for capital, large families can pay early. news, analytics, expert comments and interesting facts: watch the events program on thursdays on the belarus 24 tv channel . when we come to work, we are a bridge builder. with our work, with our creativity, we establish connections, bridges, that allow us to ensure peace and the well-being of our country. i was born in the chuchensky district, the village of zachepichi, grodno region, where i graduated from nine classes, my mother considered some of my abilities in construction and sent me to study at the grodno polytechnic technical school with my mother.

you bet mom always sees the right one and makes the right decision, so i think it was the right decision , i’ve been in this profession since 1998, that’s about 25 years, during this time a lot of large and small objects have been passed, all of them significant , we took part in reconstructions throughout the republic, last year we came up with a major overhaul of the bridge across the nyomon river on the street... sopovich, where we are now, as far as the president’s task was set for us to repair this object, we completed this task in the shortest possible time. the responsibilities of my position include ensuring control of the entire construction process, compliance with the requirements of regulatory documents , well, ensuring the quality of work, well , when we complete objects and ensure the start of traffic, well... there is some kind of

joy, of course, there is a sense of demand for our profession, because this is for the public, for the country, for the city, for the people, we feel joy and feel that many different objects, good ones, are still waiting for us ahead things to do, let's move on, let's move on. hello viewer, my name is igor, this is my propaganda, let's begin. today i propose to talk about parties, since on friday we talked about this at length and in detail at the palace of independence, together with, naturally, alexander lukashenko. you know, i’ll first note that i’m non-party, i’ll also say honestly that at the moment, this needs to be highlighted in bold, i’m not going to join any party, because once again... at the

moment, let’s once again highlight the parties in bold , which we have and which in theory are very necessary are needed, but right now they do not meet all the criteria for real parties, that is, nominally we have parties, but while they still have to work and work to become truly parties, this is what the president is waiting for, this is what the time requires, and this the fact that, as the meeting showed , both the leaders of these same parties and independent party building specialists are well understood, i am sure that people are also waiting for this. who want their participation in the political life of the country as soon as the parties meet all the necessary criteria, there is a decent queue of people willing to line up for them, more than accepting that in one of these queues you can see me personally, why do we need to strengthen the role of the party in the political life of the country and in general why do we need parties, since the party leaders will not be offended by me, but in the foreseeable past, the influence of the party on anything in belarus has been reduced to a minimum, the most obvious... lukashenko, and this automatically

means that it is necessary to strengthen the role of parties, even if there is no clear understanding, why? but let's speculate. i'll start with a fragment of the president’s speech, in which the head of state describes the form of government in belarus. belarus is a young, sovereign state, our chosen model of governing the country, a presidential republic, optimal for our society. taking into account historical traditions and geopolitical situation. let's take it in order, what is typical for a presidential republic. the three main points are very simplified. first, the president is not elected by parliament, by the people, or by any of the electoral forms; more on this a little later. second, the government is not formed by parliament, and the president. and third, of course, the powers of the president in this system are generally very broad. from the first two points it is obvious that it is cornerstone. the presidential

republic is the relationship between the president and parliament. in a presidential republic , parliament is assigned strictly legislative functionality, that is, the influence of parliament on politics. the life of the country is incomparable to the influence of the president. but if someone turns their nose up at the definition of a presidential republic, saying that it is somehow undemocratic, then i will note that the classical the united states of america is most often cited as an example of a presidential republic. with a slight ironic addition, the president there is elected not by the people, but by the us electoral college, there are 538 of them, so if we suddenly assume that we entrust the right to elect the president to the supreme national assembly, which has up to members, that is, twice as many as in the college us electors, it will be very funny to read their indignation. but since alexander grigorievich said earlier that we have rather an authoritarian control system, which someone else calls a dictatorship, then i dare to say that with the presence of alexander lukashenko as president, we

can talk about a super-presidential republic in belarus, this is when all branches of power are more concentrated in the hands of one leader. actually, this is what we... we see well in the surrounding reality. i dare to suggest that our leader is now preparing the country for the future return of the form of government from a super-presidential republic to a presidential one, where the power of one head of state, the second president of belarus, who will replace lukashenko, would be is still limited. but here i will draw attention to the fact that alexander grigorievich called this form of management optimal for two reasons: historical traditions and geopolitical situation. here's to tradition. it seems like everything is absolutely clear, that’s what concerns our position on the world map, we are geographically right now, and it seems that for many years we are between two pillars of the world order, which are still at the stage of conflict with each other, we are naturally talking about russia and the european union , in the south we have

ukraine, which unfortunately is completely came under the control of the united states of america, just like poland, which is still controlled by washington, china is still on the world map, which has economic and political ambitions and views on the european union market; on the line from beijing to brussels we are there, that is, we are actually in the epicenter of political squabbles among all the world's major hegemons. the role of belarus itself has increased many times in recent years, as the president advised at one time, i do not suffer from globalism, but it is obvious that the issue of belarus for all hegemons in our region is key, everyone wants to drag us to their side, because minsk is a geopolitical trump card in this... confrontation, another thing is that the hegemons want to drag us to themselves mainly in order to strengthen their positions in the fight against the rest, that is, we an important piece on the board, but only a piece, and not the grandmaster himself, and in all this mess, like it or not, we need a presidential republic with a strong leader who

is able to quickly make strong-willed decisions, and if necessary, then almost alone to drag the country with us into the bright and to double-emphasize the sovereign... future, let's imagine that right now we have, god forbid, democracy in its most terrible, although popular, idea, this would mean that in our parliament, whose decisions would be the main ones in country, out of 110 deputies, conditionally 40 would demand to call for peace in the region , but 30 deputies with appropriate support from outside, in the oval hall would demand to send the army to war on the side of russia, another 20 deputies would demand to send the army to a war against russia, 10 more deputies... would propose to invite nato troops to us, the remaining ten could, say, populistly propose, under general noise, to attack lithuania and return our vilna. what i mean is that a democratic body of collegial decision right now would be faced with the worst political mistake, and this is not even a wrong

decision, but the absence of any decision in principle. but nevertheless, alexander lukashenko for the sake of returning belarus from a super-presidential to a presidential republic. is going to strengthen parliament, strengthens political parties for this, and also complements this entire structure with an all-belarusian people's assembly, for what? the new parliament will differ from the current one, i am absolutely sure of this , i know what parliamentarism is and what it means to be a deputy, it will differ in that it will have to take on a greater burden and play a serious role in the future development of the country. to be honest, i can’t even imagine what a big, enlarged role you will have to play. you know, i'm trained to pay special attention to what he says the president after the words, to be honest, because in such cases alexander grigorievich

periodically speaks so frankly that representatives of some classic western cunning politics would choke on their cappuccino with naturally coconut milk. lukashenko. he says quite honestly that they still don’t imagine what kind of big role the strengthened parliament will have to play, exactly the same thing seems to apply to the big role in the future of the strengthened... belarusian people’s assembly, that times will be difficult, after a super-presidential republic, without going to grandma, they will definitely be difficult, the question is how big our difficulties will be, and the task is that the difficulties do not become fatal for the country, but the geopolitical situation in the general world chaos is changing so rapidly that to predict what kind of problem in two, five or 10 years will be the main one for belarus ; therefore, to prepare the system to solve this particular problem is: it is not possible, it could be anything, from any side, so lukashenko, like

i am puzzled that by the time he leaves power, this will happen someday, but god forbid not soon, the country was ready to solve any problem, for this in a presidential republic, after lukashenko there must be a strong president, a strong parliament, a strong veche , that is, vns, this does not mean that all three of these government bodies will be needed and critically important in solving problems, maybe even... and the president and parliament will simply say thank you from the country, it seems to me that alexander grigorievich, as a real leader, does not build the belarus of the future based on his vision, the belarus of the future for him is a strong system of power that, independently, without the supervision of a super-president, will be able to understand itself and line up

. you can gather around yourself, as we say, reliable people, but if they are not professionals, you will immediately become a fool and disgrace yourself in front of people. separately, with regard to political parties, there is the issue of white russia; after re-registration, we still have liberal democrats, that is , goydukevich’s party, and there are still communists. justice labor party. fourth - white russia. the initiator of its creation was

the largest pro-state, public association, belaya rus. naturally, the most logical assumption, which was heard both from lukashenko’s supporters and from his opponents , is that it will be a classic party in power, to the point that when lukashenko ceases to be president, he will definitely become the head of the ruling party, regardless of who positions, real power will remain with him, according to this principle, for example, power was built in poland, where the head of the ruling party, kaczynski, still holds all the power, and by the way, i am not criticizing, this is one of the forms of effective government, this is the place to be, in this assumption that this will be the case in it seems that even everyone has already believed a little in belarus, they say that everything is clear, white russia is the party in power, although lukashenko himself has said many times that this is not so, telling his formula of attitude towards parties, i am neither with the left nor with the right, i'm with the people, in white russia itself in general, they also said that this is not so, that they are not the party in power, but nevertheless, once again on

friday, alexander grigorievich personally said the following to all party leaders: if you can build a system, people will come to you, no, no administrative resource will help , will only do harm, especially at the stage of formation, as for my attitude towards the parties, the leaders who are present here, for me you... anyway, before this alexander grigorievich said that we are not recreating the cpsu and are not building a party in power, as it were someone didn't want it, but wanted it this to someone is generally normal for the political process, but sometimes it contradicts the logic of the state- building process. what is the main task of any party? on friday i listened to the reports of party leaders and smiled if i heard about some kind of education of the population, about improving political culture, power, and so on, all this is very necessary, but this... it’s definitely not the parties that should be doing this, because any party one simple main task is

to fight for power, if you gain power , fight to maintain this power, this is a logical conclusion both from our legislation on parties and from the theory of party building in general. it seems to me that a political party cannot have any other main task, either in theory or in practice. although, in our conditions of a super-presidential republic, we have to fight for power. maybe and should be, to fight for the current power, for its preservation, to be honest, i don’t remember that any parties in the twentieth were strongly and massively harnessed to the president, i’ll only take out the mediar... parties, if only then, when these protest marches were gathering, conditionally the ldpb would have brought teachers and doctors into the streets, showing that they were with lukashenko, and somewhere else the communists would have brought officials and pensioners to the rally, showing that they were for lukashenko, and then also conditionally rpts gathered businessmen and entrepreneurs, of whom there are also many who support lukashenko, then there would be a completely different picture about

state parties , that’s the thing, even based on pragmatism, and not just patriotism, they must... fight hard for the current government, because what if suddenly the current government will lose, that the very next day they will all become parties not pro-state, but opposition, and once in germany, most recently in ukraine, all opposition parties, even if they were some constructive, they were all instantly banned and dissolved, and when you are forbiddenly dissolved, then a priori you cannot fight with anyone for anything, we have four parties and there is a question with whom they need to fight for power, you can’t really fight with the state, but all our parties are supporters of the state course, so the fight became if we were to fight bees against honey, it would also be problematic to fight with opponents from the opposition, because we squeezed out destructive opponents who saw politics as a kind of instrument to destabilize the country, and a constructive position, let’s be honest, has not yet formed in belarus, it is unlikely to form

in any nearest perspective, then the parties will have to fight among themselves, but there is a nuance here, when we have four pro-state parties, there is a great temptation for them to start fighting exclusively for dominant attention from the state, then this will not be a struggle among themselves, but a struggle for attention and resources, both administrative and financial, from government agencies, and this , whatever one may say, leads to the fact that sooner or later in this struggle there will be some kind of winner, and the winner in the struggle for attention from the state, it becomes the party in power, with all that follows, we really cannot form a one-and-a-half party system , a system with one dominant party, this unfortunately leads to the merging of state and party institutions, corruption, and this experience has not been found anywhere successful, as a rule, it ends in growing discontent on the part of the population. even on friday , the topic of party financing was directly touched upon several times: it’s clear that

everyone needs money; it seems logical that if the parties are pro-state, then the state needs it financially. to help those, but as for me to help and support, there are concepts very far from each other, there were also arguments, very sensible, why we need to work out a mechanism for financing the party, so that some oligarchies do not come and buy the party with the fucks, with them and the required percentage of votes in parliament, which would make decisions beneficial not to the country, but to these specific oligarchs, the logic seems to be such that no one buys our parties, we must somehow buy them ourselves, another thing is that nothing... prevents the party oligarchs from buying up, because selling yourself is a one-way ticket, as soon as you sell yourself to someone for the first time, then the only question is the price. an example is ukraine, where lots are resold and rebought by oligarchs mixed with the state on a regular basis. i'll tell you frankly, as a citizen of belarus, i would not like to see people joining the party as a priority, because it is financially

beneficial. in addition, i would understand if the issue of state financing of parties was raised when our parliament was already formed strictly according to party lists, but for now, we will put a barrier to those oligarchs who want to buy the votes of deputies with party funding, for which prevents them from buying up the votes of non-party deputies; according to current legislation, citizens from labor collectives can be nominated as deputies by collecting signatures, that is , purely theoretically, there may not be a single member of any political party in parliament, right, then if we finance... the parties that we finance, why? but what sounded wonderful on friday was that four pro-state parties should not only divide lukashenko’s electorate among themselves, but also work with neutral doubters, and even with constructive authorities. we see their new training manual:

behave even more loyal than the most loyal to the authorities, join parties, but nevertheless, there are repentant people who... are ready to actively cooperate, many of them are politically active, the attempt to organize them through a round table of democratic forces was not entirely successful, and here these four parties that we have should work with them, it seems to me the greatest potential in this regard belongs to the liberal democratic party, the republican justice labor party. in general, party building is a very exciting process, like all politics, so, as the president said, it will be very interesting, although i would like for it to become boring at least for a while and for us to take a breath, but this is unlikely to be expected in the coming years, except that i am glad that alexander grigorievich launches even such extremely important processes with a smile and friendly jokes. it’s better to sit , it’s more comfortable for you, just turn the microphone towards you so that we record everything you say,

just in case, i’ll repeat my comment from the glavny telegram channel. tour, well, how can one live without these jokes? my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda. they are delighted with every corner of malay rodzina. i i drove through this village, walked through the streets and fell in love with those pabudovs who were in the village. this is my favorite place, one might say. i remember where i even caught the first perch, how many i had. joy, as they say in full pants, they know everything about how to run a farm, i had to buy this honey, and i thought, why should i buy it if i’m all

business, i know, now we’ll put in a fresh frame, they, i think, for they’ll take it off for a week and are ready to endlessly find inspiration in the simplest things, this is this leaf, this a symbol of prosperity, napeina, not a single object in belarus has so many attractive agents. negative emotions, watch palishuki’s project on the belarus 24 tv channel, ready for an exciting adventure through the cities of belarus on the banks of one of the cleanest rivers in europe and in the second most honorable city of belarus, gomel, the chernigov and turvopin principalities merged. unique

architectural monuments await you. the famous russian artist georgy lukomsky, visiting the palace in 1913, wrote: this is one of the richest estates in the russian empire. and the most interesting historical facts. karaleva bonasforza, floating piles of land. advedala ragachou, advedala her castle, as she knew here to close the fires, not far away, all and endowed the founders of the castle with various privileges. the photograph measuring 42/94 cm was made using the contact method in 1903, and only four such photographs are known in the world. watch in the program of the city of belarus on the tv channel belarus 24. the skin has its own happiness. we, when we participate in these holidays. we awaken within ourselves our ancestral memory, our own unique history, in childhood there are no days off, that is, in childhood, the child does not wait for saturday on sunday, and

the skin burns with its right and the light changes to the best , your attention adheres to your body, and changes, and your center of weight changes, your breathing changes, your attention changes, now what tool, what tool to unite everyone , here’s a votrovoy... watch the project about belarusians on the belarus 24 tv channel. each program has new heroes, we are bakers by education, we work together at the same enterprise, mood plus in englishcation, higher education , i i will learn the korean language, the korean language , the korean language, yes, unpredictable questions, what were the names of the brothers who were raised by a she-wolf according to legend. so, the obligatory version, chill. on forks, don’t take everything so literally, and unexpected answers to them, maybe it somehow rhymes dimyan, well, not timyan,

but somehow it’s possible, porridge, i don’t know, some kind, this is a sport in which you have to back away i ask, i accept the answer rome, the correct answer, milan, santa maria delegation in milan, build a tower, watch in an intellectual show, the tower on a tv channel belarus.