almost a day later, from under the ruins, they managed to extract a girl who was less than a year old, the child turned out to be alive and even healthy, how is this even possible under such tests? meanwhile, the number of victims of natural disaster in the country continues to grow, the afghan authorities report 25 however, these data are clearly inconclusive. the epicenter of the earthquake with a magnitude of 6.3 was located near the city of herat. destruction was recorded throughout the country. due to the lack of special equipment, debris removal is carried out manually and can take weeks if not months. the consequences of storm winds are being eliminated in belarus. over the past 24 hours , power supply has been disrupted in more than 800 settlements. those who suffered the most were the consequences of the bad weather. pukhovichi,

baranovichi, gomel and minsk districts. falling trees and branches on power lines were the main cause of outages. in the mogilev region, as a result of bad weather , the power supply to 128 settlements was disrupted. strong winds damaged the roofs of seventeen buildings. these are 10 agricultural buildings goritsky district, two mstislav special boarding schools , three state farm buildings in babruysky district, two residential buildings in gluzka and osipovichi. subdivision. the regional ministry of emergency situations made 66 trips to clean up fallen trees. in mogilev and the kruglyansky district , fallen tree trunks damaged two residential buildings and damaged three cars in mogilev, babruisk and shklov. the steam wind that raged in the grodno region reached 24 m/s all weekend. 93 fallen trees were recorded, 85 of them on the roadway and private farmsteads. energy supply was violated in more than 450 settlements . restoration work

continues. this week expects contrasting weather, wind, rain, sleet, frost and a fleeting burst of heat. on tuesday wednesday at night across the country the maximum will be +5, in some places frosts down to -4, in the daytime up to 17 degrees celsius. by the end of the week, on thursday, autumn will enjoy comfortable weather. on thursday it will become warmer for a short time, +6-14° is expected at night and +12 during the day. 15 degrees, on friday night + 2.8° and during the day + 8:15 degrees. for the beginning of october this arctic weather pattern is below climate norm by 4°. more information about my colleagues 15 hours. with this i say goodbye to you, all the best.

good evening, dmitry evgenievich, belarusian tv viewers see dmitry kulyakov almost every day on the air of the largest russian tv channels, well, you speak brightly, actively , often uncompromisingly, but who is dmitry kulikov in more detail, so help me figure it out and our tv viewers, who also your fans are in belarus. on the one hand, we have a lot in common.

age, we are tv presenters on significant tv channels, studied political technologies, took part in election campaigns, well, they were included in the sanctions lists of western countries, yes, on the other hand , the film production industry, this is generally unknown to me , i won’t hide it, so let’s start with something simpler, with winter politics, outside of which probably no one exists today by definition, that’s how you... yourself came into politics, a guy from shakhtyorsk who dreamed of not mining coal, and maybe even following the path of his parents, saving people’s lives, did i come to politics, that's you see, also such words, we have a substantive understanding there, as if they understand, yes, well, you should either be an official or a deputy, well , then you came into politics, yes, this is a substantive understanding, but there is a broader one,

attention, i i belong to it, well, i belong to it, yes, this is politics - this is what, in principle, ideally, every person should engage in it, yeah, but again, you and i said. not a single generation, but in the soviet union, in the soviet project, there was such a curse that, in principle, every person should engage in politics, for he needs to be educated for this, yeah, and the soviet union provided this, that was the main thing, they often laugh, about lenin, yes, the cook will be able to rule the state, well, yes, but... there is nothing to laugh about, for this she must stop to be a cook, and the soviet project gives her such an opportunity, of course, in that life, she was a cook , she was born, relatively speaking, well, a cook, she will die a cook, yes, and the soviet project

gave her the opportunity to lead the state, in principle , to get an education, prepare, learn, change your lifestyle. therefore, i believe that politics is a sphere in which in the future , well, all people in general will take part, and we must achieve this, every person must be able to adequately engage in politics, we must strive for this, but we are still very all of humanity is far from this, far away, not just you and me in belarus or russia, all of humanity in general, but in principle, if we talk about some of them. then this is such a prospect, on the other hand, you know, there is a common word, we even perceive it as abusive, idiot, well, although dostoevsky, yes, dostoevsky wrote it, but it’s important to remember the

origin of this word, it has ancient greek origin, there was nothing offensive in it, on the one hand on the other hand, on the other hand, it’s very offensive, an idiot is a person who is not capable of engaging in politics, well , the meaning of the translation is close, there are different interpretations, but this is practically the most direct one, but if we translate it in a simplified way, the ancient greeks already understood that a person, who is not capable of engaging in politics , but he is, let’s say, somewhat special , yes, so excuse me for this preamble, yes, but i should, i should have said what it means , yes, to engage in politics. well, in this sense, i’ve been very lucky since childhood, because at home , in the home library, my father collected in a targeted way, he put aside some money from each salary, well, doctors didn’t get very much there, but they saved how much - some money, and there, as it were, with

friends in bookstores, here he is, he is with almost every salary brought a certain amount of books; we had more than a thousand volumes at home. well, homemade, well, let’s be honest, it was one of the greatest assets of any normal soviet family, and i started reading all this when i was about five years old, that ’s about it, and i read while i ate continuously, well, until i was 15 years old, that’s exactly how it is if not, well, i was walking, there was all the banditry, the indians, everything, well, everything that was needed was all there, this does not mean that i sat only reading books, but i managed to do both, i read a lot, here is a miner . city ​​library me and my friend was considered very strange children, because we probably went to the miners’ children ’s library for three or four years, every week, on wednesday, with these two bags, we collected 10-12 books and took them home to wednesday

, for a week, on wednesday they were returned, just like that, well, i just understood that somehow, since childhood, probably through books, right? that real life is so human, it is somewhere here in the sphere of historical and political processes, and this i can already say now, in general it is necessary to know that every person lives in history, he of course lives on planet earth, in the city, minsk or moscow or shakhtersk, but in general he lives in history, because exactly this historical space corresponds, well, to the life of humanity. to each individual person, as a part of him, a representative, that’s why i, well, i guessed at first , yes, then as an adult, i somehow realized that this is real life, it’s in this, well, space , and you need

to get there, you can get there, no matter where you are born, in a small miner, or in big moscow, some political companies not only leave... a mark on history, but they actually make this history, so you are credited with working in election campaigns in russia and ukraine, and kuchma and.. yanukovych, yatsenyuk, prokhorov, and painstaking work, from developing theses and ideas to conveying them to the electorate, that’s where the truth is, in my words, yes, or there are some inaccuracies, about which of the clients we can say that this is it won or lost, maybe some client especially

remembered, and you can say about this, you know, won, lost, did they, well, how would they achieve their goals, well, well, i think that to one degree or another, in the overwhelming majority of cases they achieved, well, if you start with the same kuchma there in ninety -nine years, yes, well, the situation there was similar to the fact that, well, it’s like an unsolvable problem, that is. but it was possible to decide whether victory was always the main result that you wanted to achieve, or whether it was a task, let’s say, i want to gain so much percentage, or come in second place, third, it happens in different ways, again, yes, it happens in different ways, but as a rule, these are the specifics of my work in this area, yes , especially when we were actively involved in this, we usually took on unsolvable tasks, well this

this is so, well, they know this, yes, i’m not bragging now, but give an example of an unsolvable problem, for example, in ukraine there, a company from 1999, viktor pevnchukov, later, this is the son-in-law of president kuchma, he was elected in dnepropetrovsk , in the city of dnepropetrovsk in such a proletarian district, where only after privatization he received the plant. dnepropetrovsk region, and on such grounds, you know, not political, yes, in principle, victor was not his, pinchuk was not his man, and in this sense he went against the structure, well, with all this money, and there it’s just that when we were looking for someone who could take over this company, many people came there. well, people there said no, we won’t take it, we’ll leave, yeah, so, and all this was

there 2 and a half months before the elections, that is, in a very short period, well, in principle, this situation was recognized as unsolvable, but there were other situations of the same type, but this is interesting, okay, so explain to me how easy it is to force an adult self-sufficient, i would even say arrogant to a certain extent , person, to speak in your words. i’ve never done this, well, you discuss with a person how you discuss a situation, you go through it many times from different sides, in order to understand, it is important that the person understands for himself, well, what it is, how it works, after that he he easily finds those words that correspond to his understanding, his understanding, not mine, that is, you tried to find these words, we tried, we deeply studied every situation of the election

campaign, political, there, economic, situation in the field, we worked on it together, so that a person, well, grows his understanding so much that he can calmly, i don’t at all, you know, this is all, well, this is all, that ’s what you said, this all comes from the american school, this political technology school, that’s it. we need to sell the candidate lies, this is our post-soviet man, don’t buy anyone the candidate is going to, well, you know, write a general speech, such a speech for all occasions, and then we are from the blocs, this is all charlatanism, well, from my point of view, someone may think differently, i’m not saying that everyone should think since i, no, shouldn’t, okay, then how do you feel about the fact that... some experts call you a very effective and professional manipulator,

but at the same time they do not hesitate to accuse you that having brought the same yanukovych to power, you are a little whether they provoked and almost guilty of the orange revolution? well, yes, i was guilty of everything, well, first of all, about the word manipulator, i don’t know what they want to say with this, well, so to speak, no one has ever been on my hand, that’s all... well, that’s it from the word hand, and manipulate, yes, this is all nonsense, well, maybe someone, for some reason, says such words, you know what’s the matter. well, really, if we talk about 2004, that’s a difficult situation, which after which there was an orange revolution, so it turned out smoothly because yanukovych de facto won,

well, in the second round, i just know that, but not by much, by one and a half, by 2%. but he won and this became, well, the reason for the orange revolution, that is, this is precisely what did not work, no, it did not work, this became the reason, because they could not do it any other way, the united states could not do it any other way, because well, i don’t know there anymore , what is my role, so to speak, but the role of the fact that there was a revolution is the role of the united states, because yushchenko led the entire headquarters and company and the embassy directly, literally, they we went by car to all the events, when yushchenko’s deputies were destroying warehouses with products of third candidates, not yanukovych, there were cars from the embassy nearby and american diplomats were sitting there watching, monitoring everything, everyone was happy with it, well,

that’s why you the question is, who created, well, the orange revolution? well, yes, i, we, we really , work, well, yanukovych’s victory really took place, actually took place, and precisely because it took place, the americans staged the orange revolution, because here, well, it’s like a bunch, you understand, who manipulated whom, that is, if i then, if in this pledge, this is how you conveyed someone’s question, or something, an opinion, then it must be said that kulyakov manipulated the american embassy, ​​i agree. and i like this answer, yes, i agree, these 2 years, 23 and 24, you must agree, they are replete with election campaigns, the end of the twenty-third, the 24th then the beginning of the twenty-fifth, slovakia now, poland in october, so, usa, russia, ukraine , i don’t even remember georgia, and then we are belarusians, yes, in

204 and 25, since we are not challenging. as a tribute to experience in any case, then for the second and third, that is, poland and the usa, i will ask for forecasts, and for the last one for belarus, advice, the latter will not happen, well, i have great respect for the belarusian state for the belarusian people, so ... i think that you are all doing the right thing, and in general are overcoming such problems, a young, in the historical sense, state that is becoming, which many have not been able to overcome, and not only in the post-soviet space in the world,

is accepted as a fact, but this is a very historical activity, it always happens at... death, so far you are coping with this matter, well, several crises have historically been resolved, i am sure that it will continue to be so, here everything is fine, so i won’t advise anything, just so to speak, out of respect for what, in my opinion, is the way it is in the post-soviet space, so... belarus is definitely, at least, well, if not completely proven historically, then shown what can she do, well, unlike many, we were lucky with the president, yes, because i have something to compare with, so i’ll tell you that when i saw alexander grigorievich, with a machine gun, and with his son, many there giggled something, well

, by the way, i swore at them very strongly, not in impartial words at those who giggled, because... i understood, again with my historical philosophical bias, that alexander grigorievich accurately understands the relationship between power and its price, this is life, in fact, and his readiness to protect the state from death, well, even at the cost of his life, this is a very strong not just a gesture, but this is a deep understanding... of nature , historical nature, of the things with which we are dealing, because there, if you go back to the fourteenth year, when the same yanukovych fled, that’s it he has... in this sense, ukraine, that’s because, well, well, i don’t want to be here, it’s just like, it

’s diametrical, yes, well, diametrical approaches, how a statesman disconnects from a politician, well, politics, that’s how if you want, i ’ll say another thing, many will dispute it again, but i will say that this is lukashenko’s behavior. points view was motivated primarily by state, and not personal interest, although many interpret, yes , this behavior is personal, this is an unfair interpretation , false, because exactly the opposite is true, that’s why i said about belarus that i think, yes , and i think, by the way, here is this formula, to finish, here is this formula, which also in my opinion. lukashenko proposed two countries and one fatherland, well, he’s somehow close, at least he said many times, regarding russia, we have one fatherland, yes, we have, yes, from brest to vladevostok it’s straight

i said about this, that’s what you understand, how, after all, the russian empire in its history , it’s kind of unique, i’m not afraid of this word, because there are no such examples in the world where uh... culturally diverse , ethnic, religious communities, even in the early periods of history, when this did not exist at all, well, typical there since the middle ages or the enlightened absolutism of the era, they had, well, such equal opportunities as in principle then at all... in principle it was possible to think, this is the story of what russia can do,

big russia, to live as a form of coexistence of a common, fundamentally different, yeah, not assimilated , you know, i understand, but fundamentally different, to draw your strength from this, this is the civilizational difference, and when, well, i... i don’t know how it is here you have in belarus, but sometimes i hear all sorts of responses there, yes, well, like russia over there will swallow you up, well, it will swallow us up there, this is called dishonest responses, using washal, has the right to be mistaken, but god bless him, but i’m calm about i relate to this, i say, this is wrong, this is wrong, another process is important, but a huge number of peoples, the russian empire and the soviet... union came from assimilation by other peoples, it is from this process that you are afraid that russia will swallow you up, so you look at history, russia created

the conditions so that you have been preserved unassimilated, by the poles there, the turks, well, in any direction, yes, look , this is a historical function, and as i understand it... the belarusian people, the majority, and the leader, and the president, understand this, here that we can calmly, in in this sense, there is no guile in the words that we are building on an equal footing, well, some large community, this is absolutely certain, there is no guile here, we are really building it on an equal footing, despite the fact that russia is large, so to speak, and rich there are minerals there... and something else, which means, well, belarus is a small state, understandable, but this is not determined by this, because equality is determined by

the cultural and historical meaning in the future, understandably, we can return to the poles, we need return to the poles and americans, forecast, yes, you know, here i want to say , but in general i don’t care, in general it doesn’t matter, that is, you think it doesn’t depend on the elections... nothing, no, well, something, probably , it depends, now i’m going to refute myself, i think there, for example, that trump didn’t suddenly jump out in 1916, this gave russia four, well, at least 2 years without war, because if there had been a clinton, the war would have ukraine and maybe much wider in ukraine, and maybe belarus would be there too it turned out. all this would have started no later than the eighteenth year, if there had been a clinton, that’s why there are such people, how to prove it, here

we are again now, i can here. chain, but i am deeply convinced of this, in this sense, the sudden appearance of trump gave us, but also russia, first of all, four or at least two, so to speak, extra years, which we made good use of, used them correctly, so therefore, something probably depends; a situation may happen in america that they will not be able to cope with the election. process, and what will cause this? economy? everything is there, they, in fact, have a systemic crisis, and the economy, politics, they practically can’t talk to each other anymore, well, one america to another, so, but many believe that it has always been this way, you know , it was not always like this, because until the end of the nineteenth century , they lived relying on their own resources

, yes, this... has always been an oligarchic state, from the moment of its inception, because few people, for example , know, yes, that this is the people, why the constitution begins, so these people, i think there were 16 or 18,000 people in all of america, well, those who were admitted, and hundreds of thousands more there were not allowed to have voting rights, and this has always been the case, the law is discriminatory black voting was abolished in 1966. uh-huh, you and i were born there immediately after that, in the last states where discrimination of voting rights disappeared, here it is, this is the sixty-sixth year, so, but how is it that a small group of worthy people will... this

was conceived from the very beginning, and this is how it was built, well, from there there were qualifications , all that stuff, and while this small group was dealing with the territory of america, and, as it were, with its own resources, there were difficulties there, of course, and even before the civil war they were figuring it out , that for them the biggest cataclysm still remains, so to speak, the civil war, but when they took this model out and said that they would now deal with the whole world like this, then real problems began, but then you understand, one it’s a matter of maintaining such a system in conditions of resource abundance, and another thing is in conditions of resource scarcity, these are, as they said in odessa, two big differences, and the united states since the late sixties of the last century has been living in a situation, citing resources, in

fact, as a socio-economic system , they lost to the soviet union, if we consider this, well, as if as an experiment, but a scientific one, because , well, having used the printing of dollars and the refusal to fill this very dollar with gold, now they have been living in a situation since then virtual debt. many people say: so what , so what? 32 three? 33 already, already 33, yes, 33. i think that very quickly, now a trillion will be added literally every six months, well, okay, this is like a outline , after all, as a result, trump faces 600 years, 600 years in prison , handsome, biden, well, let's get straight to it, he can barely move, what is the result?

there will still be elections, there will be elections, or they will dismiss both of them, well, the old people, someone young will jump out, but this must be decided within a week, either these two titans will come together, then that’s it may completely fall apart, that’s because, well, screwing trump a second time, it won’t work with postal services , well, it won’t work, yes, they will get along, well, they will get along, that’s necessary in principle, i proceed from the fact that in america, in hidden forms, civil the war is already underway, it is often already and seems to be taking on obvious forms, so if this scenario remains, that two powerful old men will come together, then this is fraught with a transition to open forms of civil war, inside the country, inside the country they are afraid and inside the country, poland ? even less

we are interested, because at least tusk, at least this second one, which is european, for belarus and for russia, it’s the same thing, in general. will there be more problems with anyone, who should win there, and this is also not important, but many of our people, you know, raikin, of our youth, had this in his reprises, this is a very interesting topic in the dissertation, something in the nose , yes, many of us like it, yes, if kochinsky is there, then he will irritate the european union there, it’s kind of useful for us, well, that’s it. this is your cream or sour cream, that’s it, that’s it, well there will probably be, here, there will be a dimness, but then the right, so to speak, the polish ones will be very irritated by this dimness, well

, you see, the problem of poland is the following, it can be briefly formulated, it wants to be an empire, being national, almost nationalistic by the state. national as always, but this is not , well, you understand, this is impossible, and a mono-national state, this is different, this is different, here they are, well, here they are, as if there is a problem here, yes, well, polish, we are happy : we continue to talk about cities of belarus. the starting point of our route, like most tourists, is the station square, the author’s routes. it’s hard to believe, but once upon a time there were ancient forests on this land, and

the largest trade route from varyak to the greeks passed here. the most mysterious places. a unique timepiece in the heart of broadway. initially there were no arrows on them. later they appeared, but the clock did not show the correct time. interesting myths. legends say that here in the central square under the asphalt a unique paving stone has been preserved, it is here brought in soviet times from krevsky castle, watch in the program of the city of belarus on our tv channel. why have children become a bargaining chip for ukraine? yes, because this country is bankrupt and today the west is paying for weapons; it can only buy black soil and its future. ukrainians who find themselves in european union countries tell terrible stories. i have never heard such a monstrous drinking incident anywhere, when ruser is at home, right away, it’s just like a product. in mariupol, i was given several books about ukrainian nationalism, the appearance of one of them

dated 1950. this is only confirmation that after the announcement of the ussr’s victory over the nazis, germany and bandera continued their underground struggle with the support of the west. in belarus. mikoshenko exists, he saved, it would have been the same, maybe even worse, the author’s project of ksenia lebedeva is different. watch new episodes on the belarus 24 tv channel. 24 a day, 7 days a week, we are working to keep you up to date with current events in the country and the world. also, the team. our journalists obtain valuable valuables from experts knowledge of how to maintain and increase health. there is also room for entertainment. every friday we bring to your attention the best projects and films of our tv channel. this and

much more awaits you in the weekly project ether 24.7. watch on tv channel belarus 24. dmitry, back in the 1990s, you talked about the strategy of confrontation between the united states and russia, medium and long-term, warned about sanctions, about the participation of ngos and foundations, in the dehumanization of russia, in preventing yeltsinism, and so on, yes. i understand that there are certain echoes of the same philosophy of zinoviev , as i see it, yes, who 40 years ago spoke about the americanization of europe, and that europe will ultimately be completely determined by america. okay, so what lessons

have russia learned from its mistakes, including what needs to be done? well, after all, almost 15 years have passed. well, look, the fact that i said this, yes, this is not a great merit , because in principle it is necessary, well, just to have a historical view, yes, because here we are...' we often say there the nineties we curse and there is a reason for it, i’m not talking about what’s bad now, we are hiding the depth of the problems behind the nineties, well, we cursed the nineties and sort of figured it out, everything is wrong, because the processes that brought us to the most critical points of the late nineties, they began much earlier, even perestroika, they began in the sixties. years is what i mean? well, firstly,

the consumer society, yeah, it was completely brought to us under khrushchev, when he and nixon started having these videos to talk about the fact that we have kitchen food processors in every soviet apartment are no worse than your food processors, that’s all , and then it all ended with the fact that in the charter, the goal of the communist party is to increasingly satisfy the ever-growing material and spiritual needs of the soviet people, by the way, how can one satisfy everything is constant, well, constantly growing, so someone can logically say so, well, maybe after all, the emphasis was on the spiritual, and on the spiritual, yes, but he meant that this is, as it were, a cast or formula of a consumer society. when a person,

this is a statement that, well, for what a person was born, they used to suffer, yes, what is the meaning of life, what did life give you , well, first of all, well, for life, no need to bother, for life, just, here, for fun , well, life, you have to live life with pleasure, that’s all, these are the elements that arose then, by the way, the fact that the collapse closed with exactly the lack of vcr beer and jeans in a wide range, well, notice how the program worked, well, people were promised that they will be given all this for 30 years, and they didn’t give them spiritual distance, but jeans canned beer and vcrs, every soviet family will live by 200, an apartment, but no, there are generally deep things there, you know, no one.

doesn’t understand, we haven’t written the true history of the soviet period at all, we haven’t figured it out , by the way, if we talk about the lessons that we haven’t done, yes, then we haven’t done this completely, no one realizes that means that khrushchev promised that the soviet people would live in communism by the year 1980, yeah, this is for each according to his needs, and from each according to his ability, and the soviets people came out, saw the olympics, and they saw communism in 1980. what does this mean? and this means that, well, it’s as if the authorities lied, this is, well, in fact, and you walk down the street, we, well, we are of the same generation, you walk down the street and see a poster: party, intelligence, honor and the conscience of our era, so the wisdom and conscience of our era promised that there would be communism in the year 1980, and in many of our cities oil disappeared at that time, you know, and that’s sort of why. how people feel about svo, and me in general

i think that we are on the verge of a rather large, well, military confrontation, how will it unfold there, i’m not a fortune teller, yes, but the americans will not just give up, and they won’t just leave, this also needs to be understood, but again we have you, as people of the same generation , remember that for soviet people, if only there was no war. it was official, generally peaceful people, in general you, well, relative to the population, the greatest losses of the great patriotic war were belarus, if i ’m not mistaken, a third of the population, yes, but i don’t i’m wrong, because when i was a child, my father took me to khatyn, to brest, to minsk, as a boy, so that i could see it all with my own eyes, that’s why this thing was used, against it, because well, in what sense do we not

want war until what degree, yes, well, that is, we’ll kind of give up our mother, but only so that there won’t be a war, where is this border , this isn’t, well, it wasn’t discussed later, you know, when afghanistan happened, i’m not discussing now whether it’s necessary or not, but at the same time, i definitely had to go there i definitely think that the military there is a task there. fulfilled, but since we soviet people then betrayed our soviet army in afghanistan, yeah, that’s where it all started, then the subsequent collapse, so to speak, yes, i didn’t send you there. that’s all it was, so you see, these are the lessons of history, it’s very important to get to the depth where something really originated , to understand, respectively, how it grew and how it grew here, then you have a chance

to correct something, but dmitry, you have already posed these questions a long time ago, yes, which many of our people are afraid, well, they think that they are too global or vague, although for me personally it is important to live with a super idea, well, i like difficult questions, this is normal, here is one of your questions, can we offer the world an alternative to the system , to which imposed consumption is the main content of human essence, yes life, yes life. well, we now have snickers, well, it’s clear that the spiritual sank a little at some point, especially, as we say at this stage in the nineties, the end of the eighties, well, i just claim that she had asked before, there was simply an unrestrained outburst, but in

the nineties, you know, i sometimes get the feeling that the politicians themselves who came to power in the soviet union gave it a go . well, i don’t see how one could not be ashamed, yes, one could not be ashamed, and frankly speaking, even remembering the same zinoviev again, he clearly changed his views, at first he was an ardent anti-stalinist, to the point that he was ready was to kill stalin, yes, and then at the end of the thirties, he created a conspiracy, yes , at the end of his life he spoke exactly the opposite, cursed with his last words, yes, but in fairness it must be said that he came out in defense of stalin immediately after his death, because when he passed the twentieth congress in the scientific community, a congress of opportunists, that’s what zinoviev, in relation to stalin, attributes, i think

it’s true, many people said this, he told the scientific community that a forest woman can pee on a dead lion, yeah, well, in relation to .. .that like them, that means, well, alexander alexandrovich was a very complex person, and in many ways a genius, well, every brilliant person, he always says so, but that’s for sure, yes, that’s for sure, he’s here, but at the same time he’s so, he about the soviet union, of course, there were a lot of evil things, yes, he said with characteristic sarcasm, but he always wanted to achieve its improvement and development, he believed that he wanted to do this. about whether we can replace and in general, in fact, in its ultimate form , this is a question about the preservation of man, that’s why

that, of course, consumer society is only a consequence of manifestation, but because, well, this process is 500 years old... so with the revival of the generally notorious, it begins and ends at its apogee with the philosopher nietzsche, who affirmed the death of god, the voting of a superman instead of god, uh , this, this is the same thing, only one is at the beginning, and the other is at the end, because, well, this whole european part did not begin to be built. on identification with the church and religion with god, well, i came to its complete, well , absence, uh, the question is that

the superman project did not take place, the european superman project did not take place, even despite the fact that the jungle and the blooming garden, no, all this remains, they think, well, that is, the russians. they have these categories, yes, the russian essence is in the foundation of european civilization, this is the main brick, that is , these are wild hordes, bears in the streets, these are just such elements that will always sound like a narrative, how it developed this racist nature,