this does not have any positive effect on poland; everything goes somewhere. it’s time to combine all these facts into a big criminal case, but more and more photographs of those involved appear on the board of the criminal clanopis, so all that remains is to hang noodles before the elections, trying to hide behind a barbed fence, imaginary enemies and a grain scandal, things that are much dirtier, but something prompts, the main march of hate to pis is still ahead, happily ever after.

everything you wanted to know about the greatness of belarusian churches, we planned it in such a way that , after all, if the ruler believes that this the future cathedral, it... it must be majestic, because this is the face not even of the minsk diocese, but of the belarusian archaty , of the entire republic of belarus, about the power of god's word, it is advisable to take a blessing for everything, no matter what you do, for me now is very important, and somehow it immediately becomes a little easier for me to do something, that is, it seems like god is already leading me along the path of life, about the importance of family in a person’s life? eternal, he created man and said

that it is not good for man to be alone, let’s create an assistant for him, corresponding to him, and men and women are not different , but at the same time they complement each other, and overcoming life’s difficulties, the struggle of life is the moment by which the truth of love, its beauty, its strength or its edge can be revealed. we will tell you in spiritual and educational projects on the belarus 24 tv channel

. in braslavia, the sky is blue like the early sky, which is right in the racing forest, the evil dawns, the creatures and the world, and the fall is known. skies, accumulated azers, woven with charms, smiling at the suns, look for yourself, and never from the sea, the bottom , which is gilded with gold, and without end, we have accumulated not azers, as we have not been in pain for many years, so we would like to sustrezza, so as not to know, the mountains , pestilence, and i have never forgotten you, my dear sir.

remove the hell of the garadian metusna. here are your karani and your strength, go ahead, so that you can get on with yourselves, volition and at the end of the hell of the moment, in the direction of showing the elements, skin crocs, yadnannya s pyrodaj, dzikae, old-fashioned fir-tree, belarus natkhnya e.

good evening, dmitry evgenievich, good evening, belarusian tv viewers see dmitry kulyakov almost every day on the air of the largest russian tv channels. you perform brightly, actively, often uncompromisingly, but who is dmitry kulikov anymore? so help me figure it out and our tv viewers, who are also your fans in belarus, on the one hand , we have a lot in common, age, we are tv presenters on important tv channels, we studied

political technologies, took part in election campaigns, well, we are included in the sanctions lists of western countries, yes, here with the other side. the film production industry, this is generally unknown to me, i won’t hide it, so let’s start with something simpler, more mundane, with politics, outside of which probably no one exists today by definition, that’s how you yourself came into politics, a guy from shakhtyorsk who dreamed not to mine coal, and maybe even follow the path of my parents, save people’s lives, did i come into politics, you understand that? these are also the same words, but here we have a substantive understanding, as if they understand, yes, you must be either an official or a deputy, well that’s when you came to politics, yes, this is a substantive understanding, but there is a broader understanding, i’m part of it, well, i belong to it, yes, this is politics - this is something, in

principle, ideally, every person should engage in it , uh-huh, but again, you said we are of the same generation , in the soviet union there was such a curse in the soviet project that, in principle, every person should be involved in politics, for this he needs to be given an education, uh-huh, and this was provided by the soviet union, that was the main thing, they often laugh, about lenin, yes, kuharko will be able to rule the state, well, yes, but there’s nothing to laugh about, for this she must stop being a cook. and the soviet project gives her such an opportunity in that life, she was a cook and was born , relatively speaking, well, there she will die as a cook, and the soviet project gave her the opportunity

to lead the state, in principle, get an education, prepare to learn how to change her way of life, so i think this is such an area , in which in the future, well , all people in general will take part, and we must achieve this, every person must be able to adequately. engage in politics, we must strive for this, but we are still very far from this, all of humanity is far away, not only you and me in belarus or russia, all of humanity in general, but in principle, if we talk about some kind of perspective, which, about which we have always dreamed of, yes, then this is such a prospect, on the other hand, you know, there is a common word, we even perceive it as abusive, idiot, well, although dostoevsky,

there was nothing offensive on the one hand, on the other hand, it’s very offensive , idiot is a person who is not capable of engaging in politics, well , the meaning of the translation is close, there are different interpretations, but this is practically the most direct yes, if we translate it in a simplified way, the ancient greeks already understood it. that a person who is not capable of engaging in politics, but he is, let’s say, somewhat special , yes, that’s why, excuse this preamble, yes, but i should, i should have said what it means, yes, to engage in politics, but in this sense , i’ve been very lucky since childhood, because in our home, in the library, home, my father collected in a targeted way, he put aside some money from every salary, well, doctors. they didn’t earn very much there, but they saved some money and there

, as if with friends in bookstores, here he was, with almost every salary he brought a certain amount of books, in our house there were more than a thousand volumes, well, here’s homemade , well, let’s be honest, this was one of the greatest assets of any normal soviet family, and i started reading all this when i was five years old, that’s about it, and i read it continuously, well, until years ago... exactly, that’s how would, no, well, i was walking, everything was there, all the banditry, the indians, everything, well, everything that was needed, it was all there, this does not mean that i sat only with books, but i managed to do both, i read a lot a lot, in the miners' city library, my friend and i were considered very strange children , because for three or four years we probably went to the miners' children's library, every week on wednesday, with these two bags, we collected... .10-12 books and took them home, on wednesday they were for a week, on wednesday they were returned,

it’s simple and, well, i just understood that somehow from childhood, probably through books, yes , that this is real life, and such a human one, it is located somewhere here in the sphere of historical and political processes, so i can already say this now; in general, you need to know that every person lives in history. of course, he lives on planet earth, in a city, minsk or moscow or shakhtersk, but actually he lives in history, because exactly this historical space corresponds, well, to the life of humanity and to each individual person, as a part of it, a representative, that’s why i kind of guessed at first, yes, then as an adult, i somehow realized that this is real life, it’s in this. well, there is space and you need to get there, you can get there, it doesn’t matter where

you were born, in a small shakhtyorsk, or in big moscow, some political companies not only leave a mark on history, well , in fact, they make this history, so you are credited with working in election campaigns in russia and ukraine, and kuchma, yanukovych, yatsenyuk, prokhorov. and the work is painstaking, from elaborating theses and ideas to conveying them to the electorate, that’s where the truth is in my words, and whether there are any inaccuracies about which of the clients we can say that he won or lost, maybe some client was especially memorable, and you can say about this, you know, win, lose. did they achieve their goals? well, well, i think that

to one degree or another, in the overwhelming majority of cases, they have achieved it, well, if you start with the same kuchma there in 1999, yes, well, that’s the situation there similar to the fact that, well, it’s like an unsolvable problem, well, that is, he started the election campaign with some very minimal percentages, yes, but it was possible to solve it, was there always victory as the main result that you wanted to achieve, or the task melted away, let’s say i want to gain so much percentage, or there’s second place, third place, it varies, again, yes, it varies, but as a rule, these are the specifics of my work, in this area, yes , especially when we were actively involved in this, so we usually took on unsolvable tasks, well, this, this, this is so , well, well, they know this, yes, i’m not bragging now, but give

an example of an unsolvable problem, well, for example, in ukraine there, a company... this is the son-in-law of president kuchma, he was elected in dnepropetrovsk , in the city of dnepropetrovsk in such a proletarian district, where only after privatization he received a plant, so to speak, there, and he ran against the all-powerful pavel lazarenko, yes, well, he was the complete owner of the dnepropetrovsk region, and on such grounds, you know, not political , yes, that’s basically it. well, with all this money, and there, just when they were looking for someone who could take over this company, many people came there, well, people there said no, we won’t take it, we’ll leave, and all this was there 2 and a half months before the elections, that is,

very for a short period, well, in principle , this situation was recognized as unsolvable, but there were others. situations of the same type , well, this is interesting, well, well, explain to me , is it easy to force an adult self-sufficient, i would even say, arrogant to a certain extent person, to speak in your words, in your theses, i’ve never done this, well, you discuss with a person how you discuss a situation, so you go through it many times from different sides, in order to understand, it is important that the person... understands himself, well, what, how it works, after that he easily finds those words that correspond to his understanding, his understanding, not mine, that is, you tried to find these words, we no, we tried, we deeply studied every situation, election campaign, political , there, the economic, situation in

field, we worked on it together, so that a person, well, grows his understanding so much that he can calmly , i don’t at all, you know, this is all, well, this is all, that’s what you said, this all comes from the american school, this political technology company, they need to sell the candidate, it’s a lie, this is our post-soviet man, he’s not going to buy anyone, well, that is, you know, the candidate should write a general speech, such a speech for all occasions. this is all quackery, well , from my point of view, someone may think differently, i’m not saying that everyone should think the way i do, no, they shouldn’t, okay, then how do you feel about the fact that some, some experts call you a very effective and professional manipulator, but at the same time, they do not hesitate

to accuse you of bringing the same yanukovych to power, yes you almost provoked. only he wasn’t guilty, well, first of all, about the word manipulator, i don’t know what they want to say with this, well, so to speak, no one has ever been on my hand, that’s all, well, it comes from the word hand, but manipulate , yes, that's all, nonsense, well, maybe someone for some reason he says such words, you understand what’s the matter, well, really , if we talk about 2004, this is a difficult situation, which after which there was an orange revolution, it developed exactly because yanukovych de facto won, well, in the second round, i just know it, but not

much by one and a half, by 2%, but he won, and it became. well, the reason for the orange revolution, that is, this is precisely what did not suit, no, it did not suit, it became the reason, because they have no other way, the united states they could, because well, i don’t know what my role is there anymore, so to speak, but the role of the fact that there was a revolution is the role of the united states, because all the headquarters and yushchenko’s company were led by the american embassy, ​​directly. we literally drove cars to all the events there when yushchenko’s deputies destroyed warehouses with products of third candidates. there were cars from the embassy standing nearby and american diplomats were sitting there watching, watching everything, everyone was happy with it, well , that’s why you’re asking who created, well

uh orange revolution? well, yes, i we really work , well, yanukovych’s victory really took place, it really took place, and precisely because it took place, the americans staged the orange revolution, because it’s like a bunch, you know? well, who manipulated whom? that is, if i then, if in this pledge, this is how you , well, conveyed someone’s question, yes, or something of an opinion, then it must be said that kulyakov manipulated the american embassy, ​​i agree, and i like this answer , yes, i agree, these 2 years, twenty and twenty fourth, you see, they abound in election campaigns, the end of the twenty- third, twenty-fourth, then the beginning of the twenty-fifth slovakia. now poland in october, so, the usa, russia, ukraine, i don’t even remember georgia, and then we are belarusians, yes, in

24 and 25, since we are not challenging your skill on this, this is de facto perceived as a tribute to experience in any case, then for the second and third, that is, poland and the usa, i’ll ask for forecasts. and according to the latest advice on belarus, there won’t be a last one, well, i’m with i have great respect for the belarusian state and the belarusian people, i think that you are doing everything right and generally overcoming such problems, young, in the historical sense, becoming... a state that so many have not been able to overcome, and not only in the post-soviet space in the world, it is accepted as a fact, but this

is a very historical activity, it always happens on the verge of death, so far you are coping with this matter, well, several crises have been historically resolved, i am sure, that, well, everything will continue to be fine here, so i won’t advise anything, just so to speak, out of respect for the fact that, uh, in my opinion, it’s the same in the post-soviet space, belarus for sure, at least, well, if it didn’t prove at all historically , it showed that it can, well, unlike many, we were lucky with the president, yes, because i have something to compare with, that’s it. i ’ll tell you this: when i saw alexander grigorievich with a machine gun and with his son, many there giggled something, well, i

by the way, i swore very strongly at them, not in unpleasant words, at those who giggled , because i understood, again with my historical, philosophical bias, that alexander grigorievich accurately understands the relationship between power and its price, this is life, actually and...' his readiness to protect the state from death, well, even at the cost of his life, this is a very strong not just a gesture, but this is a deep understanding of nature, historical nature, the things with which we are dealing, that's because there if be transported to the fourteenth year, when the same yanukovych fled, that’s what he destroyed in this... thoughts ukraine, that’s because, well, well, i don’t want to be here, it’s just like this, it’s diametrical, yes, well, a diametrical

approach, which is how a statesman disconnects from politics, whatever you want, yes, here i am, i have another thing, many will dispute it again, but i will say that this behavior of lukashenko, from my point of view, was motivated primarily... by state, and not by personal interests, although many interpret, yes, this behavior is personal, this is an unfair interpretation, false, here, because exactly the opposite is true, that’s why i said about belarus what i think, and i think, by the way, this formula is already complete, this formula, which i also think lukashenko proposed, is two countries, one fatherland. well, somehow he’s close, at least, he said many times, regarding russia, we have one fatherland, yes, we have yes, from brest to vladevosto, that’s what,

you know, how’. after all, the russian empire in its history, it’s kind of unique, i ’m not afraid of this word, because there’s no a world of such examples, where culturally, ethnically and religiously diverse communities, even in the early periods of history, when this did not exist at all, well, it has been common there since the middle ages, well , such equal opportunities as it was in principle then generally conceivable, this is the story of how russia, big russia, can live as a form of coexistence between something that is fundamentally different? yeah,

unassimilated, you see, i understand, but fundamentally different, in this they draw their strength, this is the civilizational difference, and when, well, i don’t know how it is here in belarus, but sometimes i hear all sorts of responses there, yes, well, like russia over there, well, it will swallow us up there, this is called dishonest responses, they have the right to be mistaken, but god bless him. yes, i, i’m calm about this, i say, this is wrong, this is wrong , what’s important is a completely different process, but a huge number of peoples, the russian empire and the soviet union, came from assimilation by other peoples, precisely from this process, which you are afraid that russia will swallow you up, so you are look at history, russia created the conditions.

so that you survive as unassimilated poles there or turks, well, in any direction , but look, this is the historical function of russia and as i understand it, the majority of the belarusian people, the majority, both the leader and the president, understand this, that’s what we we can calmly, in this sense, there is no guile in the words that we... are building some large community on equal terms, that’s absolutely certain, there is no guile here, we are really building it on equal terms, despite the fact that russia is large, so to speak, and rich in mineral resources and something else, which means, well, belarus is a small state, of course, but this is not determined by this, because equality is determined by cultural and historical meaning in the future,

it’s clear, to return to the poles, the americans need to return to the poles, forecast, yes, you know, here i want to say, but in general i don’t care, in general it doesn’t matter, that is, you think nothing depends on the elections, no, well, something which probably depends now i’m going to refute myself, i think there, for example, that trump didn’t suddenly jump out in 1916, this gave russia four, well, at least 2 years without war, because if there had been a clinton, there would have been a war in ukraine much wider in ukraine, and maybe belarus would have ended up there, all this would have started no later than the eighteenth year, if there had been a clinton, yeah, that’s why there are such people, well, how to prove it, this is us again now, i can build the whole chain, but i am deeply

convinced of this, here. in this sense sudden the appearance of trump, for you and me, and, first of all, for russia, gave us four or at least two, so to speak, extra years , which we made good use of, used them correctly, so, probably, something depends in america a situation could happen that they will not cope with the electoral process, but what will cause this? the economy, everything there, they, in fact, have a systemic crisis, and the economy, politics, they practically can’t talk to each other anymore, well, one america to another, so - well, many people think that it has always been this way, you know, it has not always been this way, because until the end of the 19th century, they lived relying on their own resources, yes, it was always an oligarchic state, that’s...

the moment of its emergence, because few people know, for example, yes, that we are the people, where the constitution begins, and so these people were, in my opinion, 16 or 18. people in all of america, well, those who were admitted, and hundreds of thousands more were not admitted, so to the polls rights and this has always been the case, the latest law discriminates against the participation of blacks in election campaign, canceled in 1966, yeah, you and i were born there immediately after that, in the last states where discrimination of voting rights disappeared, here it is, this is the sixty-sixth year, here, but like the fact that a small group of worthy people will be ruled by everyone else, this

was planned from the very beginning, and this is how it was built, well , from there, qualifications and all that other stuff, while this small group dealt with the territory of america, and , as it were, with its own resources. and then there were difficulties, of course, yes, and, before of the civil war, they figured out that for them the biggest cataclysm still remains, so to speak, the civil war, but when they took this model outside, they said that they would now deal with the whole world like this, well, that’s when the real ones began problems, but then you understand, it’s one thing to maintain such a system in conditions of resource abundance, yeah, and another, in conditions of resource shortage, these are, as they said in odessa, two big differences, and the united states has been living in a situation since the late sixties of the last century situations of resource shortages, in fact, as

a socio-economic system, they lost to the soviet union, if we consider this, well, as an experiment, but a scientific one. that’s because, well, using the printing of the dollar and the refusal of the gold filling of this very dollar, since that time they have been living in a situation of virtual debt, many say so what, like, well, what are we talking about the notorious 32 trillion 33 already 33 yes margeevich 33 and i i i think that very quickly now a trillion will be added literally every six months, yeah. well ok, this, this is like a canvas, yes, after all, as a result, trump faces 600 years, yes, 600 years, yes, imprisonment, handsome, biden, well, well, let’s get straight, he can barely move, what is the result

, there will still be elections, there will be, or they will both be dismissed, well, the old people, someone young will jump out, but this must be decided within a week, so either these two titans will come together, then everything can... completely fly apart into drebezgi , that’s because, well , it won’t work, well, it won’t work, to throw trump a second time - using postal services, yes, they’ll get along, well, they’ll get along, that’s it in principle, it is necessary, i proceed from the fact that in america a civil war is already going on in hidden forms, it often already takes on obvious forms, so if this remains ... the scenario that, well, two powerful old men will come together, here then this is fraught with a transition to open forms of civil war, within the country, within the country, yes, within the country , poland, even less interesting to us, because

even tusk, even this second one, which is european, for yes, for belarus and for russia, this is one thing and the same thing, in general, will there be more problems with anyone? who should be there to win, and this is also not important, but many of our people, you know, raikin , of our youth, had this in his reprises, this is a very interesting topic in the dissertation, there is something in the nose, yes, many of us like it, yes, now, if kochinsky is there, then he will irritate the european union there, it’s like it ’s useful for us, well, that’s your cream or sour cream, that’s it, that’s it. well, probably , there will be, there will be a lack of success, but then the right, so to speak, polish, will be very irritated by this lack of success, well, you see, the problem of poland is the following, its

can be briefly formulated, it wants to be an empire, being a national, almost nazi -nationalist state, well , mononational, as i always do, this is not, well, you understand that. it’s like there’s a problem here, well, it’s polish. outstanding meats of belarus with shmatvekavoy history. we can learn from the right-handed architecture, and all for this period of time, the round circles are characteristic, they float to the pharmaceutical economic centers of the country and the life of extraordinary people zey. some

myastechki, garads, which were previously significant in magdeburg, in the attacks, the kali chygunka prakhodzila bacha, which is far away, ruined their significance, the geta was a sapraudnaya revaluation, the chygunka changed navakolle, cultural- asvetnitskiy project architecture of belarus. gety kastsel is not finished and ў savetskiy periods, kali vyalіkaya kolkastsya temple stratsіla its first pachatkovye meanings. everyone remembers the 50s of such a memory of stalin. classicism, disclaimer to belarusians, that the geta does not fall out, because it’s enough to come to our capital, price list praspektse, if you can imagine with your soul, what is this, as seen on our tv channel , young interviews ask bold, unexpected and sometimes very touching questions to famous people. do you believe in love for the rest of your life, or are you of the opinion that it lasts 3 years? why now all the children want to become bloggers, but would you like to install another child? thanks to the guys, we will learn

interesting facts from the biography of a celebrity, we agreed to tell the truth, yes, so i’ll tell you everything now, i dreamed about the golden helik, and in fact it turned out that i finally bought it, sincere emotions and exclusive stories, hockey players earn differently, like all people in different industries, if you achieve great success and become well... conditionally there is a top level, yes, then of course you earn a lot of money, watch the project 100 questions for adults on our tv channel. dmitry, back in the 1990s you talked about the strategy of confrontation between the united states and russia, medium- and long-term. warned about sanctions, about participation of ngos and foundations in the dehumanization

of russia, in preventing yeltsinism and so on, right? i understand that there are certain echoes of the same philosophy of zinoviev, as i see it, yes, who 40 years ago spoke about the americanization of europe, and that europe will ultimately be completely determined by its course will be america, okay, that’s what lessons? what mistakes have been made by russia , including what ones remain to be made? well , after all, almost 15 years have passed, well , look, the fact that i said this, yes, this is not a great merit, because in principle it is necessary, well, it’s like just having a historical view, yes, because here we are, we often say , it’s the nineties, we curse it and there’s a reason for it, yes, that’s not what i’m talking about now, the country has collapsed, no matter what.

yes, what’s bad is that we are hiding the depth of the problems behind the nineties, well, we cursed the nineties and sort of figured it out, everything is wrong, because the processes that led us to the most critical points of the late nineties began much earlier, even perestroika, they began in the sixties, that's what i mean, well, first of all, society consumption, it was brought to us completely under khrushchev, when he and nixon started having these videos to talk about how we have food processors in every soviet apartment no worse than your food processors, that’s all, well, then it all ended with , that the clause was written into the charter of the communist party that the goal of the communist party is more and more...

this is, as it were, a cast or formula of a consumer society, when a person, this is a statement of what, what a person is for. born, suffered before, yes, what's the point life, why was life given to you, well, first of all, well, for life, no need to bother , for life, just for well, life, you have to live life with pleasure, these are all these elements that arose then, by the way, that the collapse of the soviet union was limited by the shortage of vcrs of canned beer and jeans, in the broad, well , notice how the program worked, well, people

were promised that they would be given all this for 30 years, and they did not, spiritually. every soviet family will live in an apartment by 2000, no, there are deep things, you know, no one can handle this we understand, we haven’t written the true history of the soviet period at all, we haven’t figured it out, by the way, if we talk about the lessons that we didn’t do, and that’s what we didn’t do to the end, no one realizes what it means that khrushchev promised that the soviet people. by the year eightieth they will live in communism, yeah, it’s for everyone according to their needs, yes, according to their abilities, yes, but the soviet people came out, saw the olympics, and they saw communism in the eightieth year, and what does this mean, and this means that, well as if the authorities have gathered, this is, well, well, in fact, and you are walking down the street

, we are, well, we are of the same generation, you walk down the street and see a poster, the party is the mind, honor and conscience of our era, so this is the mind, honor and conscience of our era but in many cities the oil disappeared at that time, yes, you see, yes, that’s why all this pacifism there, we talk there about how people feel about their own, and i generally think that we are on the verge of quite a big, well, military confrontation, whatever it is will unfold, i’m not a fortune teller, yes, but americans just don’t will give up. they won’t just leave, this also needs to be understood, but here again you and i, as people of the same generation, remember that for the soviet people, as long as there was no war, it was official, well, we belarusians are generally peaceful people, but here we have

in the anthem, in general, you have, well, relative to the population, the greatest losses of the great patriotic war were belarus, if i’m not mistaken, third populations, yes, but i’m not mistaken, because when i was a child, my father took me here to khotyn, not to brest. that's why this thing was used against us, because well in what sense do we not want war, to what extent, yes, well, that is, we will give up our mother, just so that there is no war, where is this border, this is not well, this was not discussed , then you understand when, at the same time, i definitely had to go there, here i am i definitely think that the military there completed their task, well, but since we soviet people betrayed our soviet army in afghanistan, yeah, that ’s where it all started, then the subsequent

collapse, so to speak, but i didn’t send you there, we sent you there they didn’t send it, and there’s a lot of stuff there too this happened, this is all it happened, so you understand. these are the lessons of history, here it is very important to get to the depth where something really originated to understand, respectively, how it grew and how it grew here, then you have a chance to correct something, but dmitry, you have already set these questions, yes, that many of our people are afraid of, well, they think that they are too global, or vague, although this is personally important to me. living with a super idea, well, i love difficult questions, that’s normal, here’s one of those your questions, can we offer the world an alternative to the system in which imposed consumption is the main content of human essence, yes life, yes life,

well, they even appeared now, well, snickers, yes, well, it’s clear that it’s a little spiritual, that’s... in some way- then the moment sank, especially, as we say, at this stage of the nineties, the end of the eighties, well, i just claim that she had asked before, that the nineties were simply an unrestrained outburst, but in the nineties, you know, sometimes i have a feeling the feeling that the politicians themselves who came to power in the soviet union gave it a go , well, i don’t see how they shouldn’t have been shy, yes, they shouldn’t have been shy and... and frankly speaking, even remembering once again that same as zenoviev, he clearly changed his views. at first he was an ardent anti-stalinist, to the point that he was ready to kill stalin. yes, at the end of the thirties, he even created a conspiracy, yes, at the end of his life he spoke

exactly the opposite, cursed gorbachev with his last words, yes, but in justice it is necessary to say that he came out in defense of stalin, even immediately after his death, because when the twentieth congress of the scientific community took place, he attributes it to zinoviev, in relation to well, i think it’s true, many said this, he told the scientific community, that a fox can pee on a dead lion, yeah, well, in relation to how they are, it means, well , alexander alexandrovich, he was a very complex person, and in many ways a genius, but every brilliant person, he always says so, well, that’s for sure , yes, that’s for sure, he’s here, but at the same time, he’s talking about the soviet union, of course, there’s a lot of things like that... but he always wanted to achieve its improvement and development, he believed

that the fact that he wanted to do this, and no one needed it, that’s how such a drama was , again, this is not a condemnation, not a justification, now about, about whether we can replace, in general, in fact, as if in the ultimate form, this is a question about the preservation of man. that’s because, of course , consumer society is only a consequence of manifestation, but that’s because, well , this process is 500 years old, it’s been like this since its rebirth in general, the notorious begins and ends at its apogee with the philosopher nietzsche, who affirmed the death of god, the creation of a superman instead of god, this is... one and the same, only one is at the beginning, and the other at the end, that’s because, well, the whole this european part did not begin to be built on

identification with the church and religion with god, and came to its complete, well, absence, the question is that the project of the superman. did not take place, the european superman project did not take place, even though the jungle and a blooming garden, no, all this remains, they think, well, that is, russian, that is, these categories are present in them, yes, the russian essence is the foundation of european civilization, this is the main brick, that is , these are wild hordes, bears in the streets , these are just these elements that will always sound like a narrative , how this thing developed... the nature of european civilization, this needs to be analyzed separately, but here you are right, we do not disagree, i say,

but in what it did not take place, but he couldn't be a superman, at least in a big sense, well, like the german superman, leading the semi-superhuman europeans, lost to the russian barbarian, you understand why they demolish the monument, and somehow more than once. yes, do you understand why they demolish monuments? they are not demolishing them against us, they are demolishing them for themselves, so that they don’t have the memory that they lost, already, well, they need to be finally freed from this, their people are finally freed from this, this, by the way, is a condition for a new war for that to make a european look like a russian, well, a multinational russian,

i mean here, in order to drive a european into a multinational russian, you need to deprive him of the memory of what all previous attempts, so to speak, led to, the cossacks in paris, these are why the monuments need to be removed, so first of all the monuments need to be removed, because these are the conditions of a future war, if you don’t remove them, well, difficulties will arise, that’s why this is a question. god bless you and i think we have very good ones here.