no, the weekend is over, first the meeting of the two presidents at several events, then vgs monday. let me borrow the words of our president, polish the agenda: our sacred business is with you. well, let's take a swing, you and i. the presidents talked for more than 8 hours, and also opened the arena, paid honor to veterans, and virtually flew to antarctica. what about you personally? what do you think is the most important thing today for polishing alliance relations? well, you said the phrase: polish ours with you, so the main thing here is not to polish, ours with you, that is, these are two leaders who determine the future of our state today, and since in russia this part of vladimir putin’s election events, this vgs coincides with the election period, they seem to show us: look, this is the trajectory, the next 7 years await you there, putin is guarantees, and we , for our part, also guarantee that belarus will fulfill certain...

agreements, this is the only way it works in the cis, that is, if the leaders have good relations with each other, there will be agreements, there will be an end result, if they are not there, then when there is a change of power , everything falls apart, look how it was in moldova or in other countries, and where we have such a guaranteed continuity of power, there will be all these long-term projects, because money can be distributed , but where is the guarantee that some strangers will not take advantage of this later, for example, and the fact that the presidents have developed such relationships is the most important thing in our integration, if these were conditionally other people, it would already be , i think it's a little worse, so here it is the main thing is that there is this contact, it has not been lost, moreover, since the military operation, trust has grown, probably at the maximum level there in all 20 years, so this is great, of course, and various kinds of informal signs spoke about this, who is in favor there driving a car, how it all happened, this is important in diplomacy, but of course smart people understand everything. andrey vladimirovich, economy, trade turnover is record high, 54 billion and growing. russia is the largest investor, more than 2,500 russian. the company operates in belarus,

such figures were announced, yes, at this meeting, and belarus is increasingly exploring the russian market, taking into account the sanctions, is this process of deepening integration dynamic enough, or do you still see reserves? we have a very different situation with russia, for russia the west expected that sanctions would be a factor in destabilizing capital, first of all, it would feel bad, it would be opposed to the authorities, it turned out exactly the opposite, we saw it all, yes, but it turns out that our belarusian companies are not allowed to submit to government orders, we have different industrial policy, in recent years we have been trying to create a unified industrial policy, today we are getting to this point, if it happens, you understand, it’s not just a bilateral agreement with a specific governor, but as it happens today, it will already be access to the level tenders, this is completely different money, different opportunities, and there are other things in the military-industrial complex, so work is going on in this regard. but the following

question also arises: let’s say we have formally equal conditions on paper, but what kind of the cost of such products, because it depends on the cost of electricity, on the cost of gas, while the military operation is going on, we have a fixed price for gas for 3 years, then we will supposedly have some kind of single energy market, but for now this is a question, as the president said , he has not yet been taken on the agenda, that is, when we also have , let’s say, some kind of parity in energy resources, then we will be in real equal conditions, but for now we, let’s say, are working in terms of precisely creating at least a formal ...

other conditions have developed there, and if we enter the russian market, then everything will be fine here for business and for our public sector too, so today it is, of course, the locomotive of our trade turnover. well, our belarusian companies today are able to, well, let’s say, increase volumes to the required level. the market in russia for some items has really become much more tasty, if i can call it that, it has become free, some niches have become free, to the extent that we are able to replace this as conversion. when you don’t have a military operation, you only have the opportunity to produce cars there, conditionally, when you have a military operation, you are forced to redistribute something, and here space is freed up for the belarusian civilian industry, to finish something, and maybe something can be done for the military-industrial complex to free up the civilian industry there, that is, the questions would seem to be very simple, bearings, for example, yes, you know, for example, it turned out that for tanks to turn the turret there are no manufacturers of these bearings, except for our belarusian plant, that is, until there was this military operation, there were enough of these bearings

, now everyone needs them, it turns out that this is how it all works, so the demand is there, it generates supply for us, including us, so i i think that as long as this situation persists, it is of course bad there from the point of view that there may be a rapid onset of peace, but as long as it is as it is, we are using it, i think, quite successfully, well, this is the magic word import substitution, it was said again and so active enough this meeting, these are the niches in which, in your opinion , we can cooperate, look, we have experience in assembling, for example, screwdriver-mounted chinese cars, we had experience in assembling screwdriver-mounted swiss electric trains, if we, for example, assemble russian airplanes here, yes, what was said, then the question again is what will be... this aircraft, that is, if we simply provide our hands and power there, yes, to assemble something, that’s one thing, but it’s better, of course, to do our belarusian units and put them there, it will a completely different profit, and the russians, i think , today agreed with us on these key positions, that is, it is clear that they are loaded with their orders, but we can also do a lot for military

aircraft and not for military ones, so our aviation enterprises there, for example, it is more difficult to make an airplane than a car, this is a unique experience, they have just such experience, it turns out that the situation with cars may have been a little more difficult. with airplanes , on the contrary, it will be easier, if you take ours, this is a completely different type of product, well look, there’s our arz 558, it ’s upcoming, i know, i worked in syria, for example, that is, there is a certain experience that was even before this military operation, there orshi are helicopters, well, all this is also in demand today, and just this is where the main added value is formed, in the nineties , when all these enterprises were closing, you produced a gas turbine there, some kind of engine for a tank, yes, and then they say you produce saucepans, but what kind of saucepan will have the added value and what kind will it be? great, even if there is, i repeat , a civilian plane there, and not a military one, we will certainly fill our budget, everyone needs this too today, and the market has become free, thanks to western companies, that is, under other conditions, of course, this would have been impossible, but otherwise we will compete with boeing, this is very interesting, that is

, when we talk about the production of joint aircraft, it is not only about moving from point to point, these are definitely components, this is the most important thing that we can produce, i think, almost well, if not all, then a lot. microelectronics, again, which exist , it doesn’t matter that it’s very good , the main thing is that it’s ours, so that there’s no foreign stuff there, which if something happens will land the plane, for example, where it’s not needed, they sell us equipment, yes , which is unknown how everything is built there , whether everything is safe there, and we produce a little worse , maybe in our integral, but here it is its own, and for rockets, for airplanes, you know, there are blocks that are used here and there, you know, i say for now, because with in the early nineties, indeed, the entire policy of the west was directed. so that we don’t produce anything ourselves, so that we buy everything, they’ll give us everything, they say, we ’ll give you everything, you don’t need to bother with this topic, that’s why we’ve really lost the civil aircraft industry, because soviet planes flew, they flew great, to no one it wasn’t bad, well, just like

microcircuits, this is not a question that we don’t know how to do and won’t learn if necessary. only for our viewers we choose the best routes, where it is better to appreciate the available ones and be proud of it, because there is no second lead like this in any european country, and we set off on an exciting journey, products created by local craftsmen were in great demand throughout europe, ivan the terrible himself could not resist bykhov.

and the fact that they can do this, the world is balancing on the brink of the third world war,

it is going on, in fact, it is just going differently, it is a hybrid war, but events can develop like dominoes, today not a single expert, not a single politician, can predict what will happen in this crisis the united states is to blame, they promised us in 1991 that they would ensure peace and security throughout the entire planet, they failed with this leadership, it all started, well, so to speak. in ukraine there is already the middle east, yemen, ecuador, coups in africa, all conflicts around the world will be reset, and this boomerang will definitely reach europe. don’t miss on the belarus 24 tv channel

. incomparable resources and capital with russia, that is, there is more money there, more personnel, more material base, and if they are more invest, then it is clear that they will have greater influence on such a holding, if we are talking purely about commerce, if we are still talking about some kind of diplomatic position, then there should be a beginning of parity, as this happens in diplomacy, that is, two control centers, some kind of joint decision, well, let’s imagine, conditionally, yes, a rut war, a gas war, a milk war, anything could happen and has happened, remember the last 15 years, in which case, what is our holding? will perform what position, will there be a russian position, will there be a position belarusian, it will be some kind of half

-hearted one, or it won’t exist at all, or we need to do something so as not to lead to such a dispute at all, so the task, of course, is not just to put out some kind of fire, yes, but the task is to stop the risks that occur in our integration relations, and the union holding, as i understand it, should work more on the external counter, conditionally we set the task there to work in ukraine, work in poland, work there in the usa, some task is cut down and then our conditionally tv channels there they're working on it, it won't happen here conflict of interest. accepted only now, all these dairy , as you say, ruts and meat wars, yes , they really were, and it’s stupid not

to admit it or not remember it, but that was before the twentieth, when we were taught a little that together we could cope with any task, and since there is parity of the two countries and equivalence, yes, equality of the two countries, regardless of size, it is obvious that in matters of building a holding company, this is the equivalence and importance of the smaller side, which...

if not the most important direction on present day. the meeting of presidents took place on memorable dates, right? lifting the blockade of leningrad. the heroic past is the cornerstone that unites us with the russians. do you see some symbolism in this? have we ever experienced this? yes, 80 years ago, then we will survive all the economic problems, yes, and the information blockade, the economic blockade and any sanctions, well, we will survive, but st. petersburg is... a very difficult city, russia is the second capital, sentiments in moscow, in st. petersburg strongly differ from the mood in the rest of deep russia, when we talk from the rostrum about the blockade, about the common military memory, we saw what the reaction was in the rest of big russia, with a bang, simply, that is, people are close to it, it’s understandable, our belarusian president coincides completely with the big russia that exists, but the capital and st. petersburg - the second capital - this, again, is a very

specific audience, and there, for example, there were certain information wars there against governor beglov, we by the way, all the time we support when the president... comes, and there they tried to pump him up very much, when any news feed results in the fact that we are working against the authorities, the important thing is not that the president came to us, told us something about the blockade, they themselves know everything about the blockade , the task is to support the government that is friends with us, with whom we have great relations , where we will perhaps build ports, everything will be even better, yes, this is the internal agenda in these large cities, it also interests our enemy , ukraine first of all, there are americans, they are trying this is the population to pump, so what is being created for the rest of russia and the typical conditions that have...

i will say that throughout the world today there is a unique situation when politics is influenced by several generations of different ages at once, conventionally this is as many as five, 70 years old, 60, 50, 40 and even 30, everyone makes some decisions at the same time, some more, some less, well, look , for example, at the value picture of a person who is 50 years old today, 55, he has gone through a breakdown , which means there is a system of socialism, which first they called it good, then bad , it was stagnation, then perestroika, yes , perestroika was good, it turned out that this was also something bad, then an explosion of nationalism, it turns out that the soviet union is bad, we need to build some kind of separate system, then this is also bad, we are building something sovereign there, so it turns out that a person who survived the breakdown of four different systems is being offered today during his time, let’s build some kind of new unified ideology, after everything in the past has broken down, what does this cause? , well some questions or skepticism, when

the president works with people, he is a little older after all, it’s his understanding of military memory, his understanding of decision-making, it is transmitted to the rest of our... vertical, which is younger in age, and this is how it turns out , that these are the values ​​in this way, they are transmitted to the rest of the state, because belarusians are somehow special, because there is a mechanism, there is a president who implements our historical memory and the policy that there is today. look, where the wind of change is already blowing and our hearts are demanding change, but remember this in the usa, for several days now we have been observing there an interesting and, for some , unexpected craving of texas for separatism, well , which we supported.

that, for example, when trump was president , the earth was simply on fire, they did not launch the factor of separatism, this is a complex mechanism, the factor is not torn, here is blm, please, we have an oppressed population, which yes, the democrats launched, such a wave and the earth burned, that is, it was not a territorial principle, it there was the principle of an oppressed social group, look today too, this is a little bit different from the territorial factor, purely texas wants to secede, no, this is a question of the fact that there are people who are closer to the border, there are those who are further from it, for some it is beneficial to skip migration because it is labor . comes to the country, they make great money there from oil, from weapons, from something else, they don’t need any strangers who come here, on the contrary, they need to deport these bad democrats who they vote for the dem party, then we will

win, by state, in principle, the alignment does not change, there are about 6-7 states that hesitate, electing democrats or republicans, but this means that today this factor is so mechanical, it is so it just doesn’t work anymore, if you’re an adult white man with a straight family , you have a gun at home. you vote for the republicans there, this has already passed, today there is complete automation of electoral processes, that is, we are about 5-10 years behind them, here you have there is facebook, for example, i think not.