Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]  BELARUSTV  August 24, 2023 1:05pm-2:06pm MSK

1:05 pm
everything in minsk brest, mogilev and vitebsk regions 48,000 tons harvested with green mass of corn, the country's economy is harvesting and potatoes this year, the yield is 321 centners per hectare. more information at my colleagues at 15:00 on our air see you soon. socio-political talk show in essence today we will talk about the upcoming two large electoral campaigns in the country. if you would like to participate in our
1:06 pm
discussion. here you can see the qr code. point your smartphone at it and you can write here questions or just some comment and the second qr code you see on the screen. this is a subscription to our telegram channel, in which not only what you see on the screen, but also what happens behind the scenes in the studio will work with you for an hour today or kazakov hello that's traditional, when it comes to collection companies, this is always a noisy lot of information that needs to be sorted out for belarusians in the next 2 years. this whole story will be complicated by the fact that they will be going through a new way, we have made changes to the constitution, we have carried out a reform, we er, in fact, hmm, for the first time in the twenty-fourth year on february 25, on the last sunday of february, and we will hold a single
1:07 pm
voting day, when each of us , each voter will have more than one ballot , sergei mikhailovich, in order to start a discussion. let's have a theoretical educational program. and how ordinary belarus saw it for himself. so we went to a referendum, and accepted someone voted against it, but still , by a majority of votes, changes in the constitution . that is, we decided that we would have and the entire belarusian people's assembly in the form in which, and it is now, but appears everywhere. and we, among other things, decided that we would have a single voting day. in general , they made a number of decisions and somehow, it seems, they blamed everything on the legislators, who were supposed to bring it in order. all of our bills at that time were talking about the fact that there are dozens of dozens of normative legal acts here. uh, what now, what do we have half a year left until the day x of the first day x and ​​where did you stumble, what was the most difficult and what still
1:08 pm
needs to be done you right to the center left that all our changes, including those regarding the organization of holding electoral campaigns, have a constitutional legal basis and are related to the past constitutional referent. and i want to say that in general the constitution itself set aside 2 years for bringing our current legislation in line with the constitutional innovations. there are about 100. e laws. we had to, uh, bring it into line with the basic law of the country. and well , according to my subjective assessments, we did not stumble on anything. and we're even ahead of schedule we leave. we are already at the finish line before the start of the electoral campaign, all the key legislative acts are related to the organization of holding e-electoral campaigns in our country. they have already been adopted, signed by the president and have entered into legal force. first of all, of course, this is the electoral code, and plus k the electoral code. i would also note. here, again, taking into account constitutional innovations , such key laws as the legality of the belarusian people's assembly and the law on the main civil society. these are just the basic laws which, in general, well
1:09 pm
, our new political structure is clothed in a completely different legal form in terms of delegation. e candidates, both for deputies of all e, representative bodies of power, from the north of the soviets to the house of representatives, and further in 60 days. after the entire representatives of the power of nomination will be formed, the election of delegates to the belarusian people's assembly, therefore, today from the point of view of law and legislation. yes all uh, legislative we have adopted signed and entered into the theory, it is understandable. everything is written. everything, it seems, as stated by those who are interested in familiarizing themselves. but it seems to you that, well , people are fully aware of what they mean by those very legislative acts, about which you spoke above, the same law on the entire belarusian people's assembly. so how will it work? or so far? there are some other uh , you know, moments that well, explain, well, tell me, i thought that here the right of application would be just for those uh elements that, in general,
1:10 pm
will allow. uh, we even evaluate the quality of the legislator's work in terms of how well citizens will be able to exercise their right to vote both actively and passively without any problems. that is, how to choose and be elected, what was wrong? well then we'll be corrected by mistake. here is the most important thing - alyona, you are asking what the voter should know. here he should know the basic. that as a result of changes in the electoral legislation , no matter who wins the elections to the parliament to local councils in any case break the country to turn it 180 °, he will not be able to do this people should know. this is the happiest election for us, the election holiday. people should not be afraid before it was like in other countries. now you wake up like this. after the elections, the country, the other promised everything in the elections, one thing became a deputy or the president , deceived, broke everything and did it differently now is impossible. why is the constitution updated? the entire belarusian assembly, which
1:11 pm
stands above all, above parties, above deputies, it will regulate these issues. that is we are creating mechanisms to protect our political system from being hacked. it gives information about who will be in this belarusian people's assembly. i mean, look, i'll kill you all. look here. we are actually not in vain on the square. we gathered the leaders of four political parties, these are the four political parties that have been registered. and now they are actually joining our electoral campaign, it turns out, probably, for the first time since gaining independence, when we have a certain party system taking shape and, well, we kind of discussed uh behind the scenes. well, i really have a question. here, look. uh, these are competent people all the time mihailovich who, for example, understand politics in economics. they really will understand why we are creating, for example, the entire belarusian people's assembly, what we wanted to put
1:12 pm
under this constitution how to get out, but on the other hand, i really agree with alexander sergeyevich that people just want, so that nothing changes, but we have four parties. i come to the polls plot i have a question i will vote for the person whom he knows or for the party for a good system of circles we are not lo. the electoral system, what we have done, we created conditions for the development of parties so that they represent different points of view, but the electoral system was not broken by a single-mode constituency, where non-partisanship will matter more. and what kind of person is the party in addition goes, that is, the person looks. this is the leader. this is a person who is an authoritative member of the liberal democratic party in the district further. for why the park nearby is the same authoritative person 4-5 candidates are participating in the elections. and then he can decide for himself, and this authoritative and this authoritative, but this representative of the dpb. rpts communists, and he
1:13 pm
will choose about who to him more alekseevich tell me, tell me all the communists will try to be represented in all the electoral blood. well, the logic is that the party is, well, the power must be a struggle for power , i agree, but uh, before the question i want to say that here are the additions of sergei mikhailovich we have done a tremendous job, when there was a discussion on a referendum in order to minimize in the legislation that is now uh, we got the choice and we uh and the president said that inform the people and get the opinion of our people. what mistakes we could make, they can be, but they will be minimized further on the same work does not stop. we have an ongoing dialogue platform and alena will explain directly to people how to interpret this or that legislation. what mechanisms will be applied with regard to the party system, of course , the communists will be represented in virtually all circles, in all parliamentary districts, we will write even today. if
1:14 pm
you have a topic like the previous one at the start, the electoral company of the communists, they entered it already in the spring, when oleg sergeevich and i and other party members were re-registering. we have reviewed our lines. we have identified those people who, as oleg sergeevich said , are really popular among people, do not just as he is a communist, what are his achievements? according to the main place of work, what problems he solves there in one way or another, and at his place of residence, that is, authoritative people whom we can nominate today, i will not hide either. we have already formed a list that we are working on, with whom the people and the party will support , we are preparing to hold a congress, as soon as the head of state signs a decree, we will immediately, in fact, hold an official meal in a week, where is the congress here again here the specifics will already be a task. what e put forward those candidates in almost 110 constituencies in fact and consider those candidates who will go
1:15 pm
there in order. how many of them i sincerely remember 18,000. uh, local councils and take into account the specifics of more regions. there, not only the city of minsk, but starting from the village district of the regional level, you understand? the most important thing is who you people have not elected, and it will not get worse in the fifth column in the elections. no, that is, the communists will win, for god's sake, they have their own program, we have our own, but no one will break it worse. most the main thing is that the fifth deck does not participate in the elections. you understand, we removed. uh, for the first time in 30 years, a practically external fact, you know how it was, they were like cockroaches, they climbed, public organizations, political parties, and everything is financed by the west. now, if the peak was chosen, but thank the people, god never voted, the end of the country is good comments. the first mistake is that the people do not want , uh, they want changes, but for the better and in a normal civilized way for this, which we have done. that's what alleg was talking about and colleagues, we, uh, did the filtering
1:16 pm
parties. this is fine. you see. we removed what was actually recruited and paid from the outside. and today i am personally satisfied, as a citizen, whom we re-registered today, i know these people as decent people. i know they are not financed from outside. but what is the point and why should belarusians understand it so seriously? we are approaching this issue. it is very important. first, we have precedents in almost all post-soviet republics of bloody revolutions, kazakhstan, ukraine, kyrgyzstan, when countries were thrown back into development, or it was change of leadership, thank god they are scolding from the gkb but the dkb. saved, kazakhstan should say thank you. and what moment for the first time since the second world war the kosovo is not considered. there they took the sovereignty of changing the borders of europe happened by military means. the russian constitution changed this precedent is very scary. i want to draw the attention of our party members. today we have to elect people on the one hand from
1:17 pm
the literate balanced, which means, so to speak, how our president has not to heat up. yes, and when we don't have these problems of an international nature. true , we did not infringe on the religious no one, but on the other hand , those oriented to the national interests of belarus understanding that the ability to succeed is unshakable? these are the politicians of these people. we must support those who today know this kind of jelly, you know. previously , we had a parliament, someone served well as a minister, but we will retire to parliament. everyone knows this. it was like that and we have thank god for the last two e terms, but especially the deadline so let's say people talk on tv earlier. you couldn't invite deputy on television. you were it here, where we have not forgotten, so the next center since the twentieth year. i remember how many deputies left the issue. uh, it means that the officials were frightened, those who hid under the benches, who stood next to them in the squares, so oleg spoke. i spoke to many others, all who stood with their breasts for the country next to the lukashenka, as we are to the end. you should be there, because
1:18 pm
look at the twentieth year. we talked in eliminated the fifth deck. and who else did we eliminate ba. what kind of twentieth year are you didn't exist at all. they were hiding under the varnish last week we licensed the bnf about the gp and thank god now someone will say that there is no opposition lies. here people confuse the opposition with the fifth column. what is the difference between the opposition and the fifth column i will explain in two words the opposition. and this is a normal word. this is an alternative opinion. here is the white russia party. we now want to ask this question. i am an alternative to belarus, but i want a good country. i will stand next to him and defend the national interest. i can argue with him, parliamentarians suffered 105 column seconds, and the fifth column can be compared to a person who came to shat in rugs in the entrance and rejoices, which means that the elevator set fire to the button and rejoices and wants to demolish the house somehow. and i want it to be even better. that's the difference, but the position is needed and will be. yes, sergei
1:19 pm
mikhailovich here. uh, when we voted for changes to the constitution well, objectively they said that this is the constitution that will allow us, uh, to protect the country that we know, love and live in, uh. well whose is this hot-headed man who can take her e to break the so-called one, that is, protection from random people in power, who in the worst sense of the word, but can thoughtlessly do things. what do you think, did it succeed or not? after all , look, but in fact. that's how we have it now, yes, the head of state is the center of power. yes, and the entire belarusian people's assembly parliament - this will be the center. these will be different figures of strength , which, well , will disperse this responsibility, that is, they will bear it collectively, and will the order not be violated, because there will be more different people with different opinions.
1:20 pm
although oleg sergeevich says that we are all here, and we understand each other, but, nevertheless, the communists have one view, and the liberals have a completely different one. well, first of all, as to. in the previous question of political parties, yes, a question related to the inclusion of political parties is the number of entities having right-wing movements of their candidates in elections. yes, it was very debatable within the framework of the work of the constitutional commission. article sixty-nine. yeah, what they led, excluding the minopolitical parties. the political party must generate, firstly, the author's idea is to generate new people who are just capable of not templates. it is not clichés or clericalism that attracts voters to its side. yes, and just give the society those ideas that will be just behind the driver for the further development of both society and the state , the preservation of statehood and the protection of this statehood, if necessary. if there is a threat to national security. and here is the algorithm that has already been formed within the framework of the constitutional construction, when we integrated it, and on today just gives us an absolute prevention of the fact that there will be no random people.
1:21 pm
why because, in parallel, we have also introduced certain protective mechanisms both in the constitution and in the current legislation due to the fact that neither the deputies nor the delegates of the anc. yes, it means that they will not fall into the subjects of civil society. people who have the citizenship of a foreign state of a foreign state. does it have benefits and advantages, yes, which, according to political national religious grounds, one way or another, well, by and large these people are affiliated with, uh, external stakeholders, and plus the vns formation algorithm itself, 1/3 1/3, 1/3. here are all three branches of government: the legislative, the executive , the judiciary, here are the local councils and from the actors of civil society. it just allows us to achieve, firstly, this balance, where there will be none. generally. yes, regardless of what political views to adhere to, this or that citizen. yes, but it won't be. here's a skew in terms of numbers. and most importantly, in principle, all these people. let them adhere to different political platforms, but they all stand on the inviolability of the constitutional order on civil accord, and on the development of our society and state. in fact. you are a
1:22 pm
fairly new person in public politics. well, whatever it is. for us, this is absolutely normal. eh, here. well, i'll ask, again, stupid questions that people may have, who , for example, want to vote for the russian orthodox church. yes, do you consider yourself an opposition first question second question, when you go to parliament, well, or, for example, your deputies will go to parliament, which should be, because, well, as it were, you are fighting for power. will there be a separate faction? will there be a separate group? how will it all be? i ask this question to everyone. just like in this case, you are the speaker. how this whole story will be with us is now being built in parliament. how do you see it? because i perfectly understand that the next parliament. either way, it will be different. you know, belarus from the moment it was adopted in a referendum the constitution again arouses interests primarily among the countries of the post-soviet space. so this is a rather serious historical
1:23 pm
moment. these are elections on the single voting day not only for parliament, but also for local councils, and of course. she is a political field. uh, parties disappeared. the phantoms are the people represented in this studio. including those who responsibly understand life, the fate of the country, its population and the experience of these people is enough to make informed decisions in a system that has no position or party there is no power. uh, we have these two terms, will the liberals take the forces at all? thicker sits at the screen and says, so they all support lukashenka what position is told for fools, who does not understand the elected president? l to pick up and not support the president when i removed
1:24 pm
the people, but at the same time we have different programs, and for example, i consider myself an alternative to white russia rpts and communists are alternatives to you, yes, we have a different program and there is nothing bad, but this is fair competition good enough alternative in terms of ways to achieve different programs and so on, but i believe that they support public deputy communists, they supported the ninety-sixth year, but in a way , including people will, uh, will see successful people people who have achieved something in their lives position with this position will be considered the economy. we all have different views. here is rpt's view. i considered the economic program. it differs from our own communists. political system of different view i stand for party lists
1:25 pm
for proportional elections belarus against this alexander nikolaevich how do you see yourself in the future, if a your political campaign ends in success and your representatives are, well, in those places, in general, for which you are a faction that has a corresponding deputy group, or we will be a faction to make appropriate changes, we will come forward not only with the proposals of those people who are elected, we will discuss with all political parties. but uh, this is what colleagues are trying to convey to our listeners, that this is all will be aimed at preserving what is here to start anyway, because now i want to say the main thing now is the fourth party to give the floor. i no longer have a pit
1:26 pm
position more than all the deputies most i wanted to add. let's say we don't have the concept of a faction in parliament yet. well , let's say we have 11 representatives in parliament , one, let's say in the soviet republic. that is, we are already merging it. no one forbids us, let's say white russia, for example, or the russian orthodox church, join a faction, for example, with a certain idea of ​​the communists. this a normal process, but it is people who vote military secret, so that you understand it easier, in connection now the public, which relies on representatives of the authorities, so i speak objectively. uh, so, uh, even with a complete monopoly of some party there, we will elect parties that will cooperate constructively. but what is the crux of the matter. that's right lecture noticed and correctly supported by colleagues. for example , they are developing some kind of laws related to entrepreneurial activity, to say, i want a more liberal moment. want support, and seek communism. no, we must protect pensioners. we say more.
1:27 pm
1:28 pm
this is what alexander sergeevich has repeatedly said, the opposition is an alternative, that is, initially the lpb is already an opposition, and the ruling party, belaya rus well, again, we take a cut of social alternatives to power, either somehow or really, well, for example, a club in which everyone has its own voice, but at the same time everyone expresses it in the early world, and then they vote for some content, or the majority and the majority, but firstly, not party in power to turn on, they only say, well , i say. yes, yes, we do not hide and declare this that we are a party of supporters everywhere of our country. and here is also a question, because everyone else, so we are the president too, but people do not mean who will come to the polling station if they support the president, they will only vote for the white rukarov, it was also about the fact that you are a party that supports the president
1:29 pm
countries are a question of the esculoi. if we are talking about what we think for the future at 10-15-20 years ahead. that is, over time, you will also support the head of state. whoever is in this post, we are talking now at a certain moment at a certain stage in history. here we are now exactly what we see in order to maintain unity to preserve the integrity of the inviolability of our constitutional order. we need to rally around our national leader now, because the conditions in which we are now we see the level of threats that we have on the outer contour and we see the level of threats which is being created within the country, and it is thanks to the unshakable will of our president that we have managed to survive. in 1920 and now, we are simply obliged to support our president, to pay near him, and in order to prevent the repetition of the events that took place in 2020, firstly, if we are talking about a political party, then it
1:30 pm
must build its policy and work on some platform. do not remember the parties that worked for the people they do not exist today in russia, therefore it is absolutely correct lukashenka's position, he relies on the entire belarusian society, he was no party at that time, the communists. well, it's absolutely normal for the communists to want to make the main parties. lukashenka simply does not care. now well done belaya rus, who is comfortable with the option for a boss. yes , but the whole belarusian society is correct. today, this objectively questions have been consolidated. swipe around the leader, because first he provided peace in our land. second in period. such here a-a. a serious geopolitical rift, and conversations provide our viewers with such i didn't get the impression that we now have political parties. we have included yes in the constitution and they are the only ones who will shape the political trip in the country and everything will be signed by the political platforms of the political
1:31 pm
parties. i would like to draw your attention to the fact that the vns is just the body above, it is represented by the body of people's power, which forms strategic directions and implements the strategic directions for the development of the state society in the medium and long term and adopts policy documents. yes, the basics, but domestic and foreign policy , the concept of national security, military doctrine, and so on, based on the algorithm for the formation of the anc. persons who are absolutely apolitical and not in any political community can enter there as delegates. by and large, this will also be a direction, of course, for management in future activities. yes in within their own, but a political platform, but the technical papers will be accepted by the vns, and the people who will enter as delegates and not necessarily there, i want to add more. what is it? crazy that the entire belarusian assembly of still
1:32 pm
high or white russia is the program of the party. and now, let's say. here is the communist party, we are forming an election platform already on the basis of the program and taking into account the geopolitical situation that is developing around our country, that is , certain nuances and taking into account modern elements will be included in this platform, and they will necessarily united for sorry for all applicants, but each region may have its own specifics. here's alexey nikolaevich here's to you tell me, please, i understand perfectly. what strategy does the deputies of the party come to, for example, parliament, how they will work, for example, at the russian people 's assembly, but i understand perfectly well that local elections deputies of different parties come to well , relatively speaking, to some area. we also think that if, for example, a communist candidate wins in my district, neighboring candidate. cleaned, and in another belarusian, then positions at least on economic
1:33 pm
issues should somehow be canceled. well change. yes, because. well, if we want to change the situation in the economy on a global level, we probably need to show how this is done. at this level, for the district, respectively, kirill, i also want to return. we ourselves, of course, when the commission worked, complicated this process a little more complicated as far as the single voting day is concerned. it's no secret that before the man, the presidents we exposed worthy people. e fight for a seat in parliament. uh, and if he didn't win by force, certain circumstances of the population didn't support him, we represented this person, uh, in the local elections. now the task is very serious. here, within the framework of what kirill said, that he is tough. yes, the exam is tough and we must select strong people who will act together on the platform. do not hesitate, there will also be an applicant who listens to everyone. yes, yes , parliamentary representation, and right there
1:34 pm
reinforcements are needed to be at the level of local soviets, this will really be. well, the interests of our people and i want to say, the task becomes more complicated. yes, our candidate is going to the polls with the party's political platform. but also, don’t forget that it’s not only necessarily those people who support the communist party, for example, that, on my personal example, it was in the district when real people voted for me and i, in the course of my work, for example, even those who voted against. they changed their minds because they judge deputy for affairs, you understand, and this is also quite a very serious aspect. we are talking about electoral campaigns. now i will give my own opinion. i will not name all this company that we will have. well, actually start there in a few weeks
1:35 pm
political for one reason, because in my personal opinion the politician. in our country , there is only one president, all other people, managers, officials, functionaries. don't be offended by me. they are all necessary and necessary , uh, work, but it seems to me that we really are now faced with such a certain a situation when you need to understand, after all, what awaits us, because there are a lot of words of political politicians political parties, political leaders began to sound igor and when you write texts, the word political does not depress you in our context in the sense that we are really building well, i'm not afraid of the word, some special political society. even the vns is such a body that, well, is not present in other constitutions in other states, and we used to be shy. well, for example, in england there is no such constitution. but we should have one. yes why we don’t copy england, so we create our own standard of a rule of law
1:36 pm
state and our own political system, moreover, we are at the very beginning of this path, when alexander lukashenko said that he does not give up his beloved. before that , he said that belarus is on well a little, naive, it was not about people being eliminated, and it was about political naivety. this one is in my subjective opinion, regarding what kind of electronic company we are preparing. i am essentially. i agree that it is also in my opinion, and not quite political, it is rather organized. here i am cleaning alexander lukashenko and not he is holding a meeting on agriculture and says for us now an important issue this year is to work out a mechanism for attracting machine operators for seasonal work for the future , alexander grigoryevich is doing the same in most areas he is working on. well, for the future, i will say how directly i am deeply convinced, despite the fact that alexander grigoryevich panchenko said that he had not yet made a decision, but i believe that he will participate in the presidential race closer, because the country is in a certain great danger
1:37 pm
nothing happens in this situation. what is moving towards decentralization of power, on the contrary, power should be more centralized without e, blurring the authority of responsibility, and so on, even if you imagine that through the presidential election of alexander grigorievich he decides not to run. but i think that one way or another we will have a successor directly named , named or indirect. and now, after two electoral cycles. at best, everything that we are doing now, and political parties, all the belarusian people's assembly, etc. and so on. only then, at best , in 10 years. all this will become relevant as we develop competencies. how to hold these elections, how people all act and decide that it is not worth the political forces to take the nearest company seriously. oleg sergeevich said approximately the same thing. i want to support the rights, but for what political parties do you issue entire broadcasts the question. and for what it is not needed explained, for
1:38 pm
what, so that the president was never alone one is not in terms of support for him in the twentieth year, there were millions , but when we do not have a developed political system, when our parties are not developed, when we do not have deputy groups in parliament, this is not very visible, therefore, in the mendel space they created the appearance, that there is only one president. and this is a lie, when the leaders of the four parliamentary parties stand next to the president, i call a spade a spade, each of which is the leader of the people behind them. i don't come out and say how now we stand we won't stand. lukashenka and i are hands away from the country, even though we have different views or take russia state duma putin four factions of the liberal democratic party of the communist party of the russian federation just russia all different argue in the elections russia will be hit everyone stands together, as one and then the political system becomes stronger and the second moment. what are parties for? we should never tell a fairy tale that a time will come in the country when everyone has the same
1:39 pm
opinion - this is a lie, even in the family the mother-in-law is always against it. this means that the wife can be in a relationship against her husband, but the concept is now a period. well igor called there organizationally. i don't agree with that, but rudely, uh, i still think that this is an electoral political company and we will no longer have four political parties. here we are going through certain studies. you even understand becoming for the future. what igor said, and it will be a huge help on er, the future of the electoral campaign. whatever choices. forgive alyona alexandrovna, it didn’t happen until uh for our people , the keystone to uh question and the cornerstone here, the party, 1/2 third in relation to lukashenka. what did they end up with? they look after everything. then. only then do they begin to read further. this is how long it will remain. yes? let's
1:40 pm
get organized a bit. kolya, we talked about the organization. yes, the cec, too, uh, well, it will fall. such a serious layer of work. you are already preparing, after all , the technical issues themselves are starting, related to the fact that i have already said that some regions will be removed four ballots at a time. what don't you expect? well, no, i'm sure that there will definitely not be a collapse. eh, nonetheless. we we must understand that we are now uniting the two most complex technical companies. the fact is that if there are 110 parliamentary circles, that is, 110 deputies, we elect what concerns local soviets - this is more than 18,000, so a colossal responsibility and a colossal amount of work will fall precisely on the organizers. this will require, of course, a huge concentration and endurance. because if we are talking about the election campaign separately, electoral actions. they have already begun, that is, literally tomorrow
1:41 pm
there is a meeting of the central commission, at which we establish the average number of electors of sciences for election to the house of representatives, then until october 1. we form these constituencies into a chamber present until november 1, and a friend into local councils, and then we come to a single voting day. as already stated in this studio no later than 60 days after the unified vote. we should already have the first composition of the air force in order to assemble. composition of the supreme council we need to elect the members of the council of the republic we need to elect vns representatives from civil society from local councils and thus we will finish this whole long cycle, only at the end of april 24, so there is a big distance to be , as far as the technical organization is concerned, and i would also like to note that the elections are an exam for power. e, depending, but there are two parts of this exam, often everyone talks about the first one, that the elections are dependent on the results of the elections, respectively, the people show support
1:42 pm
for the topic of the decisions of the work that is being carried out current acting power. so. and, if the second part is the turnout in the elections. here, the turnout at the elections shows the maturity of the political society, political literacy , legal culture, about which we have been talking so much lately, and much is being done. it is necessary to show justice that we have matured, yes, yes, yes, but nevertheless , the work to increase poly literacy needs to be constantly carried out . always were more interesting. that is, e people believed that they believe. i am convinced. that it is much more important to elect a head of state than a deputy of local soviets, it is clear that we have tried and are trying to reverse this trend, thereby. yes, the same redistribution of powers, which are enshrined at the constitutional level, but show that
1:43 pm
those people who make decisions on the ground. in general, no less important. you just understand. uh, sometimes people don't really know their deputation. here, for sure. i think that the new composition of the parliament must change , among other things, because the people who elect their deputy must see him next to them on tv in a newspaper next to the president, you understand? i here how thought that the deputy? uh, he says, gukevich is unknown to his voters, probably known, but, and sergeevich, you can also say that there are deputies who are unknown. and that is why this election campaign. it seems to us that it is not important; everything, among other things , depends on how they will work deputies and perhaps just the same party system. she will appear. well, show some discipline. but this is exactly how the parties will add this zest to the elections, which should be good competition, but i would like to say the protection
1:44 pm
of our country. here we are all talking about the turnout of small numbers here. we are the first to go simply to society. no, i'm not right. and sometimes we are abroad, they say, there is no interest in vybor. so, our turnout even in local elections is much higher than in many eu countries. tired of the lies. what are their choices. remove poland, a simple example, today the party is going to the polls there. i'm panning for the second installment, but in fact, every pole knows nothing will change. they can only argue lgbt and abortion and tight pro-american power, that is people, they see nothing is changing. our elections are much more democratic, that's why i even say that we should think about presidential elections. this is the twenty-fifth year that the president is obliged to run for office in the thirtieth. well , look at our presidential elections. we mean any party is obliged to participate and will be sensational for distract sensationalism
1:45 pm
will not. well, i'll answer. take russia , you will understand everything when parliamentary factions go to the presidential elections. no freaks. it is not necessary to participate only parliamentary parties, so my opinion is that we should return to their presidential campaign to tighten the selection. we have not yet introduced this into the constitution, neither from the street, nor homeless people, nor alcoholics, not parasites, not prostitutes, it is not known who is an assistant political force in 2006, he drank vodka and decided to become president of all parties. and if the party they don’t change, but the dtp is obliged to participate in the presidential elections, the ldp party, communist candidates must come out, belarus must also nominate. e, means the president of the country, therefore, all systemic parties. one way or another , they must participate in the presidential elections, and who was decided not depending on the opinion of the leader. the party, uh, the highest body is
1:46 pm
the congress, and how the people decide, that is, you must accept. you must accept, uh, the decision of the congress, or recuse yourself. here is the situation for myself. i want to say that and yet not. i want to say that i am enough. that's enough time already. firstly, we are supported, and both the external and internal courses of the head of state are without reproach, and i’m like, uh, maybe i’m still a beginner politician, but nevertheless, for me, my president or our president, he is a teacher in many positions, and i also i continue somewhere to learn to emphasize a certain novelty for myself, so there is still something to strive for. or maybe the congresses will decide to support only to win there should be competition. it doesn't mean something bad. this fine. we are talking about what in life there should be political people to know and see in elections. generally. right now we have representatives of four parties on the site.
1:47 pm
but you can hear oleg sergeevich and you can hear mr. sokolov. that's what the editor tells me, he says, somehow the other two parties are quieter, after all, you know, i want to approach him from a position. i already we know this is a pit position. yes, we still have more deputies, but the elections will decide everything. you know i want to touch. they started talking about the turnout , it will be higher, lower, and so on. well turnout evaluate the results of this or that company, but i want to say that the time when people say that it is not necessary to go to the polls. it passes and the main goal set by the voter, and first of all by the young voter. we must choose people who will influence the life of the country. yeah, and in order
1:48 pm
to see these people give them the opportunity to participate in the elections. local councils of deputies in parliament lose, including gain some experience of normal political struggle, normal constructive not destructive, here he is right about what he says that we should train to learn how to fill ourselves with bumps and after a few terms come to the conclusion that a full-fledged four -step or four-party system. we still work here are the upcoming electoral campaign. it will show just the same maturity of these four parties that have undergone re-registration, which has registered maturity. in what way , in order for us to talk about how they will participate in the party in the forthcoming company, of course, by way of movement candidates for deputies of various levels start at local levels, ending with the national assembly of the house of representatives
1:49 pm
of the national assembly of the republic of belarus is one moment the second moment. we see that representatives of the party will participate in the work of precinct commissions at all levels and the third point. we see that representatives of the party will, e, work or electoral commissions will participate. what is the quality of observers, if we say that we have only 18,000 various commissions, 18,000 commissions will be created there. need to think. how many party members do you need to have in order to represent yourself in all these elections, that is, in this entire election campaign. this will just show the maturity of the party's readiness. learn to political struggle in the future. uh, showing even attracting supporters to its side and that this party, among other things, could nominate candidates , two organizational issues. first uh. we know for sure that in 1920, members of the election commissions were seriously intimidated, will there be enough people now,
1:50 pm
who will serve on these commissions? this is the first question, the second question, what will we have with observers, both international and domestic, because this question has always been for us. well, let's just say it's not very nice. here are the two questions. how will our airlines decide yes? yes, well, well, as it were, well, first of all, with regard to the members of the commission today , we see that, and already the panic of the twentieth year, certain. yes, people are aware of the importance of these events, they are aware of the need to participate in them, therefore, with commission. we see no problems with commissions, more will be formed and there will be a competition, believe me. as for observers, we traditionally invite international observers, but serious questions arise regarding western monitoring institutions such as the osce, which has its own recommendations for each country, they apply different standards and, uh, let's put
1:51 pm
it this way. by voicing the fact that they are watching the elections for compliance with their national legislation to some kind of hmm internal norms. we see that this is not entirely true. happens, but they come , e, often prepared by resolutions, and often they do not assess the choice of national legislation, but some international rules and norms that are international, because that can also be called the same thing. here is the first choice, when it can be opened and persuaded. finally, we don’t care about your opinion, just like you never ask my opinion, and the elections of the polish seven to the german ones will be such that you told us to not care about them seriously, so today we must tell the truth. and here is the fifth column. this is an external influence, when they came under supervision and tried to break
1:52 pm
the country. they are not democratic elections. they need one thing, if you do it, they said so to our diplomats. make the deputies the fifth column, and we will admit that this election will not be useful. my always put forward a sufficient result of observers with observation, in fact it will be enough for russia to come cis africa neighbor from europe will come, there is no parliament, or rather parliaments, then, not the ruling party a bunch of opposition deputies who support us in europe and hello to everyone. uh, the most correct opinion is when when the observers are local, it is the local observers who can answer. were these elections? they were honest, objective, this is the most objective assessment that should be carried out only for ourselves, but not for anyone , not for europe, not for someone for myself . in any case, it’s also a political issue and
1:53 pm
the question of how ready we are for dialogue or no alexander grigoryevich, he seems to be talking about this very often lately emphasizes that we are generally not closed from anyone, some are more, of course, assholes, but sometimes you also need to work with assholes. will be working. that's about it constructiveness is not to come and uh, not even what to teach the existing standards to blackmail the country, whether we recognize them or not. there is no one in international law who doesn't care about the fact of the matter more than they do. i, as a person who loves to offend everyone around with his thoughts, only you want, well, one of one of and i'm listening, as if with all due respect to every political party, but i mostly hear a statement that is more characteristic of the public. unity but still but hmm
1:54 pm
but politics and parties. in my opinion. this is a little different, what i have again, we are increasing legal political literacy. for starters, i don't think so. i will explain what i, for example, consider legal literacy, and not what the osce writes there. uh, recommendations in advance are all quite obvious political literacy is when a conditional round takes place on the eve of the presidential election. you understand what is there, and one candidate alexander grigorievich and five others , and i see the pickets of each in my head. i have the following thought. so it means approximately in the country, for example, about 20% do not want to vote for lukashenka , let's say for me as a person who is profitable for lukashenka to sign for each of them, so that 20% of these votes are blurred between five opposition candidates, you understand, yes, and then one of them conditionally there oleg sergeevich received his conditionally there, there is five percent think, yeah, again percent. i'm not profitable political, i'm better at all here. this is politics, and so, when we will meet to
1:55 pm
understand these processes, and those who vote, and those who put forward their candidacies, and those who evaluate, then this process. this is where the political movement begins. we are sold at the beginning of the way you did in the twentieth. i didn't do that in 1920, but i think that politically it was the right thing to do after the elections. that's an axiom. yes, under what after each election should be the revolution is worse, the overturn, and we must come to the elections that were held in the twenty-fourth year, the elections of parliamentary local councils became better, new deputies were elected new impetus for legislative work, new impetus for the work of local soviets this is what it strives for and it is political competition that should lead to this. it must be you must come to these places in these positions , people who know why they go there. you see, again, when we talk about the fact that all four parties, it seems, as it were, but with something with their own thoughts and views for some. and the questions there are also savings. i don't
1:56 pm
know, there for sports for art. well, globally , at the same time, we, uh, start up an important point, that again , this is an ideal picture, then what, uh, for sure? i'm not sure exactly, but i admit that not all those who are members of the party, but 100% share its values. and some of her hmm there will be even without a party, you know, they will. they may be using this party in order to take a certain position after having well, some weight, especially since now i understand, no, a normal phenomenon sergeevich, but nevertheless a member of the party, he still must in any case express the interests of his party and act with it. the only thing is that here we are in public areas lately, there should be a modern presentation, taking into account appearance.
1:57 pm
there are four parties here. they are all the same, as it were , at the same time, of course, the truth. here we are accustoming voters to agree that everyone disagrees, economically completely disagrees no mars engels, we still don’t need to argue with the nation. that's what you do, that we want to accustom the voter. elections are some fight and stretch the country. remember the presidents told you at the russian meeting, do not pull the country in different directions. here the struggle should not be dragged out, we argue but we are patriotic, i joked, but we are also for pensioners. why do you disagree with belarus ? what does it mean to say, belarus , here i am, i opened the program of belarus. i respect belarus, this is a good party, but we have an economy. i think business is more supportive of taxes. i have a different view on education taxes, my view of health care, but within the framework of the constitution, i never
1:58 pm
i will speak like the fools we liquidated against free health care against free education. i will support lukashenka in many issues. i want to bring you to the conclusion that a voter coming to the polling station supporting lukashenka does not mean that everyone will vote only for belarus or only for the communists or only for the tcp he will speak, so i am for the president, but i like the program of the communists. i like the white russia program. that's what i invented. we must correctly and competently conduct an electoral campaign and to approach the twenty-fifth number to form people's opinions is no longer just there for a week, that a in the period and before the agitation, that is, the practical work of their work through various application forums. the media is also a position . one gets the feeling that we will have only political representatives in deputies, in fact. here, how our system is built there, will it change or not? we have a non-partisan can in the deputies. damn, i'm just
1:59 pm
saying right, yes, because in fact it turns out that we have four parties. now practically one of them is chosen. who do we have maybe according to the new law, of course, the fact is that we have the internet. one of the topics, as already discussed a little in the first part of the program, and we have one -contact constituencies, as for elections to the house of representatives and to local councils of deputies, the system is the same here, therefore, and the political party is another characteristic of a candidate, but first of all his characteristic is his personality his merits his labor path. and that's exactly what they're paying attention to. e voters , moreover, i will say that for the campaign more funds are allocated than before, we have e twice, and somewhere even more increased e the size of election funds, so the campaign campaign. we expect a brighter than it was before. a? well, of course it's still here. it all depends on the candidates, i want them to be more active and present themselves as voters more brightly so
2:00 pm
that when we come to the polling station. we didn't have any more questions. who will we vote for? yes, that's it, these are the people will vote for the individual, and not for the party, of course, absolutely i would prefer i personally have, uh, slight fears that there are people in the nearest electoral company. e much more e with great pleasure will vote for someone non-partisan than a party member just in case, because what is there in society that we are talking about the maturity of the party. and this is true. after the holiday of our state, we, e, go to tour completely throughout the republic under the auspices, belarus of justice. you already have hydrigades not only representatives of the deputy. i've been away for a long time, bye. yep, that means the second one. moment i do not agree, but four parties have been re-registered. what does this say 5,000 years, at least. we have confirmed structures
2:01 pm
across the country, which means that support is already there. and by the way, the state did a lot for the party with this law. i say, well, anyway , i’ll finish the thought, i was interrupted a little, belarusians always vote for successful people and more than once. here. uh, the electoral company is talking about, here, watch the people that are at the polling station. uh, standing at the booth and reading biographies and watching you know information and advertising there media telegram channels can be formed, well, a lot of opinions, but for the most part. still, people choose normal constructive successful people vote for those who like them. it seems they understand and those who will not let them down everything that i can at the very end. well, please be careful and form your own opinion. and for
2:02 pm
this, be interested, learn more and look more carefully, including what are you looking at during tik tok, we are used to seeing who, who entertains, who pleases, that's why we now have a term of stars on television. well, that's what it's called , and it seems to me that this is the epoch when rock stars will appear among the deputies as well. and does not matter. he will speak brightly or act brightly. just watch what he does. and what does he say.
2:03 pm
2:04 pm
nature culture faith people what secrets are hidden by the greatest shrines of christianity all the churches all the shrines on the territory of the grand duchy of lithuania on
2:05 pm
the territory of sudzhasno and so most of belarus what bore the name of st. michael arkhan, that is, it is such. well i don't think so spiritually, this may be a coincidence on the character and destiny of a person. that is why the bible calls to be joyful sometimes earthly joy, it sometimes passes very quickly, and the joy that a person receives from communion with god in the church is joy. it somehow turns out that fills every day of his life. why are bells ringing? it is known that bells are a tradition of ringing, right? the shape of the bells came to us more western , as it were, traditions from the catholic one, what is in the orthodox, how would the execution be

13 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on