hans: coming up on "bloomberg best," interviews from the davos economics for him. and leadersinkers bring their insight to bloomberg television. >> we are continuing to invest into the downturn. >> do we think the world is falling apart? do we think that this is 2008 all over again? we do not think that. hans: unique perspectives from the biggest names in business. join us now on "bloomberg best." ♪

hans: hello, i am hans nichols. welcome to "bloomberg best." we have been speaking with the world's most influential policymakers to get their take on the business world today and where it is heading. >> do you think this downturn means something more sinister for the world economy? >> we see this has iced down the downward turn, and i think that is where we are at the moment. we have come out of the deepest financial crisis and we are now nine years out of that crisis. in that time, the global order had reversed. there was policy problems and in and the emergency market, there were new roles, and some used these wisely and some didn't. now that things are reverting to the old order, the industry countries are doing better than emerging markets. it is a normal correction. it will last for some more time, but i don't think we will see changes with the downward economy.

erik: does it feel too good right now that this is just a correction or is this something deeper and more enduring? stephen: it feels like a correction to me. if it was china in a freefall, i would be concerned. i don't think that the consumer and the service economy -- they are holding up pretty well in china. but there are parts that are way overdone, whether it is steel, coal, overbuilding of residential and in certain of the interior cities, and so if you just take one anecdote, you could get -- you could get really -- erik: you could get what you want, right? stephen: you could paint a really bad picture, in terms of the stock market and in terms of policy implantation. erik: if the selloff doesn't stop, what happens then? stephen: this could affect the economy if this affects of the

behavior of regular people, and overbuilding of residential and in certain of the interior cities, and so if you just take one anecdote, you could get -- you could get really -- erik: you could get what you want, right? stephen: you could paint a really bad picture, in terms of the stock market and in terms of policy implantation. erik: if the selloff doesn't stop, what happens then? stephen: this could affect the economy if this affects of the behavior of regular people, and +at this point, i don't think that is happened -- that has happened. francine: what do you think the

markets are spooked by? >> well, overall my perspective is, if you really want to look and forecast the economy and look at the real economy, don't look at the financial markets as an intermediary of the real economy. there has been a disconnect between what the world financial markets tell you and what the world really shows you. it was really pronounced in china where financial markets

went off their own way almost unrelated to the economy. by the way, the correction in the financial markets in china is significant and maybe, i would say, welcome, because any balloon that has too much air in it needs to let some air out without getting to explosion. but let's face it, china is mirroring a very small section of the chinese economy. china will continue to grow. it will continue to grow at a slower rate than it has. it is by design. they have changed their growth strategy, which means they do not need to grow as rapidly. it has international applications. it reduces the demand of commodities by china. it has indications in a case-by-case approach. not everybody is affected. erik: once again, the selloff feels kind of like 2009, but i hope not. brian: will countries be able to sustain that growth? i think that tug-of-war things plays out in the market.

erik: it sounds sensible. brian: it is sensible. at the end of the day, these companies have to keep driving, and the economy is just as strong as it was a few weeks ago. francine: what is your main concern today? deflation? is it china? maurice: first, i would like to make just a small comment regarding the reaction of the market. they are overreacting to news. i think there is no new news. when you look at the situation regarding oil prices or the growth in china as well as the other issues, the growth, the global growth, there was an

indication that it was not going to improve markedly in 2016. i am just a little bit concerned, but i think there is an overreaction. francine: right. maurice: it is not that new. it is not a real slowdown. we have not had the kind of growth that we were expecting. we can tell. who, besides the french, were really thinking that the economy would take off next year or this year? >> the market is so near-sighted. here is the problem. the market sees these problems that are so immediate. the market does not know how to interpret 4 billion human beings needs cheaper energy costs and

that that money will be re-put back into the economy. this is why the market still may have some digestive problems, but at the end of the year, we will see a higher market. global gdp will be around 3%. maybe not as high as the imf believed. but i am not that worried. >> you are managing a lot of asset control on a lot of people. what do you tell them? >> it has been so fast, this correction that we are in the middle of, and in many ways, that is more helpful and more cathartic rather than if it were slow and painful. and i think that is allowing people to hope that it is just an asset price recovery and not something more to do that has to involve the economy, and the can actually be quite helpful in some of all of the cash on the sidelines in many portfolios. and as you begin to find better entry levels, perhaps we can get back to normal. but what we don't hear is our clients panicking. there is not a lot of money

jumping in at any particular point in time. >> how much of this is china, how much of this is oil, and how much is this something else? mary: those two things alone are in which you have a very interesting event are not going to cause a global intervention. francine: a few weeks ago, you said we should actually be much more careful so we avoid repeating 2008. george: 2008, regarding repeating, it was a time of financial crisis and a bear market. and we have the same conditions today. but the source of this equilibrium is different. in 2008, it was the subprime crashes. this year, it is china, so it is not comparable. francine: is this because they

are not doing how we would think or deflation? george: it is deflation and over indebtedness over the chinese economy. the total social debt is down 300% and maybe actually might be up to 350% if you take into account the external event. so it is serious. ♪ hans: welcome back to "bloomberg best." i'm hans nichols live in davos at the 2016 economic forum. here are "bloomberg best's" best conversations from the week. francine: when do you see it bottom out in oil prices? fatih: i think it is also at

hans: welcome back to "bloomberg

best." i'm hans nichols live in davos at the 2016 economic forum. here are "bloomberg best's" best conversations from the week. francine: when do you see it bottom out in oil prices? fatih: i think it is also at issue for oil, because lower, slower oil demand. which means there is going to be lots of oil in the market. we will have more supply than the demand. for 2016, the supply and demand situation will be under pressure and i don't see any reason why we will have a surprise increase in 2016. francine: at some point, this undersupply will come onto the market. is there any possibility that

after two months, this will affect the market more? fatih: this index at very low investments, which means in a few years' time, there'll be more new projects coming on the scene to meet the growth. if we look at the economies of a major oil producer, they are in bad shape and they may be in worse shape if this progress continues at this level. francine: but you are telling me that we are creating a shock. you are telling me that we have a potential of creating an oil shock? fatih: i wouldn't it use of the word shock, but there will be pressure on the upward sector because of the lack of

investment two years in a row in the oil sector. francine: i know there is an oil oversupply issue, but will we hit the bottom at six months away, or in 12 months? daniel: i think because the producers show no inclination to get together, we think that in the second half of the year, this is so severe that you start to see a rebalance in the market, maybe at the beginning of 2017. tom: this suncor transaction announced this week in canada means that oil is much more cheaper then the global price. when you talk about a balance, what do you mean by that? daniel: price starts to move up, and at the end of the year, we could see prices, you know, a good deal higher than they are today. it is not at $60, it is not at $70, but the prices will come back and operate more along the fundamentals of a balance.

francine: and i do think -- [indiscernible] daniel: at this time, this is a gop political problem, too, which is that saudi arabia and iran are at odds and saudi arabia says that there is not room for iranian oil and i ran it wants the market back and they need to get together, unless, and this is what we're saying, and we need to make sure that this happens and even the russians will get a cut. >> for me, i think this is more of a meeting and for a chance to sit down and talk. price is really not the issue. it is about the future of the oil industry, the future of the oil stock. it is a whole on more than

price. what, for example, is the matter with having a diversity center in five or 10 years to bring back the market? i don't think a cyclical downward turn it will show up tomorrow as a major upward movement to affect the economy. prices today are not good enough and there is a lot of stock in the market. they cannot do this all alone. we need to get opec back in and they need to talk. >> i spent a large part of my career doing m&a deals where they were between $10 and $20 a barrel. >> a lot of people forget that. >> yeah, exactly. a lot of big companies were built, we're talking exxon, shell, bp, they were built when oil was $10 or $20 per barrel. i think this is a period when people are going to look to aggressive consolidation.

>> i think this creates a lot of challenges for total economies. however, on the bottom side of it, we need to look at this as supply and demand economics and we need to overcome the current problems of oil prices, for example. the challenges for companies to focus on growth and to focus on long-term, and i think that is the way you can overcome the current challenges for your company. francine: how much do you understand about what is going on in china? what is your view? yousef: i think we are excited about one important element, and that china has announced last month that their economy heavily depends on foreign investment and export. at the same times, this would improve upon their quality of

products. i think this is strategically a very positive transformation for china. francine: will it take time? yousef: it will take time. but this will transform into a very positive contribution toward the overall economy. ♪

hans: you are watching a special edition of "bloomberg best." political leaders, policy leaders, and power makers in politics and finance all come together here for the week in davos. but their philosophies and views differ, and that was on display in some of our best interviews of the week. francine: so are you expecting

more volatility in 2016? christine: there will be volatility in 2016. we have three major downside risks on the horizon, and one of those is the massive chinese transition to a new economy, which will be bumpy but will seem resolute and is welcome coming from a very high growth rate to a lower growth rate and going from export driven to being consumption driven to being industry driven and all of that will entail a degree of volatility. the lower commodity prices are also going to entail a degree of volatility as well as economic policies around the world and changes coming up in 2016. francine: your biggest concern is a risk of inflation? christine: the biggest concern is to make sure that the global economy is actually on track to provide enough growth to respond to the needs of those people who are looking for jobs, those

people who are expecting more sustainable growth. that is the main concern. francine: and you think this will achieve that? christine: we need an upgrade of policies. policy makers need to agree more and agree on the right set of policies that will improve the global situation as well as their own domestic situation. tom: how do the developed countries maintain confidence and avoid stagnation in emerging markets? >> growth would be good. we would love the industrial countries to grow faster and the real question is how we can make that happen. my sense is certainly, stimulus has run its course. take it as an issue. once you are in a situation, how do you get out of that to change those ground prices. of that is what we are grappling

with today. but globally speaking, i think the answer has to lie in the underpinnings of growth. jonathan: are there any negative consequences at all of running a budget deficit of over 3%, because at this point, it doesn't seem that there is? what are they? >> it is about debt. debt is a burden to all of us. jonathan: but if it is above 3%, why does it matter? >> if debt will keep rising, you can't do anything with your services, you cannot finance education, you cannot finance health, you cannot finance security, you cannot finance anything. you will not move forward for proper economy, social, and security policies. for europe it is a security policy. >> i have to say, tom, it is a

little interesting to me that when china was growing, everyone said they were exporting inflation. francine: now they are deflating. [laughter] tom: are they escorting the inflation or is that an undergraduate fallacy? >> it was productivity shock that was good and now they are collapsing and it is not good. i certainly think that the overarching phenomenon of these banks shows real interest rates and that has driven them down. i think, you know, they have to think about negative interest rates. i have written for 20 years about so you could go to negative interest rates. that is considered wacko, but who knows? tom: what is your policy prescription to amend the nascent situation in america?

bob: this is a plan so that the taxes on the rich go up in such a way that you kind of preserve the inequality that we have today. i am not proposing that we breathe address it now. you know, haven't we agreed that it has gone far enough? tom: what about the republican party talking about too much taxes, when you look at the aggregate sum of so many taxes, and even if it i give them my tax dollars, they won't know how to spend it? bob: if i am talking to republicans --

tom: this is exclusive, mr. bob schiller talks to republicans. [laughter] bob: the other thing is, we need to develop insurance, free market insurance vehicles to protect against inequality. and we virtually already have that. in fact, to some extent, life insurance, fire insurance, these are all engines protecting us. if your house burned down, you used to be poor. not anymore. we have to expand the scope of our insurance industry and we should start insuring livelihoods. hans: coming up, more interviews from "bloomberg best." ♪ hans: we are here in this

protective valley and the theme has been technology on the fourth industrial revolution. is this the right environment to discuss disruptive change. this is the best conversations from the week. >> what messages are you getting from the markets? >> i'm not worried about what message i get from the market. our businesses are doing great. we expect them to do better still. you've got oil collapsed. not but cause -- because of the -- it exceeds demand. you've got iran coming on. you have half of million barrels a day. we're looking at a world with low crude prices for many years to come. stephanie: it's expensive to fill those planes. richard: it will have a positive impact on consumers.

stephanie: i don't see that anywhere. richard: it will all come through. that's why it's so baffling that the markets are behaving this way. america and europe are not that dependent on china. china has dropped in its growth. i am completely baffled by the fact that they are cutting oil shares down by 30%. more companies will be with the lose --. i think china -- i don't think china is going to any fundamental collapse. it's going to be growing 6% this year. it's still a great economy. i am not worried about the long-term for china. even if they caught a major cold, it's not get have that bigger affect on the united states or europe. the end result is going lower

commodity prices. everybody else will benefit. >> you've got a robust business. maybe the bad news is the analyst expect you to keep that up. >> i think there is a secular tailwind behind digital payments and mobile payments. for the first time ever, more people shopped online and on mobile phones than the stores on black friday. there is a secular tailwind around the move meant cash to digital and the explosion of mobile phones as well.

you've got the power of a bank branch in the palm of your hand. there are tailwinds behind us. we've got a lot to execute on. >> is there a limit to the number of digital payments merchants will support? >> you hear an announcement every week about some other payment form going on. what merchants are concerned about is not digital payments using mobile and software to get closer to customers. most people conflate digital payments with tapping your phone at a point of sale. i think that's just a form factor change. if it's just a matter of tapping your phone versus swiping a card, that's not very exciting. if there's a real value change at the point-of-sale, you can skip line, you can order ahead, you can get awards on your mobile phone, that's a real value proposition change it i think when that starts to happen, retailers are looking at that and you will see an acceleration of digital payment systems off-line. you see it online. >> there's a notion that everything is really bad.

yes, there is a lot of red and green. there is a lot of opportunity in the world and people are coming >> there's a notion that everything is really bad. yes, there is a lot of red and green. there is a lot of opportunity in the world and people are coming into the middle class in africa

and asia in many parts of the world. there is high unemployment. there is high yield unemployment and we've got to do something about that. commodities are very benign. there are some and takes. at the same time, we need to be more targeted with our investments. we are continuing to invest in the downturn. stephanie: you are not in the business of m&a this year. seen the pain so many companies are facing, and this be a time of consolidation? >> we've got one acquisition. there is a lot of work to get that.

they have tremendous hotels in great brands and we want to get that done in a way that's constructive and builds the platform we think we can build long-term. stephanie: do you think competition with the right for m&a? >> the cheapness is not as profound. even in our deal with starwood, we are using equity so the value of the deal is less than when we announced it or it we are using the same number of shares. it could be china. it could be private equity platforms of some sort. stephanie: where do you want to get more conservative? >> we are not pulling back at all. every deal we do, we deal with a third-party real estate investor. we signed a lot of hotel rooms

went to our system for the next few years. we think the long-term travel trends will be very powerful. >> what is acceptable? we are talking about emissions for diesel. >> what is acceptable? >> it's not up to me to say. the industry, you have electric cars, you have hybrids and many other technologies. we are talking about one specific in mission. outside the norms, we need the rules. francine: how long do you expect this to hang over your share price? >> people have questions about something like this.

francine: when will it stop? >> all the data will come. we will have confirmation of what we have been saying. there is no risk of cheating. francine: what the job risk? >> the whole company would be at risk. you stand by the announcement. francine: what has been the most frequent question by shareholders? >> is there any lien will be on the company? that is the main question. that is my share prices go down. whenever they are reassured there is no liability and the problem is more about expectation in areas, things will die down. ♪

hans: welcome back. here are some the conversations we had with the just names in the business at the world economic forum. francine: talk to us about m&a. there were megamergers driven by the need to cut costs. his volatility something that will spur more m&a this year? >> it's too early to tell. extreme volatility reduces m&a. people get afraid. it's hard to know when you are pricing into a difficult environment. certain types of volatility call m&a when companies feel the pressure from lack of growth. all of the signs are on the pressure of deflation creating a pressure across industries. consolidation is a way to grow the bottom line. francine: they will be consolidating this year? >> we are in the early stages of seeing the damage done by low

commodity prices. the report the fact of commodities and how they move when they decline on a global basis, normally it ripples through the industries and into the banking sector. almost never can you avoid problems in the banking industry when commodities go down. >> is blackstone having trouble raising financing? >> we are on two sides of the credit arc. we are a big credit operation. they are experiencing the other side of that.

there is a big demand for money, much higher rates of return than there were. they are a listing investments. they go down on a market to market basis. not the ability to have principal on interest returned. it's more of a mark that an impairment. in the junk markets, the jump markets have cap doubt. it's hard to issue large quantities of junk is the markets go through a time of instability. it doesn't mean dealmaking is on hold. price sometimes cares some of these other issues. as stock markets have gone down, valuations have gone down and that arm we takes six months or year for all of those new relationships to normalize. then there will be larger scale buying start.

>> if there is a repricing happening in some borrowers are shut out of the market, what effect will that have on m&a? >> we have not had any downturns in conversations. the amount of discussions about what to do, i'm not going to say it's better. it hasn't stopped. >> we could see 2016 be as good a year as 2015? >> possibly. it was fairly flat. i don't have the number on the tip of my tongue. i think you will see the middle market companies try to find ways to up their credit and do things to solve problems that are coming as a result of the slowdown of the economy. >> we think this is a positive

time to be investing. the prices are lower. the currencies are better. i think you're going to see investors come into the market. the question of liquidity is around the traders providing liquidity. >> is there a structural change beyond the recognition? a lot of automatic trading through algorithms, has the structural market changed to do a get more volatile? >> yes. they are pressured by regulators to get out of speculated and commodities. now we have a lot of volatility in commodities. we're surprised at this? >> is now it's time to be shopping for bargains?

>> i think we're starting to feel opportunistic. there may be some rock 'n roll. i think there will be some rock 'n roll in the markets. if i do that, i would be a billionaire. i think there is going to be some rock 'n roll and it does require prudence. with the focus the governments need to have on building growth, do we think the world is falling apart? we do not think that. hans: more conversations from our coverage of the world economic forum. ♪

hans: welcome back to "bloomberg best." mario draghi and the european central bank rolled out a massive quantitative easing program. voluntary policy was on people's minds. tom: lower for longer interest rates are one of your fears. what are the ramifications? >> there are concerns about china and the oil price falling because of global growth. there are emerging markets and conflicts. they are making the market nervous right now. bad news becomes good news when there is policy reaction. therefore, you saw what happened when he said we are likely to do more in march.

the markets rallied. the markets are expecting the fed to height later on. this is a situation where the hate it is shaky. -- data is shaky. tom: you don't agree with george soros on a hard landing or china and the world? >> the financial imbalances are smaller. i've been interviewed for a number of years. it's going to be bumpy and rough. francine: mario draghi said he is ready to act. how much will it help? >> the markets have

misunderstood what happened in the previous meeting. the markets sold off. that was a mistake. markets expect action and there was no action coming. for draghi, he did not want to act without having german support. he wanted stronger evidence. he did not want to push it. he had one or both of those conditions. now he could confirm that he has it and they will act in march. i was going to predicted tonight. they stole my line. stephanie: mario draghi spoke and got everyone comfortable.

is it time to ease again? erik schatzker: it depends on if this is a temporary correction. >> the absence of fundamentals suggest it might be. this is a strong market reaction against a background of solid global economic growth, not phenomenal. this is solid growth of 3%. as you know and report on every date, the markets are very irrational. the animal spirits do rain. companies that were worth 40% more six months ago, nothing changed and they are dropping. the difference this time is oil. >> i was not somebody who

thought that the fed should he raising rates quite yet. i would like to see a little more certainty in the global economy. >> do you like larry summers argument? >> i don't know where i go on the overall secular stagnation. if you asked me what i think is the great struggle of our time or great challenge of our time, we have increasing globalization and technology that is dramatic. it's doing all kinds of fantastic things. there is one thing that's not as clear, is it leading to a broadening or hollowing out of the middle class? i think in each advanced country they are wrestling with that right now. erik schatzker: janet yellen thought that on the basis of

strength in the labor market and expectations for a little inflation, raising rates was the right thing to do good are we going to look back and say that was a mistake? >> the fed's credibility is on the line. if i was in the room and had the same information, i probably would've made the same decision that made. since then, a downdraft in terms of oil and slowing in china, what we are through, we don't see this as a negative fundamental shift in terms of the markets. there is a repricing. stephanie: should she raise

again? >> they should watch and see. we thought we would see four rate hikes and that his move back to three. some are starting to talk about two. we're going to have a wait-and-see attitude. hans: that's all for this special edition from the world economic forum in switzerland. you can always get more business coverage at bloomberg.com. i'm hans nichols. thanks watching bloomberg television.

. .

announcer: "brilliant ideas," powered by hyundai motors. narrator: the contemporary art world is vibrant and booming as never before. it is the 21st century phenomenon, a global industry in its own right. "brilliant ideas" looks at the artists at the heart of this. artists with a unique power to aspire, astonish, provoke. in this program, pioneering film artist diana thater. ♪