alarmist voices were heard in the united states, the russians built a new system of relations with the european union, by the way, just as belarus built a system of trade and economic ties mutually beneficial with the european union, this is a challenge, they said in washington, a challenge for transatlantic solidarity, the russians and belarusians there are eroding transatlantic solidarity together , they affect our european allies, especially germany, we need to do something about it. we need to somehow destroy this system of connections, energy, trade, economic, investment, and this was beneficial to the europeans, it was very beneficial, especially to germany, and in part i see this as the reason why the united states, then the obama administration, in 1414, and then the trump administration with no less fierceness from the colossal bitterness, the biden administration clung to the situation in ukraine and tried

to use it as much as possible to destroy trade and economic ties between russia and the european union, belarus and the european union. first of the conflict in the middle east, ukraine went to second, third role, even on twitter she is in the top 15, has not been present for a long time, and zelensky is increasingly criticized that ukraine’s counter-offensive failed, in this regard there are quite a lot of opinions, including in the western press, like this journalist, i follow the press, yes. that maybe, no, no, yes, and how would the west just carefully merge ukraine, first of all merge zelsky, of course, and will try to come to an agreement with russia directly, about some, let’s say, about some point, o in some territories, i believe that ukraine is a means, it is not a goal, serious investments have been made, tens of billions of dollars have already been spent, and indeed, kiev does not show those results. which

were probably expected from him in washington, if we look at the importance of ukraine, then look at the request that president biden’s administration has now submitted to congress to increase aid to ukraine, military aid, yes, there are more than 60 billion, 62 billion dollars, these are colossal funds that are planned to be spent next year, in the twenty-fourth year, on military assistance to ukraine, if we look at the ratio with the indicators that exist for the planned military assistance to israel, then there is only 14 billion dollars, these are the priorities, you never know what is there on twitter, this is the money that is being invested and for which washington will ask from kiev, ask for results, and what the results may be, here is the failed ukrainian counter-offensive, this is a negative result, so zelsky’s position becomes more...

they will apparently continue to drive the armed forces of ukraine forward , despite the fact that it is clear that they do not have the strength and resources to counter the armed forces of the russian federation, but washington will demand results, because a huge amount of military equipment has been supplied, from all nato countries, that is , next year there will be presidential elections in the united states, and accordingly, the biden administration needs, as i understand it, to this... by november 7, in my opinion, there will be elections there, we need to come with some kind of at least intermediate decision on ukraine, to show that all the money and effort spent were not in vain, as you think, and this too, although for the american voter, of course, this is a much less significant issue on the external political agenda than the situation in the middle east, this also needs to be understood, but in general the american voter, he votes with his wallet, with his heart and wallet, because -

the situation on the labor market, the situation will be much more important, much more important for the american voter in the consumer lending market, what will happen to inflation, what will happen to household incomes, and what will happen to investment processes, what will happen to the stock market? in fact, for the american voter, these things are much more significant, what will be the social system... biden made many promises, has already fulfilled some, has not fulfilled many, what will happen to infrastructure projects, against this background, in fact, questions foreign policy, they are always secondary, although the ukrainian crisis, it is no coincidence that it was given such media coverage on in the west, it was really promoted , including for domestic political purposes, in the united states, in any case, even in america, at some point, a refrigerator can defeat democratic values ​​abroad, and you know, for americans, these are slightly

different shelves in a bookstore closet, uh, because i don't like the refrigerator metaphor, i like the bookcase. still, we must understand that a democratic voter is a person from the middle class, from the middle class, and not necessarily from white anglo-saxon protestants, but even more likely on the contrary, he is a person with social orientations with a certain social reformist fervor, biden as a president is a social reformist, and he is a lot, i have already said that he is a lot. from the point of view of the development of infrastructure and social programs and it is difficult to carry out many things, it has one very big problem: now the american state budget of very significant sizes has reached 6 trillion dollars,

such a budget has never existed in the history of the united states, and at the same time 1.6 three dollars, this is a deficit, a colossal amount, that’s all. background, of course, 60 billion for ukraine is not much, but it is also significant, but it is still money, it is big, it is money, americans know how to count, when i was preparing for the interview , i watched a lot of videos, including on the internet, one of these, we call their people's questions, simple, yes, philistine, people see that america is allocating a lot of money to ukraine, and now huge amounts of money can go to israel, and no less large amounts of aid to taiwan, because on the island. they also warm it up like that seriously. and the question is: won’t it tear? america, is it enough, even though such a large , powerful economy is enough to help on three fronts at once and distribute these crazy amounts of money? well, i would rather talk about whether

the american economy and the american external politics american military-political resources, will they withstand what the biden administration has set its sights on in the long term, because if we look at the american strategic documents and the national security strategy, and most of the pentagon documents that were adopted already under the biden administration, they are focused on long-term systemic, so-called dual containment of russia and china. previously, the tradition of american foreign policy thought, since the time of henry kissinger, it was believed that it was impossible to build confrontational relations with two leading global powers at the same time. russia has become enemy number one for the united states, now, but, but actually in the long term, enemy number

one is china. because china has comparable economic power, china has growing military power and a growing military. i propose , let’s say, a little from the globe to return here to minsk, relations between minsk and washington have been in a very, let’s say, difficult state for many years, and in my opinion, why belarus has been such an irritant for the united states for many years, here is belarus and the president of belarus, belarus is a country that has a clear understanding of its national interests, belarus is a country that is developing quite well, economic, belarus is an ally of russia , having its own view of global processes, having a diversified system of foreign political, foreign economic relations with china, with the islamic republic of iran, with india, with many other countries,

with venezuela, including many countries, which washington views as its opponents, adversaries, well , russia alone is enough here, that’s it. and russia and belarus have a union state, there are deepest allied relations in the military-political sphere, it is clear that belarus has chosen an independent course of development, in washington this of course causes irritation , long-term, constant systemic irritation. washington understands very well that there are sectors of the economy where russia and belarus are very closely interconnected and many things in russia cannot be done without belarusian components, without belarusian ones suppliers, without belarusian partners, they understand this perfectly well, now one of the most popular abbreviations in the media, brix, do you think brix is ​​really the future? brix is club, a club of new leaders of the world economy, and

if we look at the balance of forces in the world economy, we will see that, for example, in oil production, in gas production, countries. especially brix 11, the new expanded brix, this is already more than 50%, even 60% of the world market, if we look at the world food market. then this is more than 55% of the world food market, and so for most sectors, if you look at the total power of the brics countries, otherwise we will see that they are not only comparable with the countries of the group of seven, and in many respects they are superior, and there, in fact, in the west they have partly begun to understand this, so from the group of seven the same americans and europeans are increasingly turning around.

then, of course, very serious work is required here, because all countries have their own interests, multidirectional, somewhere they may even be competitors of the brix countries in relation to each other, but everyone has an understanding that a new polycentric world is being formed, in which brix countries have a bigger role to play, last question, i know that you... wrote a memorandum with the belarusian institute for strategic studies, please tell us a little about what kind of documents these are, what doors and opportunities it opens for you, well, we have been friends with our colleagues from the belarusian institute for strategic studies since their very creation, and i can to say that our colleagues from bc have done a lot of work since 1919, we have great opportunities for holding joint seminars, conferences, situational analyses, at our... institute, at one time, a methodology was developed conducting situational analyzes when we analyze conflict situations, crisis

situations, we are ready to share experience and approaches with our belarusian friends, i am sure that we will also do research projects together, including the preparation of reports that we can send to the leadership of both countries, we have many common tasks, many common problems, i believe that the belarusian institute of strategic studies. this is a dynamically growing think tank that covers, well, a very wide range of topics, i see great prospects here joint research analytical work, that means we will work, we will, fedor genivich, thank you very much for the interesting conversation, thank you. tv channel belarus 24 broadcasts for you around

the clock, don’t switch. our daily task is to talk about belarus in the country abroad . more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to watch projects from our tv channel. so what is belarus like? business and developing, hospitable, bright and festival. generous, picturesque and monumental

sports and team. we tell you not only about significant events, we introduce you to active ones. energetic, inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development. belarus can be different, to understand and feel it, you need to see it with your own eyes. hello, dear tv viewers, belarus 24 tv channel is on air . watch us every day, because we are making belarus closer.

broadcast of the serada on tv channels belarus 1 and belarus 24th anniversary of the capital and region, darya tarasava is with you, good evening this is a short summary of this issue.