and this is not the beginning of a horror movie, but reality. such options were offered in some private boarding houses. due to repeated complaints about poor quality of social services , monitoring groups have been monitoring the situation since 2022. the owners of boarding houses were given orders to eliminate the shortcomings. contagious skin diseases, such as chasotka, were registered and spread. with what infectious status the service personnel enters there, a big question also arose. vmudryali.

living conditions to organize a comprehensive food and provide quality medical services, in fact, basic requirements that should be in place even at the creation stage. here is a positive example of a private boarding house in pinsk, where 40 people live, providing services to those who cannot do without outside help. among the guests are not only residents of pinsk and the region, but also from baranovichi, mogilev and minsk. i have been living here for eight years.

we have a box for each guest, a list of medicines, we lay out the dishes, we always monitor the expiration date expiration dates, we, first of all, cannot have expired dates, because each resident, relatives, also i prescribe medications at the clinic and as soon as they run out, we immediately receive a new institution successfully eliminated the shortcomings and today received a license, there was a lot of work. thanks to all the services that prompted us, helped, all the requirements that were needed to obtain a license, we fulfilled, everyone has their own characteristics, their own character, their own worldview, we are to everyone we are trying to find an approach. in january of last year, by order of the chairman of the pinsk district executive committee, a commission was created, which was held quarterly.

81 state and 24 private institutions, and not a single person in need will be left without attention. organizations that do not receive a license within the specified period can work on it, and for their residents , the issue of alternative forms of living arrangements is being considered, for example, in another boarding house or home services, where there is a nurse, and day care, and long-term care. in there are more than one and a half million elderly citizens in belarus, this is almost every sixth resident of the country, over 65 years old. therefore, the task

of licensing is not to remove competitors in the form of the private sector, on the contrary, to organize a single rule of the game for everyone in the social services market, because caring for elderly citizens is a common cause. state and society. elizaveta sinyak, anna buikevich, the first information. there are no restrictions for active longevity. this is proven by the nordic walking marathon. today it opened the republican cycle of events for the international day of people of respectable age. the country's golden asset gathered in grodno, in each region of the minsk region, energetic athletes in a sports dress code, of course, from the support group, came to the start. for the third time , the scandinavian-style festival brings together fans of an active lifestyle. this year , a record number of participants, almost fifty amateur athletes. the task is to cover a kilometer distance at speed. the route runs around a pond among the autumn landscapes of the zaslavl park of culture and recreation.

you come home, euphoria. the husband says: well, how cheeks burning? i say: amazing, generally cool. well, here we meet, communicate.

nations and education of the younger generation. every year october 1 is a day of special attention to people of venerable age. for more than 30 years the holiday has been considered international. this was the information picture of this monday, right after the panorama, watch understandable politics. show for billions. how much do american elections cost why the vote of voters almost does not decide anything. all the best and do not switch.

is gaining momentum, election campaign, show under the slogan of democracy, where the richest person is often right, the most expensive elections in the world are breaking records with each new battle for the white house. bloomberg recently noted that harris spends more than trump in pursuit of votes,

$7.5 million every day, while trump only has $2.6. how finances affect the outcome of elections, how much money is needed to become president, who really opens the door to the white house, just the facts. it's up to you to draw your own conclusions.

the expenses of the last election race in the united states were record-breaking, exceeding $14 billion and doubled compared to budgets previous battle for the white house. in 2016 , politicians were much more modest. it is noted that these 14 billion include expenses on the election campaigns of presidential candidates, participants in the fight for seats in the house of representatives from congress, the national committees of the republican and democratic parties, as well as political action committees that support various candidates. in general, over the past half century, the expenses of the election campaigns of candidates for the highest office in the united states have grown more than a thousand times, once starting with only 2 million dollars. such huge figures, which really amaze american elections, are due to the fact that in america this is a huge industry. with a large number of political strategists,

political scientists, experts, public opinion specialists involved in it, and party machines of activists who are largely fed by these elections, and this is a way to keep these machines in good shape. this is how budgets have been inflated over the past half century, the road to the white house has always been made of green bills, but today spending is simple. ghanaian in the sixties john kennedy could hardly imagine that his 10 million for the company in the 21st century would be enough for one day. nixon, reagan, clinton's sharp jump, well, then just a gigantic increase in pre-election spending. trump and biden in the twentieth, it seems, did not count the losses at all. compare with 1992, then the third racer participated in the race - an independent candidate, a billionaire, rosperro. he was by no means a weak competitor, he seriously influenced the alignment. perot, who participated, unlike previous independent candidates in a three-way televised debate, gained 18.9%

of the vote, more than any independent since 1912. so, ross publicly announced that he was putting $1 billion into his victory. the law allowed this, since these were not other people's contributions, but ross's personal money, and he could spend it as much as he wanted. $1 billion in the early nineties, today , at our prices, probably all of $10 billion. but even with such a sum, the businessman was very far from his cherished goal, and now imagine that both harris and trump are counting on their own money win, here is ross with his current 10 billion, would not even come close to winning, as he did not come close in 1992, what funds should really be invested in the election campaign, how many billions did the candidates hide from the eyes of ordinary americans, somewhere around 9 billion each, at least in the usa. two things are constant: voters, as a rule, do not decide anything, and

hollywood passions require cool decorations. us presidential elections require large funds, because you need to finance trips across the country, salaries of employees headquarters, production of campaign materials, services of dozens of consultants, political strategists, rent of premises, organization of rallies, conferences, congresses and, finally, advertising of candidates. now. briefly, how the financial machine works: only the presidential candidate himself can make unlimited contributions to his election fund. there are restrictions regarding other donors. by law, each us citizen can contribute no more than $2,800 to the needs of the election campaign. political organizations can also contribute funds and political action committees. these are organizations that unite people on business, labor or ideological principles. a candidate can receive from one such organization. the americans know how to confuse the viewer; since 2010, super

political action committees have appeared in the country. for them, unlike simple political committees, there are no limits on the amount of collections. this is where large sponsors often pour big money. it seems that the law prohibits transferring directly to the election headquarters, but there is a loophole here too. no one interferes, for example, with these money to organize a large-scale campaign of support. of their candidate, that is, it is not the candidates who compete, but financial magnates and corporations for their right to receive dividends, that is, ordinary voters decide little here, money decides everything. fundraisers raised $400 million for trump from april to june of this year alone, in 2016 the candidate raised the same amount, but during the entire election campaign. huge sums were received during the active consideration of lawsuits against trump in may-june 2024. for example, on just one day, may 31, funds supporting the former head of the united states

received more than 450 thousand dollars. for 200 years , a two-stage election system has been in place in america. first , the electoral college is elected by popular vote, and then it is the college that elects the head of state, that is, the winner is the one who has collected more votes from the electors, not direct voters, and there is also a two-month early voting that is not controlled by society, no access to observers, and a bunch of other nuances of local freedom. the procedure for presidential elections in the united states is significantly differs from the procedure in other democratic countries of the world. it is complex and multi-stage, and victory among ordinary voters is not...

a separate feature of american elections is debates, demonstrative conversations in front of the camera, sometimes they make you laugh, cry, feel very sad, like this time. at first , everything seems logical, the candidate tells his program, and people think whether to support him or not, that's what actually happened. were president, putin would have captured kiev now, we must understand why nato's european partners are now grateful that he is no longer president, well, let's first tell this one that people don't come to her rallies, she pays them to

come there, i suggest we leave this debate now and see. so that she goes to washington, we are wasting time now, let's go, she was so bad, it's terrible, let's go to washington, let her sign a law that will close the border. trump's phrase about democrats eating cats even became a viral hit on the internet. the trump meme hit the top lines on social networks trends, harris tried to interrupt him, the politician had important statements, but the scam was left with only earrings that could have been headphones. american journalist johnny king said that during the debate harris used a special nova h1 earphone disguised as an earring, which is why the politician was constantly taking notes in a notebook, although

both are strictly prohibited by the debate rules. however, the moderator of the discussion. commercial breaks, now also paid ones, in which advertising starts at $ 500,000, here they are for the whole country, and they call each other names, come up with some obscene nicknames for each other, they don't fight, this is not a competition of political strategies and us development strategies, this is

some kind of name-calling and some kind of bullying from two immature teenagers. there is nothing bad in popcorn, but while crunching corn and chips, presidential candidates are actually trying to decide the fate of the world. the war in ukraine, the conflict with china, and finally, nuclear weapons. this is where your appetite disappears. however, we are not the first to criticize the culture of american debates. debates today turned into a farce, an entertainment show of sorts, where you only have one minute or 90 seconds or 3 minutes. you are physically unable to formulate any idea in that time. another edition. post announced a debate show program, in which people speak who are not responsible for anything, although the fact that publicly beating each other, a theater of farce, absurdity of madness became clear already in 2016 after the fight.