[000:00:00;00] it’s more difficult to search, you know, this is a creative process, that is, uh , i shouldn’t get bored with it, this is my favorite thing, that is , if i don’t like it, i won’t do it, the current topic that worries lilia nishchik, images world civilizations, that’s what she called a series of portraits, each of which reflects the vision of the authors of a particular civilization, for example, this is our slavic image, i think this is the goddess lelya, so i just depicted her, as if playful hooligan, here the wind is developing, in the hands of lily nishchik today a huge palette of tools, there is no shortage of ideas, as in her youth, she has a huge number of ideas, ideas for plans, she has found her path and follows it, without betraying herself and

without bending to anyone’s immediate needs, she develops, discovers new topics for herself , is looking for unusual techniques, here i combine the structure of the letter, here somewhere i paint smoothly, yes, somewhere in volume, somewhere i do foxing, somewhere i just squeeze paints out of a tube directly on the canvas and mix them, but not even using palettes, that is, this is clean for me personally, this is my life, i like it , i get pleasure from it, that is, i don’t have to suffer there, look for... inspiration, so i know that i have many creative plans, i need to implement them, that is, i don’t have time to be bored or sad, a real artist is a person who essentially constantly breaks stereotypes, our heroine is great at doing this in literally every work, but there is one global stereotype,

as samalia says, which... ..would like to change? breaking stereotypes, what can be done and some little thing, and there are cups, teapots, plates, but you can still engage in real creativity, so to speak, real art, more in the global and solve more global problems, i want it to be not decorative and applied art, yes ,

that's exactly the sculptor's sculpture. as if they were holding a book in their hands, clutching one piece after another, sniffing at the words of their skin, the greatest creativity comes from here. the most valuable and useful books are these books. the books contain the thoughts of the past. the galas of people are clear and expressive. that's it, that's it i made a lot of chalavets, hogged old

books, and became a charmer.

read more about the past years, read more about the past, appreciate the past for our daily life, belarus 24. we introduced such an indicator as to what is the effect of investing a budget ruble, and if we take innovative activity, then in the first half of the twenty-third year, per ruble of budget investments were implemented products cost approximately 24 rubles, of which approximately 22 are high-tech science products, we do everything for the patient free of charge, absolutely, all stages of treatment are paid for by the patient, it makes no difference to us whether the operation costs 100 rubles, or does it cost 100,000 dollars? europe as a periphery can use the intellectual, economic, financial, and technological resources of europe to invade the united states in a powerful struggle with china. and the efficiency of the government’s activities is, well , the highest, because even under the conditions of the imposed sanctions, nothing has fallen in our country; this year we will see growth. the markov project is nothing personal. watch on

the tv channel belarus 24. the meeting of the odb collective security council in minsk actually ends the belarusian

chairmanship in the organization. the achieved goals were set back in november last year, but the international situation does not allow us to relax. arms race. cold war terminology is back on the agenda. the military budgets of the nato countries are growing rapidly, poland is growing by leaps and bounds next year promises to reach 4% of gdp, i wonder how this compares with their constant declarations about the defensive nature of the alliance, or with the so-called largest modern cold war exercise, nato, does not correspond in any way. at the summit, the head of state focused the attention of his colleagues on the uncontrolled proliferation of weapons, in particular, we all observed very well when ukrainian weapons, or rather western weapons supplied to ukraine, ended up in the hands of hamas militants, how

relevant this challenge is for us today, here - not only for us, but of course for the entire world community there is a global danger, let's see how in this way, today it is spreading on the one hand, we must understand that this is a market that, well, is probably on par with the spread of drug trafficking, illegal sales of alcohol, organ trafficking, and most likely, it brings in much greater profits, that is, one side is issues related to the criminal component, when single copies of small arms are distributed somewhere for criminal structures, such a black zone of all this, on the other hand, this is a gray zone, where quasi- criminal structures that are involved in including some state special forces, which extend throughout the world, for example, who do you think ranks first in the illegal sale of weapons today?

this is the united states of america, i think that this is probably not news for anyone, for no one it will be absolutely surprising; dozens of feature films, of course, look, 80% of the weapons sold are in canada, canada is a prosperous state... 80% in mexico, in latin america, these are all weapons, which is supplied from the united states, i will not talk about how weapons are supplied to the middle east and so on, let's focus on... our regions where all this is happening, and here ukraine, ukraine, comes into focus, where cannabis has already been legalized today, the legalization of cannabis is underway, supposedly for medical purposes, well, we understand that for recreational purposes this is also not far off, this is the well-known khimprom, which today has essentially taken over the whole of ukraine, is selling synthetic drugs and of course the sale of weapons, look, it turned out that hamas is already fighting with these... weapons that were going on the territory of ukraine, we have 24-25

years ahead of us, the possibility that in some hotheads such a decision will be made by someone about to invade our territory with the aim of separating part of it from our republic, then of course a flow of these weapons can pour in, this is for us, in fact , a big challenge precisely within the framework of our military security, it’s not for nothing that rahmon said that we we need to strengthen the western... commonplace opinion from the fact that we are approaching the point of no return to the fact that diplomacy still plays a decisive role in international relations, in your opinion, how are things really going? well, in my opinion, of course, diplomats are working and the international organization is working, another question is that it is not always possible to agree on some points, this is most often due to the ambitions of individual leaders, let’s say, let’s take this at the end of the twenty-first, beginning of the twenty-second year , which cost the west to refuse admission.

it wouldn't lead to such a big conflict tens of thousands of deaths and it is unknown how the situation will develop further, but in general , of course, dozens of international conferences on security issues are held every year in the world, and literally in october here in belarus there was an international conference dedicated to issues of european security, at these conferences including security issues discussed, regional, global and so on today, conflict... in the world, no more than it was 10, 20, 30 years ago, this, of course, is also the result the work of diplomats, the result of the work of some international structures, well, in general, traditional diplomacy , which we are talking about now, it’s like such a beautiful phrase, but the word traditional has recently not quite fit into the paradigm of western tolerance, tolerance diplomacy or western tolerant world, but if we talk about this seriously , then in general... diplomacy or, as we say , traditional diplomacy is, first of all

, an instrument of the powerful, and this has always been the case, as you correctly said, firstly, uh, on the one hand, we say that when this is a multipolar world, then it is possible to negotiate on an alternative basis, where there are countries of the first, second, third world, precisely in the panitian apparatus of the twentieth century, and not, as now, also third countries - these are some underdeveloped countries or countries trying to develop, precisely in that paradigm. in the ponetial apparatus that we are talking about, it is precisely the 20th century. second, a unipolar world, where all states live in diplomacy, which is based on rules and conditions that dictate the same the united states, too, is what we are witnessing, essentially every day. and the most important thing is what is happening in today’s world, why today the whole world has really risen, in essence. today many people talk about it. that we have just entered an era of

geopolitical turbulence. we have already been caught up in the whirlwind of changing eras. you and i are witnesses to the destruction of the previous system of international relations. and we are participants in breaking the existing unipolar, and if you like, west-centric model. there is a gradual transition to multipolarity, which is complex. dramatic transition. this is due to the fact that western politicians do not want to give up their positions, ignoring the inexorable course of history. let's see today, well, that the nato bloc is expanding to the east, this is finland, which today is closing all checkpoints, the baltic states, which is stationing additional groups of troops there, bypassing its constitutions, poland, which is being militarized along with romania and moldova. who also takes

a russophobic position, what is happening today in nagorno-karabakh, how they are targeting our central asian region, then this is syria, uh, then you and i go to yemen, we go to africa, where with the countries of the maghreb, the countries of the sahel, all these events indicate what, that today we we clearly see the fault line between the global west and the global east, that is, two global civilizations, we have an era ahead of us... truly civilizational polycentrism, where polycentric centers, not much of the polar, but polycentric, where polycentric forces unite... around civilization itself, it will be in latin america, it will be 100% in africa , the arab islamic world will unite , china will be the center of civilization, china will be the center of civilization, there is a lot of talk now about the upcoming transformation of the security council of the united nations, which

today does not work and is represented it is precisely these centers that mainly fulfill the interests of western countries, and in my opinion these centers should become members of this security council, which will... all countries should be on equal rights, here is the organization of a collective security treaty, where these countries act as equal partners , and is, in all likelihood , the core today that will become the basis for changing this world and creating a polycentric one. we see that they are trying to speculate on the topic of the lack of representatives armenia and at the summit in belarus put forward completely different conspiracy theories in this sense, in your opinion, what is this connected with and whether this could be a demarche or a well-thought-out internal political position, given

the rather difficult situation in armenia itself? of course, one can have a different attitude towards the absence of the prime minister of armenia at the summit in minsk, we were pleased to see one of the leaders of the organization’s member state at our place, especially since the results of our chairmanship were summed up, the president of kazakhstan announced the directions of activity for his country’s chairmanship , but in any case, the csto secretary general, after minsk, will present the entire package of documents to pashinyan, perhaps he will sign, at least at least it will be a sign, and, of course, it will convey the spirit of this session, which took place in minsk, that is, there is hardly anything here. i’m interested in your opinion regarding regional conflicts, which, among other things, cause a certain emotional outburst in society and fuel all kinds of terrorist movements. we have seen that there are already certain statements from western politicians that there is a tendency to increase such alarming feelings

regarding the development of terrorism, here just the other day there was an explosion on the canadian-american border of a car, some publications have already stated that this was an attempt at a terrorist act, in your opinion, to what extent is the threat of a resumption of these acts of terror, it is relevant today, what the west is famous for today, for what it has created, there used to be a gold standard, yes, but today the double standard is the basis of everything , that is, even we cannot fully determine what it is, where the difference between terrorism and the national liberation movement is, a vivid example - in this sense, the head of state has repeatedly focused on this, that these regional conflicts that the white house is unleashing, they will cause such a reaction among the arab population, among the islamic population , you are afraid of terrorism, but you got it, you created it with your own hands, look what else will happen, you are doing this in vain, in vain, no one

your democracy through death is not needed, you have millions of dead, relatives, people, and you know among muslims what it is, a blood place, they will never forgive this, never, you don’t think what will happen tomorrow, but in vain, and how should you respond to countries east to west, only this way way they will take revenge, they have blood feud at their core, and this will continue, it will be based precisely on terrorist acts, that there will be terrorist acts, although for the mujahideen themselves, for the people themselves who are ready to sacrifice for the sake of their faith, for the sake of his family and friends, it will be, as they say, he will relate to it. as a national liberation movement led by its people, we must prepare for this, we are at the very beginning of this confrontation, the confrontation between west and east. accusations about the deployment of russian tactical nuclear weapons in our country on our territory are simply

absurd, we repeat for the hundredth time we are not threatening anyone, we are simply learning diplomatic so-called etiquette... from those who made the language of force a global trend. these are the realities of today; only the presence of powerful weapons guarantees security in the region and gives the right to vote in the international arena. and the very fact that we have gathered at one table suggests that we are adequately responding, assessing the challenges of the time and are ready for them resist together. the head of state focused special attention on the role of nuclear weapons. based on the fact that its presence allows , among other things, to talk on equal terms with the powers that be, how relevant and important is this in our time? but most importantly, yes, the head of state also focused on the fact that until 2016 we lived quietly and calmly, until it turned out that they were practicing

simulated nuclear strikes on us, and of course, this greatly worried, first of all, everything military, military-political leadership our country, because, of course , national security issues cannot be of secondary importance. i think that every person on earth would probably never, even in a nightmare, have had the desire to see what was going on... heroshima and nagasaki, well, the same thing, if we look at what, for example, the americans were doing in northern syria or what is happening today in the gas sector, without a doubt we see that it is scary, that the world today is, well, on the brink of world war iii, i think about this, everyone, politicians, all the military, are already talking about this, they are warning about this, the protection of our interests, namely the military security of the state, was decided in such a way that, firstly, it was necessary to create parity, namely the forces of means against those that are in our western and southern borders, and

, of course, resolve this issue in such a way as to exclude any possibility of invasion of our territory. and here, probably, the important point is not to get involved in this arms race, because anyway, this is the same attempt as to collapse the soviet union, simply by redirecting the main resources to the development of military infrastructure, including, of course, this is why we are approaching a reasonable, balanced approach to equipping our armed forces. look at the policy poland is pursuing today, it is grabbing these weapons systems from all over the world, who will give what? in general, the principle of military development in poland is quite difficult to understand, but we took a completely different path, fundamentally, without increasing the number of armed forces, well, except for the fact that up to 70,000, which is necessary due to events in in the south of our country... we have taken the path that it is by increasing the potential, the combat potential of our armed forces, that we can create this parity,

that is, we have the latest missile systems, we have aviation complexes, we have radio-electronic systems combat, air defense, at its core, having armed forces that are not small in composition and compact, we are able, even if, together with a regional grouping of military forces, to completely create such a grouping that will ensure the security of our state will cool very , very many minds. even poland, which today buys these hymers there, literally , you saw, we received the latest divisions and iskans of russian production, our polonaises, 2m, which today are already recognized as the strongest multiple launch rocket systems in cancer, we essentially produce ourselves such missile systems, well, in collaboration of course with our partners, this is a huge achievement of our military-industrial complex and the prospects, moreover, for the development of this missile

we have very good weapons systems based on the results of the summit in minsk, what are the current results, what are the key points that can be noted? key points, of course, first of all, this is summing up the results of belarus' chairmanship in the odb during the year, no one can... belarus is that it treated the chairmanship formally or ineffectively, a lot has been done, first of all, of course, this issues within the csto, that is, this is a matter of interaction, and issues of eliminating some contradictions, we we know that there are contradictions within our organization, great steps have been taken towards the analytical component, however, this is the initiative of the president of belarus, he put forward this initiative, spoke about this more than once before our chairmanship, the first steps have been taken, the conference that we are talking about,

this is also a significant step in this direction, and of course, during the year the president of belarus repeatedly communicated with the leaders of the csto member states, and some issues, including those related to organization , were discussed and resolved, and that is, that in during the presidency of belarus, the csto did not become a party to conflicts, neither in ukraine nor in the south caucasus, this is also important... got in the way somewhere, then the consequences could be unpredictable, that is, we continue to remain in the organization that is aimed at ensuring security, at preventing conflicts on our territory. you know, probably, the main result that can be stated is the first thing, that this organization, as a military-political union, continues to exist, and not just exist, but develop. because exactly this agreement, this military-political alliance

makes it possible for us to exist in those regions. in which we find ourselves, the presence of the nuclear umbrella of the russian federation ensures precisely the military security of all states in all these regions. well, in my opinion, the most important result is that many military-political issues have been considered, primarily related to improving the system of collective forces. the main efforts were focused specifically on the peacekeeping forces, where the unified command is being reformed, combat logistics, technical, service personnel, that is, there are many aspects that the heads of state, as well as the heads of military departments, the ministry of foreign affairs, focused on; they say that against the backdrop of military-political cooperation, our collective security treaty will continue to exist , with us the chairmanship passes to kazakhstan, a rather unique situation when both the chairmanship and the secretary general, all, say, the keys are

in the hands of kazakhstan, in your opinion, kazakhstan himself, and the president of kazakhstan at the session already voiced the directions in which they will work, first of all, this is connected , of course, with cooperation with international organizations, the un and so on, but here , of course, i would like the csto to find some kind of interaction with nato , because it is necessary at least for the sake of contact. notifying each other, some kind of interaction is necessary, that is, kazakhstan , in my opinion, should also do this, kazakhstan also puts issues of collective strong response at the forefront, we know that he experienced first-hand what the operational transfer of streb forces is, and of course, some obstacles, customs and border control must

be removed when odb forces are, of necessity , transferred to other countries. and he also outlined this, but in my opinion, kazakhstan should continue the line that belarus started on the analytical component of the cst, that is, that the president of belarus started this initiative, put it into practice, it needs to develop further, because it is very important to understand the state, in the states of the odb, know public opinion, it is necessary to know the military-political situation in the regions, and we know that odb'. these are three whole regions, three zones of collective security, these are eastern european, aucasian, central asian, central asian , in your opinion, what is currently the number one issue in ensuring security, this is the balance, first of all, of efforts that are associated with the state, the individual and society, and most importantly, these are issues of military security,

on the one hand, we were able, as i already said, create parity in forces and means, ensure security... on our borders and thirdly, form our strengthen our mobilization capabilities, not only improve the territorial defense system, but today we are talking about the people's militia, as an integral part of the possibility that any aggression against our state , it will be, the protection will be of a general national and national character, first of all, the readiness of citizens to defend their fatherland, because if people are not ready to defend their country, then they will not make sense - what kind of weapons, and what strategy, tactics and so on , that is, it is precisely the readiness of people to defend themselves, their

history, nature, culture, faith, people, behavior, adzin once you want and will not be forgotten