seeing without mentioning kyiv. the statement argues that failure to support ukraine would send a terrible signal to russia and the rest of the world about washington's resolve. moreover, such a bill is supposedly bad for israel, the middle east and the national security of the states. algeria today celebrates revolution day with the national holiday, the president of the democratic republic was congratulated by the president of belarus. noted that our countries with rich cultural traditions, strong economies, progressive science and technologies, similar values, which represents a solid basis for strengthening bilateral ties. according to the belarusian leader, further cooperation can be given impetus by the implementation of joint projects with access to the markets of other countries on the african continent. alexander lukashenko also expressed hope for an early meeting with his algerian counterpart for discussion.

the adventure of a foreigner in portugal in lisbon, a russian-speaking azerbaijani tourist wanted to order pomegranate juice in a restaurant, but ended up in the police. it is reported that he i used the language application on my phone to translate the word pomegranate into portuguese, but when communicating with the waiter , the program gave the wrong translation. the employee decided that the visitor was armed with a grenade and called the antarctic expedition to prepare to go to the ice continent . don’t be silent about the details of the upcoming trip in the program, shared the head of the group alexey gaidoshov, the flight is planned tomorrow, this year 13 people will go to antarctica, these are experienced ones. two thresholds of psychological

testing in independent ones, so to speak organizations, this is on the basis of the ministry of emergency situations, on the basis of the scientific and production center for sports, psychologists work with the guys, then there is an in-depth medical examination , including bicycle energy testing, of course, cardiograms, it works, and what is the most difficult thing in the work of polar explorers, what studies are planned for this again, and what does the gnome have to do with it, watch the full version of the conversation on the belarus youtube channel. more information from my colleagues at 15:00 on our air, all the best.

hello, the program sas authorized to announce is on the air, i am its presenter nadezhda sas, greetings. let me remind you that this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of the country and each of us. multipolar world, a new and unsafe reality, is the state ready for it? let's talk about this right after the digest of key events in world politics this week. on october 26-27 , a high -level international conference on eurasian security, realities and prospects in a transforming world was held in minsk. about 120 people took part in the event

representatives of 30 eurasian states, including the minister of foreign affairs of the republic of belarus sergei oleinik, the minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation , sergei lavrov, the minister of foreign affairs of hungary, petr szijjártó, the csto secretary general ima tosmagambetov, the head of a number of socio-political organizations and associations of the countries of the eurasian economic union , representatives of the academic and expert communities of the eu, cis and sco states, a number of important topics were discussed to determine the prospects for the eurasian security in the context of a crisis of changing world economic structures that has become aggravated. contradictions between key players and a sharp decrease in the level of communication between them. issues of global and regional geopolitical prerequisites for eurasian security, economic integration and alignment in favor of a unified eurasian security architecture were considered during special thematic sessions. president of belarus alexander lukashenko held a meeting with the minister of foreign affairs of hungary, peter szijjártó. during the meeting

the leader noted that the european union, along with russia, the usa, china and to some extent india, are strong pillars of the existence of the planet. alexander lukashenko emphasized that belarus, being european , is in favor of the existence of the european union. in addition, the belarusian leader conveyed his best wishes to hungarian prime minister viktor orban. don't forget to convey your best wishes to mr. orban. it’s difficult for us to come there, almost impossible, now, but he can fly in at any time, we’ll talk about serious issues, i think this it will be useful. belarus is ready for any scenario in response to the actions of westerners during the upcoming elections, president of belarus alexander lukashenko stated this at a meeting with russian foreign minister sergei lavrov. the belarusian leader confirmed that the republic of belarus is a reliable ally of the russian federation and

there can be no game in this matter. both russia and belarus are doing a lot today in order to keep not only europe, but also the world from sliding downward. to the most dangerous point, you should know that we will continue to adhere to this line, we are reliable allies of the russian federation , you can also rest assured of this, there can be no game here, since we understand that a lot is at stake, in principle, the survival of our states peoples the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs thanked for the invitation to visit belarus for its initiative. conference on the topic of eurasian security, the timeliness of organizing such a forum , sergei lavrov explained the difficult situation on the european continent, a large and rich natural resources, but under the dictation of the americans, who decided to divide into two camps, just as it was during

the cold war era. after much delay , the president of slovakia agreed to the formation of a new government led by robert fica. known for his sympathies towards russia and negative attitude towards arms supplies to ukraine, fitza, together with his party smer, won the parliamentary elections on september 30. however, under pressure from globalist circles in washington and brussels , the head of state, liberal zuzana caputova, the latter delayed agreeing to the creation of a new cabinet. at the end of the past week , fica took part in a meeting of heads of state and the eu government in brussels, where he presented slovakia’s new course on all key topics, from the migration crisis to the conflict in ukraine. the newly elected prime minister said that slovakia will not provide military assistance to ukraine. it’s better for them to negotiate peace for 10 years than to kill each other for 10 years without any conclusions, he was quoted as saying by the local publication

aktuality. in elections to the swiss parliament the right-wing conservative swiss people's party won. this political force, rarely classified as eurosceptics, received almost 29% of the votes. she strengthened her previous result and was significantly ahead of her closest competitor, the social democratic party. taking into account the fact that conservatives criticized the country's accession to sanctions against russia, considering it a violation of the principle of neutrality, the election results demonstrated this. the desire to stay away from other people's conflicts is shared by many swiss. in addition, it turned out that migration problems concern the population. before a more environmental agenda, the green party received a record low result, losing 11 seats. in general, the elections in switzerland confirmed pan-european trends, the growing popularity of conservative forces opposing the influx of migrants, the dismantling of traditional values ​​and additional

economic costs generated by adherents of the green transition. the left-liberal utopia named after greta thunberg and george soros is causing increasing resistance among the broad masses. lishfu no longer china's defense minister, central television reported, the sixty-five-year-old general who had held the position since march was also stripped of his post as state councilor. the reasons for the official’s dismissal have not been given, and it is also unknown who will now head the military department. lee last appeared in public on august 29, having previously visited russia and belarus. the resignation of the secretary of defense is viewed through the prism of america. lish was under us sanctions in connection with beijing's purchase of combat aircraft from russia. his resignation was confirmed a few days before the opening of the xiangshai defense and security forum, to which a delegation from the pentagon was invited. first

, i would like to remind you that fyodor tyutchev was not only a talented poet, but a successful diplomat, a rare example of a combination of creative nature and bureaucratic streak. this is appropriate. quote these lines of tyutchev’s poem cicero in my program. blessed is he who has entered this world; in his fatal moments, all the good ones called him as an interlocutor. he is a spectator of their high spectacles, he is admitted to their council was, alive, like a celestial being, drinking from the cup of their immortality. and i think it’s unlikely that anyone will dare to argue that we are gifted with precisely this happiness, to live in an era of grandiose changes, they will one way or another affect everyone, and even in the quietest corners of the planet, about when and how the transition from the previous system of international relations to a new one, more fair, but also less predictable , will be discussed in today’s program, i am glad to welcome you, andrei petrovich bogadel,

deputy head of the faculty , is already present in our studio general staff of the armed forces of belarus, candidate of military sciences, hello, hello, nikolai moratovich mizhevich, doctor of economic sciences, director of the center for belarusian studies, institute of europe of the russian academy of sciences, hello, good afternoon, glad to hear from you oleg voloshin, ukrainian politician, candidate of political sciences, oleg , thank you for being with us. i welcome you , hello, according to tradition, we begin the discussion with a quick question, the world will continue to shake for a long time on the same scale as it is now, andrei petrovich, i think that the world will not shake, most likely indefinitely in these conditions, until the issues related specifically, probably to multipolarity or polycentricity, here we also need to define a little about this, from this terminology, what it is, until some real ones are actually defined centers of power that will be able to negotiate. i think that it is unlikely that anyone will be satisfied with what is happening today, but to say that the world that

emerged after the second world war was bad is probably wrong, since no one i haven’t come up with anything better than the united nations organization and the security council, maybe, in all likelihood, these are centers of power that should form, form some kind of local human civilizations, and should do this precisely... nations, precisely in the security council to form this new council, which almost everyone is talking about today. in my opinion, after all, the future will be based on the principles and approaches that were formed after the second world war. oleg, what do you think? i i think that such instability will probably continue for at least another five years, or more, until the end of the decade, and it is unstable.

some individual conflicts, because, let’s not forget that the arab-israeli conflict began well, in the form of a clash between jews and arabs even before the second world war, lasted, began, became very active , after the second the entire bipolar system existed, then everything throughout the entire period of us dominance, now we see another escalation again, it’s not about specific conflicts, and in fact there were enough problems in the name of the bipolar world, the fact is that the system itself, in which we can actually recruit several players, there were two, either one, as the dominant united states, or there will be many, could gather together some specific rules and principles, to agree on something, now there is no such system, the united states itself, as the situation in the middle east also shows, cannot be a decisive provider of security and stability, it is not conflicts are not incapable of resolving, and a new configuration in which a group of states could agree on something has not yet been fully formed, so

there will be enough shaking, in this sense for a long time, even in those situations where it would be possible, like for example, the situation with ukraine, and conflict can be avoided in principle, nikolai maratovich, here they are, the roaring twenties , the menacing twenties, that is, we are coming to understand that this is just the beginning, although sometimes it already seems that armageddon, here it is unfolding before our eyes . i think he's still is just unfolding, clearly the point of conflict maximization has not been passed, we have entered such a stage, indeed , the security council, in general the entire un system, it cannot be an ideal invention for a millennium, but at its stage it played a crucial stabilizing role, let’s imagine a person who graduated from school in minsk in 1953. he’s already

been retiring for a year, yes, he lives in a stable world, where if there are any conflicts, something has flared up somewhere, here somewhere there are arabs and jews, there czechlovakia, hungary, something in the far east , something in the middle east, but overall stability is calm, this period, of course, has been exhausted, yes, and if it was not obvious in 1980, now it is absolutely obvious, how long can this last, well, if we switch to the last century, then the processes that became obvious in the year 23, 923, that germany was not reconciled, that the contradictions in europe were not resolved, that britain was a departing power, and the usa was an incoming one, that i am japan ready to play big empire in the far east, in east asia in general, in southeast asia and even australia

is somehow already seen as one of their own, all these things gave rise to instability, which... by and large , somewhere, well, by the year forty-five forty-eight , it means 20-25 years, which means we have clearly not passed this period yet, well , i want to remind our dear viewers of the historical systems of international relations, what they are, the details in our certificate, this is important. there are five systems of international relations in the world. the first of them , westphalian, originated between the 18th and 16th centuries. over the centuries. its supporters shared the ideas of national cooperation. and the principle of state sovereignty. the second system, vienna, appeared between the end of the napoleonic wars and the first world war. its essence was the balance of power of large european states. versailles-washington - the third system of international relations arose between the two world wars. it was based on the idea of ​​collective security with the participation of the league of nations. fourth,

the yalta-podzdam system was formed shortly before the collapse of the ussr. its main provisions strengthened the bipolarity of the world as a confrontation between capitalist and socialist countries, the un was considered the guarantor of security, and the fifth modern system of international relations appeared after the signing of the warsaw pact, it combines two points of view: according to the first, the global dominance of the united states is recognized, according to the second, the multipolarity of the world . the concept of poles of military-political influence remained for many decades. key to describing the international system, first equilibrium two superpoles, then an attempt to dominate one hyperpole as a reaction to the latest demand for a multipolar world, as the antithesis of hegemony. andrey petrovich, you wanted us to decide on the correct definition of what kind of world is coming, you know, if we look at what poles are in general, if from

the point of view, for example, of spherical trigonometry, then there should be two poles, if from the point of view... if we look at the level of world politics, well, yes, we have a bipolar system formed after the yalta-podzdam agreements, conferences, then there is a bipolar world, today we can talk about multi-polarity or polycentricity, well, we probably need to, but we must clearly understand that the world today has truly changed, the united states is already obvious, it cannot... perform the functions of a policeman, a world gendarme, you remember when donald trump said, we will no longer exercise control over all states, we will no longer perform police functions, we will participate and compete with all states, well, another question is how the united states can compete, we know this, in what form the united states competes and how it happens, so

today it’s probably correct to talk about the political centricity of this world, that is, there is a state. centers that unite around themselves local human civilizations, local , well, so to speak, local human civilizations, that is , there is our common global civilization, and there is a local one, and we will see the same thing, where these key states are, for example, western civilization or western european civilization or american americana, it is clear that they are american-centric, there is a state that... controls activities within its civilization, if we look, for example, east slavic or russian civilization, it was recently accepted that in the russian federation there is a very interesting document called the concept of external security, which says that now the russian federation must be considered, and this is correct, precisely as a state civilization, i think we will return to this definition later, also in this very

region russia exercises control and accordingly the diversity of all these forms is politically the same as chinese, japanese civilization, indian civilization, islamic, latin american and so on, but you look, for example, the same islamic civilization, which state performs a polycentric function, but a centric function, it does not exist, as a result of this it is obvious that within this civilizational formation what is happening is what is happening today is endless, it was a complete surprise when hamas started another intifada in relations with israel , well, yes, maybe at... so the level when this, yes, it was a surprise, but in my opinion, that’s all they knew, they clearly imagined everything, sooner or later it would still burn, the gas strip, hamas, and so on and so forth,

that is, syria, and hezbollah, all of this is in a permanent state, in principle none of these exist, the same most, this concerns african, african civilization, the same thing, look, there is no key state, and today it is with the formation of these key states , centers... of power, and it is possible to form on its basis the security council, where these elementary issues will be resolved precisely within the framework of these states that will form, then it will be possible to solve something on the basis of agreements, but to say that there should be two poles will not solve any problems, and it was correctly said that problems always arose in one simple way, attention , geopolitical configuration of the world, there is a network, unipolarity, bipolarity, multipolarity, it’s so complex, oleg, please, i want to hear your comment , indeed, no matter how cynical it sounds at the moment, there is an opinion that

great powers are interested in local conflicts, local outbreaks , because it is better to fight on another territory, foreign territory, in order to prevent a direct clash, well, the fact is that, in itself, a power confrontation in international relations is an immanent characteristic, just as competition between people and conflicts between people is an immanent characteristic of human society, it is only idealists who believe that each according to his ability, to each according to his needs and we can all be there, all people are brothers and so on, but in fact realists and their history confirms their rightness, suggests simply proceeding from the fact that the state, and what the state is, is a large association of people, if in our ordinary lives we constantly compete with whom we periodically enter into confrontation, and so on, this

despite the fact that there is clear state control, and in every society, then just imagine some kind of conflicts, disputes constantly arise there , from disputes on the roads, to competitions there in offices, enterprises and so on, between people, then what to expect then from large associations of states, where... the system of international law and any international system, by definition , has never been as rigid as a system of rules, such as, for example, a state in relation to its citizens, never in the world there was no such system, such a superstate, or a suprastate , which would be comparable in the degree of influence and authority for all humanity, for example , with the authority there, conditionally, of the state of germany for citizens of germany, the state of the republic of belarus for citizens of belarus, therefore, in principle, we we can just...' a world where confrontation will never turn nuclear, which will mean universal destruction, and any conflicts will be

resolved relatively quickly to one degree or another, they will always be inevitable arise, such is human nature, such is the nature of people, unfortunately, we are all imperfect, we are all sinners, we are all inclined to build our success at the expense of, to one degree or another, subordinating others, so we need to build up until this is the introduction of a threat, the introduction threats to everything. no, in the end we live in a reality where the rules governing the world fizzle out and stop working, it ’s really difficult to argue with this, and the question is what follows from this, what should be done, make efforts to breathe new life to the old rules, create new rules or rely on the self-regulation of certain processes? if we rely on self-regulation, we risk losing humanity as a whole. because with all, with all the imperfections of those rules that were, those post-war agreements after the second world war, they gave us a lot

of peace, well, let’s count, from the fortieth to the present day, many, many, two generations grew up in peace, in peace sky, look what a thing, it’s good and bad, the american political system no longer has people, who... just don’t remember the second world war, but even vietnam is almost gone , they can’t imagine that the united states could lose, but it turns out that they can, and events in the middle east show that they can, if regarding ukraine, there are still possible some, well, let’s say, disputes, but it is obvious that the united states has already lost in the middle east, because biden’s visit, it was so... happened at the wrong time, that there is more, uh, more of a mistake in the american it’s impossible to imagine watering in the near east, and there’s one more thing, a dispute with...

many refuse to accept it as a big conflict, i mean russian-ukrainian relations, here is the arab-israeli question, it somehow involves everyone, firstly, because well, there are a lot of muslims, there are much fewer jews, but they are very- very influential, especially in the financial sector, again in the united states of america, memory. costa was also updated anew within the framework of this conflict, and this, uh, it would seem , should assume that humanity will find some way, but it did not find it in forty years eighth year of an effective path, as it turned out, neither in the next war in 56, nor in the war of sixty-eight, not in the war of seventy-three, nor in the lebanese conflict of eighty-two, now this solution is also not yet visible, which means that some kind of it’s a new system,

but it’s unclear what it is. then, suppose we and the chinese, india and brazil, uh, are ready to recognize the multipolar system, but the main player, the united states of america, is not ready, absolutely not ready, biden just recently the other day he said that we can do it in ukraine at the same time, let’s hear a direct speech, but you see, you have this, a war in israel and a war in ukraine, isn’t this more than the united states can bear at one time? yes, we are the united states, for god's sake, we are the strongest country in history in the history of the whole world, we can participate in both conflicts and maintain our defense capabilities, here you go, such a statement, and really does not correspond to reality the expectations of the united states of america and its new capabilities, because how the world has really changed and control.

the united states in the current conditions is not threatened by anything, they have resolved issues that are necessary in virtually all regions, what was laid down in ancient rome, continued, as they say, today by the same biden, dividing the persecution works flawlessly, they have created such conditions. where the united states begins to distribute exactly this wealth, they determine who to impose sanctions on, from whom to lift sanctions, at what price to buy certain reserves, be it uranium here in russia, or how to influence the prices for oil, in principle today the anglo-saxons, they feel very very comfortable, why? and there are no other entities that can compete with them, china

, yes, but today it... is also such a lone state, yes, today we are beginning to form the sco, brics, and so on, and this is what the americans are beginning to be very, very cautious about , why? while this is still such an organization, it is like a beginner at the stage that it is, first of all, some sprouts there, of course, economic, some political sprouts, well, all this in our world, it must be defended, defended, that is, the military component in any formation, it ’s all the same... and when such an formation as brix, as a military-political bloc, is formed, in this situation, the united states really they will understand that what lies ahead is this multipolar world or multicentric world , today, i repeat once again, they are not threatened by anything, they create instability in the world where necessary, they redistribute these resources, they play the first violin everywhere, it’s all comfortable , this

everything is convenient, tying russia into these conflicts, in fact... isolating it from the western world, creating the conditions and prerequisites for the isolation of china, and look around, quaads, aukuses, the same oceans, all of it has been created, and most importantly, that china today is in such conditions, well, literally two or three states that are around it , with which they do not have any disputes, this is the same pakistan, conditionally nepal, probably mongolia with russia, that’s all, and i think that the united states will do everything to... these organizations, such as brix, they have never been independent and ready to resist in this global let’s pay attention to the world map, where we tried to highlight those states that are members of the north atlantic alliance, and the members of brix are again the key five and those states that want to join it, here oleg, please tell me, what do you think, are those players who

today have unresolved... conflicts, controversial situations, for example, northern and southern korea, taiwan and the people's republic of china understand that the only player interested in that... is the united states of america, well , by the way, i cannot agree with you, well, let's put it this way, well, we want to say that the united states of america is interested in the fact that the middle east is now on fire, so blinkin rushed there like crazy , now biden has arrived, but no, of course, on the contrary, you will understand what a unipolar world is, what dominance is the united states, that is, what connected today the states are the most powerful country in the world, this is not because they incite conflicts everywhere, because they managed to occupy a position based on the results of two world wars that were suicidal for european civilization, the first second based on the results of their own economic development based on the results of the successful functioning of their own political model, based on the results of that they had the highest percentage

of innovations introduced in various fields, including the military, that is, well, let's be objective, the united states for 100 years was the most effective state in world, by all indicators, so it’s not because they are some kind of you know, conditional... oleg, but if we are talking about the fact that the hegemon is no longer a hegemon, the world is multipolar, how can multipolarity exist if the key states decision makers cannot currently sit down at the negotiating table and. agree among themselves and identify the rules and laws by which they will interact in the future, and why do we actually say that the hegemon is not a hegemon for one simple reason, so we say there, russia cannot there is a full-fledged challenge to, say

, the united states or china, but in fact they threw down this challenge, what is a bipolar world? it was a system, let’s remember, this was quite recently, when no one could raise their voice at all, when yeltsin, at the head of russia, was essentially a man who obeyed the americans in everything, when the chinese, by virtue of their having a different political system , but due to the fact that they did not feel strong enough and were not powerful enough economically, they also essentially followed the same the course that the americans were charting. this was one polarity, the american voice in all matters was decisive, determining everywhere always, including in the internal politics of almost every country, is this so now, no, look, roughly speaking, the same as russia would now about nato expansion did not start when the countries of eastern europe joined nato, did not start when the baltic states joined nato, but now the americans cannot force a single country outside the political west

even introduce sanctions against russia, where is this unipolar world, what kind of hegemony is this, but there is no hegemony, they are in the middle east, where yesterday they were the main and only policemen, today they are forced to reckon not only with the interests of russia and china, but even with iran, which just yesterday it was believed that you could just bomb everything, but today they are already afraid to bomb iran , today they already understand that there is already a big war, remember the iraq company, even the europeans were against the invasion of iraq in 2003, the americans didn’t care , they even without european allies could bend everyone, today they run after these allies and persuade them to be at the same time with them, no need, america is strong not because it became strong today, it was strong before, because they were more effective, they were more successful, they were able to create more competitive. the older generation, how did this happen, and now the new generation, including leaders like lukashenko, like putin, like shizen pil,

they do not correct the mistakes of those who allowed the hegemony of the united states back in the middle century, thank you, oleg, it’s difficult even to argue and complement with you. why is the united states not satisfied with the conflict in the middle east today, and what is absolutely stopping it from this conflict ? the issue had to be resolved with the gas sector, it had to be resolved, otherwise it would be endless, how everything turned out well in nagorno-karabakh, yes, in a short time the territorial dispute was resolved, why today, for example, won’t we say that well, let’s go into conspiracy theories, let it be... let’s fight conspiracy theories, why wasn’t this provoked in order to once and for all, for example, to resolve the problem with the gas sector, and by chance there were two aircraft carriers there, by chance biden suddenly arrives, with whom no one meets with the bombing of the hospital, because it is their own fault,

they refused to meet with the one who came to reconcile them, we continue like this, and at the same time a ground or ground operation is being prepared, the troops are being prepared, they are being put into battle order, and time is being gained for the battle slug. the israeli army is not an army that will smear snot, it will establish the order there that they need, and the minister of defense, this dutchman, he said, many are already talking about what is equal to nazism, yes, these are not people, this is an animal, you understand, this is the attitude of the israelis today towards those who are around, you understand, otherwise , what lies ahead, it is clear that israel is preparing for very serious actions and consequences, this is without a doubt, look, as soon as it began, they immediately, well, of course, there, when with hezbollah, they have a certain area of ​​​​terrain where they shoot all the time that some are second to justify their confrontation, but they raised aircraft and again attacked targets in syria.

they showed again, as if at the level of strategic deterrence, that they are ready to wage a war not on one, but on two fronts, and the west successfully supported this, everyone understands, and iran, with only distant echoes, begins to say: “we are categorically against, we, uh, express some kind of concern, and so on and so forth, but in reality today the power is on the side of the west and , most importantly, the initiative is on the side of the west, and it is needed.” turn it around in any situation it is necessary to actively overcome, otherwise the west will do all this , use all these contradictions, and use , i think, very very competently in its own interests, i am not ready to discuss the issue of the arab-israeli conflict, since it is still related to our topic of multipolarity has a relative relationship, i just wanted to say that the americans haven’t been able to do a lot of things for a long time, attempts to quarrel... india and china, what have they led to? to

the fact that they have a territorial dispute, and high in the mountains there are indian, chinese soldiers with wooden sticks , from time to time they start fights with each other on these wooden sticks, in addition, they throw stones, the question arises, why don’t they at least have flintlock guns? they don’t have everything, including nuclear weapons, but a certain outlet for emotions in a four-tier theater , they achieve this way, this is what the americans achieved, india has its own party, china has its own, but neither one nor the other, this is not american line, it’s just that china has it quite openly, anti-american, and india is just playing itself, but is not ready take a pro-american position. well, going back to the very distant past, here is

ancient rome, a sophisticated civilization. and already the barbarians, the ancient germanic tribes, were knocking on the gates at the moment when the tribunes in rome said that rome in general is, well, the center of the world, that rome cannot have enemies, that rome is first forever, that after rome there will be nothing. and during one of these performances, everything ended, instead of that rome, italy had not been there for more than a thousand years, not to mention that truly great roman empire, and one day it might happen to any empire, including the american one, because in a multipolar environment you are not able to call even each of them; you can call moscow, you

can call beijing, and who will you call in the middle east if you called tehran , that means they will howl in ankara, and if you called ankara, it means they will be unhappy in tehran , you will solve problems with argentina in latin america, which means you most likely quarreled with brazil, if you play on the side of brazil, you will have problems with chile, and at some stage, it’s impossible to name a year here, americans simply don’t have enough fingers to cover the keyboard, because each key already wants to live its own life, even in the middle east they declare a proto-state formation, but we don’t want to see the president of the united states when this is possible was heard, we don’t want to see, but you have to kneel to the gangway.

and you don’t want to see him, it means something is wrong in your kingdom, if they don’t want to see you, i remind you that on the air of the program sas is authorized to declare the multipolar world what it is like, he doesn’t talk about it the president of the russian federation, vladimir putin, just expressed his opinion in a recent interview, let’s hear direct speech, multipolar. is created by itself in fact and it occurs in connection with the growing potential of many countries. including and not least with the growing potential of the chinese people's republics. india is growing, asia is growing, indonesia is growing, many other countries are growing in latin america, brazil, russia is getting on its feet and getting stronger. and i repeat once again, this is

a manifestation of the objective process of the formation of a multipolar world, no one wants to be in some kind of supporting cast. everyone wants equal relations and they see, if they join brix, that within the framework of expansion, within the framework of strengthening this format, these are the relations between countries, we can achieve this goal faster on the basis of joining efforts, on the basis of joint efforts, that’s really what today states. those who have not yet lost their sovereignty are delighted. and here is the russian federation today and the republic of belarus. compared to what is happening in europe today, the european union, it could be one of if i had not sold the key players, i would not have completely given up my sovereignty, especially in recent years. you know, everything

is happening against the backdrop of the events that are taking place in ukraine today. that is, confrontation. and the confrontation between the west, it clearly defined who is for whom, these are the first conditional two poles in everything, where we are hostile, as in the song, this is exactly the problem associated with europe, it still lays down confrontation in this europe for the future in any case with the east, that is , this west-east axis, it is also, as they say, it hasn’t outlived its usefulness until the global north and global... it hasn’t outlived its usefulness yet, and here look how skillfully and competently the west is starting again, there is a war with ukraine, it’s clear, here a priori they talked about it and are talking about it and will talk about it anyway, the war will be lost by ukraine, as a sovereign state, without any doubt, when it freezes and unfreezes there, it will go on for decades,

but still ukraine, it will belong to this russian world, without any doubt, because it refers to this russian world, no matter how much this... those who present there today a completely different ideology would like it, but look how the west begins to act in these conditions, it begins to divide the already existing european union, the existing nato bloc into more blocs, which in the future able to resist russia without the entry of these global forces, such as britain, for example, the united states and even that same france, today, for example, we see the formation of... a sea led by poland, while it is there some supposedly economic union, but in the end, we understand that any economic union sooner or later still becomes military-political, then britain, and this part, it is entirely controlled by the united states and this is evidence that where this part of the tri-moria is located, the presence of

american military bases , the presence of appropriate advisers, task forces, various headquarters and so on, this is the second element - this is what great britain controls. this is such a new union or, well, you can say an formation like jeff, these are the forces that are called the joint, expeditionary forces, led by great britain, and it also includes about ten countries, this includes scandinavia, this includes the entire baltic region, denmark, the netherlands, and even iceland was brought there, you know, these are the formations that at one time or another can as a military force, to influence this russian federation. yes, that is, as the main rival, let’s just try to even predict, that is, there are different approaches, that is, what could happen in that or another situation, that is, there is a forecast that allows us to look at the goals that have been set and how this will be achieved, we take absolutely all the concepts, military strategies,

doctrines that have been adopted in the west, at the core it is clear, this is the strategy of the national us security, which influenced the same nato strategy and so on. until 2030 they have clearly defined enemy number one, who must be dealt with, this is the russian federation, they also say for the first time the republic of belarus for the long-term in the future, china has been identified there, so by 2030 it is necessary to deal with such an enemy as the russian federation, almost all of their documents, all legal acts say this, therefore, in this period of time, what is now being done in ukraine, then, that then for some reason it can build up in general is no longer visible in russia, it all left, first to help israel, now it is moving to another. instead of helping the next state, which is why it is necessary, of course, to say that predictively they

these states will try to either uh, completely neutralize, or in the worst case, perhaps, destroy in some way, fragment, and no one hides their consequences about this, if we, on the contrary , go from what to extrapolate to the future, then we also see , what the same poland represented in retrospect, what in retrospect it represented... these are those colonial conquests, this is the confrontation with the russian world, which also fits into this general concept. andrey petrovich, but you know what else is important? please note that we are accustomed to perceiving europe as the losing part, but the globalist-liberal ideas that were quite actively imposed, they led to the fact that right-wing parties are becoming quite popular in the current situation. and the european union is gradually waking up in a number of states; not so long ago , an open

discussion was held in the european parliament on the way to achieve peace in ukraine, the role of the eu. it was attended by member of the european parliament from germany maximilian cra, from france and representing belgium marseille de grave. let's hear an excerpt of this discussion and analyze it. please. this is a fundamental choice. between the forces of peace and the forces of war. and i hope that now we can bring a quick conclusion to the situation in ukraine and end this whole path to hell, because otherwise, in the coming decades, we will see a lot of blood, poverty, and we generally cannot be sure that europe will exist until the middle of the century , if we don't set these. warmongers who now hold the power of tiri, well, like my colleague, i think the most important thing is peace,

first of all, this is peace for those unfortunate people who are dying now, let’s not forget about them, again i repeat, in this parliament it is very easy for us to just vote, but i remember what happened in france, during the spanish civil war before the second world war, i remember that many politicians simply participated in the battles on both sides. and now politicians just go to television studios and promote war, and here everything is the same, there is one, do you know one, at least a politician, who votes for war and who would like to advance this situation, there are no such people, we have some very young man, perhaps, and we want to stop this tragicomedy for russia, for ukraine, we want to find a way to achieve it.

preserving peace, but for russia and for europe they are also necessary , we need to stop so that we are not swallowed up by the politics of mr. zelsky, it scares me how in france everyone is waiting for his speech, like the speech of the pope, okay, you want money, we will give would you like some money, please, if mr. zelsky if he were a politician in our country, he would already be in prison, everyone forgets that this is quite happening here, sorry, i can’t tell you this, it’s prohibited, i hope you’ll cut it out later during editing, a very frank and honest discussion and i can’t even believe that it is happening today within the walls of the european parliament, the voices of adequate european politicians are heard today, there are not many of them, but they exist, it is happening, yes, i recognize these premises, it is happening in strasbourg, it is happening, but

it is not very influences current policy, france and the european union , there are such people, there are many more of them than it might seem to mr. zelensky and his supporters, but their voices, well, are drowned out, yes, it’s like shouting out of a refrigerator, it’s almost impossible. for now, but the further the situation in the ukrainian direction develops, the more such people there will be, and i wanted to answer your question about countries that are, i would say, fully realizing themselves with dignity in a multipolar world. when the lithuanian foreign minister says that belarus is in isolation, i have i get the feeling that he’s delusional, because, well, it’s not that big of a deal to go to the website of the ministry of foreign affairs of belarus

and see the scale of contacts with almost all the poles that were on your map in the studio, with almost everyone, but well you can, of course, close your eyes, climb into the refrigerator and talk about lukashenko coming to putin, lukashenko coming to china and that’s all, by the way, even if that’s the case, then this is already a lot, but we see the widest circle, work foreign ministry delta america, please. “asian countries, please, the middle east had very significant contacts, latin america is largely a new region for the republic, we are working , which means it turns out that it is not a multi-vector approach, but a focus on one boss, this is precisely the lithuanian story, and not

the belarusian one at all , this is an attempt to blame." the problem is that you don’t do it for obvious reasons, it’s impossible, yes, you don’t do it, it’s very typical, so not only for russia and china, a multipolar world is reality, if the state is small, well, at least not as big as russia or china, it may well follow the path of multipolarity, by the way, the example here is not only the republic of belarus, please, even being in nato you can... voice quite healthy and sober thoughts on what, for example, the hungarian leader is doing? yes, he cannot jump out of the leash in which his predecessors put hungary, but at least he is already in this cart trying to force his neighbors, so to speak, to pay attention

the fact that we are going to the wrong place, in our times already... a lot, i hope, and the situation with the recent elections in slovakia, yes, this, you know, front of adequate people will also strengthen, oleg, you agree with what you heard, because like the words that we heard from maximilian kra, from tiri marijani, they are indeed completely opposite to the statements that are present in the european media and the understanding that the conflict is in ukraine. it is necessary to complete the understanding that peace will alienate all participants in this conflict from sufficient happy, but successful existence in the next 100 years, and enough, you know how to even say, with irony, even with a little mockery, the words of tiri marijani, how the french react to zelensky, but still they understand everything perfectly, and this is hysteria , and this is

constant begging, that is, even europe. does he actually understand what place he occupies in the sun and who is worth what in this world? well , you know, in fact, because in fact this whole tragic story for the ukrainian people, which began earlier, but reached its culmination in the last year and a half, it essentially became the last nail, as if in the coffin of total domination, another thing is that the new system has not yet been built, this is the time, really, and most importantly... the important thing is that the united states and the atlanticists , their fans there in europe have not yet recognized that this world has changed , that is, what the fight is going on now, for the united states, because this is a very important point, which is often made in these discussions of multipolarity, speech doesn't go about to defeat the usa, yes, that is, to achieve their collapse there, collapse, i don’t know

, there is something else there, or let’s say, even the european union, i said correctly in this sense... the european union and there its collapse and so on, we are talking about creating a system where on issues such as the ukrainian issue or the palestinian issue, or the north korean issue or any other issue, or issues common to all humanity, global warming there, and so on, like european worked. oleg, by the way, we have prepared a caricature of the european concert, please display it on the screen, is this a system similar to the one they want to build at the moment? yes, this is what it looks like, we’ll show you clearly, yes, continue, oleg, please, yes, well, you see, this again, fights happened, but what gave

it was a european concert - this is a product of the vienna system of international relations, 815 to 1914 , and at that time, for the first time in the history of mankind, europe did not know a single major war, by the way, to be honest, the number of conflicts was probably even less than... for example, now , yes, that is, in this sense, that as the european concert worked, some kind of situation arises, the greeks rebelled against the ottoman empire, they want to secede, achieve their independence, 1800 there 21 years , or the same story with the serbs, as it happens, all the states recognized as great powers gather, great britain, france, prussia, austria, the austrian empire, then austria-hungary, naturally. russia, are discussing how we will get out of this conflict, even if some country from these great powers do not have a direct interest in specific history, it is always invited, for example, in 1860, if i am not mistaken, there was a large conference in berlin on

africa, yes, where they divided the colonies in africa, spheres of influence in africa, again i did not i say that it was good, but it was an era when we europeans ruled the whole world, and we, due to our conflicts, then lost this control of the world, and so everyone gathers in berlin, including russia, which has no stake in africa and did not have no claim to them including for example austria-wensburg, which is exactly why, because they are great powers, status obliges, that’s exactly what is being achieved today - leaders like putin, kakinpen and so on, on any issue if it arises, everyone gathers, but the key voice of the country that is located in a particular region, on issues of, say, the southern caucasus, belarus , ukraine, the key vote is for moscow, and on issues... the key voice there will be for iran, turkey and saudi arabia, on issues of the western hemisphere key voice behind the united states and brazil, well, everyone participates

in all the discussions, but it’s not like the americans are deciding the situation with ukraine, a country right on the borders of russia that was just yesterday, that had a common capital in moscow, even without discussion with moscow, it’s even imaginable this is impossible, but today russia is changing this situation, the european union believes that we are opponents of the european union , belarus. you know, we are not vindictive people and despite the current turbulence in the european union, the sanctions that the european union is introducing against us. you should know what the president of belarus is. preserving the european union, not because i really love the european union, because the european union , together with the usa, china, well, maybe russia and india, to some extent, are strong

pillars of our existence on our planet, and if this pillar is wrested from under this system, it will be very bad for everyone, we really want the european union to be powerful and strong. should know that with all the nuances in relations and even the policy that the union is pursuing in relations with belarus today, we are supporters union. we are finishing our discussion, so the final word of today’s program , i present 30 seconds to each participant, nikolai, please, the main thing that our viewers in the republic of belarus should hear is that everything depends not only on the undoubtedly great powers.