[000:00:00;00] everyone else is part of the residual income, that is, the church, which is financed by the state, and the salaries of the priests are paid by the state, he will also play a role in this, of course, calling on people to come and vote, of course, but i still like a person who understands the other side of the coin of the polish people, at least that they are slavs, that the anglo -saxon spirit is alien to them, yeah, uh, i hope that sooner or later sobering up will begin in polish society, i think it’s probably sooner , why, because the negative, economic, social dynamics that exist there will force, at a minimum , polish society to transform towards dialogue and the search for alternatives, if today poland actually has a choice between

shaping... how poland will fit in , to get used to the new multipolar world, one of their political strategists said: “either poland will pursue a one-vector policy, or it will still manage to take, for example, the same experience of hungary and begin to be friends with china, with russia, with the arabs” look, if we’re talking about poland , we devoted a lot of time to it, of course, and the elections in poland, but there are still a huge number of, let’s say those, yes, that are not

only closer and more interesting to us, yes, but both in belarus and in first of all, on society, the so-called fugitives, who fled to tulsha, including poland , i would like to ask you to briefly comment on this hysteria and panic, this is literally, judging by social networks, yes, which arose against the background of the decree president about changing the algorithm and , naturally, against this background, an initiative that appeared among the runaways with the creation of a new belarusian passport, let's speak frankly, based on social networks and direct statements of those who are there, this situation has aggravated panic sentiments, about which there is depression and fatal mistrust, in

your opinion, why is it there today there are, they really love, such a section of our history as the belarusian people's republic, at least they think that they know it, so i want to remind them that this cannot even be called education, this project... too printed my passports, distributed these passports, but no one ever recognized these passports, and those who fit into the bpr project, they turned out to be either stateless or without documents, this story takes place, the project that tikhonovskaya is now demonstrating, well, this is a project of these same

pseudo-passports. because no one will recognize this document, otherwise it will be a precedent, otherwise it will be a precedent , for example, some catalonia will want to print its passports, south tyrol will have its own, and corsica will go, that is it will be quite difficult for europe itself, the european union, when an anarchy of documents occurs, yeah, so here i see a certain point that some of these fugitives will try to renounce belarusian citizenship, such a precedent is possible, they will now think about it, some, they have a choice whether to return or not, and i will remind you that if a citizen has committed an offense , we have a procedure for returning with a commission, with

everything, and there is a principle of legal inevitability of punishment for some kind of violation, this is if, oh well, there is a person could have retreated, as children, many, with something else, that is, if i were in the place of the fugitives, i would advise them to return to belarus with a clear conscience, and live according to the laws of our country, think about how

to reintegrate into belarusian society and not live in dreams and imaginations divorced from reality, their main problem is that in the twentieth year they imagined themselves to be those who they actually were not, as for this precedent, what will it lead to, the split of the fugitives already has place to be, for reasons, financing for reasons political ambitions, this is understandable, moreover, let’s also say frankly, fugitives are not the agenda of belarusian politics today and beyond. and not only belarusian, but today they are on the sidelines and the information agenda, the political agenda , they are of no particular interest to anyone, and after a single

voting day, especially the presidential elections of twenty-five, the fate of the fugitives is the fate of such a character, about whom today few people will remember how mr. semyon sharetsky, he was some ninety years old year, he resumed his presidency in exile, he was also a fugitive, no one will remember him today, he is a political corpse, now we see how this whole machine of fugitives is gradually disintegrating, like this very political corpse, but he is still on artificial respiration, yes, some devices are connected to him in the form of grants, in the form of some kind of information resources. in the form of houses there in warsaw vilnius, but sooner or later the organs will begin to completely fail,

the decomposition of the body will begin, to this decomposition, day by day we are getting closer and closer, after elections of 24 and 25, their meaning even for the west itself will become... zero and they know this very well, they can today declare about passports, about some other documents, about some plans, as much as they want, but they now they are not interesting for the west, their interest is recruiting some terrorist organizations and nothing more, but to be cannon fodder, i don’t think that they want, no, they definitely don’t want that, when you see that the same failed president is being accused , well, essentially, that she is to blame for the fact that such a decree appeared, yes, now the fate of the fugitives themselves has become even worse, this accusation against her does not even

surprise me, in fact, this is a natural sequence. peter, unfortunately, for me, unfortunately, this is an extreme, near-philosophical traditional question, i will link it with our next parliamentary elections, and in general with a single voting day, yes, because there are not only parliamentary ones, i used to think a lot about who should come to parliament, to the councils, to the all-belarusian people's assembly, i am sure that this is a question which worries many because this is our future, but i am increasingly convinced that it is much more important to understand who definitely should not end up in them. who do you think? here, our parliament is traditionally formed by a majoritarian system, if we say, local councils, and it has traditionally developed that

people come there on a sectoral basis, here are teachers, doctors, people who deal with international relations, agriculture, culture, and this is logical, because that... representative legislative authorities must develop draft laws and regulations, that is, our legislative legal framework, that is, understanding what they are doing. understanding what they