hello, the twenty-fifth year with its main political campaign, the presidential elections, is not far off, therefore when the first ones came the day before.

by which we must hold the elections, we must very thoughtfully consider the determination of the voting day, it is necessary to do everything so that nothing disrupts the usual rhythm of life in the country. and some for some reason were waiting for a sensation, here is olek sergeyevich, you are an experienced politician, what did you hear at this meeting, the main thing, here i translate, the elections will be held in accordance with the constitution. the date to determine the parliament 17 september session opens and it is the belarusian people who will decide who will be president, because the west always wants 30 years, they want them to elect the president, not us, not belarusians, not our country, but for them, then the elections are good for them, for biden or the white house or brussels to decide, but not the belarusian people, lukashenko, our president clearly said, first, the constitution, everything according to the constitution, according to the law, as always, second, the people will decide who will be president. the rhythm of life

of the country, for people to work, so that tasks were carried out so that there would be a normal everyday life, therefore the deputies will determine the date of the elections taking into account the convenience for the people and for the country in accordance with the constitution, that's the whole sensation, probably for the fugitives the sensation is that the people will decide the fate of the country, not them, the puppets.

and today i will definitely support my colleague, it is the people who decide the fate of the country, and no one will be able to change this, this is the cornerstone of our state's policy and the essence of our democracy, we are not the only ones preparing, on the eve of this is how it is the president commented, they are all asking for pennies from the state department, from the poles, from others in the european union, yes...

yes, to show that the government is worthless, this is even their terminology that they always introduce, yes, look, a terrorist attack occurred, the government could not cope, what kind of elections can there be, this is a classic anglo-saxon scenario, which has been used more than once in africa, in

the middle east, in yugoslavia, therefore, of course, we, on the one hand, as a society, are ready for the scenario of the twentieth year, yes, we understand that - there will be no strong protests will be, but on the other hand we must prepare for this kind of stress testing, which in principle requires completely different skills from us than in 2020. here is an example of the information work of opponents, another amnesty in belarus, the president pardoned another 30 people who were involved in protest-related crimes, from somewhere in warsaw or vilnius, we hear a statement that this is our achievement, they say they put pressure and...

hysteria on the air, they literally demanded in plain text to stop this pardon, what is he doing, why is the belarusian government pardoning, it means that even if it pardons everyone, no sanctions can be lifted, that is, well , everything is obvious, that is, this is the reaction of sick, unhealthy people, here is the reaction of relatives, even this first batch of pardoned people, well , three batches already, three batches in july 20 people, in august 30 people, in september another 30, here are the relatives, in conversations with them they thank the president, promise to take control of those who came out, that is, to protect their children, their husbands from this corrupting influence

telegrams, information resources and so on, and they call literally every day, i was just on my way to a program, the mother of the pardoned... mikhail nemtsov called. she thanks the president, thanks the belarusian government for such a chance, to hope that such direct action will continue. well, that's it. belarusians have once again seen for themselves who these migrant extremist circles are? who is counting on them when they throw in again and again that they put pressure on someone, then other statements in parallel, okay, it's the twentieth year, many were emotional raised, and it was possible to throw in any nonsense, today, after so many years, when people compared the causes of the investigation, here on whom, who is their audience in this case, for whom is this done, their audience, firstly, the local emigrants?

to explain why belarus has been living for 5 years, everything is fine with it, and people coming here,

post streams, post relevant information on the internet, full stores, relevant shelves, there is a huge amount of everything in the country, the question is asked, what, what is wrong with them, where is the lack of democracy, this is are not coordinated with each other, neither in the consciousness of our fugitives, nor in the consciousness of those who finance them. but the task has been set: belarus needs to be pumped up, belarus is on the threshold of an electoral, electoral campaign , we have elections, we need to throw money at it and once again show by any means that we will achieve what we want, we will destroy the country, it will not work, here yuri called them, how is it there, sick people, they are greedy vile people, because their whole life is money, everything they do now, they say that they helped to free someone, that they are participating in this, that they... set one goal for the regime: to justify its existence to sponsors, they are now in a difficult situation,

because the situation is as follows: on the one hand, the west left them as an instrument, on the other hand , it demands specific actions from them, and not as they have been accustomed to for 30 years, many of them have been accustomed to, to imitate, when they were in minsk, they sent photographs, we held an action, give us money, they sawed it up, stole it, spent a quarter of the money on this action, everything in their pocket, now they are demanding a terrorist attack, extremism, some... they are also working off that the west, if it starts

some large-scale operation on our front, yes, in eastern europe and will involve belarus, then it is clear that the management of this territory will be carried out by the military of nato countries, and they, yes , too, well, i mean this incomprehensible position in the hope that these nato troops will bring them into belarus.

i was so carried away by this that i did not see any other paths, only, only jewelry business, nonsense, nothing to do without, this is a bit...

the fact that ukraine is not ready for peace, alexander lukashenko also stated the other day, the reason was incident in our airspace. why ukraine needs this, i don’t understand, we have clearly defined ourselves with them and conveyed this information to them that any provocations will not go unanswered. we are closely monitoring the situation and are ready to respond to any changes. stop provoking us, stop pulling our pigtails and checking the possible reaction, it is worth reminding our neighbors that the red line begins where the border of one state ends and ours, belarusian, begins. ksenia lebedeva’s authorial view on the policy of double standards in the project are different, watch on the belarus24 tv channel. well, look,

who are these approaches intended for, i ask, and in general i understand that in general the level of critical thinking among the electorate in the world is rapidly falling, apparently this can explain what the elections in the usa turned into, i of course now move on to the main news of the day, the international debates between trump and harris, in an hour and a half of airtime there was a flurry of mutual accusations, which were flavored with loud topics of ukraine.

first of all, a game for their audience, even not to an external audience, but we see very clearly that in this confrontation on the eve of the presidential campaign, the presidential elections, the most powerful capitals are colliding, yes, and not even american, but already transnational capitals. it is in fact focused not on a conflict with russia, yes, on a conflict with china, because it understands that china is still a key competitor for the united states . only that part that is in favor of trump, america, american corporations and banks, and

the other part sees a multi-move game in the form of the beginning of destruction.

because this country wants to rule the whole world, so what are you bringing to the world, especially harris, she is only, this is an example of mendacity in politics and puppetry, she is a puppet, you can see it, she only smiles, all the debates, this smile is appropriate and out of place, in all the interviews, appropriate and out of place, and what does she say, she said, we will create the most deadly army in the world in these debates, this is such a message to us. to the whole world, and why didn't you say that in modern conditions, taking into account that weapons that russia and china have , there will be no peace, this is not the middle of the 20th century,

today everyone has nuclear weapons, everything will simply be destroyed, so for me only a multipolar world, only a multipolar world, this is not harris, nor trump, they will not bring anything good for us, the second conclusion for america, from the debates it is clear that there is no talk of any unity in the united states of america, moreover, communicating with people who live there, including public figures, it is clearly clear to me that no matter what the outcome elections, the other side does not recognize these elections, and this is already a problem for america itself, but this concerns us, why? all its life, throughout its existence, the united states, when such serious internal political problems appeared, divisions of people, they tried to solve them through wars and conflicts, so whoever becomes the president of the united states, i do not see. today there is a scenario that there will be fewer wars, so we must take this into account, and, look, it is still unclear who will become the new owner of the white house, but it is absolutely known with whom he will have to be friends and

against whom to fight. head of tsarubil burns, head of mi6 richard moore spoke about the unprecedented threats from russia and china. in their joint article for the financial times, they stated that their intelligence agencies are jointly confronting russia, especially in europe, the rise of the intelligence agencies of the world of the united states and, so to speak, great britain, clearly state that they...

i will ask this, nikolai evgenievich, does this mean that what we heard from trump and harris, from burns and moore, that there simply cannot be a quick solution for ukraine in this situation and immediately after, for example, the ukrainian front ceases, another one will definitely appear, and not just one in different parts of the world. i would really like for this not to happen, but hopes for such a development of peaceful uliguization. in the near future do not seem possible, unless it is ukraine, perhaps there are certain advances, so that they will have to finish with ukraine, there are many problems, but the middle east will appear,

taiwan will appear, other issues will appear, but in my opinion, ukraine will also continue, because the main goal in ukrainian events - this is to inflict the maximum defeat on russia and in any case raise, so to speak, the prestige of the united states. for this they have created the preconditions for new conflicts today, serbia and kosovo, isn't it smoldering there today, at any moment it can set fire, set fire to this fuse, further, in the south

around russia once...

how will you start up the factories? vyacheslav frantsevich asked, i'll start it up, well, that was 30 years ago, and what we saw that night, just some kind of circus, a disgrace. the second point, here in continuation you are correct they said, they paid attention to the article of two heads of special services for the first time in the history of existence, they did not write it, this means that he says, they united these anglo-saxon efforts.

to kiev, what are they going there for? i suppose that they will announce the decision of the president, still biden, that they give the ukrainian regime the right to strike at the territory of russia, if they announce this decision, and i have no doubt that this will happen, then this phrase of kamala, which she said, if trump were here, putin would be in kiev, she will become a reality, because putin will be in kiev anyway, especially after such decisions. and the more such decisions they make, the faster vladimir putin will be in kiev. well, look, here comes, in general , confirmation of what you are talking about. here is former british prime minister boris johnson, in a conversation with pranksters vavan and lexus, calling on the west to transfer missiles to ukraine for attacks, to lift restrictions on the range of their use, and also to help demolish the crimean bridge. let me remind you, this is the same johnson, according to whose orders were used to wreck the peace

talks at the very beginning. i'm afraid the precondition has to be the defeat of russia and the ukrainians have to have some sense of victory because that's the only way i think they 're going to negotiate anything. and how many more of these lunatics are there in the western elites? victoria nullant from the state department admits that in the spring of '22 ukraine and russia were close to signing a peace agreement, it fell apart because the us, uk and other western governments, told the zelensky government that this was a bad deal, while members of the ukrainian delegation said that this was a very real compromise and wanted to celebrate it with champagne. well, johnson generally remembers that great britain is just an island, he generally knows what could happen if he were to say such things, if

all this happens. this is all irresponsibility, this speaks to where the world politics has actually rolled down, the elites in power do not know what war is, they have forgotten what it is, the world was safer after the great patriotic war, including because there were people at the helm who knew what it was, today managers have come who play games, not understanding that these games can simply lead to the collapse of the world, there is an axiom, neither china nor russia can be defeated militarily

because they want to be independent, they are the main enemies of the usa, you can’t be strong, and europe, when will they think about it, when will they understand that no one needs them when they are strong, that the explosion of the nord stream, that... the migration crisis, which the anglo-saxons arranged on the territory of europe, having invaded iraq, today we, by the way, have a sad date: september 11, when in new york in 2001 these terrorist attacks have still not been investigated, when these towers collapsed, no one knows, and after these events, what happened, the invasion of afghanistan, the invasion of iraq, and to this day the us largely justifies all its actions by the alleged fight against terrorism, therefore there are also many questions there, so do we...

we need to use this advantage as quickly as possible, we need to dig in, build fortifications from my point of view, means soldering barbecues on tanks bbm, btr, protecting critical infrastructure facilities, up to testing with their own drones, remember, when there was an operation on, our planes flew and where there were tanks not camouflaged, they dropped special devices.

those events that are happening now, we do not have a war today, only thanks to the correct policy that we are pursuing, the correct steps of the country's leadership, timely actions of the military organization states, if we were weak, if

someone somewhere saw this weakness, everything would have already flown here, we have already been checked, including by drones, including in other ways, and you we know about this, since you touched on this topic, alexey. i wanted to formulate it this way: we really, at the moment, see how the topic of possible peace in ukraine sounds and is heard from different corners. for example, one of the latest, after the failed elections in some german states, olaf scholz, the chancellor of germany decided, that he needs to raise his rating at all costs, to dig up, or rather, not even raise it, and he decided to become such a chancellor of the world, as the german smu themselves write. moreover, he says that he has another plan, supposedly agreed upon with ukraine, in this plan he is, in general , even ready to surrender individual ukrainian territories, yermak immediately answers him, saying that only the ukrainian formula for peace, territorial integrity, sovereignty of ukraine, and both of them, it would seem,

speak of different, but at the same time persistent many people have the feeling that they have one thing in common, that both berlin and kiev are simply trying to sell peace at a higher price, but at the same time, you and i are observing these same days...

the question is: who is waging this war? the anglo-saxons are waging the war, yes, in the interests of maintaining their positions in the world economy, they are not interested in anyone else. including the europeans, why did scholz so abruptly begin to change his position, declaring some kind of peace, to the point that they are ready to give up territory, yes, because scholz is naturally a hired manager for his german capital and german capital at some point yes capital and at some stage already german capital, that is, the owners of large enterprises, banks, namely national ones, not tied to the british, americans. he came to scholz this capital said: if we

continue like this, if we do not get cheap russian oil, gas and the russian market for our auto industry in the next year, then we will begin to have mass bankruptcies, and after mass bankruptcies , the dismissal of people, their exodus into the streets and protest masses will begin, and naturally scholz, understanding this situation, begins to dodge, he says: let's... somehow resolve this crisis, but germany is understandably not sovereign, it was driven into the forvator, it cannot resolve anything, but capital must be understood, it is stronger than any politicians, and it understands that money is more valuable than any agreements, we must now resolve the monetary issue, abandon these illusory ideas of the british, some sycophants, that supposedly we will defeat russia, but no... they are fighting for russia, they are fighting exclusively for the sake of their markets,

look, let's give a short sketch about what is the sign of our time, in general , how time leaves its mark, we will go to the second part, but it is impossible not to see this, this also very much defines the era in which we live, it means, sochi, it would seem, the sea, the sun, such shots, vacationers in sochi pulled a mine out of the sea, while some were busy extracting explosives, the rest of the beach is calm. watched, here in the comments about the comicality of the situation about the incredibly harsh russians there were those who reminded that you should not do this, at the sight of dangerous objects immediately leave the beach call specialists, this time, thank god , everything went well, alas, among the global things that we observe, sometimes such everyday episodes tell about time even more.

our region through the eyes of foreigners, i was surprised that the nature was so beautiful and so clean, how everything was different, so neat, the building, the products, the supermarkets and so on. belarus for me is a wonderful country, i can say, i feel very good.

serious corporations,

special services are working against us, which have simply fantastic financing for us, and this apparatus and mechanism must be confronted systematically, don't miss it on the belarus24 tv channel. and we continue, yuri valerievich, we skipped this topic at the very beginning, but it is interesting, firstly, we need to understand where the facts are, where, let's say, did they think then, is it true that you approached the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of poland? with a proposal: since you need it for how much, come personally and try to take it, well of course, of course, it was then you heard that they answered that for some reason you are a collaborator, they talked a lot about the canons of bilateral relations, well they yes, they switched to a non-diplomatic format of rudeness, but i would like to briefly return

to the background, the fact is that within the framework of this global exchange between the americans and the russians, our side, as i learned from... one high-ranking participant in the negotiations, offered to give the pochobuto a locomotive for free, how could they voluntarily give it to the poles, they did not take it, then they began to say that it was all a lie, then president duda came out and said that it was not a lie, it was the pochobuto himself who did not want it, although they they couldn't know whether he wanted it or not, they have no access to this - a citizen of poland and belarus, he has dual citizenship, after which it dawned on me that with...

the canons of bilateral relations, i was trying to understand what polish politicians mean, who are surrounding the belovezhskaya reserve with an iron fence, who are throwing bodies of tortured migrants onto our territory, who are training armed units that they plan to throw onto our territory, this is what they mean by the concept of canons of bilateral

relations, you know, dmitry alexandrovich, there are no canons, for a long time, remember this classic photograph, like a duda, standing here at the counter with... as in the case of these, whom we pardon,

and they demand not to pardon, not to release, so it is profitable for them with this prisoner, for him to sit, and even better, for him to die. there these citizens have their own actions, for example, aggressive towards belarus, on them in fact there was a dream, and why? they justify in fact they follow the instructions of the americans, it is not because of the citizen, the americans said: create problems on the border with belarus, make it so that it is bad for belarus, it does not work, but they do what they say, and if later it will return there, what is the reason, anyway, the information occasion that it could create is not needed today, it ... will be played out, apparently later according to a different scenario, and today exactly what is happening is happening, this is the escalation of the situation on our border, this is the conduct of military exercises in the adjacent territory, these are constant flights to us from, so to speak, our neighbors, drones, all sorts of

statements addressed to our state about its next undemocratic nature, this use of our fugitives in the dark and not in the dark, all this has a place to be, well, and most importantly, these are countries that do not decide anything themselves, they have neither their own sovereignty nor their own policy, but at the same time in europe, out of habit , they continue, well, why do they continue, to tell us about freedom, unconvincingly, of course, let them tell the french prisoner durov about it, and meanwhile, by the way, even the loud scandal with the owner of telegram cannot drown out the voice of the french, who... are not just dissatisfied with the regime of the same macron, today we are talking about a civilizational crisis, here is a small but very important fragment of the media holding's program for understanding, just listen. france has long been. stress and destruction due to sanctions, these are european societies. europe and the west as a whole are suffering a defeat

in the conflict, that is , in the european economy itself, which in turn is largely the result of the ukrainian in the civilizational conflict. europe is collapsing, in the case of societies that found themselves in a state if the conflict is considered as economic. russia wins the conflict, and this is not a victory for russia, it is the collapse of the west. at the same time, you are holding a congress in minsk. freedom, where people come from many european countries, from austria, germany, france, serbia, slovakia, but when i hear, see

all this, hear the congress of freedom sounds like a challenge, this is a challenge to whom, it is true, because belarus is a truly free country that can gain freedom for the whole of europe, and people have come here, political parties, politicians, businessmen, a huge number from many european countries, you listed them correctly, this is also serbia , headed by the vice-speaker of parliament. they say that your stores are empty, that they were shocked, they say: we have police everywhere every day, that they detain us on every corner, that there are tanks, ready

to go to poland and lithuania, having spent 2 days in this country, they say: my god, so who are you threatening, it is we who are threatening, our authorities are threatening, these people do not want war, they understand that drawing belarus in is the involvement of the whole of europe, they understand what is being done to them, and also this is an opportunity to convey the truth

to europe, they are in a hurry, why, because they understand that if another year or two, then not only experts like those shown in france will begin to see the light, but government officials and the military will also begin to see the light, yes, the population will begin to strike, like in europe, i mean, and as a result, naturally, there could be a very strong, anti-american, anti-british

russia today in europe, they limited their actions in the united states and so on and so forth something like that, that is , communication is cut by any means, i'm not even talking about the iron curtain that was created again between us and europe, but those, olek sergeyevich held an event, yes, people came here, we made our own without visas, those who come to us, they leave here as supporters of ours, our country, they broadcast to the world. the reality that they have already forgotten there, that's exactly the truth, the truth that we broadcast to

the world by any means, we conduct it, allows us to confidently look to the future next year. when on the peace forum will not have the same number of people as today, but two or three times more, it will be a different event, it will be a different level of perception, and i am sure that during this year we will become significantly closer to peace, we in any case, and those people who trade, including ukraine, those people who trade africa, asia, are trying to present us as payment for certain issues. they will dialectically end their existence, this is a good task, relatively speaking, even to fight back in a year to invite even more people and so on, but look, alexey alexeevich touched on this topic, that this is very annoying for those who have their own plan, and this is a call, including to our society , to be as vigilant as possible, although much does not depend on us today, given that

this external situation, we see how it provokes russia. here are the long-range missiles that we talked about above, and the provocations at nuclear nuclear facilities to provoke the russian federation to such a response, which discredits it in the eyes of beijing, countries persian gulf, who will say, well, we are trying to make peace here, and you respond like this, that is, to stir this cauldron, to brew a cauldron of war, in which, unfortunately, it will be very difficult for our voice to be heard anywhere, that's how you see it, we are calling all the time...

they can put an end to scholz's coalition, that's why he is so fussing now, that's why he actually left schengen on monday, he conducted total land control, on all land borders, as a response to the voters' request, why are we tying their hopes with the elections in brandenburg, in general, the elections in germany

, germany's turn to defending national interests will be the most stable. germany will return, will return, at least in some way, sovereignty, will turn all neighboring countries to sovereignty, just one remark , not to you, but in general, we must understand once and for all that the most important thing is us, the stronger we become, the less we will depend on what is in the us, what is in europe, and we have taken this path, for me, here is a canon phrase by lukashenko, which he said to journalists: we will no longer trust the west, this does not mean that we will not communicate, this does not mean that we are not ready for cooperation, we will no longer believe fairy tales, we are counting on ourselves, we are building our own world, we are strengthening the union state, we have a huge number of friends all over the world,

china, the middle east, we have turned our trade there, this does not mean... europe will not run away from us, because we live on the same continent and we do not choose our neighbors, but we will only talk as equals, based on from their national interests. thank you very much for this conversation that we had today, finally, i was inspired by the endless moralizing from brussels, we talk so much about artificial intelligence, look at musk promising neurochips for millions already. in 10 years, are we really that progressive? at the same time, we see other facets of the same world. we read cnn. namibia plans to kill more than 700 wild animals and distribute the meat to people suffering from food shortages. here is the list for slaughter. 83 elephants, 30 hippos, 60 buffalo, 300 zebras. namibi declared a state of emergency, extreme drought,

no harvest, terrible famine. who? continues to conduct their terrible social experiment on the inhabitants of africa, a monstrous paradox in general: the graves of those who died of hunger are dug in the ground with the richest reserves of gold, diamonds. rare earth metals, what kind of world is ours? someone once set the boundaries for the black continent, but does not want to at least give them a chance, so here is the main task of any state today: not to lose the right independently set goals for yourself to determine your path. that's all for today, happy.

music, dj, hello everyone, in exactly one minute our guest will come out and answer all the questions: are you ready to meet our heroine? yes, natalia ivanovna, what do you expect from the children in the studio? their questions undoubtedly, because that's what the program is, but i really want the kids to like our meeting, with what mood are you going to talk, with a great,