exchanged instruments of ratification, this moment meant the beginning of large-scale work to implement the key provisions of the union treaty. of course, in this profound document, carefully researched and verified, serious attention is paid to the interaction of the parties to ensure regional security, but at the same time, the key to the success of the union state is verified. taking into account the interests of two sovereign countries and solving the problems of union building unconditionally and immediately on the foundation of mutually respectful coordination of positions unification and coordination of efforts of foreign policy departments, the ministry of defense, border services, on the basis of unconditional unity of approaches and the presentation of identical positions in the vast majority of cases. we believe that the most important factor

in increasing the level of regional security is the guaranteed interaction of countries, also not only in the defense and military-political spheres, but also presenting to the world a completely unique mode of interaction. within the framework of the discussion of economic integration and its tasks in meeting of the supreme state council on november 4, 2021, at the same time a new edition of the military doctrine of the union state was adopted , at the same time the heads of state and members of the supreme state council approved the concept of migration as a document

of special openness and support for the arrival of all those citizens of other states who are ready to comprehend our history, to get acquainted with our sights, participate in business associations, improve your skills, and just relax, today we especially emphasize that under the ideology of the union state we are implementing programs that... are financed from the union budget. this year, for the first time, the union budget was increased by 38%. and the forced response to the threat challenges that characterize the situation in the eastern european region was the support of new defense programs of the union state, this is the improvement of the military infrastructure of the regional grouping of forces stationed on the territory of belarus and

the modernization of the toll support infrastructure of the same military group, which has already begun implement the program ensuring a different, fundamentally more successful level of border security, i think that in europe, on the continent, the world has noticed the position that vladimir vladimirovich putin outlined recently when he said that defense. the territory of belarus will be perceived by the russian federation as the defense of the common borders of the union state. today, this practice is increasingly supported and this practice is being implemented. but at the same time i will also say that the uniqueness of the unification of the union state is certainly that no one from the territory of russia and there were no threats to belarus. no one can ever say that.

russia would not be open to dialogue, but at the same time, of course, the principled position of our countries, disagreement with the activities of the international community outside the norms of international law, and the call for activities according to the rules cannot be supported. today, in greetings from alexander grigorvich lukashenko, we heard words of assessment of the situation that is developing in the region, and of course, this will also happen. taken into account in the activities of the union state, but i also want to return to to what the national leader of belarus said just a few days ago, at a meeting with the governor of the novosibirsk region, the west will now try to cut the unity of belarus and russia. he said that the special services and intelligence are warning about plans to separate belarus and russia, and it was emphasized that they live and see that our unity must be cut. fraternal states,

today that groundwork is based on historical, cultural, spiritual tradition, on our historical memory, which present... the russian federation, the republic of belarus, in its own way, is also a special resource, a special resource of interaction. that is why i want to emphasize on november 4 of the year twenty-one, and not from the winter months of the year twenty-two, a new stage of economic integration began. we see how the successfully interconnected program, consisting of 28 allied programs, strengthens our position. during the implementation of a unified industrial policy, policy in the agricultural sector, the policy of central banks, as a result of the creation of an interstate center for customs risk management committee, the readiness of the parties literally next month to release documents that

will determine the operation of the new supranational tax authority irritates our enemies. but by this we show an increase in the level of competitiveness of the union state, a response to sanctions, unprecedented pressure, absolutely unfounded, as the national leaders of belarus and russia have repeatedly said, and by this we show millions of citizens of russia and belarus that together we are stronger, that interaction in the economic sphere, v social sphere, cultural and humanitarian gives obvious results, and we of course would like many of our allies to join such work, which is why we are actively interacting with the european economic union, interacting in the commonwealth of independent states formats, we certainly welcome the fact that in the near future belarus must gain the status

of a full member of the sco, then our practice of interaction will be in a certain way invested in the overall potential of interaction: within the framework of the shanghai family, this is important and valuable, today we want to talk about peaceful tasks, but today we understand perfectly well that the west’s unwillingness to interact with a union state, on the basis of an equal dialogue, is a factor that we must take into account, the words of vladimir vladimirovich putin that the west is political... colonial an approach that is expressed in the requirement to maintain order based on rules; whoever saw these rules, no one saw them, because no one ever wrote them and no one ever agreed with them. today the world

is going through a special period, and the speeches of sergei felovich alenik, sergei vikovich lavrov, the minister of foreign affairs of hungary, the secretary general of the udkb, alarm sounds, there is concern that the gap between what is said from high rostrums within the framework of protocol statements and the actual affairs of the collective west, unfortunately it is growing. and in conclusion, i would allow myself to turn to the words of the famous american hawk, who at one time occupied high positions in washington, this... down in brzzinski, he wrote: in 94: russia can be either an empire or a democracy, it cannot be both at the same time. without ukraine, russia ceases to be an empire. ukraine, bribed and subjugated, russia

automatically with ukraine turns into an empire. this is what worried the ideologists of post-soviet interaction between the west. years when the embrace of the west was extremely formally friendly, as if sincere, and the handshakes were strong. in the 21st century, writes bryzinsky, america will develop against russia, at the expense of russia and on the ruins of russia. it's written 30 years ago. there was no special military operation, there was no tension as there is today. we see in the north caucasus zone, within the framework of complex interaction with the fraternal people, one of the post-soviet republics. for america, russia is too weak to be its partner, as before, but

too strong to be just its patient. and the final words, russia is a defeated power, it has lost a titanic struggle. there is no need to feed illusions now. great power thoughts: russia will be a fragmented ward. russia needs to discourage such an image . and one of the phrases that concerns. think about this ideologist who is actually an active functionary in the security sphere of the united states in relation to belarus. germany's zone of special interests can be depicted as an oval, in the west including all of france, of course, in the east, the liberated post-communist states of central and eastern europe, but above all the baltic republics, ukraine and belarus. it was then that the model was already laid for russia,

belarus, our allies from the system partnership relations, and this is a given that must be answered by strengthening our interaction, supporting economic and social plans, the right to defend historical truth, including the feat of the soviet soldier of the peoples of the soviet union in the great patriotic war, and not forgetting for centuries the peoples of the former soviet union lived together, in the vast majority of historical facts in the world, building a joint future in harmony, and this conference is very meaningful, large-scale, an agenda that is verified and thought out by belarusian colleagues, also an important contribution to the work that we all want to be involved in, the work of understanding the world, clearly, sincerely.

professional response to the challenges of the threat, consolidation of our efforts and counteracting the unjust unipolar world, which the national leaders of belarus and russia oppose, which is opposed by millions of people who do not agree with the fact that their will is being imposed on them on how to live, how to act, etc. moreover, no one has ever canceled this right in our country, in conclusion i would like to quote the words: one of the russian experts, who literally just these days asked the question; at one of the discussions, he asked the participants, his fellow political scientists, and said: how would the leadership of the soviet union react within the framework of the dialogue with the federal chancellor of germany, which took place in 1988-1989, about the unification of germany, if then the federal chancellor had told the leadership of the ussr that in 2023... they would be ready to supply german tanks, german equipment, german

missiles, german weapons, shells and german mercenaries to fight russia, what would have been the fate of an ununited germany, what would have been the fate of a group of troops, a group of soviet troops in germany on the territory of this country, a number of groups of troops that were located on the territory of the countries of the eastern bloc, the world would be completely different, so this is the insidiousness that he was talking about... brzezinski, in a certain sense of the word, it is correlated with indignation regarding the victory in world war ii over fascism, the resentment of the current national leaders who have only gone through party school , without knowing life on earth, and who are ready to do everything to cross out the truth about the war, to cross out the role of the soviet union of post-soviet republics in the victory that provided that civilizational model with the fruits of which, the successes of which we ... we still use it today on the widest scale, thank you for your attention , let me emphasize once again, for the right to speak here, thank you,

thank you very much, thank you, dmitry fedorovich, allow me, i will give the floor to the deputy minister of foreign affairs, head center for political and international studies, ministry of foreign affairs of iran, muhammad hassan sheikh ollami, please.

ministers, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, i am honored to participate in this important conference, i would like to express my sincere gratitude to mr. allenik, minister of foreign affairs, for the invitation to participate in this forum, for the opportunity to exchange views and views with the distinguished participants of this conference on the reality and prospects of security issues in this changing world. as you know. the eurasian region extends from the border of russia to the borders of mongolia and china, part of this region are the caucasus, central asia, afghanistan, geographical latitude, and

the geopolitical and geostratic importance of eurasia cannot be. important countries in this region are also significant participants in international political processes. the role and significance of the eurasian region in security matters is undeniable. and we appreciate that the organizers of this conference. understand how the world is changing, because they have own experience after the collapse of the soviet union. there is a conflict in ukraine, a country in this region. and we need to reconsider the concept of security and development of regional security. after the collapse of the soviet union and after the involvement

of outsiders in the processes. in which new threats and new opportunities were created, new disagreements, new disputes , conflicts, wars appeared, on the one hand, on the other hand , new ways of cooperation, new forms of cooperation were formed, between and such organizations, as the shanghai cooperation organization, we have seen a recovery. we saw the founding of the eurasian economic union and the csto, which can be seen as a new wave of development, but on the other hand, these transformations may also have their consequences. dear colleagues, we are seeing

significant signs of widespread and significant change. scientists, politicians, and today, even world leaders, recognize that these signs really exist and do not hesitate to discuss them, do not hesitate to talk about them, however, there is no single point of view towards consensus we are not on this issue, and the intensity of changes is only increasing. there are three approaches to this topic: first, those who believe that the changes we are seeing are instrumental and functional in nature, the world must adapt to new emerging threats and the mechanisms of this

world must also adapt, as well as cognitive changes to level of society. the second approach involves changes at the level of the global world order. this means that with the emergence of new process participants, after system failures unipolarity and unilateralism, we must form a new world order in which multilateralism will be observed. or the presence of at least several centers of force, but the changes and their intensity imply more. all this may lead to changes in the system of international relations as such.

changes in this system, as you well understand, were provoked. changes in philosophical worldviews and values, and the structure of the international system, the role of participants in the processes, their role in the management processes of this system, as well as the distribution of role opportunities among the main participants is a major issue. we also wonder how in this. how, in the context of this high-level conference, can we determine what level of development is possible for us, and more importantly, what we see for achieving justice, peace, stability and security in the world. we are focusing on

security in eurasia, but using this idea, i would like to clarify the approach of the islamic republic of iran to this important issue, but before that, let me remind you... models for structuring and creating regional security architecture. the first model is called the balance of power. we all know about her. the second model is a hegemony-based security system. the third model is collective security. and this model works in. conflict resolution, it is accepted by all countries in the regions, since it is it that makes it possible to actively protect those who are victims of aggression in such

an environment, and the fourth model is called comprehensive security or a comprehensive security model, and i believe that it is for everyone we need it because it extends to a wider range of issues and problems that also include the economy, energy, food, between states, poverty eradication, terrorism issues and so on. this is a concept characterized by a security system that uses military force as little as possible in a situation where it is necessary to establish peace and security over a wider area. dear colleagues, over the past 30 years, this model has been the basis and focus of

islamic republic of iran, it is on the basis of this model that we build relations with our neighbors in the region, within the framework of this approach, we believe that any approach based on militarization or unilateralism, the creation of military blocs, the intervention of third-party participants and actors in our affairs, especially i mean those who are not countries in this region, all this undermines our security, but also leads to destructive competition, the creation of tensions that ultimately result in wars. the crisis in ukraine is excellent an example of how the model imposed by nato did not work. and now in the region we have been observing an unnecessary destructive war for several years, from the point

of view of security from the point of view of the islamic republic of iran, we need to develop a security system for the eurasian region , taking into account the interests of the countries of this region, taking into account the ideas of the countries of this region, based on this the idea is that we can... provide the necessary basis for mutual understanding and subsequent work by the countries of the region on security guarantees. another principle that we we must consider in detail the security architecture in our region. it must be inclusive. this means that all security mechanisms must involve every participant, every representative of this region. with this. models, no country should be excluded from the process, as this could lead to instability in the region. and countries that do not participate in

such a model can use measures to ensure their own security, to the detriment of others. but when creating architecture security, interests are not taken into account on an equal basis. we all focus on western programs or on the doctrines of military organizations that are associated with western countries, for example, nato, and which sometimes only add fuel to the fire of conflicts, and the situation in ukraine confirms this. let me say that iran deeply regrets what is happening. in palestine regarding the occupation and aggression and the massacre of ordinary ordinary palestinians, we condemn this

situation and declare, dear participants, i i would like to briefly mention some of the opportunities and challenges associated with ensuring security in the region. in my opinion, the most important opportunity that the countries of the eurasian region have is, firstly, a global transition to a system of international relations that gives opportunity to all countries and which creates additional... opportunity for the countries of the eurasian region and the rejection of asymmetric transfers of power . secondly, we abandon the one-sided approach. and we welcome the transition to pluralism of centers strength. alliances need to be formed. and

alliances through which security can be ensured in the region, such as organizations such as the shanghai cooperation organization or brix. eurasian economic cooperation and transition processes in this regard can be considered, and we can work with them through initiatives such as one train, one track. eurasian economic union and others. we face many security challenges, and the most important ones are war, terrorism, extremism, dependent government, and interference by foreign forces. being countries of the region in the internal affairs of the state. we are talking here about the influence on independent governments. which led to

the emergence of serious problems in the form of wars, terrorism, extremism and refusal of constructive cooperation with the countries of the region. i would like to make a few assumptions, because how can we consolidate and strengthen european security and consolidation processes? we must all be engaged in meaningful dialogue. and discuss. on eurasian security and its architecture in order to achieve consensus on all issues of interest to us. we must improve and increase the level of cooperation between the countries of the eurasian region in a wide variety of political, economic and cultural sectors. we must strengthen regional and subregional organizations in order to ensure the security of the members of these

organizations, which are the countries of the eurasian region. relationships between research centers and country forces need to be strengthened. establish effective communication channels between interested parties parties to study issues and propose possible solutions to security threats. thank you for your attention. thank you. thank you very much, thank you very much, well, dear colleagues, our plenary meeting has come to an end, i thank all of you, especially the speakers for the wonderful deep speeches, i managed to quickly monitor the media, other sources, almost all the speeches are divided into quotes, well, that’s basically

what we’re all here for, that’s why thank you all very much. belarus is a country with a lot of history. eight geta pabudova, yana shined to the punishment of mindaug, to the first caranavanam to the punishment to whom our present land appeared. geta kalegium. the educational establishment of the 16th century, the same was the case throughout belarus. adukatsiya was free of charge. we meet unique and remarkable things literally at every step. church of the saints.