[000:00:00;00] which actually does not participate in decision-making, because it does not represent anyone, neither the population of any of the states, because each state has its own representative, nor parliament, because it also has its own representative, nor the population of the united states, because for real elections, even this talking head, washington does not allow its demos to come within a cannon shot. this is a good model of government, but this model is effective only for one state structure, only for the united states. for us slavs, we need something else. what do you need, now let's move on to the sharpest part. we all genetically need a king, a specific person who makes the final, irrevocable decision. but here at the junction, i will show another fragment of alexander lukashenko’s speech from the very first all-belarusian people’s assembly, and you can draw your own conclusions about what the president thinks today. for belarusians, this is, first

of all, a great tradition of a nationwide evening. at which the most complex issues were resolved. there seems to be a logical conflict brewing between the statements: we need a king in our tradition there is a national veche, but no, the tsar and the veche historically exist in our country in a single system of government. longer history: there is a king who makes basic decisions, not mandatory ones, first of all, this decision concerns international politics, as well as cornerstone issues on taxes, laws, and so on. the king... has a warrior, his inner circle, people who know how to think and decide, who offer something to the king, advise something, and are also able to independently resolve important issues within the framework of their competencies. there is a veche a broad meeting of the population in cases where the decision is categorically strategic, where a priori the support of the majority of people in the state is needed, and, more importantly, the implementation of this decision. historically, the veche met very rarely, mainly on three

occasions: imprisonment. yes, that is, an agreement with the prince, a modern analogue, rather not an election , but the inauguration of the prince, and also the evening was gathered to declare war or to conclude peace at the end of the war, to gather the evening to declare war, everything seems to be clear regarding peace, peace, of course, everyone wants, but after a war peace is achieved through mutual concessions, and the vecha met precisely in order to approve them, because if there are too many concessions, then this is more likely not peace, but capitulation with the corresponding consequences for the state and its citizens in the territories in the economy: the tsar, the boyars, the vecha, this has been the traditional form of government for us for centuries, this is the base, and to it we can and should add a superstructure from what are called democratic institutions, this is the election of a leader, that is president, and parliamentary elections, and a national referendum, but without this base everything else is not bad, but alien to us , they overthrew the tsar, cut the boyars, what happened,

the general secretary, the politburo... cpsu, the tsar of the boyars vecho, the soviet union collapsed, what happened, the president, parliament, the supreme national assembly, also a traditional form of government. of course, in life the associations are not always direct, say, the boyars can be someone else in positions, but the very essence of the power structure for the slavs is characteristic of exactly this: a strong leader, capable of accepting strong-willed decisions, a strong and intelligent boyar, capable of giving sensible advice to the leader and resolving some issues independently, and a large collegial body for making strategic decisions. i will say that i think that this system is generally the most effective when all three of its components perform their functions, but in belarus the system of authoritarian state governance worked effectively, and that’s exactly what we have, you didn’t hear it, although i’m sure you did heard the president talk about authoritarianism last week, and almost three decades, one strong leader carried all his functionality on himself, and often also the boyars and the veche, for various reasons, there were periods

when... the boyars advised some kind of nonsense, in other situations, to assemble a veche meant drowning in the endless process of some then discussions. and now, it seems to me, alexander grigorievich is restoring the historical balance of the system, strengthening the role of the all-belarusian people's assembly as a general assembly, but there is a nuance: the king, the boyars of the veche or the president, the officials of the supreme national assembly, the system is most effective when the strong, let me remind you that each of its elements is. on friday. gathered officials to discuss the creation of a strategic decision center. i have a suspicion that alexander grigorievich also convened a large and public meeting in order to publicly remind what kind of government model we have in general and why strong boyars are important in it. considering our authoritarianism, there will be strict control over

the implementation of compliance with those instructions that are given, including by the president, they are not only the invention of the president himself, but we are working on many issues together. of course, there are cases when the decision is made personally by alexander grigorievich and he simply cuts down tasks on how we will do it, i will talk about this later, but basically we have a traditional form of decision-making for our history, the president gathers ministers to collectively work out the order that then he will sign, that is, the tsar gathers the boyars, it is important for me that you appreciate not the form about the tsar, but the essence of what i am saying, when by strengthening the vns we return everything... the management system of the historical veche, it does not contradict a strong leader, but complements the system: three authorities must be strong, i will say this again, the tsar, the boyars, the veche, is our leader strong, unconditionally and unequivocally, and

even our enemies have long understood this, they are forced to take this into account, he essentially single-handedly resolves issues with preventing war in our home, with restructuring the economy under sanctions, in general with regard to the development of the country, including, he single-handedly makes decisions on which... perhaps they are in doubt, but if we gather the assembly , then it’s unlikely that anyone will agree, but perhaps the wrong decision will be made, let me say it again as it is, if the meeting had gathered and asked whether to build a nuclear power plant in belarus, then the remaining fear after the chernobyl tragedy would most likely have led to the fact that the meeting would have decided no, on a cool head everything would agree that it is necessary, but fear makes the head very hot, in this situation the leader independently makes a difficult decision, which then, as fears dissipated with the launch of as, everything that the boyars, that the veche, that in general everyone in the country, all recognized correctly. yes, chernobyl is difficult for our people, but this is my decision, i will go and make this decision. and on friday, lukashenko talks about

strategic projects. let's say, in general, how the process of selecting and implementing these projects will function is secondary , whether the ministry of economy, the government will do it, or whether a new council or center will be created - this is secondary, as long as it is public to the whole country about what we need for the presence of a strong supreme national assembly, a strong president, and strong officials, if the boyars are underperforming, then their the tsar will again have to take over the functionality, in this case there is no particular need for the veche, and when some other, most likely weaker, leader comes to replace the current leader, then with the weakness of the boyars the entire system of power will crumble and nothing will save from this , we are implementing at the wrong time, this is already the norm, but what worries me most is that our government, instead of sometimes, not always, doing specific things, it begins to lie and misinform the president,

in order to show itself in the best light, i’m afraid so that this does not happen in belarus tradition, looking in the mirror, we will not hold the country, i have been working in the presidential pool since the spring of 2017, for me... october 2023, now the most important political day in the profession, if you evaluate not the form, but the content, my name is igor tur , this was my propaganda, just one chance to show your strength, this is a ball of thread, nicheriad, oriad thread, absolutely correct. answer, how is perpet mobile translated from latin? i took latin 2 years ago, the last time, this is an amazing revelation, demonstrate your intellectual potential throughout the country. yes, what are you going to do, well

, absolutely at the same time , our participants click on which english football club plays its home matches at the goodison park stadium. pavel, everton, absolutely right, they are gathering here. the smartest and bravest thing, not only the east, it’s a delicate matter, to build a tower from crooked elements, it’s also a subtle art that gave you this idea, i love ballet, alexander gleb, alexander gleb, absolutely right, this is the correct answer, one of the best football players in the history of belarus, watch in intellectual and entertainment shows on the belarus 24 tv channel, humanity will not survive the emergence of artificial intelligence, because the concept itself will change. man, forever, we already see a future in which such a concept as a country , community, team, family, it is absent, remaining in their pseudo-civilized world at

the moment, they close the border from everything traditional, from all the values ​​that we position now from the countries of the east, making it worse only for themselves, in order in order for you to understand the present, you must understand the past. read it, and accordingly, the mistakes of the past, learn how to avoid the mistakes of the future, you cannot give three things in life: mother, you cannot betray god, and you cannot betray the earth. markov’s project is nothing personal, just the truth,