[000:00:00;00] will love, who will love us, who will pity us, will hold us to their hearts, where is the justice, whoever will love us, this won’t do, this won’t do , oh where are you going, well, you hear what’s happening, but they don’t

love, what are you doing, just be there, so that i know the day has passed, everything is fine with me, everything is fine with you, call as often as possible, write at least once a year, let my share be for good fortune, not for bad luck, call as often as possible, write at least once in the year, let it be... my fate is luck not misfortune, don’t wait for the curse of inertia when spring knocks, so that i my heart said, he needs me too, call as often as possible, write at least once a year, let my participation be for good fortune and not for bad,

call as often as possible. write at least once a year, let there be my participation in happiness, no harm done, hello, i’m listening, anna, it’s you, unfortunately, you made a mistake with the number. please be there so that i know the day has passed, everything is fine with me, everything is fine with you, everything is fine with me, everything is fine with you, everything is fine with you,

everything is fine with you, please! be close,

call sometimes, the phone is the same, it's not difficult, please call, please be there, please, please, please, hello on belarus 1, belarus 24, as always on fridays with a repeat on sunday morning, the editors club program, in our

studio, journalists, political scientists, scientists discuss what the most pressing, loudest topics are being discussed in the country and the world, well, according to tradition, i introduce our guests, the editor-in-chief of belarus today, dmitriysan zhuk. vadim - gigin, general director of the national library, candidate of historical sciences, head of the knowledge society, vadim elfimov, head of the department of social policy and ideology of the academy of government under the president of the republic of belarus, alexey bilyaev, dean of the faculty of journalism of the belarusian state university, candidate of historical sciences, alexey derman , political scientist, already a tv presenter, good evening, well , where do we start, of course, the udkb summit, a very high-profile event, i would like you to share: your opinion, your impressions of what happened, what consequences this will have for regional security in security in general,

belarus, russia, kazakhstan, kyrgyzstan, tajikistan and armenia are included in this structure, the chairmanship was of the republic of belarus and the chairmanship is passing to kazakhstan, i’ll just summarily at the beginning , so i’ll declare what we talked about, because well, of course, you all saw it very well... we’ll do this further, we’ll ask you, the opinion of experts, in the final programs, and we will also work today, what are the main theses, the problematic issue should be resolved at the negotiating table, and not make demarches; if there are complaints against each other, we need to voice them in person, and not throw in estimates , said head of state, we know that this concerns armenia, how many were there when pashinyan was elected, right? in principle, we predicted that this would all end like this, we can also speculate on this topic, for what reason the dkb remains indisputably the first to begin with, remember, it started with demarsh, it started with demmarsh, but

that’s why it was there in general chosen, yes, but you know, with western technologies, by and large for them, if there is no strong leader in the country, there is no strong power, then make sure that your person... becomes power, a matter of technology. the csto remains an integral element of the security of the eurasian region; it is necessary to find a new solution to strengthen the security of the csto countries. we count on the establishment of a sustainable and long-term peace in the southern caucasus; the spark of the conflict in the middle east could ignite the flame of a new world war. the uncontrolled movement of weapons through ukraine is a potential threat to the whole world, but these are already recognized facts, we have seen, among other things, the latest stories with hamas and where weapons were demonstrated western, not ukrainian, western model, but there is a suspicion that it visited ukraine, or maybe it didn’t, maybe under the guise of a delivery, not a suspicion, there were numbers, these deliveries were known, well, i can congratulate

our western partners, we are too they predicted, they talked about it, the west is increasingly trying to crush the whole world , it’s also working out, it’s not working out, let’s talk, or the era is already ending before the polar world, where the west is the hegemon, and the situation in the world is characterized... characterized by a high degree of confrontation and polarization. alexander lukashenko in particular commented on the decision to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus and why this was done, let's listen and start discussing. we have been observing such so-called defensive maneuvers for a long time, since the moment nuclear weapons were removed from belarus in 1996. how it all ended, expansion. nato to the east. training scenario in 2016: delivering a nuclear strike on belarus. please note, on the initiative of the administration, the so-called

nobel peace prize laureate barack obama. moreover, according to the plan of the exercises, belarus was not even involved in the conflict. we can talk a lot about illegal, unilateral coercive measures and military provocations on the border. information sabotage, millions of dollars thrown into the preparation of failed coups. i'm not even talking about the open demonstration of readiness to involve nato forces in this goal. why were b-52 strategic bombers circling near the belarusian border in august 2020? who was the signal sent to? not only belarus, of course. against this background, accusations about the deployment of russian tactical nuclear weapons in our country on our territory are simply absurd, we repeat for the hundredth time we are not threatening anyone, we are simply

learning diplomatic, so-called etiquette from those who made the language of force a global trend, this is the reality of today day, only the presence of powerful weapons guarantees security... in the region and gives the right to vote in the international arena, well, the west itself does not shy away from using force and we probably already know, everyone and i, maybe, i think you we agree that only... force, our western partners understand , the president is right, you know, from this statement that a unipolar world is unfair, that the americans will violate any principles, that they will throw money into destabilizing political regimes around the world, well, we sometimes we also gather here every time, look at what they have come to, but they will not get there yet, it is important that we contrast our clear, clear strategy, so that we demonstrate, if necessary, then strength, most importantly, confidence in in their own strength, that’s why such... the importance of the cst in the west

, where they are trying to say with propaganda methods, yes, this organization, you know, it’s not like that, it’s half-dead, why then is there so much attention to this organization, because although a little after kazakhstan became quieter, quieter, but then they waited out their own, by the way, the same assessments are absolutely right, we talked about remembering when political changes took place in armenia, immediately after that, after the eighteenth year, such assessments from the dkb began to appear immediately, almost simultaneously, when there was an operation in kazakhstan, let me remind you, in january of the twenty-second year of peacekeeping. when i remind you, the cst, which was called a paper tiger, an organization left in the past, agreed on a political decision overnight, quickly transferred forces, including, by the way , with the participation of armenia, all members of the csto, then the opponents were simply taken aback, now is a fundamental moment, the csto remains the only, not the most important, the only factor in ensuring long-term military-political stability in the post-soviet space, moreover. here's ours

partners in central asia and the south caucasus even need this organization more, we have a safety mechanism, we have a union state of russia and belarus, we have a common doctrine, we have tactical nuclear weapons, we have a joint group, and just imagine, here we take kazakhstan, kyrgyzstan, tajikistan, remove the csto, and where is the guarantee that you want, and even armenia at the same time, and macron makes passes to armenia, the united states, but they give guarantees unsafely. and the west will say, well, it’s not us, it’s the afghans, some savages running around in the mountains, they did it all, although we will absolutely understand whose hands it was, i would like to expand the thesis a little more, vadim gigina regarding the kazakh events, which then became clear to our opponent, i just want to remind you that within the framework of the european union and even nato, they spent about 30 years creating rapid reaction forces, and so they still don’t have them, they in its infancy, and when we

overnight...' more than 100 transport planes, carried out this very quick response so effectively that they all gasped, then this, of course, showed them that odb is a real force, well, our president is right, interests and forces really operate in politics, if you have an interest, you must have strength, if you don’t have strength, you won’t have any interest, so if we represent strength, we can set aside our interests, that’s what the deployment of the operational-tactical manager said. here on russian territory, yes, i’m just doing it again i just want to compare so that our tv viewers and listeners understand what level of coordination and trust exists between russia and belarus today, firstly, these nuclear operational charges, yes, they are in belarusian warehouses, they are guarded by belarusian units, secondly, in their maintenance, god forbid, if such a need arises, again it will be the belarusian crews, now let’s compare how this happens in nato. in nato , even nato members and the military leadership still

do not know where exactly the american nuclear warheads, ramshtane says there, but this is again a warehouse and this is again a warehouse that is guarded by the americans, secondly , let me remind you, there was one such precedent that everyone wants to forget about today, in 1976 a huge scandal broke out in nato, when it became clear after the fact a year later that in 1975 the united states of america, without notifying anyone, brought in all its nuclear forces. nato, that is, these are their nuclear forces, in a state of full combat readiness, that is, the next stage would be to press the button, kept quiet about it. so i say again, so that you understand, yes, how much we trust within the framework of this alliance between russia and belarus, how much they have these very rat-like monkeys, wars and the like under the hood. listen, who do you trust, do they trust the lansbergs to make decisions? brussels, after all, is not stupid, or wherever their apartment is located, in brussels, people are not stupid, they sit in the city, you know, besides. here are the strengths and interests,

yes, another component is important in the csto, yes, this is the determination of the leaders, yeah, because no matter how much we have observed what we see in nato, somewhere else, everyone there begins to drag the blanket of themselves, and many can, well, excuse me, jump out of participation in some general operations, that is why the americans keep everything in their hands, so that this does not happen, here we saw that a critical situation had arisen and the leader of our state and the president of russia, they acted clearly and decisively, then everyone else caught up, they supported this, this decision was made . as the norms prescribed in agreement on collective security, this mechanism, it is very important, that it has not rusted and it works, well, on the other hand , the real combat readiness of the armed forces has once again confirmed that yes, these forces are capable of solving specific military tasks, well, i’m

purely journalistically, medino really liked what was happening, i also appreciate this side , everything was said very clearly, yes, everyone is confident that the organization exists, which is also important, yes, what you said shows your confidence, that’s all dotted and dotted, no one is hiding behind any formulations, we have been challenged, if you want to compete, the answer is this, well, this is how i see it, well, it is also very important that the absence of armenian representatives at this summit, yes, it does not mean anything in any way influenced, did not introduce dissonance, but assessments were heard. the president said this after a conversation with pashinyan and this was later confirmed by the secretary general of the cst and so on, that the question of someone coming out, someone organizing some kind of demarche, is not worth it, in any case the organization exists and we will calmly continue to develop according to the planned plan, one of you said before

the program that armenia got rid of karabakh in order to break with the csto, in particular with other structures, i would also like to draw attention to one... such a small but meaningful quote from the president, he, addressing his colleagues, said: “we are all participating in the destruction of the unipolar western-centric world, in fact, he wrote very clearly, not only the current moment, but a certain strategy, it is clear what is meant first of all russia and belarus, how the closest enemy, or rather an ally, who is with the enemy on the western flank, but it seems to me that these words were largely addressed specifically to our transcaucasian and central asian allies, why? well, sometimes there is an opinion that they are far from the main line of conflict, yes, that is, they seem to be trying to balance between the centers of power, china, russia, turkey,

nato, the west, but that’s why this phrase is important, including , the addressee of this phrase is represented by these colleagues, but because, it seems to me, it is very important that they also understand that how no matter how hard they try, and this is a natural desire, to avoid this collision, confrontation, it will still affect them, and the csto is a protective mechanism that can ensure security from various threats, internal, external from different sides, and indeed there is no alternative to replace this, and we can clearly see this in the example. that no one else will help themselves to that extent in ensuring the security of armenia by such means except russia and specifically the odb. we understand the reasons why the armenian the leadership behaves this way, but there is an attempt to shift political

responsibility from themselves to someone else, to the outside, and we understand this, which is probably why we don’t make loud noises. sharp steps, we continue the dialogue with the armenian side, by the way, there, too, in armenia , despite the absence of the prime minister, they nevertheless stated that they are not going to leave the csto and the eu, at least this is the case now, this means that they also weigh everything, including listening to the words of our leader, and understand perfectly well that if this a vacuum suddenly forms in the security of armenia, no one, no france, well, france is acting, it has been screwed up and abandoned , as they say, for them chaos is the main goal, here is real help in a difficult region, of course, it was and will be from our bloc, well, the french libya has already been helped, many people have been helped there, yes, i would also like

to draw attention to the fact that the csto is not only military security, yes, the question was raised, firstly, about the creation of an intellectual component. the fact that we have united, factories of thought and created essentially a single such an analytical group that should support, uh, the policy of the organization, this is a very big moment, and recently our belarusian institute of strategic studies published an interesting article about this, and the fact that attention is paid not only to these threats of a purely military nature, yes, but also that very serious attention is paid to confrontation in the digital world, cybersecurity, this is also heard repeatedly and was voiced at the last summit, because we see how it is developing today, that is, first of all, before

the way there is a direct military attack, there is a long-term information confrontation, there is a confrontation at the level of these actual computer technologies, attacks on critical infrastructure, it is clear that today there is some kind of nuclear power plant that was attacked using an internet attack, it can act as such... an internal destabilizing factor and there will be no need for any external threat, therefore the fact that adc is a comprehensive organization that considers all possible threats is very such an important, serious moment, and of course the summit was held, it still demonstrated how correctly all colleagues noted that even internal disagreements that can exist in an organization between individual personalities. but they do not affect the general understanding of the need for this organization and

its role indeed in the region. vadim frantsevich is absolutely correct , he clearly defines this as the only organization that has no alternatives, but they are not visible, no one is proposing anything like that, i think that the question with armenia, the same western allies, armenia, these allies, yes, they are also probably not interested in... breaking the armenian leadership of sodk, one can suspect them of double games there, they want to get an idea through the armenian leadership , what is happening inside the bloc, but as i understand it, in addition to pashinyan, and the ruling force currently in power, there are sensible people in armenia who understand very well that today, firstly, there are other opportunities for

armenia simply cannot guarantee its security by relying on russia, on the russian base located there, on interaction with the odb, the situation with karabakh just demonstrated this, it’s just that the odb objectively did not have any legal rights to intervene in this conflict, since even armenia itself, through the mouth of its own prime minister nikol pashenyan, recognized the last days. this is that this is a pact, this is a reorganization of the un, security, i have not formulated

it in my opinion, look, indeed, the hegemon, struck a blow to himself, there are several key signs of a collapse, we are simply saying that the polar world has collapsed, that first, the crisis that began back in 2007 has gripped the whole world, the global economic crisis has begun. world economy in the united states, the consequences of this global economic crisis are still being felt. the concept of a unipolar world is a crisis-free world, they failed and, moreover, they were not the driving force for getting out of this crisis. the second point is that a number of military-political conflicts are very important in this regard, the five-day war with georgia, when the americans entered behind georgia, but russia was able to defeat a direct ally of the united states, and the americans did not take any effective measures. now in this regard the key is. this is what is happening, why they cannot allow, as they say, a russian victory, because this will be a clear signal of the military weakness

of the west, the third component, they are losing information and propaganda, information and cultural control, these are the measures that we are taking, on the formation of a new ideology, not only us, but the people's republic of china, and a number of others, say that cultural and ideological hegemony no longer exists. what has covid shown? have the americans acted as the flagship in overcoming covid? no, but we will feel it somehow, i want to say it again, but there’s a plan for what will happen , that’s the problem, it’s clearly not there, there’s not this clear perspective, no one is saying, the world will be like this, and before from time to time, unfortunately, it will happen like this, i want to tell you the reference point when we understand that it has completely collapsed, why is it today is collapsing, why are we specifically talking about this today, yes, everything is absolutely true , we see that the king of the hill cannot cope with his own, yes, he should sponsor, protect, intimidate, he cannot cope with this, but all this

would not lead to such a bright yes fall like this today, because they dared to directly collide with russia, why are they betting so much today... everything is yes, that they must definitely win, because , roughly speaking, they got out and clashed with the very enemy who could ruin them, with from this point of view, if today the united states of america loses to the russian federation, in any sense, yes, that is, they will be successful, they will not be able to impose that plan, and in ukraine, this will show that the united states of america can no longer oppose anything to its main opponent , when it’s 24, maybe twenty-fifth year, i predict that this problem with... will finally be resolved, this will mean the final, yes, that’s sort of the end of this hegemony of the united states, and the future president of the united states, whoever he is was, by the way, maybe maybe even biden, he will sign some agreements on this matter, which will be recorded, i think, that is, there will be some documents, in the end there will definitely be an agreement between russia and the united states, there will be oh, but i still mean it will end the fact that russia and the united states will sit down at the negotiating table, this is

without any, without any, without anything. i want to add one important point, regarding the cst, to complete this topic, i would like to note the success of the belarusian chairmanship, because we mentioned armenia here, and other things, in fact we know very well that us emissaries wandered around all the csto countries, and they offered a variety of pies, cakes, etc., etc., and i think that without a certain diplomatic work of our president of our structures, including within the csto, they would have been it would be easier to lead astray. our allies, but this did not work out, here is the clear, belarusian chairmanship, and the belarusian chairmanship, it contributed to the fact that we calmly passed these stormy introductions into our odb, and today we are confidently passing the baton kazakhstan, we hope that it will continue this line, you know, this is the middle of the process of destroying the unipolar world, or a third of it has passed, we will understand this when the process

ends, yes, i would like to say something else, there is a marker. yes, these markers, they illustrate, let’s say, the state, the sensations of world consciousness, in what world they live, yes, look, today, the anglo-saxon world, it is slowly shrinking, yes, it is no longer an example, a model, an indisputable authority, for more and more cultures of peoples, yes, take africa, all these. look at the military conflict with russia, the economic blockade of the union state of belarus to russia, we demonstrate , that’s the point, that without these western injections, the western protectorate, their

technologies, we live no worse. now they have begun to live, at least the europeans, life has become more difficult for them, people have an understanding, not only the elites, the elites have already had this understanding for a long time, it is not in vain that countries are expanding their accession to brix, the shanghai cooperation organization, and so on, it's all there, it's starting becomes obvious both for, let’s say, and for the population of many countries, and the moment that this universal globalism, which the anglo-saxons imposed on our consciousness, is working against us and only in their name, it has already come for, let’s say, probably most of population of the globe, that's it, but we must not forget about one thing, yes , the most important thing here is how not to believe that you have already

won, this is the very thing, you need to understand what economic markers are by which we can judge , in this sense i would give more cautious assessments, but a marker, for example, when allies begin to break away from the united states, that is, when it becomes clear to those closest to the united states what is needed. either take a more neutral side or rush in the other direction, so far we see that consolidation is taking place, that is , the americans control europe quite tightly, and the pacific region quite tightly, that is, by the way, there are more allies there due to the fear of many china, and

hungary, was a member, i don’t feel either, i will continue. second, of course, in general hegemony, it is based not only on ideas, they are important, here, by the way, the ideology of the west really is. fewer and fewer people believe in this, they see cynicism and such absolute crookedness, especially after israel, and after, well, after many events, but technological superiority and hegemony are still preserved, that is, now for several years there will be a struggle between china and the western bloc for dominance in technology sphere, as soon as china, china’s allies, we, together with china, show that we are independent... from technology we ourselves can develop, then it will be clear that there are at least two or three centers of power on which you can focus, then

the process will pass halfway, and now the final goal, yes, what a multipolar world this will be, in fact, a period of chaos will be enough long, second, who besides the anglo-saxons has experience of such global governance. what it is , at least they have been trying to govern globally for several centuries, this is an important question, is it necessary to govern globally, in my opinion, it is necessary, because multipolar there will not be a world that is absolutely equal, when everyone is happy with each other. anyway, someone will get ahead and there will be, yes, the question is different, what rules will he be guided by, and how is it globally, china will take over the model of this management, and the task is not

to have the world valeriich instead of the united states of america this suggests that this is inevitable, i would recall the example of china, china in the 15th century, technologically, overtook the west and china was the first to make long-distance sea voyages, but then china’s ideology has led to the fact that... and the fact that china is now abandoning the bloc strategy, is very carefully building its concept, one train, one track, is also a guarantee that we do not see a goal for china even by 1949, as they indicate, the exit is not to global leadership, to global governance, look, the common destiny of humanity, in my opinion, it’s still an application, at least, there you need to look in detail, you need to look in detail, but it seems to me that the chinese are learning they don’t collect very quickly... they don’t declare, at least

this generation, as in jurisprudence, the subjective side must be looked at objectively, we must look at what they are doing , ivan mikhailovich, firstly, that means regarding the chinese, i agree with gigin that they are not declaring now, in the future they will not declare, this is too much responsibility, you have to be overly ambitious, and if we take the philosophical concept of the chinese in general, and culture, it is very restrained, now i believe that they will change, okay, let's see, you won't decide for the chinese, second, we won't forget, that there was a soviet experience of management, something we forgot about it, let's call things shifts, as there was a certain management , intervention of the soviet and country, power, in management, including in a variety of countries, as soon as we left somewhere, please , the middle east conflict began to develop completely differently, the events in the asian region are completely different , and so on and so on, that is, in this sense , we need to return, we have this experience,

we were determined by this ideology, now there is no such ideology, in fact, look, this the words are still general, well, this is not an ideology, but a certain concept that can be part of a dialogue, look what is happening, many communist parties have even come forward. do we see the contours of the future world? we are still documenting the process, we are constantly turning to historical examples, which we have actually stated now, but we don’t know how this will happen, but there will be a crisis in the united nations organization, and there will be a collapse of some blocs, absolutely alexey valerevich, when it begins to disintegrate, and we don’t yet see the prerequisites for this, then we will say that this really. well, the expansion of the security council, for example, is clearly such a marker, as alexey said, when times begin to change , and when this happens, well, yes, well, these are colleagues, you can also insert a few, i hope, clever words, i didn’t want to interrupt,

so, returning to the problem of what stage the destruction of the global world is at and what will happen after it, well, firstly, we must understand and see that today , unfortunately, it is not so much the global world that is collapsing as it is destroyed today. this is the system of international relations and the system first the line of international security, which was built decades after the second world war, is that the un is at the top. yes, that’s what i’m saying, that after, that the un was the top, yes, there were still a lot of different kinds of agreements that today have ceased to exist, including the most alarming thing, that already this year after the re-conclusion of the start-3 treaty, russia then suspended participation in it, that is, in fact, this was the last stage, the last thing holding the world back from the actual arms race, this

it turned out that russia is to blame, no, no. it’s not russia’s fault, let me continue, i’ll finish, yes , so as not to get confused, i mean, the question is what, today we see, one way or another, the formation of a whole series of, well, let’s say, blocs and organizations opposing each other, despite the fact , that vadim frantsivich always defends the idea that china is outside the blocs, nevertheless, the initiative launched by china and one train

one way, but the most important marker is that the global world has ended, at least the world with the dominance of the united states should be the destruction of the united states itself, the question, the question should be, on our part, for example, we must navigate, after trump allegedly lost. in the second elections and the capitol was seized, this is an alarm bell, if inside, that is, today the united states, we see that they have created a situation all over the world, creating pain points in which countries must get stuck so that they lose their energy of resistance to the same states, by and large, if we we are talking there about a strategy of counteraction, firstly, the same russia , which is fighting on its borders today, from a strategic

point of view must understand where the pain points of the united states itself are, and this is uncontrolled migration, primarily from the territory of latin america, these are precisely social problems and the impossibility of uniting this pan-american world , they tell everyone that they have common values, human rights, so they speak out, as if they stand above racial, religious, national issues. but we see that this is destroying america from the inside, and the fact that there are fault lines in the usa, precisely in the confrontation of various kinds of social groups, national groups, religious groups, what is observed there today is a very serious drop in the standard of living, which they tried to hide from the same sidzenpin , clearing out san francisco, and then again all this disgrace poured out onto the streets, of course, this is not, such an indirect indicator that... now everything will end, but as vadim

frantsivich likes to repeat, a shining city on a hill, it’s already ceased to shine, many of those who, many of those who go there then start posting their own tiktoks or reflections on facebook or some videos on youtube on social networks, where they say with disappointment: we expected something completely different, you know, i listened, i said it myself, these forecasts and philosophies, the most important thing is that we must understand that there is a huge threat, that this redistribution could end in a global nuclear conflict, to prevent this global nuclear redistribution, this is risk management, unfortunately, we have come to a dangerous chestra, this is such a thing, it works in human psychology, if you drive someone into a corner, then

there is no other way out to attack the enemy head-on, well, this is something like a federation, you need to understand, so here you can say a lot and this, but this threat needs to be clearly understood and not take actions that we can, in fact, this is what he said, yes, that this also represents a need, decay also represents chaos, and it must be controlled, that is, we must slowly select for ourselves levers of control, now i want to talk about this, denies that just a year ago it was scary to imagine, after the start of the war, that someone in the west would oppose the policies that western countries are pursuing, but of course, recently the editorials of the newspapers are full of words, what about zelensky? okay, we can also talk if there is time, but people’s eyes are opened this way , including politicians, so i’ll just give you a couple of these facts, then we ’ll discuss another topic, here’s a member of the european parliament from france, teeri mariyani, well, not bad, she said that sanctions against russia made

europe poorer and russia stronger, now they are explaining to us that the ukrainians lost because they did not listen to the advice of the west, mriania said in the end those who pushed ukraine to this point. and will abandon her, the french politician emphasized, i think that ukraine will be completely ruined, perhaps the same lesson awaits europe, i really liked in this quote, in this statement the phrase “who pushed ukraine to war.” what we've been talking about for so long. it turns out that western politicians they admit that ukraine was dragged in, forced, the most important thing is what assessment do voters give, well, they can tell you, and well, well, what is this individual deputy saying? look, everywhere the trend is amazing, all the initiators of the war, from boris johnson to mark rutte in the netherlands, are leaving the political arena, so i just wanted

to move on to this topic, geert wilders, yes, who won, this one in the netherlands is on election, his program, stop the supply of weapons to ukraine, hold referendums on leaving the eu, the netherlands, and before we had slovakia, and we know hungary, we know serbia will be isolated, it only has 37 seats, you said what people will say, this month, literally there, a month, another, and i said it before , president of belarus and let's listen to what will happen to europe, and if europe, well, as we imagine it, united with russia, technology, resources, that would be a monster, the americans cannot allow this, because this it is impossible to resist, but they will come to this, look, their peoples will be forced,

take slavenia now, hungary occupies a special position, they will still come to us , they will come to russia, because there is a storehouse there, both in africa and in russia, a storehouse, and the world will grow at the expense of the north. russia and at the expense of africa, 40% of mineral resources are there, so they will come here , but the netherlands is one of the most belarusian-russophobic, not that countries, yes, states, let’s say, yes, well, this is the result, but it’s already hanging, even delivery of those f16, 11 pieces that ryuto promised, yes, but today that’s all, sorry, not will be this, i would like to add one more thing, so i couldn’t imagine 20 years ago that i would... e of europe represent yes, it becomes a lesser evil, moreover, they become our partners, and i am sure that if these right-wingers, let’s just say, look, there is lipen in france, yes , there are corresponding forces in spain, hungary

, and so on and so forth, they will begin to unite, here they are, the very idea that our president was just talking about, maybe they will implement , if they are decisive enough, this will be the way to destroy the united states of america. as alexey belyaev suggests, well, this is alexey viktorovich’s dream, please don’t confuse us in this matter, don’t confuse us, but at least weaken the united states of america, because the united states of america exists due to unequal exchange, roughly speaking, by robbing other countries, as soon as they stop being robbed, and whether they do it with joy or not, but they are forced to do it, as soon as they begin to resist, the economic power of the united the states of america will collapse in an instant, believe me, this is the law of the pendulum, the higher, the less freedom and the more painful it is to fall later, therefore the united states of america will be weakened from an economic point of view, i am deeply confident of this, not through war, not by launching a nuclear strike , because as comrade zhuk rightly says, they will respond instantly, this is the destruction of civilization,

no one needs this, so we are using soft methods to pull this blanket under us, pull it out of the connected america and free the entire planet from this, so to speak, very unpleasant... unite, i might add, yes, well, in fact, yes, it looks like europe will be, or what’s left of it, the main prize, as a result, the struggle for a multipolar world, but i, for example, will probably even argue somewhere that the preservation of, say, the european union is some kind of good a priori, or the union of russia, resources and technologies, yes, well, really in fact , the last 50 years have been the integration... of the late soviet union and the russian federation with europe, well, it happened under such ideas. as a result, it ended in an explosion of northern currents and, in fact, a collapse.

europe and russia - there must be some kind of community, and there may be parity interests, i will continue , it seems to me that here we need to get rid of these illusions, for these illusions they bought the late soviet elite, probably early putin still believed in this. in fact, russia and we, representing our military-political and economic bloc, must have resources ourselves. if someone from europe wants to not have to be dependent on someone absolutely and how, for example, the european union poses a threat to us today, it’s not just the union of coal and steel or the schengen zone, the euro zone, this is one of the most ideological associations, their ideology is clearly stated in the lisbon treaty, there are european values, which they consider obliged impose on others, it’s not just about... ideology, we must spread it around the world, the americans understand, they always have pragmatism, these are

the words for democracy, about democracy, then comes the money, there is influence, power, the europeans i have a feeling that this is what the eurasians once said, this is ideocracy, it really is, they believe, at least part of the elites, that european values ​​and their type of democracy are the ideal of their exclusivity, so as long as such a european union exists, but he will always come to us with his values, and maybe it would be more profitable for us to work separately with each country, with france, with germany, with hungary, and the eurobiroti, the european commissioners, maybe they are consigned to the dustbin of history, did not advocate the preservation of the european union, this first, i just want to explain, secondly, the president talked about this, yes the president talks about the unification of europe and russia, what form europe will be in, we don’t need a europe united under these idiotic ones, i want to finish, it should be a different europe, maybe there will be build. on a parity basis, but on a double basis, and to whom should it? she

doesn’t owe anyone anything, she should, in principle , be like that if she wants, the main, main criterion that we should look at, unfortunately, this has left the international arena, it doesn’t matter whether it is the european union or the largest economies of this association, germany, france, they have lost their subjectivity, that’s all, we see this, we are observing, we have said many times. about those politicians who lead, yes, this whole concept, the lisbon treaty is indeed a very strong treaty, the ideological component was very strong, it worked as long as the european union represented subjectivity, independence, today it, unfortunately , after the separation of britain, after the economic crisis that there begins, he is gradually losing this subjectivity, now i’ll hand over the floor, i’ll just say one thing, that we talked about the values ​​that are being imposed, but we agree with many

values, we were ready to work with europe, i have only one question, and they are these values, will respect them, adhere to these values, the right to freedom of expression, freedom of movement , they teach elections, you remember how they canceled elections, where in belgium there is a postal service and so on, yes, for it does not work, i say again, we and they communicated, i did not see a desire to see equals. well, returning to the words of the president, what alexander grigorievich said in simple and accessible language, in fact, this terrible dream of uniting the resources of europe and russia, it was not even an ideology, it was

geopolitics, the german school of geopolitics, some kind of alliance with russia, and this was the understanding of those very anglo-saxons who , first of all, at the beginning of the last century, muddied the waters of the world, yes, they all the time opposed the emergence of any foundations for a durable and political economy. germany and russia, now, of course, europe as a whole in general, this is a mirage, this is a myth, we see this, attempts to create a united europe, in fact, to revive a new roman empire within the framework of the european union, i only call it differently, without calling it an empire, but in fact, this is the imperial, imperial spirit, an attempt to revive the great union, you know, in this whole doctrine there is one important principle, we

use the word union, i’ll finish my thought, and there is one more remark, yes, in short, in short, yes, well, so colleagues talked so much, i was afraid to interrupt them, i think we we cut it, then we don’t get along, so, in fact, the problem, not the problem, but the task is that today in this virtually defragmented europe, where there are different interests, they will never be common, there will never be a single union like this , because today the usa is putting pressure on europe. essentially imposing their will on them. if europe is given absolute complete freedom, and there will be no external factor and the same deterrent in the form of the nato whip, which not only protects them, but also pushes them to certain moments. in russia, of course, russia should still focus, of course , on an alliance not with all of europe, but with individual parts

of europe, in order to thus, on the one hand , weaken them and create a stronger coalition for itself. this time, well, it’s clear that this is only possible when europe, they say that it has lost its subjectivity, and that’s not the case, that is, today the question of maybe europe is a question of concrete, personal leadership in individual countries , and if people appear, leaders who, in addition to ideas, will also have a tough will, they may be able to fulfill this interesting dream. and the second point i wanted to say about the right is that we are rejoicing at the coming of the right to power all over the world, but we shouldn’t be, vadim alekseevich is showing some optimism, of course, the right is actually a terrible thing and a pain that can, if they take over the political space as a whole, then they have a very

radical approach, yes, well, that’s why we must react very carefully. this is what we have been talking about for many years, that the european union maybe the arrival of the rightists is jumping, this is the first thing, so to speak, i’m also frightened by the arrival of the french, but well, they didn’t choose a macron and that it’s better that stalin didn’t come to you, we know, well, if she came to us, the right, justice came to power in poland, here you are right right justice if you think that there are no such right people there, this is actually aliger wilders, so we choose from his program what we like. take his entire program, what the president is talking about, you know, alexander’s concept lukashenko, she is very pragmatic, the first thing we want from europe is de-americanization, the second point is demilitarization, that is , to remove nato from there, the third point is sovereignization, why we don’t need chaos to the west of our borders, ilan musk said, the result, that’s all what we are talking about is the spiritual crisis of the collective west, we do not

want a war to break out there, we need a stable europe with which we would trade, this is the first one. let's listen to what he said about the european union? the brussels model of europe leads to chaos, that's all fewer people are working, more and more people want to live without work. disappears, the consequences of migration are unmanageable, the debt trap grows and grows, and investors transfer their money from europe to america and asia, instead of trade to improve relations, the brussels bureaucrats prefer to lock us up, instead of pulling themselves together, they are offended and lash out for those who tell them the truth to

their faces, by 2030, england and france will not be among the ten largest economic countries in the world, which is what we are talking about, so that europe will be freed a national state, then this is precisely because of american influence , so that it ceases to be american, the second point, a really weak europe will mean for us, this is chaos for us, that is , either migrants will rush there, or there will be a civil war, that is, we will defend ourselves from them, we don’t need this either, moreover, we have always said that we are, well, for peace, for cooperation, for equal rights

, and so on and so on and so on with these sensible people, i think we could find some positions, but about which we could. understand what rights right-wing right-wing liberals or right-wing conservatives come to power, we need right-wing conservatives, because right-wing liberals, they will bring, they will bring to this, look, well, another example, in support, now, please give me 30 seconds, support, in continuation of what the president said, that the people will not give them, trouble came, well, not for us, of course, from where we did not expect, how belarusians and russophobic policies, including, turn out, the study of public opinion in lithuania, we saw the latter, and the level of trust in the prime minister, shamantics negatively assess 74% of lithuanians, the klanstberges.

this is the minister of foreign affairs, we remember him from soviet times, well, heir to the nazis 79% of respondents have a negative attitude towards nausedi, it’s normal, adamko is normal, well, 79 is generally a failure 80% failure look at how the system works , western manipulative democracy, so we say wilders came and won, and where did he win? out of 150 places he got 37, but he would have taken the most percentage, so what? and then they will now take you into isolation, for example, they will try, the same thing here, the system of manipulative democracy, according to pseudo-democracy, it allows you to level out these percentages, as dmitry alexandrovich said, in 3 years the same characters can return back, i still cannot but rule out that boris johnson may this one, that’s exactly the same thing, that’s what you’re talking about, the prime minister has become something, the minister of foreign affairs can return if tusk becomes prime minister, but their negative ratings were also great, but... for account of these prefabricated houses, imitation real politics, at the expense of preserving the deep state, by the way, what is trump talking about, what is the right here absolutely,

the right are right, they criticize this western deep state, all these percentages do not play any role for them, this is a screen, this is a proscenium political theater, but the real direction, it is hidden from the eyes of these voters, you need to understand that today in europe, no longer what was outlined, there is destabilization within society, inside german society, inside french society, now they were talking about ireland within irish society and so on, we need to clearly understand, and this axiom is political, it works everywhere , the more stable a society is, the less desire it has to get involved in conflicts and start wars, what is happening now in europe is a direct path to preparation , if already the vice-speaker of the polish senate, his name is matiej, vividly stated that relations with belarus need to be restored, this is already in general, your activity in the polish direction, i remember as soon as you started, including

alexey, it is necessary say kind words to him, then when you started the poles were running around, he also said, well, what are they there, what are you talking about, in general there are some sentiments in favor of belarus, this is marginalization, how do you like the speaker, normal marginalization, but i want to say that yes, hundreds, hundreds of thousands already poles, well, hundreds of thousands. once again we listened to the programs that you did alexey dermont and piotr petrovsky - the gray eminences of polish politics. almost 100% of the audience is poland, the geography is all of poland, and i want to say once again, as the editor-in-chief of, let’s say, a holding company, as a leader, that the task is not to wet them, poles need to be explained what is happening, we watch polish television, read the state media, they are guilty of the wildest information principle. kseima, by the way, he is a former leader,

let’s listen, okay, i didn’t tell you, poland cannot afford to maintain the current relationship with belarus. if we want to stop the humanitarian crisis, we must look to diplomacy to reduce the number of migrants entering our borderlands. yes, i wanted to say that he... is the former head of the bialystok region and how no one really knows, firstly, the benefits of cooperation with belarus, and secondly, these are the disadvantages, including the situation on the border, so indeed, i think that our voice is heard there, especially among politicians who are directly with us had relations or border regions, this is what can really influence deep poland, the slavic theme, the theme of traditional values. it’s not for nothing that the poles, including those who work with us, came to us, some even ran away from britain, saving their children from lgbt people

propaganda, that is, they found exactly what they wanted, this security, education for children, normal, right here, they themselves tell the poles, in dialogue with us, what and how it works here, and what we really want from poland, and these are just good-neighborly normal relations, but the poles wanted to establish a puppet here , as i understand it, including her, and use her for their own purposes , organized a fifth column here, financed, participated in the overthrow of the government, people were arrested, some of you know who i’m talking about i say, convicted, now they are whining, well, it’s clear that their man, probably the main one, yes, who did, well, violated, so to speak, some of the criminal code in belarus, now because of this they have brought the situation to the point that there is practically no relationship, but i don’t know whether there will be a way out of this, look, the president is offering a way out, and belarusian policy in the polish direction

is very pragmatic. knows these details , when they threatened us with blackmail, on the eve of the elections, we will close the border for you, why they did this, in order to force us to go to some kind of concessions, in fact it was an adventure, and why didn’t they close the border completely, in the end, because they mentioned the bolostovo region, these are the podlazhsky and lublin voivodeships, two border with us, they are tied to us and there is an electorate there, yes , their electorate is there, that is. we do not influence directly, but we understand the relationships, why the president constantly emphasizes brotherhood, cooperation, why he gave instructions to establish contacts specifically to the prime minister, the person who is responsible for the economy, because we are betting here

to this pragmatism and we assess the situation absolutely realistically, we don’t see a union there ... poland, but we don’t interfere, catch the difference , we don’t do what we do, but they finance outright bandits, this is in the belarusian house that they have in warsaw , terrorists according to the criminal code of almost any civilized state, that’s why we behave. how do we not interfere with a kgb operation when the deputy head of the kgb investigative department appears in the center of warsaw? by the way, i propose to discuss how brilliant he is once again, a little humorous, we don’t break the laws, but the fact that this kgb operation was brilliant, we destroyed them morally , showed them all, well, like the lowlands, the most interesting thing is how they then crawled away

and tried to justify it, but what are you talking about, do you think this and how the kgb began to give out the details of this operation in portions, showing the full depth of penetration into their structures , well, i can only say one thing, the meeting place cannot be changed for all these gentlemen, let them all be invited, and now the hunchback, well, for 300 dollars, take photographs of the numbers polish, well, at the same time, this is one of those who was discovered because it is already useful to keep it and how many more were they using it in the dark. the european union is some kind of auditor for 300 bucks, go take pictures, take pictures, record all your people, and so we see a showdown among these fugitives, they actually showed a scheme that works, they write a denunciation against each other, this fugitive official, how is he ts name flew out of my head, this is a man who says that

he did it, but yes, that means they can’t divide it, he sued this office of fugitives, so that they somehow don’t finance them correctly, that is, they come to the point of not just mutual accusations, but wild squabbles , they put forward some endless concepts, they have new projects, the goal is the same, each project is financed, the kgb operation showed the true essence, neither ideology, nor values, nor even any nationalism , but purely... they don’t send children to school anymore, we organize courses for them here on sundays, they don’t come, but they didn’t care about you, you don’t are leaders the basic principle of these fugitives is to settle there

in the west, that’s all. the so-called same story, you saw that this office appointed some lithuanian coordinators there, and according to the passport, i think we will find out in the end they say that social networks have already, in short, well, they published his passport, the most interesting thing is how they report, speak, say, when will you launch the passport, they say, we have already selected an enterprise to which the money should be transferred, where it will be printed, and the most amazing thing is how from generation to generation they inherit this, here these features, bnr, we have written about this many times. on the pages of belarus today there are the same frauds with the so-called bnr passport, which were sold for money, there were even stamps, here’s another idea, by the way, i need to convey this quickly, we published it in your newspapers, you suggested it, don’t blame it on me, i am the author, you are the editor, everything is printed, the editor is responsible, issue stamps, there are superedi, so that it is not unspoken, they say we agree on those, of course, this is already

some fourth or fifth kuruk of emigration, who goes there, receives sit down on money, what else is new there? people who left are simple and are going to leave, they need to be told that you understand. live in their information agenda, read what they write, yes, listen to their statements , these people will never work anywhere in their lives, the question of their life and death is to pretend to receive funding, they have a very strong ideology that is repeated in every plan, it sounds, it is spelled out almost as the main line and thought, you need to transfer money, but it’s everywhere, here’s aksenov, which got scammed, by the way, i told you about it, let’s listen. what, what don’t you like, what don’t you like about okay, his behavior, his activities, there is a feeling that today the person is simply at the apogee

of life’s happiness, that is, not, not visible, not visible in his actions, something like that concretely aimed at the fastest possible change in the situation in belarus. analyzing, i watch him, it’s just such a necessity, i monitor his performances, so, but still i repeat, i have such a feeling that the man has golden days today, and he doesn’t really want these changes to happen, to be close, the same can be said about tikhonovsko, her office. you know, here is the author of the bachb flag, claudio dushdushevsky, who was wildly disappointed in these ideas, he is already 500 years old, we published the flag, by the way, you are reading the wrong newspapers, you are reading belarus today, we published his correspondence and it

was written there, you say that there is no ideology , there is an ideology, it is sweet, it is savory, it is sweet and you don’t work for anything, you know, about, i want to say, as the dean of the faculty journalist. yes, we are now trying to pay special attention to training journalists on the issues of verification, information, fact checking, checking, here is a man who agreed to cooperate with who knows who, like the kgb, well, well, he, he didn’t even bother checking, calling by phone, in fact, to some office there, which did not confuse anything, a thinking person will probably always check before signing anything, entering into any

agreements with someone, and will begin to look for confirmation that even if he didn’t communicate personally, there is a wonderful phrase: if you are convinced that you are not being manipulated, you are lucky, you are in the hands of professionals, i can only say one thing, truly decent. would not engage in this activity at all, well, of course, somehow write, record, audio, at least someone, maybe he knew that he committed a patriotic act, he helped the official intelligence service of the republic of belarus, maybe he was even awarded a closed by decree, i don’t know, maybe it will come back soon through the commission, oh, well, well, we have left a few minutes, the middle east, well, everything is the same, although there is a truce there, kennedy, robert, younger, you know this one, right? very popularly explained, in general, why the united states of america needs all this, what interests they have, which, i think, is what causes most conflicts, let ’s listen, israel is a stronghold for us, it’s almost like having an aircraft carrier in the middle

east, it is our oldest ally, if israel disappears, russia, china and the brix plus countries will control 90% of the world's oil and it will be a disaster for the us. so so, in order to control 90%, russia did not control 90% of oil. we saw a video this week of fighting with terrorists, but there under the slab. please show me, let’s see, yes, i understand that the americans asked to use fewer aerial bombs, but as i understand it, it ’s either a family, yes, only, there’s more than one family, but what about this, have you heard anything, no? according to this video, no one was indignant, no one was indignant, there was nothing, yes, everything is fine, according to kennedy,

the main reason is oil, ivan mikhailovich, well there was another one of the advisers to the american former leaders, who began to talk on camera about how they killed 4,000 palestinian children, that’s not enough, well, it’s true that he was later detained in the usa, what will happen next, the situation is terrible, because these these are the most praised ones, not that it doesn’t work, no one even thinks about using it, no one thinks about treating israel from a point of view, again objectively neutral, the statement that israel is our people who sits there specifically for so that we controlled the middle east, quarreled these arabs among themselves, controlled oil, well, as they already said here, this cynicism was quite visible, a drop, more, less, it doesn’t play a role now, that is,

everything is obviously clear here, from the side of the united states, israel acted always as its battering ram, a trojan horse in the middle east, the question is what to do with this now, how to resolve issues now , generally respecting the rights the un once spoke about the need to grant palestine the same rights creation... there is a right, but it is not implemented , and no one is going to support, if there is an attempt in the west to tell the truth, we see how repression immediately begins, people are removed from the air, who are on their personal social networks, the western journalist is alone there , yes i wrote, they removed me from the air, in general, students take to the streets with slogans, then these students are trained. all this is happening, everyone

basically sees it, the question was absolutely right, the americans are saying that we will never leave israel and will be its support, because otherwise our entire architecture of influence on this region will collapse, and this is what they were talking about, vadim alekseevich said, not for the sake of democracy, yes, but the soviet union once squandered its capabilities. gave it voluntarily, but the soviet union, at least, did it for the idea, for the idea that vadim frantsivich spoke about, communism, marxism, that is, something big and bright, but here is something liquid and black, ivan mikhailovich, i just let me perhaps give you another topic, november 22, exactly it’s been 60 years since the assassination of john kennedy, the uncle of the man you told today, which quite reasonably, and sort of reveals.

american politics, well, now i won’t rant about the fact that, yes, it still hasn’t been revealed and so on, and it seems like everything is being blamed on a lone killer, maybe it’s been revealed, not published, and so everyone already knows , strictly speaking, who killed and why, who taught the ar is still only known, which means i only want to say one thing, this murder characterizes the united states of america as a certain political system, yes, which we once set up as a standard, here you go... they defeated their own president , carried out a coup d'etat, yes, the federal bureau of investigation, and the central administration were involved, and so on, and nothing, and this was presented to us as a standard of democracy, here you go, dear friends, listeners, viewers, think about this, where they were pulling us, who they wanted to make us, yes, well, in conclusion, you know the singer of all maidans, henri levy, who hugged with our people and after, well, he hugs with all the bandits, he decided to congratulate

the 10th anniversary of the maidan, it was a big holiday, and it was interesting, it was interesting to watch the comparison of those statements, we all know what is happening now, well, he published a photo in congratulations on twitter, of course, the nazi chevron in this photo immediately appeared, twitter readers, the french, told him that you were engaged in absolute propaganda. nazism and the photograph of the little ones changed, yes, he has a nazi, he redid it, yes, there is, it was a message, that’s it, such a photograph appeared , well, it was supported, supported by the norwegian ministry of defense, the official website, they talked about what they accept, the ukrainian experience, they accept, cooperate with the ukrainians, well, naturally, immediately the favorite swiss stick appeared on the official website of norway.

well, in principle, i think this does not surprise us, but the prime minister of sweden, speaking to the public, suddenly almost said that israel and sweden and the european union are unanimous in the opinion that israel has the right to, that is, self-defense, that is, they discuss it on the sidelines, yes , but yes, but they need to say that well , say the word democracy more often, but also say that for self-defense, well, ending with the united states, about the united states, about the west. discuss where they are heading, i generally cannot explain this phenomenon in any way, you see what is happening in american stores , another video has appeared, just show me, i don’t know, the microphone, maybe don’t turn it off, yes, look, this as far as i understand, they

have a christmas sale without payment, well, that’s that it’s black monday, that look at them, people come in and just take them out of the store, that it’s a terrible dream of the american elite, communism has won in america, anarchosyndicalism is not communism, that’s what all this will lead to, that’s what i was talking about at the beginning of our program with you, these are just manifestations similar to the uncontrollability of american society, the police are silent and cannot do anything, they themselves created such laws that these unfortunate african americans are not allowed, then if you stole less than a thousand dollars, then it’s not like that, so there is hope that this approach will tear america apart, well, but this cannot be respect for blm, and it seems to me, to put it mildly, disrespect for businessmen, for sellers, for people, private property, this generally turns everything upside down, well, how for me, it was game, it was a club of editors, thank you very much for coming, we will see you in exactly a week,

goodbye. tsar , boyars, veche, this is the traditional form of government for us for centuries, this is the base, and to it we can and should add a superstructure from what is called democratic institutions, this includes the election of a leader, that is, the president, and parliamentary elections, and a national referendum, it is important for me that you appreciate not the form about the tsar, but the essence of what i say when we... by strengthening the national nervous system we are returning to the system management is a historical council, it does not contradict a strong leader, but complements the system. what is the difference between a politician and a statesman? a politician thinks about future elections, and a statesman thinks about future generations. we can somehow help the world to find peace only if if we ourselves have order at home,

because if we suddenly have a disorder, then we will have neither time nor energy left for the world’s problems. propaganda project. watch on the tv channel. childlike curiosity and genuine interest. can you tell us about your very first experience as a conductor? is success luck or hard work? it's luck. why does an orchestra need a conductor? what if the musicians themselves know what to play? to prevent everyone from pulling the blanket on themselves, there must be a leader in the team. absolute honesty and sincere emotions of the characters. we look so old. we bought a cossack night, dismantled it and delivered it through the window, when i saw the student, i thought she was going to have a heart attack, so you often argue about work, well, we often kill each other at work, a talk show in which famous people answer to the tricky questions of the younger

generation. how strict a father are you? well , i think that this question is some kind of dummy question, but do you have any bad habit, yulia, what kind do you have? bad habit, no, come on first, they say that with creative it’s difficult to get along with personalities, and you’re an easy person, we’ll leave that for behind the scenes, look at the project 100 questions for adults on the belarus 24 tv channel

. we are clear, yes , i see, i feel, we were waiting, preparing, but it’s nothing that we submitted an application to the legislative office, as we submitted it, you’ll sort it out, yeah, now. thread , yeah, please tell me, your colleagues, they seem to be aware of our relationship, well , let’s come to an agreement with you in the future, since that’s the case it turned out that we will have to become related, you me... like a man, approach me with dasha on this topic, there is no need to be frank, what are you doing, you want war, fighting, it looks 35, and what better was not found? i drilled igor, as if in myself, and we are women, we are all inventing something, love, fidelity, the swan folded its wings and killed itself after its beloved, now, these are ducks, and where are you going, to the store? nothing, in europe 40 years are just starting to give birth. watch the series: “my husband’s best friend”, on

the belarus 24 tv channel. every day we we experience a million emotions, we can be happy, angry, surprised, sad. sometimes our emotions are beyond our control. emotions are much stronger. this emotional power literally grabs our soul. and once it has entered us, it becomes an integral puzzle of life. after all, the secret of music is that it finds

an inexhaustible source of expression where speech