january life, to meet and grow up, after a glass to forget, then repent, a glass for the pasta, for frost and a beetle, and after it a glass, a glass of adlamev, a glass for the pasta, for frost, and after it there is a glass, a glass of adlaulu,

hello, on the air of belarus 1 of our satellite tv channel belarus 24, the program club of editors, as always on friday evenings, with a repeat on sunday early morning, we will discuss the most relevant, most interesting topics of the outgoing week, let me, according to good tradition, introduce our guests today, dmitry sanzhuk. main

editor of the publishing house belarus segodnya and member of the council of the republic, olga shpilevskaya, director of the representative office of mtrk mir in belarus, chairman of the belarusian union of women, vladim frantsevich gingin, general director of the national library, head of the knowledge society, member of parliament, andrei krivasheev, general director of the minsk news agency, head of the belarusian union of journalists, member of the minsk city council and aleksei belyaev, dean of the faculty of journalism of bsu, candidate of historical sciences, good evening, thank you.

details, as much as possible, because i know how the president's meeting is held, everything is discussed in great detail, but not everything gets into the press, they really discussed it in detail, as you said, in detail, and the construction, they show a picture of the mayor of the city speaking, the building of the national historical museum, the technologies that will be used, this should be a building in terms of architecture that will complement, in fact, form, as the president said, a quarter of belarusian statehood, independence, the building of the supreme court, and the national historical museum fits in here, here you see the architectural concept that was reported, a large square, which should also become a ceremonial square, a roof in the form of a map of belarus, look, not only the roof, the whole building in the form of a map of belarus, you can see it clearly in the panorama, and the columns, then the columns symbolize, which support the wings of aist, these are the seven regions of belarus, six regions and the city of minsk. then

in the park, which will frame the building, too there will be a corner for each of the regions, and the region will be given the right to form in a single concept what will be presented there, this will be a very bright architectural solution in itself for this building, six bas-reliefs are six periods of the history of belarus, where our heroes will be displayed, those people who were formed throughout the centuries-old history of belarus,

are sick with this work, give their soul to this project, but they also discussed the historical concept, this is very important, yes, the minister of culture anatoly micheslavovich reported markevich, we did.

to create a plan has already been approved in fact, i will undertake to assert this, the best historical museum of such a plan will be, at least, modestly speaking, the president called us to such modesty, without unnecessary ambitions, but nevertheless, better in the post-soviet space, as far as i understood from the first messages, it will not be a museum

of only belarusian achievements, it will be a museum of real history, yes, objectively everything, absolutely objectively, starting with archaeological finds and up to the modern period, i even want to tell you, here fellow journalists, based on your experience, our common experience, we can create a museum of the modern period, why? here are all our actions that took place before and after, people ask that we show the next generation what belarus alexander grigoryevich took over and what it has become now, or the soviet period, sometimes, you know, in the post-soviet space, and further on they only imagine repressions, barbed wire, everything, here we have...

a large historical period, so that , for example, to bring a foreigner, to show him the entire large-scale history of belarus, we simply did not have such a museum, the exhibition that is now in the national historical museum, but it was created some time ago , essentially in the soviet era, as a kind of regional, regional, that is, it does not reflect the national scale, of course, this was a ripe question, which is already overripe even about the fact that we need a new building, and a new exhibition is needed.

of course, you would like it to be the most important thing, so i thought that it would happen so, i walked around all the halls of our museum, i

studied the course, as far as possible, yes, a systematic course on the history of belarus, can i continue with you, i want to draw attention to the time, yes, when we make the decision to create such a museum, the time has just come, there is a demand, people really have a demand for a big one to appear, a really good one... you study it at school, you leave it at school, you leave the walls of school, and this is a place where any mother can return her child,

where any mother can bring her child and without having deep historical knowledge, to show and tell about where the roots of this baby are, yes, how the history of the state in which he lives developed, and this is deep education, a sense of patriotism and love for the homeland, it is laid by such museums, remember how much indignation there was about the construction of the great patriotic war museum? and there were such skeptics who doubted whether it was needed or not, whether it was necessary to invest so much money, whether it was necessary to remember and look today, and look today, what is the passability of this museum, what is the demand for this museum, what museum do foreigners go to when they come to our country, this is the first museum, at least, here are the guests from the cis countries who come to us, they ask to be taken, so it seems to me that what is happening today, that today there was a meeting, that the museum will be founded, this is...

in fact, the demand is huge, the discussion that is now at the table and the desire to speak out, testifies to this, but you know, for me there are several points, which for me... brest region, or, excuse me, then we exhibited some

periods in the history of our land in the historical museum, there the grand duchy of lithuania, the early middle ages, there. as part of the russian empire, yes, or speeches on and expositions were formed according to this principle, but absolutely did not tell about the history of belarusians. this museum is needed for that, i agree with you olga aleksandrovna, so that a mother could bring either a teacher to the child, he would form the main idea about the history of his homeland and this is a museum of the future, that's true, absolutely, and one more. a very important point, is that our historians, thank god, have come to an agreement, absolutely, that's right, vadim frantsevich said that they were removed, we discussed all the questions before the program, that finally our learned men, very smart people, came to the realization

that this is a matter of national importance, and not a personal point of view on history, that's...

actions, they say: listen, well, even the americans, a young, dynamic nation, well, they wrote their own people's history of the united states, that is, history from the point of view of an american dockworker, an american entrepreneur, a migrant from germany or from ireland, and where is our national history, we have princes, wars, devastation, but we want to understand how people lived on this land, what they felt, the second, yes, the second request. this museum, in my opinion, should also become a vaccine against, if you like, historical nihilism and collaborationism. nihilism is characteristic of a certain simplicity of our youth, when they believe that history begins from the moment when they registered on tiktok and read something about history, that's

where history started, and before me at least with a stream, and historical collaborationism is when we, belarusians. and our history are perceived exclusively as a part, and such a subordinate part, second-class polish history, lithuanian history, russian history, ukrainian history, we need, in my opinion, our own history, moreover, we have it, we have something to tell, and can we also give a small insight, ordinary journalists like to ask politicians, famous people, what book are you reading now, i can tell you what book is the president of the republic of belarus reading now, history. sides another assumption, a multi-volume famous book dedicated to the history of russia, but in a broad sense vasily osipovich klyuchevsky, as the president said, this is the accountant, and he shared, here are the assessments of vasily osipovich, the famous professor of history, one of the founders, from the classics of historical science, here it is visible how deeply the president is immersed in

these historical questions, yeah, and why did we try to make it on...

somehow i took a break and well, at work, you look at these extremist resources, i took a break, i suddenly caught myself thinking that when i returned to work, i don’t want to read this

extremist anymore, i can in advance, here we exchanged with our colleague grigory mazarenko, i even posted it on my telegram channel, the same headlines, they’ll write it now, i can even suggest a headline to them, there lukashenko is tearing apart the rada on historia, they’re all the same and also, the same headlines, the same agenda, i can for... regarding their status, although in this case, and i mean about the pardoning of another thirty people, these people went through the commission, we carefully studied the biography

of each, in general, the president signed this decree, they were pardoned, that is, the head of state, the ministry of internal affairs generally proposed, yes , the structures that deal with this issue, the head of state, we analyzed, the head of state supported, what do you think, in a parallel reality, who made the decision. all this is from another stream of some absolute nonsense, can you imagine, and there is no push, that the rejection began, that alexander, he

said about this, that if someone even called like that, then by his nature he would have done everything the opposite, listen, then they got to the point that they began to say that this is the prime minister of the state council letyan, when he flew to us, he raised this topic, this topic is just the president said, well, we already knew this, yes, but alexander grigorievich confirmed it. there is no topic of either the polish border, any of these political znavolnykh, as they write in our relations with china, it is simply not present in principle, and this is not the result of any pressure, as soon as pressure is put on alexander lukashenko on some issue, he, due to his character, a peasant, due to his life experience , will stubbornly do everything the opposite, this is the result, let's be honest, including internal discussion. the decision is made on the basis

of the achieved consensus, when someone can speak out against, someone for, then this point view is reported to the head of state, and he , on the basis of this, from his understanding of the situation, from the fact that the person has repented, wrote a corresponding document, from the fact that the person, well, by his behavior recently, then behaves further, which is very important from the behavior of those who...

or are some populist steps being taken? no, i will even say more, many in society do not understand why these people should be pardoned at all, because on the eve of election campaigns, why are these comrades, patriots speaking out, then why are these comrades, where? well, this is a human and paternal attitude towards one's people, i'm definitely not afraid to say this, because those people who are being released today, yes, there were different moments then, there were those who were drugged, lured, i don't know, who succumbed to feelings,

you see, they heard us, what really happens in reality, here behind these words, any fugitive is capable of any miracles of dexterity in order to justify the stolen money and attribute all the merits to others, went. alexander grigorievich, he sold out, under pressure, well, let's remember one simple axiom, sitting at this table, people know her, that it is useless to put pressure on lukashenko, he will not bargain with anyone, never, always decisions are made by him personally in the interests of the people, and not some kind of immediate benefit or situation, this is the meaning of this

act of humanism, which... alexander grigorievich, this is the most important word, this is a protest direction, yes, this is a protest word, it is chewed over, yes, they are opponents of the government, and to say that they have ceased to be. and a very important point, no matter what people say, no matter how the commission suggested or, on the contrary, said that this person should not be released, yes, the final decision is still up to the president, and accordingly, responsibility too, and he takes this responsibility. an important moment for our comrades, who, or rather enemies , fled there. remember, not a single person who committed a violent act against representatives of the authorities has yet been released. this must be clearly understood. yeah,

it's just that 30 years have passed, excuse me, please, let them show me at least one western politics, even the one who has already left, moved away from politics, is now retired and has a free hand and tongue, he can tell any story, let him tell it. unfortunate people, many of whom were deceived , were not actually extremists, but fell for these crazy round dances that were organized, including in minsk in 2020, got caught, really got caught, having committed serious crimes,

offenses, but they became these new dead souls who are traded on this market, so this is part of the business, secondly - this is the status, here are those who fled belarus for them... but at the same time these fugitive media-like structures, their experts, who are bad experts, who come to court, every time end up in a cauldron, they say before lunch that not a single person communicates with the belarusian government, the collective west, there is no

contact, we are a person of the iongrat, and after lunch they declare that someone called or wrote or came, pressed and the president made a certain decision. they launched a discussion about the right one in which they found themselves, it is getting worse, they to act, to act incorrectly, so it will be liberated or in another way, that is , it is necessary to understand, these acts occur without any participation of theirs, but their consequences influence

the future, demoralization, disappointment in their leaders who imposed them, they came up with them, those methods of action that they use, fourthly, well, let's be honest, we somehow didn't talk about this very much, there arises... to return, maybe it is worth moving away from this extremist movement, and we see what anxiety this causes in their leaders, this well, they are thus losing their flock, they are losing this food base, due to which

an interesting observation, look, 4 years have passed, and even today we absolutely do not see any success stories in any of the social networks, neither in tiktok, nor on youtube, nor on facebook, nowhere, yes, yes.

you understand, colleagues, a small remark, this is how cynicism of our pseudo-oppositions is fugitive, that is, regarding political prisoners, they adhere to the version that this is a resource that needs to be traded, that is , they say: it would be profitable for us to agree, to use them as some kind of pressure on the regime, to propose that the eu pursue a policy in accordance with the fact that they would be on these political prisoners of some kind.

and what has not happened, bukhim, the judge, well , he broke the law, britain showed how to deal with such people, and we may still talk about this, what terms they get in the targeted west, but as for these analysts and media-like structures with low social responsibility, which are now working in poland, in lithuania, nothing a spy was detained japanese, but this is a nickname, in general, a very japanese surname.

and these are not landmarks, but roads,

bridges, other logistics communications, military facilities, which he was afraid to transmit over the internet, but wanted exclusively in person. do you understand that this is a crime? yes, do you agree with this? yes, did you commit this? yes, i understand, these are crimes, the first stage of the operation was completed successfully. the japanese man entered into a fictitious marriage with a citizen of belarus, opened a commercial structure, the activities of which meant his frequent trips to the border.

i always thought that this is a samurai, an independent, self-sufficient nation, very interesting, disciplined, what the americans have been doing to them in recent decades, starting with the nuclear bombing, yes, of course, the japanese, so to speak, did some crazy things in their time, you as historians can tell us more about this, but this does not mean that we need

to lie under them for 80 years after that, just in the worst sense of the word, but the same policy continues. japan is a satellite in the worst sense for the united states of america. japan is an occupied state. and this is reflected in the legislative framework of japan. there are american military

facilities on japanese territory. many areas of japan, including okinawa , until recently were not actually subordinate to the central government. were governed directly by the american military administration. japan, in the full sense of the word, is not a sovereign state that pursues an independent policy. it completely controls the united the states. this rapid change of prime ministers that is happening in japan, it reflects that the prime minister de facto does not really govern the japanese state. against this background, there is a wild militarization of japan under the control of the united states. the second world war, when recently on september 2 we celebrated the end of the capitulation of japan. japan was supposed to become a demilitarized state, instead , i will say again, under the control of the united states,

a powerful group is already being created there. japan cannot have aircraft carriers, there will be ismin helicopter carriers, in fact, too. japan has a highly trained officer caste, in fact , japan has deployed divisions, japan is considered by the united states as one of the key elements of pressure on china on russia in the context of a military threat, that's what japan is now, simply put, japan decided to shake up the situation in our region together with the americans and europeans, what was he doing on the belarusian-ukrainian border this man, listen, i still look at the march in the twentieth year, he was sketched, a handsome man with such appearance to go into such a crowd, of course, you will never fall into the field of view of the cheka, this man, there is one psychological detail, the fact is that after the disaster at the chernobyl ues, namely in the gomel region, namely in the affected regions, many

japanese came and helped, who had experience in fighting radiation as a result of the bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki. in principle, in that region the attitude towards the japanese was very, very good and even with some gratitude, and this moment is also the special services, i think, used, thought through, and the fact that japan is essentially a militaristic state, yes, we know that, look at the atrocities that japanese troops committed on chinese territory during world war ii,

your report, let our chinese friends and partners watch it, and let everyone else from latin america to australia see what dirty methods they use against our vital platform, where we don’t wish anything bad on anyone, well, respect to the special services that did all this, of course they are working on us, these former partners of ours and they will work, but it's okay, we'll hold out, we'll move on to another topic, collectively, again, what other, collectively? the west or generally to the west to the united states of america to western europe? i 've prepared some small thoughts for sleep here, let's discuss them,

i'll show you a few fragments of an interview, lately i've been getting a lot of pleasure from what i've been observing in the countries of the collective west, for many years the president and we here in the editors' club have been talking about freedom of opinion and democracy in the west is a fiction, we have talked about this a lot, my opinion has always been this...

the famous soviet émigré, political scientist dmitry simes. quote: together with his wife , the us brought an official charge against suspected of violating sanctions due to work on channel one. the scientist's wife is also accused of illegally purchasing art objects for a russian oligarch. attention, sainz faces up to 60 years in prison, and his wife up to 120 years. the most interesting thing is that sams

was once an employee of radio liberty. in the center strategic international studies, directed the center for russian and eurasian programs at the carennegie foundation, was a professor at johns hopkins university, columbia university and the university of california at berkeley. in 1978, he was director of research at the sir center for the study of strategic international affairs at georgetown university. attention, was an unofficial adviser on foreign policy to former us president richard nixon. his father.

situations, many people say: it is better to not to talk because it is too dangerous, too dangerous in europe, to tell the truth in europe, it is in europe, it was previously impossible to imagine such a thing, that people are silent out of fear, but now, unfortunately, it is really so, and it is happening everywhere now, people are simply afraid to openly discuss, to openly cite some facts. i believe that this is necessary, because it is capable of preventing a nuclear war, well , this is not belarus, i draw attention, but about western countries, well, the last thing for dessert, as always many years ago, prophetic words from alexander lukashenko about democracy, human rights in the west, it was several years ago during communication with us, let's listen, they are not what we thought about them, listen, both you and i, we thought that there was

democracy, english law and courts, that's all. there is no law there, whoever gets paid, and they will decide, this is a law for the time being, they will arrest your assets, like in russia and forget what law and private property are, he himself said yesterday that most likely he could lose his property and well, the house, of course the house, but some family values, paintings, icons of parents, he said that most likely he could lose them, well and what do you think, well, i 'll give you an example regarding belarus, here pa started to act like this even much earlier, okay? i remember the discussion after the elections, the discussion in quotes of 2010 in the council of europe in 2011 we sincerely came to show our position and so on , so well, yes, we went with a group of belarusian deputies then the decision had already been made to introduce sanctions, here dmitrisanovich remember we worked together then, we opened it for me, the decision had not yet been made

, he says, well, we will go to you, but everything has already been decided, imagine, they had not made any decisions yet... these supposed european parliamentarians had made them, everything had already been decided, so, they voted as expected, a french professor of sociology comes up to me and says: "guys, well done"? you are your president there, so we look at how this new trend in europe is, i say, and how did you vote, mister professor, he says, well, i voted against you, i say, and why? he says, well, that's how it's done here, understand, he left, they were all sitting there on grants, this year passed, i'm talking to one of the european politicians, he says the question is that no one comes to us, we don't communicate with anyone, one of the european politicians, he says, listen, he says, well, you know, well, he's holding... your president, he says this, well , we can't say anything else, factor l, factor l. i say, what is factor l? lukashenko, if i say somewhere that lukashenko is doing the right thing there, they'll cut everything off for me,

it's like our father for them, excuse me for such sanctity, yes, that is, this is the rule of life, what jeffrey sachs talks about, and these repressions, they will affect anyone, absolutely any person, regardless.

we talked about it, but there is simply no need to prove anything more, the suppression of dissent in the united states, western europe has a cool, long-standing technology, that's why it happened so quickly, and people working in the public space understand and know these rules perfectly well, either you are in the mainstream, or you dissolve in history, well, if not in sulfuric acid, yeah, there were such cases.

the state, the united states and gil and other terrorists finance around the world, they finance, so they are a terrorist state, have you ever heard this statement in the press about the united states, and you will never hear it, because whoever says it will be doomed, there are people, yes, who understand that the states are losing this hegemonic function today, they are trying to jump into some window, maybe a small window, i don’t know, so far it hasn't worked out, they are still being reached by powerful special services, a powerful state, but these

are precisely the markers that the process has begun, we have not heard of such situations before , vadim fransovich, though, the only thing i don't understand is why american expert colleagues are surprised, they know better than others both the era of makortism and the era of... repressions against their own with an alternative ideology, did anyone really believe that this system, this deep american state, these six or seven names that hold the american common fund, excuse me, they could have changed their methods, here i would still like to say bravo to margarita simonovna simonyan and to the russian mia today, because they react coolly, they react with irony, they say: well, yes, it so happened that we... telling the truth, we break through any information barriers, and yes, we are popular in latin america, and yes, we are listened to even in the united states and the european union, here the only thing that cannot cause a smile is that

medich is absolutely right, the more they become ridiculous in their rhetoric, now they say: democracy, freedom of speech, the whole world is laughing at them, they will become even more aggressive, because they can no longer prove their truth with the help of propaganda. force. that means they will prove it with their fists. by the way, returning to china, a girl from the czech republic stands up on a big forum, it would seem, from the czech republic, a journalist, she has a huge experience, she probably wrote. and unflattering things about us, about the russian federation, and they say them practically with tears, with tears in his eyes he says: democracy has ended in the czech republic, i am czech, i cannot take a step to the right, a step to the left from the mainstream in my country, i am immediately fired, i am immediately expelled from here, and i become, what's more, they are starting to persecute me as an enemy of the people, he says, what is this, we used to think that this was only possible in the evil empire in the soviet union, right?

i will do everything, everyone else must obey me, well, yes, yes, it was always like that with democracy, it just may not have always been so loud, yes, but any person, which is an ordinary worker who came to work, knew that he had to follow and say only what he was told in his company, otherwise, if he turned left or right, he would immediately lose his job, yes, these are such small examples, it's just that now they have turned into something big, well, and we need to understand why they are acting so harshly now, why they are shutting the mouths of people there, opinion leaders, who? are trying

to say something else, we must not forget that all these countries are inside themselves, in such a state, a brewing civil war within these countries, there are internal conflicts, and there it is no longer possible to allow someone to appear with a different point of view and rock the people in order to accelerate this civil war, here it is not even so much because they are external, although this is certainly and rashi today prohibits everything else, because it is not possible for these people to go out to the external circuit and tell?

bloody regimes, if this also protects should the anonymity of opponents be protected the worst of criminals, protecting durov for the sake

of protecting the anonymity of his users makes no sense, of course, why democracy, democracy is not limited to freedom, freedom of expression, it is also for...

i have two questions, please tell me, what did we do wrong then, yes, when we presented, questions, asked questions, presented demands for 2020, in particular and for other, later years, but if it is horrific, but if it turned out that we were right, then why were sanctions imposed on us for these reasons and the last name or support of alexander grigoryevich lukashenko? is banned in western countries, in general, it seems to me that it is difficult to comment on this, everything has turned upside down, i believe it is impossible, that it is enough for us to simply convey these points of view to our viewers and readers, they themselves see and understand everything perfectly, i

can say that we did it wrong, we did not convey this hypocrisy of theirs, this lie of theirs to our people enough, the first and main audience is our audience inside belarus, and as for double standards? well, there is nothing surprising here either, remember binladin himself, while he was fighting the soviet union in afghanistan, he was a rebel, as soon as he started fighting against the united states, he became who, a terrorist, everything is correct, i don’t know, but in general, all the signs are who is behind that, here is what is being done to us after the twentieth year, here is the guardian published an article elon musk is out of control, that they propose to openly boycott tesla, not to buy their cars.

in the usa. let's wish success. and trump and musk. carthage must be destroyed. in a few days more details about participation in crimes in ukraine have come to light. why are they so afraid of members of the us democratic party, in particular mr. biden. you know, there was such a us president. documents have leaked online from court proceedings, indicating that the us participated in organizing a coup d'etat in ukraine and corruption scandals. quote. the russian court found out that biden and victoria brought turchynov and yatsenyuk to power in ukraine in order to realize

us interests, including the physical elimination of dissenters, yanukovych barely had time escape, thousands of people were killed. biden also threatened to stop providing kiev with a billion-dollar subsidy for refusing to fire the country's prosecutor general, viktor shokin, who was unpopular with the united states. we saw that biden himself talked about it on air. nuland blackmailed ukrainian politicians, their foreign.

place and bring down not only their capital, but the entire country into a civil or any other war or military conflict, well, what is democracy, elections in germany, you know, yes, of course, and what happened there in the course, yes, by regarding the vote count, they recounted it so you understand, yes, the alternative for germany should have had 41 seats as a result of the vote count, they could block any decision in the state parliament.

at the same time, the party, which was immediately stated that it would not participate in the formation of governments, that is, they represent the majority in relation to all other political forces, but they stubbornly do not want to allow them to power, now they are not hiding anything, you simply do not hide anything, the recount of votes is a direct criterion and a sign to say that there was a maidan, a color revolution and so on, interference, nothing, everything is fine. finally, sanctions were imposed on our company, we recently received, well, how recently, no, well, yes, that's when again

, it was probably 2024, or something, the beginning or another anniversary, they each time, the european commission confirms, this time already in the twentieth year they do not remember, we support the invasion, we personally went there with weapons, apparently, we crossed the border with ukraine, but one of the main accusations in in relation to us, one of the main points is that we associate the ukrainian government with nazism, unfairly. what, what can you say? bbc, if you can be very brief, i remember when the azovites surrendered,

they stood on azov, they, therefore, posted it was broadcast and two commentators of the russian-language bbc say: the russians, despite all efforts, cannot find signs of nazi symbols on the bodies and clothes of the prisoners, at that time, these frames showed nazi symbols in the form of tattoos, stripes and so on, right on the air, they comment, the picture is different, that to do with these people, well, especially here there was a shot, especially pleased when italian journalists are given interviews, comrade, not comrade, who is in kursk region, he has a leibshtan on his cap.

we showed, we show, and you know that trust in state media is growing, the television audience is growing, the most fugitive media-like structures that work in poland and warsaw tell about this pitifully. chatmanhouse, here is the last question of public opinion, well, such an office, but they are still polling belarus, found out that 42% of belarus support rapprochement with russia,

13% support joining the eu. this, it seems to me, is a remarkable result. we will tell you about the progressive experience of various organizations in our country. once upon a time, this workshop was half empty compared to the fact that now there are 50 names of new products, this is more than ever, and in different areas we started, released. our enterprise is the only one in belarus that produces velvet-like fabric. we

purchased a whole line for this, starting from knitting, finishing and...

i hope for a bonus, if everything works out, then at the end of the month we'll go with... your dream, and we 're definitely transporting a banana, exactly, everything is in order, the goods are in place, i told you, uh, and what 's actually going on here, and it feels like we're not transporting bananas, your job is not to think, to follow the instructions of the management. denis, either we cooperate, or you 'll be celebrating the next, i think, 10 birthdays of your wife in prison, choose, you conducted your investigation too noisily, now you have to die. three, four, five, six, i beg you, please show me the body, i u, i u really beg you, i need to look at it, listen, it's impossible, your hands, they are so similar to my husband's hands, it can't be, arina, forgive me, but your husband died 2 years ago,

watch the series native hands on the belarus 24 tv channel. every day we work to ensure that you receive the latest and most useful information: the twenty-minute format allows us to tell you about what is happening in belarus. find a new place on the map of belarus that is definitely worth seeing, and also offer projects and films that will certainly become your favorites, this and much more awaits you in the project efir 24x7, watch on the belarus24 tv channel.

on air news in the studio lena melnitskaya, good morning here's what we'll tell you about: aryna sabalenka won the us open tennis championship, this is her first us open title, her second victory in the grand slam tournaments this season. americans admire the ukrainians, who are trying to stop the russians so that the us does not have to with them.