the euro has also depreciated a little, its exchange rate is 3.47, for 10 yua they give 4.49 belarusian, for 100 russian 3 rubles and 48 kopecks. and now to the topic of eurasian integration in the union, according to most macroeconomic indicators, there is a positive trend in opinion. the best rates are demonstrated by belarus, armenia and kazakhstan. systematic downsizing efforts have a positive impact on business performance. barriers between countries to implement

innovations. some of them were voiced at a recent meeting of the council of the eurasian economic commission. optimization of procedures transportation, modernization of labeling rules and licenses for export-import in electronic form. alina lapon will tell you everything in order. from customs regulation to international cooperation. there are fifty in total on the agenda. the issues were considered by their deputy prime ministers for 2 days. in addition to discussing the strategic documents of the union, it was the priorities for the further development of integration or work on the external contour. during the meeting, they decided to extend the tariff incentive for transporting electric vehicles until the end of 2025, announced the creation unified customs transit. the practical implementation of the agreement's provisions will make it easier to optimize the transportation procedure, both by minimizing actions.

supervisory services, and by reducing the overhead costs of the business of the union and the third party that has concluded the corresponding international agreement with the union. the formation of an emergency food fund is also being worked on. the russian side made such a proposal in june of this year, explaining the instability in foreign markets. a full-fledged system will be provided operational monitoring of food security, as well as accumulation of reserves in case of shortage of any goods in the markets. as an alternative, it may be proposed that member states form additional stocks of agricultural goods using the mechanisms of an agreement on the rules of release, issuance, circulation of redemption within the union, warehouse receipts of agricultural products. with this option, each country independently determines the list of goods and volumes of reserve formation taking into account the assessment of the situation on the domestic market. it is also at

the discretion of the country to decide how, when and in what market to use these reserves. the council of the eurasian economic commission also approved a new version of the rules for issuing permits for the export and import of goods, which apply non-tariff regulation measures in trade with third countries. this will make it possible to obtain licenses electronically . the rapid development of digitalization dictates the need to introduce such innovations. they are aimed at simplifying bureaucratic procedures, which in turn will contribute to business development. by the way, as noted in the ec, cooperative supplies in the eurasian union are showing positive dynamics. according to the department of industrial policy, in the first half of 2023, cooperative supplies to the eu increased by more than 12% compared to the corresponding period of the previous year. the best rate of increase in cooperation supplies this year is observed in armenia (an increase of 2). 7 times

in belarus an increase of 37.1% and in kazakhstan an increase of 29.5%. in terms of industry, most priority sectors are showing positive dynamics. an increase in volumes was recorded in eighteen industries. yes, the volume of mutual trade in goods between the ias states is growing and new records are certainly a reason for joy. however, the issue is to improve quality control. goods moving across the borders of allied countries is becoming increasingly relevant; innovations in the labeling system were also presented at eec meetings. they include recognized to reduce barriers to ensure freedom of movement of goods in the domestic market. alena lopo - area of ​​interest. and that ’s all for today, look at the area of ​​interest three times a week, tuesday, wednesday and thursday. good luck in your business, see you soon.

the imposed american hegemony, to put it mildly, has fed up everyone, the us pressure is constantly increasing on the countries of the european union, their affairs as poor and dependent, including ukraine in general. already playing too hard, they don’t know whether to send for negotiations, or continue to delay military action, exhausting the enemy, with russia and belarus are completely complicated for the west, stubborn, independent, rebellious , slavs, in a word, the struggle of civilization and

the redivision of the world, what we will come to in the end, who will win and what can be considered our victory, about this today in the program, this is another , i’m with you, ksenia lebedeva, hello! the chief political strategist of the existing world order, who has crossed the century mark, henry kissinger said goodbye to this world last week. it’s time to think about how long the very world order, the seed of which he laid, will last and supported. american supremacy and centrist politics, where. usa, the rest exist to support its livelihoods. we viewed the opening of china as the opening of a new period of geopolitical relations. because it not only opened a second front for the soviet

union and not only threatened the unity of the communist bloc. first, we believed that it explained to the american public that we have our own idea of ​​the world order and that it is not simple. "we don't just protect corner of southeast asia, and that we have our own vision of how countries can relate to each other. secondly, we thought that if we played well, we could achieve a position in which we would be closer to each of the communist rivals than they were to each other. so this was our geopolitical model, and we got it right by keeping each side informed of what we were doing to the other. so over time , the outlines of a new international system began to emerge, but the hole in all of this geopolitical thinking has always been the position of europe. both now and before, the european union is just a bargaining chip, an instrument of the united states, just like ukraine. kissenger was

us secretary of state from '73 to '77 . at this time, there were, so to speak, attempts to improve relations between the united states and the ussr. china, and also end the war in vietnam. for his efforts on the latter issue, he was awarded the nobel peace prize, while kissinger was a supporter of the expansion of the north atlantic bloc and the admission of ukraine in nato and a supporter of sanctions in relations between states, but not personal ones, considered them ineffective and, in fact, a violation of international interaction and interference in the internal affairs of the country. i really don't like the concept of sanctions against individuals because i always think the first question you have to ask as a politician is what are you trying to achieve and secondly what is the takeaway from that, are you trying to achieve some kind of resistance

government, punishing the people you sanction, and what the you will only have an international system if every country punishes people in other countries, how will you stop it then? sanctions, begin to unite and share interests. one of the centers of gravity, for example, has become brix, an interstate informal association of countries with dynamically developing economies: russia, brazil, india, china and south africa. in january 2024 , six more states will join the bloc, including iran and the united arab emirates, which is not a resistance group. sanctions. blackmail, incitement ethnic hatred, dirty tricks used by western political strategists

against economic and political allies, russia and belarus, did not produce results, this is also an example of opposition to hegemony, but they influenced the closest ally of the united states, the european union. in fact, this was the malicious plan of the globalists to remove competitors from the market. through sanctions they slow down their competitors so that they do not produce their goods, services and do not compete with their main competitors. in september twenty-two in swedish the publication publishes an allegedly secret report from the rand corporation, and there the rand corporation writes that the main goal of the conflict between ukraine and russia was not the weakening of russia, even, but... the weakening of europe. the key competitor of the united states of america or anglo-saxon corporations

has always been european companies. now americans are also solving their problems by destroying european corporations. how do they do it? how to destroy any economy of any economy of any enterprise, make incoming resources extremely expensive. in our region, the role of a security account is played by the csto, a collective security treaty organization. the global problems that we are now facing were outlined by our president during the november summit in minsk, with the participation of heads of state and participating countries. we have already been caught up in the whirlwind of changing eras. you and i are witnesses to the destruction of the previous system of international relations. and we... are participants in the breakdown of the existing unipolar, if you like, western-centric model,

there is a gradual transition to multipolarity, complex, dramatic transition. this is due to the fact that western politicians do not want to give up their positions, ignoring the inexorable course of history, which, as we know, cannot be stopped. under the slogan.

geopolitical plates, the united states tried to establish its influence in the territories of the former soviet republics after the collapse of the ussr and the active shift. in ukraine this happened almost immediately. in belarus, the arrival of an attempt at negotiations between the liberal globalist soros and lukashenko. ended in nothing, unlike ukraine. his theories acquired life there, the word democracy, a touch of sarcasm and mistrust. double standards have become visible without a magnifying glass, like the permissiveness of the powers that be. we chose different paths, which is probably why our countries are where they are now. but the soft power of the globalists worked as an imposition of their culture, the american dream. for a long time they tried to impose on us that ours is bad, the soviet one is relics of the past, but

the american one - the western one - is different. i am absolutely convinced that the unity of russians, ukrainians and belarusians is the very civilization that the west has been striving for for centuries to destroy, has been striving to destroy for centuries. unfortunately, for various reasons, he has now managed to drive a wedge, so to speak. straight, so to speak, in the heart, yes, at least, but if not in the heart, then in the leg at least, yes, they undoubtedly, as if yes, have some kind of dividends from this, and this absolutely obvious. based on this, this is what i personally would see as real success, real success, i would see a return of all three peoples to the understanding that they are a great, well, if not a single, then at least a common civilization, which is what they want to fragment, because they are afraid as a competitor, a competitor in the field of meaning,

in the field of worldview, in the field of lifestyle, well , including as a military competitor and as... an economic competitor, that is, roughly speaking, the real success would be not to take kharkov there and not to put a boot on someone's face, yes, the real success would be to return us all to a common understanding that this is our common destiny. the start of a special military operation in ukraine demonstrated to the west, which chose square as an instrument of struggle in confrontation with russia, that if they don’t understand the language of diplomacy, they will explain it on their fingers for those who don’t... grasp it on the fly, here’s identification, and demilitarization, and everything is fair, because long conversations led nowhere, nato did not curb its ardor towards ukraine and did not want to leave it neutral. now ukraine is not that neutral, it is on the threshold of a situation where they abandoned the sailors, and they are waiting

for it only in the three slavic brotherhood, albeit as a prodigal son. victory over the collective west in ukraine. will give a powerful impetus to changes in the global balance of power in favor of the establishment of a polycentric world order, and the united states can only hope that after russia’s victory in the conflict in ukraine they can be forgiven, but that’s another matter. and yaksenia lebezeva was with you, see you in the next program.

telelenova agency represents. in the public domain. we have no secrets from our people. many bastards are in a foreign land and these people are comrades from their native land. and the happy hour has arrived. from argentine and ades, the rajens arrived from the western regions of ukraine and belarus, packed in 1939 years native land in poshukah lepshay doli.

having returned to radzima, the first year for everything, they took a one-time pear aid. and the people who were lost in the light on the crystal of ivan koshar, who do not know the fate of argentina, are returning to their native meats. there is a lot to be done here, it is necessary to publish the yashche adzin kalgasny sviran, this time ivan koshar is busy.

this laudatory moment of ivan gaurylavich kobranets remembers all his life, as he has been searching for a long time in argentina, and as he knows in front of his family pinsk, happy life, practice, education, and no longer a kamunist. city grozna pastel 19-gadovaga blukannya.