the prime minister of belarus in ostan at the plenary session of the international industrial exhibition in kazakhstan. this will allow us not only to load our production capacities, carry out their modernization and technical re-equipment, but, most importantly, to create jobs and develop our own competencies that are really in demand by the industrial sector. we expect that this work will be facilitated by the subsidization mechanism approved by the supreme eurasian economic council from the ias budget. projects in the field of cooperation, belarus inoprom is represented by 32 enterprises, including large industrial giants, an enterprise of the bellikprom concern, and organizations of the national academy of sciences. the total exhibition area is almost 12,000 m. the national exposition of belarus is more than 700 km. as a result of the exhibition, it is planned to sign more than a dozen contracts worth about $40 million. minsk has acceded to the amendment to the convention on physical protection. nuclear material.

permanent representative of belarus to international organizations in vienna, andrei dayunas officially presented the corresponding instrument of ratification to director general magat. thus, our country became the 133rd party to this international treaty. rafael grossi welcomed this step by the belarusian side, especially noting the openness of belarus, the country's widespread use of iaea expert support tools, the invitation of its assessment and advisory missions and the readiness to publish their results. trends. the development of cooperation in the media sphere is being discussed these days at the international forum in ashgabat, the management of the belarus 24 tv channel, among the participants, a large journalistic meeting first of all provides an opportunity to look at the work of foreign colleagues, including in terms of technical equipment. belarus 24 is considering the possibility of expanding the broadcasting territory to increase the viewership planned by signing agreements. representatives of different media, different countries gather in one place, and through them

the tv channel belarus 24 can reach the territory of these countries , among others. asia-pacific broadcasting union, the largest in the region a platform that unites different countries, different directions, different topics, sports, culture, science, and news, well, that is, through them we can, like, by the way, an associated member of this platform, abu, also be present in this region when they gather representatives of the media, they still talk about their problems. for example, i would like to speak now, we have already talked about this, i wanted to speak about the role of the media as a tool of media diplomacy, so i will say that of all the embassies i am only in the iranian embassy was seen by the media diplomacy department, i want today’s journalism, world journalism in general , to change towards positive information , this positive agenda needs to be broadcast to the world, head of state alexander lukashenko signed a decree by which

he approved a draft intergovernmental agreement as a basis for negotiations of the republic of belarus and the dominican republic on the mutual abolition of visas, in accordance with the decree, the ministry of foreign affairs of belarus is authorized to conducting negotiations on the draft agreement and signing it when an agreement is reached within the approved project. everything to live by. watch modern belarus today on the belarus 24 tv channel. this is news from foreign countries, broadcasts of particularly important events , live broadcasts from the scene, current interviews with famous belarusians, around the country,

feature films for all ages, in the countries: azerbaijan, kazakhstan, turkmenistan, uzbekistan, kyrgyzstan, tajikistan, georgia, turkey, iran, iraq, kuwait, bahrain, qatar, united arab emirates, saudi arabia, syria, jordan, lebanon. set up a satellite dish satellite aitherspace 1. the tv channel signal is broadcast in the clear and is available 24 hours a day every day. be with the belarus 24 tv channel and discover belarus.

hello, we welcome everyone who is with us now, we are glad to have guests who are in our studio today, but let’s start. nagorno-karabakh, the situation around it, we see the aggravation that has happened now, the difficult situation, taking into account the fact that both states are not strangers to us, we, of course, perfectly understand that we need to make balanced assessments here and try to be as objective as possible, although when you look at the facts, you understand that you understand that this could not have happened without external influence, which is very many are rubbing their hands at this moment, it is very difficult to maintain objectivity, nevertheless, we will try , nikolai evenievich, in your opinion, this is the current aggravation, what is it about, why is it leading to what, first of all, it is about what , no matter how funny it may sound, the stage of reconstruction of the world has entered a hot phase, we

talked about this about a month ago , that in the near future, literally, probably at that time, we said in the coming months there will be escalations... of conflicts in various points and as an option , nagorno-karabakh, moldova, and a number of other points were mentioned, this is the reality of our forecasts at the moment, which means, as far as the situation is concerned, such conflicts have been playing for a long time and have deep historical roots, as you rightly said, requires a balanced approach. in this situation, the governments of both armenia and azerbaijan are solving their problems. by the way, the liberation of nagorno-karabakh, one of the strategic tasks spelled out in all documents of azerbaijan, namely liberation , they consider it from this side , as for armenia, it wanted to sit on two chairs today, unfortunately, today it does not happen like that, remember the phrase

a little - a little pregnant, that’s exactly how it turns out, on the one hand, on one platform it is stated that we are ready to admit, independence of karabakh within azerbaijan. on the other hand, by all means, escalation occurs, escalation under the influence of external facts, in the general picture of the world, this is another point of instability, which is used to resolve the contradiction between the leading states of the world. well, here’s the tension , indeed it can be traced even in yesterday’s news stream, literally a couple of headlines for those who are trying to restore the picture, first the ministry of defense of azerbaijan announced the beginning of esthetic measures in karabakh, then pashinyan made an accusation, saying that azerbaijan is trying to drag armenia into full-scale military action, then we saw that pashinyan had negotiations with macron, with blinken, france demanded an emergency meeting of the un security council, the kremlin calls on

yerevan and baku, yesterday we heard about this following the previously signed trilateral documents, well then we saw what was happening on the streets of armenia, pashinyan’s resignation, and we have been watching all day today how, in general, the tension is not is subsiding, alexey viktorovich, how do you look at all this, well, here you need to understand, firstly, that, of course, inciting this conflict is one of the chains of confrontation between the west and russia, that is, the task is to escalate all... conflicts along the russian border, it has existed for a long time and the karabakh conflict is very convenient here, and we see that this current escalation occurred after armenia, led by such an openly pro-western president, decided to begin

gradually distancing itself from participation in csto, from interaction with russia, as if showing that today it has no confidence in the russian side as a peacemaker and guarantor of this at least some fragile peace and a whole series of such ambiguous steps taken by the armenian head of state that led to the fact that there were, in fact, maneuvers with the americans , which led to such an active diplomatic skirmish, to the emergence of absolutely anti-russian... places of some persons there as heads of state, all this led to something, then there is a feeling that armenia is leaving this pro-russian camp , leaving the russian guarantees , it is clear that the situation around

nagorno-karabakh itself is very difficult, its status, that is, the armenian side is there, we respect it very much, and that too our friends and allies in odb, pos, in the cis, but in this case, the armenian side showed what my colleague correctly said, an attempt to sit on two chairs, and maybe even more. in this case, the very first step, which could show the priorities of the armenia, this would be their clear position in relation to nagorno-karabakh or artsakh, as they call it, and this position was expressed by pashiyan and he was subjected to significant condemnation in his society, that nagorno-karabakh, also known as artsakh, is an integral part of azerbaijan, that is, it was essentially just the surrender of all those many years of struggle that... ethnic territories that are legally

azerbaijani, the conflict is very complex, we don’t want to get up now, this is the business of the armenian and azerbaijani people, we don’t want take sides. objectively we can say that guys, let’s sort it out among yourselves, that is, that for you the same nagorno-karabakh region is the same, because when there are now attempts to say that the csto does not work, russia does not work, how can it work , if you yourself do not consider it possible to defend the territories, if nikola pashinyan says that there are no armenian forces at all in nagorno-karabakh, that is, then the question arises if azerbaijan is conducting an anti-terrorist operation on its territory, and there are not even presence of armenian citizens, what questions could there then be for azerbaijan if there is a presence of armenian citizens there. there is a threat to them, you are going to take them under protection, but then you will indicate this in the public

space, it is very difficult, of course, this responds to us with pain, because armenia is our ally, we cooperate quite well, we have increased trade and economic relations in recent years interaction with armenia within the eu is very serious, so we support cultural initiatives, we very much respect the armenian people and support integrity of armenia, but we also have good friendships. relations with azerbaijan, this is also our political friend, this is also a country with which we have very close ties, in this case we are in this, their little relationship, to which we are not directly attached, we cannot enter as an active party, but we can offer, and this was stated, because our president, and the russian side emphasizes, there is no military solution, here you can only negotiate, because of course, no one wants any ethnic hesitation

here, they understand that we must contribute, so that such a situation does not arise under any circumstances, well, really , if you look, if there is even such a human question, but unfortunately, that ukraine did not become a lesson in the fact that every step you take, especially in the current world, you need to be prudent in order to avoid. where diplomacy can and should work , isn’t this what we are seeing now in nagorno-karabakh, unfortunately, yes, indeed, in many countries, the modern ruling elites, they do not learn lessons from history or from those events, which are happening in the world, yes, that means the era turns out to be plunging the destinies of entire nations, which means into the furnace of other people’s interests, naturally, this leads to collapse and statehood and other terrible things that we see today in ukraine, unfortunately at other points of tension, here , similarly, nikolai evgenievich also absolutely correctly noted that in fact it is in the interests

of the united states of america and with them the maximum possible is the presence of such conflicts along the perimeter of the russian federation in order to weaken it in fact and here it is sad the only thing is that people, the peoples of entire states, are becoming hostages of this whole situation, who are clashing with each other, waging these wars not in their own interests, to ensure someone else’s interests, this is sad, absolutely, well, then let’s move on to the next topics : moreover, one way or another, what is happening now around nagorno-karabakh intersects with what is happening now, let’s call it that, in ukraine, although this front is much wider than the geographical outlines of what is still modern ukraine. the world's attention these days is focused on the high-level week of the un general assembly has opened in new york. more and more often the organization is no longer the same, but there is no other way to bring together such different concepts of the world order in one place. but there is a topic that seems to concern everyone. isn't it time to wind down on the ukrainian front? the guardian calls the ukrainian president's presence

at the un summit the biggest geopolitical drama of the week. but the director of the international crisis group think tank prion, richard gowen, described zelsky's decision to participate in the event as a gamble. if zelsky will go to the general assembly and the security council and will insist that ukraine must continue to fight and that now is not the time for diplomacy. in recent years, literally since 2021, the russian federation has been a bogeyman everywhere and almost no one supports its position but opposes the counterbalance, these are the first sensible, so to speak, thoughts that appeared on the western side, not allies, but on

the western side from the point of view of how it can the crisis of this situation is developing, finally, healthy notes have appeared, it’s time sit down at the negotiating table, and he, i’ll just add, when he said this phrase, this comrade govan, he said that i rely on the opinions of the majority in africa, in asia in latin america, there was a parallel statement right there president turkish erdogan, who said: “we continue our efforts with the conviction that war has no winners and peace has no losers, and i would continue erdogan’s thought with the words that our president said, it’s time...” to the negotiating table, only the world can decide some provisions on ukraine. and this thesis, which, by the way, you and i, belarus, have been constantly sending in all directions for, well, i don’t know, the last year and a half, it is finally beginning to have a response, it’s not for us, not because we heard, no,

the objective situation is simply such that in ukraine. there are two options for the development of events: first, russia fulfills all its obligations, these are horrors, fulfills the goals that it has planned, and this is not that this is a geopolitical blow to the west for everyone countries that are now opposed to it, the second option, it loses only part of the territory and remains in an incomprehensible status, and this is an area, a gray zone and incomprehensibility of what is happening in the near future. and the current president of ukraine, who arrived at this summit again, as always, in paramilitary uniform and brought his wife , who is dressed in military style, for what it is not clear, because politicians don’t take the main ones, he likes the actor, his own to the end, that is he plays his role to the end, but they are already telling him, enough is enough, the script is changing, here they are

directions that should be in the future, in the future we will still have to negotiate , yuri valerievich, nikolai evgenievich tutverzha, of course, the visit is connected, it is more like such a hysterical voyage, connected with the results of the counter-offensive, the so -called, despite the fact that in the ukrainian information field, space says sensational successes, in fact this is not so, more than 70 thousand ukrainian military personnel died, a huge amount of equipment, including during this counter-offensive for the first time in world history burned, for example, british equipment, their famous challenger tank, what will be remembered for the counterattack, yes, what will be remembered, that is, a complete failure, russia is grinding, the armed forces of ukraine, because in military science there is a certain percentage, after which, when the grinding

reaches , when colleagues won’t allow us to collect a certain percentage, it will begin to collapse in geometric progression, this is the motivation of the armed forces - the fighters of these armed formations and, uh, everything connected with this, so russia is almost achieved, achieved these results, maybe one, two, three more months, probably , it’s difficult to make forecasts, but in any case , the strategic result is clear, so zelsky as an actor and, as always, he plays... as they say, yes, he puts everything , and he goes with his presence, including in such a military shell, he wants to be supported and put further pressure on the russian federation, but this is no longer possible, because in the west there are think tanks they see the results, and it seems to me that the recent

blinkin's visit to kiev is connected with this and then subsequent... visit of the german foreign minister, out of the blue , like there to check something, say hello, compare watches, it seems to me that their visits are connected with the fact that they are starting to force him into negotiations, because right colleagues said, a clear defeat of the west, it is unacceptable from the point of view of the western elites, it will be a geopolitical catastrophe for them, so we urgently need to drag the situation into the path of peace negotiations, here is alexey viktorovich, we are seeing that there, well, first of all, we need to say, what our delegation is working on these days, on the sidelines of the un genasami, headed by the minister of foreign affairs, there are many , in addition to the speech, there are many bilateral meetings, but when you observe all this and this sudden frankness of the un, adherence to principles, when they have already plucked up

the courage and ask, try to set the direction for zelsky , is this happening because the crisis of the organization’s influence, on the one hand, on the other hand , the growth of the influence of such unions as the sco, like brix, for us, for example, today the un is still the organization that we rely on must be adjusted as much as possible, or for us the main vector is those large unions in which we are either already a member, or on the way to joining, which means, look, regarding the organization of the united nations of ukraine, the ukrainian crisis itself is a hot phase , which he has now entered, in fact, a war in which more and more participants are involved in one way or another, this is not only now a conflict, directly between russia and ukraine and not only the usa and western europe supporting ukraine there, we see

attracting more players, turkey, iran, which seems to be helping russia a little, now kimchen’s recent visit to russia , where there was also a conversation about possible military-technical cooperation, one way or another everyone’s reaction to the ukrainian events, there is a demonstration of the great powers of the developing world , for example, india, yes, frankly, at the recent g-20 summit, such an open anti-ukrainian speech, the inability to give the floor to zelsky at the w20, not inviting him there, that’s what all this means, the conflict was not stopped by that organization, which was created in order to prevent these conflicts , after the end of the cold war, it not only relaxed, but the un is actually an instrument of exactly one side, today, as colleagues correctly said, in conditions when

this western part is beginning to lose militarily, those who have been playing this conflict in ukraine for a long time, it cannot be in the active phase of military operations, we see that now ukraine is already moving from military operations directly at the front to actively moving to terror. a terrorist state that bombs russian territories with its drones, tries to carry out attacks, organizes outright terrorist attacks, including attempts on our territory, as we have seen, yes, it hires mercenaries and tries to act, what is this, a method of terror, what is it talking about, you can’t solve the question, so to speak, in a fair fight, you don’t have enough universes, so you start doing shit from under the gun, you start striking not at the infrastructure, but at civilians, sowing chaos, panic, trying to create something unhealthy state

minds, in public thought, this can all spread further, it’s not just russia-belarus, it will go further and further when the same terrorist actions begin in the world, the task of the un was to prevent all this, they had to start the negotiation process, they should have, perhaps by force, brought it to the negotiating table, this was started by belarus, yeah. belarus began to invite ukrainian and russian negotiators to its territory in the very first days of a special military operation for such an organization here's the question: do we need it? of course, no one is now saying that we should lock the un tomorrow, lock it up, hang up the lock, everyone has gone to the front, no, this organization has been created, there are international standards, documents that regulate activities, but we see that objectively it needs reform, just at this session, “we can talk about what , what you rightly said, today the un

should probably have a different structure, today the un should take into account the interests of not individual players, not individual states, so we say, the general assembly makes a decision by a majority vote, where all un member countries participate, well , of course, excuse me, but if the voice of india is equal to the voice of some tuvalu going under water, which has already been all digitized and they say: well, ours the country will disappear altogether as a territory, but we will remain in the digital world , but this is not entirely correct, where there are 15 billion people, where there is a huge developing economy and the voice of an island state that will soon disappear altogether, the question is right, perhaps now the un should refocus on the interaction of these blocks and structures, right? there is nato, there is the european union, there is this conditional pro-western bloc, there is the sco, there is the g20 , there is the g7.2, there are other organizations there in south

america and in asia in africa, the african union and so on, this should be the new one let's move on, vyacheslav viktorich, we touched on the topic of zelsky at the meeting, but we understand, and the media have already reported that there is a meeting with biden ahead, what do you think zelsky and the elder will be about, well, i think he will definitely receive further instructions , it’s quite obvious that the ukrainian president ... we just discussed today that the west is interested in going to certain negotiations, but what is the danger here, what i would like to draw attention to, there really is no alternative to peace negotiations on ukraine, yes, but at the same time, the goal of denazification and demilitarization of ukraine must be achieved, otherwise

5, 10 years will simply pass and this conflict of dreams the economist, now we will simply continue, the economist, leads his readers to this conclusion , ukraine must win, otherwise they will have to look for those to blame, and there is also another option , something that has also already been voiced today, the western elites who actively support ukraine, if it does not get defeated in ukraine, of course this is it. a blow to them, yes, that means they will have to explain where these multi-billion-dollar expenses went, the money invested, yes, that means maintaining the combat capability of ukraine, why it ended in a fiasco, so naturally, and these things also play a role here, i think that there will of course be a certain message, which means implementation peace negotiations, well, of course, it means that the west will strive to defend its own, to maintain its influence on this ukrainian territory, so as not to completely lose its authority in

the eyes. own population, that means in the international arena, but on the other hand , i emphasize once again, there must be a clear position, clearly, on this the day of de-denestification and demilitarization of ukraine cannot be conceded. at a meeting in sochi between the two presidents of belarus and russia, journalists asked about their attitude towards peaceful prospects with ukraine, after blinkin’s recent visit to kiev, this topic has noticeably intensified, let me remind you that the us secretary of state then declared kiev’s readiness and that moscow should take the initiative, saying

that the absurd situation on the part of the ukrainian ukrainian establishment here is generally difficult , that it is literally said to say so , the question is explained yes ukraine today ukrainian leadership and his entourage , what do they come from when they take their steps, so zelsky went to the un now, this is what he said literally this night, he said such a thing that everyone was horrified, in fact, sensible people put their heads together and said: “lord, thank you for once removing nuclear weapons from ukraine, because while blaming russia, he actually stated that if ukraine now had this weapon, it would have already used it, that is, it would have been ready to unleash a nuclear

third world war, based on whose interests it is unclear, not the interests of the ukrainians, because most of the money that comes in goes to today a day for the development of the army, for military affairs, what they manage to save them from theft, yes, from being transferred to offshore companies, from being hidden in their own pockets, this does not go towards social needs, not for ukrainians, it goes towards this conflict, which in the end this money is just for that, look, for this is the peace formula from nato, and i quote, stosiya must surrender. if president vladimir putin russia lays down arms , peace will come, he says, russia says that yes, we also definitely have the same desire for you to surrender, but we are ready to negotiate, that is, from the outside both russia and belarus, there are not just calls, but we have seen concrete actions, that these parties are ready to sit down, sacrifice part of their interests, but achieve something for themselves, this is what vyacheslav viktorovich is talking about.