hello viewer, my name is igor tur, this is my propaganda, let's start and i will start today from afar, who poses the greatest threat today to the belarusian statehood, our sovereignty and the peace of belarusians. surely the most popular answer will be directly, indirectly point to, well, the united states of america, because washington is not directly delighted with the fact that these belarusians do not bend in any way, their obedient instrument of international influence, and this is nato, alas , poland, and even more, alas, the european union. and here i will make a remark that in general, as for me, it is to our national advantage that the eu stops being the obedient dog of the usa, that the eu has an independent economy, and not today's, which has completely fallen under... washington, and

an independent economy is an independent policy, and if europe ever starts such a fight for its independence from the americans, then very quickly truly intelligent western politicians will bring their people to the realization that they need to be friends not with some americans, with moscow, which is more than ready to be friends politically and economically, russia has a stake here, naturally in the form of oil and gas, so if we ever return to european politics at this level...

it's a shame, especially for those who continue to consider themselves supposedly free. in fact, the least free belarusians, now, as always, are those who are the doll soldiers of democracy. but it's great that many are already beginning to understand this, we will continue to help them. but still, there is no enemy more dangerous than an ally- idiot. yes, i believe that the main threat to the national security of the country, at the current stage, is very active citizens with their own opinion, but without the necessary level of knowledge for this opinion, not possessing. information, not

listening to what the authorities tell them, protecting their country, the us has a strategy, so the strategy can be determined by us, we can develop a set of measures so that this clear strategy is not implemented, the european union has a strategy, nato has some, our western neighbors and governments them, and i'll even say frankly, some of the fugitives also have some kind of strategy, an unrealizable truth, but still some kind of strategy, when some forces have a strategy... no, it's impossible to effectively develop countermeasures, because no one, including these forces themselves, have any idea what they'll do, well, at least tomorrow. let's use the example in the last issue, i told you, well, a story that was popular a couple of years ago on social networks, if you shake a glass jar in which there are red and black ants, out of fear and misunderstanding of what 's happening, the red ones will gnaw to death black, and the black red, they will consider themselves mortal enemies, but they are not, because until the moment when the can was not shaken, they lived... in a world of harmony, being

of different colors, they have one and common enemy, the one who shakes the can, and it would be very good for the red and black to understand this, this will be very important, if we assume that it is known for certain that this can will be shaken again, and if another thought of the previous program belarus, through the mouths of representatives of the armed forces, commenting on the drone shot down in the south of the country, says this: recorded the fact of a violation of the border in the airspace, presumably by unmanned aerial vehicles, all... the targets of the violators have been destroyed, an investigation is underway, then knowing about the event in this particular formulation and not thinking up anything else will mean protecting the interests of your state. people who have knowledge and information of a classified nature do not set as their primary goal to hide something from everyone, to come out and say it like it is, in fact, this is the easiest thing. the task of these people is to protect the homeland and its citizens, and the citizens would it would be nice to help the motherland in protecting itself. for this, if... the motherland asks, even if not

directly, not to invent and not to blab too much, it is necessary not to invent and not to blab too much, but not a day has passed, as some online chatterboxes from among the fugitives wrote, like tur called on belarusians to remain silent not to... ask questions, no freedom of speech, what 's going on, punishment and so on. i will publicly advise this writer to continue writing about love, about sex and other rosy things, and not to get into serious topics, if you are a populist fool, because the next day, after the previous propaganda release, the president, whose main task today is one: preventing war on the territory of belarus, a task with which alexander grigoryevich copes brilliantly, said the following: from mid-september... to the beginning of november, the united states expects a significant escalation of the military situation, both from moscow and from kiev on the front. western intelligence agencies are talking about belarus as a possible place of escalation. they need a war.

at the same time, this is not about the entry of the armed forces of our country into combat actions, we never do that. the president says that the us expects escalation on the front from both ukraine and russia, therefore, escalation on both sides at the current stage is beneficial to washington, and if it is beneficial to them, then it is not worth going to the granny. it is definitely not beneficial to russia and it is not beneficial to belarus, i know for sure what the same not very smart fugitives can do after these words of mine to pull out my quotes from previous years, in which i said that at the moment, it seems, it is necessary to stop the war and prevent the death of hundreds of thousands of people, it is necessary, so that the russian armed forces are as

tough as possible. this sounds inhumane, of course, especially if you are far from politics, but often in it you have to make a decision, choosing the lesser of two evils, when there is no third , when there are only two options: a decision that leads to the death of thousands of people at once, or a decision that leads to the death of hundreds of thousands of people over the course of a year, in my opinion, the right decision is still the first, although it is colossally difficult for the one who must make it. i have another example. vladimir putin tells about an incident with a civilian aircraft. there are more than 40,000 spectators at the fisht stadium, olympians representing 88 countries and heads of 48 states at once. i was handed a phone, one of the heads of the operational headquarters for ensuring the security of the olympic games called and reported that a plane was hijacked, which was supposed to fly from ukraine to istanbul, the hijackers demanded landing in sochi. an sos signal was transmitted by

a boeing 737 800 of the turkish airline pegasus airlines, flying from kharkov to istanbul. the pilots managed to report that one of the passengers. bomb, i asked what you propose, and the answer is waiting, according to the plan, a case of such a development of the situation is provided for, that is, to shoot down. there are 10 passengers on board the boeing, but if the terrorist's target is olympic sochi, they will die, and thousands of other people. something has to be sacrificed in this situation. i said, act according to the plan, five minutes, maybe seven passed, a second call rang out, the same head of the headquarters on the security line said that it was a drunken prank, the plane is heading to turkey, soon sits down, what did you manage to feel during this time between the two calls, it seems to me

that it is better not to talk about it, this is what politics is, it is the need to make a difficult but correct decision, but what decision should be considered correct, the more... information you have, the higher the probability of making the right decision, who has the most information in the country, alexander lukashenko, who is the president, who is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, if the representative of the army, who i very much admit, really knows whose drone was shot down, where it came from arrived, who launched it and for what purpose, but if he does not publicly say all this to the general public, then it is necessary for something, of course, and so that the population does not panic, although if a drone falls somewhere, then in general... for panic, in fact, it is completely secondary whose it is and where it came from, and the military has no desire to hide anything from the people, they have, as commander-in-chief, a desire to protect the people, for this it is necessary to say about the drone, exactly as it was said publicly, and if suddenly the people, although rather

in total, some people do not understand this, if someone demands, tell us who it is and that do not hide anything, then you know, such citizens with their curiosity and desire to play... "we have rights, you demand to increase the likelihood of war in belarus and at home." in my opinion, this is the most idiotic demand that can be heard publicly now, trust the authorities with this. will you help them maintain peace in our common country? well, as for drones, alexander lukashenko on the same tuesday already spoke more than openly on this topic that's it, people didn't tell you this right away, but still, as honestly as possible: we agreed under the channel with the ukrainians that we will not highlight in the media the facts of drones flying in and russian ukrainian ones on ours. and not russian ones, although on

the other hand it happens. well, now let's talk about this fragment of alexander lukashenko's speech, were you glad to hear it? hmm, on the one hand, yes, because, suddenly, for someone it's a secret, but minsk , yes, is conducting closed negotiations with kiev, with warsaw, berlin, paris, washington, trying to... find common ground for the main goal of preventing war on the territory of belarus, everyone has closed communication channels with everyone, i assure you, moscow has the same channels, with the ukrainian side, with the american side, because everyone has national interests that need to be achieved by any available means, but on the other hand, when i heard these words from the president, i was rather upset, because if we agreed on something with the ukrainians, it means we took a step forward to protect our national interests.

ukraine will continue to be pushed towards self-destruction, which creates risks for us too. and now the most radical idea of ​​this program is that for us, washington's actions are criminal and disgusting, of course, as for millions of people on the planet, but washington only protects the us americans, only this is their task, in general, if they try to achieve it by any, even bloody, methods, this cannot be approved, but it can be understood. the us is now backed against the wall, moscow is far from being the first to try to break the dollar world, which for decades was the basis of

america's comfortable existence, all those who tried to get rid of the dollar and pursue their own policy drowned in blood. it will not be possible to drown nuclear russia in blood, so the national interests of the united states are in big trouble and, in fact , they are backed up against the wall. a cornered beast , even a weak one, is very dangerous, because nothing can be stronger than the instinct to survive, and the united states is currently deciding the question of its survival, because if the dollar continues to be pressed like this, almost everyone the world, they have big problems, up to the point of disintegration into separate states, when they conduct closed negotiations, their goals are never known for sure, maybe the strategy chosen is to roll back the conflict and peace initiatives, or maybe this is disinformation in order to prepare for a new escalation, in all this belarus is represented on the world stage by alexander lukashenko personally only by him, because such is our power structure, and he is now sorting out all this, walking on the thinnest ice, which sometimes even creaks underfoot. on the day of national unity very many people said that if we are united, we will not win, in which we need to be

united, yes, in everything, everyone also said confidently, but it is especially important now to be united in understanding what lukashenko is doing in the unconditional fulfillment of all his orders and even hints, a lot depends on this now, i want to ask the americans, do you want peace, peace talks or an escalation of the situation? met with the head of the donetsk people's republic denis pushilin. naturally,

various other propagandists began to assure to his audience that this was, supposedly, some kind of signal from lukashenko. they say it was either a signal to the east, since he met, then once again recognized the dpr as part of russia, although, frankly speaking, it is not entirely clear what kind of recognition is needed for an obvious fact: the dpr is a russian region, which was previously the ukrainian donetsk region, which kiev then began to consider separatists to be shelling, from what? the dpr and lpr began to seek and achieved the status of special regions, until a special expression of the will of the people to return to russia and cooperates with donetsk at all stages. on the principles of mutual respect, peace and support minsk, no matter what happens with the regions at the political or military levels, the belarusian attitude towards the residents of donbass has always been stable, as towards the people of ukraine, the people can be forced to have a different attitude towards belarus, but we treat ukrainians, that is , minus the nazis and other scum, we treat ukrainians with love and are ready to cooperate

honestly with everyone who is ready to respond to us in kind, here are different hints. and so on, even from the west, that you will be cooperate, you will offend ukraine, we do not offend anyone, we are absolutely ready to cooperate with ukraine on such principles, so do not attack us here, pile on, we are people of peace and at the basis of our friendship and cooperation is only peace. for belarusian politics, the most important principle is still harmony and balance in relations with everyone and with yourself, including. and for this you need to be. honestly, alexander grigorievich often says that history must be seen as it really was and in its entirety. this concerns our ancient history, history of the times of the grand duchy of lithuania and the polish-lithuanian commonwealth, and history as part of the russian empire, the soviet union, up to modern sovereignty, but this also concerns history, so to speak, our most recent one, it also needs to be seen as it really is

, not directly, but indirectly, alexander lukashenko said this at a meeting with the heads of the central election commissions of the cis countries. always sincerely, honestly admitted that it does not happen that they put pressure on us from abroad, and we start either to stagger, or someone starts to hang around in the streets, which means there are internal some reasons, we know these reasons, we have clearly defined them, made the appropriate conclusions, learned lessons from those events so that this does not happen again, it is fantastically well noticeable how history sees such a thing, what... was in fact without restrictions or convenient and pleasant exceptions for himself or someone else, alexander lukashenko, there was everything in our history, but it was, history is always written to please politics, the president also said this, and this is generally an axiom, is modern history written to please politics belarus, of course, but there is a nuance: belarusian politics and the authorities of belarus, that

is, the president wants history to be written honestly, he wants it not for tactical... tasks for today, but for strategic ones for tomorrow, so thank you to the head of state for what he wants, for it to be honest for what he intends to achieve with this, and also thank you to everyone who understands the first, the second and helps the president to implement this honesty, and it must be done, another quote from lukashenko, everything is in time, now sanctions are difficult, but this is the lack of competition in the market, in this situation belarusian enterprises will either retain their shares, in general they will live rather well and... they will make some extra efforts, increase production, expand their market shares, they will feel more confident when competition returns after the lifting of sanctions, and there is reason to believe that this will happen much sooner than is commonly thought in society, so when the president says that we need to stop bowing to the polish apple, it is not only about polish, but also not only about the apple,

well today sanctions, they bring, they don't bring, ok, you have a free rein, tomorrow... but in general it's symbolic, on tuesday the president talks about the possibility of a third world war, and already on friday he studies how apples grow, because in the economy there are no trifles, because the global situation is formed from them, and if apples grow and sell poorly in the country, this also slightly increases the risks of a threat in... in the military sphere, it would be great to understand for everyone to do what the president asks from all of us, to do our job, my name is igor tur, this was my propaganda.