Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]  BELARUSTV  October 25, 2023 9:30am-9:51am MSK

9:30 am
mature business, with appropriate payment systems. in fact, a number of concerns are being put forward in the expert community that it may become more difficult for small businesses, probably, but not entirely justified, because the tax systems that exist in the country for legal entities are quite developed, i’ll probably say this, lightweight and should not create burdens in work... for beginning entrepreneurs, in terms of business, adjustments will affect taxes on real estate, profit, income, for individual entrepreneurs the simplified taxation system is still prohibited, but such an opportunity remains for legal entities. and the tax rate in this case will be low at 6%. lower rates will encourage individual entrepreneurs to register legal entities, experts predict. the main thing , in sync with the tax code, is to adopt a law on entrepreneurial activity.
9:31 am
the document prescribes a simple and quick mechanism for business reformatting. if taxes for individual entrepreneurs increase, and we say that this is not always the case the activities of individual entrepreneurs are conscientious, transparent, and so on, but we still want to preserve this sector, but in a more organized version, it is very important for individual entrepreneurs to have a simplified transition to a legal entity, and these changes may partially affect some. .. of a certain group of people , but at the same time, business entities will always have a choice: switch to a legal entity, or remain an individual entrepreneur, pay increased taxes, or switch to a simplified a taxation system that, by and large, has not been abolished for legal entities. what is important is that they promise to make the new mechanism for the transition from an individual entrepreneur to a legal entity simple, fast and inexpensive. on the one hand, this reduces the fears and risks of the business, and on the other , it ensures transparency in its work.
9:32 am
today we will have this seamless transition, then practically the business entity applies according to the appropriate procedure, that from tomorrow i want to become a legal entity, that is, a private municipal enterprise, and almost all accounts, accounting taxpayer number and so on, they remain with him and from tomorrow he can no longer work as an individual entrepreneur petrov, but as a private unitary enterprise of petrov, so this transition is one that... is foreseen, it would generally make life easier to many business entities, i mean individual entrepreneurs. in the meantime, everything that sounds from television screens flashes in the press on the internet in the category of proposals. the code is undergoing a public expert sieve, so upcoming changes are likely, but for now are not mandatory; the approval of deputies will give them weight. in early november, the document is expected in the oval hall of parliament. olga anishchenko and victor borisov, area of ​​interest. prime ministers of the countries of the eurasian economic union. will meet in bishke on
9:33 am
october 26. the agenda has already been drawn up and the heads of government will discuss the key directions for the further development of degradation processes within the union until the thirties and forties. no less important issues are the selection of joint cooperation projects in industry and their financial support. in addition, the ec will present reports on the formation of common eac markets for gas, oil and petroleum products. well, the day before the council met at a meeting. eurasian economic commission. belarus was represented by deputy prime minister igor petrishenko and anton malyuta, who will talk about the main results of these negotiations. industrial cooperation remains one of the main drivers for the development of the economies of the eu countries, because in the face of current challenges it is important to stick together. but how to select the best projects and provide support for their financing is a debatable issue. new will consider the mechanisms. the draft document has already
9:34 am
been approved by the council of the ec, another decision of the council introduced changes to the technical regulations on the safety of small vessels. the new edition defines a list of products to which the technical regulations do not apply, the term small boat is also clarified, and definitions are given for the term aerial boat and jet ski. for a more precise understanding of the requirements of the technical regulations , it is determined what applies to means of active recreation on water, these are, for example, inflatable floating devices with the exception of boats, towables, water skis, wakeboards, banana boats, circles and the like. sailing and parachute equipment, ice boats, boards for kiteboarding, surfing and the like and others, including equipment for spearfishing and diving. also, the ec council extended the experiment on the use of belarus and russia navigation seals until july 1 next year, the experiment concerns timber and
9:35 am
wood products, it has been in force for 8 months. during this time, navigation seals were applied to more than four hundred transportation intermediate results of the experiment in the spring. 2023 have already been considered at the commission council, where it was decided to extend this experiment until the end of this year. in addition, the practical experience gained as part of the experiment was taken into account in the preparation of the commission’s regulations necessary to begin the implementation of the agreement on the use of navigation seals in the union for tracking transportation, signed on april 19, 2020. the second year. let me remind you that the agreement is aimed at ensuring legal trade goods in the union by expanding the use of modern technical and technological solutions when organizing transportation across the territory of the union, as well as minimizing the use of customs measures and other types
9:36 am
of government control in relation to the transportation of goods during transit, export and in mutual trade. the start of the practical implementation of the agreement is scheduled for... at the meeting of the ec council, attention was paid to international issues, so work on the draft free trade agreement between the eac and iran has been completed, sign the document is planned until the end of the year, but still the main focus is on internal issues, for example, changes have been made to the rules for registration and examination of drugs. the rules for issuing perpetual registration certificates for medicines within the framework of the relevant procedure have been adjusted. additional safety measures for the use of medicinal products, which may be introduced at the request of the authorized body. duplication of documents submitted as part of registration as part of control and inspection procedures is eliminated assessing the production and quality of clinical
9:37 am
trials during inspections. the decision made will allow optimizing administrative procedures related to bringing the registration dossier of medicines in accordance with the requirements of the union. ultimately, this will help ensure the availability of medicines to the population. all solutions are aimed at simplifying the lives of citizens and the work of companies in our countries, and also to be technologically independent. the eurasian electric bus program, which was proposed by belarus, participation of four countries is expected, but this is not the final figure. interest from armenia and kyrgyzstan is currently being studied. anton malyuta, area of ​​interest. and that’s it for today, all the information about the most noticeable things in the economy; we will tell you in the area of ​​interest tomorrow. let me remind you that we are on air every tuesday, wednesday and thursday, good news, may everything work out for you.
9:38 am
hello viewer, my name is igor tur, this is my propaganda, let’s begin: we all genetically need a king, he said at a historical forum in the national library of propaganda in mid-october, after which the fugitive opposition, and so three inside, as well as those who did not try to understand the content of the thought, assessed the form, began to build conspiracy theories, they say, since propaganda started talking about tsarism, then almost by inheritance they are going to transfer power to lukashenko and in general, if so, then they are going to abolish parliament, the supreme national assembly and other democratic institutions, the karau are robbing human rights and
9:39 am
freedom of opinion. alas, sometimes you have to chew it out, although i am personally convinced that the bulk of the criticism did not come from people stupid people who understood everything perfectly , whether they agree or not, this is already a question: the second, but for critics of the current government, only the reason is important, and then the criticism stretches like that owl on that globe. in 2020, i’ll tell you one trick, this is how i filtered ideological opponents into those who are assholes of the rest, with whom it is theoretically possible to conduct some kind of dialogue. i asked opponents of the current president to name at least three clear advantages of belarus under lukashenko, and preferably not from history, but at the current moment, because it is impossible under any circumstances for any power in any country in the world to be strictly negative, this is impossible from a logical point of view, and if necessary, you can even name the advantages of the power of macron with scholz, douda with morowiecki, nauseda with biden, for all that
9:40 am
that power is destructive for their countries, and if i see the advantages of biden’s power, this does not mean at all that i love america and biden, although still part of the audience has already spat on the screen, so if a representative of the opposition in belarus does not maybe it refuses... to name the advantages of lukashenko’s power, then he is either an idiot or a controlled manipulator, who still cannot be argued with, and it is inappropriate to continue the dialogue either with the first category of opponents or with the second, because it is... completely useless. and now comes the past week, which is marked, among other things, by the anniversary of the first all-belarusian people's assembly, it took place on october 19 , 1990, when i was 7 years old, and today’s political observer tur finds that chronicle very useful and interesting, because many of the answers are contained in history . so, why did lukashenko today come up with the idea of ​​strengthening the role of the supreme national assembly in the political life of the country. the most popular version of his opponents is the following: when lukashenko leaves the post of president , they will put someone in this chair instead of himself, and he himself will become the head of the supreme national assembly, it is he who
9:41 am
will actually be the main one in the country, that is, supposedly the supreme national assembly is strengthened in order to so that the ex-president retains power, since the former leader of the country is by law automatically a delegate of the all-belarusian people's assembly, the version sounds harmonious and beautiful, if not historical contradictions, the ninety-sixth year of the first supreme council in the history of the country, the young president lukashenko lists the delegates of the meeting, the leadership... of the security council , the constitutional court, the supreme council, the supreme court, former leaders of the belarusian state, at the very first all-belarusian people's assembly 27 years ago, when there was no trace of today’s realities and the issue of transfer of power, alexander grigorievich already invited former leaders of the country to the all-russian national assembly, that is, the experience of former leaders of the state to develop lukashenko considered the strategy important both ten years ago and today.
9:42 am
nothing has changed in the president’s position during this time; he is honest both to himself and to the electorate. i therefore consider the conversations that the supreme national assembly is supposedly being set up under lukashenko to be closed. what else did young lukashenko say in 1996? he spoke about western democratic values. and yes, in this regard, alexander grigorievich has not changed either. we do not question the significance of the system of western parliamentarism, but we believe that the implementation general democratic values ​​in each specific country must correspond to its historical experience and the age-old way of life of the people. the question is not at all whether democracy is good or bad, just as in general any system of government cannot be called good. or bad, because, i repeat, what was said in the same program a year ago is just form, not
9:43 am
content, there are good democracies, there are bad ones, there are good dictatorships, there are bad ones, there are good authoritarian regimes, there are bad ones, when you offer to evaluate the form power, and not its essence, then most likely they are simply trying to manipulate you , i don’t think that democracy is bad, just as i wouldn’t call all democratic institutions and principles bad, some are sensible, but some are... for example, a second round in any election, when power is given not to a representative of the majority of the electorate, but to one of the representatives of some electoral minority, this is absolutely bad, but you cannot take something characteristic of one society with its own cultural and historical characteristics and transfer it to society other, where the cultural, historical and genetic background is completely different. a little bit about boring history: democracy appeared in ancient greece, because the word democracy is derived from the ancient greek demos , in direct translation, this is the people, but there are nuances,
9:44 am
even in this beloved wikipedia of yours you can read that at first the term demos denoted free citizens only men having civil rights, in contrast to slaves and other categories of the disadvantaged population, then demos was the name of the common people, mainly the rural population, in in contrast to the tribal aristocracy, then part of the urban population, artisans and traders were also included in the demos, after which the term demos began to be applied primarily to the poor. in modern times, demos refers to the unprivileged sections of the population in a class society, that is, the common people opposed to the elite. if you noticed, never in history has demos meant the totality of all people living in a state. demos has always been some part, a larger or smaller part. society, and
9:45 am
this is a semantic feature of the term demos and its derivative democracy, if you look at it, it comes into conflict with the universal electoral right that comes to a person upon reaching a certain age, but let’s say democracy in greece or somewhere else has been brought up for centuries historically in the modern sense democracy is the collegial participation of all citizens in making the most important decisions in the life of the state through various institutions , primarily the election of representatives of the people to parliament or the election of the president, hence there is a persistent narrative that in democracy the people have power, and where there is no democracy, anyone has power, but not the people as a whole, and this is presented as something negative, but in order for democratic institutions to work effectively, the demos, that is, the people, must have at least two most important properties , the first is the ability to make collective decisions; second, what is even more important, the ability to obey a collectively made decision, when heating was turned on in minsk, a pipe burst in one of the high-rise buildings and the entire entrance
9:46 am
left with cold batteries, with a dictatorial model of entrance control, the dictator would give everyone a task: what to do to eliminate or minimize the problem? everyone would have obeyed more. but in the entrance, or rather in the entrance chat, there is no dictatorship, there is democracy there. and when, using a completely legal democratic procedure, the demos of the entrance determined what everyone needed to do to solve the problem, part of the demos of the entrance refused to submit to the democratically made decision, because they formed their own electoral minority, which had your view on solving the same problem. as a result, 70% of the demos at the entrance solved the problem in one way, 30% in another, and this difference in approaches to solution not only did not eliminate the problem, but also aggravated it; the efficiency of the democratic choice turned out to be not even zero, but negative. the most interesting thing is that there were about fifty people in this chat, all wonderful citizens, but the funny thing is that 49 of them, specialists in different fields, had an opinion on how to solve
9:47 am
the problem. and one of them is a former specialist in the housing and communal services system, who is absolutely... exactly he knew what to do and how, but in the chat, during a democratic discussion of the problem, he was not the most verbose , and he couldn’t shout out to the others who were shouting their opinion, but he wanted to say the following: this is not the solution to the problem that won the vote, neither the second one, which was adopted by the electoral minority of the entrance, are correct, the entrance in this democracy was initially doomed to failure, because in voting to solve the problem the voices ... of those who have an opinion on what should be done, and the voices of those who know exactly what needs to be done, they are equivalent to one, something similar , i said, at that historical forum of the audience, the audience, i admit, did not like it very much, if our audience is now asked where are you all go to lunch and propose, let's choose ourselves collectively and decide, firstly, everyone will quarrel, because
9:48 am
everyone wants something different, no one will go anywhere, and secondly, even if there is a democratically elected decision, we go to this dining room 40% of the audience voted for this option, the remaining 60% audiences are not able to make a democratically elected decision, they will begin to sabotage this decision, somewhere democracy is good today, where the desire for collegial decision-making and subordination to a collectively made decision has been historically formed, everything next to ancient greece is good, or this is the cradle of democratic values, naturally , united states of america, a country without a name, because its name indicates that on the territory of continental america the states, that is, administrative-territorial units, united with with the same success there could be some united cantons of europe or cooperation of districts of asia, but please do not compare with the ussr, our union is different, because in the soviet union there was a centralized power to govern the country, in the usa every governor is his own locomotive.
9:49 am
so, when you have fifty huge independent ones on a giant continent. units with different geographies, different population structures, very different economies, you want it, you don’t want it, but you are forced to gather all the leaders to make a common decision these fifty states are trying to make some kind of collegial decision , but it is impossible to gather like this on any issue, because it will take a long time to run the very process of solving the problem, then a parliament is introduced into this system, whose function is to delimit what needs to be adopted collegiately on the territory of the united states. and on what issues can each state act independently, but all these fifty states still participate in international politics and economics, and in order to speak for all fifty states, someone needs to be appointed, so a figure appears the president of the united states, who voices something that fifty states and parliament have decided, but
9:50 am
who actually does not participate in decision-making, because he does not represent anyone, nor the population of any of the states, because each state... has its own representative , not parliament, because it also has its own representative, nor the population of the united states, because washington does not allow its demos to come within a cannon shot of even this talking head for real elections. this is a good model of government, but it is only effective for one thing government development, only for the usa. for us slavs, we need something else, what do we need? now let's move on to the sharpest part. we all genetically need a king, a person who makes the final , irrevocable decision. and here, at the same time, i will show another fragment of alexander lukashenko’s speech at the very first all-belarus people’s assembly. and you

27 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on