tv [untitled] BELARUSTV October 4, 2023 5:20pm-5:45pm MSK
5:20 pm
meats of belarus with shmatvekavoy history. we can obtain abaronial doilitstva from the right-wing architecture. and all for this period of time round velvets are characteristic. they floated to the pharmaceutical economic centers of the country and a zillion extraordinary people. some myastechki, garads, which were previously significant in magdybur, lost their significance in the attacks of the kali gypsum grass. geta was a true value. chchygunka changed navakolle, cultural-asvetnitskiy project of architecture of belarus. gety kastsel does not end ў savetskiy peryyad, kali vyalikaya kolkasts of the temple stratsila its percapchatkovaya meaning. everyone remembers the 50s and has such an appreciation of stalinist classicism. tell the belarusians that you won’t get a chance, because dastatkova will come to our capital, prices on the right side, if you please, as if with a soul, that... what is this? look on our
5:21 pm
tv channel: more and more foreigners are coming to minsk, why does it attract them so much? i remember these scales, these roads, these beautiful stalin buildings that were built, architectural monuments that are located in minsk, and after i arrived, there are large squares and the architecture of the city impressed me very much, and i really liked it, and they realize their potential and besides the fact that i study in medicine, i go in for sports, i have another hobby, this is school spanish language culture. in addition to the fact that i study at the faculty of international relations, i am also the chairman, and this organization is called the community council, this is an organization for foreign students of the belarusian state university, each of them has their own view of belarus.
5:22 pm
5:23 pm
the fall is known i, naslavashchyne azers, characins for the fabrics, smiling at the sun, you will look for yourself, and never from the sea, the bottom, which is in golden sand , from here on out, on the brass of the azers, like not every year, no matter how much it hurts, no matter what you want sustrazza, why not stars, mountains, pestilence, but azzera has never forgotten them. love the heart, petrus brouka. my name is igor, this is my propaganda. the week
5:24 pm
for me personally was marked by one obvious statement by alexander grigorievich about politics about the parliamentary election campaign , the obviousness of which, however, for some reason is not clear to everyone. by appointing the chairmen of the district executive committees, that is, local authorities, the president directly said that yes, the state and the force headed by the current head of state will help its people in the elections. we absolutely do not hide what we are someone. we will support, it’s natural, if we now , you know, imagined ourselves to be so chaste, untouched, they would simply laugh at us, we have our own tasks, we have our own goals, identify worthy, patriotic people, professionals and support their all-belarusian people's assembly in the parliamentary elections, i'm not hiding anything, and you have nothing to hide, but these should be professionals, worthy... people, so that when people learn about
5:25 pm
the candidates we support, they don't throw all sorts of nasty things in our faces, the president and the people who support and... represent him and his policies, the natural task is to continue the development of the state along the intended path, for which it is necessary, if we discard conventions, to maintain power, for this we need to win elections, how to win parliamentary elections, where a pro-government person must get a majority of votes in each of the constituencies, here i see a comment from especially gifted opponents about drawing the necessary numbers, lord, if they wanted to decide that way, then they would simply make the election mechanism different or not at all would cancel parliament for a referendum. for each district, the state, and this includes local authorities, and let’s say, the central committee in minsk, determines the main candidate from the government, first of all you need to choose him wisely, someone who already enjoys authority in his team, or even in the entire region, is already known for his deeds, he is honored and he is revered, when the elections begin, then the task
5:26 pm
of the state , represented by local authorities, is to inform the population who in a particular constituency the current government proposes to elect to parliament, what the person is known for, how... he has plans, a vision for the development of the district and the country as a whole, this candidate is already at the nomination stage, he is not a candidate in himself, but a representative of the state, and specifically a representative of local authorities in a specific electoral district. if he wins, he is not so much a great guy, just as if he suddenly loses or wins uncertainly, the problem is not so much with him as with the local authorities. in fact, a parliamentary campaign for the president is an obvious and good tool for assessing local power by the population. let's imagine that in in some city , a candidate nominated and supported by the local authorities enters parliament, but with difficulty and not with confidence. what happens next? of course, he will work in parliament; by the way, the fact that he passed with difficulty does not mean that he will be
5:27 pm
a bad deputy, but the hypothetically low percentage in the elections speaks more likely not of him as a candidate, but of the local authorities, who may have made a mistake with the choice of a person whom they decided to support in the constituency there or did not support enough during the election campaign, but most likely, if at all frankly, a low level of support for a pro-government candidate in parliamentary elections will indicate that in this district they did not trust a specific candidate who has a name, surname and place of work, they did not trust the local authorities as a whole, which means that perhaps the local authorities there are not working hard, there are many unresolved problems that irritate the population, few jobs, low average wages , bad roads, coprimo... poor quality or something else, whatever, all this has no direct relation to the elections to the house of representatives, but weak support for a pro-government person in the elections will naturally become a reason for the state to study the district and make a personnel decision on them, not because the percentage in the elections is insufficient, but
5:28 pm
because this percentage showed that the executive power in this region is not sufficiently supported by the population, i will say the thought , which may seem surprising, in belarus, yes... the chairmen of executive committees are appointed by the president, they are not elected, as elsewhere, but in fact, every electoral campaign is also an election for each of regional leaders, whether he continues to work or needs to be changed, and they change leaders because they can’t cope, even if the official wording is different. if the movement is based on personnel, especially as i read here, by agreement of the parties, this means that the manager did not cope well. and alexander grigorievich also gave one simple order to all representatives of the executive branch, and not just the newly appointed ones: do not get into the situation, in quotes, do not get into the situation. you know, especially those
5:29 pm
who worked in the agricultural sector, what is it like to get into a situation, they will now come to you and tell you that this or that is impossible, but as i often say, we are not at war, we are doing it. force your subordinates to do it. i’ll now take a step aside and try to tell you my understanding of the question of why personnel not only decide everything, but this is the main difficulty in any management process. as a basis, i will take the course on the theory of public administration and this diagram called the functional relationship of the state as a leading subject social management and basic spheres of life. society in the case of belarus, it would be rational for the subject of social management to mean specifically the president of the republic of belarus, now using an everyday example, what is the personnel difficulty, let’s imagine an ordinary school in an ordinary city, in which the roof needs to be urgently changed so that it does not
5:30 pm
fall on the students’ heads , the school director has an understanding of the problem, but his functionality does not allow him to solve this problem somehow independently, the school director addresses with this question, where to the education department of the district executive committee, where a specialist accepts the problem, reports to the head of the department, and he instructs another specialist to work on the question of whether it really needs to be changed urgently? this specialist requests information from the ministry of emergency situations: is the roof in emergency condition? an employee of the ministry of emergency situations accepts the application, passes it on to his supervisor , he instructs his deputy to organize a visit to the site, he instructs this to a lower-ranking officer, who goes, inspects the roof, issues an order, it needs to be changed urgently, the order he returns along the chain to the education department, where our specialist, since the change needs to be done urgently, will forward the question to the housing department, where , to begin with, the specialist, having accepted the problem... reported to his head of the department, and he instructs his deputy to figure out who
5:31 pm
is to blame for the fact that the roof of the building entrusted to them has come to such a disrepair, the deputy clarifies this with the head of the service organization, he naturally asks the head of the site: the question is who was punished, what is most often interesting to the viewer first turn, in this case is secondary for us, but the heads of the housing department report on the culprits, after which he instructs another deputy to work on the issue of repairs, which one is specifically needed? this deputy entrusts the task to a specific executor, who goes to the site, inspects the roof, writes an order about what repairs are needed, the order is returned to the head of the housing department, with him, as well as the head of the education department, they go to the economic department, where they designate what repairs does this one need? school, the head of the department instructs a specialist to work out an estimate, which, together with a note in transit through the desk of the head of the economics department, ends up on
5:32 pm
the desk of the deputy chairman of the regional executive committee for the social sphere, who looks at all these documents, understands the problem, but just in case, instructs the control and audit department to clarify is there really a need for repairs at the school and is it urgent and is the estimate too inflated. the head of kruu entrusts this to his specialist, who checks everything, comes up with ways to reduce the cost of repairs, returns the estimate to management. from where the estimate, changed through agreement with the housing construction department, is returned to the deputy chairman’s desk, he sees that the amount still remains decent, but he makes the decision on repairs, although just in case, he transfers the entire package of documents along with the proposed decision for approval to the chairman of the district executive committee, who and the final decision must be made at the district level. for now we will stop at this level, because further there is a regional level, where the budget is set for repairs, organizations and so on. there is also a ministerial level,
5:33 pm
a government-wide level for state programs, and a legislative level in terms of the adoption of some kind of regulatory framework. but even at the district level , in this simplest issue, where the intricacies of the interaction of specialists as an example, are given minimally, believe me, in resolving the issue of emergency roof repair at a school, 15 people are involved, from the school director to the head of the district. quantity. people in this the scheme is most often much larger, the interactions between decision-making subjects are not tens, hundreds. and if in this scheme, in any section of it, there is at least one person who performs duties in bad faith, the issue is either procrastinating or not resolved, in principle, the stability of the system for resolving the issue of fifteen specialists depends on this one person, but it is working only when when all its participants do not drop out of the process, and if...' one frame cannot work, does not want to, has been postponed for later, is not in the right mood, does not know what to do
5:34 pm
or knows, but does not have time, the efficiency of the work of the remaining fourteen subjects is sharply reduced, at the country level there are hundreds of thousands of such subjects , there are billions of interactions between them, and i am not exaggerating, to find in the country hundreds of thousands of specialists in various fields who would perform exemplary work every day their responsibilities, yes, it is very difficult, and as for me, this is the horizon line that... the personnel issue, i think, will always be one of the main ones, because it will always not be resolved completely, but in a situation with the roof of the school, where the issue was nominally resolved 15 man, it would be very wrong if the blame for the lack of solution to the problem was publicly placed on one person, most often for people the director is to blame, his school, his roof, but the first demand in this situation is from the chairman of the district executive committee, whose task is not to solve local . with roofs, and to manage personnel, that is, to make sure that in any situation, in any scheme, all his specialists
5:35 pm
in the area work 100%, the interaction between them to resolve issues is as effective as possible, if efficiency no, the chairman’s task is to change personnel, to force, to beg, to deprive bonuses, to award bonuses for successful work, whatever, it ’s all at his discretion, but a good leader is one who builds a process for effective interaction between his staff, but does not interfere in resolving issues, because this is not necessary, this has a concrete example: on friday, alexander lukashenko in the mogilev region studied options for how the government is going to... put any potholes in order, restore all this, the most important thing for the agricultural town and for rural areas, is that there is a development here, and there are such streets, between fences 5 and 6 m, if we do everything according to the standards, we need to disturb
5:36 pm
people, we need to demolish these standards, we need to demolish and change, i’ll tell you already he said why climb there, well, you have to be careful about 5 m. this is exactly the principle that was implemented, we worked here on the principle of routine maintenance, which gave us the opportunity to avoid a number of lengthy procedures that no one needs, such as obtaining permits, developing a project, its examination and approval, there is indeed, a number of technical regulations that we had to deviate from here, given that, in our opinion, it turned out to be quite effective, we ask you to agree on such approaches for application. we shouldn’t talk, we shouldn’t waste time, we should do it faster. to begin with, in which already in which area, alexander lukashenko says that we need to stop dealing with bureaucracy, this is very important. standards, that is, laws are written not abstractly by the state, but by specific people, and not for the abstract society, but for specific people. and if these
5:37 pm
standards do not suit specific people, then other specific people should rewrite these standards, and not assign them. some third specific people to force the former to comply with the current standards, and sometimes, to paraphrase the classic, there is no time for standards, their logic and rationality are more important, and note that specifically in the agricultural town of vishov, the system of executive power in the person of the deputy prime minister and the minister of construction , they independently came to the conclusion that it was faster it would have been more economical and correct to refuse to strictly observe all the procedures; after the withdrawal, it was decided to put the streets in order without complying with all the standards, but in a way that would be best for the people in a particular locality. this work was completed, only then was it reported to the president. there was no question somewhere up in this chain, alexander grigorievich, we think that this is possible, tell me, is it possible? and the question here is not that let ’s not comply with the standards, we will
5:38 pm
mandatory, but outside of brackets are those bureaucratic regulations that contradict logic, and not their implementation. limited by the time frame for the adoption of new regulations. i am sure that the decision to change the standards across the country was made simultaneously with the decision not to adhere to them, specifically in vieszov. and this is exactly what the president demands from the executive branch to make decisions and be masters of the earth. and as for me, this is a vivid example of a successful redistribution of powers, along with responsibility, which the head of state promised several years ago. not everyone is ready for this, not everyone wants it, not everyone wants a redistribution of responsibility. but they would only like a redistribution of powers, which translates as they would like more power, but there will be controllers for such executors, especially since lukashenko has much more sources of information than official rapporteurs. it was already late in the evening, i arrived, didn’t have time to look, i immediately got a complaint, so they took the tractor to mtz, under its own power, drove it there, drove it,
5:39 pm
faulty, well, well, he says, it works promptly... we have this emergency service for the guarantees for tomorrow have arrived, some kind of hose has been replaced, is this normal? no, of course, so quality, once again quality, we must be responsible for this. and lastly, on friday, alexander lukashenko talked with residents of the agricultural town of vishov, because, naturally, the entire outskirts knew well that the president would come, and if they didn’t know, then they wouldn’t notice the head of state’s helicopter landing right next to the road, that’s all... no way impossible, i , as a frequent witness to such meetings, will also say the obvious, people most often come with a simple the main motive is to look at the president, say at least a few words to him, thank him for something, for them this is an event and it’s good when the visit of the head of state is a holiday for them, and not when they are intimidated in advance by local officials, you are standing here, but
5:40 pm
not here stand there, speak only like this, smile like this, if someone needs it, then someone...’ but not the president. alexander grigorievich, in my humble opinion, needs such meetings in order to personally understand the mood of his people. he also considers it necessary to explain personally some of his decisions that affect all citizens of the country, but these directly. thank you very much. you know, i’ll tell you, it’s already a little secret, large families, families, of course we will carefully study them, because they are different. yes, we will think about how to do this so that the money reaches the children, we need to find a mechanism, the second category is the military, they should not worry that they will not have housing, they should at least be given housing so that they can go and fight, but they knew that their children and wife were in the apartment, so
5:41 pm
this is a prospect, well, the rest must earn money, we are already there with a loan, we will help with something else, but we must move, it seems to me that according to the military, everything is clear , it doesn’t need any explanation, with regards to large families, let’s put this right in the information field the topic is complex, because our enemies will easily twist some decisions to the sides. well, i guess, i will do less to the shmatdzet families, i guess, like the bloodworms of this regime. but if you, the live-action spectator, do not have rose-colored glasses, then you see that having many children can be very different, and there are families where having children again is a strategy to get an apartment for pennies or for nothing, and then these children are malnourished, do not get enough sleep, suffer and suffer, especially if the allowance for them from the state is spent by their parents on furniture, they need furniture for a free apartment, i’ll say: probably not popular, when it comes to the fact that the state supports large families, we are talking only about children, not adults. and let's say, the order of a mother is gratitude to a woman for heroism, for the children
5:42 pm
she gave birth to, and is capable of raising. educate yourself. but the state offers help, which, of course, no one refuses. sorry, but there is nothing heroic about giving birth to children without having the slightest idea of how to feed them, clothe them, and raise them. don't we? families where there are three, four, five children, and the parents arrive on child benefits, and the children are then sopovites, grow up on the street as hooligans and often grow up to be criminals, the children are not to blame for this, the adults are to blame for this, but such large families and others - they are very different and the mechanisms for supporting children, only children in large families should also be different, to hell with it, i’ll say it even more bluntly, giving birth should not be a financial alternative to a job, even an isolated one... such a case is monstrous, the state has its function of supporting the protection of children performs and will always perform, but it is scary for the children themselves, when parents
5:43 pm
for whom children are a financial instrument do not fulfill their function, such parents must be forced to be parents, options for solving this issue are certain the president will be offered, or perhaps immediately implemented, reporting to the head of state about implementation and not about intentions, so it seems to me, my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda review of the most important sporting events, the new head coach of the national team carlos allasphere named an expanded list of players for september qualifying matches for the european championship 2024. two gold, silver and three. this is the result of the belarusian wrestlers at the world youth championship, which jordan hosted an exclusive interview with the athletes, tell me, this one
5:44 pm
result, 1092 you repeated and surpassed in the training process, well, i was ready to show faster than a second, it was there in athens, yes, if it was one race, not four, bright moments, real emotions, thousands of fans came to celebrate the women's... the spanish national team, which won the world cup, the impressions are only positive , one of the most spectacular, one of the most exciting sports, all this is in the sports projects on the belarus 24 tv channel, the secrets of good morning and good mood. don't forget that a smile is the most inexpensive way to look better. meeting amazing people, all of you are artists. you look at each one, you can film about each one. cinema, what if you sprinkle everything with apples, just sprinkle everything, can i be an artist for 5 minutes, i can do any profession, i just don’t know how to do injections yet, and there’s also
5:45 pm
12 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Belarus TV Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on