they tried to downplay russia’s role in the world and in the region, and this was already of a provocative nature. there is a question. i have no idea how to react to this situation: when china was provoked into a conflict, it means that in the pacific basin they flew there specifically, the corresponding actions were made, and such ambiguous statements were made. dai taiwan yes china could also succumb. eh, to this provocation and of course, the consequences for china would be from the point of view of trade economic relations and a number of other aspects, not the best today, the two most winning countries from this situation usa china globally. maybe in the future it is not profitable for china, for example, but the defeat of the russian federation. well, at the moment , the united states is getting the maximum economic benefit from the current situation. well, in principle, north america, look at how canada has now raised its knee fertilizers, our markets are becoming leaders. cover and mean china there are two

approaches. there is rhetoric about this whole global situation, but it is aimed at escalation. this is the rhetoric about our colleagues russian partners. this is especially noticeable, firstly, do you understand? i can understand this rhetoric, because it’s all such a living wound. after all, someone’s comrade died, someone’s work colleague died. this is all live. yes, and naturally, what was achieved, uh, by glassax, is that both sides see each other without an agreement , their faces are capable, yes, that is, uh, you cannot agree with a fanazi, fascist, fascist, or colorado, whatever the other one is called ? yes, yes, that is, you cannot agree, if you do not respect your partner, if you don't see the agreement there, the capable party, he managed to achieve this and there is uh, on both sides on both sides such an irreconcilable position, what we must do to the end, and to the end this means uh. the escalation

of the conflict and, accordingly, today we cannot clearly say what scale this escalation will be. this is a position for constant escalation. i consider it destructive; my opinion is that there is a military aspect to this, but there is an economic aspect to the conflict . there is an economic aspect. uh, the international relations aspect is all aspects. they are very close are interconnected, in general, any war is a war , first of all, a war of economics, a war of uh economic potential. in general, what is the global goal of the collective west so that i explain to you what they want, you shouldn’t have it primitive there, they took some height or moved 30 km with the road, they don’t care about the completely new washington how many kilometers this or that moves. uh, their task for the decade is to hold back the eurasia region in development, that is, today their task is to destabilize the region so much so that a decade ahead, he couldn’t with them. in subsequent competition

, why did the united states initiate this war in the first place, so that you understand that the americans need to service their foreign debt? america will never pay off its debt obligations. everyone knows this, the whole world knows that the united states will never fully pay off its debt obligations, but it will be serviced annually. external debt is necessary for this we need a market, a new market. the best option was for the americans to destabilize the european region. they've already destabilized it the european union has tied up north american energy resources, and they are withdrawing some of their production from this region, and accordingly, they are counting on the fact that if there is a conflict here , the conflict will be hidden. create a new market for recovery in the next region. and this, again, is a new american company today that is engaged in the production of weapons and other things , have super-profits, and europe mainly purchases from the usa, so you understand, uh, if

we take it globally, then their task is in no way case them. uh, from a point of view. i say again, the movements of some moving borders cannot be strategically weakened, because the next confrontation will be with the use of space technologies, and they want this region to be two generations behind them, the one who will control the near-earth space , in principle, will dominate both the economy and the military sphere. and in principle, as scientists believe, i am not the country that will control the near-earth space in space. in 5-10 years it will be able level, and in general the nuclear arsenal of any country. and now we will take a break. we remind you that we have telegram channels. let's say, be quiet. subscribe, ask questions and suggest guests we are in touch. 24 hours a day, 7 days a week we are working to keep you up to date with current events

in the country and the world. in addition, our team of journalists obtains valuable knowledge from experts. how to maintain and increase health, every friday. we bring to your attention the best projects and films of our tv channel. this and much more. waiting for you in the weekly project broadcast 24/7 on tv channel belarus 24. with the history of the defense doyledstvo, we can badge from orthodox architecture and near this period, jasu round velvets are characteristic of their sailing on the formation of economical centers of ukraine and live everything, inflated people. some places the glasses of the ikean cities were significant

modeburg. eh, the lunge ring race is almost far away. walked their meaning. this was the assembled revolution of the chagunka. changed the new cultural swedish project, the architecture of belarus this is not a church started everything in the soviet period or the great polostok. eh, the temple lost its design by the fiftieth year of some late stalinist classicism, and for belarusians to recognize that it was not possible for them to come to our capital before, forgive me. it’s better than usyo and, as it were, with your soul , what is it on our tv channel ? tell me again, don’t be silent. our guest today is a businessman, political scientist and lawyer. vadim borovik.

vadim, you know, it’s been interesting to watch the relationship between poland and ukraine lately, uh, ukraine intends to file a lawsuit against poland, the entire european union to the world trade organization, if they do not lift restrictions on the export of agricultural products after september 15, such a statement was made by the trade representative of ukraine, this is a buildup. poland will begin to extradite ukrainians of military age, according to the newspaper and the polish-lithuanian commonwealth, there are now about 80,000 men of military age who left ukraine and the most interesting thing is that they will be returned by re. polish court i just want to say, but they were so friends, so they were friends. the whole court was jealous of the friendship. end came the relationship between states - this is not always the case, and flower territories for a specific bouquet period there are always nuances, but here it was obvious. ukraine should have understood when it made such an ostentatious policy towards the russian federation, it must be taken into account with someone, for example, when you communicate,

yes, that this is still a large regional player, at least with the claim and opportunity to play a serious role in the world. and it was necessary to behave delicately when they were drawn into this conflict and behaved with belarus absolutely does not need our outstretched hand. eh, they didn’t regret spitting in our direction. what did they expect from us? now, tell me, these closed skies, these sanctions and the statements of politicians are teachings in ours. that is, in reality it was not. and they were already in a hurry. that is, they treated one country in one place, yes, but they did it well. and you thought that when you find yourself in this situation, under this skating rink, and you will get involved in a conflict with the largest in military terms, how would our figures be in terms of propaganda. i mean on in the west they did not try to belittle the military potential of the russian federation - this is a powerful country in military terms, very powerful.

did you expect that your partners and also poland would not take advantage of your weakness and that they would pat you on the head, and you would, as they say, maybe in some context, provide assistance where it is not critical. for them. remember, it’s not critical for them, but uh, for every step of goodwill and help from you, then they will require counter steps in the right economic sense, in political terms, somewhere to remain silent on some events historical ones should give way somewhere in matters. eh, that means trade economic relations and so on, naturally. uh, ukraine initially, on such an impulse, uh, that means, uh , ultra-patriotic uh, it received support and so on, but then countries began to indicate their interests. this is normal, because you see, in poland, polish politicians report to their voters ; correctly, a voter can ask a question. well , listen, at some point we have utilities there somewhere. they grew up somewhere here,

maybe not like this, but such rapid growth economy, as we would like, but somewhere migrants do not suit us in such numbers and in those jobs where we could work, and more and more, uh, they are beginning to indicate their interests to ukraine. we get the answer. yes. you see, for agricultural products too. yes, why do they say, you should, we farmers feed ukraine, we already help. you shouldn’t think that the fact that you feel like a victim today and believe that the whole world owes you, that the whole world will think exactly the same as you, is a problem. in general the main actress that they did not put each other on the sides in place of each other on the sides. that’s why today they can’t agree, not hear each other, therefore, well, regarding the fact that they will hand over military personnel, or rather those liable for military service, but this is at the request of ukraine yes this suggests that not all is well with the personnel when now they show footage of people being taken directly from the beach, and uh, the medical commission

has changed its requirements. yes, there are requirements and a whole range of diseases that even in wartime are not were considered, perhaps, the call was already, perhaps, mental illness began to listen. yes, as someone there said to ukrainian politics, so that if we don’t regret healthy people, what are we going to, well , zelensky’s male logic, in your country there’s such a problem with these kids, yes, all kinds of women, why doesn’t he feel sorry, and here absolutely alexander’s bitter words support me, somehow i heard them. volodya has already said correctly that there is war on your territory. there is war on your territory. think about it, and i’m telling you about negotiations. about the beginning of the dialogue and absolutely alexander grigorievich’s position is correct , here i support him 100%, without preconditions. start the process and don’t stop this process, maybe everything won’t work out right away, but lawyers say that

when people who are getting divorced, the most valuable thing for you will be to constantly file lawsuits against each other, constantly try to drown each other. you will still have to pay for it all, but it doesn’t matter that you agree somehow. yes, so, here we are now, if we are talking about ukraine and the russian federation so sooner or later you will have to sit down at the table to negotiate the issue. to what extent will this colossal damage to demographics be caused? how many human judges will be destroyed and destroyed and what damage to the economy and infrastructure, but why doesn’t the first and main reason sit down, uh, i think, it’s still not independence, ukraine, in my opinion, is essentially 90% dependent on the will of washington before the government acts . there may be 10% of some kind of personal will, there are also positions, but listen. i think i would continue ukraine started negotiations that were started in minsk and then in turkey, and maybe

it would have started to implement something if they hadn’t been pointed at like this, uh, in the shoulder blade, and forced ukraine and she said to continue this, she very much told you that there is a global goal to maintain the dominance of the dollar, as reserve currencies to maintain control of the international financial system and destabilize the eurasian region of ukraine as an instrument. and they don’t want to stop it , they’ll have to do it differently, which means devaluing dollar abandon the squad's commitments to withdraw from certain markets. they want to delay this process, you know, they are delaying this process. they want to find time to develop the latest technologies that will allow them to compete in the future and maintain further advantages, so they view us as a market to support their own economy in order for the market to work efficiently and they need complete destabilization here. that's all. therefore, you need to understand that this is not what ordinary people should do. it’s so primitive to understand that russia is there

attacked someone, there are territorial claims. here, i talked about this and again i don’t see simple solutions , here the experts are absolutely right when they say that it’s very easy to take this and formulate it to find a simple solution, but here we need to find some kind of approach to the beneficiary of the conglosax, which from this win in order to force them to abandon this project. if we follow their scenario and increase this escalation, mutual non-reconciliation, instill mutual hatred , make not smart statements, but in a union state uh, such uh, directed. when i hear a squad of politicians, a squad of politicians, very loud, well, politicians. uh, thank god this is not the first or how many say thank god and you can write off that this is the private opinion of some deputy there, but a party functionary and so on, thank god uh, vladimir vladimirovich

putin is very wise and let's say so , reserved in any statements. well, this suggests that we are still in an alliance. we behave sanely in general, but there are people like that. well i'll call these are not even politicians, but politicians or some kind of social activists who begin, then whatever you say to the countries of central asia, or to some kind of exercises addressed to armenia right now. we will almost declare armenia a territory, separatist and occupied by armenia, then a statement by one says, well, state duma deputy, what’s potentially? we will carry out military operations with everyone in the future with everyone from belarus not yet, but also, perhaps you are a state duma deputy, a union state. we want to build uh, a strong economic economy. we have the csto union out loud. it is forbidden. it is to say such thoughts. even such promises are potentially possible. so i want us to

move away from this rhetoric, which is aimed at escalation, which is aimed at undermining mutual trust. you understand, uh, these are services. uh, the western ones, they are very skillful. this is taken out of context and spread from current telegram channels. and among young people, guys who may not have yet fully formed their attitude towards the russian federation among the younger generation. some radical groups have the right to exist in any country. there are more such nationalist movements will be hatred with their own hands. yes, that is, we do it with our own hands. uh, centrifugal forces. that is, i just want to appeal to common sense, but this is very much a million-dollar task. i really liked your ideas of finding the key to the beneficiary. this is the coolest dacha available today. i think it's worth it from day one. i 'm talking about this, yes, you see, you understand one thing if you but i have three people

the goal is for them to choose each other's hair. yes, and i’m the only one adding fuel to the fire, and the second, for any signs of physiological shortcomings or advantages , one is more beautiful, the other is worse, and you’re picking off a friend like that. excuse me, if you, according to my scenario, listen to these instigations for everyone, that you are incapable of negotiation, that you will never agree on what i wish for good, but it is worth it. uh, here's the operator, and he says, girls. yes , listen, stop, stop, that means, yes, she’s not like that, as they say. uh bad, maybe something. eh, not completely, she's already lost, maybe hear each other. understand that first you need to understand that standing in each other's shoes may be something. or maybe even be ready to make concessions on something. so today, such people who talk about this are accused of almost colossanism, they are almost cia agents, traitors to the motherland. i consider the people who make this to be enemies of the union state. common sense, but

you understand what i was talking about, the worst people in this are fools, that is, uh, traitors, you can they will respond according to the law to re-recruit. you're a fool, you can't do anything with them, do you understand or not? this is the worst thing, so you understand the complex situation absolutely correctly. for our part, we demonstrate. we are talking about negotiability, let's press it in the exercise. look, there's nothing wrong with the framework. dcb doesn't happen. yes, we, i think, and wagner would show the pole since they are so worried, that is, they asked correctly, but they, not being fully present, refuse on their own. that's it. well, yes. we see we can’t constantly knock on a closed door. or if the armada is already coming towards us? yes, maybe we are forced to respond to them. putin meets with erdogan, he says, russia is ready for negotiations, lukashenko delivers a message, he says it is necessary, nevertheless, look for a way to negotiate. the first persons of the union state. they say that they are ready for negotiations without preconditions, that sooner or later they will be called upon, but this

side does not respond to such statements enough. we draw a conclusion with you. well, yes, but not enough, because for now you feel impunity washington fully benefits from this process and feels complete impunity. why the fright? i even read with naive politicians - this is when trump was elected and there was some champagne in the state duma, then i also said that you drink champagne zhirinovsky , that you drink champagne, you would be trump an entrepreneur. this is a very pragmatic person, and his rhetoric will be even tougher. look at this one. here we are with the chinese. yes, he needs benefit, so this is a very naive position. uh is that i think uh, even a change political leadership 100%, uh, one hundred percent guarantees, for example, the cessation of financing of this conflict. if, uh, this is beneficial in strategic terms, if the stability of the dollar and its role as a reserve currency for the next decade depends on it, then they will continue this, then there is another

question. well, the power of persuasion plus a threat to some of their national interests in different ways. i'm not saying, brothers. there may even be a weapon, but look for it, again i say that it’s different. vladimir vladimirovich putin aleksandrovich lukashenko well, much more knowledgeable people and probably they can even work out some uh, ways of thinking through mechanisms, probably, it’s not all that simple. yes, probably, uh, well, relatively speaking, maybe we don’t have the opportunity to understand in some ways, but you can all of them you speak financially, if you are talking about financial opportunities, if you ask, compare the financial opportunity. if, for example, we take the budget for the dkb, this is dozens of times, if we take the economic potential of nato and from the dkb, this is hundreds of times, but objectively there are possibilities, and those allies who, even within such organizations as brix shows and others, are brix indians. in china, they have their own nuances in relations with our dkb.