on the belarus 24 tv channel, this is news from abroad, broadcasts of especially important events, live broadcasts from the scene, current interviews with famous belarusians, fascinating trips around the country,

feature films for all ages. on the territory of the countries: finland, sweden, norway, denmark, the netherlands, germany, france, spain, portugal, cyprus, austria, switzerland, italy, greece, romania, serbia, croatia, poland, lithuania, latvia, estonia. set up a satellite. the tv channel signal is broadcast in open form and is available 24 hours a day every day. be with the belarus 24 tv channel and discover belarus.

hello, we have many topics, but of course, let's start with this, the whole world is talking about iran's missile strikes on israel today, despite all the threats from washington, tehran's response to the death of the hezbollah secretary general, the head of the hamas politburo and the commander of the quts forces, followed. hundreds of missiles, many of which broke through. the iron dome, there were reports that a large-scale cyber attack against air defense systems took place in parallel, while the white house announced biden's order to shoot down iranian missiles, the farsi agency and others reported that at least 80% of the shells hit their targets and even that dozens of the newest f-35 aircraft were destroyed. in turn, the israel defense forces assured that the iranian missile attack did not damage the combat capability of the country's air force. heads. israel instructed ambassadors

to notify the heads of state that israel, quote, will give a harsh response. a little earlier, before this attack, the pentagon threatened iran with serious consequences in the event of interference in conflict. and now there is a barrage of missiles and warnings from the islamic revolutionary guard corps. we are ready to strike at us bases in the region if america does something stupid. olga igorevna, but hasn't washington already done something stupid?

"it is already difficult to apply sanctions against iran, because almost all the potential has already been used up there, here the statements concern the fact that it is necessary to show once again that the united states of america is a hegemon that does not sleep at night monitoring the state of affairs in the world, this is more the rhetoric of the great powers than having real resources to influence the situation, because israel has repeatedly proven that america's opinion, yes, it is taken into account, but it is not prevailing, and today". iran did the same,

that's the most important thing to look at in this situation, how the americans will play in reality, they very rarely encounter a situation when everyone seems to accept your opinion, but in reality. first, it means that everyone understands perfectly well that iran is one of the key players in the middle east, drawing it into a full-scale war, it is actually like the house of cards will collapse the entire region, absolutely all experts have spoken about this, today first, i want to note restraint. iran, which even now, having launched missile strikes on israel, says that it does not want a big war, this shows that they understand their responsibility in the middle east, they understand perfectly well what this can lead to. now the step is again for the united states, because this morning, israel said that they

are refraining from striking iran for now, but will launch it in the coming days after consultations with the white house and the united states of america, that is, again , it depends on the united states of america today. further escalation, everything that is happening today is their doing. the palestinian-israeli conflict could have been resolved diplomatically, absolutely everyone in the un was talking about it, all this could have been done by creating a palestinian state, by reaching an agreement between the jews and the palestinians, everyone was ready for this, in fact, but who didn’t want it, the americans, they don’t need it, they want to divide and rule in the middle east, they have always set the shiites against each other, sunnis, allavis, kurds, jews, that's great, but not for...

iran, israel, will be drawn into other countries, the americans will have to participate in this war directly, not indirectly. here the actions of the israeli government, i compared a little with zelensky, that is, zelensky dreams of drawing nato in, a direct war with russia, and israel in this situation, with its actions, can push the united states to direct action, not only to shoot down missiles, as they are doing now, not only, that is, to provide assistance, but to fight. and this is fraught with the loss of us influence on the contrary, because as soon as american bases start to explode, the myth of america's unsinkability, that it is a great power, will immediately collapse. oleg sergeevich, does this mean that the situation is getting out of washington's control, or is this just the same old

pattern? look, now, when this escalation began, iran through diplomatic channels, and this was later voiced in the media, made it clear that let 's not escalate, let's try to get on a peaceful track, then this aggravation with lebanon happened, the strikes on the leaders of hezbollah and the fact that we observed this night, at the same time everyone at this moment is already remembering what happened with the istanbul agreements, when they said: "guys, ok, we'll agree, let's deal with the issue", and then johnson's order began and what we have been seeing for 2 years on the southern border, i will answer very briefly and quickly, all the actions of the us today in the middle east are the collapse of their authority, ultimately this will lead to the loss of the united states. and this is no longer what they wanted, the authority of the us, even those countries of the middle east that do not interfere in conflict, they understand everything perfectly, see and hate the usa, and this is the crack of their policy. you know why the guns are talking now, because diplomats have exhausted their potential, reached

a dead end, and belarus and the russian federation , through their foreign ministry, have always called for a peaceful resolution of the conflict. but you know, i have been watching the israeli broadcasts in recent days.

but we are in favor of an immediate solution, this is all through diplomacy at the un, and it is not just that the situation is really like this,

the first reaction of the world media, it is clearly shows how intense. guardian: iran's strikes on israel signal that the regional conflict long feared has finally flared up. new york times, perhaps the most dangerous moment in the middle east's modern history has arrived, a ballistic missile war that could escalate into a standoff involving other countries, including. us, here's the daily mail, to quote, iran's attack on israel is the most dramatic moment in their conflict a possible catalyst for a full-scale war in region. aleksan vladimirovich, well, the thing is that i am more inclined to the version that this is a scenario, that everything that is happening, it was all planned and directed. in the end, the situation is being led specifically to that war that we are even afraid to mention. and to say why? because the middle east is not just some

political options, it is first of all the economy, the economy of the whole world from the point of view of corridors, from the point of view of traffic, various resources, and so on. you will see if the middle east flares up, this means that the straits that connect different parts of the world will stop working, then... that source of resources, which in this case is arab oil, gas, and so on, is immediately excluded. based on this, it immediately hits the, as they say, hands, feet, and everything else, of china, whose goods go through these directions, it bends india, then, this is - plus to everything else these sanctions that in europe are against... in fact, the silk road, they also hit china, therefore, by launching the mechanism of war in

the middle east, america, in fact, declares war, which china, that's all, in general, let's go further, in general we have to admit that you in the west are not used to learning from mistakes, another example, this time closer to us, there is a character in the western political theater, well, such a... frankly comedic, this is borrell, the same one who compares europe to a garden, and the rest of the world to a jungle, like why do they need such a diplomat, it's for such throwing in of lies that he said that he does not want ukraine to become the second belarus. without our support, ukraine would have to surrender. and if this is what they are proposing, then it is not our case. we do not want to end the war like this. we do not want ukraine to surrender, to lose its identity, freedom and territory, becoming a second belarus.

this should be clear. here he speaks and nowhere is it said what the ukrainians want. and we do not want, god forbid, to become not only a second ukraine, but at least a second baltic, moldova or something else that the west is already picking up. ukrainians every day they die, he says: you fight on, continue to fight, we don’t want... to become belarus, while belarus is a sovereign, independent, peaceful country, one of the only countries in the post-soviet space where there was no war, where there were no conflicts on national-religious grounds, where any person, of any nationality, of any language lives, works, toils and lives, and he says: we don’t want ukraine to become belarus, what are you talking about, if you’re talking about sovereignty, then mr. barel, not today europe stands on knees, you have no sovereignty, you hold accountable. politicians like marie lupin, how you stifle an alternative for germany, for what? do you think there are disputes

about the economy? no, any european politician who says: not for russia, not for belarus, let's become independent, let france become independent from the usa, all your lies, and you can't talk to us about sovereignty, so of course, he is a liar, a scoundrel, the ukrainians, the time will come, they hate him, i am already sure, whoever understands at least something, knows at least some truth, because what he wants... to continue to put millions of dollars in their pockets by the hands of ukraine, the ukrainian people, and people to die, and the country to be destroyed, it practically no longer exists, this is a continuation of our first question, when someone from... a wonderful garden tries to say what he sees in the middle east, what he sees in asia, what he sees in our i will support my colleague, he is absolutely right about the scenario, but the trouble is that the americans themselves can get what they get from this scenario, that's what they are afraid of, if tomorrow their bases start to be bombed, if a large war in the middle east, the game will end, we will have to fight, and this is huge, close the topic about the blooming sayat, but so that they do not think

that we suddenly took offense at barel, here is how the inhabitants of this garden see its prospects, the prime minister of hungary, viktor orban... with his characteristic frankness concludes the bell is already ringing in europe explains the european union is turning into a second- tier economy. the gdp of asian countries, on the contrary , is growing rapidly, and russia and brics are getting stronger. if brussels continues to ignore the problem. nothing good awaits the region. it is difficult not to agree. so the region does not expect anything good, including because we were presented with new european commissioners. one lady.

the peoples of the european union occupy, especially political parties occupy some kind of pro-european position, a pro-russian position, and want to negotiate with russia, this is still a long way off, right-wing parties came to austria in 2000, they also the freedom party were in the government together with the people's party, this rightward tilt, it seems to me, we are assessing it a little incorrectly, because after all, the right parties o...

i found such an interesting post, so, an oppositionist who fled to poland, he now works as a taxi driver, yuri valerievich sometimes mentions him in programs, so he wrote that the polish police fined him 500 euros and suspended his driver's license for 3 months for exceeding the speed limit by 50 km/h. and he writes: i'm still in shock, only when you encounter it yourself, you begin to understand how liberal belarus is a country, he writes, let me remind you, the oppositionist who fled to poland continues: comes to conclusion, further around this there is a big discussion, he writes: the fight against dictatorship the eu has long since turned into the worst possible example of dictatorship, in fact, genocide of belarusians. abroad, says a person who fled from us, i emphasize again, that is, this is not our person, say, there with them, but this is a separate view from the depths, from the depths of a wonderful garden, if he walked,

he would not see the light, we see that all our citizens who ended up there, they stopped participating in any political, social activity, because they simply do not have time, they need to survive, they need to pay for utilities, they need... to arrange for their children, pay for medical services, that is, they are faced with the harsh reality in this blooming garden, the second point, no one is helping them, they have no rights there, because they had rights only with us, they are kind of needed by us, we are calling them, and recently the speaker of our parliament, sergeenko, spoke and said: "we are in need, we want you to come back, the bulk of you." it specialists, programmers, and other people who fled there, but they are intimidated by the situation with belarus, that's what this oppositionist saw,

experienced on himself and even went as far as to say that the genocide of the belarusian people, this is experienced by every person who escaped, because they faced the reality when from a social state, yes, this is not an isolated case, they lived in a social state and did not appreciate it. all the advantages, so they came to the territory of capitalism, and of course, everyone is now shocked, so we, we are not watching this with some kind of, not with some kind of malice, we are saying, you watch our programs then you know, what to expect there. belarusian cultural figures talk about how their lives developed, they lived modestly, and with the beginning

of perestroika, artists have more freedom, so you shoot your wonderful autobiographical film, you receive an award for it again, you shoot a film under the blue sky, a tough drama, how was it received?

footage of life, watch on the belarus 24 tv channel. who and how helps to make our life better, what scientists are working on today. they are literally in our pocket, with them we learn. important news and become closer to each other friend, they are misleading, they tear us away from reality and yet, we are immersed in this web for hours every day. is it true that a person creates an alternative personality on social networks, and if so, how does it relate to the personality that actually exists? social networks are not a society, in fact, because there is a lot of false information there. but no one is responsible for this lie, and this is very convenient, so a new way to introduce yourself to another person has appeared, complex things in simple language, as well as the most

interesting facts: it was thanks to him that ancient people were able to survive in harsh conditions to continue their mouth, because he, despite everything, literally forced them to get up and go on. i'm talking now about a chemical substance that our... body produces in dopamine, what is dopamine in general specifically in psychiatry, dopamine has a wide range of important functions, such as behavior control, cognition, movement control. watch the project, science nearby on our tv channel. well, let's go further then, let's do it again, orban, nothing good the region is not waiting, these words can be applied not only to the economy. there are even more serious threats, for example, the intensification of attacks on nuclear facilities. it seems that someone is haunted by the fact that the atom can be peaceful. in recent months, we have seen that

first zaporizhzhya, then kursk are in the crosshairs. as drones hitting cooling towers do not bother the same barel very much. therefore , special attention was riveted to the arrival of the director general of the international atomic energy agency rafael grossia in belarus. it is clear that among the tasks in the international atomic energy agency, the issue of security is number one. we are committed to security, peace, and we will do everything we can, everything that depends on us, to ensure regional nuclear security. in this you can.

well, contact is contact, but let's also look at what he said yesterday, grosi, the day before yesterday and so on, let's say, just a week ago he said that the zaporizhzhya station should be given under the control of ukraine, ukraine, which does not control anything at all today, today he came to us, he says that yes, everything is fine here, everything fine, but nevertheless we must understand that this agency has also long ceased to have specificity. some kind of

independent view on things on problems, because everything would have been different, no one stood up for belarus when we started this project, when lithuania pretended to be some kind of nuclear target, there were no normal approaches, they just came, picked, dug, checked, measured, like the neighbors from... zavor with a ruler there after a while, despite all this, they they state, belarus is an example, and it seems to me, such a price is even more expensive, this is the best, well, they simply admitted, in essence, their defeat in this regard, because, what can they say, the station is working, it is protected, after all, it has a full range of protection, provision, everything else, there it is the ideal format

, the right one. says the president, the ideal format is a model for everyone else, so there is simply nothing to complain about, and he not only does not, no, i do not agree a little, he not only does not object, he directly absolutely complementary state that belarus is a slash example, and i would like to note another important point, that no matter how much european politicians, international structures try, the arrival of the director of magat, how would we treat him?

all the rest are fugitives, they all shouted: isolation of belarus, no one will talk, but everyone is talking, moreover, i will tell you this, all of europe would talk, they do not allow it yet, they would have said it a long time ago, they do not allow it, the white house does not allow it yet, i am not even talking about our lithuania, poland, this is not at all an example, and about nuclear energy, but not just an example, not just an example, we have not just proven for years that we do not pose a threat to anyone, take the chernobyl nuclear power plant, because...

there is no need to respond, neither on the part of belarus, and believe me, on the part of russia as well, well, even the chernobyl plant was dragged

into it, for us, for us it is very important not the political statements of the representatives of the magat, the head of the magat, but that they crawl around here with a ruler, measure everything, write it down and finally return to their duties, they should learn in belarus.

hollywood, category b, horror films, something else, so that the average person in the west understands what we are talking about, because in fact, if you walk down the streets there and ask, they don’t know anything, i heard it somewhere in some movie, there was some horror film,

they want to seize this in belarus, and what you are saying, i don’t mean this, we have always talked, the question is that with each such visit , western propaganda is shattered with its myths that we are isolated, although this long ago collapsed. on provocation, here is moscow, updated the conditions to sense, here is who expected that russia would respond with the use of nuclear weapons, putin's statement in the west was listened to with bated breath, so that no one would think that it seemed, dmitry peskov a little later assured that the statement of the russian president not only can, but must be considered. russia also takes into account aggression against russia from any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or with the support of a nuclear state, it is proposed

to consider as their joint attack on russian federation. the conditions for russia's transition to the use of nuclear weapons are also clearly established. we will consider this possibility upon receipt. reliable information about a massive launch of air and space attack weapons and their crossing of our state border. we reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against russia and belarus, as a member of the union state, with the belarusian side, with the president of belarus, all these issues have been agreed upon. including if the enemy, using conventional weapons, creates a critical threat to ours.

because already based on the regulatory framework, based on the documents, a corresponding blow will be dealt, but for us, for belarus , it is very important. that once again the leadership of the russian federation confirmed its determination to defend our territory as its own, this is very important, because it is no secret that the military potential, the combined military potential of nato countries, well, 30 times exceeds the potential of the union state, this nuclear umbrella, the nuclear umbrella, this actually remains the only effective means containment in the event of...

after finland, sweden joining nato, yes, when they deployed, now there will be a ground forces base in nato, deployed at the finnish-russian border, the flight time of missiles to russia, let's say, from that northern side was significantly reduced. here , after all, it is no longer a strategic factor, but

definitely personal relations, that is, president lukashenko protected all of us, thanks to his warm, friendly relations, which he built over 30 years with this superpower, with our strategic ally and partner, how do you look at it, well first of all i want to note that the nuclear powers are holding a pause for now, that is, they are actively processing the signals of the russian leader, on the other hand, i can note that those who are howling the loudest are those who have nothing to do with nuclear arsenals as such, yeah, and here we must understand that even lavrov's comment in this regard meant that there will be no war, the answer will just arrive faster than the request for it, that's the situation, because if

there will be an exchange of blows, who will fight? there will be no war, everyone talks about war, but there will be no war, that's why he calls this situation, there is a third world war, maybe what is happening now is a third world war, but a nuclear war, it's just two volleys, the last world war, the last world war. probably the last one noted another important point that neither the president of russia, nor especially belarus have ever waved a nuclear baton, these or whatever the last one is, but the point is that these are just two volleys, on one side, on the other side, there will be no war further, i would even the russian president's statements are in no way a threat, that's how tactfully russia behaves, that's who shouts the most, specifies, that means ukraine, it's clear we're used to it, lithuania, finland shouted, the polish president is a duda.

that's right, an exchange of blows and that's it, 30 minutes - that's alex sergeevich, a lot, that's if the foodless, zavsedy zikavoy,

i really like it, that's what's close to nature, we are engaged in the production of vegetables, as experience has shown, belarusian...

on this sweat, pure straight, they laid it on it these bulbyashniki were baked on one side, on the other, and served with cracklings, surprisingly versatile belarusian cuisine, without an egg - this is torkavanka, with an egg - this is already babka, babka, we will learn more about the historical past of belarusians, when kazhan-gorodok went to bonnie sforza, she decided to make a real european city out of it, arranged a regular layout, what does this mean, the central square and the streets extending from it, we will show what they eat in different parts of our country, what is the most popular dish that you have order for tomorrow, these are belgian waffles, well, also bylgian in brackets bobruisk waffles, as we miners say, whoever hasn't eaten a pie with jam hasn't been to the quarries,

watch the project food is great on the belarus 24 tv channel. we continue, zelensky tried to become the loudest during the regular session of the un general assembly held in new york, not only the russians got it from him, but also the chinese. true, they say that the representative of the prc most likely did not hear this in the original, since he was in a hurry to meet with the russian minister lavrov. well, much more interesting.

in the trash can on our president or what, what kind of nonsense is this, what international law, they destroyed everything, and then they start to reproach russia for defending its sovereignty, another phrase, here about double standards, which really struck me this week, the minister of foreign affairs, this is the us minister of defense or deputy, it doesn't matter, says: israel has the right to push aside, i say again, we are not for israel, we are not for anyone, belarus is for peace, israel and... has the right to push aside other states around it at some distance of 100 km, so that there is no threat, and russia has no right to push nato 200 km away from its borders. along the perimeter of the union state, but we are not pushing it away yet, we are currently conducting russia from its own, and if we reason like that, then russia can push back

the polish one, why did you put so many troops on your border, who gave you the right, this is also a threat, if we reason like that, therefore double standards are a lie, and the representative of serbia is absolutely right, well, no matter how vucic was right, these are still words after the fact, because if we have already remembered the general assembly, then when all this was just beginning, it was belarus. is experiencing a serious crisis, the entire international security system has lost mutual trust between global players, the lack of readiness for compromise, a return to elements of bloc confrontation, in fact , they have put the world on the brink of a new war, now...

i do not agree that there is no need to speak out there on international platforms, that all international structures, they no longer work, this is a mistaken opinion, the fact that today the minister of foreign affairs of belarus stands and

speaks the truth, this is extremely important not only for us, for the whole world, if they were not afraid of our truth, they would not be so nervous, when new blocs are being formed now, when they have analytics now, what about brick, what should we do with him, and what should we do with the new one, with the new alliances in asia in the middle east, where belarus plays a huge role, therefore, each of these speeches adds supporters to us, those who are silent, many are afraid, afraid of sanctions, but they listen and they know, belarus is standing here, lavrov will speak now, he will tell the truth, he will come to china now, he will tell the truth, we are not alone, these speeches are important, the voice of truth is important, we are heard, and this is very important for the future of the world, i agree, those who have ears will hear, as they say, here is a well-known axiom, but let's also understand that the boxes there are not boxes, pandora's are not pandora's, but after the mongol-tatar game, it must be noted that

the anglo-saxon game has arrived, which... the main thing is, i will support it 100 times, we must say, the un, tomorrow another organization, in principle, when you are silent, no one will hear you, when you speak, then some percentage will reach the consciousness, the subconscious, and change behavior, in fact, they are really waiting for speeches from both russian

leaders and belarusian representatives, and let's say, the same...

where did he break down, at what point, after all, when this nonsense of the twentieth year, the revolution, did not pass, because in fact, you look, what statements were made during that period?

look what we are observing, you probably addressed dmitry alexandrovich synchronously, how the british, american, all the western press, it must be, started talking, suddenly about peace at the cost of territories, and the finnancial times is talking

about separate negotiations of the head of the ukrainian ministry of foreign affairs, who allegedly offered to give up part of the country, the wall street journal and the new york times, that is, they started leaking what we said, if they had... an alliance with russia, a geopolitical choice and sovereignty, which he strengthens in this alliance, this is what they can never forgive us, and that he did not give up the country, that's it, that's it, thank you for this conversation, the program time is up, but

i think we've managed to talk about the main topic, that's all for today, see you in a week.