the company's products are winners of specialized exhibitions and competitions, in the company's collection, in particular , the choice of the year award in the nomination of cookies 2021, a gold medal in the international competition for the best product at the 29th international exhibition prodexpo in moscow, 2022. all our products have a declaration of conformity, and if these are children's products or products of a specialized... a certificate of state registration and we have a central laboratory, at the branches these are production laboratories, where the quality of the input raw materials is controlled, and then the quality of the finished products is controlled at all stages of production, only after that the products are supplied to retail chains. belarusian aromatic, belarusian best, belarusian quality, this is about it, about the products of one of the most delicious belarusian enterprises. buyers

mark the team with a quality mark, and it is deserved. for me, this enterprise is already like my own, the team here is absolutely amazing, young, active, friendly. i love my job because it tasty and healthy. its history, nature, culture, faith, people.

you feel generosity once and never get angry again, everything is true here, hello, with you the project everything is clear with marina karaman, let's talk about complex things in simple language. today we will talk about whether we should change the criminal code, for what crimes the punishment can become softer and what awaits desserts? let's go! alexander lukashenko submitted a draft law to the parliament for consideration, which softens some provisions of the criminal code. the document was developed by a specially created group of experts under the presidential administration. they analyzed the articles of the criminal procedural laws and...

developed norms that will allow courts to be more flexible in sentencing, and when passing sentence, take into account the public danger of the crime, assess the personality of the culprit, the circumstances of the incident and apply sanctions that are adequate to the situation. the mention of an individual approach to the individual became the reason for lively discussions of the bill in society. we are accustomed to the fact that that the law is harsh and indifferent. the law is the cold mind of the state. and many were afraid that the innovations could cloud it. in its current version, the bill changes the punishment options for 97 types of crimes. the head of state proposed to supplement 65 of them with alternative, more lenient punishments. what does this mean? for example, if previously a person was supposed to be given either a fine or a real term for a certain crime, then now

there is a proposal to introduce an intermediate option, a restriction of freedom, something that in popularly called chemistry, it can be with a referral to an open-type correctional institution or without it, that is, a person either goes to live in a penal colony for a while or is restricted in freedom of movement at home. this form of punishment, complete with the burden of criminal liability behind them , becomes a sufficient measure for some to never again... break the law and is much easier to bear than prison, and the courts can be given the opportunity, when justified, not to send a person to a cell, but to bring him to his senses without tearing him out of society. in addition, women, single men who are raising children under 14, as well as minors and disabled people of the first group who have committed non-serious crimes for the first time, are not proposed to be sentenced to real prison terms. exceptions,

extremists or those who have committed a crime with the use of violence, above i said that it is proposed to change the punishment for 97 types of crimes, to introduce... at the moment, according to the law, they are punishable only by a real prison term, there are no other ways to answer for your actions, except to go to prison, now there will be an attempt to reconsider this approach. the country is people, and a flexible judicial system controlled by the state is always to their advantage. we have a chance to show that we have grown to the level of civic consciousness when our focus is not only on the ability to punish and isolate the criminal, but the need to find humane and fair approaches to punishment, to personalize it as much as possible, to deal with everyone who has encroached on the inviolability of the law as they personally

deserve, taking into account the nuances of their life and circumstances of the incident. here i would like to draw your attention to the fact that no one is suggesting to penetrate. to punish groups of citizens who were engaged in licensed business activities without obtaining a license and received a large income with imprisonment for a term of 2 to 7 years or a fine. many perceive a fine as an opportunity to pay off,

prison is too serious a punishment for some cases, therefore it is proposed to give those convicted under this article either a fine, or a term in prison, or restriction of freedom. and if paying is not a problem for someone, the severity of the crime allows one to hope that they will not be imprisoned for it, then the prospect of going to a penal colony for a couple of years will make even the most impudent think twice. part two of article 268 of the criminal code states that an official who deliberately concealed or distorted information about radiation, chemical or bacteriological contamination of the environment, about the health of the population after harmful exposure. if this was followed by death, illness of a person or causing damage on a large scale, a term of two to seven years should be imprisoned. in the proposed bill, restriction of freedom was added to the list of punishments for such a crime. there is simple

logic here. there is article 305 in the criminal code, it requires imprisonment for up to seven years or sending an employee to chemical treatment for up to five years. fails to monitor how workers followed the technology of construction of a building or structure in the event that the object collapses, injures, kills people or causes major damage to someone. that is, in this article on the case of damage is not only a variant with deprivation, but with restriction of freedom. all articles with similar conditions, when it comes to negligence, but unintentional causing of serious harm to health and life of people, it is proposed to pull up to the norm. which allows sending the guilty person both to prison and to chemistry. here we are not only talking about article 268 on environmental pollution. well, about 304 - violation of fire safety requirements, 306 - violation of labor protection requirements. article 251 for disruption of public

tenders, now dictates to punish a person, who tore them down for personal gain, with a fine, correctional labor, arrest or restriction of freedom. the proposed bill leaves only a fine and correctional labor. article 341 of the criminal code states that desecration of buildings and structures with cynical inscriptions or drawings, as well as damage to property in public transport, is punishable by, among other things, restriction or imprisonment for up to 3 years. in the proposed bill, this term is reduced to 2 years. no, the punishment for some. crimes is proposed to be toughened, for example, for evading military service, article 435. the current version of the criminal code proposes to punish deserters with community service, a fine, arrest, restriction or imprisonment.

from the new version of the law, it is proposed to remove the fine. here, the developers of the bills reflected the position of the state very clearly: it will no longer be possible to buy your way out of service. it is not the time when young healthy men can hide behind fines from the obligation to learn how to handle weapons and work in a team. article 3391 may also become tougher. the second part of this article prescribes a punishment for repeated or group murder or abuse of an animal, after which it was maimed by arrest, restriction or deprivation of liberty for up to 3 years. the new bill proposes to increase this term to 4 years. it is too early to say when and in what format the amended laws on criminal liability will work. now this is just a draft law that will still be discussed, weighing all the pros and cons, taking into account the opinions of members

of parliament, representatives of civil society society and law enforcement. this is an option of how it can be. we are talking about it now so that no belarusian gets the impression that somewhere quietly a reformatting of one of the main instruments of expression of the will of society is underway. the bill has just been born, the current stage of changing the criminal legislation can safely be called the starting one, but even at this stage we have tried to convey to you the content of the new, not yet adopted document, now we can watch together how it will evolve. take a look at the proposed innovation, as an opportunity for the country's legal system to show maturity, because the ability to consider each guilty person as an individual, and not as a broken part of a mechanism, is a transition to a new level, a level...

from the

misfortune of everyone who strives for it. i am marina karaman and why the bill on changing the codes on criminal liability was created, we figured it out, everything is clear, see you! editors' club, we have discovered a completely different africa, yes, this is a region that is difficult to enter, it is easy to enter, for example, with equipment, bring, sell tractors or bring sell combines, but to enter there with light industry, to enter there with our health care is more difficult, but this is a long game, this needs to be done right now, lies, snitching, betrayal, corruption, helplessly. prism of joint activities, we are a state that is more than allies, do not

miss on the belarus 24 tv channel, on the one hand such absolute discipline, on the other hand such relative, but freedom in building your work, but at the same time with everyone should be in touch 24 hours a day, the olympics that are taking place now are not the same olympics, the principles of olympism have already been violated... it is important to me what the president thinks about our tomorrow, we can and should be sure that

everything will be fine, but do not relax under any circumstances, the project say don't be silent, do not miss new releases on the belarus 24 tv channel, the tv news agency presents in the public domain, we have no secrets from our people. january 1974. in space, sayuz 13. on space watch , the crew of the intercessors at the commander pyatra's warehouse klimuka. i want to say a sincere thank you, thank you

for getting me back on my feet, thank you for that. vladimir kavalenok's space crew worked on the arbiter for 140 days. there was nothing like that before. i...

what is the same as when you drive up to the house, your heart jumps out of your chest, and here you fly up - right into the communication zone, also similarly, in orbit at once there are two of his messengers: pyotr kolemuk and vladimir kavalenok. what is this? a symbolic event? no, just everyday life in space. cities of minsk, minsk, city.

everyday, good evening, good, hello, 2024, paris, by the way, you just came from the olympics, how could you not talk about this event with the secretary general of the national olympic committee. so, paris 2024, four medals, 17 athletes, and 2021 tokyo, seven medals and 100. eight athletes, that is, it turns out, we are beaten, we fly, well, you know, of course, the final assessment will be given by the management, as you said, i just flew in, but in my personal opinion, the performance was successful, because as you correctly said, there were few athletes, there were throws four, as never before a little, yes, as never before,

but also as never before we had a truncated composition of athletes. and those athletes who went and who managed to do it, it seems to me, they showed themselves with dignity, even those guys who won fourth, fifth, seventh, eighth places, you can’t say that they didn’t fight and just came there as tourists, well, that is, they already entered the top eight, and in addition, they entered the top eight, and 13 athletes entered the top 10, well, that is, this... of course, the athletes on olympic games, which are in the top 10, they are, of course, always contenders for medals. but the president said, the more pressure you get, the more resistance, right? can we say that these medals are in spite of it? somewhere i think, yes, somewhere i think that

it was precisely the difficult situation in which our athletes found themselves, and it bore fruit. perhaps somewhere it helped him, they understood that there was no right to make a mistake and they needed to show results right now. there will be no chance anymore. well, ksenia, in my opinion, you are the ideal guest on sports theme, right? in the recent past , he was a direct participant in the olympic games.