burning with family capital funds from 2020 , from the twentieth year, it is allowed to use it ahead of schedule. that is, immediately after the appointment , more than half of the families have already used these funds 70,000 solutions - this is approximately 55%, while the majority of families and the main direction, of course, is the improvement of living conditions. 83% of those who applied send their funds to improve their living conditions , 10% for medical services and 7% for education. surely you keep various statistics on demographics, and which ones the regions of belarus are considered the most large, and why the three regions with the largest number of children are brest, minsk and gomel . 80% of large families raise three children, the remaining 20% ​​are four or more children. uh, the most-most large families.

we have 13 children. in total , there are two such families in belarus. they are in the brest region and the minsk region, 31 families are raising 10 children. well, to complete the picture , five or more children are brought up in six and a half thousand families. well, what other effective measures of such a state support for large families? and in belarus, this is what really helps and supports our demographics for large families. e, comprehensive measures are applied in all areas , guarantees or benefits are provided. well, for example, to improve housing conditions , state support is provided, preferential loans are allocated. free grants for the construction of housing acquisition renovation. well, this is in addition to family capital. when receiving education, for example, e in kindergarten, a 50% discount is provided from the cost

nutrition. uh, free school meals. well 50% discount with the cost. e for textbooks , annual large families receive financial assistance to prepare for school. uh, if we assume a family is poorly provided, then the state targeted social assistance is provided. this is a one-time payment, monthly and free food for children under 2 years old. there are tax incentives. there are pension benefits. there you can for example, here is one of the measures labor guarantees. e can be illuminated, if let's say 7 m three children or more under 16 years old, then one of the parents has the right to an additional day off of the week, this day off is paid. and of course, uh, if, let's say, a woman gave birth, gave birth to five children, raised these five children, then such women are awarded

the high state award of the order of the mother.

hello , you are watching the program, say, do not be silent studios victoria popova and tatyana shcherbina and today we have a guest military expert, the mouthpiece of totalitarian propaganda. boris rozhin hello boris this is how you imagine yourself from ancient

times in russia, your subscribers are very well known in livejournal. you had a lot of subscribers today in the telegram channel kasat, which is called about a million, to be exact 832.000 today. tell our viewers briefly. how did you find yourself in the epicenter of military-political journalism? i lived in sevastopol oh, in the next soviet union then it was in the period of ukraine uh, in the fourteenth year, when the events in kiev began, the coup d'état took place, uh, the events in crimea began like the crimean spring, the russian spring. that is, it is called differently, but it turned out i planted then it turned out at the rally on february 23, which was against the coup d'état in kiev well, since then it began to get involved. already in such a more open political life, we then began to raise funds for the coordinating council for the defense of sevastopol people. well, they were looking for an opportunity

through whom they could transfer money for the entire historical militia. i began to collect it to transmit and gradually began to get involved in such political activity, and then it outgrew. naturally already in delivery military ammunition and other good things to the donbass for the militia there are slavs, slavyansk-kramatorsk, there are other areas, that is, and gradually my information activity also changed in this direction, that is, it became more. politicians , your informational activity leads you to the fact that you have such a high number of subscribers, does this bother you or not? or is it in general, uh, the result that came out. no, well, at the beginning it was nice. yes, that's what you do, it's interesting to people. yes, then even when they started to recognize it on the street. uh, a little even began to irritate over time, and then now it is already perceived. well, as hands on the phenomenon, that is, because the main thing, in fact, is work. that is, if there is a result that well likes you and likes others. well , then you are not useful for the benefit of

others spending time. they say what exactly they brought out on their pages. uh, the wording of the term polite people, which is now called russian soldiers. it's true, yes by fault it appeared formally from my blog, because as it was february 25, 26. in one of the ukrainian publications , a message appeared that people politely entered the tower of the simferopol airport. all settle i this expression. from the ukrainian media, i beat that polite people politely come in and politely ask, everything changes. here, in fact. i beat this topic, then it was already from the blog pages. this story has already spread without any of my efforts. that is, formally, as if i launched, but promoted. it's already on the world level that people are being watered, as if it weren't me, well, create such a meme of this magnitude. yes it is nice, of course, well, you boris didn’t serve at all, as your subscribers write, yes, and your name is colonel kosat. uh, as we know, this is a literary character, that is, well,

i kind of have a family of military personnel, uh, my grandfather, the moscow marine, stalingrad was defended by my father. uh, commanded a brigade of submarines. and i would go down this line. unfortunately, my liver failed. i had jaundice in childhood, so the military school took me with this, no matter how they took it, and accordingly. i did not think that i was a crooked path of fate sees again on some kind of military affairs, but it so happened that after the sixteenth year. well, although i didn’t serve directly, as in the army, i managed to help around military affairs, including the armed forces in the fourteenth year, and even more so now, when supplies go to the regular army, as if at zero dues, respectively, as it were, as if in some form the gestal would be closed, the family business would continue. yes, and your subscribers are brutal military men and i read and write. so what if he didn't add up to his score matches my assessment. i'll be very yes, but the garden fan's alias

is a pseudonym that was taken. this is a novel by american writer dan simmons of muscle fantasy songs. he was a nickname from there and i never thought that he would become any widely known. but when it happened to change, something was too late. in this regard, i was curious to rewind the tape back. here's to our events that took place with us in the twentieth year and see what the colonel's draft is. assad wrote on their pages and so on our events. the augustows called the belarusian maidan, why maidan and not otherwise? well, because maidanov, in essence, this concept itself is a concept of a coup d'état inspired from the outside, as it were, by investing certain resources objectively, existing problems in society, that is, he always uses any maidan. well, and any economic social problems internal to them, in order to ensure, uh, a change of power in the interests of external beneficiaries. actually. i saw it on ukraine when there was an orange revolution.

you could see it in georgia when shevardnadze sparkled in serbia when we overthrew the horse, that is, well, many such examples in the 2000s could still be caught and could be seen. we see what this leads to, we saw what it led georgia to the 2008 war. by the way, in this, by the way, there is another similarity with ukraine , that the result of the euro-maidan was a war on this, which, in the donbass there, the reign of saakashvili became a war in ossetia just recently. again, another date was cool. here again georgians are the same now, despite the fact that relations with russia are complicated there, they all understand this very well that the wine of this wine is the main culprit. it was saakashvili who sits in such a popular opinion that if lukashenka had faltered in belarus then in 2020 now what is happening in ukraine would happen, you support me, i’m sure that well, i actually look at the events in belarus and the events in kazakhstan that happened not long ago before the start of your way, like the preparatory stage, when well the west was

it is interesting to set fire to the borders of russia in the ethereum, so that russia would be more difficult to react to what is happening in ukraine , that is, it is clear that if now in minsk there would be conditional sitting on this tikhonov’s in kazakhstan , some kind of civil war and chaos would blaze on the huge russia huge from kazakhstan this would greatly complicate the action of russia more than it is now. and of course, there are many. naturally, it depended on the person whom many had already written off at that time, including in russia there were circles that zaya. what why is he old? he does not understand. now he would have lost. i remember these moods, but in honor of alexander lukashenko , he did not seem to flinch, that is, he really stood up, although not under the cries of this crowd. here, many of you did not even understand that this was some kind of last farewell performance. they then gloated so much, and then about a month later they already realized that the ship had turned in the other direction. they did not catch the trend in time, that everything has changed. do you remember your mood, that is, many moments you look when the flags of the state are there and

they began to pluck and occupy. uh, administrative buildings, some officials, started running across there. well, it’s just that this whole thing is all about libya, syria, when there, during the attempts of these states to seize power, someone ’s system begins to crumble under external attacks, and again, it’s like this whole situation itself, like a test for the system, that is , how strong it is in fact, that is, when in a quiet time, well, it seems to me that it exists, everything is fine. yes but here crisis, he allows her everything, both strengths and weaknesses, that is, we all saw, yes, the weaknesses of the exposed system, but nevertheless, she turned out to be viable enough so that the security forces did not flinch this attack, unlike, say, when they saw what happened in ukraine when the omon knelt down, but first well, why did they knelt down, because lukashenka didn’t hand over the enforcers, when he was demanded of him by asking these riot policemen there, uh karaeva let’s publish in due time gave up when dispersed the camp they are children. e in kiev and

after that, when she ran out of pressure, he pretended that he had nothing to do with it. this is the fault of the leadership of the kiev omon there. and after that, of course, these people are watching. well, if we are being handed over so easily, then why do we need this relationship again, that is, how, uh, the leaders are building relations with yanukovych’s property, they managed to put pressure on him and force him to do exactly the way he did, precisely because he had there, well, roughly speaking, golden loaves, and us president. in general, he is not an oligarch. well, it's two in two. why on the one hand? yes, indeed, yanukovych, uh, was very dependent on oligarchic circles, primarily takhmetov akhmetov. and they worked all the time and at the us embassy he was directly threatened that he would lose his assets in the west, and given that akhmetov sponsored and why yanukovych was naturally through akhmed there was also pressure on yanukovych and his entourage, and on the other hand, yanukovych himself was rather weak. he. uh. he is everything it was justified by the fact that here he is, i did not want blood. i won't give it there. such orders,

as before, gave the order to disperse the maidan when both the minister of the interior zakharchenko and the prosecutor came to him. and they had a ready-made plan writer. which one said? i won't sign. no matter how i take it, as if it were a sin on my soul, well, what did it lead to? yes, that is, he was afraid to bother his hands, then he shouted from rostov stop when he saw the consequences of all this. here he is, yes, and he gave up just like he gave up in 2004. although he won elections, but still under pressure from the west, he agreed to the third round with u-, uh, the tenant, which he lost, that is, he then surrendered power. here, well, that is, these are certain, apparently, viktor fedorovich had some problems with the psychotype. well, this led to ukraine. to very serious consequences. that is, well, here, why you can even blame something, because he chose him then from potential replacements. he chose yanukovych , probably, he did not imagine that events could develop so rapidly, but you know, that they paid attention, although the mouthpiece of totalitarian propaganda, but you never give

such directly colored ones. uh, tips or opinions. you always adhere to clear official information, which is, that is, if you see the system crumbling, then you will not say, there it must be supported, caught there and do not call anywhere. if you say, that's when you see that the system is crumbling, that is, and say that everything is fine. that is, well , to engage in some kind of blocking, as if it makes no sense, that is. well, if everyone sees that on well listen stick to being so pragmatic. realism, that is, it shows what is, that is, there is, as it were, a position, and for many authors, that is, either everything is fine, everything is fine, yes, but there is a position that everything is bad, everything is gone, that is, well, there you in russia very often there are just such excesses in both directions. i stick to more uh, well, realistic reflection, really. that is, if there is one's way, that is, there is a victory. i say, well, i show victories, there are some failures and mistakes. i mean, i'm talking about failures and mistakes. well, you see, it is very difficult, how to stay without a biased no, well, as if, i didn’t know that i was generally such an impartial

non-observer who sit no, of course. well, in my case, i'm a biased person, because i'm kind of, well, sticking to my side in this war. yes, but if we evaluate that's exactly what is happening, then there yes i, of course, what needs to be shown, both good and bad. yes, for this it can fly, how to stop from the other side. well, i got used to it back in the fourteenth year. well remember your morning twenty. 2 february, well, i kind of knew that the troops would be. that is, i overslept at the beginning of the war, because i knew that active hostilities would begin in the morning. well , this is in the morning . well, i overslept for half an hour, then i stand and already, as it were, from the special forces of the day, when work began for you. this was expected by a lot of people. they say that it's like a sledgehammer on the head, but you just said that you knew that the ultimatum would begin, it was clear that it would not be accepted, because the west, as it were, gave yasny

the answer is that no, they will not agree, that is, either the war was beneficial. that is, if they then followed the path of fulfilling the minsk and einsteinmar formulas, of course, there would be no war. that is, well, there the conscious all this was sabotaged. well, it's all a confession. well, then many did not understand this further then, but then once merkel the dutch admitted that, in principle, this was used all the time to prepare for war. well, after that, there is nothing much to say there, that is, when ah, they have already begun to spin, the last spiral of the crisis. that there is already somewhere on the twentieth twenty -first, in principle, it was already clear that there would be a war about the beginning, i still want to return it. here is blitzkrieg. it could be. eh, the strategy is such that the calculation? well, of course, how are you? she is now from the very beginning of the war from my point of view. uh, there were some statistical miscalculations made on both sides that could be achieved. right now it's not obvious yet, because, well, naturally the documents are all hidden, not incomprehensibly different solutions. well, it’s clear that the operation was based on what is enough finish it quickly and well, the negotiations in istanbul

showed that russia was interested enough. well, the end of the conflict quickly, well, the achievement of its goal, and the western line was such that the sanctions strike began to demolish the russian economy. russia simply will not be able to continue to receive that in russia it was not possible to quickly end the military through, and the west could not quickly win economically. well, we got a situation where there is well, how to say what is a kind of analogue of the first world war? when there for some villages, battles have been going on there for months with huge losses with advances that are measured there in meters, that is, the situation, of course. that's just this kind of conflict. i don't think this or that is a nasty country, they planned that this is how it would work out. but these are often many wars. they do not develop as smoothly as it was on paper, but after all, it was possible then if this close cry did not take place, but it’s not possible to turn around like that, the situation was such that when the situation began, that’s it, to go into such a long

war and it became clear. it is clear that it will be necessary to be actively involved in it. that is , there were negotiations about the completion. that is, it could have ended in march, 22 years. actually, documents on the end of hostilities were already signed on the conditions there, as far as i remember , the compromise conditions were not entirely profitable. there, in principle, they have already agreed on almost all parameters there about limiting the army. in the non-bloc status of ukraine, that in fact russia itself, if we remember, and putin’s statement, uh, demands russia was originally, well, the recognition of the crimea and the donbass of the donbass, that is, and then already that's what is now part of russia . uh, kherson zaporozhye that is, they don't even get paid initially. if they were not there, no one even made demands. that is exactly. it is they who have become this they have become. this has already become a consequence of the refusal. well, that is , nato's course for a long war, that is, russia, respectively, in this way. well

, it shows that well, like this, well, that's how we are, but it's clear that this is being done, of course, not in the interests of ukraine simply does not decide. that is, it bears territorial demographic economic losses. well, i mean, she just turned out to be a hostage. that is, she could get out of this whole conflict. well, literally with minimal losses, because ukraine had losses in the first week there. well, and so on, they regretted the barracks. many, then presented the military. why are you pitying them there, that you don’t beat, where you are spread out, where they are, that is, you choose very accurately. what is there, god forbid, there somewhere. well, that was then when it's already the war began to intensify. clearly , this is all gone. well, how would it be possible to say that now russia is such a contra, with the support of nato, they are advancing in the zaporozhye direction, time to speak out, and russia is attacking in the svatyvakupyansky direction. that is, now in fact there are two major offensives. well, the parties decide, well, to achieve enough local success for now. that is, these

are some villages, small strongholds, that is, in some grandiose, uh, victories, now there is no ukraine, so the centennial offensive has failed, in fact. well, the west is already admitted that in spite of everything, they could not break through the defense line of russia of zaporizhzhya rus even at the cost of huge losses, but russia is still waging such a local offensive. yes, it is russia, too. something of a loss, that is, well, taking into account the fact that russia still does not use the tactics of these meat assaults, which are here they are, they say, why are we saving equipment, and throwing people forward to advance him even the west is recommended. why are you there, our expensive equipment is wasted there, or use old soviet tanks. here recruit another 3 million people, that is, why 3 million people? well, of course, this is to compensate for losses already incurred, that is, there are different estimates. they are there bread range 2020 somewhere. yes, some now reach 400,000 without return there,

that is. well, i don't think until the end of the war. we are unlikely to find out on both sides there are real losses on both sides. seriously. well, even right there, artyomovsk, that is, the dude had wagner in 7 months. battle of 25,000 dead from the ukrainian side killed 65 somewhere 67,000 people during the battle for artyomovsk that is, this is the size of the loss of the end, and when do the americans plan to end with them, and the production of ammunition? their armaments and doctrinal documents have dates there of the twenty-sixth twenty- seventh year. naturally, therefore, they go through those controlled by the ukrainian government. they block any negotiations. there is also an official ban on any peace talks. uh, accordingly, no negotiations, in fact, are not being conducted now, that is, the goals will be erased by military means, it is clear that the west will be able to continue to supply ukraine with equipment and missiles. and in principle, i think that everything that lies below the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons in ukraine can and will be used. that is

, i have no doubts about this. well, that is, they are already cluster shells. well, yes, specific at once. actually. well, these are, as it were , shells, but uh, cluster munitions. donetsk was shelled back in march, 22, when a cassette was flying over 20 people killed in the center, that is, donetsk. well, what cassettes are used da mines, eh minami will continue to fill up everything. that is, you can see, for example, laos, who have been there for decades, after that they cleared mines, people died there. that is, well, keep in mind that every year it’s more mines, this is the destruction of infrastructure, so she originally wrote that ukraine is syria at maximum speed. the whole thing is a series at maximum speed. here a series of conflicts began in the eleventh year, again with an attempted state color coup, and the war there, as it were, well, so the main war, as if the fighting subsided actions nevertheless go in the country destroyed session 75% of the infrastructure destroyed a huge number of millions of refugees. eh, that is. well, here, ukraine is essentially it. here it is delayed. here in this scenario. we started by

talking about ours. yes, here hmm , the so-called euro-maidan and the pictures of syria were those who tried to save. e system, well, in general, a priority, because you need to look to see. i create some remembered and a warning that also say that you will do the same. and so we saw how yugoslavia was destroyed, that is, through a series of wars there, through the battle with it kosovo so, in principle, siri also that’s exactly the colony on the question of who will win, and i work , in fact, every day, that is, without days off , to ensure that this victory took place in the informational humanitarian, other planes, for me it is, as it were, personal on the one hand . well, you can’t tolerate an openly nazi regime at your side, which glorifies accomplices hitlers.

i would just be ashamed in front of my grandfather that, well, everything that they crushed then, it all raised its head, when german tanks with crosses are based in ukraine, when they go there, uh, frank nazis with symbols from the es divisions, when there well, in fact , outright terror has been implemented, as if from my point of view it is absolutely and actually unacceptable, therefore, even then, in the fourteenth year, he left. crimea that is, if it were not for him, all this is not euromaidan, ukraine would now exist within the former borders and crimea and donbass would be part of ukraine, that is , it is euromaidan. actually, all this inspired, and we still have them. including russia, including reaping the consequences of the fact that then it was not possible to nip it all in the bud, and that's it. we see this now, it has an effect on belarus, that is, if there had not been euromaidan in kiev, of course, there would have been no attempted coup d'état in minsk and there never was. now it will be straight. here are such military threats, by the way, a number of

philosophers and political scientists suggest that the next attempt here will be worse so change of approach. it happened at the end of the 2000s, starting with the arab spring. we saw that almost all of his revolutions ended in very big bloodshed, somewhere less like in egypt a or b. when, well the country is literally bloody chaos. let's not immerse our separate right into it and we were invigorated. let's take a short break. we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe to ask questions. suggest guests we are in touch. on the air say it again, don't be silent. and today we have a military guest expert boris rozhin boris let's talk. about pmc grupovagner. you write quite a lot about this military structure, pay tribute to their military glory well, objectively, if we consider their battle path, then starting

syria, africa, ukraine, that is, everywhere they achieved very serious military results and, let's say, if in the zero years the main dude , well, the most important thing is that , as it were, the american dude blackwoo water is now known as academies, but now, of course, this is the second half of a dozen of the early twenties, of course, the cunning dude became number one in terms of the military effectiveness of the results achieved. that is, e now, if you take everything, that is, there is a couple of american private security companies that are competitive, here is at the level of wagner and the turkish pmc, in principle, the rest are all at a much lower level, that is, political west it is possible to overestimate from this we see the dawn of this era of hybrid wars, proxy warriors that began, and since the time of the arab spring, the dude has become, well, an integral tool of the state politicians. that is, it is a political tool.

e, when the state does not want to do something directly, but it needs to be done, respectively , there are now structures that take these issues, as they say, outsource, that is, they perform these tasks , the state reaps success if it is achieved, but a person , such a private company receives resources and the opportunity to further develop recruit people. well, well, expand your market share, that is, everyone is doing this now , regardless of the political system, where democracy is authoritarianism. as they say, because dude, if in the usa and in china and so many people willingly, in general, something happens these and well, of course. why, because e account, as a rule, salaries for the military. the rules are much higher, that is, well, let's say in the donbass in the fourteenth year, when the salaries were 18-20 thousand for fighters, that is, well, a cd in the trenches for 20,000, and you are offered to go to syria or africa for 200, of course , the choice of many went, that is,

therefore, well, let's say with taiwan there are a lot of people who fought in the donbass in the fourteenth year, when the intense hostilities ended and it became clear that there would be no serious progress. many went, uh, to fight in syria in africa, where they also achieved very serious results. that is, there would be now no such african policy of russia without a person. wagner a prigozhin's rebellion 2 months ago. you wrote as a historical event, which will certainly be included in the textbooks, taking into account the informational agenda that we now have, but you have not revised your assessment. hmm well, the event itself. well, if we introduce some estimates there are legal e, that is, this event is the price of history. rather, a column, of course, when the period will turn on, that is, we see that the first textbooks are already beginning to appear. psv where is the story, where such mini-interpretations are already appearing, books are coming out. well, as, of course, precocious, but nevertheless there. we have a story with the wagner ball

, it will also go into this story. i mean, she 'll get the balls because, uh, even if, well , political expediency prevailed in the interests of preventing civil conflict, the conflict ended exactly the way it ended, nevertheless, the political assessment of the event was given; it was a military mutiny. and actually on the facts. this, of course, was a military crumb. because when putin gave the order to stop, and prigogine said that i was not there. i will continue. this, of course, is already a refusal to obey the supreme commander in a war. that is, this is the crumb and, as it were, business is relative. as we like it, the parishioner does not like it there. well, the facts are as follows, that is, and, accordingly, in stories. of course, it will enter precisely as a rebellion, and not in any other way, that is, it is without regard to the price that any others. prigozhin's actions are there mistakes, there are achievements, the rebellion is prigogine for him personally. yes, this is a mistake. and for the country, this caused significant damage, because, firstly, the pilots died. this is a raster moment. again . this was caused by internal destabilization in the rear, which could be

used by the enemy, the enemy tried on the day of the rebellion, that is, the enemy tried to attack with all his might, counting on the fact that this will somehow affect the integrity of the front, that somewhere the army will falter, and they will take advantage of this, but they did not succeed. then, including due to the fact that then it was possible to quickly resolve this situation thanks, among other things, to lukashenka and the director of the fsb bortnikov. since the situation was developing very in the direction of very negative scenarios, when we may have had a direct confrontation in rostov, a direct confrontation of the middle teenage region precisely in a forceful manner. that is, you saw there already from the pollock there were, that is, when combat helicopters were shot down there fired at some cars on the highway. that is, it was such a teaser that something could have happened and it did not happen, including thanks. with a technical effort, alexander lukashenko, who, in contact with putin, was able to establish a communication channel with prigozhin, and then , together with the vector of collections, they provided. uh, these guarantees that the situation will simply be rounded off, but the political

assessment has remained and all the people who saw it there. well, they kind of, uh, this, of course, influenced prigozhin’s assessment, which, let’s say, houses zhar on the wave of victory in artyomovsky battle. that is where there was indeed one of the biggest wins in recent years. that is, of course, that's all. well, let's say, so the eagle destroyed a little bit this winner, which was created, firstly, the rebellion. secondly, uh, rebellion is a failure. and today, we’ll buy a lot of informal versions about death in addition to this drawing. and cool. what kind of assessment do you give points of view, of course, for communication people, you can enter speeches of some kind of accident was obvious evil washed now is being considered. an extra version, that is, as you study black boxes of analysis of the bodies of dead aircraft wreckage. eh, god, well, the investigation into groups can. well, to determine a more accurate picture of the catastrophe, among the cause, whether it is an external impact of the explosion. e explosive device on

the plane. i think all these versions, of course, will be discussed, how officially and put forward, that is, there will certainly be a lot of conspiracy theories, which are, well, british tabloids. you know they came out on the same day with the same headline that this is putin's revenge. in addition , it shows favorably what to cultivate some internal. well, internal contradictions are growing in russia, although putin, on the contrary, is unprofitable. it’s in this vein, as they say, it’s alarming to eliminate, because firstly, there are guarantees that were given on behalf of putin on behalf of president lukashenko, and now it turns out that they gave guarantees of a guarantee, no matter how well, so they yes, respectively, even with political point of view, putin, as it were, is completely useless. that is, it could be the other way around. uh the forces that well set to destruction russia's political system is. here, again, the use of this situation with prigozhin, well, they could consider that, on the one hand, they are removing a dangerous figure, on the other hand, they will help somehow cultivate some kind of internal contradictions within the military-political elite

of russia, that is. e, well, again , it's too early to talk about who exactly and how it was planned. i think they will learn this over time to find tasks that, as you beautifully call it, outsourced, pmcs are the same direction. uh, how will it be now? that's what you think about the prospects of this structure. well , also, if that is, production, there are serious changes in the leadership of such a large structure that operates on several continents. and in many countries. that is, naturally. this, well, cannot but affect the quality of the implementation of these tasks, that is, the current task is both in belarus and in the tsar. e in syria is still strangely not carried out there, that is, in the same volume, and in principle, at the political level, all countries confirm that, regardless of the fact that how the investigation will go there, that is, these countries are ready to continue cooperation as before, whether it’s important for a dude or if he made it, replacing a contractor, because

it’s clear that there are other dudes in russia, and work through the ministry of defense . that is, just recently , yevkurov's visit to libya again shows that there is no work in africa, only pmcs, but this is precisely the future of the structure in the long term. it's pretty foggy right now. that is, i think, after it becomes already there will be more details on the reasons for the death of prigogine. and it will be possible already at the request of other officials of the company to have a rough idea of ​​which course to choose. uh, dude important in the future to be yes, will it be more closely affiliated with the state? or they will continue the introduction. the same about the same. in the mode in the same format, that is, but this again depends on the top manager in the company, who, so far , are too often not happy with our statements. why am i actively interested? uh, very uh, worrying about the poles for whom the presence of pmc wagner on our territory

was such a serious horror story in the election campaign, what will happen now? what do you think, well, again, they enjoy the transfer of dude important between belarus when inflating again some kind of russian anti-belarusian threats. uh, well, using it there, including for pulling up additional forces, and on the market of suwalks there and well, and on the western borders of belarus, but it really does the bang. here, first of all , the task of training consultation of the security forces of belarus and heavy weapons, which could be used some kind of assets there. in fact, they all became on the territory of the lpr. from some there were field camps and they were transferred along the axis even before the entry of belarus, 50 of the ministry of defense were transferred from the club of ammunition to the sub-barreled artillery of tanks, uh, there, in principle, they stopped by basically. well, at best, with light weapons, this is, of course, not enough for some serious offensive actions, therefore, well, with all the propaganda pictures that are being created in poland, it is obvious that on

the level of the military headquarters. well, no one believes the general staffs that shirokovanov is going to attack poland there or lvov. that is, it’s as if there simply aren’t such resources for this, but nevertheless. once we've spoken. about poland , how do you explain this aggressive policy. representatives of warsaw, which, in general , are actively militarized and, in fact , do not hide, as intentions to create the most powerful army in europe, but they are in fact. yes , they are creating this army on credit, that is, they are gaining loans by purchasing a large number of weapons in the united states in south korea there are still a number of countries. well, among the ambitions of poland, this is definitely the annexation of the western part. this is not a big secret part of the poles - it is let out periodically. well, uh, today russia is practically publishing documents about the preparation, e, the connection of three or four regions of western ukrainian under the guise of help. well, entering the polish-lithuanian corps through integration, well, poland and ukraine in the winter, if we know these statements, that

there are no borders between ukraine and poland. well actually polish military personnel take an active part in the hostilities in ukraine , that is, according to various estimates. there, from seven to 10,000 died during the war in ukraine, that is, and then , under the guise of mercenaries for us, volunteers are nevertheless more active, that is, in order to recoup these, well, the costs of loss, that is, uh, they naturally calculate for certain territorial acquisitions during this war. that is, well, the most logical thing. this, of course, is western ukraine. well, we see that threats are also heard in for belarus, this is a realistic scenario. do you think that the scenario emphasizes the fact of the transfer of nuclear weapons, because the threat of a conventional war without the use of weapons of mass destruction on the territory of belarus is really, well, it poses a serious danger, because the army of belarus is, of course, smaller than the nato troops that are concentrated in, let's say, eastern europe which can be used, say, for aggression against belarus and and in the presence of nuclear weapons,

of course, these are direct threats to make much more difficult now. that is, again, this is necessary. it's not an attack weapon. this weapon is precisely insuring, that is, to avoid. well, let's just say to cool down especially hotheads in warsaw who think, let's now from the territory of ukraine from the territory of poland throw these militants under a white-red-white flag, which will imitate the creation of some kind of democratic there. actually, as if belarus was voicing all the time. these plans are hidden documents that they want to seize to seize some kind of regional center to raise create there is some kind of democratic government, which will be recognized there by poland, ukraine and the united states, and well, as a pretext for starting this. and somewhere else the region has troops. well, damn it, well, militants use weapons for further aggression against belarus, that is, there are such plans. you understand the fact is that your speak should cool off to cool these hot heads, but we see that even the presence of tactical nuclear weapons did not stop the poles from continuing further on their

territory. they will certainly increase that is, the plans for the deployment of nato to eastern europe, they imply a steady increase in the grouping. e in the baltic states in poland well , the czech republic is there, too, because they have a plan to deploy up to 300,000 people in eastern europe near the borders of russia. they are a plus, and the connection there will have to be a body somewhere up to fifty thousand. this is a rapid response corps, which can be quickly deployed to certain areas and is carried out quite quickly , there is such a plan. that is, we see, yes, probably, the russian belarusian group has increased in belarus, nuclear weapons have appeared now. in addition to this, the leningrad new military district is also given, that is, again, we will see the strengthening of our grouping in kaliningrad, the strengthening of our grouping on the border with the baltic states of finland . remembers the years of the cold war, when the two blocs

had huge military resources concentrated opposite each other, and along the line of division there was just an iron curtain, along essence. well, new ones, and not created by us , were formed. he now passes much to the east, again, this is the price of gorbachev's policy and well, in short, the great yeltsin who allowed all this, that is. well, we reap, including all the consequences. that 's the periodicity, well, you think that here they are simply deceived by the west. well, they believe that gorbachev initially. ah, traitor. well, i mean, well, the controversy continues. well, as a fact, here we live in a world created by these people, that is, everyone thought that we would be happy to be friends with the west everything will be europe from lisbon to vladivostok and in russia part of the political elites for a very long time in the nineteenth year you did the exhibition, and for the pressure of vladivostok, russian inertia, that you thought that we made serious concessions there, that

now we will live and not there will be no conflict in europe well, war in europe is impossible. eh, how about why? let's all be friends to trade, but then it turned out that the west does not particularly need russia in the form of some kind of partner. it seems to me that the historical explanation, after all same. if you look at the spiral, which is always on the rise, again, russia was gaining power, it does not need strong competitors. that's all. yes, yes , the scores of who came to us did not draw paper, that is, somehow a building house. yes , she understands nord stream, very seriously. well, yes, in fact, because russia worked out. she got a chance to trade. that is , it was a mutually beneficial deal for russia for germany when this war is now, that is. the americans are just solving the problem. that is, with the help of ukraine, not only weaken russia, they weaken the european union very much. we see how it collapsed, not the economy. some of their countries generally fell into recession, although even germany was primerkel one of the locomotives of europe, america and people.

well, what’s worse is better for you and people tolerate all of russia; this built their expectations that nationally oriented elites will prevail in europe, which will be focused on improving the well-being of their own population, that is, on mutual trade cultural exchange. that is, with germany the latter tried to build. that is precisely this kind of relationship, as if on an equal footing, that is, but in the end it turned out that the atlantic elite, which, well, frankly dominate its race , the union, let's say, well, clearly follows the lead of the washington move, this is the visit of the minister of defense in russia and belarus, yes or even shanfu recently he was with us and washington has it reacted threatened fingers? and he said that if only some help turns out to be immediately followed by some answers, what do you think in general about the prospects for our military-technical cooperation with china, well, it will obviously develop. that is, you see the old somehow. i think, regardless of the name, that he was under sanctions

even before he began to travel abroad actively, that is, china for him. that is, he directly, of course, does not supply any weapons, but on the other hand, china closes the army has a number of points related to the same drones that they can easily buy, that is, there are no sanctions restrictions. there on many issues. no, russia allows. well , maybe close some problematic moments with with the help of china we see in the distance the number of rays. uh, they will increase, and their number and size. and, that is , i think, the military technical production of individual e, weapons that will be used , including by russia, will also melt away, but from the point of view of belarus , then, again, the opportunity opens up for the floor. for me, well, since there are no direct sanctions there, there are no interesting weapons to buy. especially in their technological ones, which, let's say in the west , are now impossible or difficult to buy, well, which can be bought either in china or through china, and given that i now understand that the cost of the armed forces

will grow everywhere now and the requirements for manufacturability and weapons are also growing. china - this is a very important partner. and was and will remain. well , they, of course, do not chip everything. that is, one should not think that there are such china who will help everyone, save everyone. no , this is wrong, that is, but china , just in case it is somehow an important partner, as it were, naturally, in russia in belarus there is, as it were and their interests, but now since all three countries are in an acute stage of conflict , the us is less chinese, but still understand that the conflict over taiwan is a matter of time , moreover, there have recently been statements that the us is ready to hand over. ah, weapons. yes , a decision has already been made to transfer cruise missiles to manpads tanks. that is, again, they, like in ukraine, they pump up taiwan at the right time. that is, when it is the most disadvantageous china, they will try to activate this conflict. it is clear that china would like to peacefully resolve the issue with taiwan, but i think no one will give washington any gifts. and when the time comes for conflict, taiwan will activate. and now we will break for a short while after a short pause, we will return to this studio again, while

subscribe to our telegram channel. say, do not be silent, but look for all our releases on the youtube channel, belarus is one. say again, don't be silent, and our guest is military expert boris rozhin , uh, boris here. see last year , joe biden said that the united states will not leave the middle east and will not leave behind a vacuum that will be filled by china, russia or otherwise. but biden then, as if it dawned on him. uh, i'm quoting, how closely us interests are intertwined with success in the middle east today. uh, a year after those statements, what do you think? yes, with or the united states to retain leadership in the middle east well , leadership as such is no longer there. we are witnessing a steady erosion of us influence in the middle east, but it has not been going on since the beginning of the russian operation in syria, which reversed the trends that were invested there

after the arab spring, that is, the united states, despite the presence of its troops in syria in iraq, that i have countries here, they are nevertheless lost, influence. we see that in iraq they have reduced. the number of their military bases that remain are regularly attacked by iranian proxies, that is, the bases are fired upon, and the americans periodically attack the american logistics convoys. iranian proxies are being bombed there along with israel, but this does not help much, iran's influence in iraq and syria only grows, this is again the main the consequences of the arab spring for the entire region, that is, islam friginational states, breaking them up or, uh, making them, well, weakly capable. they actually cleared the ground for iran, so a strategic land corridor arose. tehran beirut which passes through the hierarchy or you, that is, the iranian received direct land access. iranian forces to the mediterranean. deployed near the border with israel, hasbulah is at the peak of its military now, if military capabilities are in

syria having placed bases everywhere, recruiting people is underway constantly. and naturally, pressure on american bases in syria is also growing in unknown places, let's say. freedom fighters periodically attack american bases, that is, the shelling of american bases is not something like that now. uh, why not, what could not even be imagined before, that is, in the zero years , to imagine that someone was shelling american bases. it's like, well, some kind of oksimiron, yes. and now it's already, in principle, everyone is used to it, but quite a hand-made phenomenon. that is, like here are some stories there with drones. because just some kind of whole american bases in the middle east are the norm. moreover, you call the attack on moscow city there some kind of almost fake toy, of course, not fakes, that is, some damage is inflicted. uh, economic, that is, well, in general, the publications were divided into repairs. ah, it’s suspended, let’s say the airports are open. this is also money. that is, these are tens of hundreds of thousands of dollars of damage, that is

, when the airport there does not work for several hours, that is, in any case, this is damage, that is, it is clear that from a military point of view average. here there are points of potential, as it were, well, for the main ones. as if about nothing, well, anyway, some. it is clear that the enemy uses this more for the purpose of the media. that is, when here i am, you cannot achieve serious military results about the offensive stalling. well, you can block these military failures with some of these drone attacks. well, that is, in principle, from the point of view of informational psychological warfare - this is, in principle, completely. understandable operation. well, it's terrible, what are you saying boris that one can get used to it. as they say, respect for a human being is an adaptive animal, he gets used to everything, but, but it ’s clear not this situation itself, and in no case can we say that this is all normal. no, this is not normal, that is, well, we kind of got into such a reality, yes, that is, to run. oh, it's arrived. drone well, of course, it doesn't make any sense anymore, but the fact that these spirals bother me in this twisting, but you can also give a nuclear action, because

there is a constant escalation. it will, of course, as i said, that is, everything that falls below the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons. can be applied. that is, the risks increase accordingly, that is, well, we have already seen the warriors, this is the korean war where everything ended, just before the threshold of the use of nuclear weapons there was a war between iran and iraq, which is slag, i changed everything, including weapons of mass destruction . that is , saddam hussein used chemical warfare agents, that is, the conflict between india and pakistan , the conflict in general between the dual-nuclear powers, which were cashed out because of it. they are there from time to time there are military clashes. that is, it’s still the same somewhere, it’s going on, but at some point, thanks to politics there , all this is somewhere up to this line that cannot be crossed, it will not be crossed. well, now the risks of this are increasing, because, well, the stakes are constantly rising. next year. this will begin with the supply of combat aircraft. there are even more long-range missiles , respectively, risks, including some kind

of provocation associated with undermining the zaporizhzhya and if everyone saw that the kakhovka hydroelectric power station can be undermine and create an ecological catastrophe there with consequences up to a decade. well, they blew it up, everyone saw that it is already something not so unthinkable, that is , uh, the option of blowing up the power supply to the zaporizhzhya npp is quite realistic, for example, a strike on a waste storage site, which, as i understand it, if the order will be given by the americans, then it is really quite real, because they do not care that europe will be polluted. well, well, yes, they heard that when they destroyed the warehouse in the militia team there were british shells, with a combined uranium, and there are these clouds. it went west to ukraine. there, in the direction of poland, that is, everything that they saw, well, it’s clear that the americans are there for britain somehow absolutely. there they grabbed it early and have not yet been used. here are shells with combined uranium. that is, they most should , up to the west, various environmental organizations

said that well, this is generally already practically the level of application that allows substances there to be weapons of mass destruction. they say no. we don't think so, we will supply them, that is, they supplied them. uh, then they allocated cluster supplies. it seems to me that this world has broken, not the city, the next old world order is already like this, that is, we saw that it fell apart from the old events during the first world war, when the second world war drastically weakened the british empire. we already saw the second world war with the usa and the ussr have already finally become the only superpowers, and the british empire, following the results of the second world war, generally collapsed as one of the largest actors. that is, such are the periods, yes, then there is now our generation has grown up, that here we lived two times the second time of the great era. change. well, as they say in chinese, it is better, of course, to live so badly, but we survived. uh, the decline of the ussr and describe now. here we see how the whole world is familiar to us. that is, it crumbles in belarus how many

years have i last? well, as i have been to russia once, i came. i came here at the age of 10. in the ninety -first year, when one of the lungs of the ussr already visited minsk. well, so i went to play chess at the spartakiad of the peoples of the ussr , just a cold mind. it's also chess refuses. yes? complete me very impressed. well, the country then was even remembered, especially the sawn-off shotgun. well, the brest fortress. she influenced, including on my worldview, how would you understand, where does it all start from, did you really see him that this is a war? this memorial there conveys this feeling very well. this is something terrible, which caused some suffering with this task. you led to their effort it took, well it took to overcome this, respectively, this. well, understanding. this is what it helps yes, your concept. why are you doing this on the information front. and how are you in

belarus now, minsk has changed, well, how would it be in a new glass building, yes, that is, it gives the impression of such a clean, pleasant, very green city. not every city. that's it . according to the green one, i already have a green one in sevastopol. well, i don't know, he's everywhere. oh, listen, neat and green. here i have such main ones, there are such emotional ones. like this. i just didn’t even have time to look, how, well, let’s go, because you must enjoy our beautiful capital. we were very glad to have you as our guest. uh, because we are subscribers and follow your blog, including how events develop , of course, of course, we believe in some kind of, uh, noble outcome of this bloody deed tatyana shcherbina victoria popova say goodbye to you today. goodbye. goodbye. and now boris rozhin says uh, times are difficult now. uh, on the one hand. interesting, that is, you can see how the world is changing, that is, how we still lived five years ago. this is the outgoing nature, we will

certainly live in a different world. that is, without this, how will the war in ukraine go? that is, it will certainly end, all wars end, that is, we will already live in a new world that will be formed , including, uh, according to the results of the military ukraine, well, and the conflict in others regions. yes, that is, the world is changing in a way, no matter how much you would like, but, unfortunately, in the course of various power conflicts. and most importantly, what i would like to, that is, evaluate what is, e, evaluate, if and in the country lives in the world. appreciate this world, because directly, well, there is no pathos. there is no elevation in war, war is, as i said, i’m in a fat, the most disgusting thing in life and you need to understand this and not play war, that is, do everything to make it as possible, if possible, to end it, but belarus i wish that it remained, uh , a stable and prosperous side and , as it were, also appreciated the achievements that have been achieved over the past decades, because the main achievement of belarus is peace.

an intellectual show in which there is a place and for humor you know how to determine the question that the participants will never answer, everything is very simple. ask anyone you can't go wrong with tricky questions and unexpected answers. what kind of alphabet is this? the eighth character of the greek alphabet remember must know the answer oak. yes, everything, i like louder, clearly.

suddenly he starts asking again. i accept the answer. each correct answer brings one of the teams closer to victory, and mistakes are fraught with the construction of a tower. i haven't got the question yet. complete to the end. and natasha already wrote something there. you ask me not so in a whisper, so that the tv viewer would not hear us. yes, i like it, watch the intellectually entertaining project tower on our tv channel sincere children's curiosity. it is interesting to you in life something was given by pull. do you believe in anyone in our modern world, does your recognition give you any privileges, absolutely honesty and genuine emotions of the characters? ah , she may be unrequited at the moment when i stop feeling love, well, then there, it will be the moment of my my end

of a talk show in which famous people answer tricky questions from children. why did you disappear before me social networks disappeared you easily with your children easily with them up to 12 years old. so, when the eldest daughter turned 12 or immediately it became very difficult. watch the project 100 questions for an adult on belarus 24 tv channel.