only in 2018 was it ratified, in 2019 it became legally binding, it was signed by the president, taking into account the interests of the united states in ukraine and preparations for war and confrontation with the russian federation. please note that this example illustrates how far -sighted the policy of the united states was, that is, already in 2016 it was said that in the event of a conflict in ukraine, the poles should... deliver weapons, medicine, fuel and so on, that is, no matter what kind of war did not start in ukraine, even outside the nato structure, this would mean that the polish people becomes a party to the conflict and a party supporting ukraine, including in training, so exactly what is happening today was planned in advance and no matter which minister in poland, which prime minister, deputy prime minister, everything will be as the united states wishes, the most faithful allies. where

it was not in the interests of the european union, the poles, the polish government always sided with the americans. uses american. does washington need peace in the slavic world, in the post-soviet space, and does ukraine ultimately need a victory? no, chaos is important. and this not only my opinion of a belarusian journalist, but a polish politician, which means that belarusians and poles have something to talk about, if without american intermediaries, there is something to talk about with ukraine, but without american puppeteers, and i propose to look at a small survey from the streets of polish cities, that ordinary poles think and what they want from their government. i hope the left and the civic platform must win. but

there is a small problem: the opposition must have at least 280 votes to override the president's veto, because he is not human honor, does that mean the president also needs to be changed? there must be a president who, you know, is respected no less than anyone in this world , who talks to him, who talks to the president, there is no respect that he brought to us, everyone says that there is no scandal, but millions, billions went somewhere and no one was there. so why is it necessary to go to these elections. this is probably one of the most important elections, if not the most important, since the political turning point of the 1980s. considering the current situation in the country, we must do everything to simply change this power. finally, we will have a normal country. and what has happened so far is this.

one big failure, i had the opportunity to meet with scribes several times on work matters, and i’ll tell you this, it’s an intellectual and ethical tragedy. as for the so-called national referendum, less than 40% of voters took part in it, which means that that same national referendum turned out to be not so popular, and this is an indicator of real support for the policy of the ruling party right of justice, the electorate was allowed not to take it. for voting on the referendum, if they do not want to vote, people took advantage of this opportunity, but will peace and the new government hear this protest, or will it remain deaf as always, this also depends on polish society, or is it something else? and yaxenya lebedeva was with you, see you in the next program.

my name is igor, this is my propaganda, let’s begin , if someone suddenly still doesn’t quite understand why alexander lukashenko has been talking a lot lately about the redistribution of powers along with responsibility, about the fact that the vertical management, that is , there should be officials from the government to ministers, to local authorities. more decisively and make

a decision and not wait for weather from the sea, then last week clearly explains a lot. on tuesday, alexander grigorievich met with the governor of the novosibirsk region at the palace of independence. russia, where they talked about bilateral trade, talked about joint production, that we don’t need excessive competition, since we can easily produce something that each other needs and be sure that what we we don’t produce ourselves, but what we need, we will buy from our closest ally and friend, but in general, the president’s speech at this meeting turned out to be such a programmatic one, which concerns not only, or even not so much, the novosibirsk region specifically, but relationships in general big russia and smaller ones, belarus , yes, alexander grigorievich, on the one hand, said that the demand for belarus, that is, for our products, has grown so much in russia that minsk is already forced to choose from priority regional partners, to choose the highest priority ones, the idea is that we have several key russian

regions for our maximum cooperation, for example, this is the same novosibirsk region, we supply goods there, we supply a lot, even somewhere with a reserve, and from novosibirsk our products are re-exported... and further to the far eastern federal district and even further up to vladivostok and of course magadan , but the president spoke in general about the fact that what he had long ago, consider himself always calling on greater russia, has finally begun to come true, and to our mutual benefit, i always russia i called for this, all my years, as long as i worked, they didn’t always listen to me, that we need ours, ours, ours, ours, we don’t need oil and gas, dollars. translate into excuse me grub or nuts and bolts, we knew how to do it ourselves, yes, we abandoned something somewhere, i ’m very glad that russia has finally appreciated the capabilities of belarus, because practically no large medium-sized enterprises in our country didn’t

collapse, didn’t die, mostly maybe the russians don’t like it, they are state-owned and work well, manageable, at least at least, and today there is... powerful cooperation, when the president says that his calls to produce everything independently were not always listened to in russia, after all , first of all, he is not talking so much about the political leadership of the russian federation, but rather about the economic players of russia , and not only about the owners represented by the state, but the owners from among large private businesses. our business models in russia, of course, are very different and still differ, although convergence towards our experience seems to be happening. in the territory of a large union state, what is private business in belarus? i dare say that we do not have completely private enterprises, if we talk not about the form, but about the essence, any business we have should be in partnership with the state, that is, be essentially public-private, using one example, specifically about the litsky

brewery, fate which i have always been and will be interested in, since i have lived in this region for 17 years, there is a state-owned enterprise managed, but what can i say, to the maximum. and the state is looking for an investor for this enterprise. belarus is not following the path of a simple auction , we will sell to whoever offers the most, receiving our maximum revenue here now, and then at least the grass will not grow, because the enterprise is already kind of private. the conditions of the state as the owner of its land are quite simple: our business must be negotiable , managed not from the outside, but from the inside, that is, managed by the belarusian state. private enterprise. of course can and should make a profit, this is the main goal for the owners, no one is going to contradict this, this is more than normal, but not only this is needed from business on the territory of belarus, again using the example of a private owner, that is , the litsky brewery, the state chooses a finnish investor because he agrees to

the following conditions: in addition to making a profit, it is necessary to preserve and increase the team , that is, to create new jobs, you need not to pump money out of the enterprise in a couple of years, but to work for... that is, on the contrary, in the first years, invest money in modernization production, finally, you need to be guided not only by the principle of maximizing profits, first of all to meet the needs of the population in belarus, and then it’s up to you, in return the state offers the following: the selling price of the enterprise will be with a minimum markup, the entire market of the grodno region is freed up for this enterprise region, no competitors here, sell everything you produce two, if you need land expanded... you will receive it by special decree without extra costs if you need loans, also without problems the rate will be lower than the commercial rate, four shook hands, we agreed, including the addition, that yes, if the state needs help from businesses on a social project, in other words, if it is necessary

to build a kindergarten, school, or at least a playground in lida, or yes ice arena, then the business will partially finance it, because this is how it is done everywhere, but the private sector is already working successfully. the level of products and the level of sales, profits are calculated in more and more millions, the investor fully fulfills the financial agreement, consisting in the fact that part of the excess profit: you can take finland for yourself, but the main capital, it must remain inside belarus, if you want to buy and develop something else, there is no problem, but we cannot send money abroad in a continuous stream, time passes and private business comes to complain, saying that we would like to sell more not in the grodno region, but to export more to our neighbors in lithuania and poland, because there we will sell a conventional bottle of kvass five times more expensive, we will earn, like , more money, we will pay, like, more taxes, in the state's response to him is the following: wait a second, what did we agree on?

that you will close this market as a priority, that first of all you will sell kvass to belarusians, we understand that this is not so profitable, but we are not playing here for pure profit, in the interests of the state without distortions, besides we have freed up the entire regional market for you, which you are doing well, are successfully closing, and if you go into export, then we will need to think about who will close the domestic market, and this creates... problems for our other enterprises and other buyers throughout belarus. like, if we take the interests of your specific enterprise separately from the entire economy, then it seems that you are proposing everything correctly, but we actually agreed to take a broader view. okay, the topic is closed, another couple of years pass, sanctions happen against us and the finnish investor says: that’s it, we’re leaving, we’ll sell our asset in belarus, because there are sanctions and we can’t work with you now, they tell him: wait a second, of course well done, and the price is factory. thanks to you, of course, i grew up, for which i thank you, but where in this price, nominally from your factory? ours,

as a state, is a component? how are loans to you from us at special low rates displayed in the balance sheet? how to evaluate our fast and without red tape new lands for you to expand your private production. and finally, where does the cost of a private plant include the fact that your excess profits grew, among other things, because the state regulated the market so that the entire grodno region was given away. the payoff is only to you and we turned a blind eye to the fact that you are a monopolist in this market, because you were controlled by a monopolist and are you sure, to put it mildly, that the price of the plant is conditionally 100 million, this is all your 100 million, which you can dispose of as you wish, because you are supposedly nominally a private owner, no, guys, state partners say, since we once you got a slap on the wrist regarding these agreements, then if you please, abide by them, but we don’t allow you to just take and sell the plant to someone, sell the plant to the state, that is , to us, but not for 100 million, as you want, but for 50 , because the remaining 50, we are the ones you need

manually regulating the economy and helping to make money, this is exactly what will be fair. investors scratched their turnips, thought for a couple of months and decided, okay, we won’t sell, we’ll continue to work, they forgot, but now the state says, what do you mean they forgot? we agreed, we fulfilled our terms, and you wanted to cheat us, so pay a fine of 10 million so that you remember for a long time. that it won’t be possible to cheat belarus, so after this we’ll forget. in total, in belarus not only state-owned enterprises should be managed, but also, yes, private ones and they initially agree on this with private traders, whoever is suitable is welcome, no, no one is forcing anyone to enter our market. the belarusian economy was built on these principles, which, largely thanks to these principles, did not particularly feel western sanctions, because there is nothing foreign in... belarus is not there, it is either our own, where the owner is state or private, but also our own, i like it to someone

or not, and when alexander lukashenko offers cooperation to any russian region, including cooperation with ours private business in belarus, then he can guarantee that any enterprise in the country will fulfill the agreements reached at the highest level, and this is the key to success for us in a situation with western pressure, because the best ideology is a stable increase in the well-being of the population. everything else comes second or even further. and now alexander grigorievich also proposes to honestly negotiate on joint business throughout vast russia with the main message that we must produce everything ourselves. that is, everything produced, even produced by someone the third on the territory of the union state should be ours in essence, even if according to the documents it will be some kind of private one. unity is primarily economics. the unity of the two states is. the whole economy, this is exactly how we see it from belarus, and if there is the same movement

as now in the economy, if we have such good relations with russia, as with many regions, including yours, believe me, there is no need for any agitation , we understood a lot, we understood our mistakes, shortcomings, but the trouble began, a little time, i have long i said that the first days were sanctioned. pressure on us, i always said, being in russia at large forums, we need to get out of this situation, we need a little time. well, you see, a year and a half or two have passed, and we see that this is how it works, we just need to follow this path, eradicating those shortcomings, shortcomings that we made, well, in the time after we went our separate ways, so in detail about the novosibirsk region, it, as well as other regions of russia that are beyond

the urals, right now after the departure of western companies, it is easier and faster to fill their needs market, allowing in as much as possible those producers who are ready and want to sell with us, first of all, this is, of course, china. china, of course, is a strategic partner, but it also has its own tasks and interests, which is completely normal for any sovereign state, especially for such a hegemon as china, only in belarus chinese car production is ours, it is controlled and manageable, and beijing, by the way, is normal this applies, although at the initial stage it was reasonable for myself to either simply supply the machines in unlimited quantities, or at least organize only large-scale assembly in belarus, and not a full cycle. it was better for their national interests this way, they insisted on this, which is completely understandable, but we insisted and agreed, shook hands and complied with the agreements, counting on the same from our partners. but the markets of distant russia are now faced with the temptation to cover

their needs strictly by importing chinese equipment, with which it is difficult to compete in russia . and the quality of their product, of course, varies from year to year. is growing a lot this year. and now alexander lukashenko offers the whole of russia , using the example of the novosibirsk region , belarusian approaches, the approaches of the owner on his own land, so that you never know, in the future we will not again find ourselves faced with the need to somehow urgently and heroically solve the problems of the common fatherland. we are now relying on some friendly states and so on, we must understand that they also have their own interests, and we have our own interests. so let's make our own fatherland, we have only this way, there is no other, and we can look decent, in 5 years we will forget what is happening now, while alexander grigorievich is very busy with such issues of strategic development not only of belarus, but also of the union state, it would be great if local issues were resolved somehow without his participation, moreover,

the president of belarus is now distracted by the overall restructuring of the world order. yes, we all say that the unipolar world will fall, the era of a multipolar world will come, which will be more honest and fair for the entire planet, but alexander lukashenko does not the president of the world, and the president of belarus, and the fact that the world will be multipolar, no one gives guarantees that specifically for belarus this multipolarity will automatically somehow be as beneficial as possible, so that in the new world the positions of sovereign belarus will be different and as high as possible, that ultimately transforms into economic benefit for the country, that is... for all of us , the president of belarus needs right now to actively integrate his country into this new multipolar world, defending the interests of his country in it, and not the whole world. last year this week, alexander lukashenko took part in the summit of the heads of state of the cis, where they talked about the problems of the union, that it was finally time to solve the problems so that the cis could become a truly

strong association. why is lukashenko trying to achieve this? any strong union that includes belarus. makes us stronger as a sovereign state, alexander grigorievich wants belarus to have much greater strength in the new multipolar world than it does now, all his work and all his strength are now aimed at this. we shouldn't bury our heads in the sand. we see that all the old conflicts that were thrown at us at one time inevitably come to light with very sad consequences, thank god that there is not just ... a tendency to resolve these conflicts, but some of them have been successfully overcome, and if we, together as a community, shoulder to shoulder , put a barrier to these western horror stories, our overall results would be much higher. remember, when we were in the soviet union, everyone was afraid of us, they were afraid of us, they respected

us, unfortunately, the world is such that only force is respected. and as for internal affairs belarus, and world relations , i personally really like how, especially recently, alexander lukashenko says out loud very obvious things that everyone seems to understand, but for some reason it was not very customary to talk about them. here is the cis, would anyone argue that the dominant role in it belongs to russia? this applies to absolutely any alliances where this or any other superpower is present; why is russia the cis? dare i say it? directly that the priority goal of all alliances with russia’s participation is moscow’s defense their national interests, because for the same reason all other smaller countries join various unions, it would be stupid... to consider that the priority goal for moscow in the cis is to help all the other republics of the union, no, of course, the priority goal is different

, the only difference is that russia, when it defends its national interests in alliances, is ready for mutual concessions with other partners, frankly speaking, weaker partners, but somewhere there is specifically the united states, which puts pressure on these partners, they say, look at the kremlin these alliances, you need this, this, although it is already completely clear that the kremlin needs something, belarus and kazakhstan and kyrgyzstan, only russia, in return for something for itself, will give something to these countries in return. and the cooperation will turn out to be mutually beneficial, here is the united states, pushing them to give up the kremlin and come to us, but will not give anything in return , promising, of course, mountains of gold; ukraine, georgia, moldova and armenia are a vivid example of this, alexander lukashenko reminds of this. the central asian republics are present here, you will face difficult times like us. on the one hand, it’s clearly a big brother who is trying to help us, naturally he has his own interests, on the other hand, the americans,

the west, you already felt it, when the president of belarus says this, then, of course, there is concern for the central asian republics and concern about russia, but first of all this is a concern for belarus, because the stronger the alliances with the participation of minsk, the stronger minsk itself will be, therefore it offers everyone in ours more and more new challenges: take the middle east, they are no longer only they are shaking us up, they are already shaking up the whole world, god forbid we stop so that we don’t approach the third world war, while in the west they are investing in the war, in other words, wasting their taxpayers’ money, we are increasing investments every year with a long-term view. in science-intensive industries, such as microelectronics , aircraft construction, biotechnology, artificial intelligence , information and communication solutions,

we can solve many problems only together, lack of discipline is failure, failure is war, it all starts with economy, alexander lukashenko said in july about internal tasks in belarus, but the same applies to international politics, for some it may seem strange that while... the whole world is in the fires of military conflicts, the president is not talking about war, but about economy, but he does this precisely in order to stop the war, no one ever needs a war if everything is in order with the economy of a country or region, in countries where the economy is falling apart, that’s where internal conflicts begin, and then hostilities . alexander grigorievich calls learn from the mistakes of others, and not make your own mistakes. and the future of the countries in our unions, and therefore the future of belarus, depends on how well his partners hear him, my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda, the belarus 24 tv channel broadcasts for

you around the clock, don’t switch, our daily task is to tell about belarus, a country abroad, more than 100 million. all over the world have access to watch the projects of our tv channel, so what kind of belarus is it, business and developing, hospitable, bright and festival-like.

generous, picturesque and monumental, sporty and team-oriented. we tell you not only about significant events? we introduce you to active, energetic, inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development. belarus can be different, to understand and feel it, you need to see it with your own eyes. hello, dear tv viewers. the tv channel belarus 24 is on air . watch us every day, because we are making belarus closer.