[000:00:00;00] there won’t be, this is a quote from alexander lukashenko, and tomorrow, apparently, has come, and if there are negotiations, it will be on russia’s terms, but no one will agree to a short-term truce, we swam, we know, as angela merkel admitted, the previous truce was necessary for arming ukraine, when sobriety comes, and if it comes, they will offer us something, we will think about it 10 times. all these proposals, to what extent they meet our interests, to what extent these european colleagues are reliable and negotiable, they they have undermined their ability to negotiate, their reputation very, very much, well, maybe not completely yet , but zelsky, having completely sold off the country, sending his people into the meat grinder, incurring the contempt of the west, will have no choice but to end

his life by suicide or be shot by his own generals , such is the death of a traitor, such is the fate of a fascist, and not a single ukrainian will cry about his death , because there will be no one to cry, but this is probably different, yaxenia

lebedeva was with you, see you in the next program. can you tell us about your very first experience as a conductor? is success luck or hard work? this is a vision. why does an orchestra need a conductor if the musicians themselves know what to play? that everyone does not pull the blanket over themselves, there must be a leader in the team. absolute honesty and sincere emotions of the characters. we look so old, we bought a cossack night. him and his scene was delivered through the window, when i saw the student, i thought she was going to have a heart attack, so you often argue with her about work, well, we’re killing each other often at work, a talk show in which famous people answer tricky questions from the younger generation. how strict a father are you? well, i think this question is some kind of dummy question, right? if you have any bad habit? julia, what is your bad habit?

no, come on first, they say? that it is difficult to get along with creative individuals, and you are an easy-going person, we will leave this for the backstage, look at the project 100 questions for adults on

the belarus 24 tv channel . hello viewer, my name is igor, this is my propaganda, let's begin. part of the audience, especially those who are on the run abroad and are deprived of the opportunity to watch comfortably. in beautiful belarus, but are subscribed to the ontt youtube channel, now they are waiting from me for something about mr. aksyonov, who has been misled by the state security committee for more than a year, posing as some kind of accounting chamber of the european union, receiving reports from aksyonov about the activities of the fugitives, i won’t refuse i have the pleasure of repeating once again that very scandalous in poland and lithuania, taking into account their correspondence in closed chats, a fragment of our prank, when the kgb makes a spectacular entry into the security seminar for the belarusian opposition. good afternoon, can everyone see and hear me? yes, we are pleased

to welcome you to our security seminar. we are glad to welcome everyone who came today, and first of all, let me introduce the floor to our organizer and sponsor of our security seminar. good evening, everyone present, first of all, on behalf of the state security committee, i would like to thank citizen okshyono for his long and fruitful cooperation with us, well as for other participants in the seminar, i draw your attention to the fact that attempts to encroach on belarusian statehood, therefore, the most prudent thing on your part would be to confess to the competent authorities and repent. if

no questions arise, i suggest that you consider the general prevention activity successfully completed. meet me at the kgb investigative department. i won’t say anything more yet, although i can, but i’m sure that it’s absolutely true. from hype to, say, a discussion of the importance of patriotism, what kind of duzho is it not bardzo, as the poles say. i have spoken more than once in this program, that the world of social networks, media and public comments and the real world, they are increasingly moving away from each other. now i’ll reveal the same statements of the fugitives, they call on their supporters to boycott the future parliamentary elections in belarus, because they allegedly will obviously be dishonest. the ones who are dishonest in this situation are not really us, not our elections , but precisely... the fugitives, because every time they see that nothing of the opposition is shining into the election campaign, they cowardly call for boycotts, taking off their the prospect of an absolutely shameful defeat, when a window of opportunity opens for them, as in the twentieth, then from

the elections attempts to gain power, what does gaining money mean for them, you can’t drag them by the ears, the security forces have to drag them away for something else so that the country is calm lived without these greedy bololov. in assessing the fakeness of public statements that there is generally a basis for western populist politics, i personally rely on, now you will be surprised, the head coach of the russian national football team of the rostov club valery karpin, but fans know that one from karpin’s favorite phrases, and then what, and this is a very important question for the real politics of real government, so they gave tikhanovskaya cookies in the white house, and then what, and then nothing, they gathered somewhere fugitive in warsaw, so that again try to unite against lukashenko, although in reality they are for funding, but then what? nothing further, they quarreled as usual and so on. dear viewer, if you read something about politics or economics, something that seems sensational or at least important, the question is: what next?

always remain in your subconscious. what could happen next after the call for a boycott of the elections from the runaways? and then it may be that the belarusian state of the old opposition, which inside belarus can organize a little more simply. entry into the electoral campaign, and in some cases even help , and the same applies to the presidential elections in 2025. imagine what a cry there will be in warsaw and vilnius if someone from the titular belarusian opposition, but not fugitives, is registered as a presidential candidate. and then what? this question comes in different forms. the vertical management is set by the president, especially often recently. last monday, alexander lukashenko held a personnel day, appointing several ambassadors abroad at once , from the important thing, the head of state demands that the work of our representative offices bring concrete results for the economy, not just photographs, handshakes, smiles of ambassadors with leaders of foreign states, whatever they may be were, let's abstractly imagine

the following news: the ambassador of belarus to france met with macron and discussed, of course, bilateral cooperation, bright material, there will be beautiful photographs and it seems that our ambassador is a great fellow, since he... met with the nominal leader of the whole of paris. and then what? and then nothing, because at the beginning of next year few people will write that the trade turnover between belarus and france has not grown and even fallen, despite. macron’s hollywood smile and the tenderness of his handshake, famous on the sidelines of paris , with our ambassador’s hand. lukashenko demands results, not the illusion of a successful process. the point is for us to send strong diplomats to places where they are not going to work with us, even if they make a statement that they are going to work. a week ago we talked specifically about serbia, and it seems to me that it was a very important conversation. i once worked in belgrade when alexander lukashenko met with his colleague and teska vucic. and i dare

say, our president was counting heavily on vučić as... the serbian people, with whom the belarusians have historically excellent relations. then in 2019 i was able to ask a question to the president of serbia, who, in essence, this is exactly what a statement about obligatory friendship and cooperation is one thing, but what comes next is sometimes completely different. then alexander lukashenko said in 1999 that he came so that serbia would become yugoslavia at least a few millimeters , then even closer to the world, now everything... and the world, but do you think ordinary serbs remember what happened 20 years ago? back in politics, because, despite all the agreements between governments and presidents, it is a serbian person who goes to the store and buys either belarusian or european products, the serbian director chooses whether to buy a belarusian tractor or an american one, or in quarries, and buy belarusian bilas or chinese equipment, do the serbian people remember what happened 20 years ago in politics, in your opinion? and last week, alexander lukashenko

ordered a public audit of belarusian-serbian relations. nobody is saying that everything is bad with us, besides , minsk understands perfectly well that belgrade is having a hard time in the region and nato is putting a lot of pressure on them, but still the rhetoric of public statements is somehow not strongly coincides with reality, then it is more logical to correct either rhetoric or reality. we need to understand the policy that serbia is pursuing and wants to pursue in relation to belarus. if they want, then there must be a result in trade and economic relations, if they want to wag their tail, roughly speaking, and support european-american sanctions against belarus, well, that’s their job, let them decide and support, if they have forgotten the goodness with which we went to them, and back , for example, africa, from a political point of view you can hug and shake hands with almost all the presidents of this continent, this will be very

good for the electoral rating, especially given the fact that africans now defiantly refuse to shake hands with the west, but alexander lukashenko, by the way, as always, is not concerned about his political rating, but the real result, because after he personally agreed on cooperation with the leader of zimbabwe and the leaders of his neighboring countries, he constantly nightmares, in a good sense, the vertical of management, with the question, what next? they we are waiting for a very stage. we have proven that we are respectable people, they want us to transfer our technologies, in mechanical engineering and in other sectors in construction, healthcare, education, and in the agricultural sector, so that we transfer our technologies to zimbabwe, with the main emphasis on the country where we are very much needed and where we can help them, but naturally it is non-charitable. for me, the key words of the president from this fragment are that our help to the continent is

not charity, naturally, from such we intend to earn help, which is not only normal for international relations, but also completely natural and the only correct thing, here i will share my thoughts on the topic of friendship in politics , that it is difficult to be friends in politics, i will start with the personal history of my principles of work in journalism , making friends in such a creative profession is quite difficult, i’ll say right away that i’m an insensitive cracker and a cynic, so it will be easier to perceive what is said next. i have colleagues who are friends, although more colleagues are friends, and this is very different for me sometimes colleagues and friends come with the following question, they say, help me, tell me, i need, for example, a fragment of the president ’s speech, about this, you know better, you’ll find it faster, my friend, it took me several years to learn to answer approximately the following way: my friend, you and i , of course, are friends, and if you turn to me for help on some personal issue, rest assured, i will always help. but you

came to me with the question of whether we are working, and for some reason you are trying to do this task entrusted to you, for which you receive a salary shift it onto me, arguing that it’s our non-work relationship, in my opinion, it’s strange to help you , which i consider as me doing your job, of course i won’t, otherwise we’re friends, of course, isn’t it, from time to time it turns out that’s not the case , my colleagues are offended by me, my friendship outside of work is fading away, due to the fact that i... in my opinion, honestly, which is very important for friendship, i talk about a certain problem. let’s transfer all this to the highest political level, using the example of the odb countries, since minsk hosted the summit of this organizations, and emamali rakhmon to a greater extent, sadyr japarov, kasym zhamar takaev and nikol pashinyanyan to a lesser extent, but these are not only the leaders of their countries, but also people with whom alexander lukashenko ate either a wad of salt or at least a couple of kilograms, someone some of them are more likely friends of our president, some are more likely friends, but nevertheless, all of them, some to a greater extent, some to a lesser extent,

are doing what the people hired them for to protect the national interests of their state, then there is, on the one hand, a work question: on the other hand, personal, human relationships with each other. making friends, or at least making friends for the benefit of our countries at this level, is an art that requires exceptional qualities from each participant in the process. are lukashenko and putin friends? if there is friendship in high-level politics, then yes, this is it. do lukashenko and putin, as presidents of countries, say something that is not entirely pleasant for each other to hear, of course, and not only say, but also make corresponding decisions. the simplest example is a nuclear power plant. they say vladimir vladimirovich commissioned the station, thank you, but despite our friendship, you missed the deadline, let’s reconsider the agreements, and putin says quite normally: yes, alexander grigorievich, let ’s discuss, they can definitely separate work issues from interpersonal ones, which is extremely important in politics. but can everyone do this?

this is an unanswered question. and on the eve of the csto summit, lukashenko gathered the power bloc to honestly say the following: he wanted to be. security sphere and listen to those problematic issues that we may have today in relations with members csto. there are problems in the csto, including problems in belarus in relations with csto members. this is also true about lukashenko. speaks and speaks publicly. moreover, in the working office of the president, not only the secretary of state of the security council and the minister of defense, but also the head of the main intelligence directorate, all countries are doing reconnaissance, even if we are talking about partners in all possible alliances, and it seems that this was also such a military-political signal, they say, friends,

colleagues, we have problems and minsk is targeting on friday to discuss them substantively, that’s who exactly spoke about this, about the problems that , let’s be honest, have exposed... its own in ukraine and the collective western pressure on a seemingly collective organization, so the president of belarus, first with his already crowned one, let’s be frank, we need to be stronger and more united, let's be honest, we still don't have enough of this to the maximum, we need to move towards this faster so that it doesn't turn out that if something breaks out somewhere, then we'll wake up and start moving, then that's what actually happened... that some people love alexander lukashenko very much, while others love him a little less, the president of belarus says that some partners, quote , are stormy, that some of our partners are stormy, in public statements in actions of a provocative nature,

first of all, their problem, i will say one thing , if there are complaints, then we need to voice them looking into each other’s eyes, and not... talk through stuffing in the media. and then, in general, the main thing is that not everyone names one of the main reasons for attempting a storm in regarding belarus, although everyone understands everything perfectly well, and these are nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, which returned to the country thanks to lukashenko’s personal decision and his agreements with putin. what is there? in some csto capitals the reaction to this was: “well, why, this will cause discontent in the collective west.” only the task of the csto is not to delight the west, but to protect the territory of the union member countries. but our countries are large, the threats and their level in belarus and kazakhstan are very different, even based on geography. and under different threats require very different

countermeasures. we are the western border of the udkb, and when our union is threatened by nato, then conditionally astana or bishkek, in order to eliminate the threats , they offer to meet with partners to talk, because it’s a couple of hours’ flight from nato to them, at least, and we, and we are also the csto, have a situation radically different, and just sitting down and talking, expecting that we will be heard and listened to, which seems to have never happened since the cold war, this is a level of risk above the acceptable norm. belarus forced nato to hear itself as an instrument that is very clear to this north atlantic aggressor. reproaches about the deployment of russian nuclear weapons in our country are simply absurd , we, i repeat, for the hundredth time are not threatening anyone, we are simply learning diplomatic, so-called etiquette from those who... a global trend, this is the reality of today, only the presence of a powerful weapons guarantee security in

the region and give the right to vote in the international arena. and everything said by the president of belarus in eyes to friends, acquaintances and colleagues in the ddc, this is honestly about problems, and not just about achievements, which of course are also abundant in the organization. but lukashenko knows how not only to be friends in politics, but also to remain the leader of his country in friendship, god grant that everyone in our unions can do this, president of the republic of kazakhstan, kasym zhamart kimelyevich takaev,

i greet you, i’m saying, what lukashenko and putin were talking about tetat, as usual, is the main intrigue, maybe they were just talking as friends about the weather or hockey, this is more than possible, or maybe they were resolving issues as politicians, this is even more likely; after all, the basis of our security is the people who make the decisions. without them, all iskanders, all daggers turn into beautiful demonstration toys , when there is a leader capable of

making a decision, then this is a weapon, my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda, just... one chance to show your strength, here everyone is correct the answer brings the teams closer to the trip, every wrong one to the trip to the construction site 70-80% i answer, but this is sitting at home, from the couch, what was this called gang, if memory serves the black cat, in honor of what holiday, alexander, dozhinki, dozhinki, of course, absolutely right, the ice arena, which is home to the molodechno extraliga club, demonstrate your intellectual potential on our... check, check, check imat

, we don’t play chess, check is the king’s dying state, when there’s just one more action, one more step, and then there will be a magician, this soviet athlete is recognized as the best hockey player of the century according to the international hockey federation, sergei, i i think that vladislavak is absolutely right, the smartest and bravest people gather here, what kind of egg is this? chicken, chicken egg, chocolate, can move, quietly, watch the intellectual and entertaining shows on the tv channel belarus 24. the art of textiles, paintings written with fabric, and current trends in design, which are offered by leading artists and illustrators of belarus from a sketch

on paper to the finished product cultural fashion project, watch this weekend on the belarus 24 tv channel . how long has it been since you held a book in your hands?