. and now in ukraine it will be even worse the next elections will allow those who will compete who hates russia more poroshenko will come out will tell i will this is how it will go out to fight, zelensky is there, anyone, who is still standing there, but they can still make thinner they can release to the political arena, a politician who, perhaps, will

allow himself to say something different. but again, i doubt very much that such politicians as our friend is standing in the studio will be allowed to participate in the elections. but if they allowed they won, why did they ban someone boobs, that they are afraid anyway and 10% will remind our respected viewers of the rating of political parties in ukraine on the eve of svu, this is february 2022. quite right , sociologists found out that ukrainians would like volodymyr zelensky and the servants of the people to continue to lead the country after the next elections. and now, in addition to this schedule , there was another survey conducted by 17% of respondents. they answered yes to question a 57. we would not like such a development of events, and now we see the rating of political parties, the servant of the people has 11.5% that is, after

a certain number , in fact, a few years have passed since the parliamentary elections, the situation has changed. naturally, if it were not for the special, military operation, the rating of zelensky and his retinue would be zero oleg yes, well, first of all, i would like to say, therefore this is already a year after all tv channels were closed. and why were they closed at all, in principle, because representatives of our party, and moreover, not only on the members of the faction there, but also just there, a political scientist who shared our views was denied access to everything other channels. that is, they simply removed us from the information field and still life, yes, and we still, by the way, are in third place here. but i fundamentally agree with my respected namesake in that and if we took the schedule, e.g. sociology for january, 21, february 2 were closed, the tv channels were absolutely lawless, and after mi6 and the state department gave they said the go-ahead, we'll cover you up. this is the version of the information, which is almost on their command. it was generally done. and so. uh, we had first rating in the country, what do you

fundamentally agree with? as soon as here we are some colleagues. well, discussions, especially there in russia. here you are with medvedchuk koma, you lost everything, that we lost, we had the most popular media holding. we had the first rated game. we won the local elections in 1920 and formed the largest faction in the entire southeast in all regional councils where it was possible. and then , during a visit to london, mr. zelensky goes to reacher namur, the head of mi-6 from intelligence unprecedented. that is, i can’t even imagine all this in a nightmare. yes, so that, for example, x lukashenka would not just receive him. yes, there is the head of the intelligence officer of some structure of the friendly side. there is russia or a whale. and during the visit i went to his building. there , more than one self-respecting leader does not act like this for a briefing, and then he went there and he was there, that he himself get out of there. he said, he didn't reveal the details, but let it slip. we talked about the need to remove tv channels that do not support independence. e, in the conditions of the war. here is the key factor recently shouting at the status of the person who came to

power, because he said that the war should be ended. suddenly he said we have a war, so there are channels of correctness, incorrectly, correctly, because they told him there in london. what are you doing, what is happening tomorrow the elections and what are you doing with medvedchuk there and later a coalition, because they will have a prime minister so that putin, roughly speaking, will get what he wants peacefully, because the ukraine themselves just want the ukrainians themselves, they want the balance themselves ukrainians want, if there are not no alliances with russia, only at least partnership , cooperation and definitely not war. and after that, of course, i agree with the system that you at least jump out of your pants, when you , uh, when the party leader is placed under house arrest, when criminal cases are initiated, when tv channels are closed, when radical and nationalist groups are taken, which under control, the sbu begin to simply beat people on the streets and so on, then, of course, participate in the elections. unfortunately that democracy, which actually existed in ukraine and allowed it at one time. the same inukovich will come to power in the tenth year. she , including the mediocre rule of

yanukovych herself and, of course, pressure. the west and so on was mediocre, just a profukan and instead of going the way of building a sovereign state. this happened in russia and in belarus, for which there are now sanctions and so on. ukraine went the easiest way. that is why mr. akhmetov leaving the donbass is always against us very simply. he has real estate in the west with him property in the west they have money in the west. he may be russian-speaking a thousand times, he may not know the ukrainian language at all , relatively speaking, he may hate bandera a thousand times, but when you have everything there , what some russian oligarchs have and so on. you will always do what you are told. uh, from where else otherwise , it'll stay naked. i always return the fourteenth year, i apologize. here i always have before my eyes the fourteenth year and august of the twentieth in belarus, here is lukashenka and lukoyevich. here lukashenka took a tough decision and the country did not drown in blood. here i am with my hand all the time. here, take it that day disperse to hell that a person is only strictly sanctioned,

let them lead the country to save. yes, yes, money, and now there were herbs. today, listen to this man. this is a man who has gone through fire and water. and now belarus come back i belarusian politicians. here we are , after the twentieth year, someone groans, cleared out public organizations, western funds. foreign-funded shut down you understand there should be no fifth column in the country. that's when the fifth column is in the elections. the end of the country is the end, so little enrolled. here, let everyone hear the weeds. remove everything and 3 m into the ground so that 50 years do not sprout in the elections only national parties , sovereign state parties, like we have now, there are four parties and not one of them, which would not win in parliament, the communists of the ldpb, belarus, no one country will not deploy, as was the alliance with russia, so the constitution will not be destroyed. and they somehow had everything for ukraine financed abroad. all half

of the party is financed abroad, and medvedchuk's party was never allowed to win, because they defended the interests of ukraine, the question arises, but russia saw what was happening and where it was moving before its own eyes. it is this reversal that was not pleasing. we do not wish the majority of ukraine thank you for this question. but despite the fact that your transmission is very serious. i want to say about two olegs, please, you know, and maybe because i am in the middle, i will be lucky, because i wanted to thank the ukrainian oleg for what he did about yanukovych with vodka. and here is the belarusian walnut. i want to scold a little, because he took all my arguments, removed the arguments from what i said, but nevertheless. i will find an opportunity to say what happened, and you, oleg, are absolutely right . and when we started bolotnaya square

and all these actions began. this is the successful information and psychological support of various kinds of military political economic events which are on the plate anglo-sections. they imposed this liberal vomit on us. i apologize for the word associated with various independent public structures, non-profit organizations, all sorts of ngos and created the conditions under which, with acceptable funding. they will blow up the entire public. and uh, unbalance social life, eighteenth year. the academy of the general staff is holding the final meeting of the academy

of military sciences about the famous military leader , the great scientist general of the army gareev makhmud akhmetovich, speaking at this meeting chief of the general staff of russia, and then in an unusual form he devoted the entire report to the so-called fifth colony. he said, guys, i can't take it now. our biggest danger is internal things, what is happening is trying to tear us apart from the inside to create conditions to discredit the authorities. and the most important thing is that the foundation, as leh e said, is enough . we made a lot of mistakes with these oligarchs and so on and created unprecedented things. russia then dealt with this issue, but i remember in our family pretty much everywhere in the media . i referred to the events of the eighteenth year, trying to pay

attention, take it. look what the chief of the general staff said, defended our political blog and so on every time, thinking, based on our mentality of decency, that we are giving signals. they read they don't care about these signals. they do not understand these signals. they don't consider us human beings, they consider us outcasts , they think that we should be like a harmful absolute seed that destroys their lives and destabilizes their economic well-being should be destroyed, and they took us on russia coped with the events in belarus began what happened in belarus, eh? give an example of yanukovych yanukovych being an absolutely random person in power, i

remember that let them not be offended, but a person who has two convictions and so on. it doesn't have to be, but nonetheless in this regard. we have some people. such as zurabov, who should soon. i will think to answer for all events. he then formed. i witnessed these processes, a close friend of petr alekseevich poroshenko, when he said that this was the best president for russia when these elections were taking place and yanukovych was being ousted, that today yanukovych is trying to sit on two chairs with these games, led the country to this state. and let him not be offended. so he was bred, bred, like a boy, that today in the lviv region they say in the lviv region today people who hate us hate russians and so on, they say, listen, how to do it, to return to the days of yanukovych. they already understand these events, and then belarus

and only the position of the president of belarus , who won utter respect. the authority in the russian federation made it possible to preserve the republic of belarus, our union state and the processes that we started in the twenty-second year. they could begin much more seriously in the twentieth year. and then we might not be ready for these processes, which cannot be said about the current situation, and i answer you in full responsibility, i answer that americans today do not know that do. they launched these mechanisms. they do not cope with our mentality. look , they started destroying the russian orthodox church by making it. uh, so to speak, the most destroyed bonds of our russian world, but they misunderstand that those specialists. they will work out that this will only strengthen us.

this is testing us, including testing many serious people, until our patience runs out and we give them a hard punch in the face. i'm not talking about our main argument, nuclear weapons. we are talking about high-quality weapons, modern in conventional equipment that russia has and they are waiting today, because why are there many things in ukraine related to a certain inactivity of the russian federation, because today the collective west, based on their tactics , the tactics of the expeditionary corps, are faced with a huge advantage of the russian, tactics and tactics of the continental state and they're beating the assurance band. not reaching the first milestone. the divisions are the first line of defense. i'm not talking about the second about frontier , and what is the worst thing about today? i say we

we are utilizing the best russian people who are advancing from ukraine today. well, globalists, unfortunately, do not need white orthodox ukrainians with traditional values, so they easily say goodbye to them and burn them in the furnace, because in this concept of the man of the future their vision. of course they have nothing to do with her. you know, the other day there was a big interview with alexander lukashenko, and my colleague, the famous ukrainian journalist diana panchenko , the conversation turned out to be extremely relevant, resonant , frank, and certainly concerned ukraine the brightest quotes. now i heard a lot of people are starting to really evaluate zelensky. therefore, he is rushing to call elections when you have them there in a year or two, or using martial law

to postpone them, that is, it is a very ambiguous fact that zelensky will win these elections. at least rivet him 90% of the rating there , i’ll tell you complete nonsense if the elections are held in the near future one of the military budans there or someone else becomes president, one of the military, but not him. well, if at all you just know how to explain complex things in simple terms, what and when we went wrong when you started plundering ukraine if you want to maintain integrity on the part of the process of some company, the situation is some kind of, uh, to maintain integrity. this should be the unity. the core should be, first of all, the state core, as she always criticizes with us for this vertical of the power of the dictatorship and so on, but it is she who is the vertical and and how do you

call it the dictatorship discipline order, they contributed to the consolidation around this pillar. whole people. well, we still managed to get through to the people to convey to them what needs to be done, including now i’m now putting, if you don’t want to fight like ukraine. let's work in the field people. we heard it from you, it gradually took shape. on it began it was when you started handing out pieces of varnish and pieces to the oligarchs and in this way. you created a mass of centers of power centers, behind which stood the security forces, people with machine guns. i know the kolomoisky taruta, the filter and so on, only i, uh, i remember the name of these, they have become. militants whom it was already difficult for the state to resist and remember, uh,

volodya zelensky arrived somewhere in some part. eh, where did he justify? i'm not a goof. where they just talked to him once heard me. i became terrified. this is generally unacceptable, the main commander, well , anywhere. you, a civilian journalist , could tell zelensky what you think is necessary in person, but not a military man, but it has already come to that. that is, ukraine was dispersed , everything was divided into democracy, they began to play it everyone had to choose to re-elect and the responsibility was blurred by this very thing, but everything began with the privatization of your privatization of the homeless, when in a day one person, either a convict, or a former prisoner, or someone else became a billionaire. this is where it all started growing up. and people offended ukraine , ukrainians were terribly dissatisfied with that situation and that's it. it accumulated, but

from there the economy was the basis of everything, you destroyed the richest. and the most beautiful country, thus then, uh, your flayers came into your politics billionaire oligarchs, they started, uh, elevating certain people to the top. well, then they began to give pieces, like poroshenko. take pieces of some kind of property to give to politicians, and they started to create something. and when politicians have a lot of money in their pockets, they squeeze and put pressure on him. take the same poroshenko yes, and probably, the current president says all the best in the west. therefore, this is how you slowly left statehood, divided ukraine for personal interests. poroshenko had a chance to turn everything around zelensky

including you new man you have nothing to do with it. something happened, but come on, sit down and think about what is best for your state for your people. well, now you are waging this war. so i specially drew this map for you, right now russia will grind you there manpower and strength and equipment. already those motivated ideologically minded natsiks who were called nationalists. these strong ideological people are not there, they have all died already. those who are fighting here are already those whom you catch on the streets and bring here, they are not prepared. well, and a little military they are not cope with this machine russia was rebuilt. russia is at the front today. the newest weapon already grabs the drone already. well, a completely different army and the most dangerous

again, i don’t know whether to tell you or not, they have 250,000 volunteer corps, russia has 250,000, which dobrovolsky is now trained and in reserve. 250.000 at the front now the russians have less. here they are sitting on the defensive, it's not because they can't attack there's no need, but you go, you understand how chipped and drunk you go to the advantage. like in the movies germans shows you go to these barricades but you do not reach. even we see this, and this is how we don’t even reach the minefields, you are simply destroyed by the thousands, you have 45,000 during the counter offensive. during this time, forty -five thousand people died in your country and left with chops.

from there 45.000. here they smell the losses you have one in eight. one in 8 losses at the front and 250,000 reserves armed with the latest technology. here they will grind you here, and then they will do what the management is most afraid of. they will cut you off. here's to moldova in transnistria, they will cut you off, what will you do then, and here, here , the poles rub their hands, pushing the americans. they will cut off the west from you, you will be left with this piece, if you have. that's what will happen to you and the state, as the ukraine of our state with you will not be our native land and my own history. that's what you now do not stop it will be. if you don't sit down at the negotiating table now,

russia is proposing that you don't want to? well, if you don't want to, don't. the power of russia is enough and no west will help you in this regard, it is necessary take your head in your hands and act on the basis of realities, but act in the interests of this vast beautiful territory. the west is already beginning to understand that nothing will happen, even with the help of the west, ukraine will not be able to withstand oleg, and indeed, sooner or later, his will end. with what result for russia with what for ukraine so far it is difficult to imagine alexander grigorievich showed on the map what ukraine can be yes, its remnant, and that's what surprises is the cynicism of ukrainian politicians who are now there in ukraine they we are convinced that sooner or later russia will still have to negotiate something with them. here. what do you think, are they right in their convictions, but he advised, uh,

to listen to alexander grigorievich our president more, because basically, what is happening now, he predicted everything. he spoke just recently. look, we see that the counteroffensive has completely bogged down. and i also want to recall the words of the president when he spoke about this about the results of the counteroffensive, but then you need to listen to him. further what he said, how will you stop russia later, like how the west is going to stop russia later, so i agree with my colleague russia in military terms, no one will defeat belarus and belarus will never in their life, so they will always bet on blowing us up from the inside, they themselves do not believe in any then the military way, so the rate will be 24 year, 25 year blow up the election. again, create some kind of fifth column to somehow destroy everything, and the post-soviet countries and ukrainians must finally understand one simple thing that no one has ever talked about them in the west who was worried and who is interested in ukraine

being a strong, independent, powerful, this is belarus, russia, this is our neighbor. i also, so that there is no war there, because my grandmother was born there in odessa. i went there. i know they are our neighbors. i dream that it would be good there and russia wants the same, and the president told them about this all the time , we want peace in ukraine when the ukrainians themselves decide this together with us. we can agree on everything without a mediator without driving these americans. they need to go to hell from europe when they are expelled from europe, europe will prosper, will the ukrainians be left to decide on their own? how do you think? is it possible to have certain revolutionary moods in society, because dissatisfaction with what is happening is growing every day? well, this is also important. this is, in order for people to get some kind of insight so that there really isn’t such a situation as now, when it strengthens us,

to be honest, there is no need to apply a western curator, even when it’s easier for people to believe, uh, into propaganda stamps and pick them up and so further. and when we are only on exodus mobilization. we see that in reality , ukrainian society today no longer wants to fight, but in words, if that's how much the curse is still there against me like me. and although, what is the most offensive and rightly said, and france ladies and here we are, dear colleagues, supported, but any outcome is out of will. in any case, no one will be happy, because every day we all lose together. you are at war with yourself. by the way, the poles should think 30 times if they poke their noses, then they will fight with them in a completely different way, because there are definitely no such centimeter to them. and how do russian belarusians have ukrainians there to each other, so that they don’t talk there. and the worst thing is that, when we warned this, and we were the main problems, by the way, together, among other things, with the belarusian president lukashenko, who always advocated

that russia compromise. and for what i think, there are many among the russian church of the patriots who do not like either medvedchuk or our team, not alexander lukashenko, which i think that it was necessary to in the fourteenth year, to go there with tanks, everything, as it were, to crush, uh, and so on , to annex ukraine and something else, but in fact they convinced, they persuaded, they argued that a military solution would be a tragedy for everyone in any case, they said that there is another way offered to this huge force , and therefore the negotiations were in minsk lukashenka in his authority, and put it politically to convince the then russian leadership that even poroshenko could come to an agreement with this. in the end, what if behind this everyone did not stand, decisive own west then agreed. we agreed and i would have done what would have been done , but since the most key moment always appeared advisers who said , dear petr alekseevich

, you’ll run away to moscow with the stolen billions in the end. generally. you, of course, well done. you, of course, are there, maybe, how you want to go to the country, but we need other plans about ukraine, so we will provide this war here anyway. here. on the air , the program sas is authorized to declare talking about elections and external players. is the west ready to reset power in ukraine and before we continue our discussion. i would like to draw your attention to the schedule that my colleagues and i have prepared to rely on the sociological data published by the ukrainian media now, of course. they cannot be clearly distorted, both consciously and objectively people. they are simply afraid to talk about their real attitude to power, but the other day i came across interesting data from a survey commissioned by an authoritative publication, a conservative sociological group, rating. questions have been formulated. so, we can

assume fairly honest answers from ukrainians. here the opinion of ukrainians is divided, who owes whom after the conflict. we see that 29% believe that the eu will owe ukraine for protecting them from russia, again, 56% of ukraine after the end of the conflict will owe nato for the provided assistance and weapons. that is to say, ukrainians today already understand that this assistance is not gratuitous. and for everything. will have to pay. yes, yes, but what should ukraine take away? what they took away now they give the most that they have prices - these are human lives the earth they took the enterprises a long time ago they took the economy they took natural resources. who owns the grain, that it is arable land for ukrainians. all to some companies that are managed in the west, therefore, unfortunately, the problem of ukraine will be how to return its people. this is the main problem of ukraine, how to return the good to the people, because people are already taking away people's lives

, the fact of the matter is that they took everything, and then they threw it to the war, france is there, and is it possible to return anything to the ukrainian. no people only the people remained, and nothing else in ukraine no, but i want to be more meaningful. i want you back. e. as oleg gaidukevich says by the fourteenth year, after all, everything was thought out so that you understand, starting from the nineteenth year and ending with the fourteenth to the united states of america and nato well, nato we nominally say nato is the vassals of the americans by the fourteenth year they should have turned crimea to the largest military base of the united states, hiding behind a nato umbrella, where construction contracts have already been concluded, schools polygon kindergartens. at the same time, not ukrainian specialists worked there,

but american specialists brought in were restoring the old soviet catacombs associated with the preservation of the safety of modern naval vessels, primarily the nuclear submarine fleet. enormous work, and all this was against the background of the red lines, which we said that the americans had such a base in the crimea. this is control over all of europe over all of russia and the almost complete degradation of our further future prospects for the russian federation as the state and even under these conditions, russia spoke, but did nothing, and thanks to the russian people living in the crimea , whom russia supported

, justice was established. us in the first part of our program. when you said that the west began to divide, he understood that today it is impossible to win under these conditions. and save some stronghold and do something he must he understands that there must remain a platform from which modern ammunition will be launched even in these conditions, when a special military operation is underway, and a proxy war declared by russia on nato. we are criticized by our own e opponents of our patriots, many experts say we are conducting a specially military operation, we are not destroying ukraine and sometimes acting illogically. we're waiting for the west

to open up. we have not yet used modern weapons, and i could here for days tell a comparative analysis of what we have, what they have, we have today advantage in everything in training in military-technical equipment tactics, but we understand that power is unequal today and our advantage is our quality and skill in these conditions, what did the collective west create? look, alexander grigorievich spoke about this more than once today, including the russian president, who spoke more under the guise of an allegedly mythical danger. difficult, he says, we are making the best army in the world. he did not even hesitate to put in second place, as he believes the american armed forces and they will form on the border. 300.000 while that

as far as the baltics are concerned, with the capabilities, the restored military infrastructure of the baltic republics of the soviet union, they are able to increase the grouping to 200,000 in three days, while the 101 airborne division of the united states of america with 400 helicopters is located on the border with ukraine, there are 6 km on the territory of romania, ready at any time , so to speak , get involved in these things. we understand that today announcing the so-called global lightning strike concept, when they are planning 5,000 precision-guided munitions in conventional equipment. hmm, hit within an hour. russian critical military, uh, important communications and so on, which also nullifies our nuclear. and our military-technical capabilities this is a serious danger.