the day before , the man's girlfriend left him, a random stranger became the object of an outburst of aggression for unhappy love. after he strangled his victim, the killer wanted to dismember her with a kitchen knife, but only after he started , he realized that it was very difficult to leave the body in the apartment. all these terrible circumstances became known not even during the investigation, but already during the initial check conducted by detectives. the employees solve a considerable number of crimes, and i want to tell you, this is daily. various kinds, various articles, you can even say so, but and we don't want people to pay attention to this, but at the same time we want them to be informed how our employees cope with just the task of this or that type of crime, this is the work of a large team of minsk police and units, even some unknown to citizens, this is daily work, starting from monitoring video surveillance, ending with ...

monitoring this or that information on the internet, this is done daily by employees. drug control, bab service, criminal investigation, the department of counteracting cybercrime, public safety police and many other services, departments of the departments that ensure the security of the capital of belarus, very soon they will have a new modern building. this is the calling card of the entire police, not only grudominsky, but also the country, you could even say so. that's all.

history minsk police have gone from creation and development to the present. 80 years ago they did not have unique monitoring systems, but crimes were solved thanks to operational skills. their experience and professionalism of the capital's police officers has been carried through many years. post-war banditry, the dashing nineties, the difficult noughties. and today these competencies, along with modern technologies, have become the strongest alloy. for solving even the most complex crimes, of course, protecting public order in the capital of our country. the tv news agency presents in the public domain. we have no secrets from our people. many enemies of the gods ate on

the fires of the republic. on shnyava the road is a skinny , what to see with combines horse-drawn carriages also work. every day there is a great load for caliber cars, there is something to take from the field. the workers of the fields need such equipment, which helps to fully ensure the survival of the karma.

today, a number of enterprises of the ussr ministry of automobile industry, these are automobile plants, factories, suppliers of components of electrical equipment, delay the development of these products to us, well, this machine is certainly much more complicated, if we assemble of course conscientiously, the machine is good. polesie 250 goes to the fields, fly.

the agricultural machinery department has established the preventive maintenance and repair, the dispatch service is responsible for the agricultural machinery sector, you look, you look, as if everything is so simple, as if everything was blooming here before, as if there was no swamp at all, it seems that only hands created everything, their sons and grandsons will remember them forever. what meaning do modern painters put into their works? and so that all this is not in vain, so that it helps people to pray,

so that it helps them to repent, to become churchgoers. how is training conducted on sundays today? schools. one lesson is spiritual, the law of god, one lesson. creativity, one lesson in music, and for older children, that is, adults, there are already lectures on subjects, well, there is already, so to speak, more serious preparation. what is mercy? this is probably the food that we ourselves will always need, and this is the food of god, which is born in the heart of a compassionate soul. what unique shrines are kept in belarusian churches? here we have just the holy relics of the martyr. boniface of rome, and vaneface is a patron helper in such a sin, which with which many, many people encounter it, this is the sin of drinking wine, this particle of relics that came to us from greece. answers to

these and other questions in the spiritual and educational projects on the belarus 24 tv channel

. hello, as always, we will discuss several high-profile topics with the guests in the studio, and in the second block, a connection from moscow, russian intelligence officer andrei bezrukov, the hunt for durovo, the kursk adventure in su and much more we will discuss, but let's start with ours, attempts to attack belarus continue again and again, attempts to demonize, so, who loves there to attribute to us.

in the conflict and for military actions to also take place on the territory of the republic of belarus, that is, those who believe that it is too early to end the conflict in ukraine, and that it is possible and necessary to expand its territory in order to inflict very serious, one might say, catastrophic damage, primarily on the russian federation, well, and we, according to such plans, well, just brushwood in this fire, to be honest, we have no...

and we were forced to concentrate our troops on our border, but nevertheless it is obvious that there is no point in anyone belarus has no right to attack. well, how do you like that? an online vote has opened on the portal of the british tabloid daily express on the question: should great britain take action against belarus, since fears of a new war are growing. the interim results of the vote are more than 60% in favor, that is, they believe that something should be done. well, how many people took part in the question is not reported, everything is clear here, after all, this is a tabloid, a yellow press,

and the topic appeared between materials about the benefits of ginger and the best shampoos for everyone hair types, now the question is: who needed such a publication for an inexperienced audience, which, probably, even if you show them a map of belarus, they won’t point it out, needed to slip such a survey about belarus. neighboring, adjacent states, they are seriously considering these options, moreover,

many of them expect that for them this is a chance to earn more, to get more, so to speak, from selling security issues for themselves, therefore, first of all, it is necessary to pump up information, so that the population, well let's say, did not contradict this. andrey, how do you look at the situation, well, according to the british article, they took the statement of the ukrainian ministry of foreign affairs, the last one on belarus, then they... sort of deciphered that there are such bad belarusians, they will attack tomorrow, what to do with them? this suggests that the ukrainian ministry of foreign affairs is somehow connected to the british ministry of foreign affairs of some leftist publication, through what are they connected, well, probably through the british government, that's clear, regarding the president's statement, well, formally this is a response to the same statement of the ukrainian amidah about the fact that we are supposedly going to attack someone there, he says: no, we are not going to, but informally, we are talking about the fact that the leaves on the trees, they are green now, then they will be yellow, they will fall, that's when the sabotage and reconnaissance groups that are sitting in the green zone of the kursk region, they will find themselves without this cover of everything, well, perhaps something will change for us closer to november,

therefore, until that moment there may still be some ukrainian actions, for example, in the bryansk direction, maybe something will happen in the kursk direction, but then the situation will roll back not in favor of ukraine, until that moment they need some kind of provocation, or an asymmetric response, or something else, that's why the president is monitoring the situation very carefully so that this provocation is not somehow connected with the belarusian direction there or with bryansk region, that's what interests us today, well, at least until november, yeah. and what do you think? i also agree with this question a little, because uh, there is probably a provocation in reserve and they are preparing it and only the moment when to turn it on or off, so if they happen, then public opinion, including in great britain, is being prepared for this, that's one, secondly, i would say that recently the british prime minister in all...

the personal position of the minister, and nothing more, in general, olgayevna, a terrible imbalance in

the polish upper echelons, and considering that this is right next door, but there is definitely nothing good in this. poland makes a lot of statements, and we see that the danger lies precisely in the fact that their internal political field has become very unstable, because these various statements, they actually testify to the fact that there is a distribution of responsibility, and today... here is the position of the ministry of defense and the minister of defense, who is tipped, by the way, for the post of president, it seems to me that there is a shifting of responsibility to this person for some specific...

17 cars confiscated from local drivers for driving drunk, there will be many such stories, because now the information space needs to be pumped with some simple stories, people are tired of this constant tension and misunderstanding of what is happening, that is why such small injections are just statements from local russian drivers about driving drunk, it is strange to take away shiba, it is not... this message is plausible that there is no such replica, if we go back to warsaw, and then jump further from latvia, with this imbalance that we are talking about now on the eve of the presidential elections, we see that in terms of the degree of saturation with weapons, in terms of, say, military

component, very many people are reminded of what is happening in poland now in the mid-thirties. poland and germany are in completely different weight classes, the minister of defense, as far as i remember, used the word record.

it often happens in history that if someone prepares a gun, it will fire sooner or later. most likely, poland is being prepared for a more active role in ukraine, primarily in the west. that is, there is an option when the kiev regime will be defeated in a military sense, well, let's say, the next year, and in order not to lose control at least for...

because all these efforts of hers in terms of arming, in terms of digging in, mining, these projects of hers for 2.5 billion.

britain itself was betting on this moment, on today, that, speaking about today's poland, the biggest mistake of the west is that they are trying poland, they are designing poland as a gendarme in western ukraine, this will be the most terrible, probably, mistake in the entire history of the west, why, because the volyn massacre and... again the poles will become poles, that's 100%, as soon as they enter ukraine as saviors, liberators,

gendarmes and so on, the reflex will still kick in, and this will cause a completely opposite reaction, they will never be saviors there, there will be more bloodshed there than there was during volyn, if i add anything, i need to look at the structure of these polish expenses, and there 51% goes to the military equipment park, that is, the tax rate is 20%, they are now at the peak of rearmament, well, our military specialists are also surprised, you have your own polish school of tank building, good, you are buying korean tanks, expensive ones, which will need to be serviced, repaired, and from the point of view of the state this is wrong, that is , they don’t do it this way, these are also some kind of kickbacks, some kind of corruption, at the same time, yes, they have this big budget of 35 billion dollars, but apparently they will then reduce it a little, because after rearmament they will not be able to constantly spend so much and... in principle, of course, if you look at nato countries, where the percentage is higher, where it is lower, they form precisely a large block of expenses near our border, russian, belarusian-ukrainian, there is a belt of countries

that, well, they have to throw out more , so not everyone will pay 4.7, but the closer you are to russia, the higher your percentage of deductions for defense, this is the idea that is being thrown out there today, the factor of our having nuclear weapons in this whole situation, as you see, nuclear weapons are cheap, this is their main advantage, based on the fact that here we can do. we cannot do, so we are just a small country that cannot afford to buy so weapons, well, and nuclear weapons are the weapons of poor countries, that's what saves us in the event of some real escalation there or the creation of an offensive group there, plus there are the issues of kaliningrad, of course for russia, that is , for them it's our belarusian balcony - it's also a question of covering this very western outpost, it won't abandon us, well, in general, the presence of nuclear weapons is of course such a key issue of security, many people are now asking themselves, what would happen to us in general with the world,

what to do with us, try to be tougher, there will be a nuclear response, and this will destroy the entire planet, and they do not want to die more than anyone, because they have a well-fed and good life with those who make these decisions, well, that's how to digress from the topic. the heroes of our program are outstanding individuals captured by their right.

the grain of fascism in europe has never disappeared anywhere on the channel of the editors' club elite in germany

and... in other countries after world war ii there were the same ones who fought with the soviet union. nazism and nationalism are the same a tool like any other, like economic strangulation, sanctions, like an information hybrid war that corrupts society from within. the catastrophic consequences are to divide people along national, religious lines, so they take this into service, support it, finance it, cultivate it and... ultimately this leads to these events, so there is no good nationalism. serious corporations and special services are working against us, which have simply fantastic financing for us, and this apparatus and mechanism must be confronted systematically. don't miss it on the belarus 24 tv channel

. it is gratifying that our top military-political leadership understands the significance of such a very powerful and terrible weapon, yes, that is , it is not just some kind of nonsense, yes, which says that, well, that means we are so powerful here, no, it is a forced... on our part, there was a decision to deploy it, since we understood that the risks of a threat around our borders have increased many times over, that is, it is not from a desire to threaten nuclear a club to our neighbors, this is from a real understanding that an adequate response to these rearmament programs, to an increase in military budgets, to militarization can be asymmetrical, that is, without drawing us into an arms race, without... transferring

the majority of the budget to military needs, therefore this response, well, let's say, is wise from the point of view of public administration, because it allows us to save simply resources that go to social services, but the risk of this conflict, unfortunately, is increasing, why? we see how, for example, now the ukrainian side is behaving in a loose, brazen manner. understanding that they are balancing on the edge, it is clear that russia will not respond with tactical nuclear strikes, but the fact that they are provoking this, this is already a very serious signal, let's really look into this topic in more detail, we see how the armed forces of ukraine are deliberately hitting civilian targets - cars, shopping centers, houses, we see these endless provocations with nuclear power plants, here is a feeling, it is clear that they were given the go-ahead for this, a feeling that... here

the main task now is to force russia to respond as harshly as possible in order to discredit it in the eyes of its big partners, india, china, and at the same time finally untie the hands of the west, to say, well, look at the hammer, bloody moscow, we told you, that is, isn't this what they are leading to now, yes, they are really trying to provoke the russian side into even more, let's say, large-scale responses, catastrophic responses for ukraine, well, but here it is a question of balance, after all, the actions of the ukrainian side are extremely dangerous for the whole region, they certainly demand an answer, i won't take it upon myself to give advice here, but the thing is that for now i have the feeling that in the west they think that the red lines voiced by russia are not serious, that the answers that ukraine is receiving, well, they are quite acceptable for now, and that they need to continue doing what they

are doing, that is, the question is: there will be no speeches there in response to an attempt to step over the next red lines, after all, the kursk nuclear power plant grossi arrived, said that in essence in an ordinary building, in such a technological sense, this active part of the reactor is stored and if a missile hits, there will be a second chernobyl, and maybe even worse, this is already a man-made disaster that concerns not only russia and ukraine, but the whole world, that is , what is the price of the issue then, if they are ready to go even to such a length in this conflict, well

, for some reason they think that they can... that is, they basically allow a nuclear desert, they will act there like in mad max, that is, they absolutely don’t give a damn about ukraine, about europe, about any state, they live in a different consciousness

world, where there is a conditionally post-apocalyptic territory, where they hope to survive and rule it, you just need to understand who we are dealing with in this sense. and how is it in this case? part, really, on the one hand you see these mad maxes who are ready to drive further through this scorched desert. there is kiev, which, as some believe, its main task is to do everything in its power to prolong martial law again and again and thus avoid the need to hold elections. firstly, do you agree with this approach, and secondly, how should one act and respond in such a situation? well, firstly, for some reason everyone wants or expects some kind of response. from russia, why does russia feel calm, because firstly, the problem is not that someone has nuclear weapons, the problem or the meaning is what will happen for this, russia has a very

strong kozryk, which appeared in 1985 of the last century, this is the perimeter, that is, a system that, well, if you say so figuratively, to remind, yes, this is skynet, that is, artificial intelligence, which will respond in in any case, that is, this is a retaliation set on automatic, so russia feels calm in this regard. from the point of view of kiev's behavior, kiev is not just hunting for nuclear power plants there, it is blackmailing, blackmailing not russia, but blackmailing the west, and in this way it is begging for tactical nuclear weapons for itself, first of all. that is, either you give us the opportunity to litter with nuclear pollution, so to speak, or we will ruin the entire landscape here, well, plus everything, this is very much in line with the american, with the renewal

american nuclear doctrine, in terms of the fact that the americans, through their doctrine, are trying to promote precisely international approval of pinpoint nuclear... operations, ukrainian land was sold to large corporations in the united states of america, which bought up land, soil , and, accordingly, contaminated soil - this is a toxic asset, you can't use it, it's quite possible to integrate into this system. olga igorevna? yes, i also completely agree that

kursky, this is the whole situation that is unfolding today, this is a dialogue between ukraine and the west, and not some signals and crossing some red lines with the russian federation, that's why russia is behaving.

it's impossible, the americans in 1945 didn't ask anyone for any permission, then they had even weaker positions, because america asserted its power only after 1945, when everything was over, it had to be done in stages over the course of five to eight years, at least, and do the americans have moral readiness for some small clash with the use of tactical nuclear weapons. yes, of course, of course, after the fact that they have genetic memory

of 1945, today they absolutely do not need any permission. there is also a nuclear fuel market, all our reactors, both russian and ukrainian, they are all soviet, they all work on fuel elements. the task of the west is to either have the russians fall under sanctions, stop selling this fuel, or the stations are damaged, or they discredit themselves there as more dangerous, so if something happens, it will be a blow to... and their task is either to convert these soviet-style stations to american westinghouse fuel, or simply to close them down and then build a large nuclear program there in poland, so all these provocations that are connected there along the iaea line, these constant demonstrations that russia has weak stations, that they are unsafe there or something else, all this ultimately hits the russian nuclear market, let's say , production, a number of countries, including our partners, will think about it today, that's it kazakhstan is going to hold a referendum on the construction. nuclear power plant, that is, this topic will also probably influence

the decision, that is, all this is converted into some profits, in principle, this whole nuclear topic is a topic about how vistingaus is replacing the market share of france or russia, well, i think so. as for tactical decisions with the kursk region, it is interesting that not long ago, deputy director of the us cia david cowen said: "we are confident that putin will undertake a counteroffensive to try to return this territory, it will be a difficult fight for the russians, he said. putin will have to deal with it."

now russian society, in connection with the loss of some territories of the kursk region , will be outraged and accordingly put pressure on the kremlin on moscow and maybe some internal campaign against moscow will be repeated , that's why the cia is simply trying to get out of this mess, i would say aslanovich, and i interrupted you then, i will repeat this question, and we can sort of reflect on this topic, all these provocations of the kursk region. nuclear power plants, the kiev regime

needs this in order to prolong martial law and avoid new elections, do you agree with this point of view? in this - which also has its own meaning, why? because, well, even putin said this openly, all the intelligence services are already calculating this, why? because the longer the martial law is, and it depends on the situation in the conflict, that's it. the longer the term will be, even if it's artificial, that is, on the part of zelensky, that is, he will rule as long as there is martial law, as soon as the situation will change, they will no longer take him into account, is this his desire, what do you think, or are these conditions set before him, it is definitely not a good prospect, to be the leader of such a country and at the cost of the lives of tens and hundreds of thousands of its citizens to remain in power, well, extra months, let's say, the fact is that... this is the bridle that controls zelensky, in

fact, he is kept in this interest, that is, he, he was put in a position of interest in martial law, and he will do everything in order to remain formally even the head of state through martial law, which means the war will continue in any case, what do you think, the goal in this conflict from the west is of course not the protection of ukraine there. it is to put russia on its shoulder blades as much as possible, and without repeating the mistakes of 1991, this is how, that is, apparently, not just to inflict. damage, but to finish off, that is, perhaps the option of division, the option of taking control of nuclear weapons and all resources, that is, not so that russia remains some kind of significant player, that is, i think, part of the elites, possibly associated with trump, i would like to come to an agreement with

the russian federation, well, repeating the trick, say, with some kissinger, who did it with china, that is, to conclude an informal alliance.

they are going to deploy those same american missiles again, the same person who made such a complete turnaround in his career there. the question is, to what extent can we trust these people in their anti-war position, while they do not influence anything, yes, they can beautifully tell something about peace and friendship with everyone, as soon as they are to influence something, these people for some reason change so mysteriously abruptly, like scholz this turnover has already completely passed, scholz will generally go down in history, or rather he will get into trouble, look what the news means, what volkswagen came for the first time in... history is thinking of closing factories in germany, volkswagen ceo oliver blume warned that the european automobile industry is, quote: in a very serious situation. well, the fish rots from the head, so the gills can act out something there, some kind of thrashing, but the head does what they want american comrades, therefore, well , unfortunately, while with the current configuration in

the government there will not be any drastic changes there, especially in terms of security, in terms of this military policy that is connected with the east, well, it is necessary to somehow... influence this, well, i think, russia is working, what we see there in the last elections that took place there on the territory of east germany, the former, well, something is happening there, but to what extent belarus can influence these processes, we can only observe and evaluate that, well, yes, cars have become more expensive there, cars, then, are not produced, there is something else, well, this is only our third-party observation for now, yes, i see that you want to add something, well, yes, that is, we see that germany is generally balancing on the brink of recession, that is, in certain months it even went into the minus. in terms of growth, or rather in terms of gdp indicators, therefore the situation with the economy in the locomotive of europe is very serious, but despite this, if you really control the top, the so -called elite, while this is so, there is a very strong euro-atlantic connection, these

glimmers of some other policy that we are seeing in eastern germany, well yes, this gives some hope that but again, as far as eastern... germany can turn the rest around, because it is not so influential in the economy, that's when certain changes begin in bavaria in terms of elections and the government of this land, that will already be reflected at the federal level, but for this, probably, another 2-3 years of war will be needed. olga igorevna, is it worth counting on europe today in in this sense? well, of course, we all ask ourselves the question, what should europe think, so who will think? yeah. where can we find their people, these people who will think, we all, yes, we know them all by heart , we see perfectly well that they cannot think, because they all live only in the current moment, they have long ago become stale, we use - this is not a very good word, in peaceful conditions, and they simply cannot think in a crisis, not because they are bad, not

because they are good, you can’t do it like that here, they simply cannot restructure their thinking in a crisis mode, that is why volkswagen does such things. calls things by their proper names, just as they are, perhaps, here is our healthy voice regarding the ukrainian conflict, regarding

europe, it is heard today, and the number of people who are in the information space, we do not see them, maybe they are only on some separate statements, but it is already growing, this chain, this circle, it may well begin to form, and separate statements that are made in germany, they have already been. maybe we will see, in any case i count on it, that this chain through different countries, it will go , it will end with us, and we will be included in this circle, because common sense is needed by everyone today, everyone will look for like-minded people, not allies, not partners, without obligations, well, at least in order to solve the current problem, and we have one current problem, it is not to get drawn into the conflict, europe and belarus. well, thanks to our experts, but with the audience bye... i'm not saying goodbye, let's try to see the white threads of the special services, which are now sewing up durov's case to the entire telegram

, connections russian intelligence officer andrei bezrukov, stay with us, we will prove that belarusian cuisine is not only draniki, we will cook something new, something that has never... tried, never seen, the name of this something is very funny, say: bourgeois, mantuls, the most important thing, remember, asyotor is juicy, but not fatty, so this dish can safely be called dietary very healthy. let's learn more about historical past of belarusians. in ancient times , only men had the right to weave sludsky belts, there is a reasonable justification for this: the work was physically very hard and it was necessary to have remarkable endurance for ...

our neighbors, that the red line begins where the border of one state ends and our belarusian begins. ksenia lebedeva's author's view on the policy of double standards in the project is another, watch on the belarus 24 tv channel . with us on the line is a russian intelligence officer,

svr colonel, mgimo professor, andrei bezrukov, andrey olegovich, hello, good afternoon, here is the detention of durog in france, i simply cannot help but start with this topic, because obviously, it could not have happened without the special services, your profile, it allows us to talk about this more specifically than a whole army of armchair experts is doing now, what is this in your opinion? operations, what is its main goal? the goal is clear: to limit the production and dissemination of information that is not under the control of the west, that is, any source of information and any channel of information that is impossible to control completely, which is not put under control, it is the goal, well , we are talking, as i understand, not only about, let's say, some secrets, yes, which the western intelligence services can get hold of. but in general , information, after all, more than a billion users is a huge ground for sociology, to understand what the masses live, the mood, what they are preparing for, to actually

manage, yes, it's like shashana teeth in america was bred by a professor. people would like to hear, but big brother does not want this, here you go, from the point of view special services, you know, durov cooperated with the special services, it is clear, when some terrorist activity occurs, the special services come to such a company, well, naturally, you can’t do anything, because the danger is completely understandable, you cooperate, but precisely

within the limits of what... what you understand as terrorism, as a danger, as a threat to human life and health, but content moderation, and let’s say, control of some information flows, control of this or that opinion, durov, apparently, refused this, is it worth it for russia to fight for durov? you know, in my opinion it is worth it, not because he is russian, but because telegram has turned into.

the rest of the world, that's where it's a problem, there really is a huge market - the union didn't even dream of it, that's from the point of view of the market of the east, the arab world, india, china, that's where local sources of information are being created now, there is a very active process of forming a middle class there, which wants to know, which wants to talk, which

wants to have its own opinion, that's over...

and we will use any means to hammer you, from information to, god forbid, nuclear, i don't think it will come to that, but nevertheless, you will be an outcast, so think better from the very beginning, it is better to be friends with us and do what we ask you to do, or go and, how to say, promote your own opinion somewhere. andrey ligrovich, and how will it all end? what do you think, well, how will it all end, will it end with our victory, of course, the question is how long will it last, the reader of toda, who is one of the really, just here people who are at the root of the problem look, russia can't lose, for russia it's an absolutely existential task, to win this war, the west, well...

to achieve something, but in the end it's not scary, the same thing that happened in vietnam and the same semi-dictator was hanging around there in vietnam and trying to make something out of himself, but they removed him. it will most likely be the same in ukraine, when the task changed, everything happened the way the west wanted, the united states, specifically, and here, well, everything is repeating itself, before talking to you here we talked with experts in the studio and here tried to understand, here is the provocation around nuclear facilities, which is now being arranged by the enviable, such a terrible one,

what will it get from this war, the second half, naturally, wants to weaken us as much as possible, and let's say, the british and the zelensky regime, well, what are they, our serious facilities, they are well protected, the level of the threat, which, it is not very much, although it hurts, of course, sometimes, and one can ask the question, why this... the question has not been resolved for a long time, but you understand, such civilian facilities as kindergartens, well it is impossible to protect our entire territory, it is huge, the front line is long, well, you

brought in some mlrs, hit it there, left and well, that is terrorism, ordinary terrorism, why, to intimidate the people, so that the people would start talking, and why this regime, so to speak, why...