at any moment they can be raised on alarm by the nato leadership, without the approval of their national, that is, parliaments, governments, sent to any point in the world to carry out any tasks there. it’s time to call all these american concepts and military documents a piece of writing, if you know how americans start wars around the world. retired american general oysley clark spoke about this. having gone to the pentagon on business in 2001, he accidentally found out in he told me that we had made a decision, we were starting a war with iraq, it was somewhere in the twentieth of september. i say: we are going to fight with iraq, but why? he said, "i don't know, he said, ' i think they know what they're doing . ' found, they simply decided to start a war with iraq. they knew that there were no guns in iraq, but after september 11 and the fall

of the towers, society needed to show a beautiful victory, hence the frightening powel with a test tube in the sovben and a million dead iraqis from american bullets and shells. you know, the most important thing in all such adventures that the united states organizes is that they are still confident in their absolute irresponsibility, that is, they believe that no one will ever hold them accountable.

we don't want stability in iran, iraq, syria, lebanon or even saudi arabia, we want things to change in those countries. the question of the day is not whether to destabilize. on how to do it. let's return to our general clark. his entertaining story has its own continuation. some time later, he again met with a high friend in the pentagon and again learned about the bloody plans. so i visited him again a few weeks later. at this time we were already bombing afghanistan. i asked him, are we still going to go to war with iraq? he replied, it's much worse. and he took the document from the table. he explained that he had just received a change.

the white house fought in at least three dozen countries, and if you add the secrets of cia operations, coups, color revolutions and civil wars behind which washington stood, the figure will grow significantly, at first they hid behind the fight against the spread of communism, but also after the collapse of the ussr. appetites have not become smaller,

ukraine and yemen are also in the treasury following fresh tracks. the american political class, the american elite, has a fixed idea. this idea is global leadership, global hegemony, domination. one american publicist said the following phrase : every 10 years we need to find some small country and give it a good whack in order to demonstrate to the whole world that our words do not differ from our deeds. no matter what the americans write in their documents, no matter how much they engage in verbal balancing act, the cornerstone for many, many years has been the manic desire to dominate the whole world, so that those around them will obediently click their heels and carry out any orders of their masters. yes, global hegemony is increasingly coming into question. the unipolar world is showing serious cracks, but american politicians still believe in the mantra of their exceptionalism. 2014, barack obama, us president. i do with all my heart.

i believe in us exceptionalism. 2016, hillary clinton, us presidential candidate. the usa is an exceptional state. and no documents, concepts, agreements, international law. they will be a guideline for a rules-based world order, the americans have always had their own. the bombing of yemen is a clear illustration of the fact that the source of law for the white house is not the un charter, but the geopolitical interests of washington. after all , an attack on a sovereign state was once again called a necessary and proportionate measure. we are returning home. on january 16 , the president held a meeting of the security council in lens military doctrine and concept. from safety. negative forecasts about the situation in the world are coming true. last year there were 183 regional conflicts on the planet, 57 of which were in the hot phase. only a fool today can not see or hear what happens to the state after the detonation of man-made charges from the outside. you know

the situation around belarus as well as i do. key directions for transforming modern risks, challenges and threats. and as it usually happens, there are no sanctions from the civilized west followed. the duty officer stated as if nothing had happened. unfortunately, we have returned to a time when military force became the main argument in building

interstate relations. remember the first part of the program? so, it seems that the military documents of belarus are of a defensive nature, the basis of our life is creation. and not destruction, sovereign belarus has never invaded someone else’s territory, never started conflicts, or violated borders. as for the draft new military doctrine, it fully takes into account what is happening dramatic changes in the military-political situation, new military dangers, and updated approaches to determining the nature of modern military conflicts, in the interests of developing adequate response measures for the armed defense of the country. the world is changing, it is important to constantly clarify. views on the theory and practice of military policy, among the important innovations is a clear description of threats and from which countries they come, but enemies, goals and other aggression, like western partners, are not spelled out there, both documents will become closer to each other to a friend. today

, the conditions have already arrived when it was necessary to rework the military doctrine, it has become targeted, we clearly name the sources of military threats in our country, based on this we... clearly built the measures that the state will take when risks of challenges and threats, we have clearly defined and communicated the views of the republic of belarus on the use of tactical nuclear weapons stationed on our territory. remember the words of the president: we don’t need someone else’s, but we won’t give up ours either. over the years the formula is becoming more and more relevant and today, unfortunately, being just a peaceful country is not enough. the planet is getting hotter, more dangerous and scarier. if not you , then they can you, under various pretexts, without condemnation by the international community, so be able to defend yourself, the sad trend of the 21st century, the era of big wars is not a thing of the past, but poland, lithuania, latvia and ukraine, unfortunately, have doctrines vassals and

satellites. their policy in the military sphere is aimed primarily at strengthening and promoting nato interests, containing russia and confronting it. about own interests there. is prohibited, everything goes in the development of the american doctrine, where the basis of everything is the promotion of us economic interests and the maintenance of a global order based on liberal values, as they say, nothing personal, just business. a clear projection of american interests, we see here in their concepts and strategic plans related to the state defense order that they have, the movement of american corporations, we see how the americans are imposing their products. we see how americans bury common european defense projects, well, relatively speaking, for example, the eurofiter tyfun with the creation of such a pan-european fighter aircraft , which has already been made by the eurofiter company, can, in principle , use this aircraft until the forties, but nevertheless

, the americans are imposing the f35 aircraft on everyone, essentially putting an end to development of this concept in the future, now the americans are putting an end to tank production in europe, they... are practically destroying the joint project of the germans and the french to create such a single european tank in the future and forcing the poles and other countries to purchase american tanks or south korean ones. that’s why here, of course , they actually consider europe not even as partners, but as some kind of raw material. and one more quote from the president: the world is on the verge of tremendous events. we have taken our place, but maintaining it, apparently, is only possible with calm, high-quality work and a cool head, especially when the entire planet is walking on very thin ice. i hope this will be clear to you now. happily.

our country is not a passing yard, with one on the one hand, we are in the center of europe, on the other hand , the safety of our citizens comes first. and here we need an extremely competent balance. last year, citizenship legislation underwent significant changes. at the same time , i would start our conversation with a completely non-fictional incident, like a couple of months ago in the agin department. i personally saw and heard, right?

kata, where it is written that if you go to belarus, you may stay there or not return back, and in fact, this is the information war that is carried out in regarding belarus, in fact, on the one hand, of course, it is very, very unpleasant for us, because the truth is turned around, where lies are said, and so on and so forth, everything that the country does for ordinary citizens, for foreigners who stay on the territory of the country, this is the freedom that they see here, the security that they feel on our roads. the social package that a foreigner who moves to a permanent place of residence receives is also not

shown, but only horror stories are shown, therefore, ordinary lithuanians, yes, ordinary lithuanians who are on the territory of the country, they see the attitude of officials of the entire vertical of power that we have built in relation to solving everyday problems, they understand that these are completely different things, they understand that they, of course, live in an absolutely information vacuum, and even statistics show that we now have only 160,000 permanently residing foreigners and 62,000 of these are persons who have a temporary residence permit in the country according to the results work in the twenty-third year, this is a fairly large figure, that is, foreigners are trying to come to the country. strive to obtain a permanent residence permit, and every year we issue more than 10,000 permits only to new, in quotes , citizens, while foreign citizens, this is also a lot, yeah, okay, then let's follow the algorithm, yes, that's how to get it, you know, girls love write on instagram, it’s hard to find, it’s easy to lose, yes, but what about belarusian citizenship today, under what conditions is it easy to lose, yes, it’s very

it is difficult to acquire, but to lose it, well, it is also not easy, yes, but it is also not very good. you can lose it or lose citizenship of belarus under clearly defined conditions, that is, if a citizen of the republic of belarus actually, that is, made a decision to enter military service, serve in the police in another state, then in fact there is an automatic loss of the civil republic of belarus. previously, the legislation of our country also had an aspect that was related to the fact that if a citizen of belarus acquires foreign citizenship, then he also loses his citizenship of belarus. then they legally considered that this would be somewhat undemocratic, taking into account the general scope of departure of belarusian citizens to third countries, and this... destinations on the territory of belarus with all the ensuing consequences, this also indicates that the person loses the citizenship of our country, because citizenship is such a legal connection between belarus and the citizen himself,

which provides for mutual rights and obligations if the person does not fulfill his duties, he cannot be considered a citizen. well, the list of conditions, yes , under which one can lose belarusian citizenship, is now clearly defined, but after the twentieth year there was no need to expand these conditions, when a person very specifically calls for sanctions against the country, yes, they openly provoke for that for war to come to belarus, to put it mildly, yes, he speaks out, well, completely, let’s say, not just impartially, inappropriately in relation to belarus, in relation to her.

political system in relation to other countries of peoples, but you need to understand that only various actions, they should entail or lead to criminal liability, because the legislator considered that if these changes were made in july last year, that initially we were deprived of citizenship or considered the fact of loss of citizenship in relation to naturalized only foreigners who actually take the oath, now, who gave obligations that they would comply with the constitution, legislation, but in subsequently took any action. and we have never applied this norm, but in fact, when some of the belarusians , in fact, who may no longer be considered belarusians, since they lead such a lifestyle and such a policy towards our country, commit various actions, including criminal crimes and are brought first of all to the criminally responsible territory of our country in the established legal order, and stay outside the country, then in relation to

this category of persons, of course it will be necessary a procedure has been initiated for the loss of the name of a civil republic, you know, i condemn... quite simply in our legislation there is a concept of causing damage, and by one’s actions, roughly speaking, when a person achieves through one’s actions, causing colossal damage to belarus economically, yes, that is, when sanctions entail certain consequences, and he showed unrestrained, and such active work, and in order for these sanctions to arise as much as possible, yes, he initiated them, let’s say, he or she and... this initiative led to the fact that some enterprise or some enterprises in belarus suffered, and this can be counted, calling such a person a citizen is already criminal, the question is that if there is a very specific relationship, lawyer, and between an action and a negative result, consequences , this should definitely be considered an offense, and a criminal

offense, therefore , the state has created an appropriate system that gives a legal assessment. i understand that we are not called legal for nothing a state, but still a soft rule-of-law state, and well, a rule-of-law state, because only at will, because citizenship is still this, it’s actually quite a serious institution, which was said...

let’s say 5 years of integration into society, including a law-abiding lifestyle, so that a person is not brought to administrative responsibility and does not have, much less criminal liability on

the territory of the country, it acts impeccably and by the competent authorities, at every stage it is checked, and in fact, that is, in fact, a citizen must earn citizenship of the republic of belarus, not so, because he meets some tracing paper or criteria, because he knows russian and wants to be a citizen, this does not apply in our country, he must actually live 5 years manifest. himself in relation to society, integrate into society, know the state language, comply with the law and be worthy of the republic of belarus, because by then accepting the attraction, solemnly swearing, he actually becomes a full member of society and must, including at a certain moment, if necessary, he gives the corresponding obligation for this, to go serve the people of the republic of belarus to defend our country, if necessary. acquiring citizenship and acquiring a homeland are two different things; do ukrainians and others become ours? refugees, why is belarusian assistance not limited to issuing only passports? in fact, probably still acquire citizenship and acquire a homeland in our situation, these are most likely

synonyms, because in fact, well, we see the experience of other countries that throw away their passports, because there are some golden investments, there are some prerequisites for improving the democratic situation, but persons who acquire citizenship there, receiving the appropriate passport, they do not always acquire a homeland, because they use. and with this passport, sometimes in a mercantile situation in our country , in fact, a person who acquires citizenship of belarus, he acquires a new homeland, because the person, firstly, well, i can’t say that he will suffer for this, but having actually lived for 5 years in the country according to the qualification of gray hair, he already shows himself as a worthy member of society, as integrated into society, as a working person with all the ensuing consequences, therefore, in fact, in our situation these are completely equivalent moments, because in fact he is in including accepting the attraction, as i say ready. then serve with allegiance to the people of the republic of belarus and undertake corresponding obligations with all the ensuing consequences, which is why we have naturalization figures, of course, as for example, many would like or, compared with

the russian federation, not very large, but by naturalizing, let’s say approximately 4-500 people per year, we guarantee, and we have conducted relevant research on this issue more than once, well, we understand how law-abiding the new citizens really are for us, to the extent they pose a threat to us, we checked their respectable or law-abiding behavior, that is, checking each one. subsequent, well, i’ll actually say on the subject of compliance with the law bringing to administrative criminal charges responsibility, so i can say publicly that no more than 3% of naturalized citizens who have become full-fledged citizens subsequently commit criminal or administrative violations, and this is actually a drop in the ocean, so they acquire a homeland here and value this most importantly , because it is clear that upon becoming a full-fledged citizen of belarus, you acquire a whole range of rights, not only your blue passport, but that, probably, that new country that... probably the social package that every new person receives citizen, that is, people acquiring our citizenship, they also have a quality mark, and in the year of quality this is absolutely true, that is, we can

say about it, well, in fact, that is, this is a quick procedure for them, it is not complicated bureaucracy, but it provides for a huge range of verification measures, ranging from activity on social networks to participation in protest events and everything else.

exists to obtain citizenship - to obtain citizenship even in principle does not exist for obtaining a residence permit , yes, that is, it is like a stage that goes before citizenship, in fact, if you have invested 150,000 euros in the economy of the republic of belarus, up to 150,000 euros, then you can receive the corresponding residence permit, with us actually every year we issue about three or four permits for permanent residence to investors, these are those who invest in a specific enterprise of the republic of belarus and want and want, most importantly , to obtain a permanent residence permit, but to trade citizenship... on a different principle, but citizenship of belarus and not buy, but many countries are going a little bit , the institution is quite stable and persistent, so i think that in the near future such even thoughts on this matter will not even be beautiful, i know that belarus has almost the longest maternity leave for

a child, 3 years old. which, as it turned out, very much attracts foreign women, this is an unexpected fact for me, really, but what we don’t yet know about the privileges of our own citizenship, which can be voiced, for example, or need to be voiced, well, these are not only the privileges of one’s own citizenship, let’s say, figuratively speaking, a person who even receives the status of resident or citizenship, if he marries a citizen of belarus and then they give birth, then the child actually becomes a citizen of belarus upon birth from a joint marriage with a citizen of belarus and even regardless of the place of birth.

for six months there is even in some countries , then there are no free social institutions, no free medical care, no social support for mothers and children, and most importantly, there is no even such patronage from medical institutions in regarding adult children , there is no such school education, no, and you know , when we evaluate and consider this huge package, we understand that new citizens receive and become full-fledged members of society and want to become only because we provide sufficiently large social protection, they specifically want to give birth here, they specifically want to move here , and yes, and this is also a trend, it exists, well, it’s a good trend, well , look, aleksevich, for many years belarus has been very loyal to the presence citizenship of another country, or it is visible for residence with our citizens, well, at the same time, we do not provide for dual citizenship in our country, some such incident has a certain right, but now i understand that

such belarusians... have a new duty, namely to report about having another citizenship, the question is how to do it correctly, and how will it be revealed, and how many of them are there already who warned, or rather informed about this? yes, actually such an interesting question, you correctly said that in 2002, sorry, we removed the norm, according to which in 2002 we took the norm when a citizen of belarus, having actually acquired foreign citizenship, lost it automatically.

without going through the appropriate registrations, he is located outside of belarus, and in fact , even then the idea crept in that it was necessary to introduce the appropriate obligations so that the citizen would submit a declaration about the presence of foreign citizenship in order to...

the reluctance to report this at all, then there are no desire to inform the competent authorities about whether they have foreign citizenship. yes , at present this, of course , is not an offense, but the legislator has also thought about this, and the competent authorities of the republic of belarus are also thinking about it, so when it appears, we are now

working together with interested parties on this issue so that everything - to introduce appropriate responsibility, because there is a duty to inform citizens, some law-abiding citizens, thank them very much, actually fulfilled this duty, someone thinks to stay on the sidelines or not report it anyway. the age of modern technology, the age of total control at certain points, as if control over an individual, this is quite easily revealed, so if they think that they will avoid the need to notify our competent authorities of the presence of foreign citizenship or become united, then they are very deeply mistaken, in any case , when there is corresponding responsibility, then citizens will be held administratively liable for yes, well, let’s say it generally exists in the russian federation she introduced criminal liability for this in the russian federation .

refuse the pole card, because

it is clear that the status of a state civil servant who is a voluntary employee or the status of a certain official who has access to state secrets, the presence of a foreign document is unacceptable, therefore the person must voluntarily and voluntarily renounce this document, and through the competent organs and... and this will not be a limitation, but in fact the person is not will be able to simply exercise, having a foreign document, a whole series of probably his rights that are provided for by law, that is, for example, he cannot gain access to state secrets, cannot become a civil servant, cannot become a deputy, and at all levels of government, any levels, including local councils, including local councils, that is, now let us register, except for citizens of the russian federation, of course, citizens of the russian federation, according to our electoral code, can be deputies of local authorities, yes that is. those people who are applying for a deputy mandate now, it doesn’t matter, local councils, regional councils, yes, there is minsk city, the house of representatives, everyone will be checked, if they are registered as candidates, we can

say for sure that he does not have dual citizenship he doesn’t have a pole card, and he doesn’t have dual citizenship and doesn’t have a pole card, well, you have to understand that this is not only, we check not only based on the information that citizens provided us voluntarily, when... they declared their presence foreign citizenship, internal affairs bodies and diplomatic service bodies also have other sources of information that confirm that both persons have the corresponding foreign citizenship, so while there is no responsibility, information...

acquires a pole's card, he gives the corresponding obligations, including including loyalty to the people of the republic of poland, he is obliged to know the constitution there, to fulfill a number of other formalities, and in fact, he is given buns; he is given buns by itself territory of poland, but there are no questions, including he can get a good visa there and a simplified procedure for naturalization of citizenship, but for a citizen of the republic to fight, i at least think this is my point of view, this is unacceptable and in fact, therefore the state understands the threats very well and the risks from all this, and is taking a number of steps in order to...

stagger on the 16th, 23rd, and you have

a relatively real number of those who left the country after the twentieth year for political reasons, taking into account families, well a figure that you can actually operate on, look, again, you can’t say political motives, not political motives, that is, let’s say when the relocation of it specialists took place and is happening, these are political motives, no, these are issues related to sanctions, we actually, that is ... the competent authority, in fact , with the help of information resources, quite clearly has information about those persons who are not employed in the economy and who, in a certain period of time, left the territory of the republic of belarus, including with our family members, who under certain circumstances are not on the territory of the country and we can of course say that we and we know everyone, but let’s say that it was a departure for political reasons or not for political reasons, now it’s not always correct, that is , we are actually saying yes due to the fact that, as i say, everyone’s information resources cannot be counted. of course, shouting about it is not entirely convenient for us, but in 2021, 2022

, more than 2000 people left the territory of belarus citizens, that is, these are various reasons, or a type of income, or in fact the relocation of it specialists, members of their families, and so on and so forth, that is, of course, a lot, because this is a working-age population, but on the other hand, the state is always open to them, we we have never put obstacles in the way of the return of our own citizens and we are saying that please, if you have committed a criminal offense, that is... some kind of administrative or criminal liability or cannot return to the territory of the country, but no one is preventing return to these citizens, please , so that they do not generate any numerous fakes about the fact that yes , they are scared on purpose, in fact, they are scared on purpose, so that they themselves do not understand that what their state, when let’s say, again for example in last year changed the mechanism for issuing foreign passports to its own citizens, it did not change... because it wanted, again, for all permanent residents to return to the territory of the country,

because the sanctions policy of the european union also does not allow diplomats to quickly to satisfy the aspirations of our citizens regarding the replacement of passports, therefore, everyone has decided that everyone should now receive passports on the territory of belarus, and we are happy to issue them, and there are no obstacles, the citizen arrived promptly, received a biometric passport or an ordinary passport and returned to the country of citizenship, no bureaucracy, no responsibility, no horror stories if there is nothing clear about it. if there are no criminal claims against him. look, the son is not responsible for his father.

wants to come, the procedure , again, for checking his affiliation is in effect in every diplomatic mission of which institution, including at checkpoints at state borders, if he arrives even after 5 years with an invalid passport, then a border service officer, having carried out an appropriate check on a number of buchoty, yes, according to the vase, will make a decision on the admission of a person to the territory of the country, or he will say that, well, that is, you need to get certification, because the document is expired there is no identity, there is no similarity, and your biometric data is also not in the information resource, but this is not even an individual approach, and this is probably ... an approach in relation to all citizens who currently live outside of belarus and each of them is not deprived constitutional right to return to the territory of the country, he can do this, but the only thing is that he must have a documenting identity, and he must not understand that he will lose the citizenship of the republic of belarus only by certain of his actions, well, you understand perfectly well why i asked the question, but now many parents may

simply not give it, perhaps, well, in the sense that they will not take any action to ensure that their children, who are now abroad with them, receive this identity card , that is, yes...

he will receive an appropriate education, grandparents, even if there is no one, he will still be, no matter how forgotten by the state, here, i’ll just say as an example, we have cases when the competent authorities foreign countries they deported belarusians who had not been in the country for more than 20 years, who sometimes did not even speak russian, the state lends a shoulder to even these belarusians, accepts them into the country, registers them clearly at their place, well, unfortunately, a list without a specific place of residence , but this is in the first stage and provides all the social guarantees that...

blockades and the leadership of neighboring countries, they tried to ensure this, yes, through personal contact, personal communications, that’s even the most fashionable today marketer, he understands that word of mouth is a great tool for really forming your opinion, but this is how you think it works, look, if only our neighbors were in kovych, word of mouth works great, if only our neighbors . did not close the checkpoints, then we would have had an even higher figure, but seeing about this and enclosing their own citizens with fences and saying that by hanging horror stories at checkpoints, reducing the number of checkpoints, reducing communications, they create for them there are special artificial barriers

so that citizens do not convince by their own experience, by their own example, that no one is persecuting them here, there is clear legislation. committed an administrative violation, you will be held accountable , if you want to go to our belarusian store, if you want to buy fuel at a gas station, please, there are no problems, no discrimination, no one, no one, for being a lithuanian or a pole or a latvian, puts any pressure on you. then obstacles, no one punishes you more harshly, to treats you exactly the same as an ordinary citizen, your neighbor, who has always been a neighbor to us, and no political realities affect this now, so people see it, post a lot of videos, are on social networks, there is a whole group in general... even moving to belarus for permanent residence, where the people moving exchange some problematic issues, they are also very happy, because they see the real, real picture, they see the real relationship, they see... really a completely different world which they draw there, they see, and they see respectable and good relations

on the part of belarusians towards these same tourists, therefore the number, if there were more checkpoints, then the number of tourists would be an order of magnitude greater, especially since the visa-free regime applies to citizens of third countries on the border, this is both the grodno and brest regions, and is still valid for citizens of other european countries through the territory of the minsk-2 national airport, there are also more than one, more than tens of thousands there.

there are corresponding risks, but in any case , our experience of working on, therefore, the relevant election campaigns suggests that all the information resources that work in this area are probably the employees who work at checkpoints, who work on the territory countries can identify, including potential violators, potential extremists, persons who pursue theoretical goals, and that is , some cases on the territory of the country, they have shown that law enforcement agencies they work quite intensively and effectively, therefore they are respectable in this regard.

this is a holiday, elections, for us this is a holiday , come and see what it is, what for us that we invite everyone, please, international observers who are normal observers, to look at all this, we are open to this, and the security authorities, of course , at this time it goes into enhanced mode in order to increase activity and so that the elections are normal for ours. for our population it was just a holiday, but not because we have closed the borders, but we are holding some kind of event for ourselves. and we have an open border with russia, yes, in fact, yes, a single space as well. is it possible to say that the decisions that have been made to date, the databases that have created information resources, i mean the databases of law enforcement agencies and so on, customs authorities, border guards, they are sufficient to clearly understand that is the external border of our two states.

the circuit works and, moreover, it works as if entry of foreign citizens, and exit of citizens of third countries, but of course we consistently carry out this.