well, are you ready to become a fairy-tale character? you are the real princess. i will take the light away for a while. come on, i'll show you the game room for the elite today i'm sure to be lucky. all in, buddy. you seriously put your couple company, as far as i know, the company belongs to me, you and your wife. don't touch me. you saved me yesterday, you kidnapped me today, do you know exactly where he lives? how to find it? sorry old man. if i knew, i would help, i'll run away anyway, watch the series captive on belarus 24 tv channel.

this is a sphere of interest and we are now continuing with the exchange rate of the belarusian ruble weakened against all major currencies. so the current rates for the national bank dollar 3 rubles 20 kopecks. the euro costs 3.46 for 10 yuan they give 4.38 belarusian, and for 100 russian 3 rubles. and 35 kop. since september , the salaries of state employees and payments to those who are on a well-deserved rest will increase in belarus. this is the second increase in the base rates and labor pensions themselves, and incentive payments for teachers, all this became possible thanks to sustainable work. industry, yes, and the entire economy as a whole, and so budget revenues today exceed spending and a surplus of an average of 2 billion rubles. how much money from the state treasury is planned to increase the incomes of belarusians, if there are cases of wages not paid on time, how

the ministry of labor reacts to this and whether it is possible to return the earned money, we asked the relevant minister about it. irina anatolyevna hello, summer is coming to an end and some changes are waiting for us in the fall. in particular. from september 1, the base rate increases and many can expect some kind of increase in salary. still, how much will this salary increase. and how much money will it be from the state treasury directed at this today more than 800,000 people work in the country. these are just state employees, when we entered 2023 , the budget provided for more than 16 billion rubles. and, of course, a growth schedule and scenario were drawn up, and wages in the public sector from january 1 raised the base rate of 228 rubles. at 7.5% from september 1, a resolution was signed with a base rate of 235 rubles. it's just 3%. you

know the base rate is such a major element of the public sector's wages rises the base rate rises, stimulating compensatory payments, therefore. in general, we estimate that, taking into account the growth of the base rate and a number of incentive payments, wages will increase by about 15% of the public sector by the end of the year, but i want to say that in addition to the base rate, well, september 1. here is the eve of september 1, of course, there will be an increase in wages, especially for teachers, funds have been allocated for incentive payments, these are curators of study groups of higher educational institutions in the amount of the base rate of 100%, and, of course, teachers with an increased incentive payment for the peculiarity of work in the industry from 6 to 21%, and will be provided from september 1. well, since september, pensions will also grow. and in the budget, when it was still adopted at the beginning of the year

, 2.5 billion rubles were provided for these payments. these increases - within this amount, there are 2.3 million people today, those who receive a labor pension, this is already an increase in pensions, and from september 1, you know this increase, it is 5% for the state per month - this will be additional for september 72 million rubles were sent. in general, september e, the cost of paying pensions is 1.7 billion rubles. these are such significant expenses that the state incurs today in order to really ensure its obligations to pensioners. well, in general, if we talk about expenses, how much does it take to pay pensions? do you know that today it is commensurate with almost nine percent of gdp, what is it? this is the total cost of education and healthcare in our country, but there will be some growth, if it is 5% september by august, then september by september is almost

15%. i want to say that our young pensioners. yes, these are people who have recently retired, but many continue to work, and almost 418,000 continue to work. well, taking the opportunity. yes, i would like to say that we have such a very unique norm, like a deferred pension, when a pensioner continues to work, thank god that health allows and it is interesting for the employer, because he has experience of knowledge , he may not receive a pension while working, and for example after 5 years, retiring already, leaving his job pension. maybe be significantly increased. but speaking of income, of course, it is important that wages are not only earned, but also paid in a timely manner. decree number three was adopted at the time of payment, which is already shown by the practice of applying an effective measure to a person. no need to walk through the corridors of the judicial authorities. if the employer in a good way cannot decide and ensure those

fulfillment of his obligations that are entrusted to him, and has already worked for the requirements of the department of state labor inspection, if the employer does not comply. when compulsory enforcement bodies are turned on since april of the current year, 3,500 people are for those who were not paid wages, according to which the employer issued 200 claims for almost 7 million rubles. and i want to say that for this short period. eh, almost every third person. worker. he was paid wages. and that 's all for today, look at the sphere of interests. three times a week tuesday wednesday and thursday. good luck with your business. and see you.

rain dispense leaves shine, sun. i want to look at this light better. and every day to discover something new, she would have this tactic. because we cut it with love. with love to belarus this is my propaganda let's start sometimes to

see the most interesting it is necessary to consider it in the array of the rest is also interesting. today, without a prelude, on friday, i held a meeting with alexander lukashenko on the work of the main university of the country, austin bsu . i talked to journalists about questions. we asked different questions, with clarifications, both about the death of prigogine and about a. is it putin and about the future of the wagnerites in belarus, about brix and the danger for the dollar , about the imminent exercises on the cst and the hysteria of poland with lithuania, alexander grigoryevich answered in detail on all topics. so detailed it is interesting that the evening reports about this conversation on the main tv channels of the country broke through the psychological mark of half an hour of airtime . and here, against the backdrop of an interesting one, the most lost in my opinion. and why did lukashenko come to bsu at all, it’s interesting, this is because it’s not especially about bsu, but about how the president makes a difficult decision. let's go chronologically, and i'll tell you. here's how there is the presidential administration preparing the head of state before from which the conclusion suggests itself that in the country's main university, to put it mildly,

not everything is good. and something even in the sad environment of the proposed solutions is the change of the university leadership , which translates from bureaucratic into russian as let's fire the rector . demands to make this meeting about public and b will invite not only the leadership of the university, but also all the deans of all the faculties of the belarusian state university, rectors of other major universities in the country, teachers with academic degrees and just teachers, later the president will say that he was dissuaded from such a public format, but few say lukashenka, who can, if he has there is a clear plan and motive to figure it out, and now the head of state comes and outlines the essence of his visit, the government carried away the radical proposal. due to the presence of a significant number of problematic issues of activity, such as university, and the person of bsu i am not yet inclined to such a decision, the opinion of the government. naturally,

the ministry of education supports them, it seems to be discussed at first glance. there is nothing here at this moment on the left and right hand of the head of state in the presidium are the rector, whose bsu is proposed to be removed and the minister of education, who supports the government's proposal to remove the rector, the paragraph sits members of the government, who made proposals to remove the rector, as well as the head of the presidential administration, whose report and became a reason for the government to make a proposal to remove the rector , which was supported by the ministry of education, so that the discussion and the decision were not behind the scenes . alexandra grigoryevich gave the rector, as well as his team, the opportunity to defend themselves and prove that they are doing their work and everything is not so bad. as written in the reports and here the head of state outlines the essence, and then despite the fact that for the time being emphasize the display of the proposal to dismiss. he does not agree that not everything is perfect at bsu and far from on the first day, various information comes to me and about the processes taking place

recently at the university, they alarm me, especially since i remember the twenties, where you are brilliant. they showed themselves after the water speech of alexander lukashenko gave the minister of education a chance to speak, although frankly speaking the plan of this meeting. and each meeting has a plan drawn up was different, but the president managed the process. minister in manual mode. andrei from ivan, it seems, criticized bsu, but on the other hand , he emphasized the successes, the universities of which are also quite a few therefore, after his report, the head of state could not get a clear answer. he would hasten to praise or criticize to take the liberty. to assume that it is quite difficult for a minister not to support a proposal to the government to which the ministry is directly subordinate, especially if the proposal is also supported by the presidential administration. in my opinion , the minister is sincere or otherwise supports the dismissal of the rector. this is what lukashenka tried to find out, andrei ivanets did not directly attack andrei king,

although the situation clearly favored this, and the president thought about it and asked the audience for the second time. maybe someone wants to speak. the second time everyone was silent. i encourage you in such a frank conversation. e. well, i hope if you are real, then you are frankly calm. express your opinions, wishes for critical remarks , there were no questions, perhaps for another reason, when alexander lukashenko brought a devastating report on bsu, then the first decision of the president. belarusian state university had nothing to do with the logic of the head of state. i think it was. if they say that this university is bad. let's check how well everyone else and checked individual rectors soil on their laurels, delegating their managerial functions to a deputy who is engaged in journalism , performs exclusively representative functions, if there are problems with

bsu - firstly, i communicate with bsu students yes, there is a problem, except that when i studied at bsu and graduated in 2011, they were also somewhere else somewhere the same, but there were also, if there are problems in other universities of the country, i also communicate with students not from bsu and they also say that they also have problems, and the government reports to the president that the rectors of other universities in the country are also resting they delegate their managerial functions on their laurels, the deputy is engaged in journalism , they perform exclusively representative functions, since there are problems not only in bsu, but also in other universities, and there are far from questions for the rector of bsu, then, initiating the removal of the king, you need to initiate the removal of some, and even many other rectors of universities here, the logic rests on a fork, or at bsu everything is much worse than the average, or perhaps the problem is not in bsu, but , say, in the methodology for assessing problems, and now i offered to evaluate it all to a wide audience,

lukashenka, but you can try to understand the people in the hall, it’s more like a critical introductory speech by the president, then more like a critical report from the minister of education after. the critical report of the head of administration is somehow criticized a lot and an attempt to publicly defending the rector is like suicide, why are even some journalists there ? listening to the conversation up to this point, they were already sure that the issue of the removal of the rector was almost resolved, but lukashenka stubbornly wanted to figure it out and listen to other opinions. about time there was no initiative. he himself took up the frank conversation of the fragment, which the supporters of change bring to your attention. well, the definition is probably not quite accurate, it's just such a narrow circle at the top, they have adopted it. uh, call the destructive behavior of the individual, there may be many as the president. i i want to tell you directly. we must change every day every hour. we shouldn't be frozen, that's why i'm like the head of state. and

the authorities in belarus welcome any constructive changes that were proposed in a calm spirit, and not at demonstrations and not even at demonstrations, but with sticks in their hands on the street. i'll be honest about what happened. uh, the streets are also my fault. i thought and held back. eh, leaders will come to their senses. well, anything can be seen in the world go tourniquet. well, ours wanted to be there, i think, well, somehow i think, when i saw that these protesters began to rule. from abroad, you understand my reaction, and even then it was still restrained, and then, i warned you

, parents and other things, do not break what you have created over many years, this by itself is not everything that alexander grigorievich said and frankly speaking, not everything was for the press, because it was very frank, and only then the president offered to start his defense to the rector of bsu himself. you can manage the university and solve those problems that the minister spoke about or not. yes, i can say it firmly and uh, i would like to say that the belarusian state university sees its main mission in helping the enrolled students to discover their potential. but it was not even the rector of the belarusian state university who at that moment had a devastating meeting turned into a lively dialogue and finally, those who asked for the floor appeared. some rather defended others rather attacked, but in general, the president got what he came for, he studied the problem from all sides and listened to everyone who considered it necessary to speak for a long time, this dialogue took a very long time to fit a couple of hours of conversation into the frame

program, not having the opportunity, so here is the most basic it needs a huge talent. it's just an effort of the mind. ah, the consistency of the mind. this was his shortcoming. yes, i agree that there was a certain omission in working with youth. at least at the faculty of journalism, what i saw here and there is still to be done and done. how do you assess the situation, i can’t say that there are no misunderstandings, no, there are some working moments that would allow us to say that we cannot cope with these tasks . what conclusion did the president come to in my opinion. i don’t think that alexander grigorievich, after the reports of the presidential administration and the government, began to think that everything at bsu was by no means good, but he saw that not everything was unambiguous and he didn’t take the decision that seemed

obvious in the morning already, which time i say is not enough. systems therefore, well, yes , you can make claims and you need to make claims against him, there are enough problems for the leadership of universities, but we ourselves must see our shortcomings. i don't think enough. the presence of facts in order to interfere e in personnel policy, e in the university and make some decisions, radical decisions on the leadership of the university. i personally don’t think that after this meeting, the bsu rector will have a golden dome with protection. personally, from the president, the problem that the monitoring revealed will need to be addressed, but no one will solve them faster than the current leader, because any new one needs time to understand and pick up a team work out a strategy. and there is not much time for this to fire the simplest is more difficult to complete

system and my deep conviction. lukashenka organized this big public conversation not for the rector of the belarusian state university, but for all the other rectors of other universities in the country, so that they would better understand that the existing problems, and not to be solved by them, and preferably, without delay. why? i think so after answering all the questions of journalists about the prigo. csto regarding the meeting on bsu to my surprise, aleksandra grigoryevich asked me for my opinion on the decision. more precisely, not accepted. you agree. you heard that in bbgu ah work, of course, a lot everywhere. in my opinion , universities and most importantly, there should be no formalism in this work. there is a great temptation to write on pieces of paper that everything is fine, and then we will have to clear up, you hear , they wrote to clear up. i came here to make sure. they wrote it like that, therefore, well, no, not because

it didn’t exist. it was. well, it is necessary to weigh everything and draw conclusions. god forbid we start to wet our own. here the trouble will be there, everything must be carefully passed this time. the election of these opponents is politically not the only task after all. the only problem. well, naturally, if we have the basis of the economy, and here normal people and politics will be carried out normally, then there will be fewer opponents. they will always be there, but there will be less of them. i'm not afraid to even lean out into the street. this is the main thing of all you do not fit under one child. thank you. i considered this question to be my homework from the head of state, so i reviewed the entire conversation a couple of times in order to understand a little better, so that everything is higher. what has been said can consider my public report to the president on the work done alexander grigoryevich it seems to me that now i agree with yours much more confidently.