the same experience of hungary will begin to make friends with china, with russia, with the arab states. a multi-vector policy for poland is polish national interests, which are dictated by its geography. it’s interesting, how about tuftology. forgive me, how will ipr fit in, yes, for this multi-vector nature. look, if we are talking about poland, we devoted a lot of time to it, of course, and the elections in poland, but there are also a huge number of, say, topics, yes, that are not only closer and more interesting to us, yes, but they have a certain impact , let's say so, the situation, both in belarus, and so , first of all, on society, the so-called...

are, they really love such a section of our history as the belarusian people's republic, at least they think that they know it, so i i want to remind them that this cannot even be called education, this project also printed its passports, distributed these passports, but no one ever recognized these passports.

difficult for europe itself, the european union, when anarchy of documents occurs, yeah, so here i see a certain point that some of these fugitives will try to renounce belarusian citizenship, perhaps so.

broke, many with children, many with something else, that is, if i were the fugitives, i would advise them to return to belarus with a clear conscience, and live according to the laws of our country, think about how to reintegrate into belarusian society and not living in dreams and imagination divorced from reality, their main thing... the problem is that in

the twentieth year they imagined themselves to be those who they actually were not. as for this precedent, what is it for? will it lead? a split among the fugitives is already taking place for reasons of funding and political ambitions. it's clear. moreover, let us also speak frankly, fugitives are not the agenda of belarusian politics today. and not only belarusian. and not only belarusian. today they are on the sidelines, both on the information agenda and on the political agenda. are not particularly interesting to anyone, and after a single voting day, and even more so the presidential elections of 25, the fate of the fugitives is the fate of such a character, about whom few people speak today will remember how mr. semyon sharetsky, he

resumed himself as president in exile in some ninety years, he was also a fugitive, no one will remember him today, he is a political corpse. now we see how this whole machine of fugitives is gradually disintegrating, like this same political corpse, but he is still on artificial respiration, and some devices are connected to him in the form of grants, in the form of some kind of information resources, in the form of houses there in warsaw vilnius, but sooner or later they will completely refuse.

to the parliament, to the councils, to the all-belarusian people's assembly, i am sure that this is a question that worries many, because this is our future, but i am increasingly convinced that it is much more important to understand who definitely should not end up in them, so in your opinion, who? our parliament is traditionally formed by a majoritarian system, if we say...

and our parliament should always be different in that we have a lot of meaning, and there is no circus, we have a belarusian state parliament. this is our main thing, probably philosophical task.