[000:00:00;00] the united states of america, and the third point is the strongest israeli lobby in the united states, which introduced neither one nor the other sanctions, and not only against arab opponents there, including against the ussr , it also introduced sanctions that no one has lifted, here a whole conglomerate, another moment, another level, if we move away from the internal agenda, this is the level... who calls the tune, the same arab states and territories , the same palestinians, in principle understood this, now the situation is changing, new centers of power are emerging, that iran, for example, which used to be

the americans. not the western part of the world community, he has entered the shanghai cooperation organization, he is on the path to brix, he is a strategic partner of the people's republic of china, he is today maximally intensifying relations with the russian federation, the north-south corridor. that new centers of power, the same saudi arabia , which used to be a hard satellite of the united states, today is a strategic partner of china, works with india, with latin america, with the russian federation, not submitted to the sanctions, yes, to the sanctions regime, it also plays its game, moreover, it would seem that the same hamas was supported by kator, an ally of the united

states, america, and i think that the pinnacle of the struggle over all this is the struggle for control over the territories , which could potentially become part of either the great silk road, the chinese modern, or the second moment of the indian trade route, which delhi announced that it would build from the eastern mediterranean, look, but still there are a few facts that i i want you to comment, yes, because it raises questions , after all, who benefited from this aggravation, because it turns out, on the one hand, it is obvious that the israeli army overslept, this attack, yes, in general, the footage that they show us,

when in reality the soldiers of the israeli army are taken by surprise at fortified bases, they, to put it mildly, do not offer resistance , they are destroyed, literally, which suggests that in principle it was sudden, obviously, many say, experts, that it could not have happened without betrayal or without any, well, softly speaking of moves from the inside, this is the first question, the second question, you say that for the united states this is really aggravated. so for biden on the eve of the elections this aggravation will bring points or costs, let’s summarize a little, it will at least change the agenda, and if we are talking about the reaction of the israeli state in general, it seems to me that very good sabotage and conspiracy agents worked there,

why because on the border gases and there is a wall with an alarm, which turned out to be disabled, in order to turn it off, you need to have it access, which means that there are currently agents inside the israeli state itself, that’s another question , but let’s look at what has happened to the israeli state over the past 3 years, an internal crisis, constant speeches, rallies, well, we talked about disunity, disunity which means that the internal political confrontation today has begun to play into the hands of the foreign political confrontation, because neither the intelligence services, nor the army intelligence, counterintelligence, they did not work, they did not were able to prevent or at least warn, they themselves say that such

seizures have never happened in history. this is one point, the second point is the unity of the arab world in this situation, that is, here i see that there is a benefit in the redistribution for many, for a huge number of players, and for the united states of america, to prevent the strengthening of china, india, iran , the same thing, and for iran, which wants to demonstrate, firstly, wants to take revenge for what was done to it last year, it is clear which special services, some drones. poisoning in schools, attempts to undermine society on ethnic grounds, on gender grounds, this and discontent in lebanon , we just don’t notice it, we don’t live

by the theme, but lebanon is simply shaken by internal conflicts, and this is hezbollah, these are those who oppose israel , and this again is the question of who owns the dutch heights. yeah, this is syria, which has received blows from israel more than once, and which is dissatisfied with the situation that israel expresses in relation to them, and this is a very multi-layered cake, but look, if this linkage between the usa and ukraine is completed, in our conversation, yes, the usa is obviously losing the role of such a global hegemon, it is losing, yes, but at the same time they really want to preserve it, they continue to throw around billions at least in words, yes, while the project of the american budget without assistance to ukraine, well, at least in the amount that ukraine would like, and this was very surprising, or at least, alerted not only zelsky, but even

barel, so in your opinion, what kind of bargaining is this in relation to biden is leading ukraine, is it connected? it’s only with this 30% that they really lost in a year and a half, well, if we take 10 there... the number of people willing to help ukraine decreases every six months, is this only connected with this? here, in my opinion, an important role is played by the fact that the ukrainian direction, no matter how it is put forward, is not strategic for the united states, the united states does not need a pro-american ukraine, as many may think, the united states, and we know the history with afghanistan, with vietnam in the very

show'. pay all the debts there of ukraine, its budgetary costs, and why did europe fit in so well, despite its own interests, and europe’s interest was a good relationship with russia and china, the americans played a proactive role, they are today forcing european businesses to move their production from europe to the united states of america. according to german social studies , which were carried out just a year ago , and then a year ago, 25% of large companies in germany had already withdrawn their

enterprises from the territory of the european union, and 51 were thinking about it and planning it to do, that is, by and large, a weak europe, europe’s dependence on the united states, this is the main interest, europe as a periphery. use those intellectual, economic, financial, technological resources of europe to strengthen the united states in the most powerful, most powerful struggle with china, that is , concentrate the resources of europe at home, take them to yourself, turn europe into a mere periphery, entertainment for tourists, but come and see everything, that is, lack of independence. bloomberg writes that with this decision, well, at least with a statement

about such a decision, yes, a serious blow has been dealt to zelensky, here the hungarians and slovaks are throwing gunpowder, yes, although more precisely, they do not want to push it, declaring that they will not give a single cartridge to zelensky, in slovakia the party that is extremely critical. attitude towards ukraine, all this, frankly speaking, resembles such a scheme, yes, when initially there is a loud statement , we will support it, yes, and then you are left alone, this is the stage of fatigue in your opinion among european mourners, but here is the topic ukraine. for europe, in fact, this is an ideologically important topic of the image of the enemy, which is molding from russia, from belarus, such a border, in order to keep

europe in crisis until ukraine. in the european union, there were elections to the bundestag when this traffic light coalition was formed. yeah, in this election the people's parties, the cdu, the csu and the sdp, together won about 50% of the votes, and they were told why. they always together gained at least a constitutional majority, that is, there is no trust in the systemic political forces, in those social institutions that exist, in order to somehow unite society , it is best to pay, if there is nothing to sell them , the image of the enemy and fear are just there, this is done, therefore europe, or rather their

elites, do not think about european interests, they think about euro-atlantic interests, their home is a plane, between brussels and washington, they are not interested in europe in this regard, their accounts are in transnational banks, they receive their interest, and they don’t care whether the german grandmother receives one pension, or we give her part of her pension some military funds and services there, they are not interested in this, but there is another tendency, you noticed about slovakia, and this is only the first elections, and i want to emphasize the curious point that such a special opinion exists and prevails in the societies of the former austro

-hungary, yeah, from the very first day she was very critical of this whole ukrainian topic , we see a sharp change in opinion in slovakia, soon there will be the czech republic, soon there will be austria, and austria initially was quite restrained, yes, it was quite restrained, and now there will be even more criticism, a pragmatic core will gradually be built within the european union, which... understands that we are losing funds, we are losing our subjectivity, due to the fact that some, some part of the european bureaucracy is simply because of its own benefit, it fit into this topic of ukraine, okay, then the question is simple , now let’s simulate the situation, the united states loses interest in ukraine completely if it switches to the middle east, yes, pushes this problem exclusively onto europe, for how long. europe will

to deal with the problem of ukraine, even taking into account, as you said, the need to have a common enemy, as a means of escaping from one’s own social cataclysms, well, this is a rather idealistic option, i think the united states will not completely merge ukraine , however, their main task is this is a war of attrition, the europeans will be charged as much as possible for all military costs and expenses. that we are already in principle, so that they continue to weaken the russian bear, roughly speaking, and themselves as well, and themselves, as far as they they will be able to do this for a long time, they also have a printing press called euro, and there is a european bank for reconstruction and development, it is clear that european taxpayers will pay for this, plus, we must not forget such a monster as the eastern

partner. and other types of association with the eu, by and large, systems of financial and economic colonization by the european union of other states , that’s what, this is northern africa, these are some countries of latin america, this is the same moldova, georgia, azerbaijan, that is, enough certain candidates, donors, cheap labor, how much. it will be a long time, a difficult question, it must be calculated, but i think that they are ready to play until 2028 for sure, why the twenty-eighth? because there will be the next us elections. good answer. when we talk about europe’s readiness to continue working to exhaust russia, this

automatically implies that belarus is working in conjunction with russia, they will work against us, naturally. but the president’s visit to a fortified area of ​​one of... and a conversation about a number of important topics. we have long been accustomed to the fact that our first, he not only understands and is well versed in the internal external agenda, yes, we often see that his words are prophetic in nature. and the president’s warnings, especially those addressed to our ardent western partners, yes, should be heeded, and heeded literally. so let's start with the obvious. here is the situation at the borders, yes, we have learned the lessons of history, the lessons of modern warfare, this was discussed, we are ready to cause unacceptable damage in the event of an attack, that’s what’s behind it it stands, once again, for our viewers, in simple words, in simple words, that we

will never retreat and will not give up five of our lands to anyone, this is the first point, the second point is that our state is following the path of dialogue and not monologue , let me remember with the same poles, yes, when we proposed to conduct joint exercises, and how they fidgeted, and then suddenly two high-ranking officials of the ministry of defense signed a letter of resignation, here we must realize some things. that the modern militaristic bacchanalia of poland it has two two components: the first component is the election one, the image of the enemy, transporting various kinds of armored vehicles throughout poland and demonstrating them to frighten

the population, but without any need, except for political technology, the second point is something that for some reason they don’t talk about much in our country , this is... an attempt by the party of law and justice to subjugate the army, yeah, to establish a partyocracy, this is a completely special phenomenon, if we talk about poland, which probably does not exist anywhere else, when the party first crushed under itself the main economic, production, industrial concerns, that is, it is the party, not the power party, it is peace that arranges its people. to the board of directors of orlina, to the board of directors of the group dung, kgm, copper - this is the largest concern, the leading strategic concerns of poland, this is the first moment, now they are already doing this in the army and using the army for their political purposes, we are in this situation, that’s when the president

says: we are ready for dialogue, we do not act as a reaction to something, of course, this annoys them, why, because they are trying to violate borders, fly in, fly over their own helicopters, to induce some kind of hysterical reaction, which they would use in their information affairs, things, political technologies, to show that the belarusians, you see, are aggressive, for us they are a source of aggression and a source of danger, it is impossible to act like this, we are not grist for their mill, our grist, this is the first point, the second point, i still disagree with some experts who say that the americans are aiming for some kind of military escalation, why in our region, in

in our region specifically, there are different forces in the west , there are forces that, on the contrary, are pushing, but i personally get the feeling that very strongly... such a force is present in the uk, well, these always want to use the wrong hands, for whom it is more profitable for them to escalate as much as possible, but the americans the nato summit in vilnius made a very clear point and promoted the thesis that nato countries should not be involved in direct confrontation with countries that have nuclear weapons and b that have nuclear weapons on their territory. this is hello to those who said that it was tactical nuclear weapons do not work in belarus, they just started working, initially these statements contradicted logic, not a single nuclear country has... if we look at how sharply

the poles began to change their tactics towards us, instead of installing offensive contingents on borders, they began to actually mine the suwalki corridor, that is, the logic of the maginot line, the defensive presence, that is. changes in tactics and strategists, it is clear that this is all being done from a political technology point of view, it seems to me, a demonstration, yes, demonstration, but on the other hand, the poles want to sell their service, this is their fix idea among their intellectuals, as the main force, the united states of america, as a trojan horse within the european union, which should... berlin, brussels and paris,

and b must carry such a mission of light, in quotes, of course, to the east, such missionism, the americans also have a dual attitude towards this, there is a polish lobby, it is quite strong, which really promotes militarization, the sale of weapons, but the sale of weapons is one thing, a management of the american contingent in europe, who, the poles want to arrange their deployment on the territory of their state, they have failed in this , the americans have two main complaints here, why do we need to transfer the entire infrastructure from germany to poland when it has already been built since the cold war war, there are nuclear weapons, the second point is that the americans do not have any confidence in the fact that poland is a predicted state, here is an example of the

same grain conflict with ukraine, yes, yeah, because this embargo was not introduced 15 september, and not in the summer, it was introduced back in march of this year, but for some reason no one then penalized this topic informationally, in july everyone knew that this agricultural coalition, which warsaw built against the kiev regime, yes, and their grains that they will extend this is an embargo, but the hysteria all began after september 15, when the extension deadlines passed, and when everything became clear what it would be, well , this became such a basis for a big quarrel, this confrontation between poland and ukraine, right? and which began because of grain, at least in the public space, but from this conflict, can we say that the confrontation will increase, namely

between poland and ukraine, is this already an escalation or a negative situation, but developing in dynamics, and let's look at the reasons why zelensky this confrontation, especially the public, theatrical one, is beneficial, why is it beneficial for duda and morovetsky? this is what zelensky is doing, the topic of ukraine is gradually disappearing, it is becoming uninteresting, they want to pull it out of the public sphere, abandon it, what it turns out here, the second point, blinkin states that you will not receive help, and this is before all the budget agreements are made, until you carry out the appropriate ones.

reforms and do not start anti-corruption actions, i will remind you that in ukraine there is such a unit as the national anti-corruption bureau of ukraine , nabu, which actually acts as an organ of the united states of america inside ukraine, which carries out personnel policy, controls personnel, who decides who is a corrupt official, who is not a corrupt official? the americans' task is to strengthen this body and actually reduce that kiev regime, which has a completely puppet state, a completely puppet state, in response, that in response they see that zelensky ’s gaze on him is decreasing, the help is about to disappear from under his feet, well, it’s already decreasing, they are already

speaking directly. this is a ukrainian case, understandable, but in poland, the ratings of the law and justice party, to put it mildly, are not great, at the beginning of june 30%, against the backdrop of bacchanalia and the creation of an enemy image from belarus and russia, they slightly increased to 40, well, corrupt scandal, but then not just corruption, this visa scandal, visa corruption. a scandal, yes, which was inspired by brussels, berlin and paris, they leaked this information and promoted it in the media, it reduced ratings to 32%, and an anti-ukrainian theme was included, which is becoming more and more popular due to the behavior of the ukrainians themselves in poland, and behavior and the

way duda and morowiecki allocated aid from the state budget to the ukrainian one. interests of farmers, small-scale farm production in in poland, there are a lot of farmers, this is a large layer of the electorate, yeah, they are starting to raise anti-ukrainian themes, show hysteria that look, yes, maybe we didn’t really notice the seventieth anniversary of the volyn massacre and swallowed it, but now we ’ll show them to you, we we will firmly defend our polish national interests there, okay , peter, then it’s a provocative question, it’s simple, yes, but why should dudi declare against the backdrop of the events that began in israel, yes, that they say there is no need to exaggerate the significance too much the arab-israeli conflict, yes, that is, it has always been, yes, it has always been , here, after all, there is still ukraine, well, let’s just say for a politician of this level, a week before the elections, such statements, where are the positions of peace and so weak, yes, well, it looks a little strange or illogical, or

is there a logic somewhere, here is a simple logic, duda doesn’t want... to lose the infrastructure and the role that poland has in supporting the kiev regime, first of all such as military infrastructure, logistics infrastructure, the rzeszewo airfield is today a huge logistics hub, where both the transshipment of relevant cargo and weapons to ukraine is carried out, and on the other hand, the repair of equipment that comes from ukraine is carried out. in any case, this is income, and duda simply says: don’t forget about us, finance the projects that are taking place, and do n’t exaggerate the israeli conflict, you don’t need to invest any more money there, you invest money for us, that is, this is not even a message to ukraine, not to its own citizens, this is a message from washington, good, but still here are the elections

literally this week, yes, insider. from our president: polish diplomats are ready to improve relations, but we belarusians are ready for all scenarios, so what is your forecast for the prospects for the development of the polish situation, i mean the outcome of the elections, and the situation after these very elections, where will poland move? well , i would highlight three basic scenarios: the first scenario is understandable, this is if the code saves. someone will take power, either independently or in a coalition, in this scenario, after the elections, parliamentary and presidential, the rhetoric will become a little softer, the second moment, i think that then there will be some cutting off , at least in the chinese direction, and this means that they will not close the border, uh, why,

because 90% of the transit of the northern part... the belt and roads to hamburg pass through the territory belarus and poland, respectively poland, yes, this is the first point, although they will try to sell their military services, and we also all know what to expect from them. the second scenario is the opposite scenario, tusk, the company, pro-european, as politicians call them, although i would bet here the question is how pro-european they are already. because, for example, the us ambassador in warsaw, mark brzezinski, the son of the famous brzezinski, supports tusk and the opposition with his feet and hands, attends rallies, here, on the one hand, we will have to see less hysteria and more

discipline in poland, perhaps a retreat in relation to to europe, disciplined. including in relation to euro-atlantic solidarity, why? because, berlin, today it is not completely independent, today it is pursuing an anti-german policy towards your savings. and these local elections show that they can expect him to pursue a more sovereign policy in the polish direction than poland itself or the european union is not worth, what is important here , the important thing is that on the one hand there will be some demilitarization of the region, many projects will be frozen for rearmament, or reduced. but on the other hand, poland will be more disciplined within the framework of this euro-atlantic solidarity. yes, berlin will be watching the americans,

warsaw will be subordinate to it, but we must another point to understand is that tusk will bring to our western border not only a geopolitical, but also a value-based border. yes. these are all non-traditional values, their propaganda. because of the bug, it will come from the polish direction, but for now, between peace , for example, and brussels, peace and washington, there are contradictions on this score, and these contradictions are not beneficial, okay, the third scenario, the third scenario, here are the latest polls, which were given by sociological services, they say that none of the parties will be able to create a coalition, and this is the scenario parliamentary crisis in poland, when it will be necessary to do... re-elections, and poland will be mired, well, actually until the presidential elections, if not further, these are the leapfrogs of the electoral process, on the one hand

there will be a lot of statements, shouting, uproar, uh- huh, on the other hand , a technical government, the suspension of the stability of the polish government itself, it will push foreign policy issues into the background, that is... for us this will be a certain respite to the fact that we will be left a little alone for a while, this is for us it’s beneficial, in fact, why, because unfortunately, the polish elites themselves have driven themselves into the mousetrap of this discourse around the image of the enemy, they themselves have swallowed the hook that they threw to their voters and cannot swim out of it. ok, then let’s return to my original question, a small remark, would you dare to make a forecast on the election results? which of these three scenarios will work? in your opinion? maybe many people won’t like this script, i think

that the first script, piss, because they political strategists demonstrate grace, uh, they can contrive to get away with it, so far it turns out, unfortunately, or fortunately so. we better prepare for this scenario, although we should not discard other scenarios, why? because the electorate of peace is disciplined, it goes to the polls, unlike the opposition electorate, this is the electorate of pensioners, this is the electorate of residents of small medium-sized cities, and these are believers, so they are the first to come to the polling stations, everyone else is on a residual principle, then there is a church that is financed by the state, including the state, yes, salaries are paid to the priests of the state, it will also play its role in this, of course, calling on people to come and vote, of course, but i’m still like

a person who understands the other side of the coin, the polish people, at least, that they are slavs, that the anglo-saxon spirit is alien to them, yeah, i hope that in polish society, sooner or... later sobering up will begin, i think it’s rather early, why, because those negative economic and social dynamics that there, it will force, at a minimum, polish society to transform towards dialogue and the search for alternatives, if today poland actually has a choice between the formation of this pisov partocracy, yeah, and the formation of how poland will fit in, get used to the new multipolar world, so one, their political strategist said, either poland will pursue a one-vector

policy, or it will still manage and take, for example, the same experience of hungary and begin to be friends with china, with russia and the arab states, a multi-vector policy for poland is polish national... which is dictated by its geography, it will be interesting, as for the taftology, forgive me, how will it fit in, but for this multi-vector, look, if we are talking about poland. we devoted a lot of time to it, of course, and the elections in poland, but there are still a huge number of, let’s say, those, yes, that are not only closer and more interesting to us, yes, but they have a certain impact on, let’s say, the situation, as in belarus , so first of all

turn on the society, the so-called fugitives, who fled to poland in tulsha, including, i’ll ask you briefly about the mood, this is literally, judging by social networks, yes, which arose against the backdrop of the presidential decree on changing the algorithm for issuing belarusian passports, yes , and naturally, against this background, the initiative that appeared among those on the run with the creation of a new belarusian passport, let’s speak frankly, based on social networks and direct statements of those who are there, this situation has aggravated the panic sentiments about which depression, and fatal distrust of tikhonovskaya, in your opinion, why is this initiative with new belarusian passports abroad, yes, it is obviously insignificant, those fugitives who are there today, they really love such a section of our history as

belarusian ... of course, at least they think that they know it, so i want to remind them that this cannot even be called education, this project also printed its passports, distributed these passports, but no one ever received these passports admitted and those who fit into the bpr project , they turned out to be either stateless or without documents, this story takes place, the project that tikhanovskaya is now demonstrating, well, this is the project of these very pseudo-passports, because this document, no one will not recognize, otherwise it will be a precedent, otherwise it will be a precedent, for example, some catalonia will want to print its passports, south tyrol will go there, corsica will go. our own, that is

, it will be quite difficult for europe itself, the european union, when it happens anarchy of documents, so here, i see a certain point that some of these fugitives will try to renounce the citizenship of belarus, such a precedent is possible, they will now think about it, some of them have a choice to return or not, and i will remind you that if a citizen has committed offense, we have a return procedure with a commission, with everything , and there is a principle of legal inevitability of punishment for some kind of violation, yeah, this is, if, oh well, the person could give up,

the offense is not too serious, or... such an average, yes, but it happens, tikhanovskaya herself knows what kind of offense she committed, better than anyone, it is clear that someone there will give her citizenship of some small state there, yes, but others are not tikhanovskaya, others are not in prison on grants, others arrived with nothing, many with children, many with something else, that is , if i were the fugitives, i would advise them to return to belarus with a clear conscience, and live according to the laws of our country, think how reintegrate into belarusian society, and not live in dreams and imagination divorced from reality, their main problem is that in the twentieth year they imagined themselves to be those who they actually weren’t...’ they weren’t,

as for this precedent, what will it lead to, a split among the fugitives is already taking place, for reasons of funding for reasons of political ambitions, this is understandable , moreover, let’s also say frankly, fugitives are not the agenda of belarusian politics today, and not only belarusian, and not only belarusian, but they are today. .. on the sidelines, information agenda, political agendas, they are not particularly interesting to anyone, and after a single voting day, especially, this is the fate of such a character, about whom few people today will remember, like mr. semyon sharetsky, he resumed himself as president in exile in some ninety years, too

he was a fugitive, no one will remember him today, he is a political corpse, now we see how this whole machine of fugitives is gradually happening. like this very political corpse, yes, he is still on artificial respiration, yes, he is connected to some kind of devices in the form of grants, in the form some information resources, in the form of houses there in warsaw, in vilnius , but sooner or later the organs will begin to completely fail, the decomposition of the body will begin, to this decomposition, day by day we are getting closer and closer, after the elections of the twenty- fourth year twenty-fifth year, their meaning even for the west itself will become zero, and they know this very well, today they can

declare about passports, about some other documents, about some plans, as much as they like, but they are now of no interest to the west, their interest is... recruiting some terrorist organizations and nothing more, but being cannon fodder, i don’t think that’s what they want, no, they definitely don’t want that, when you see that the same failed president is being accused, well in fact, that she is to blame for the fact that such a decree appeared, the fate of samil the fugitives became even worse , this accusation against her does not even surprise me, in fact, peter, unfortunately, for me, unfortunately, is extreme , a near-philosophical traditional question, i will link it with ours the next parliamentary elections, and in general with a single voting day, yes, because

there are not only parliamentary elections, i used to think a lot about who should come to parliament, to the councils, to the all-belarusian people's assembly, i am sure that this is a question many people care because this is our future, but i am increasingly convinced that it is much more important to understand who definitely should not end up in them, in your opinion, who? our parliament is traditionally formed by a majoritarian system, if we say local councils, and it has traditionally happened that there people come under... the sectoral principle, here are teachers, doctors, people who are involved in international relations , agriculture, culture, and this is logical, because representative legislative bodies

must develop draft laws, regulations, that is, our legislative legal framework , that is, understanding what they are doing, understanding what they are doing , and moreover, understanding the industries that need to implement these legal acts, and therefore, who exactly should come to us, to our authorities, this those who have competence, this is firstly, and secondly, those who have experience are simple windbags, if we remember the early nineties, they began to study as political scientists, because they thought that if you studied to be a political scientist, you would become a politician , there shouldn’t be such people, why, because the main disease is these pseudo-democratic parliaments, yes, there is a

lot of circus, but very little sense, but our parliament should always be different in that we have many... those who should sit in parliament who minds his own business, and this the fundamental difference, we saw in our southern neighbor, we saw in some other states, is that when people are not in their place, to be in their place and choose those people who? this is what is most important for us, this is probably our main philosophical task , even said so, plato once said that

philosophers should rule, i don’t agree with him , people of work and people of action should rule, those who knows what to do, and not those who think about how to do it, probably the one who doesn’t like my homeland, and not in the sense that here we often talk about love, yes, i love my homeland, so he runs down the street, shouting that i love my homeland, right? but he doesn’t offer to do anything for the homeland and doesn’t do anything, probably the person who does it is the one who loves the homeland, these are not words, these are not emotions, this is a real result, if you love your homeland, show what you have done for it, and the candidate for deputy should not start with some program of what he will do, but he should show what experience he has and what he has done, what he has already done,

because parliament is not a place for random people, we are not a state that can afford to feed randomness in our legislative body for 4-5 years , but there are large states, it is the united states of america, some senators have even forgotten when to go to a meeting, and they’re just about 90 years old there. they are elected for 30 years, everything is done for them , lobbyists do everything, they receive a pension, we don’t need such cases, we are a compact, small state, not a gigemon, without colonies, we count every penny, we earn money through our own labor and want our deputies to be

people who do the same kind of work as we ourselves. there is no better designer than nature itself, how to talk about the most important things, without words, touch the art of saying it with flowers, floristry, than a bouquet, look in the fashion for culture program this weekend on