from the inside and this is not something else, yaksemia lebedeva was with you, see you in the next program. we will tell you how faith in god helps you find peace and peace of mind. the most important healing of the human soul is taking place, a person comes with his pain, leaves it here and goes out into the world completely different. let's learn how to pray correctly.

we need to ask and tear apart faith, from the languid overhang and from the deep doorway. it is necessary to search for god's mercy and blessings. let's think about it when help comes to a person from above, because if we are looking for god’s help, the intercession of the most pure virgin, then we ourselves must give it to the lord. your love, faith, make efforts to fulfill the gospel commandments. together with you, we will try to find answers to various questions of spiritual life. what is my spiritual homeland? yes, based on what premises i analyze certain religious phenomena. and what is it? secularism? yes, this is secularism, this is spirituality, this is an opportunity for spiritual growth. see spiritual and educational projects. in our

studio, 100 brave children gathered, each of them has a question for an adult, can we children be wiser in some ways than adults? i think so, and i don’t even doubt it at all, how can you get on television these days? it’s very simple, you have good data, i like a girl, tell me how i can confess my love to her without words, the heroes of the program will have to open up to the audience, i met my husband at a sports competition, we have been living with him for 39 years, what about you i liked it, i didn’t like it at first, we fought at school, including me, in kindergarten, even in my opinion, they separated us from corners, the main task is to honestly answer all the original, and sometimes uncomfortable questions, politics is a dirty business, sometimes yes, unfortunately,

your wife is the president’s press secretary, and you are a representative of the television company, which of you is more important, at work or at home, has anyone tried to take advantage of your acquaintance to resolve the issue of cronyism, see the project 100 questions for adults on the belarus 24 tv channel my name is igor tur, this is my propaganda, let's begin. last week was very busy for the head of state, so attempts to talk about everything are obviously doomed to failure, so today i will outline only a few of alexander lukashenko’s theses, which i subjectively consider the most important, i will not start with the international agenda, although the president met with a representative of russia , that is, sergei lavrov, and the representative of the west , that is, the minister of foreign affairs of hungary seyart, on friday, answering questions from journalists, he spoke about palestine with israel , about poland, lithuania, the usa, and of course ukraine,

it would be wrong if our internal affairs were in the shadow of our peacekeeping role on the planet. my logic here is quite simple: we can do something to help the world find peace only if we ourselves have order at home, because if we suddenly have a mess, then we will not have any time left for the world’s problems, no strength. so, on friday, alexander grigorievich in the new outskirts, which is on the second ring road around minsk, watched how his simple order was fulfilled: to build one-story houses without unnecessary paperwork and excessive approval procedures, because all this costs money, all this is naturally included in the cost per square meter for the end consumer. regarding how we carried out the assignments, the houses and even cottages that we saw right away, yes, we immediately want to buy them, including because they do not cost as much as an airplane, and the price per square is about $800. in general , a lot was said about the price and prices, because of the development. of which

there are many in the new outskirts from all over the country, they would naturally like to produce something for the amount x, sell it as expensively as possible, if on the market it costs 2x, or even three, but these developers were offered the prospect of getting into a colossal state order, they were limited in price. i have reason to believe that the price will limit the customer who will sell these houses to the public. why was it limited? quote from alexander lukashenko. well, there is no need to profit from people. we also keep prices and limit them. don't profit from people. perhaps this is the basis of all work rules in belarus, which relate to both the public sector and the private it is clear that in some places this is done better, in others it is done worse, since such instruments as presidential decrees appear on limiting revenues, or , for example, impromptu meetings about the obscure bureaucracy and that same red tape, but in general, do not profit from people

, here i would add the fight against excessive intermediation, because as practice shows, it is the intermediaries who make the most money from people, which, in my opinion, the president is achieving with the example of these very houses, here is a house that... $70,000 on the market, where prices are formed not exactly chaotically , but without a strong regulatory role of the state, and if you open real estate websites, then approximately the same house in terms of footage, in terms of execution, plus or minus the same distance from minsk, it costs at least 150,000, when on such a market an offer comes in at half the cost, a large number of subjects of the sale have an understandable burning desire to earn more, a developer from the conditional brest, who... can, as has already been established, build a house for 70,000, thinks i’ll throw in at least ten from above, i see completely different prices on the market, the customer, even the state one, having received a house for 80,000, also looks at the market and thinks, why should i sell for 80, when i can easily sell for 100, because the market is still much more expensive,

and then comes, say, a businessman-intermediary, who this house, and frankly, 10-20 of these houses will be bought for cash here now at a price of 100,000 , and tomorrow they will put them up for... sale at the market price, that is, at 150, having earned another 1 million for myself, it turns out standard the problem of a market economy, a house whose cost price is 70,000, it is, in principle, available, if not to all citizens, then to many , but the market doubles its value, or even triples it, and this house is bought as a second or third by either the rich layer, or foreigners, or those who really want houses , they start to pull off some kind of schemes, that is, steal, does this mean that everyone should sell everything for... cost price, of course not, the developer needs to make money, but not profit, this two very different words, 5% of revenue and 20, here there is a difference, and the contractor also needs to earn money, no one is against it, but don’t profit, and why there is an intermediary in the person of a businessman who buys for a ruble and sells for three is not clear to anyone except

the businessman himself, his motive is clear, absolutely, in my opinion, the president is not against everyone making money, but he is against anyone making money; let’s look at these same houses in the new okolitsa from the other side, while 228 such cottages are being built here, but there will be more if the experience turns out to be positive, then the same villages with such state developers will build houses not only in podminsk, but throughout the country, when offers for 70-80,000 flood into the market, then no one will sell the same ones at the old market price, that is, for 150, when one-story buildings come to the market and the state thoroughly authoritarianly restrained prices, then hundreds, or even 1000 houses at a price of 70 will break the entire market and the prices for other houses from private developers will also creep down, no one will buy houses for 150, even if we assume that they are a little better, but the maximum the bar for the cost of their sale will decrease, 140, 130, 120, 100, and houses will become truly affordable.

alexander lukashenko has been saying very often lately: we are doing a lot not for us, but for our children, what is it, in the new outskirts the president told me personally, even if you don’t need this house, then... your children will need it so that they do not live in these human settlements. the head of state, as a person from a village, is sure that his house is a house, it is not an apartment, he calls on all belarusians to buy plots, build houses or buy ready-made ones, but he not only encourages, but he personally does a lot to ensure that all belarusians want and are able to do this. a plot of land somewhere far from a large city can be bought for pennies, old houses are being put into circulation, infrastructure is being created in villages, agricultural towns and villages so that it is really... comfortable to live in your own home, and it seems that this is the order of the president on the new outskirts - this is initiative dumping on the market from the head of state; as for me, he planned to make sure that current belarusians they understood the advantage of living not in big cities; if they didn’t move to the village,

they at least had a house somewhere in the village, not for themselves, but for their children. i have never lived in a private house, my parents always lived in an apartment, but every summer my children are connected with the village of studenitsa in the myadel region, where my grandparents lived, the village gave me a real childhood, huts in the trees, fishing in planting, cucumbers picked from the garden, riding a horse, going to the river for berries for hundreds of kilometers on a bicycle. the village made me more mature, because in the village people of all ages are given some kind of responsibilities around the house. now i have my own children who live in the city, i would not want all this, they were deprived of tablets with smartphones, entertainment centers and so on, the joys of a big city, this is of course very good, but i had a real childhood in the village, and with calls to buy houses, alexander grigorievich, as for me, is trying to make sure that all the children in the country have at least a little bit of this real childhood in

the village. about children on friday the president said: “something else very important, a wonderful question for the head of state, from a colleague, i will show in full, and then the main thing from the answer. it is clear that sooner or later the west and the east will sit down at the negotiating chair, but it is not a fact whether kiev will take part in them, but i think that belarus will probably be there, but we remember all the minsk agreements, we remember how we agreed here, and then declared that for..." it was just an attempt to gain time to pump kiev up with weapons and it’s better to prepare him for war, so here’s a question for you, are you ready to sit down at the negotiating table with western forces, sign some documents, shake their hands, and most importantly, are you ready to believe them? i’m not going to trust anyone, if it were my house or me personally, i would believe, but about 10 million people, fate, people, children and so on, somehow i can believe, the facts are on... the table, like me i often say, only practice, no promises , shake hands, i never refuse, but

shake hands with everyone who comes to us in peace, who is not in their bosom or in this hand stone, please, we are ready to work in this direction, they never treated us well, and they don’t, we believed them, and if we didn’t believe them, we always met halfway, we, the russians and the same ukrainians extended our hand , in slavic, so what? and they threw stones at us, well, we are ready to step over this, we must look forward through this, because this does not concern us, this concerns you and your children, so we must be able to step over this and move forward, negotiate, we will ready for this, how many what is important in these words of alexander grigorievich, because sometimes from other people, high-level officials, and fellow journalists, bloggers, and simply from caring people, i hear that the west, they

are all traitors, in runes, they have terrible propaganda, other people’s values ​​and so on, and the bottom line is, we wouldn’t have to have anything to do with them at all, purely from a human point of view, everything seems to be correct what these people say, and i think so, if in human terms towards them, then let them everyone walked into the garden together, but the statesman, right down to the president, or rather starting from him, must be guided not by personal... feelings of something, but by the state interests of the country and its citizens. let's use the same example: alexander lukashenko received german chancellor merkel, the president of france and poroshenko in minsk. he believed them when they agreed on ukraine. they deceived him. from a purely human perspective, alexander grigorievich has more than enough reasons not to communicate with westerners, not to trust them and not to shake hands. the same applies to the leadership of aggressive poland. management ridiculously aggressive lithuania and even funny ukraine, purely humanly, let’s say, i

really admit that alexander lukashenko can’t stand them all, and not shaking hands is the softest manifestation of a human attitude towards them, but if necessary for the interests of the country's interests are not immediate, but long-term, the president will be ready to sit down at the negotiating table with anyone, because that is his job, to be president, and this means that the personal perception of someone is secondary. september 17... last year national unity day, quote head of state: personal aside, only the people, only the state, it is precisely this principle that the president himself is guided by, it is only necessary that everyone not only hears him, but understands him, and the point is absolutely not about maintaining power, which, of course, will definitely be written about or the runaways and their propaganda will say, after three decades in power, after a successfully repelled coup attempt in the years when, despite everything, we do not see a war in our home, and the state itself is increasingly telling the younger generation you will soon take over the country and carry

responsibility for it, so alexander lukashenko can absolutely close the western border , isolate himself from ideological opponents and not pick up the phone when representatives of unfriendly states call, and if he picks up the phone, then only in order to tell them everything in a humane way, what he thinks about them, while lukashenko is in power, all this will no longer... have no impact on the country, it’s somehow very negative, because the current president already has a successfully rebuilt the economy, together with now a slightly different, but multi-vector policy, but if it is... necessary, alexander grigorievich, as always , will put the interests of the country and state above his personal relationship, to anyone , to anything, polish the authorities have broken things in our direction, lukashenko still comes into contact with them, calls for the return of friendship, the same applies to france and germany, and great britain and the united states, so it seems to me that there is great delight in communicating with them,

alexander lukashenko, remembering all their antics and personally against himself, all the difficulties that they were: thrown up and which took a lot of effort, time and nerves, the president does not feel any delight in communicating with them, to put it mildly, but when the country needs it, he picks up the phone and negotiates, if the country needs it, he will forget grievances, at least in public rhetoric, smile, joke if necessary, shake hands if he considers it necessary, not for himself and not for the country under him, but for the future belarus that will come after him, what is the difference between a politician and state statesman, a politician thinks about future elections, a statesman thinks about future generations, and if necessary, as a statesman, like alexander lukashenko, should do, for example, vladimir putin or sidin pin, they are also not politicians, they are statesmen. another quote from the president, already on july 6 of this year, about politics: it’s one thing to express it to the whole world, but another thing is what’s inside you, that’s his

job, which sometimes doesn’t coincide with his personal life. on tuesday, at the anniversary of the palace of independence, alexander grigorievich said. the following: i don't i love, frankly speaking, i don’t like palaces, but our state should have had such a symbol, a symbol of our sovereignty and independence. lukashenko, who has been personally traveling to factories, farms, and fields for three decades, who works quite comfortably at off-site meetings, somewhere in the executive committee or in a large office at an ordinary enterprise, who lives in, believe me, a very modest residence near minsk, it is there, in his office, where he is calm and comfortable and prefers to work, that he builds a palace of independence, for what? fools from the opposition and just fools, scream and will scream that it was the dictator who built his mansions, mansions that he really can’t stand, and the palace of independence was built not for him or for anyone, but for something , more for foreign

policy, let’s use a well-known example, the white house in the usa, which already has a sacred image, not because the us president works there. presidents come and go, but the white house remains, because the white house is a symbol of power in the country, whoever is in the white house is the power in the country, and if there is someone in the country the main thing is that there really is power in the country, and if there is power in the country , then it is sovereign and independently makes decisions based on its national interests, which everyone in the world is forced to take into account, that is the meaning of the white house, this is a bright visual declaration of the country’s sovereignty world arena, exactly the same applies to the kremlin in russia, putin could have built himself any other residence, because as a person who has been to the kremlin many times, i can’t say that the historical kremlin is convenient for work today, but the kremlin is a symbol of power in russia, whoever is in the kremlin is in charge. the kremlin is sovereignty, the fall of the kremlin alone means the fall of russia’s sovereignty,

in exactly the same way, the fall of the white house means the loss of us sovereignty, which americans love to make their disaster films about. the kremlin and the white house will always be defended by any means necessary, not because there are presidents there, but because it is a symbol of sovereignty on the world stage, a symbol of strength and independent decisions. belarus has such there was no symbol. this is the essence of the construction of the palace of independence. alexander grigorievich would have easily continued to work in the administration building for karl marx, as well as in his office in his village. but the country needed a symbol of sovereignty, because this symbol most clearly... declares our independent policy on the external contour. when we built the palace of independence, we got our own kremlin or our own white house. this is a signal to the whole world, clear and understandable, because it is so accepted in the world: look, planet, we are belarus, a symbol of our independent politicians, our palace of independence , our power is here, which means there is

power in our country, and you will always be forced to reckon with our opinion, with the opinion that they symbolize and declare. our palace of independence to the world, vladimir putin advised alexander lukashenko to work in it at one time, i dare to suggest that not because it is convenient, this is not the primary thought of the russian president, that belarus 10 years ago had its own kremlin, its a symbol of sovereignty, and the main one should be in the kremlin, i think, putin this is exactly what i meant. i say, as you didn’t even think, the independence palace was created to carry out some... and so on , he says, no, if i were you, i would work here, it’s decent here, i say, okay, i ’ll think about it, just now the president’s friday words about the arab-israeli conflict, which is essentially a war. lukashenko’s enemies tried to scold him for a couple of days, asking why he was silent. to begin with, he was silent because he was doing business and not

ranting. but the fact that lukashenko will say this and that’s exactly how he treats to the events in the middle east, and so it was, everything is clear to everyone. this is a problem. the americans sensed a change in the situation in the world, multipolarity, etc., they really don’t need it. how can you resist? so they are trying, as usual, to set fire to these places in the war, or maybe the third world war, it can start from there, there is only one way out, we need to create a palestinian state, since a decision was made in forty-seven, what about us? we drove people underground and demand that they shout hurray, hurray, you israelis are great, you’re right. lukashenko says that world war iii may break out. although half an hour ago he was assessing newly built houses for belarusians, this means that he is confident that he can protect the country from war, otherwise, why build, or why show it so widely. it seems to me that

the call to build houses is also the education of patriotism and love for one’s own; if suddenly there is war, then everyone will be ready to defend their home, their personal fortress and the fortress of their family, without sparing themselves. i doubt whether people will also zealously defend their apartments in a conventional fifteen-story building. as i say, perhaps the more people in the country live in their own houses, the more they will treat the whole country as their common home, also defending it if necessary, without sparing themselves; maybe the mass construction of such houses is a strategic element of the state’s defense, think about it, my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda.

we will introduce you to the belarusians who deliberately exchanged the city for the village , at that time we already had two horses of our own, they were standing in a stable near minsk, we had an idea, that is, first of all, moving from city to village, to try to do something of their own, they believed. 53-55 fruit-bearing garden and 45 currants, the leader from the capital will have to experience all the delights of rural life, she eats the rope, it’s normal, it happens, grisha, be a man, come on, let’s go to the apple farm, they said. everything is modern there, almost nothing needs to be done, it will be, they said, you know, i was joking, but he took everything seriously, i am a project from the village,

watch on the belarus 24 tv channel, the belarus 24 tv channel is broadcasting for you round day, do not switch, our daily task is to talk about belarus, the country abroad . more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to watch projects from our tv channel. so what is belarus like? business and developing, hospitable, bright and festival.

generous, picturesque and monumental, athletic and team-oriented. we tell you not only about significant events, we introduce you to active, energetic, inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development. belarus can be different to to understand and feel it, you need to see it with your own eyes. hello, dear tv viewers, belarus 24 tv channel is on air, watch us every day, because we make belarus.