after all, i and the host nadezhda sas welcome you and remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of everyone in the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. let's tell you right now, us president joe biden has been heavily criticized for his lackluster response to the massive fires on the hawaiian island of maui, which claimed the lives of more than 100 americans for several days on vacation, biden ignored tim then promised affected families compensation in the amount of just $700, and on tuesday, when asked what he could say about the record victims, he answered. i have nothing to add smiled and left the opponents. they could not get past this and accused biden of indifference to the suffering of fellow citizens. meanwhile , biden's main rival donald trump , the us law enforcement system does not get tired

of making new accusations. so a georgia state grand jury indicted trump and a group of 18 people in connection with the attempts. cancel results the 2020 elections, which the former president believes were rigged, are now indicted on 13 counts. these include violating georgia's anti-racketeering and corruption act, inciting government officials to violate their oaths, conspiring to forge and filing false documents among allies, trump, who has been indicted by his lawyers rudy giuliani, former white house chief mark meadows, and several advisers . the billionaire himself believes that the presentation of new charges against him address is directly related to the election campaign in the country. the chief of staff of the nato secretary general suggested that ukraine would be able to gain membership in the alliance in exchange for parts of the territory about it.

he told during the debate that the norwegian city was rented in his opinion, this could be part of the end of the conflict, at the same time, he recalled the words of his head of the general secretary, jens stoltenberg, that ukraine should decide for itself when and under what conditions it wants to negotiate according to him according to the discussion of the possible membership of ukraine in nato after the conflicts, it is already underway and during the discussion options are heard that provide for territorial concessions. kiev i'm not saying that it should be, but it could be a possible solution explained the politician. well , today in our program we will talk about ukraine about the future of ukraine to the famous german chancellor. otto von bismarck is credited with such words never lie so much as after the hunt during the war and before the elections, to say nothing of the elections during the war. here, within the lies of manipulation no , by definition, and it is in this way that power is going to send the already long-suffering ukraine about why in

kiev they suddenly began to actively prepare for the elections. and what does this mean for the course of the conflict will be discussed in today's program i will be helped to understand this topic by oleg idukevich, deputy of the house of representatives of the national assembly of the republic of belarus , chairmen of the liberal democratic party of belarus hello. good afternoon today in the studio with us oleg voloshin, deputy of the verkhovna rada of ukraine of the ninth convocation , member of the other movement, ukraine hello oleg hello and glad to welcome france damovich klintsevich military expert leader of russia to our studio. hello afghan veterans union. thank you very much for traditionally starting our program with us today with a quick question, which is addressed to each participant in today's discussion of elections in ukraine under conditions of war. is it incredible enough to be true oleg the events of the political life of ukraine to us in my own personal memory, but have always pushed the limits of what can be considered incredible and even because

what is happening today i think of all those present a few years ago, but a nightmare could not have been imagined, therefore the fact that zelensky is a company in order to maintain power is the only thing that works, uh, drives. uh, ready to do the seemingly impossible under normal election conditions, uh, in combat conditions . and i think it’s quite possible that france is there, please, it’s solid, and profanation of elections in these conditions cannot be held and no one can participate in them. it will be impossible to get an objective assessment of too large losses and huge difficulties that today ukraine is experiencing a huge number of mistakes and miscalculations. and most importantly, the loss of full state sovereignty and dependence on the united states of america and the collective west will not be given to ukrainians, but no chance

to support, uh, comrade zelensky, who, as he says, we are all comrades here. oleg elections in ukraine yes , there is no point in these elections, because there was no choice in ukraine already. i don't remember. how old are the real democratic, because there are candidates, who would advocate, for example, for normal relations with russia, they are simply destroyed in any way, especially the second moment of the fourteenth year, but uh, ukraine has lost sovereignty zelensky does not solve anything. biden will give the command. will hold elections will not give the command will not hold elections. for what purpose, uh, or to geneticize zelensky and them. what difference does it make to be legitimate on it, legitimate in terms of what is happening there, they are completely controlled by the people, they do not decide anything. uh, in fact, this territory is for resolving issues of the united states of america it's a tool, so there's no point in these choices. uh, so far i don’t see any, but there’s no need to be surprised, thanks, it’s important to note that the blind desire to simply break away from

russia, which replaced the desire to become a truly independent state, turned ukraine into not even the fifty-first state of the united states. and what does washington care about a large-scale system? today, ukraine is just a tool against moscow, a platform for earning in the price of the outflow of texation office, whether this is the fate of this earth, or whether the serf mentality makes itself felt, or maybe hopeless life in anticipation of a real owner led to such deplorable consequences. oleg i know that you maintain communication relationships with certain colleagues of yours who are now in ukraine. but indeed, the formation of certain political alliances is already being discussed , headquarters are being set up, and new political projects are being created. is it possible that once again the ukrainian authorities will be able to cheat the ukrainian people. well, as alexander sergeevich pushkin wrote, to whom, unfortunately, monuments are being demolished in my homeland and forbid its study in schools that

it is not difficult to deceive those who are glad to be deceived themselves. i would, despite the fact that we love to say everything there, each in his own country. there is about the wise belarusian people, the wise, russian people, the wise, ukrainian people. this, as it were , always sounds beautifully pretentious in fact. the situation that exists there, if something globally does not suit someone, this is always the result. and how she ordered, if not all, of course, then some kind of majority, at least in the nineteenth year and here with i don’t agree with my respected belarusian colleagues, the election of mr. zelensky was the result of an absolute sincere expression of will, people wanted to simultaneously expel the entire elite, which they thought they were sincere to steal, there and so on and so on and so on. there, they listen to either washington or moscow. and it ’s not clear who the actor believed in the series, er, which is the president, who supposedly rides a bicycle, is elected there. and there, from machine guns, he shoots those who exploded there. karpov got what the ukrainians got now, continue stubbornly believe. unfortunately, even one hundred percent

of the missiles that are shot down by the ukrainian air defense there are shot down more than the russians are launching, and the west is also capable of direct defense there. and at least, uh, in parallel with this action, there is severe censorship and repression, when those who understand that they are trying to sell some nonsense cannot express their opinion. actually, that’s why i am now in minsk, for example, not in kiev because i’m located, but today in kiev where i have arrests in absentia and a criminal case on charges of promoting pro-russian narratives on the verkhovna rada, which, of course, is wildness, because in any constitution of any country, and a deputy speaking from the tribune has the right to say anything, except for direct insults, for example, another colleague. that is, i could have been firing at the verkhovna rada to say that i believe that it is necessary to restore the soviet union there in ukraine or become part of the commonwealth speech, this is a matter of evaluating any ukrainian politician who currently has criminal prosecution in ukraine. you are in the category of adequate people who understand why

to rule out what is twitchy unfortunately, suffering from fighting from poverty from e, loss of prospects from the fact that the mobilization of people is carried out this way, there are enough people on the streets and so on, people will want to once again believe in some kind of fairy tale, it exists and i think we'll talk more about this later. even for those some kind of poly-proctome that appear when artificially. suddenly , some kind of positioner is being constructed, and yesterday's man, who received money from zelensky, is already an arrest officer. and people begin to trust him for some part. to say that, unfortunately, unfortunately, until now the ukrainians have not got rid of it, and from vera , as it is said in our anthem, our expressions are good in the sun. yes, this is an absolutely mythological worldview, that at the same time, without making any effort, you can defeat everyone and become happy rich, like mmm. you know, here's the momentum . mmm, unfortunately, it spreads among the part of the ukrainians, which suppresses it. the rest that thinking minority that always said, guys it won't be like that maybe you need to take into account the interests of the great

powers, you need to take into account our geographical position, like it or not, russia is always our neighbor. this is a common history, this is just a great power and so on. thank you very much, france there, that you are a person so experienced, so the politics of me so called and you are fine. remember the whole history of independent ukraine, at what point, in your opinion, happened, that notorious turn to me there, because at the moment there are still unsinkable in the ukrainian political elite political figures such as petro poroshenko and yulia tymoshenko, who sat in the shadows for quite a long time after the start of the special military operation , remained silent. and now they began to enter the political arena demanding the resignation of zelensky to overthrow the regime. what do you think, if these political figures have a future? there is no future for these political figures, there is no doubt about it, but you have asked an extremely deep and

meaningful question. and i, unfortunately, will try to be brief, but it is very difficult to answer it briefly, because many, probably, here even among the seated competent people. in this studio, those who are not aware , for example, that the movement of hands that became nationalistic was once created at the direction of the ussr state security committee with an indication of ukraine supposedly to resolve some issues. i was recently at the birthday party of a very respected among us, er, colonel-generals in the smolensk region. he told when he was with his wife already being a regiment commander. uh, the zenit rocket served in lvov. he says, the ninety-first year has passed, these

changes in the separation associated with a state act that did not exist at all, and then gorbachev did not give the state security committee , did not give the communist party, did not show power in the teeth, and in the ninety -second year in january, as soon as it happened to him . representatives of the state security committee of ukraine also came and said, “comrade colonel, we have analyzed some of your historical events, your father. the captain of the smersh on the territory of the lviv region destroyed bandera and our great past ninety-second year you are an unwanted element in our country. here the wife can serve. and you, please in the century. imagine the ninety-second year, which means for this period, taking into account our history, why do i always say that gorbachev yeltsin shushkevich and

kravchuk are traitors to our country and the destroyers of our great motherland, and i will never refuse these words. no matter how liberal democratic some important processes no one hides behind, but today, in the conditions in which we find ourselves for long period. the influence on ukraine was colossal, it was so colossal that then kravchuk was persuaded and told that it was necessary to give up nuclear weapons, because they did not want them to spread, and by and large, in the three republics of russia , ukraine and belarus, there were nuclear weapons and the americans were already thinking and understood. and , when we are talking about the 21st century, this is the century of the creation of a special type of military operations , information and psychological operations, and in these information and psychological operations

today, from what is happening firmware of the ukrainian people, the reformatization of consciousness, it is colossal, but today, listen, they often scold me, they say, but they have achieved such great success that they managed to turn 90% of the population of ukraine on us, however, there are many of your specialists who are deeply immersed. and you can probably support me. they know that many, well, do not sincerely say that other people have a different opinion, but nonetheless. this firmware happened very seriously and in these conditions they no longer understand. well, every day they drip, but they do not understand that there is a disposal most of the russian. the world of a large part of kievan rus and i, yes, i would also like to remind you why today we do not hear the voices of ordinary ukrainians, because by

the beginning of 2021 zelensky had completed a complete transformation from a naive and inexperienced newcomer, ready, as he said, to give up power for the sake of bringing peace on ukrainian soil to working in close conjunction with the most radical russophobes in london in washington politics how the opposition was liquidated in ukraine under the sound of war, objectionable party authorities were banned established an information monopoly of power. recall in our story with the coming to power of vladimir zelensky, many ukrainian journalists are ordinary citizens. they were able to finally get rid of illusions in a democratic society and freedom of the media in the country, it was he who, by his decree, closed the largest positional tv channels. and despite the fact that the decision clearly violated ukrainian law, he challenged it in court. it never succeeded curiously that in the months leading up to the closing, zelenskiy's opinion was the opposite. i really respect every channel. i have never closed a single

channel in my life, i am personally for freedom of speech and you know it very well, i will never close any channels in my life i have no right i have no authority to censor. strengthened after the start of its office, zelensky, with the help of the largest media holdings, launched a single news telethon, at which leading experts actively promote not only the president, but also his entire team, reporting on successes at the front, in fact, the telethon has become the only source for a significant part of ukrainians socio-political news, which is undoubtedly beneficial for zelensky to his team. and those who held a different opinion. they simply removed them from the air, as it happened. from the channels of petro poroshenko, they were turned off after the ex-president of ukraine refused to participate in the marathon, adviser to the head of the presidential office, mykha podolyak, explained the decision by the excessive narcissism of the former head of state in practice. it's just another way to set your monopoly in the wake.

political parties have also been hit by the media. zelensky closed everything political associations, the course of which could at least slightly diverge from that adopted in the country. first of all. this affected all parties with a couple of russian views, the national security council of ukraine decided to suspend any activity of a number of political parties, and the ministry of justice was instructed immediately. to ensure the termination of the activities of these political forces, according to many experts. everything, this is undoubtedly connected with the upcoming presidential and parliamentary elections in ukraine. see, what kind of elections in ukraine who hates russia more here are the elections they want to hold there now, returning from the nineteenth year, why do i think that there were no elections even then. here is a politician who is independent. therefore, there are criminal cases against him, because he defended the national interests of ukraine in ukraine, there has always been an illusion of elections, like poland will now have elections. what difference does it make who wins duda or not, and those and those pro-american forces will not

change anything. they will argue whether abortions or no, lgbt more less nationalism more and less, but the essence of polish politics will not change. in ukraine, everything is the same. only it was a little more difficult before zelensky, who stood behind him before the elections, everyone saw the wonderful things. why ukraine was under external control from this all, who appointed the ministers, the us ambassador who was in kiev, not a single official could be appointed without actually agreeing with the administration of uh, the united states of america is an independent state. therefore, their elections have always been a sweep of those political forces that would actually be for an independent ukraine at the beginning of their souls or slowly, but they were not allowed to take part in serious political processes. and if medvedchuk had never won, they would not have let him win, just as they will never let him defeat marilya pan in france , they will never let him win, as long as the winner was tnt for germany, uh, in germany they even want to ban them now. that's what european democracy

and american we control you. here is the illusion of elections of two or three candidates. and now the next elections will be even worse in ukraine they will let those who will compete, who hates russia more, poroshenko will come out, i will tell, that’s how it will come out to fight, zelensky is there, anyone, who else is standing there, but they can still make it thinner, they can release a politician into the political arena, which, may be allowed to say something else. but again, i very much doubt that such politicians as our friend is standing in the studio will be allowed to participate in the elections. but if they allowed it, they won, why did they ban someone from the party, what are they afraid of, we recall all the percentages to our respected viewers, the rating of political parties in ukraine on the eve of the svu, this is february 2022. quite right, sociologists found out that ukrainians would like volodymyr

zelensky and the servants of the people to continue to lead the country after the next elections. and now, in addition to this schedule , there was another survey conducted by 17% of respondents. they answered yes to question a 57. we would not like such a development of events, and now we see the rating of political parties, the servant of the people has 11.5% that is, after a certain amount, in fact a few years have passed since the parliamentary elections , the situation has changed . naturally, if it were not for the special, military operation, the rating of zelensky and his retinue would be zero all tv channels were closed. and why were they closed at all, in principle, because representatives of our party and more are not only members, there are fractions, but also just there, a political scientist who shared our views was denied access to all other channels. that is, we just removed from the information field, and still life,

yes, and we still, by the way, here in third place. but in what i systematically fundamentally agree with my namesake that and if we took a schedule, e sociology for january of the twenty-first year, on the second of february, the tv channel was closed absolutely out of lawlessness, and after mi-6 and the state department they gave the go-ahead, they said, we will cover you to close, moreover, there is a version of information that it was almost on their command to do this at all. and so, uh, we then had the first rating in the country, what is it fundamentally agree, as soon as here we are some colleagues. discussion, especially there in russia. here you are with medvedchuk koma, you lost everything, that we lost, we had the most popular media holding. we had the first rated game. we won the local elections in 2020 and formed the largest factions in the entire southeast in all regional councils where it was possible. and then , during a visit to london, mr. zelensky goes to richard moore, the head of mi-6 from intelligence , in an unprecedented way, that is, i can’t do all this in even a nightmare to imagine yes, so that, for example, x lukashenka is not just accepted into himself.

yes, there is the head of the intelligence officer of some structure of a friendly country. there russia or china and during the visit went to his building. there , not a single self-respecting leader does this for a briefing, and then he went there and he was there, that he himself get out of there. he said, he didn't reveal the details, but let it slip. we talked about the need to remove tv channels that do not support independence. ah, in a war. here is a key factor recently yells a quote from a man who came to power because he said that the war must be ended. suddenly he said we have a war, so there are channels, if wrong correct correct because he was told there in london. what are you doing, what is happening tomorrow the elections and what are you doing with medvedchuk there pzh coalition? maybe they will have the prime minister so that putin, roughly speaking, will get what he wants peacefully, because the ukry themselves. so they just want the ukrainians themselves want a balance , the ukrainians themselves want, if there is no union with russia, only partnership to a minimum cooperation and certainly not war. and after that, of course, i agree with the systems that you at least jump out of your pants, when you, uh

, when the party leader is placed under house arrest, when criminal cases are initiated, when tv channels are closed, when radical and nationalist groups that are under control are taken , the sbu just start beating people on the streets and so on, then, of course, they participate in the elections. unfortunately, the democracy that actually existed in ukraine and allowed it at the time. to the same inukovich to come to power in the tenth year. she , including the mediocre rule of yanukovych herself and, of course, pressure. the west and so on was mediocre, just a profanity and instead of going the way of building a sovereign state. as it happened in russia and belarus, why are there now sanctions and so on, ukraine went the simplest way. that's why mr. akhmetov get out of the donbass is always against us very simply. he has real estate in the west he has property in the west they have money for west. he may be russian-speaking a thousand times, he may not know the ukrainian language at all , relatively speaking, he may hate bandera a thousand times, but when you have everything there , what some russian oligarchs have and

so on. you will always do what you are told. uh, from where else otherwise , it'll stay naked. i always return the fourteenth year, i apologize. here i always have before my eyes the fourteenth year and august of the twentieth in belarus, lukashenka and lukoyevich. here lukashenka took a tough decision and the country did not drown in blood. here i am with my hand all the time. here you take that day disperse to hell that a person in a pre-trial detention center is severely sanctioned. let them lead the country saved. yes, yes, and now they were right. today, listen to this man. this is a man who went through fire and water, and now belarus come back and belarusian politicians. here we are, after the twentieth year, someone groans, cleared out public organizations, western funds. financed abroad closed you understand the fifth column in the country should not be. here when the fifth column is in the elections. the end of the country is the end, so little enrolled. here,

let everyone hear the weeds. remove everything and 3 m into the ground so that 50 years do not sprout in the elections only national parties , sovereign state parties, like we have now, there are four parties and not one of them, which would not win in parliament, the communists of the ldpb, belarus, no one country will not deploy, as was the alliance with russia, so the constitution will not be destroyed. and somehow they had everything financed abroad in ukraine. all half party financed abroad, and medvedchuk's party was never allowed to win, because they defended the interests of ukraine, the question arises, but russia saw what was happening and where it was heading before her eyes. it is this reversal that was not pleasing. we do not wish the majority of ukraine thank you for this question. but despite the fact that your transmission is very serious. i want to say about two olegs, please, you know, and maybe because i am in the middle i will be lucky, because

i wanted to thank the ukrainian oleg, because he made about yanukovych for vodka and here is the belarusian walnut. i want to scold a little, because he removed all my argumentation. he removed the argumentation from what i said, but nevertheless. i will find an opportunity to say what happened, and you, oleg, are absolutely right. and when we started bolotnaya square and started all these actions. this is the successful informational psychological support of various kinds of military political events. economic, in which the anglo-saxons they imposed on us this liberal vomit. i apologize for the word associated with various independent

public structures, non-profit organizations, all sorts of ngos and created the conditions under which, with acceptable funding. they will blow up the entire public. and uh, unbalance social life, eighteenth year. the academy of the general staff is holding the final meeting of the academy of military sciences conducted by the famous military leader, the great scientist general of the army. gorelov mahmud akhmetvich. at this meeting , the chief of the general staff of russia and then in an unusual form he devoted the entire report so we are the fifth colony, he said, guys, we can’t take me now. our biggest danger is internal things , what is happening is trying to tear us apart from the inside to create conditions to discredit

the government. and most importantly, that the foundation, as lech said, is enough. we made a lot of mistakes with these oligarchs and so on and created unprecedented things . russia then dealt with this issue, but i remember in our media. almost everywhere in the media. i sent to events of the eighteenth year, trying to pay attention. take a look at what the chief of the general staff said. our political bloc has defended this way every time, thinking, based on our mentality of decency, that we are giving signals. they read they don't care about these signals. they don't understand these. they don’t consider us to be salaries, they consider us outcasts, they think that we should

be destroyed as a harmful absolute seed that destroys their lives and destabilizes their economic well-being, and they took us russia coped began events in belarus what happened to belarus uh, it is necessary to give an example of yanukovych yanukovych being absolutely. a random person in power i remember that let them not be offended, but a person who has two convictions and so on. it doesn't have to be, but nonetheless in this regard. we have some people, such as zurabov, who should soon. i will think to answer for all events. he then formed. i witnessed these processes, a close friend of petro alekseevich poroshenko, when he said, that this is the best president for russia when these elections were held and yanukovych was removed; that

today yanukovych, with these games, trying to sit on two chairs, led the country to this state. and let him not be offended. this is how they divorced him, like a boy, that today people in lviv region speak in lviv region today people who hate us hate russians and so on, they say, listen, how to make it so that he returned to the days of yanukovych they already understand these events, and then belarus and only the position of the president belarus, which has gained utter respect for its authority in the russian federation , has been allowed to preserve the republic of belarus, our union state and the processes that we started in the twenty-second year. they could begin much more seriously in the twentieth year. and then we might not have been ready for these processes, which is impossible to say, but in the current

situation and i answer you with full responsibility, the americans today do not know what to do. they launched these mechanisms. they do not cope with our mentality. see they began to destroy the russian orthodox church, making it. uh, so to speak, the most destroyed bonds of our russian world, but they misunderstand that those specialists. they will work out that this will only strengthen us. this is testing us, including testing many serious people, until our patience runs out and we give them a hard punch in the face. i'm not talking about our main argument, nuclear weapons. we are talking about high-quality weapons, modern in conventional equipment, which russia has and they today they are waiting for why in ukraine there are many things related to a certain inactivity

of the russian federation, because today the collective west, based on their tactics , the tactics of the expeditionary forces are faced with a huge advantage of the russian, tactics and tactics of the continental state, and they are fighting the security zone. not reaching the first milestone. the divisions are the first line of defense. i'm not talking about the second about and the frontier, and today the worst thing i 'm talking about is that we are utilizing the best russian people who are advancing from ukraine today, but the globalists, unfortunately, do not need white orthodox ukrainians with traditional values, so they easily say goodbye to them and burn them in the furnace, because this concept of the human of the future is their vision. of course they have nothing to do with her. you know, the other day there was a big interview with alexander lukashenko, and my colleague, the famous

ukrainian journalist diana panchenko , the conversation turned out to be extremely relevant, resonant , frank, of course, ukraine was the most striking quote. now a lot of people will hear and begin to really evaluate zelensky. therefore, he is rushing to call elections when you have them there in a year or two, or using martial law to postpone them, that is, it is a very ambiguous fact that zelensky will win these elections. at least rivet him 90% of the rating there , i’ll tell you complete nonsense if the elections are held in the near future one of the military budans there or someone else becomes president, one of the military, but not him. well, if it’s quite simple, you know how to explain complex things in simple terms, what and when we went wrong then, when you started plundering ukraine

, if you want to preserve integrity on the part of the process of some company, the situation is, uh, to preserve integrity. this should be the unity. the core should be, first of all, the state core, as we always criticize it for this vertical power, dictatorship and so on, but it is she who is the vertical and and what do you call it dictatorship. understandable discipline order, they contributed to the consolidation around this pillar. whole people. well, to us still managed to get through to people to convey to them what needs to be done, including now i now put, if you do not want to fight like ukraine. let's work in the field people. they hear it from you, it gradually took shape. on it began it was when you started handing out pieces of varnish and pieces to the oligarchs and

in this way. you created a mass of centers of power centers, behind which stood the security forces, people with machine guns. i know the kolomoisky taruta there, the filter and so on, only i, uh, remember my last name, they have become. militants whom it was already difficult for the state to resist and remember, uh, volodya zelensky arrived somewhere in some part. eh, where did he justify? i'm not a goof. where they just talked to him once heard me. i became terrified. this is generally unacceptable, the main commander, well , anywhere. you, a civilian journalist , could tell zelensky what you think is necessary in person, but not a military man, but it has already come to that. that is, ukraine was dispersed , everything was divided into democracy, they began to play it to choose to re-elect everyone

and blurred the responsibility by this very thing, but everything began with the privatization of your privatization of the homeless, when in a day one person , either a convict, or a former prisoner, or someone else became a billionaire. this is where it all started growing. and people offended ukraine , ukrainians were terribly dissatisfied with that situation and that's it. it accumulated, but from there the economy was the basis of everything, you destroyed the richest. and the most beautiful country by this same then, uh, these flayers of yours came into your politics billionaire oligarchs, they started, uh, elevating certain people to the top. well, then they began to give away pieces, like poroshenko. take pieces of some kind of property to give to politicians, and they began

to create something. and when politicians have a lot of money in their pockets, they squeeze and put pressure on him. take the same poroshenko yes, and probably, they say the current president. uh, everything, the best in the west. therefore, this is how you slowly left statehood, and divided ukraine for personal interests poroshenko zelensky had a chance to turn everything around , including you. a new person, you have nothing to do with it. something happened, but come on, sit down and think about what is best for your state for your people. well, now you are waging this war. so i specially drew this map for you, right now russia will grind you there manpower and strength and equipment. already those motivated ideologically inclined natsiks who were called nationalists strong these

people ideologically do not exist, they have all died already. who is fighting here is already those whom you catch on the streets and bring here, they will not prepared. well, and a little military, they will not cope with this machine. russia has rebuilt. russia is at the front today. the newest weapon already grabs the drone already. well, a completely different army and the most dangerous one again, i don’t know whether to tell you or not, they have 250,000 volunteer corps, russia has 250,000, which are volunteers, who are now trained and in reserve. 250.000 at the front now the russians have less. here they are sitting on the defensive, it 's not because they can't attack there's no

need, but you go, you understand how chipped and drunk you go to the advantage. as in the movie of the germans shows you go to these barricades but you do not reach. even this we see, and this is how we do not even reach the minefields, you are simply destroyed by the thousands, you have 45,000 during the counter offensive. during this time, forty -five thousand people died in your country and left with chops. from there 45.000. here they smell the losses you have one in eight. one in eight losses at the front and 250,000 reserves armed with the latest technology. here they will grind you here, and then they will do what they are most afraid of guides. they will cut you off. here in moldova , in transnistria, they will cut you off, what will you do then, and here, here,

the poles are rubbing their hands, pushing the americans. they will cut off the west from you, you will have this piece, if you left it. that's what will happen to you and the state, as the ukraine of our state with you will not be our native land, yours and my own history. here's what you imagine it to be. if you don't sit down at the negotiating table now, russia is proposing that you don't want to? well, if you don't want to , don't. the power of russia is enough and no west for you will not help in this regard, we must take our heads in our hands and act on the basis of realities, but act in the interests of this vast beautiful territory. the west is already beginning to understand that nothing will happen, even with the help of the west, ukraine will not be able to withstand oleg, and indeed, sooner or later

, it will complete its own. with what result for russia with what for ukraine so far it is difficult to imagine alexander grigorievich showed on the map what ukraine can be yes, its remnant, and that's what surprises is the cynicism of ukrainian politicians who are now there in ukraine. they are convinced that sooner or later russia will still have to negotiate something with them. here. what do you think, are they right in their beliefs, but he advised, uh, to listen more to alexander grigorysh, our president, after all. basically, what is happening now, he predicted everything. he spoke just recently. look, we see that the counteroffensive has completely bogged down. and i also want to recall the words of the president when he spoke about this about the results of the counteroffensive, but then you need to listen to him. further, what did he say, how will you stop russia then how the west is going to stop russia later , so i agree with my colleague russia

militarily no one will defeat and belarus will never be in his life, so they will always bet on blowing us up from the inside , they do not believe themselves in some kind of military way, so the rate will be 24 year, 25 year blow up the election. again, create some kind of fifth column to somehow destroy everything, and the post-soviet countries and ukrainians must finally understand one simple the thing is that no one in the west has ever worried about them and who is interested in ukraine being strong, independent, powerful - this is belarus, russia, this is our neighbor me. i want there to be no war, because my grandmother was born there in odessa. i went there. i know they are our neighbors. i dream that it would be good there and russia wants the same, and the president told them about this all the time , we want peace in ukraine when the ukrainians themselves decide this together with us. we can agree on everything without an intermediary without these drive the americans. they should be to hell with

europe when they are expelled from europe europe will prosper will the ukrainians be given their own decision? how do you think? is it possible to have certain revolutionary moods in society, because dissatisfaction with what is happening is growing every day? well, this is also important. this is so that people get some kind of insight so that there really isn’t such a situation as it is now, when it will strengthen us, frankly speaking, there is no need to apply a western curator. again, when it's easier for people to believe, uh, in stamps propaganda and pick them up and so on. and when we are only on exodus mobilization. we see that in reality , ukrainian society today no longer wants to fight, but in words, if that's how much the curse is still there against me like me. and although, what is most offensive and rightly said, but also france ladies and here we are, dear colleagues, supported any outcome.

in any case, no one will be happy, because every day we all lose together. you are at war with yourself, by the way, the poles should 30 times to think, if they stick in, then they will fight with them with everything differently , because they don’t have such a centimeter to them . and the worst thing is that, when we warned this, and we were the main problems, by the way, together, among other things, with the belarusian president lukashenko , who always advocated that russia compromise. and for what i think, there are many among the russian church of the patriots who do not like either medvedchuk or our team alexander lukashenko that they believe that back in the fourteenth year it was necessary to go there with tanks, how to crush, uh, and so on , to annex ukraine and something else, but in fact they persuaded, they argued that a military solution would in any case be a tragedy for everyone to say that there is another way offered to this enormous effort. and so the negotiations were in minsk lukashenka

had his own authority, and he put political authority on convincing the then russian leadership that even poroshenko could do it with this reach an agreement. as a result, that if the decisive will of the west had not been behind it all , they agreed we agreed and it would be fulfilled and i what would be doable, but since the most key moment always appeared advisers who said dear petr alekseevich to their edge on stolen billions somewhere as a result, you will run to moscow. you have the wrong one there. in general, you, of course, well done. you, of course, are there, maybe, as you wish better from the outside, but we have other plans about ukraine. we will provide war here anyway. here. on the air , the sas program is authorized to announce that we are talking about elections and external players. is the west ready to reset power in ukraine and before

we continue our discussion. i would like to draw your attention to the schedule that my colleagues and i have prepared to rely on the sociological data published by the ukrainian media now, of course. they cannot be clearly distorted, both consciously and objectively people. they are simply afraid to talk about their real attitude to power, but the other day i came across interesting data from a survey conducted by commissioned by an authoritative publication by a sociological group, rating. the questions were formulated. so, we can assume fairly honest answers from ukrainians. here is the opinion of ukrainians divided who owes whom after the conflict? here we see, 29% believes nato, the eu will owe ukraine for protecting them from russia, again, 56% ukraine after the end of the conflict will owe a test for the assistance and weapons provided. i mean, today ukrainians already understand that this help is not free of charge and for everything. will have to pay. yes, yes, and what about ukraine already take away? what they have taken now is giving away the most

that they have prices - these are human lives, the land was taken away by enterprises a long time ago they took away the economy, they took away natural resources. who owns the grain, that it belongs to ukrainians arable land. all to some companies that are managed in the west, therefore, unfortunately, the problem of ukraine will be how to return its people. this is the main problem of ukraine, how to return the good to the people , because people are already taking away people's lives , the fact of the matter is that they took everything, and then they threw it into the war, france yes, but maybe is there anything to return to the ukrainian people? no , there is only nothing left in ukraine. no , but i want to be more meaningful. i want to return you. uh, as oleg haidukevich says by the fourteenth year, because everything was thought out so that you understand, starting from the nineteenth year and ending with the fourteenth, the united states of america and nato well, nato, we nominally

say this, the vassals of the americans by the fourteenth year should have turned the cream into the largest military base of the united states, hiding behind a nato umbrella, where construction contracts have already been signed, schools for children's sabds. at the same time , they worked, it was not ukrainian specialists, brought by american specialists, who were restored edge-on. we were restoring the old soviet catacombs, connected with the preservation of the safety of modern naval vessels, primarily the nuclear submarine fleet , tremendous work was going on there, and that's it. this was against the background of the red lines, which we said the americans had such a base in crimea. this is control over all of europe over all of russia and

the almost complete degradation of our future future prospects of the russian federation as a state, and even in these conditions, russia spoke, but did nothing thanks to the russian people living in crimea, which russia supported , it was established justice, i was just a witness, i was a participant, i was a witness to these events, i can fully say about all these things, but look. i wanted to bring us back to the first part of our program. when you said that the west began to divide, he understands that today to win in these conditions is impossible, but to save some kind of fruit and do something, he must understand that there should be a platform from which modern ammunition will be launched even under these

conditions, when a special military operation is underway, and nato declared a proxy war by russia. we are criticized by our own e opponents of our patriots, many experts say we are conducting a specially military operation, we are not destroying ukraine and sometimes acting illogically. we 're waiting for the west to open up. we have not yet used modern weapons, and i could here for days to tell a comparative analysis of what we have, what they have, today we have an advantage in everything in training in military-technical equipment tactics, but we understand that today our strength is unequal and our advantage is our quality and skill in these conditions, the collective west that created ? look, alexander

grigorievich spoke about this more than once today, including the russian president, who spoke more under the guise of an allegedly mythical danger. difficult, he says, we are making the best army in the world. he didn't even hesitate to take second place put what he thinks the us armed forces will form on the border. 300.000 while with regard to the baltic states with the capabilities, the restored military infrastructure of the baltic republics of the soviet union, they are able to build up a grouping of 200.000 in three days , while the 101 airborne division of the united states of america with 400 helicopters is located on the border with ukraine there 6 km on the territory of romania ready at any moment, so to speak, to get involved in these things. we understand that today announcing so

called the global lightning strike concept when they are planning 5,000 precision-guided munitions. in conventional equipment, a blow is struck within an hour at a russian critical military facility, er, important communications, and so on, which also nullifies our nuclear one. and our military-technical capabilities this is a serious danger even in these conditions with so many weapons, but not a single country, the air defense system is able to cope , this is a big problem, but we understand when it will be under what conditions and the last security summit speeches and the president of the russian federation and the minister of defense and the minister of defense of china was clearly said lord don't joke, the time for jokes is over. we have something to answer and finishing the answer briefly to your question

about the future of ukraine alexander grigoryevich , who said being one of the most experienced world politicians who foresaw a lot of things. he cannot say everything based on his status and opportunity. i'm a free man who has long been in politics a lot fought a lot, that i saw strongly analyzed, i want to tell you. we have no other task and our leadership has spoken about this more than once, except for the solution of three tasks of a special military operation, the liberation of people living in the southeast, resolving issues where militarization is and resolving issues of denazification of ukraine a. this means that all these issues will have to be resolved before the border. lvov, ivano-frankivsk and other e

subjects of ukraine associated with, so to speak, with the collective west of other options. not if we make some agreements and let's repeat some khasavyurt mistakes. tomorrow we will create the most difficult conditions for our union state for the future of our children and great-grandchildren, and this must be remembered. i think that in these conditions all our leaders understand very well little they say, but believe me, as a military man does. everything is correct. western allies of ukraine are tired of the irresponsible behavior of president volodymyr zelensky, the lack of success in the ukrainian army during the counter-offensive and the endless corruption of the conflict in ukraine had a negative impact on the economies of europe and the united states it is possible that the unity of the european union will begin to collapse if the ukrainian crisis

drags on in connection with this, western countries began to think about possible peace negotiations. the obscurity of the west. more details in our story, the upcoming presidential elections are not the only problem for the kiev regime. soon ukraine may lose both financial and political support from the west, and the reason for this is corruption, money laundering scandals in ukraine are known all over the world. not in vain exactly ukraine is considered to be one of the most corrupt countries. now this issue worries the west and western partners. kiev must be confident in the correct use of the support of the ukrainians. they know very well that the opinion of aid from the united states and europe depends on confidence in them. zelensky must show that corruption is unacceptable. after receiving bribes and theft, at the highest level, it became an officially recognized fact. from the west , heads flew in kiev, a series of resignations and criminal charges began, but vladimir zelensky, the situation is under control. at

least in this, he is trying to convince his western allies. now we have no corruption, because we are all united around our country. many corrupt officials left the country with their money, and we will do our best to keep them there. i am sure that we will overcome this. parallel to this, there are reforms of the anti-corruption system. we have it one of the most powerful in europe, do you believe this is a rhetorical question in the west, after all , financial assistance is decreasing and less and less comes to kiev in addition, in many european countries and in the united states will soon hold presidential elections and ruling koalas. they will have to explain to their voters where the budget money has gone. naimana doesn't want to kick the run and kill the yakodyazh. chapotite, the leaves are shining, the sun, our life is taking shape. i would like to have a

closer look at this world. and skin day to discover something new, she is in this tactic. 'cause we cut it out with love. with love to belarus

, oleg quite rightly noted franz damych about that russia has nowhere to retreat behind, moscow but what can we say about the western curators of the vaselensky regime, because we have noticed both fatigue and total corruption that ukraine has been fighting throughout its independence and zelensky’s ingratitude that outrages many allies, including great britain, to the united states of america . do you think that vladimir zelensky and we will hold on to their seats, it may be beneficial for the west today to change him to a more loyal person. and thus complete this conflict, to be honest, uh, from this set of characters from the soviet space.

there, a person more loyal to the west than zelensky. it’s only perhaps mrs. tikhanovskaya, because in general , she always takes it under her visor, and sits down there when they shake my hand, so, probably, she would be happy to be put in the head of ukraine, but, because zelensky there at least sometimes shakes the rights there, he is indignant, something there demands that he shifts the responsibility for military failures to some kind of insufficient supplies. west tikhanovskaya would probably be there by virtue of her last name, would quietly swallow everything, but if it were serious, then the figure of the ukrainian leader. e is not so significant. i think it's important to put some emphasis here, firstly, the west is still extremely strong. i think everyone understands this, they understand it, thank god, and the leadership of russia, the leadership of the republic of belarus, that , even god forbid , for me as a citizen of ukraine it is important that this ends as soon as possible, of course, but naturally, at the same time it would be for politics. think a man would like it to end sustainable world peace. they're just kind of really.